Rolling Hills Health And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 37.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 27% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 65.8 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 69 residents with 13 selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain comfortable and safe temperature levels of 71 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or greater for ten residents, Resident (R)2, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13 when a facility furnace quit working mid-morning on 01/12/24. The furnace supplied heat to one of four wings, covering six resident rooms, with ten residents affected. Following the breakdown, a repairman came to the facility that afternoon and determined the part needed to repair the furnace required ordering. The facility placed portable infrared space heaters in the resident rooms until 01/16/24 at 02:04 PM, at which time the Fire Marshall instructed the facility to remove the space heaters. One of the ten residents, R8, moved to another room on another wing, while the nine other residents affected chose to remain in their rooms. The facility failed to monitor and document temperatures of the resident rooms until 01/17/24, after the surveyor was on site, and failed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 69 residents, with thirteen sampled, and three reviewed for significant medication errors. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for Resident (R)1 when facility staff prepared and wrongly administered R4's medications, which included high risk medications, to R1 on 12/18/23. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R prepared R4's medications, then asked R1 if she was ready for her medication and R1 nodded yes, so CMA R administered R4's medications to R1. CMA R thought R1 resembled the picture in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for R4. Shortly after administration of the medications, CMA R heard Administrative Nurse E speak to R1 and realized she administered R4's medications to R1. R1 had a change in condition, her blood pressure dropped, and she required emergency medical service intervention. Staff transferred R1 to the hospital via emergency medical services and R1 admitted to observation for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to follow sanitary dietary standards related to food storage, unclean floors, and monitoring of dishwasher temps. Findings included:- During the initial tour on 06/22/2026 at 07:42 AM, observation revealed the following:The floors were sticky and dirty, thick dark dirt was around all standing work area legs. There was a cup of pudding with whipped topping in the single refrigerator that was undated and unlabeled. There were seven small bags of chicken in a steam table pan that were unlabeled and undated in the two-door refrigerator.The dishwasher was missing temperature recordings for 06/19/2026, 06/20/2026, 06/21/2026, and 06/22/2026.On 06/22/2026 at 08:00 AM, Dietary Staff BB stated the floors needed deep cleaning. He stated the kitchen floors were deep cleaned twice a year. Dietary Staff BB stated staff mopped the floor every night. He said the chicken was brought in by a family member, and the bags should have been dated before they were placed in the refrigerator. Dietary Staff BB stated he would dispose of the pudding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to offer and provide or obtain informed declination for the influenza and pneumococcal vaccination for Resident (R) 1, R5, R49, and R62 or their representative. Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R1, R5, R49, and R62, lacked evidence of an informed declination for the influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations. The Immunizations tab for the above residents noted that the vaccinations had been offered but refused by the residents.Upon request, the facility was unable to provide documentation that the vaccination information, including risks verses benefits was provided to R1, R5, R49, and R62 and was unable to provide documentation of informed declination.On 06/24/2026 at 10:25, Licensed Nurse (LN) G, the facility Infection Preventionist, stated that each fall the influenza and pneumococcal vaccination was offered to residents. If the resident chose to get the vaccination, it was given. LN G stated the facility did not have residents or their representative sign a consent to decline the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-24 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain an informed declination for the COVID-19 vaccination was provided for Resident (R)1, R5, R49, and R62 or their representative. Findings included:- Review of Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R1 lacked evidence of informed declination for the COVID-19 vaccination. The Immunizations tab for R1 noted that the vaccinations had been offered June 2026 but refused by the resident.R5's EMR lacked evidence of informed declination for the COVID-19 vaccination. The Immunizations tab for R5 noted that the vaccinations had been offered June 2026 but refused by the resident.R49's EMR lacked evidence of informed declination for the COVID-19 vaccination. The Immunizations tab for R49 noted that the vaccinations had been offered June 2026 but refused by the resident.R62's EMR lacked evidence of informed declination for the COVID-19 vaccination. The Immunizations tab for R62 noted that the vaccinations had been offered June 2026 but refused by the resident.On 06/24/2026 at 10:25 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G, the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the correct Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Form 10055, Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN), for two residents, Resident (R)34 and R55. Findings included:- The Medicare ABN form informed the beneficiaries Medicare may not pay for future skilled therapy and did not provide an estimated cost to continue their services. The form included options for the beneficiary to () receive specified services listed, and bill Medicare for an official decision on payment. I understand if Medicare does not pay, I will be responsible for payment, but I can appeal to Medicare. (2) receive therapy listed, but do not bill Medicare, I am responsible