Alden Valley Ridge Rehab & Hcc

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

30.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 207 beds and averages 169.2 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.69 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.66 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.83 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to follow up with a Wound Consult ordered on 5/27/25 which resulted in the resident not being seen until 6/5/25. This failure resulted in a delay in Wound consult, assessment and implementation of new interventions for a pressure wound that deteriorated to an unstageable pressure injury.The findings include:R95's most recent pressure ulcer risk assessment (dated 04/22/25) showed R95 is at Mild Risk for developing pressure ulcers.On 06/03/25 at 9:51 AM, R95 was sleeping in bed. At 9:53 AM, V38 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) said R95 had some redness on her backside. V38 said she was unsure if R95 had any wounds because she only cleans the skin around a dressing when providing incontinence care. At 10:07 AM, V32 (R95's POA-Power of Attorney) said that the facility had not mentioned anything about R95 having any pressure sores or open skin.On 06/04/25 at 2:10 PM, V16 (ADON-Assistant Director of Nursing/IP-Infection Preventionist) reviewed the EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) list and said that R95 was not on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to practice safe food preparation, and properly label/date/seal/store food items in the facility kitchen. This applies to all residents that receive oral nutrition and foods prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include: The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid (Form CMS-Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-671) dated 6/3/25 documents that the total census was 162 residents. On 6/3/25 at 10:29 AM, V20 (Dietary Manager) said they only have 1 NPO (Nothing By Mouth) resident. On 6/3/25 starting at 9:30 AM, the facility kitchen was toured independently and the following was found: In Main Kitchen Area: 1.4 different prescription pills were found sitting on a plate on the food preparation counter. V25 (Dietary Aide) said the pills were hers. 2. The robo-coup blender and large plastic storage container of thickener with the lid off were located within splash distance of the handwashing sink. In the walk-in cooler: 3. There was no room to walk in the cooler, there were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 6/3/25 at 10:33 AM, R87 was in bed. Her hair was not combed and greasy. R87 stated, It's been a while since they shampooed my hair. I would like my hair washed and combed. R87's MDS dated [DATE] shows she is moderately impaired in cognition. R87's care plan dated (5/12/25) shows she has an ADL functional performance deficit due to diagnosis of major depressive disorder, hypokalemia, iron deficiency anemia, hyperlipidemia, CHF (Congestive Heart Failure), GERD (Gastro-esophageal reflux disorder), and Osteoarthritis of hip. Intervention: Assist with ADL tasks as needed. 3. On 6/3/25 at 11:14 AM, R2 was in bed. She had hair on her chin and upper lip. R2 stated, I wanna be shaved. It doesn't look good. R2's MDS dated [DATE] shows she is cognitively intact. R2's care plan dated (7/24/24) shows she has an ADL Self Care Performance deficit due to diagnosis of encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery. Intervention: Assist with ADL tasks as needed. 4. On 6/3/25 at 11:20 AM, R121 was in bed. Her hair was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to safely secure an oxygen cylinder. to prevent from tipping over and potentially causing a fire or explosion. This applies to 1 out of 3 residents (R143) reviewed for oxygen tanks in a sample size of 32. The findings include: On 6/3/2025 at 10:11 AM, 6/4/2025 at 9:05 AM and 6/4/2025 at 9:21 AM, a portable oxygen cylinder was unsecured on the floor. The oxygen cylinder was located on the head part on the right side of R143's bed and was half full. R143 said he does not use oxygen. On 6/5/2025 at 8:35 AM , V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) said portable oxygen cylinders should be secured in a container to keep from tipping over. She said oxygen is flammable and if it tips over, may cause a fire or explosion. R143's POS (Physician Order Sheet) showed no order for oxygen and his MDS (Minimum Data Sheet) dated 5/15/2025 documents that R143 has intact cognitive functions. Facility's undated Policy and Procedure on Oxygen storage documents the following: Policy Oxygen will be stored in accordance with applicable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity during a meal. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R46 and R73) who were reviewed for feeding assistance in a sample of 32. Findings included: During an observation of the lunch meal at 12:27 PM on 06/04/2025, V37 (Certified Nursing Assistant), after completing assisting R73, without changing her sitting arrangement, overstretching to reach R46 to feed her by passing over R73. On 06/05/2025 at 10:00 AM, V37 said she should have sat between V46 and V73, or changed R73 to a different table after feeding her. V37 stated that she understands her residents should be treated with respect and dignity. The review of R46's EMR (Electronic Medical Records) showed that R46's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, psychosis, anemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and anxiety disorder. Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R46's cognition is severely impaired, is not interviewable, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R11 and R21) observed for infection control in a sample of 32. Findings include: 1. On 06/03/25 at 3:25 PM, R21 was in the dining room reclined and slouched in a highback wheelchair. On the table in front of R21 was a brown semi-liquid substance with some dried areas that had the odor of excrement. R21 was playing with the brown substance using her left fingers, like finger painting on the table. V4 (Activity Aide) brought R21 to the nurse's station and, without donning gloves, used a dry paper towel to wipe the right armrest and R21's right arm, which was covered in the brown substance. After wiping R21's arm and armrest, V4 threw away the soiled paper towel and, without performing hand hygiene, punched in the code to access the clean utility room. Without performing hand hygiene, V4 donned gloves to clean off the table in the dining room. On 06/03/25 at 3:47 PM, V6…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to submit an initial resident abuse allegation to the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) for an allegation of sexual abuse. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse reporting. The findings include: Review of the facility's Abuse Policy, dated 09/20, stated in part, Initial Reporting of Allegations shall be completed immediately upon notification of the allegation. The written report shall be sent to the Department of Public Health. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including dementia, cardiac disorders with a pacemaker, venous thrombosis, type 2 dialysis, and chronic kidney disease, R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 09/11/2024 shows R3 is cognitively severely impaired requires two staff assistance for mobility and transfer. The facility investigation report dated 11/04/2024 showed R3 (R2's family member), who is on the second floor, reported to V4 (Director…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were transferred and/or repositioned in a safe manner for 4 of 33 residents (R69, R66, R114, and R130) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 33. The findings include: 1. On 8/19/24 at 10:50 AM, V10 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) and V11 (CNA) finished changing R69. V10 was on one side of R69's bed and V11 was on the other side. V10 and V11 each hooked their respective arms under R69's underarms and pulled R69 up in bed. Then, V10 and V11 proceeded to pull R69 forward by R69's underarms using the same method described above to reposition R69's pillow. On 8/19/24 at 11:24 AM, V16 (CNA) said when boosting a resident in bed there should be a person on each side of the bed and they should use the bed pad or flat sheet to pull the resident up in bed. V16 said it is not safe to pull a resident up by their arms. R69's admission Record shows she is a [AGE] year old female. R69's current care plan provided by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a COVID-19 positive resident remained in isolation, failed to ensure a resident identified as a close contact with COVID-19 symptoms was wearing a mask, failed to ensure staff donned personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing care for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), failed to ensure residents with feeding tubes were placed on EBP, and failed to perform hand hygiene and change gloves during pericare to prevent cross contamination. These failures apply to 8 of 33 residents (R44, R91, R9, R60, R57, R33, R17, R19) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 33. The findings include: 1. R44's Facesheet printed on 8/21/24 showed R44 to be a [AGE] year old female resident readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. This document showed a new diagnosis of COVID-19 on 8/12/24. R44's COVID-19 Results Worksheet showed R44 being COVID-19 positive on 8/12/24. R44's Order Summary printed on 8/21/24 showed an order for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident with privacy during activities of daily living (ADL) care for 1 of 33 residents (R17) reviewed for privacy in the sample of 33. The findings include: R17's admission Record shows he was admitted tot he facility on September 7, 2007 with diagnoses including dementia, non pressure chronic ulcer of skin, depressive episodes, and kidney disease. R17's Care Plan initiated on June 10, 2024 shows R17 is incontinent of bowel and bladder. On August 19, 2024 at 9:56 AM, V4 and V5 (Certified Nursing Assistants/CNA) were preparing to provide incontinence care for R17. V5 CNA folded R17's incontinence brief downward in between in legs while he was laying on his back. R17's curtain was not closed and R17's roommate was in his bed, facing R17, and talking with V4 and V5. R17's front peri area was exposed. On August 20, 2024 at 1:32 PM, V14 CNA said resident's curtains should be closed during incontinence care so the resident has privacy. The State of Illinois Residents' Rights revised November 2018 shows,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff-dependent residents were provided incontinence care for 2 of 33 residents (R34, R51) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's) in the sample of 33. The findings include: 1. R34's current care plan showed R34 was dependent on staff for incontinence care and toileting. R34 was cognitively intact. On 8/19/24 at 9:32 AM, R34 was in bed, eating breakfast. R34 stated, They really treat me good here but, lately it seems like it's taking longer for someone to come change me. There have been times that I have waited over five hours for someone to come. I wear a brief. This last time someone changed me today was around 4 AM. At 9:38 AM, V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) entered R34's room to provide cares. V12 stated this was her first time providing incontinence care to R34 for the day. V12 removed R34's brief which was saturated with urine. Urine had leaked out of R34's brief, onto R34's sheet and mattress. 2. R51's current care plan showed R51 was dependent on staff for incontinence care and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ALDEN NETWORK — 27 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL