Hutchinson Operator, LLC
2301 N Severance Street, Hutchinson, KS 67502 · For profit - Corporation · 45 certified beds · (620) 662-0597 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $15,918 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-18)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.2% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.4% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 4.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.9% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.8% | 6.5% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.0% | 4.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 40.2% | 16.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.8% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.6% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.2% | 4.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.6% | 22.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.0% | 18.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 35.0% | 73.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.7% | 22.4% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.7% | 11.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.96 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.48 | 2.13 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 37.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.7%CMS range 38.5–64.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 6.9–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 37.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 25.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 88.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.4%CMS range 4.8–16.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.25 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 41.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.554 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 39 residents with five selected for review. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure competent nursing staff implemented interventions for choking Resident (R)1. On 07/02/23, R1 sat at the table during supper and exhibited signs of choking. The staff alerted the Licensed Nurse that R1 was not breathing right. When the Licensed Nurse responded, R1 was grayish in color with blue lips, her oxygen saturation level was 36%, and she was breathing rapidly. The Licensed Nurse increased R1's oxygen from three to five liters and called 911. The Licensed Nurse failed to implement any interventions to address R1's choking. While in the EMS (Emergency Medical Service) transport vehicle, EMS staff discovered the presence of food in R1's airway and removed multiple pieces. R1 went into respiratory arrest and during compressions, a small amount of meat passed from the side of her vocal cords, and more meat came forth from her esophagus. R1 admitted to the hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-02 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 39 residents with five residents selected for review for dietary services. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)1, who had a history of aspiration (when food, liquid, or other material enters a person's airway and eventually the lungs by accident) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), her physician ordered mechanical soft diet with ground meat on 07/02/23. On 07/02/23 R1 displayed symptoms of choking and required Emergency Medical Services (EMS) transport for treatment. EMS discovered the presence of food in R1's airway and R1 went into respiratory distress while in the transport vehicle, and a small amount of meat passed from the side of her vocal cords and more meat came forth from her esophagus during compressions. EMS transported R1 to the hospital where she admitted on [DATE] and expired on 07/12/23 following removal of ventilation per family request. Failure of the facility to provide the physician ordered ground meat diet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 41 residents. The sample included six residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free of accident hazards when on 10/07/25 at approximately 12:15 PM, staff pushed R1 down the hallway in the shower chair. R1's right lower leg became entangled in the shower chair causing R1 to fall out of the chair, resulting in a right tibia (the large bone in the lower leg) and right fibula (the small bone in the lower leg) fractures. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) included diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2 - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), morbid obesity (excessive body fat), abnormal involuntary movements and generalized muscle weakness.R1's 09/19/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The assessment documented R1 utilized a wheelchair for locomotion and required the use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-07-01 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 42 residents with three residents reviewed for code status. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to Resident (R) 1, who desired resuscitative measures indicated by her full code status. At 05:20 PM on [DATE] Licensed Nurse (LN) G left R1's room to obtain a breathing treatment for R1. Before she could return to the room, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R told LN G that R1's spouse reported R1 was unresponsive. LN G assessed R1 and noted a weak apical pulse. LN G asked R1's spouse if he wanted staff to start CPR and R1's non-DPOA spouse nodded and confirmed that was what R1 wanted. R1's spouse then recanted and told staff not to start compressions. At 05:29 PM R1 had no heartbeat but staff did not initiate resuscitative measures despite her full code status. This deficient practice placed R1 and all 22 residents with full code status in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - R1's Electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 42 residents. The facility identified five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) employed for more than 12 months. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review at least once every 12 months for four of the five CNAs reviewed. Findings included: - Review of CNA personnel files revealed the following: CNA P, hired on 12/31/24, lacked an annual performance evaluation. CNA Q, hired on 09/04/24, lacked an annual performance evaluation. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S, hired 07/07/22, lacked an annual performance evaluation. CNA T, hired on 11/21/24, lacked an annual performance evaluation. During an interview on 01/29/26 at 01:52 PM, Administrative Nurse D reported she expected 100 percent compliance in having the annual performances evaluations completed annually. The facility policy Inservice Training Program, Nurse Aide, dated 11/2025, documented the facility would complete an annual evaluation on each nurse aide and utilize such information to validate or change required in-service education.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily staff posting included the actual hours worked by the nursing staff as required. Findings included:- During an observation on 01/29/26 at 11:50 AM, the daily staff posting document lacked documentation of actual hours worked. Review of the daily staff posting documents from 01/26/26 to 01/29/26 revealed a lack of documentation of actual hours worked. During an interview on 01/29/26 at 11:52 AM, Administrative Staff B stated she had never been educated to post the actual hours worked for the posted staff sheet. During an interview on 01/29/26 at 01:36 PM, Administrative Staff C reported she expected the actual hours to be posted on the staff sheet. The facility did not provide a policy of posted nursing staff.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate infection control practices related to Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) and Transmission Based Precautions (TBP-infection control procedures to limit the transmission of infectious agents), sanitization of shared equipment and hand hygiene. Findings included:- On 01/27/2026 at 08:54 AM, Resident (R)38 had signage posted on the door at the entrance to his room which directed staff to use gloves, mask, and gowns prior to entering his room due to Droplet Precautions. A three-drawer rubberized container with personal protective equipment (PPE- gowns, face shields and/or eyeglasses/goggles, and gloves) was set-up outside of R38's door. On 01/27/2026 at 08:57 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Y delivered a meal tray to R38's room. She entered the room with a mask on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 42 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) possessed the required certification. Findings included: - Upon request, the facility was unable to provide proof of certification for the designated IP. On 01/28/2026 at 05:30 PM, Administrative Nurse E stated she was the designated IP. She stated she had not completed the certification course in infection control prior to her appointment to the position about a month ago. Administrative Nurse E stated she was about halfway through the course requirements for certification. The facility did not provide a policy related for certification and qualification of the IP.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided ADL assistance with personal hygiene for Resident (R) 4, R21, R7 and R40, who did not receive fingernail care and/or showers. Findings included:1.R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded a diagnosis of bladder dysfunction and inflammatory reaction due to an indwelling urethral (tubelike part of the body conveys urine from the bladder to the exterior) catheter and bipolar disorder (a major mental illness which causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods). R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. R4 had no rejection of cares during the observation period. The MDS noted R4 was dependent on staff for most ADL, including showering and personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 42 residents; the sample included 12 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to acknowledge the Consultant Pharmacist's monthly medication regimen review (MRR) and failed to ensure the MRR recommendations were filed in the clinical record for Resident (R) 1, R3, R6, R20, and R33. Findings included:1. R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded the following Medication Regimen Review (MRR): R1's Pharmacy Consultant Note on 09/25/2025 documented MRR completed, irregularities noted, see report. R1's Pharmacy Consultant Note on 10/24/2025 documented MRR completed, irregularities noted, see report. R1's Pharmacy Consultant Note on 12/11/2025 documented MRR completed, irregularities noted, see report. R1's clinical record lacked the actual recommendations made and lacked evidence that the facility and physician acknowledged and responded. 2. R3's EMR recorded the following MRR: R3's Pharmacy Consultant Note on 10/25/25 documented MRR completed, irregularities noted,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 42 residents, two medication rooms and four medications carts. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) appropriately to include an opened date on insulin pens in use. Findings included:- Observation on 01/28/26 at 08:29 AM revealed the following insulin pens were open, and undated. 