for payment of services. (3) I do not want the listed services.The facility's Medicare ABN form staff provided to R34 (or their representative) was form CMS-R-131 for the last covered day of 02/10/2026.The facility's Medicare ABN form staff provided to R55 (or their representative) was form CMS-R-131 for the last covered day of 06/02/2026.On 06/23/2026 at 01:30 PM, Social Service X…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the continued use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) for Resident (R) 62. Findings included:- R62's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses ofanxiety, major depressive disorder, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and need for assistance with personal care. R62's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 05/07/2026 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R62 received antipsychotic medication and an antidepressant medication during the observation period. R62's Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 05/07/2026 documented R62 triggered due to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 5, or their representative with a copy of the bed hold policy, written notification of transfer, and failed to notify the ombudsman when she was transferred to the hospital. The facility failed to ensure the Notice of Transfer to Hospital form included the required rights to appeal and the ombudsman information. Findings included:1. R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded a Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) for an unplanned discharge to an acute hospital with a return anticipated on 04/30/2026.R5's Entry MDS dated 05/06/2026 recorded a reentry to the facility from an acute setting.R5's EMR lacked documentation the facility provided the bed hold, notice of transfer, and notification to the ombudsman for R5's transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. Upon request, the facility was unable to provide.R5's Entry MDS dated 05/06/26 recorded a reentry to the facility from an acute setting.2.R9's EMR recorded a Discharge MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement effective person-centered interventions to prevent falls for two residents. Resident (R)38, who had three falls with staff, and R1, whose fall interventions were not implemented. Findings included:- R38's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body), reduced mobility, muscle weakness, and absence of the right upper limb.The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R38 had intact cognition. R38 required substantial staff assistance for oral hygiene, personal hygiene, mobility, transfers, and upper body dressing. R38 had upper body functional impairment on one side, lower body functional impairment, had no falls, and did not ambulate.The Quarterly MDS, dated 05/29/2026, documented R38 had intact cognition. R38 was dependent on staff for transfers, toileting, hygiene, and substantial assistance with mobility, upper-body dressing, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to collaborate care and services provided by the facility with the care and services provided by hospice for Resident (R)11. Findings included:- R11's Electronic Health Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of senile degeneration of the brain (the progressive deterioration of brain cells and their connections, leading to cognitive decline and behavioral changes in older adults), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body), pain, and adult failure to thrive (includes not doing well, feeling poorly, wight loss, and poor self-care that could be seen in elderly individuals). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R11 had severely impaired cognition. R11 was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS documented R11 received hospice services.R11's 06/22/2026 Care Plan included the following interventions for R11:09/15/2025- administer medications for comfort before an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement adequate infection control practices related to sanitary storage of respiratory supplies and hand hygiene during wound care for Resident (R) 4. Findings included:- On 06/22/2026 at 07:55 AM, during the facility walk through, R20's nasal cannula laid on his bed, R20's nasal cannula (a lightweight, flexible device that delivers supplemental oxygen directly into your nose) was not stored in a sanitary container. R20's nebulizer mask (a device that changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) laid uncovered on her bedside table, R20's nebulizer was not stored in a sanitary container. R68's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP- ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep the airway open during sleep) mask laid on the bottom of her bed, R68's feet laid on the CPAP mask. R68's CPAP mask was not stored in a sanitary container. On 06/23/2026 at 08:55 AM, Consultant GG and her assistant entered R4's room and put on a gown. Licensed Nurse (LN) G was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 64 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with four reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from accident hazards for Resident (R) 6 when staff did not use the right type of slide board for R6, who had a previous staff-assisted fall using a slide board. The facility further failed to address the risk after a staff-assisted fall. The facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from accident hazards for R10, who had large openings in the side rails presenting a risk for entrapment. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for R47 who had medications stored on her bookshelf, and for R52 who did not wear a smoke apron as per her plan of care while smoking. These failures placed the affected residents at risk for preventable accidents and related injuries. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R6 documented diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$39,118 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $39,118 — penalty dated 2024-01-23
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-13 for 3 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES — 29 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $506K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS