North Ridge Health And Rehab
5430 Boone Avenue North, New Hope, MN 55428 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 320 certified beds · (763) 592-2600 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (87) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $25,480 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-07)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.0% | 18.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.9% | 4.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.5% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 2.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.4% | 4.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 4.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 25.8% | 20.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.8% | 12.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.6% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.9% | 5.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.5% | 24.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.0% | 17.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.7% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 72.3% | 82.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.7% | 23.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.9% | 14.8% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.90 | 1.61 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.36 | 1.90 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 218 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 122 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.5%CMS range 38.5–53.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.1%CMS range 10.5–17.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 83.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 94.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.8%CMS range 5.7–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.17 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 320 beds and averages 231.4 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 89 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.23 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.39 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.42 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.50 to 1.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
87 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 76 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's advance directives were accurately and consistently documented in the resident's paper chart, electronic medical record (EMR) banner, Provider Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST), and physician orders to ensure the resident's wishes would be followed in the event of a respiratory or cardiac arrest. This resulted in immediate jeopardy for 1 of 49 residents (R43) whose code status was not accurately documented and was reviewed for advanced directives. In addition the facility failed to ensure the power of attorney (POA) was identified and would be contacted for care decisions for 1 or 49 residents (R223) who was reviewed for resident rights regarding decisions about care. The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE], when R43 signed an updated POLST indicating wishes were cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the event of a cardiac arrest. In contrast, the physician's order and banner in R43's chart indicated R43 was DNR status.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for 7 of 7 residents (R28, R124, R128, R197, R233, R244, R257) when meals were served on hard plastic trays in the dining room. Further, the facility failed to ensure resident's right to privacy and dignity for 1 of 1 residents (R2) when staff failed to knock and wait for permission before entering the resident's room. Findings include: R28's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R28 had intact cognition, and an admission date of 10/24/25. R124's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated R124 had severely impaired cognition, no hallucinations or delusions, and an admission date of 11/21/18. R128's annual MDS, dated [DATE], indicated R128 had short-term and long-term memory issues, severely impaired daily decision making, and an admission date of 11/13/20. R197's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated R128 had intact cognition, and an admission date of 11/25/25. R233's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide written information on the duration of the bed-hold and reserve bed payment at the time of transfer for 4 of 4 residents (R21, R147, R203, R260) reviewed for hospitalizations.Findings include: R21's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R21 with intact cognition, and diagnoses included diabetes, heart disease, kidney disease, and partial amputation of left foot. R21's Clinical Assessment screen identified transferred to the hospital on 6/8/26. R21's electronic medical record (EMR) lacked evidence bed holds were offered, signed, and followed up on. During an interview on 6/22/26 at 11:46 a.m., R21 stated he had never been offered or signed a bed hold form when he transferred to the hospital, and stated, No one from here reached out to me. R147's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R147 had intact cognition and diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, quadriplegia, and R147 required suctioning and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure controlled substance reconciliation was completed in accordance with established policies and procedures to reduce the risk of diversion and/or theft on 2 of 8 medication carts reviewed. This had the potential to affect 8 residents identified to have controlled substances in the reviewed carts.Findings include: During an observation and interview on 6/23/26 at 1:54 p.m., the 2W far south medication cart was reviewed with registered nurse (RN)-A. The mobile cart was locked with a physical key, along with a separately attached metal narcotic box, which was also locked. The narcotic box was opened and contained numerous controlled substances. RN-A explained that the narcotics and controlled substances were counted at each shift exchange, and these reconciliations were recorded on a Narcotic Shift to Shift Signature form. RN-A provided the flow sheets used to track the documented count(s). However, approximately half of the signature spaces were blank. RN-A confirmed the form had approximately half of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served in a timely manner to preserve desired temperatures of food for 5 of 5 residents (R3, R28, R156, R197, R294) reviewed who expressed concerns for food temperatures and palatability. Findings include: R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/16/26, identified R3 had intact cognition with an admission date of 11/13/24. During an interview on 6/24/26 at 10:23 a.m., R3 stated she ate in the main dining room on 2W, and she had brought up the concern of cold food to staff previously. R28's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 5/31/26, identified R28 had intact cognition with an admission date of 10/24/25. During an interview on 6/24/26 at 10:23 a.m., R28 stated the food was always cold. It didn't make a difference if you ate in your room or in the dining room. R28 stated he ate in both places and had brought up the concern of cold food to staff previously. R156's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 5/25/26, identified R156 had intact cognition with an admission date of 2/18/26. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to obtain consent for use of psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 residents (R9) reviewed for unnecessary medicationsFindings include: R9's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R9 had severe cognitive impairment, required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), and diagnoses included edema, dementia, hypertension, insomnia and encephalopathy (broad term for any disease, damage, or malfunction that affects the brain). R9's Order Summary Report, printed 6/25/26, indicated R9 had an order dated 4/13/26 for trazodone 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth at bedtime for insomnia. However, review of R9's medical record lacked evidence consent for trazadone was obtained prior to use. During an interview on 6/25/26 at 10:56 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-I stated nurses were expected to complete a form for consent when a psychotropic medication was ordered. RN-I stated a nurse could initially get verbal consent but then needed to have the form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to assess resident for safety and the ability to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 resident (R21) reviewed for self-administration of medications (SAM). Findings include: R21's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R21 was cognitively intact, and diagnoses included diabetes, heart disease, and kidney disease. R21's physician progress note, dated [DATE], identified R21 medication order for nystatin ointment 100000 unit/gram to groin and intergluteal cleft (the deep vertical groove between the buttocks) topically two times a day for fungal rash/dry skin, and with every brief change. R21's electronic medical record (EMR) identified physician orders for nystatin ointment was discontinued on [DATE]. During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 3:37 p.m., R21 had a nearly empty tube of prescription nystatin ointment, with label attached listing R21's name, and instructions for use as indicated on the [DATE] medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to accommodate resident needs by ensuring a call light was accessible for 2 of 2 residents (R221, R283) reviewed for call lights.Findings include: R221's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R221 was cognitively intact, and diagnoses included diagnoses of neurogenic bladder, diabetes, and schizophrenia. Additionally, R221 had impairment on one side of upper and lower extremities, required a walker and wheelchair for mobility, and required substantial assistance for dressing and hygiene. During an observation and interview on 6/25/26 at 8:37 a.m., R221 was seated in a wheelchair in her room, facing her bed with the bedside table between her and her bed. R221's call light was wrapped around the upper bedrail of the bed and out of reach. R221 was unable to access her call light, and stated, it is too far away. R221 attempted to move her wheelchair around the bed stand but was unable to move. Licensed practical nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing assessment and evaluation of physical restraints were completed to determine continued need, risks, benefits, and least restrictive interventions for a wheelchair lap tray and set belt for 1 of 1 resident (R147) reviewed for physical restraints. Findings include:R147's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R147 had intact cognition and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R147's diagnoses included quadriplegia (paralysis affecting all four extremities), muscle weakness, lack of coordination (difficulty controlling body movements), and abnormalities of gait and mobility (difficulty with movement and positioning). The MDS further identified R147 did not use restraints.During an observation on 6/22/26 at 5:16 p.m., R147 was seated in his wheelchair with a seat belt secured and a lap tray attached to the wheelchair.During an observation on 6/25/26 at 11:05 a.m., R147 propelled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were used in accordance with professional standards by failing to ensure PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication orders were limited to 14 days or contained documented clinical rationale and/or practitioner evaluation to support continued use beyond 14 days. The facility also failed to ensure monitoring was implemented to identify potential adverse effects related to antipsychotic medication use, including orthostatic blood pressure monitoring, for 1 of 5 resident (R152) reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:R152's Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/28/26, identified R152 had intact cognition, and diagnoses included respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and tracheostomy status. The MDS further identified R152 received antipsychotic and antianxiety medications.R152's physician orders, dated 6/22/26, included lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth every six hours as needed (PRN) for anxiety, with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded, with the potential for inaccurate federal reimbursement and resident care planning for 3 of 3 residents (R12, R15, R123) reviewed for MDS accuracy.Findings include: R12's readmission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/20/26 indicated R12 had not had any falls in the month prior to admission/re-admission, and indicated R12 had not had any fractures related to a fall in the 6 months prior to admission/re-admission. R12's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 6/22/26, indicated R12 had no falls in the previous 90 days. R12's care plan indicated R12 was at risk for falls related to cognition, unsteady gait and weakness. The care plan further indicated a fall with fractured hip on 3/9/26. During an interview on 6/25/26 at 11:17 a.m., licensed practical nurse manager (LPN)-A stated R12's readmission MDS assessment dated [DATE], and quarterly MDS assessments were inaccurate due to R12's fall with hip…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 76 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine personal hygiene and grooming (i.e., shaving) was provided to 1 of 1 residents (R12) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) who were dependent on staff for their care.Findings include:R12's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/6/26, indicated R12 was cognitively intact, required partial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene, and had not refused or rejected cares.R12's care plan, reviewed 6/24/26, indicated R12 required the assistance of one staff for personal hygiene.During an observation and interview on 6/22/26 at 2:04 p.m., R12 had scruffy facial hair, approximately 3/4 of an inch long, covering his face and neck. R12 stated he preferred to be clean shaven. An electric razor was plugged into the wall on the floor next to R12's bed.During an observation on 6/23/26 at 10:27 a.m., R12 continued to have scruffy facial hair covering his face and neck.During an observation on 6/23/26 at 3:15 p.m., R12 had scruffy facial and neck hair present, and the electric shaver…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented to prevent further falls and potential injury for 1 of 3 residents (R6) reviewed for falls. Additionally, the facility failed to comprehensively assess to prevent potential injury for 1 of 1 residents (R44) reviewed for smoking. Findings include: R6's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R6 was cognitively intact, had not rejected cares, was independent with activities of daily living (ADLs), and diagnoses included arthritis and depression. R6's progress note, dated 5/14/26 at 5:13 a.m., indicated that R6 slid from bed and was found on the floor with no injuries observed. R6's fall risk management, dated 5/14/26, indicated R6 had fallen out of bed and was found on her bedside floor by staff. The report indicated R6 stated she was rolling in her bed when she had fallen. The report indicated R6 thought the bed was too small, causing her to fall off her bed, and R6 was given a new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate provider orders were obtained to maintain an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 1 residents (R246) reviewed for catheter care.Findings include: R246's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] indicated R246 had moderate cognitive impairment, required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), and diagnoses included diabetes, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, dementia, and myelodysplastic syndrome (type of cancer in which the bone marrow does not make enough healthy blood cells). R246's Order Summary identified an order dated 6/4/26, for an indwelling (foley) caterer for comfort. However, the order failed to indicate the catheter size and balloon size needed for catheter replacement. R246's treatment administration record (TAR), dated 6/1/26 to 6/30/26 indicated an order for an indwelling (foley) catheter for comfort. However, the orders failed to include catheter size and balloon size needed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure timely and effective interventions were implemented for significant, unplanned weight loss and failed to ensure consistency between physician orders and care plan directives related to weight monitoring for 1 of 1 residents (R256) reviewed for weight loss. Findings include:R256's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/25/26, indicated R256 had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs), including feeding, and had a diagnosis of weight loss. R256 received a mechanically altered diet and was not on a prescribed weight-loss regimen.R256's physician order, dated 5/1/23, indicated an order for monthly weights. Additional orders included a house supplement shake 4 oz twice daily, initiated 1/9/24, for nutritional supplementation and ProStat Advanced Wound Care Liquid daily, initiated, 6/27/25 for wound healing.R256's weight records indicated R256 weighed 153.2 pounds (lbs) on 4/3/26 and 127 lbs on 6/3/26. These weights indicated a weight loss of 26.2 lbs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care and services were provided according to professional standards of practice and physician orders when the facility failed to ensure tracheostomy orders, included the specific type and size of tracheostomy tube, for 2 of 2 residents (R147 and R152) reviewed for tracheostomy care. In addition, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for oxygen therapy, including prescribed flow rate and administration parameters, for 1 of 3 residents (R152) reviewed for oxygen therapy, and the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered according to physician orders for 1 of 3 residents (R14) reviewed for oxygen therapy.Findings included:R14R14's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R14 had intact cognition and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R14's diagnoses included respiratory failure, tracheostomy status (a surgically created opening in the neck to assist with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological pain interventions were offered, implemented, and documented when administering as-needed pain medication for 1 of 1 resident (R142) reviewed for pain management.Findings include: R142's diagnoses list, dated 6/12/26, included malignant neoplasm of the prostate with secondary malignant neoplasms of the bone, lung, and lymph nodes, and neoplasm-related pain. R142's Pain Assessment Instrument (PAINAD), dated 6/14/26, documented R142 had no pain. R142's pain assessment, dated 6/16/26, indicated R142 was cognitively intact and had experienced frequent pain during the previous five days. R142's physician orders, dated 6/12/26, included the following as needed (PRN) medications for pain: hydromorphone 8 milligrams (mg) every 2 hours PRN for pain, ibuprofen 600mg every 8 hours PRN for pain, methocarbamol [PHONE NUMBER]mg every 6 hours PRN for muscle spasms, and baclofen 2.5mg two times daily PRN for muscle pain.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff demonstrated competency by administering the incorrect dose of a controlled medication and inaccurately documenting controlled substance administration for 1 of 3 residents (R142) reviewed for medication administration. Findings include:R142's diagnoses list, dated 6/12/26, included malignant neoplasm of the prostate with secondary malignant neoplasms of the bone, lung, and lymph nodes, and neoplasm-related pain.R142's physician orders, dated 6/12/26, included an order for Methadone HCl 10 milligram (mg) tablets - 50 milligrams (mg) every morning, 20 mg daily (midday), and 40 mg at bedtime for pain. During observation on 6/24/26 at 8:15 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-D entered R142's room to administer scheduled medications. During the medication pass, R142 requested as-needed pain medication and LPN-D why there were only two pain pills in his medication cup as he should have five pills. LPN-D told R142 that the medication cup contained his morning dose.Review of R142's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure recommendations from the consulting pharmacist were acted upon timely to reduce the risk of adverse effects for 1 of 5 residents (R9) reviewed for unnecessary medication use.Findings include: R9's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R9 had severe cognitive impairment, required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), and diagnoses included edema, dementia, hypertension, insomnia and encephalopathy (broad term for any disease, damage, or malfunction that affects the brain). R9's Pharmacy Consultation Report, dated 5/19/26, indicated the facility needed to obtain a psychotropic consent for a new order of trazadone (a psychotropic medication) for insomnia. Additionally, the report indicated the facility needed to monitor R9's sleep while R9 received trazadone. However, R9's medical record lacked evidence that the facility obtained psychotropic consent for R9's trazodone. Additionally, R9's medical record lacked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring was completed for 1 of 5 residents (R255) reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include: R255's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R255 had severe cognitive impairment, required substantial assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), and diagnoses included hypertension, chronic kidney disease, dementia, diabetes, and anxiety. R255's order summary report, printed 6/25/26, included an order dated 5/12/26 for metoprolol succinate extended release 50 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time daily, hold for systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 100 or heart rate (HR) less than 60. R255's medication administration records (MAR) for May 2026 and June 2026, indicated R255's blood pressure was monitored. However, R255's MARs failed to indicate R255's heart rate was monitored and recorded as per provider order. During an interview on 6/25/26 at 10:56 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-I stated staff were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to coordinate blood draws as ordered by the provider for 1 of 2 residents (R25) reviewed for dialysis.Findings include:R25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, completed on 5/12/26, indicated R25 was cognitively intact, was able to communicate wishes to others, understood others, and diagnoses included renal insufficiency with dependence on dialysis and anemia.R25's progress note on 6/8/26, at 1:56 p.m., indicated a call was received from the lab to alert facility R25 had a critical lab value of hemoglobin (hgb-the oxygen carrying cells in the blood) was low at 6.9 (normal hemoglobin level is 12 - 16). The note indicated that the provider was updated. The progress notes lacked indication of subsequent blood draws following the last blood draw on 6/15/26.During interview on 6/22/26 at 1:19 p.m., R25 stated he felt good and denied any symptoms of nausea or vomiting, although stated he was tired after dialysis. R25 stated he had his Hgb checked while at dialysis and his most recent lab value was at 8.2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure oral health needs were met for 1 of 1 residents (R2) reviewed for denture fit and function resulting in the resident not consistently receiving or using dentures despite documented issues with improper fit and the resident's expressed desire to use them. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure routine dental service recommendations were followed to promote oral hygiene and reduce the risk of complications for 1 of 1 residents (R21) reviewed for dental services.Findings include:R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/6/26 indicated R2 was cognitively intact and required partial to moderate assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs). R2's dental note, dated 10/1/24, documented R2's dentures did not fit properly and required adjustment, with the provider noting additional adjustments may be needed as the resident continued to adapt to new dentures. R2's MDS oral/dental assessment, dated 12/22/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control practices by ensuring staff performed hand hygiene and changed gloves between contaminated and clean resident care tasks during incontinent care for 1 of 1 residents (R142) reviewed for incontinence care.Findings include:R142's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was in progress following admission to the facility on 6/12/26.R142's diagnoses, dated 6/12/26, included malignant neoplasm of the prostate with secondary malignant neoplasms of the bone, lung, and lymph nodes, and neoplasm-related pain.R142's pain assessment, dated 6/16/26, indicated R142 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 and had experienced frequent pain during the previous five days.R142's care plan, dated 6/12/26, indicated the resident had a self-care deficit related to a diagnosis of cancer and required moderate assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs). During observation on 6/24/26 at 8:32 a.m., Nursing Assistant (NA)-F provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to use the correct brand sling for Hoyer (full-body mechanical lift) in accordance with manufacturer's instructions for (R1) who had a fall from a lift and failed to ensure comprehensive assessments for Hoyer sling sizes completed according to manufactures recommendations and failed to ensure the sling size was represented on the care plan for 2 of 2 residents (R1, R2) who required Hoyer lifts for transfers. In addition, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive harness assessments were completed to ensure safe transfers for 3 of 3 residents (R3, R4, R5) who required the sit-to-stand mechanical lift for transfers.Findings include:R1R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified R1 had moderate cognitive impairment and no behaviors or rejection of care. R1 had an impairment to one side of upper and lower extremity and was dependent on staff with wheelchair mobility and transfers. The MDS identified R1 had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and document review the facility failed to comprehensively develop and implement care plan interventions for 1 of 3 residents (R2) when R2 required in-center hemodialysis (also known as dialysis) (going to a dialysis center for therapy that filters your blood outside your body using a machine and a manufactured filter) three days a week. Findings include:R2's Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with intact cognition, diagnoses included renal (kidney) insufficiency, and required dialysis. R2's provider orders dated 1/27/26, indicated dialysis three times weekly and directed nurses to complete a post-dialysis assessment on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. On 1/29/26, the provider orders were modified to complete the post-dialysis assessments on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays instead. R2's care plan reviewed 4/30/26 lacked a focus area and interventions for dialysis treatment. During an interview on 5/1/26 at 2:16 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis, failed to ensure staff was knowledgeable about providing care, and failed to ensure the medical record reflected accurate care and monitoring of the dialysis access site for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for dialysis. Findings include:R2's Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with intact cognition, diagnoses that included renal (kidney) insufficiency, and required dialysis. R2's provider orders dated 1/27/26, indicated hemodialysis three times weekly, and nurses would complete a post-dialysis assessment on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. On 1/29/26, the provider orders were modified to complete the post-dialysis assessments on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays instead.R2's care plan reviewed 4/30/26 lacked a focus area and interventions for dialysis treatment. R2's progress notes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for one of one resident (R2) when R2 had an order for Oxycodone 10 milligrams (mg) with instructions to separate the doses by a minimum of four hours and to separate doses from Suboxone by a minimum of two hours. The facility failed to follow these instructions 12 times between 10/10/25 and 10/27/25. The facility also failed to ensure medications were given within one hour before the scheduled administration time to one hour after the scheduled administration time. Between 10/1/25 and 10/31/25, the facility failed to ensure medications were given within one hour of the scheduled administration time to one hour after the scheduled administration time 360 times. These deficiencies had the potential to impact all resident's in the facility. R2's admission record dated 12/3/25 indicated R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of acute and subacute infective endocarditis.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document turning and repositioning for one of one resident (R2) reviewed when R2's care plan stated she would be turned and repositioned every two hours and the staff stated they do not document when a resident is turned and reposition nor could recall turning and repositioning R2.R2's admission record dated 12/3/25 indicated R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of acute and subacute infective endocarditis. R2's additional diagnoses included pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, displaced bicondylar fracture of left tibia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, other lack of coordination, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit, peripheral vascular disease, and personal history of other venous thrombosis and embolism. R2 was discharged from the facility on 11/21/25. R2's care plan dated 9/19/25 indicated R2 would be repositioned every two hours to facilitate lung secretion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to promote dignity for 2 of 3 residents (R3, R6) who required assistance with toileting and staff did not respond timely to requests for assistance with toileting and toileting hygiene, which resulted in incontinence or not getting changed timely.Findings include:R3R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, a urinary catheter (removed [DATE]), incontinence of bowel, full dependence upon staff for transfers, and an inability to walk. R3's care plan dated [DATE], indicated a risk for falls, keep the call light in reach, bowel incontinence, care in pairs, and prompt response to all requests for assistance. Additionally, the care plan dated [DATE], indicated R3 was resistive to care and would yell at staff to leave the room.R3's progress notes indicated many refusals of care including lab work and medications, and further indicated R3 was verbally abusive to staff, yelling at them, and kicking them out of the room when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement resident-directed care and treatment consistent with provider orders and professional standards for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for supplemental oxygen use.Findings include:R2's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified moderately impaired cognition with diagnoses which include acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). R2 utilized oxygen therapy while at the facility.R2's provider order dated 12/18/24, instructed staff to apply continuous oxygen at 2 liters per minute (lpm) by nasal cannula to maintain oxygen saturations above 90% with a frequency check of every shift. Required supplementary documentation included oxygen saturations.R2's care plan dated 7/10/25, instructed staff to administer oxygen according to provider order.Review of R2's vital signs documentation from 5/8/25, through 7/10/25, revealed R2's oxygen saturation had been checked once on 5/8/25, 5/15/25, 5/22/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 3 (R3) residents reviewed for supplemental oxygen use. Findings include:R3's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition with diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease and heart failure. R3 did not use oxygen therapy at the facility.R3's provider order list dated 7/10/25, lacked an order for supplemental oxygen use and monitoring.R3's care plan lacked information regarding supplemental oxygen use.Review of R3's vital signs documentation from 5/1/25 through 7/10/25, revealed R3 utilized oxygen via nasal cannula (NC) on six days in July, at least 17 days in June (9 days there was no information documented), and 11 days in May starting on 5/16/25 (3 days there was no information documented).A nursing note dated 6/2/25, indicated R3 utilized 2 liters per minute (L) of supplemental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespreadMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete wireless call system in which staff were provided with functioning devices alerting them to call light activation in their possession. This had the potential to affect all 250 residents at the facility. Findings include: During an observation on 3/5/25 at 2:35 p.m., it was noted there were no call light indicators above the resident rooms on the East side in hallways 500, 600, or 700. At about the middle of each hall there were two scrolling kiosks of about two feet in length and five inches tall, suspended from the ceiling in facing opposite ways. The kiosk displayed the resident room and bed number of the resident who had activated their call light. During an interview on 3/5/25 at 2:45 p.m., nursing assistant (NA)-E stated she knew when a resident call light went off by the kiosk in the hallway. NA-E stated the NAs didn't carry a pager or anything that alerted her a call light had gone off. NA-E also stated they didn't carry any type of communication, if they were in a room with a resident and needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the emergency kits were tracked to prevent potential theft and diversion of medications. This had the potential to affect all residents residing on the nursing unit. Findings include: During a tour on 3/5/25 at 11:48 a.m., with registered nurse (RN)-E of the medication room for the 500 wing the refrigerator had an insulin kit with lorazepam (a benzodiazepine [controlled substance] medication used to treat anxiety) one bottle 2 milligrams per milliliter (mg/ml). RN-E verified the kit was not part of the narcotic count at the change of shift and the box was not secured in the refrigerator. On 3/7/25 at 8:41 a.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated the emergency kit with insulin and lorazepam did not need to be counted at the shift change because the kit was secured with a green tab that only pharmacy could replace. The DON did however, state when the narcotic count was done staff should have been laying eyes on the box because it wasn't secured in the refrigerator. The facility policy Controlled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure they were free of a medication error rate of five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 22.58 % with 7 errors out of 31 opportunities for error involving 4 of 9 residents (R309, R193, R183, R38) who were observed during the medication passes. Findings include: R309's admission Record dated 3/7/25, identified R309 had diagnoses which included rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic inflammatory disorder usually affecting small joints in the hands and feet), systemic lupus erythematosus (an illness that occurs when the immune system attacks healthy tissues and organs) , and protein-calorie malnutrition. R309's Active Orders as of 3/7/25, identified R309 had an order for calcium carbonate-vitamin D with minerals - give one tablet by mouth two times a day. On 3/3/25 at 5:10 p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-C brought R309 calcium carbonate 500 plus D, LPN-C verified the expiration date on the bottle was 12/2024, and that the medication was expired. R193's admission Record dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure insulin pens were dated when opened and dated with an expiration date for 13 residents (R4, R92, R166, R105, R114, R202, R85, R101, R196, R189, R206, R720, R462) and outdated medications were removed and disposed of properly in 8 of 10 medication carts. In addition, the facility failed to ensure supplies were not outdated, discharged resident medications were properly disposed of for (R721, R722), and medication temperatures were within safe temperature ranges for 8 residents (R2, R29, R71, R30, R91, R92, R109, R149), in 4 of 5 medication rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents receiving medications from these medication carts and medication rooms. Findings include: During a tour on [DATE] at 2:06 p.m., with registered nurse (RN)-G at the 3 North medication cart, an aspart insulin pen (rapid-acting insulin used to treat type 1 and type 2 diabetes) for R4 with an open date of [DATE], and no expiration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and/or standard precautions were followed to reduce the risk of infection to others for 2 of 3 residents (R611, R612) reviewed for EBP during tracheal care. In addition, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed regarding tracheal suctioning for 1 of 3 (R612) reviewed for tracheal care. The facility also failed to ensure proper hand sanitization occured during cares for 1 of 3 residents (R97) standard precautions. Also, the facility failed to follow clean procedures when administering tube feedings for 1 of 2 residents (R90) reviewerd for tube feedings. The CDC article titled Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs) dated 4/2/24, indicated MDRO transmission in skilled nursing facilities was common and contributed to substantial resident morbidity. EBP is an infection control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a call light that accommodated the resident's needs or an acceptable alternative, was provided or implemented to promote safety and allow for means of notification for 1 of 1 residents (R190) reviewed for the accommodation of needs. Findings include: R190's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R190 had a functional limitation in the range of motion of both upper extremities and was dependent on staff for almost all his activities of daily living (ADL) needs. R190's care plan dated 5/15/24, indicated R190 had a communication problem related to his tracheostomy (surgical hole in the windpipe), and his call light was to be within reach. The care plan did not discuss what type of call light R190 needed. R190's care plan dated 9/24/24 indicated R190 utilized mittens on his right hand to prevent pulling on his catheter and tracheostomy, and R190 had left-sided weakness. R190's census report dated 3/1/25, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure family requested pretreatment of nausea occured prior to meals for 1 of 1 residents (R97) reviewed for self-determination. Findings include: R97 significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R97 was severely cognitively impaired. Section O. indicated R97 had been admitted to hospice care. R97's diagnoses included arthritis and non-Alzheimer dementia. R97's careplan last updated 2/25/25, indicated R97 had been admitted to hospice. Palliative care goals included optimize treatment and control of physical symptoms such as anorexia, nausea and vomiting. R97's Order Summary Report Active orders as of 3/6/25 included the following order: Ondansetron oral tablet disintegrating 4mg give one tablet sublingually two times a day for nausea vomiting. 1 tab under the tongue before meals and at bedtime. R97's Medication Administration Records (MAR) for February and March showed that R97's ondansetron had been scheduled to give at 4:00 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing monitoring and assessments of the resident ' s condition during restraint use were completed to decrease the likelihood of adverse outcomes of restraint use (skin breakdown, injury from attempts to free self, decline in physical functioning, etc.) and failed to complete a comprehensive assessment and/or re-assessment to determine if the least restrictive device (restraint mitt) was used or determine if the restraint was effective when 1 of 2 residents (R190) reviewed for restraint use, was found to be able to self-decannulate his tracheostomy tube while the restraint was in place. Findings include: R190's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R190 had a functional limitation in the range of motion of both upper extremities and was dependent on staff for almost all his activities of daily living (ADL) needs. The MDS indicated that physical restraints were not used on R190. R190's care plan dated 5/15/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to initiate and complete a Significate Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) for 1 of 1 resident (R42) after a physical and cognitive decline following a stroke. Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual (RAI manual) indicates the SCSA is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed when the IDT has determined that a resident meets the significant change guidelines. A significant change is a major decline in resident status that will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff, impacts more than one area of the resident's health status and requires interdisciplinary review and/or revision of the care plan. R42's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R42 had severe cognitive impairment, significant weight loss, a mechanically altered diet, upper and lower extremity impairment on one side and 2 or more falls since readmission to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on inteview, obsersavation and document review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and maintained to ensure appropriate care was provided for 1 of 1 resident (R86) reviewed for care needs (i.e. interventions and identfication of pressure ulcer/laundry/preference of care giver/communication ability/ambulation ability). R86's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/15/25, indicated R86 had severely impaired cognition with no hallucinations or delusions present, no behaviors and no rejection of care. R86 required moderate staff assistance with showering, lower body dressing, footwear, transfers from bed/chair/toilet/shower and personal hygiene. R86 required set up assistance from staff for oral hygiene and supervision for toileting hygiene. Furthermore, Section M skin conditions indicated R86 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers and indicated R86 had one stage 2 pressure ulcer (partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide timely and quarterly care conferences for 3 of 4 residents (R184, R224, R146) reviewed for care planning. Findings include: R184: R184's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R184 was cognitively intact. Diagnoses included cancer, gastroesophageal reflux disease and post-traumatic stress disorder Review of R184's progress notes indicated a staff member with Anoka County requested a care conference on 11/18/24. Review of R184's care conference forms and progress notes identified care conferences were held on 1/24/25, 5/6/24 and 1/30/24. The care conference forms, and progress notes lacked a documented care conference around 11/24 as requested by Anoka County. During an interview on 3/3/25 at 6:29 p.m., R17 stated there is never an invite sent for care conferences and was not sure when the last care conference occurred. During an interview on 3/5/25 at 10:42 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-R stated care conferences were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 9 residents (R21, R28) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) and who were dependent on staff for their ADLs, routinely had their fingernails cleaned and trimmed. Findings include: R21's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute and chronic respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease (CKD). R21's MDS identified the need for moderate assistance with bathing, dressing, and toileting. R21's provider orders dated 1/30/25, identified an order for a weekly bath on Fridays including nail care and shaving. R21's care plan dated 2/6/25, identified the need for extensive assistance with bathing but didn't specifically address nail care. During an observation on 3/4/25 at 8:56 a.m., R21's fingernails were noted to be about one-eighth of an inch long with dark matter underneath all of them. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to compressively reassess a resident for activity interest and socialization needs after hospitalization for a stroke for 1 of 2 residents (R42) reviewed for activities who was no longer able to communicate verbally with other residents and move around the facility independently. Findings include: R42's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R42 had severe cognitive impairment, significant weight loss, lower and upper extremity impairment to one side and required substantial to maximum assistance with toileting and bathing. The MDS further indicated R42 had been admitted to the care facility on 4/1/15. R42's progress notes dated 11/1/24 - 3/7/25, indicated R42 was hospitalized on [DATE] - 1/10/25 for a stroke with right sided weakness. R42's care plan revised 7/25/24, indicated R42 preferred to be to be in room engaging in independent activities or going outside or fresh air rather than going to group programs offered. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure orders were current and accurate for 1 of 1 resident (R90) reviewed for orders. In addition, facility failed to ensure site care was performed for 1 of 2 residents (R4) reviewed for tube feeding Findings include: R90's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R90 had diagnoses which included intestinal malabsorption (a condition that prevents absorption of nutrients through the small intestine), gastrostomy tube status (a flexible, hollow tub inserted through the abdominal wall and into the stomach), malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), anxiety, and depression. R90 was cognitively intact and independent with activities of daily living. R90's Order Summary Report dated 3/7/25, identified R90 had orders that included the following: Two liter fluid restriction every shift start date 11/13/24, order status active Antibiotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow identifed pressure relieving interventions, to timely identify a wound as a pressure ulcer and failed to follow care plan interventions to promote healing and prevent worsening of a pressure ulcer for 1 of 4 residents (R4) reviewed for pressure ulcer care. Findings include: R4's re-admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R4 was moderately cognitively impaired and was at risk of developing pressure ulcers but did not have any unhealed pressure ulcers at the time of admission and advised pressure reducing devices for R4's chair and bed. Hospital provider notes dated 12/30/24, identified R4 as having a stage 3 pressure ulcer [defined as full-thickness loss of skin in which adipose (fat) tissue is visible. Undermining and tunneling may occur. Fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, and cartilage are not viewable. If slough or eschar obscures the extent of tissue loss this is an unstageable pressure injury] Nursing progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a nursing functional maintenance program was implemented to prevent a possible decline in range of motion (ROM) for 1 of 6 residents (R190) reviewed for range of motion. Findings include: R190's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R190 had a functional limitation in the range of motion of both upper extremities and was dependent on staff for almost all his activities of daily living (ADL) needs. R190's care plan dated 2/25/25, indicated R190 had a functional maintenance program to prevent furthering of his contractures and to prevent skin breakdown. The care plan indicated the nursing assistants (NA)s were to complete bilateral lower extremity ankle and knee ROM with R190. R190's Functional Maintenance Program (FMP) dated 2/18/25, indicated nursing staff were to complete bilateral lower extremity ankle and knee ROM with R190 daily, and the program was signed by physical therapist (PT)-A. R190's medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R90) who was observed using an electric heating pad, was free of potential injury. Findings include: R90's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R90 had diagnoses which included intestinal malabsorption (a condition that prevents absorption of nutrients through the small intestine), gastrostomy tube status (a flexible, hollow tub inserted through the abdominal wall and into the stomach), diabetes mellitus, heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), anxiety, depression, hypothyroidism, and insomnia. R90 was cognitively intact and independent with activities of daily living. R90's Order Summary Report dated 3/7/25, did not identify any orders for a heating pad or heat therapy. A review of R90's care plan dated 10/25/24, identified R90 had a potential for pressure ulcer development related to disease process. Interventions included the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions were taken to reduce the risk of aspiration for 2 of 2 residents (R4, R129) reviewed who used a tube feeding and was observed to be positioned flat in bed while their feeding was running. In addition, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention practices were followed and tube feeding was administered at the ordered flow rate for 1 of 2 residents (R4) reviewed for tube feeding administration. Findings include: R4's re-admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R4 was moderately cognitively impaired and received 51% or greater of their nutrition by tube feeding. R4's diagnoses included the diagnoses of epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, quadriplegia, diabetes, and sepsis. R4's care plan tube feeding focus area udpated 1/16/15, indicated R4 was receiving nutrition via tube feeding and listed Osmolite 1.5 at 50 ml [milliliters]/hour. Goals included free of aspiration, insertion site will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen order parameters were followed for 1 of 4 residents (R21) and that provider orders for as needed (PRN) oxygen administration were in place for 1 of 4 residents (R204) reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: R21's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute and chronic respiratory failure. R21's MDS also identified continuous oxygen therapy. R21's provider orders dated 1/30/25, identified an order for oxygen at 3.5 liters per minute via nasal cannula to keep oxygen saturation levels greater than or equal to 90%. Review of R21's care plan dated 1/31/25, identified altered respiratory status related to chronic respiratory failure and COPD with an intervention to provide oxygen as ordered. Review of R21's electronic medical record (EMR) identified oxygen saturation readings from 3/1/25 to 3/6/25 ranging from 92-100%. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based in observation, interview and document review the facility failed to assess a resident for potential trauma, who was found to have vulvar lesions and under went a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner exam, in order to implement any potential interventions to ensure R42 was safe and did not have lasting negative effects for 1 of 1 resident (R42) reviewed for trauma informed care. Findings include: R42's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R42 had severe cognitive impairment, significant weight loss, lower and upper extremity impairment to one side and required substantial to maximum assistance with toileting and bathing. The MDS further indicated R42 had been admitted to the care facility on 4/1/15. R42's progress note dated 12/25/24, indicated R42 was found unresponsive in her room and was transferred to the hospital. R42's progress note dated 1/10/25, indicated R42 arrived back to the facility via stretcher. R42's hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated R10 was hospitalized from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure pharmacy consultant recommendations were followed up on in a timely manner for 2 of 5 residents (R183, R204) reviewed for medication management. Finding included: R183's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R183 had intact cognition. R13's diagnoses included hypertension, renal failure, diabetes mellitus, and depression. R183's consultant pharmacist's medication review reports (CPMR) included the following: - 1/29/25, identified the same recommendation as the one on 9/26/24, because no action was taken. The CPMR was not addressed and signed off until 3/6/25. - 10/22/24, indicated R183 took Aripiprazole (mental health medication) and Reglan (medication for stomach) which could cause involuntary movements of various parts of the body and lacked an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) (assessment to monitor for involuntary movements of the body) had not been documented in the previous 6 months. This CPMR was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a scheduled antifungal medication without an end date was evaluated for the appropriateness of its continued use for 1 of 6 residents (R129) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R129's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R129 had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for their activities of daily living (ADLs). R129's Order Summary Report dated 1/20/25, indicated R129 had an order starting on 4/2/24 with no end date for nystatin (an antifungal medication) powder application to the groin two times a day for a rash. R129's Medication Administration Report (MAR) dated 1/1/25-3/3/25, indicated R129 had received twice daily applications of nystatin powder during this period. R129's Weekly Skin Evaluation dated 2/14/25, included a section where staff could check any of the following skin conditions: skin intact, dry, rash, plaques, callouses, redness, skin tears, blisters, open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed provide appropriate side effect monitoring with antipsychotic medication consumption related to residents who did not have an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) or orthostatic blood pressures for 1 of 3 residents (R183), and the facility failed to provide non pharmaceutical interventions prior to medication use for 1 of 3 residents (R204) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R183's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R183 had intact cognition. Diagnoses included hypertension and renal failure. R183's Order Summary Report (OSR) indicated on 12/16/24 an order was reviewed for Aripiprazole (antipsychotic mental health medication) 5mg orally to be given at night. The OSR also indicated orthostatic blood pressures one time a month for side effect monitoring, started 9/25/24. Lastly the OSR indicated on 9/25/24 an order for antipsychotic side effect monitoring that included side effects of increased…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to accommodate resident needs by ensuring call lights were within reach for 3 of 5 (R3, R4, R5) residents reviewed for call light usage. R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated intact cognition with diagnoses that included dementia, muscle weakness and repeated falls. R3's care plan dated 1/20/25 lacked direction regarding call light usage. On 1/27/25 at 1:13 p.m., R3 was observed seated in her wheelchair with the call light cord lying in a coil on the floor behind her wheelchair. R3 stated she pushed her call light button when she needed help. She could not reach her call light and if she tried to pick it up off the floor, she would probably fall out of her wheelchair. On 1/27/25 at 1:20 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-A confirmed R3's call light button was out of her reach. All residents should have their call lights within reach before a staff person leaves the room. On 1/28/25 at 9:59 a.m., nursing assistant (NA)-B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess a resident's skin condition for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed. R3 was found to have an inflammatory skin condition on both of his hands and elbow that was not identified on R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) and R3's assessments. Findings include: R3's admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] indicated R3's skin condition, temperature, turgor (skin elasticity), and integrity (health of the skin) were all normal. The assessment indicated R3 had redness to his coccyx (tailbone area), necrotic (death of tissues) of his second and third toes, a wound on the left foot and other skin discoloration. The assessment did not indicate where the skin discoloration was located or a description of it. R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R3 had a Brief Inventory of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 indicating R3 was severely cognitively impaired. R3 was dependent upon staff for dressing, grooming, and transferring. R3 did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide timely notification of critical lab results to the physician for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for change in condition. Findings include: R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R3 was cognitively intact, with diagnoses of chronic kidney disease and benign prostatic hyperplasia (age-associated prostate gland enlargement that can cause urination difficulty). R3 required an indwelling urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine), and used anticoagulants (medications used to prevent blood clots from forming). R3's care plan dated 7/8/24 indicated R3 had an indwelling urinary catheter, and staff should monitor for blood-tinged urine. R3's Physician's Orders dated 10/28/24 directed to observe for symptoms of bleeding such as red or dark brown urine, and document unusual findings in the progress notes. R3's laboratory (lab) results dated 10/18/24, indicated R3 had a positive culture for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate catheter care and services to minimize the risk for urinary tract infections for 1 of 3 (R1) residents. Additionally, the facility failed to follow provider's orders when catheter required to be flushed for 1 of 1 (R1) residents reviewed with indwelling catheter. Findings included: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and no behaviors. R1 required partial to moderate assistance for personal hygiene, substantial to maximal assistance for repositioning, upper body dressing, and dependent upon staff for all transfers. R1 was unable to ambulate and used a motorized wheel chair for mobility. R1 had an indwelling urinary catheter and always incontinent of bowel. R1 diagnoses included neurogenic bladder (a condition that affects bladder control due to nerve damage or brain disorders), diabetes mellitus, multiple sclerosis (autoimmune disease in which the insulating covers of the nerve…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience in the locked memory care unit dining room. This had the potential to effect all 36 residents and visitors. Findings include: During observation on 7/8/24 at 5:25 p.m., three residents were eating in the hall outside of the dining room on tray tables next to the nurse's station. Staff would occasionally provide cueing assistance. One resident was sitting in a chair in the corner eating off a knee height side table. Another resident sitting in a chair along the wall eating off a tray table. All spots at the tables in the dining room are utilized by other residents. During observation on 7/10/24 at 8:31 a.m., all residents are served meals on tray tables. All trays are left under the plates during the meal. Food is brought to unit on a cart, which is left in the dining room during the meal service. Three carts are present in the dining room by the door after all residents were served. All residents on the same table are not served at the same time. One resident had her food in front of her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate safety plan was in place to protect residents of the facility while there was an ongoing investigation for an allegation of abuse. This had the ability to effect all residents on the units the allegated perpetrator worked on. Findings include: R145's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R145 had intact cognition and demonstrated no hallucination or delusional behaviors. During an interview on 7/9/24 at 3:34 p.m., R145 stated that a nurse worked on 7/6/24, and did her wound care was excessively rough poking and prodding unnecessarily into her wound causing more pain than usually occurred. R145 felt that the nurses were causing the extra pain on purpose and trying to abuse her physically. This was reported to the administrator so they could investigate the allegation of physical abuse. Review of wound care documentation from 7/6/24, indicated licensed practical nurse (LPN)-E was the nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to include individualized approaches for care, including non-pharmacological interventions to aid in the management of mood and behavior, in the comprehensive care plan for 1 of 5 residents (R67) reviewed for unnecessary medications. In addition, the facility failed to ensure dementia care was incorporated into the care plan for 1 of 2 residents (R184) reviewed for dementia care and failed to ensure accurate orders for 1 of 1 residents (R190) reviewed for range of motion. Findings include: R67: R67's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], included R67 was cognitively intact, had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and depression, and took antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. The MDS indicated R67 did not exhibit any behaviors. R67's provider History and Physical dated [DATE], included R67 had severe major depressive disorder with psychotic features. R67's care plan dated [DATE], included R67 used psychotropic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, comfortable environment for resident on the locked memory care unit. This had the potential to affect all 36 residents, staff and visitors. Findings Include: During interview on 7/8/24 at 1:42 p.m., family member (FM)-A stated the facility was always dirty and had an odor of urine in the hallways. FM-A stated she cleaned R169's room or it would be dirty also. On 7/8/24 at 3:07 p.m., the carpeted floor in the dining room on the unit was observed to have various crumbs and other debris. An approximately 2 x 2 inch piece of paper that was white and yellow was under one square table. Numerous small, light colored, powder-like spots around the whole room. On 7/8/24 at 6:30 p.m., R169 was standing in the hallway in the general area outside her room walking, occasionally touching objects such as the door, handrail, and wall. On 7/9/24 at 1:38 p.m., two light brown spots on the floor approximately 2 inches in diameter close to the wall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for self-administration of medication (SAM) and SAM occurred at the appropriate time for 1 of 1 resident (R173) reviewed for self-administration of medication. Findings include: R173's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R173 had intact cognition and diagnoses of cancer, respiratory failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (long-term lung disease which restricts airflow and causes breathing problems). MDS indicated R173 had no rejection of care and was independent with activities of daily living. R173 required tracheostomy care and suctioning. R173's physician's orders dated 7/11/24, identified Belbuca buccal (applied in the inner cheek) film 300 micrograms (mcg) with directions to place and dissolve 1 film buccally two times a day for pain. R173's physician's orders lacked orders for self-administration of medication. R173's SAM assessment dated [DATE], identified R173 knew their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to provide smoking opportunities for 1 of 1 residents (R581) reviewed for choices. Findings Include: R581's admission Record printed 7/11/24, included diagnosis of weakness and dementia without behavioral disturbance. R581's Nursing admission Evaluation dated 6/20/24, included a section for tobacco use with a selected answer of yes for flame lite tobacco use. Smoking evaluation dated 7/1/24, included R581 wished to smoke during her stay at the facility. Resident wished to ulitized flame lit cigarettes. Resident was marked safe to smoke with limitations. R581's progress note dated 7/1/24, included the resident was observed smoking cigarettes in the hallway of the facility. Progress note dated 7/2/24, included the resident was able to express ideas and wants. Progress note dated 7/2/24, included the resident spent a lot of time looking for cigarettes and propelling self around until asking for cigarettes. Progress note dated 7/9/24, included the resident was asking to go out to smoke several times during the shift. R581's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care (OOLTC) of facility-initiated transfers for 2 of 2 residents (R45, R143) who had been hospitalized . Findings include: R45's nurse's note dated 6/25/24, indicated R45 had been sent to the emergency room due to confusion and was admitted with possible sepsis. The physician's progress noted dated 7/3/24, indicated R45 was hospitalized with sepsis from 6/24/24 -7/1/24. The medical record lacked evidence notice of the transfer was provided to the OOLTC. R143's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], indicated R143 was hospitalized with sepsis from 6/17/24-6/26/24. The medical record lacked evidence of written notification of transfer were provided to the OOLTC. The June 2024 Ombudsman Report dated 7/1/24, identified 4 residents who had been transferred to the hospital in June 2024 . However, the report did not include R45 or R143. During interview on 7/11/24 at 11:41 a.m., the director of nursing (DON)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide notification to the resident and/or resident representative of the facility bed hold policy within 24 hours of an emergency transfer for 1 of 2 residents (R45) who required an emergency transfer to the hospital. Findings include: R45's nurse's note dated 6/25/24, indicated R45 had been sent to the emergency room due to confusion and was admitted with possible sepsis. The physician's progress noted dated 7/3/24, indicated R45 was hospitalized with sepsis from 6/24/24 -7/1/24. During interview on 7/8/24 at 03:21 p.m., R45 stated they had been recently hospitalized with sepsis but could not recall being notified of the facility bed hold policy. During interview on 7/10/24 at 09:08 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-H stated the nurse transferring a resident out of the facility was to notify the resident or their representative of the bed hold policy at time of transfer. RN-H confirmed R45's record lacked a bed hold notification for the 6/24/24, hospitalization. During interview on 7/11/24 at 11:41 a.m., the director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to revise and update a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 2 residents (R45) reviewed for hospitalizations, and 1 or 3 residents (R45) reviewed for dialysis for services provided per plan of care. Findings include: R45's undated face sheet indicate R45 was admitted to the facility 2/28/24 with diagnoses including anemia (not having enough healthy red blood cells), heart failure (progressive heart disease that affects the pumping action of the heart), high blood pressure, and end stage renal failure (ESRD-advanced stage of chronic kidney disease when the kidneys can no longer filter wastes and fluids from the blood). R45's physician progress noted dated 7/3/24, indicated R45 was hospitalized with sepsis from 6/24/24 -7/1/24. R45's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] indicated R45 was hospitalized with bacteremia due to infected PCAD (a device used for dialysis) and subsequently had this device surgically removed on 6/25/24. R45's care plan included a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation , interview and document review, the facility failed to provide bathing for 1 of 1 residents (R166) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Findings include: R166's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R166 was cognitively intact with diagnoses including depression, anxiety, end stage renal disease (ESRD), and unsteady gait. R166 was also identified as requiring partial assistance (staff does less than half of the effort) with bed mobility, transfers, and personal hygiene. R1 was totally dependent on staff for toileting. The MDS did not identify R166's ability to complete full baths or showers and indicated R166 did not display behaviors including refusal of cares. R166's care plan dated 4/10/24, directed the two staff members to assist with personal hygiene. The plan directed extensive assistance with bathing. During interview on 7/8/24, at 6:23 p.m. R166 stated they had not had a shower since arriving at the facility. R166 stated the therapy staff had tried to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents received timely follow-up treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and provider's recommendations for 1 of 1 residents (R121) reviewed for appointments. The facility also failed to follow provider orders and administer a blood pressure medication only when outside certain parameters for 1 of 1 residents (R40) reviewed for quality of care. Additionally the facility failed to monitor vital signs as ordered for 2 of 3 residents (R73, R138) reviewed for nutrition and recognize nursing staff were documenting colostomy care as being provided to a resident that did not have a colostomy for 1 of 1 resident (R190). R40's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R57 was severely cognitively impaired. Diagnoses included hypertension and end stage renal disease, R40's provider orders dated 5/9/24 indicated R40 was started on Midodrine (a medication to increase the blood pressure when low), 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide timely assistance in repositioning and toileting for 1 of 1 resident (R138) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: R138's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] included diagnoses of dementia, hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body), and malnutrition. R138 was dependent for toileting hygiene and dependent for chair to bed transfer. R138's MDS indicated she had moderate cognitive impairment. R138's care plan dated 5/2/24, identified R138 was incontinent of bladder and required assistance every 2-3 hours for incontinent care to remain free from skin breakdown. R138 had the potential for pressure ulcer development. During continuous observation on 7/10/24 from 7:35 a.m. to 11:16 a.m., R138 was observed in her wheelchair in the dining room. At 7:35 a.m., R138 was observed at the dining room table waiting for breakfast. At 9:54 a.m., R138 attended an activity in the dining room. At 11:08 a.m., resident remained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a post hospitalization assessment was completed for 1 of 1 residents (R45) who had their arteriovenous (AV) access site and hemodialysis treatment discontinued and also failed to ensure post-dialysis monitoring assessments were consistently completed and accurately documented to provide continuity of care and reduce the risk of complications for 3 of 3 residents (R45, R166 and R143) reviewed for dialysis care and services. Findings include: R45: R45's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R45 was cognitively intact, and demonstrated no rejection of care behavior. The MDS indicated R45 was diagnosed with chronic kidney disease with dialysis. R45's order summary report dated 7/9/24, included the following current orders: -Hemodialysis (3) times per week on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Venous access site: care and dressing change during dialysis days and as needed (per dialysis). The order start date was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement dementia care as part of the comprehensive care plan for 1 of 3 residents (R184) reviewed for dementia care. Finding include: R 184's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], quarterly indicated R184 had moderate cognitive impairment with the diagnoses of chronic obstructive disease, major depressive disorder recurrent, and dementia. R184's care plan listed as last reviewed on 4/17/24, lacked evidence of individualized interventions to support R184's dementia diagnosis. In addition, the care plan lacked evidence of interventions for mental health needs and management. During an interview on 7/11/24 at 1046 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-A confirmed R184 had a diagnosis of dementia. After review of the electronic medical record (EMR) and the paper chart, RN-A confirmed R184's care plan did not include interventions for dementia care or mental health needs. During an interview on 7/11/24 at 2:10 p.m., the director of nursing (DON)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify individualized approaches for care, including non-pharmacological interventions to aid in the management of mood and behavior, for 2 of 5 residents (R67, R184) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R67: R67's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], included R67 was cognitively intact, had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and depression, and took antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. The MDS indicated R67 did not exhibit any behaviors. R67's provider History and Physical dated [DATE], included R67 had severe major depressive disorder with psychotic features. R67's care plan dated [DATE], included R67 used psychotropic medications for behavior management and depression, and R67 had a behavior problem relating to sitting in a chair with a blanket over their head. The care plan lacked resident-specific interventions to address R67's mood and behaviors. R67's Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (R6, R45, R202) were offered or received pneumococcal vaccination in accordance to Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations. Findings include: Review of the current CDC pneumococcal vaccine guidelines located at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/pneumo/hcp/pneumo-vaccine-timing.html, identified for: 1) Adults 19-[AGE] years old with specified immunocompromising conditions, staff were to offer and/or provide: a) the PCV-20 at least 1 year after prior PCV-13, b) the PPSV-23 (dose 1) at least 8 weeks after prior PCV-13 and PPSV-23 (dose 2) at least 5 years after first dose of PPSV-23. Staff were to review the pneumococcal vaccine recommendations again when the resident turns [AGE] years old. 2) Adults [AGE] years of age or older, staff were to offer and/or provide based off previous vaccination status as shown below: a) If NO history of vaccination, offer and/or provide: aa) the PCV-20 OR bb) PCV-15 followed by PPSV-23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and document review, the facility failed to review a progress note from a physician's appointment for 1 of 4 residents (R1). The progress note identified suicidal ideation and physical abuse allegations, putting R1 at risk for harm from self or others. Findings include: R1's face sheet dated 6/7/24, indicated R1 had diagnoses of adult failure to thrive, cirrhosis of liver, neoplasm of breast, depression, unspecified symptoms and signs involving cognitive function, cognitive communication deficit and dementia. R1's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified R1 was significantly cognitively impaired and required assist of 1 to 2 staff for activities of daily living. R1's patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) dated 6/3/24 indicated R1 had little interest or pleasure in doing things, was feeling down, depressed, or hopeless, was feeling tired and had thoughts that she would be better off dead or hurting herself in some way over the past two weeks. R1's care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain a complete, accurately documented, and readily accessible medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 1 resident (R5). Findings include: R5's facesheet dated 5/15/24, indicated R5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal (kidney) disease (ESRD, when a person's kidneys stop functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life), type 2 diabetes with diabetic chronic kidney disease, mild protein-calorie malnutrition, and dependence on renal dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the body when the kidneys stop working properly). R5's provider orders included an order dated 4/15/24, for weight once daily in the morning, call physician if weight increased by two pounds in 24 hours or five pounds in seven days from admission weight. R5's electronic health record (EHR) included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to initiate oxygen orders for 3 of 5 residents (R2, R3, R4) and bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP, delivers pressurized air to the lungs) orders for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 was cognitively intact. R2's Diagnosis List printed 11/30/23, included multiple sclerosis and hypoxemia. R2's Provider Orders dated 06/05/23, indicated an order for oxygen: 2 liters of supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula to keep oxygen saturations at or above 90%. R2's care plan lacked a plan for oxygen use. R2's electronic medical record (EMR) lacked progress notes for the 11/30/23, day shift to assess oxygen use. On 11/30/23 at 10:33 a.m., R2 was observed in her room with 3 liters of supplemental oxygen delivered by nasal cannula, although the order indicated 2 liters. On 11/30/23 at 11:13 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A verified R2's oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow professional standards following the correct procedure as ordered for 1 of 1 resident (R3) who received lymphedema wraps (multilayer wraps to add compression to excess fluid to assist in circulation). R3 had multiple orders with different procedures for his lymphedma wraps that staff provide treatment of. Findings include: R3's signed physician order dated 7/17/23 indicated 1. Occupational Therapy (OT) to evaluate and treat for lymphedema wraps. 2. Later left lower extremity (LLE) wound care: Clean lower extremity with wound cleanser, pat dry, cover open area with absorbent dressing. Complete wound care with lymphedema wrap changes. R3's signed physician order dated 7/19/23 indicated OT to evaluate because worsening of lower extremity lymphedema. Wrap legs with ace bandage, elevate. R3's signed physician orders dated 8/23/23 indicated 1. Discontinue previous lower tibia wound care orders. 2. Wound care: Left lower extremity clean…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to disinfect reusable medical equipment consistent with accepted standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (R3) and (R4) observed following personal cares. The facility had 52 positive COVID-19 cases. Findings include: A Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) website dated 10/22/23 https://www.health.state.mn.us/facilities/patientsafety/infectioncontrol/pre/standard.html indicated standard precautions are the basic level of infection control that should be used in the care of all patients all the time. Patient care equipment identified equipment is to be cleaned, disinfected, or reprocess non-disposable equipment before reuse with another patient. R3's care plan dated 7/1/23, indicated R3 transferred with an EZ-stand (a transfer-assist machine which actively engages the patient in the standing process.) R3's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R3 had a Brief Inventory of Mental Status (BIMs) score of 10 indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for 1 of 2 residents (R105) reviewed who were dependent on staff for personal cares. Findings include: R105's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R105 required extensive assistance with bathing and personal hygiene. R105's cognition was intact. R105's care plan dated 10/13/21 indicated assistance of one person for personal hygiene. R105's admission record printed 9/27/23 included diagnoses of diabetes mellitus and need for assistance with personal care. R105's Task on treatment administration record (TAR) dated September 2023 read to ensure weekly bath and skin assessment were completed every Thursday. Task was marked as complete 9/7/23, 9/14/23 and 9/21/23. On 9/25/23 at 1:38 p.m., R105 stated she wanted her toenails trimmed. Toenails on right foot were approximately 1/8 inch past end of toes, clean and not thick. On 9/27/23 at 11:32 a.m., NA-C stated the licensed nurse would complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 (R1 & R3) residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans had developed and implemented person-centered care plans. Findings include: R1's care plan initiated on 5/1/23, noted R1 required total assistance of a mechanical lift for transfers, suicidal ideation on 8/4/23, and that R1 was at risk for falls with a fall risk score of 10 or greater due to gait and balance problems initiated on 8/31/23. The associated goals and interventions were not personalized for either suicidal ideation or fall risk and contained place holders such as specify, I need, the resident needs, [PREFERRED NAME] needs a safe environment with: (specify: even floors free from spills and/or clutter, adequate, glare-free light; a working and reachable call light .). An intervention for his suicidal ideation noted ACP (Associated Clinic of Psychology) consult. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], noted R1 had intact cognition, required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care for 1 of 3 residents (R2) who were totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Finding include: R3's admission Record dated 5/22/23 indicated R3' diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, cervical myelopathy, right femoral head fracture and dislocation. R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R3 was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, required total assistance with ADLs, and had moderate cognitive impairment. R3's care plan dated 5/22/23 indicated R3 was totally dependent on staff, and staff was to check R3 every two hours and assist with toileting as needed. On 8/16/23, at 12:35 p.m., R3 was observed in bed uncovered, with the head of the bed elevated. R3's incontinence brief was moderately soaked with urine. R3's bed sheet and his gown were both soaked with urine. No staff was noted in the room at this time. On 8/16/23, at 12:45 p.m. R3's family member (FM)-A stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer/provide oral cares, shaving, and brushing of hair for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) and who was dependent on staff for cares. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had moderately impaired cognition, required extensive assistance with personal hygiene, and displayed no rejection of care behaviors. R1's care plan dated 7/26/23, indicated R1 needed assistance with washing, dressing, and grooming and to encourage R1 to participate as able. During observation and interview on 7/31/23 at 10:48 a.m., R1 was in bed wearing a gown. Family member (FM) was visiting and stated they were not sure if staff had cleaned R1 up yet today. During observation on 7/31/23 at 2:13 p.m., NA (nursing assistant)-A and NA-B assisted R1 with cares by turning and repositioning R1 while R1 was in bed. NA-A provided R1 with a washcloth, and R1 used the washcloth to wash face. NA-A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to routinely provide and document range of motion (ROM) exercises to maintain and prevent decline in current physical functioning for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for restorative therapies. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had moderately impaired cognition and diagnoses of multiple sclerosis and a seizure disorder. R1 needed extensive to total assistance with most activities of daily living (ADL's). R1 had impairments to both sides of upper and lower extremities and no rejection of cares. There were zero days in which restorative nursing programs were provided during the seven-calendar day look-back. R1's care plan dated 7/26/23, directed staff to provide gentle range of motion as tolerated with daily care. R1's physician orders dated 2/9/23, indicated for physical, occupational, and speech therapy to eval and treat for strengthening and weakness. R1's physical therapy Discharge summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure a suprapubic catheter tubing and prevent skin complications for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for catheter care. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], included diagnoses of neurogenic bladder and multiple sclerosis. R1 had moderately impaired cognition and needed extensive to total assistance with most activities of daily living (ADL's). The MDS indicated R1 had an indwelling catheter. R1's face sheet dated 8/2/23, included diagnosis of retention of urine. The Care Area Assessment (CAA) with unknown date, indicated the care plan would address minimizing risks associated with the use of an indwelling catheter. R1's physician order dated 2/9/23, indicated staff monitor and assess for signs and symptoms of catheter related complications including penile erosion two times a day. If complications noted, staff to update the MD/NP for additional interventions. R1's care plan dated 7/26/23, indicated suprapubic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2026-06-25 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the staff posting was updated each shift as required, resulting in outdated staffing information being consistently posted over multiple days. This had the ability to affect all 241 residents residing in the care facility. Findings include:From 6/22/26 through 6/25/26, the facility's nurse staffing post was observed to be outdated on multiple occasions. On 6/22/26 at 10:02 a.m., the posted nurse staffing information was dated Friday, 6/19/26. On 6/24/26 at 7:53 a.m., the posted nurse staffing information was dated 6/23/26. On 6/25/26 at 7:50 a.m., the posted nurse staffing information was dated 6/24/26. The posted nurse staffing information had not been updated daily or per shift as required.During an interview on 6/25/26 at 7:46 a.m., front desk staff (O)-1 stated staffing updates were typically maintained by the staffing office.During an interview on 6/25/26 at 7:50am, the staffing coordinator (SC) stated the scheduling staff were responsible for updating the posting on weekdays, and on weekends the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-03-07 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the actual working hours for nursing staff was recorded on the daily staffing sheet posted each day. This had the potential to impact any residents, family or staff who may have wanted to view the actual working hours. Findings include: During observations on 3/4, 3/5, and 3/6/25 the facility posted daily staffing reports including the staff positions, number of staff, facility census, and scheduled hours. The posted staffing didn't include the actual working hours of staff scheduled that day. A review of the facility's posted staffing from 2/20/25 to 3/3/25 revealed no actual working hours for nursing staff. During an interview on 3/6/25 at 2:58 p.m., the lead staffing person (LSP) stated she was responsible for posting the daily staffing, but was not aware the actual hours needed to be posted on the staffing sheet. The LSP added that the actual schedule had those hours on it, but this information was not pulled to the daily staffing posting and hadn't been for about a year since they got a new staffing program.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$25,480 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $25,480 — penalty dated 2025-03-07
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-29 for 7 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES — 30 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
The other 29 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NORTH RIDGE OPERATOR LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/01/2014 |
| BARRES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2014 |
| T AND C CAPITAL ASSETS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2014 |
| WINDWARD HEALTH PARTNERS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2014 |
| CRINO, BRYAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2014 |
| FEUER, SCOTT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2014 |
| LINDEMAN, STUART | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2014 |
| PASSERO, JOSEPH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2014 |
| MCCRAY, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/02/2024 |
| RASQUINHA, CLEMENCIA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/02/2024 |
| YOAKUM, JAMIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/20/2024 |
| MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2014 |
| MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2014 |
| BARNES, MICHELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245183. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.