1. Resident (R) 2's Lantus (long-acting insulin) had no label or open date. Her insulin lispro (fast-acting insulin) had no legible open date. 2. R15's insulin lispro had no open date. 3. R4's Lantus has no open date. 4. R17's glargine (long-acting insulin) had no cap and no open date. According to medlineplus.gov, open Lantus, glargine, and insulin lispro pens must be stored at room temperature and may be used for up to 28 days after the first use. During an interview on 01/28/26 at 08:29, AM Licensed Nurse (LN) J reported that the insulin pens should b e labeled when opened. During an interview on 01/29/26 at 08:55 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated she expected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 42 residents; the sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform Resident (R) 3 and R20 and/or their representatives regarding the risks related to psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medications. Findings included:1. R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented an order for olanzapine (antipsychotic medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) five milligrams (mg) by mouth once daily, dated 06/25/25. R3's EMR lacked evidence R3, or her representative, received education and/or informed consent with regards to the olanzapine dose and frequency increase. 2. R20's EMR documented an order for trazodone (antidepressant) 50 mg by mouth every 24 hours at bedtime as needed for insomnia (inability to sleep), dated 10/10/25. The order lacked a stop date. The EMR noted an order for citalopram hydrobromide (antidepressant medication) 40 mg daily by mouth, dated 10/10/25. R20's EMR lacked evidence R20, or his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 42. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for beneficiary notifications. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to use the appropriate Advance Beneficiary Notice of Notice of Non-coverage (ABN) Form CMS-10055 and failed to ensure section G recorded the resident's selection for Resident (R) 4 and R6 and failed to issue the ABN to R35. The facility failed to issue the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage for R35. Findings included:1. R4's facility provided documentation noted her Medicare Part A last covered day was 11/20/25. The resident remained in the facility. R4's ABN Form CMS-R-131, dated 11/20/25, lacked section G selection. 2. R6's facility provided documentation noted his Medicare Part A last covered day was 07/23/25. The resident remained in the facility. R6's ABN Form CMS-R-131, dated 11/20/25, lacked section G selection. 3. R35's facility provided documentation revealed his Medicare Part A services ended 12/24/25. The resident remained in the facility. Upon request, the facility was unable to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, homelike environment for Resident 33, R7, and R40. Findings included:- An observation on 01/27/2026 at 08:59 AM revealed R33's room had a strong foul odor, and his linen on his bed was dirty and gray in color. An observation on 01/27/2026 at 01:20 PM revealed R40's recliner had vinyl peeling off the chair. He said the recliner was broken and he thought he had reported it. An observation on 01/28/2026 at 07:33 AM revealed R7 laid in bed watching TV. The room had a strong urine odor. An observation on 01/28/2026 at 08:06 AM revealed Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R opened the door to R33's room, and strong foul odor was evident from the room all the way out in the hallway. His sheets remained the same dirty sheets as the previous day. An observation on 01/28/2026 at 10:47 AM revealed R40 had a pile of food crumbs and dirt in front of his chair, and red dried smears on his tray table. The tray table had duct…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 6 and R20's as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication (alters mood or thoughts) had a 14 day stop date, or a specified duration with a physician rationale for extended use. The facility failed to ensure R6's PRN antipsychotic (a psychotropic medication used to treat severe mental disorders) had the required 14 day stop date. Findings included:1. R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) listed a Physician's Order for haloperidol (an antipsychotic medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg) tablet, give one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for agitation/aggression, dated 10/18/25. The order lacked a stop date. R6's EMR documented an order lorazepam (antianxiety a class of medications that calm and relax people) 0.5 mg tablet, give one tablet by mouth every two hours as needed for anxiety/seizure, dated 11/04/25. The order lacked a stop date. An observation on 01/28/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for discharge and three for hospitalization. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a written bed hold policy including duration for Resident (R)21, and R20. The facility also failed to notify the Office of the Long-term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) of a transfer for R46.Findings included:1.R21's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. R21's Nursing Progress Note, dated 01/02/26 at 06:36 AM, which documented R21 was admitted to the hospital with urosepsis (sepsis related to UTI) and a verbal bed hold was given before departure. R21's EMR lacked evidence a written bed hold notice was provided to R21. During an interview on 01/27/26 at 09:11 AM, R21 reported she did not know anything about a bed hold. 2. R20's Quarterly MDS, dated 12/30/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident (R) 20's psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medications, and R7's activities of daily living (ADLs) for a dependent resident. Findings included:1. R20's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness) and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). R20's 09/29/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated intact cognition. R20's MDS documented no behaviors and minimal depression. R20's MDS recorded he received an antianxiety, (a class of medications which calm and relax people), an antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions which cause a break from reality), and an antidepressant (a class of medications used to treat mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three residents reviewed for urinary catheters (a tube inserted directly into the bladder to drain urine). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate catheter related care for Resident (R) 4, R7 and R21 when staff did not ensure each resident's catheter tubing was secured to prevent pulling or dislodgement. The facility additionally failed to ensure each resident was provided with a dignity bag to cover the urine collection bag and failed to ensure the urine collection bags remained sanitary and off the floor. Findings included:1.R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded a diagnosis of bladder dysfunction and inflammatory reaction due to an indwelling urethral (tubelike part of the body conveys urine from the bladder to the exterior) catheter.R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for immunizations. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide education and obtain consent or informed declination for the pneumococcal (type of bacterial infection) vaccine for Resident (R) 1, R20 and R25. Findings included:- Review of R1's Immunization Record lacked documentation of education provided by the facility, regarding the risk verses benefits of pneumococcal vaccine administered on 10/11/22, since his entry on 08/29/19. Review of R20's Immunization Record lacked documentation of education provided by the facility regarding the risk verses benefits and/or the offer of pneumococcal vaccine since his entry on 09/25/25. Additionally, the documentation lacked indication of historical data of the resident's pneumovax status. Review of R25's Immunization Record lacked documentation of education provided by the facility, regarding the risk verses benefits and/or the offer of pneumococcal vaccine, since his entry on 04/06/23. Additionally, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the services of a full-time certified dietary manager for the 42 residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 04/09/24 at 08:30 AM, observation revealed dietary staff in the kitchen prepared the breakfast meal. On 04/09/24 at 08:40 AM, Dietary Staff BB verified she was not a certified dietary manager. Dietary Staff BB stated the facility had three residents with mechanical soft diets and one with a pureed diet who is in the hospital. On 04/11/24 at 02:00 PM, Administrative Staff A verified Dietary Staff BB was not certified. The facility's Food Service Staffing dated 10/2024, documented the community will employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills to carry out the function of the food and nutrition services. The qualified Dietician would help oversee clinical nutrition and dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 42 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner and failed to adequately sanitize dishes for the 42 residents that resided in the facility and received meals from the kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings Included: - On 04/09/24 at 08:30 AM, observation during the initial kitchen tour revealed the upright refrigerator-freezer contained the following items in the bottom freezer drawer: One bag of approximately 50 pepperoni circles with an open date of 09/15/23 and an expiration date of 03/15/24. One bag of eight Salisbury steak patties with an open date of 03/18/24 and an expiration date of 03/25/24. On 04/09/24 at 09:00 AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff (DS) DD operated the dishwasher and the wash temperature was at 105 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the rinse temperature was at 110 degrees F. DS DD ran five loads and the temperature remained at 105 - 110 degrees F. The Dishwasher Temperature Logs, dated April 2024, documented morning,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with four reviewed for falls. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards when the accessible hot water at the dining room sink was 131 degrees F (Fahrenheit) and further failed to provide effective interventions to prevent further falls for Resident (R) 13. This placed the residents at risk for injuries related to hot water hazards and falls. Findings included: - On 04/09/24 at 11:37 AM, observation revealed the facility's dining room sink had a hot water temperature of 130 degrees F. On 04/09/24 at 11:40 AM, Maintenance Staff U obtained a water temperature of 131.6 degrees F. He stated he had just turned up the hot water thermostat that morning after finding the dishwasher temperature was not high enough at 115 degrees F. He stated both the dining room sink and the kitchen were on the same water line. At that time, he turned off the hot water valve under the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to discard Resident (R)1, R32, and R144s' insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) flex pens when outdated and failed to discard expired stock medications. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for ineffective medications. Findings included: - On 04/09/24 at 09:10 AM, observation of the facility's South Hall treatment cart revealed the following: R1's Lantus (long-acting insulin) flex pen was labeled with an open date of 03/09/24 (expired on 04/05/24, 28 days). R32 basaglar (Lantus) flex pen was opened on 03/09/24 (expired on 04/05/24, 28 days). R144's insulin glargine (Lantus) flex pen was opened on 02/02/24 (expired on 3/01/24, 28 days). On 04/09/24 at 09:15 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) I verified the nurses were supposed to date the flex pens when opened and discard the outdated insulin. On 04/11/24 at 09:30 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the nurses should label and date the flex pens…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for immunizations. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Residents (R) 11, R13, R19, R25, and R143 with the most recent Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccination information statement (VIS) before administering vaccinations. This placed the residents at risk for uninformed decisions related to vaccinations. Findings included: - Five residents ' records reviewed for immunizations revealed the facility ' s vaccination consent forms lacked the most recent Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccination information. The facility used a consent form with information from the 08/15/19 influenza, the 10/30/19 PCV13, and the 10/30/19 PPSV23 CDC guidelines. The five residents were not provided the most recent CDC VIS at the time of their vaccinations. On 04/11/24 at 11:22 AM, Administrative Nurse E verified the residents had not been provided the most recent VIS before vaccinations. The facility ' s Vaccination of Residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for pressure ulcers (PU-localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent a pressure injury for Resident (R) 22 who had recurring blisters to the left heel and was at risk for skin breakdown. This placed the resident at risk for pressure injury and delayed healing. Findings included: - R22's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of protein-calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, neuropathy (sharp, shocking nerve pain), chronic pancreatitis (progressive inflammatory disorder), and a Stage 2 pressure ulcer (partial-thickness skin loss into but no deeper than the dermis including intact or ruptured blisters) of the left heel. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for mood and behavior. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for Resident (R)21. This placed her at risk for impaired quality of life due to untreated and ongoing mental health concerns. Findings included: - R21's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) disorder. R21's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 42 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for hospice (a type of health care that focuses on the terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms and attending to their emotional and spiritual needs at the end of life) services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care, which coordinated care and services provided by the facility with the care and services provided by hospice, was developed and available for Resident (R)141. This placed R141 at risk for inappropriate end-of-life care. Findings included: - R141's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of malignant (the tendency of a medical condition, especially tumors, to become progressively worse, most familiar as a characteristic of cancer) neoplasm of the lung or bronchi (the passage that connects your windpipe to your lungs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 39 residents with five residents reviewed including three reviewed for respiratory services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)2's oxygen was set at the appropriate physician ordered setting. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis tab included diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), chronic pulmonary edema (accumulation of extravascular fluid in the lung tissues), and acute and chronic respiratory failure. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R2 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition and noted she required oxygen. The Quarterly MDS dated 06/28/23 assessed R2 with a BIMS score of 14, indicating intact cognition and noted she required oxygen. The Care Plan dated 03/15/23 revealed R2 had respiratory failure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide all residents with a safe, functional, and comfortable environment by failure to repair, clean, or maintain several environmental areas to include carpets (which ran down all resident hallways) and baseboards throughout the facility, as well as the walls in two resident rooms. This failure had the ability to affect all residents, staff, and visitors in the facility. The facility further failed to replace a cover over light bulbs, leaving them open above a residents head. Findings Included: - Observation during the initial tour on 08/11/22 at 08:51 AM revealed two resident rooms on the south hall had holes noted in the walls. The carpet from the entry tiled floor on either side, down both north and south halls, lacked transition strips and the carpet was fraying. The baseboards on both north and south halls were peeling back away from the wall, some sticking out and could catch a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 42 residents. The facility had one main kitchen serving one dining room. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to employ a certified dietary manager or a certified dietary food service manager. This failure affected all residents who receive meals at the facility. Findings Included: - Interview on 08/08/22 at 08:59 AM Dietary Manager N revealed she started at the facility in March 2022 and had begun classes for Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) in August 2022, but verified she was not a CDM. On 08/12/22 at 08:21 AM Administrative Nurse B confirmed they should have a CDM and thought they did but had confirmed they did not. On 08/12/22 at 11:56 AM Administrative Staff A confirmed they should employ a CDM. A review of the facility's policy, Food Service Staffing dated November 2021documented the community will employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. The facility failed to employ a CDM, which affected all residents who ate in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 42 residents. The facility had one main kitchen where food was stored and prepared serving one dining room. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly store food in the main kitchen refrigerators and freezers due to the lack of temperature monitoring; failed to store clean dishes in upright positions; and failed to store opened food products per their policy and in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings included: - During the brief initial tour of the kitchen on 08/08/22 at 08:40 AM the following items were discovered: 1. The small freezer located in the kitchen had thick built-up ice on the inside, two baggies of a red substance stuck in the door of the freezer, and one large bag of fries open with no date and not resealed. 2. The refrigerator with a freezer under it in the kitchen had a bag of 17 hamburger patties open with no date and not resealed. 3. The dry storage had one five-pound bag of instant grits open, not resealed, and no date noted, and seven containers of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-08-12 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer the facility effectively by the failure to have resident care supplies in stock for staff to care of the residents, and failed to keep the building in good, sanitary, clean repair. Findings included: - On 08/08/22 at 07:30 AM a tour of the facility revealed the main hall with large dirty stains on the carpet extending down all hallways. No hand sanitization stations noted in any hall. No wipe containers or boxes of gloves seen in resident rooms. On 08/08/22 at 09:49 AM Resident (R) 37 stated they were out of wipes and size three or size four briefs. R37 stated the staff were using size two for her and leaving them unfastened. On 08/08/22 at 02:18 PM R5 stated he had been without a strap for his tubing from his urostomy for some time now. R5 stated he had asked for one, but the staff told him they were back ordered. On 08/09/22 at 11:42 AM R22 reported they don't have any pants here or wipes so I have started buying my own so I will have some. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment by the failure to know wet times of the disinfectant used to clean the facility, lack of access to ABHR in the facility, lack of hand hygiene with cares, catheter tubing on the floor, and dirty/stained carpet observed throughout the facility. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings included: - On 08/08/22 at 07:30 AM a tour of the facility revealed the main hall with large dirty stains on the carpet extending down all hallways. No hand sanitization stations noted in any hall. No wipe containers or boxes of gloves seen in resident rooms. All rooms did have sinks to wash hands. A housekeeper could be seen down a hall as she cleaned rooms. On 08/12/22 at 10:00 AM Housekeeping Staff V reported when she cleaned a contaminated room she gowned, gloved, and wore goggles and she already had a mask in place. She entered the room and wiped all the high touch surfaces using a cleaner called Peroxy Clean.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and comfortable environment by failure to repair, clean, or maintain several environmental areas accessible to all staff and visitors, to include carpets (which ran down all resident hallways) and baseboards throughout the facility. Findings Included: - Observation during the initial tour on 08/11/22 at 08:51 AM revealed the carpet from the entry tiled floor on either side, down both north and south halls, lacked transition strips and the carpet was fraying. The carpet was the walkway to all resident rooms. The baseboards on both north and south halls were peeling back away from the wall, some sticking out and could catch a visitor's pants or ankles causing injury. The carpet, which ran down both hallways had numerous stains, too many to count, and dark spots that almost covered the entirety of the carpet. Surveyors noted some stickiness while walking through the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 42 residents, with 12 sampled, including one for indwelling urinary catheters (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote dignity when staff failed to provide a dignity bag for the indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag for Resident (R) 31. Findings included: - R31's pertinent diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented no appropriate diagnosis for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. The 12/01/21 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. R31 had an indwelling urinary catheter. The 07/03/22 Quarterly MDS documented a BIMS of 13, indicating intact cognition. R31 had an indwelling urinary catheter. The 12/01/21 Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R31 had an indwelling urinary catheter in place and required staff assistance with managing his catheter. The 06/09/22 Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 42 residents with 12 in the sample. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the staff reported all allegations of neglect. On 07/04/22 Transportation Staff Q reported a fall while transporting Resident (R)34 to an appointment and required emergency room evaluation. Licensed Nurse (LN) D made a nurse's note but did not report the fall to administrative staff. Findings included: - R34's signed Physician Orders dated 08/01/22 revealed the following diagnoses: end stage renal failure (a terminal disease because of irreversible damage to vital tissues or organs), anemia in chronic kidney disease (condition without enough healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 42 residents with 12 sampled including one for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide ADL assistance to include bathing services to maintain good grooming for Resident (R) 41, who required limited assistance of two staff with bathing. Findings Included: - The 08/09/22 Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R41 had the following diagnoses: Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness) and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The 07/28/22 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 99, indicating he could not finish the assessment. Per staff R41 had long and short-term memory problems and had moderately impaired cognition. R41 required limited assistance of two staff with bathing. The 07/28/21 ADL Function/Rehabilitation Care Area Assessment (CAA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 42 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe environment free of falls when Transportation Staff Q did not secure all straps on Resident (R)34's three wheeled scooter prior to driving. During transportation to an appointment, R34's three wheeled scooter tipped over, causing R34's head to hit the side of the van hurting her ear and she required hospital assessment in response. This failure placed R34 at risk of serious harm and injury. The facility also failed to ensure a safe enviroment for R18 by the failure to ensure the bed locks worked appropriately to prevent him from falling from the bed. Findings included: - R34's signed Physician Orders dated 08/01/22 revealed the following diagnoses: end stage renal failure (a terminal disease because of irreversible damage to vital tissues or organs), anemia in chronic kidney disease (condition without enough healthy red blood cells to carry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 42 residents with 12 sampled including one for an indwelling urinary catheter. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain a physician's appropriate diagnosis for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter (tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) for Resident (R) 31. Findings included: - Review of (R)31's diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) lacked documentation of an appropriate diagnosis for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. The 12/01/21 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. R31 had an indwelling catheter. The 12/01/21 Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter with contributing factors of incontinence and wounds. The Care Plan dated 06/09/22 revealed staff assisted R31 with catheter care every shift and more often as needed. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented as of 07/20/22 R31…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility census totaled 42 residents, with 12 sampled, including five for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate follow up of the consultant pharmacist recommendations regarding as needed (PRN) Haldol (antipsychotic medication) for Resident (R) 32, and R2's behavior monitoring regarding antidepressant medications. These failures placed the residents at risk for adverse effects related to medication use. Findings Included: - R32's Physician's Orders in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) dated 08/09/22 documented diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought), mood disorder (category of mental health problems, feelings of sadness, helplessness, guilt, wanting to die were more intense and persistent than what may normally be felt from time to time), and hallucinations (sensing things while awake that appear to be real, but the mind created). The 06/22/22 Annual Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
- R32's Physician's Orders in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) dated 08/09/22 documented diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought), mood disorder (category of mental health problems, feelings of sadness, helplessness, guilt, wanting to die were more intense and persistent than what may normally be felt from time to time), and hallucinations (sensing things while awake that appear to be real, but the mind created). The 06/22/22 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated intact cognition. The assessment documented the use of an antipsychotic medication daily for R32. The 05/02/22 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. The assessment documented the use of an antipsychotic medication daily for R32. The Physicians Orders documented an order dated 06/28/21 for Haldol (antipsychotic medication) five milligrams(mg)/milliliter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2026-01-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to ensure a safe and sanitary environment in the facility laundry. Findings included:- On 01/29/2026 at 10:31 AM, an inspection of the laundry with Housekeeping Staff/Maintenance Staff U revealed the following concerns: Three soiled laundry bins with an unsanitary, cracked top on the outer edge rim. The floor of the sorting room had paint missing, resulting in an unsanitary surface throughout the laundry room. The table used for folding clean laundry had two USB cables lying across the table surface where staff processed clean laundry. Four cardboard boxes sat directly on the floor and a tray carrier with chemicals was directly on the floor. Four uncovered pillows were stored under a table leaning in direct contact with the wall. There were four feet of missing baseboard at the junction of the soiled linen sorting room wall and floor. Broken and missing tile at the soiled laundry sorting room door transition tile missing at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$15,918 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-11-18
- $5,560 — penalty dated 2024-07-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES — 30 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
The other 29 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KANSAS OPERATOR LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 02/25/2015 |
| BARRES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/26/2015 |
| T AND C CAPITAL ASSETS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/26/2015 |
| WINDWARD HEALTH PARTNERS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/26/2015 |
| CRINO, BRYAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/26/2015 |
| FEUER, SCOTT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/26/2015 |
| LINDEMAN, STUART | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/26/2015 |
| PASSERO, JOSEPH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/26/2015 |
| BARNES, MICHELLE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/20/2022 |
| YOAKUM, JAMIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/19/2024 |
| MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/26/2015 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $300K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175236. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.