Pratt Health And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 39.2 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 41 residents with three residents sampled for safety related to transportation outside the facility. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff provided a safe environment, free of accident hazards during transportation in the facility van. On 03/11/25 at approximately 09:20 AM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) C failed to ensure Resident (R)1 was safely secured in the facility van before operating the vehicle. CNA C began to drive the van and realized R1 did not have a seatbelt on. CNA C then stopped the vehicle and R1 fell out of the wheelchair onto the floor of the facility van and injured his head, face and left arm. This deficient practice placed R1 in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R1 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2 - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), long-term use of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2022-07-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 43 residents with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff identified and promptly responded to signs of pain expressed by cognitively impaired Resident (R)12, when the resident had two fractured ribs and staff did not offer the resident non-pharmacological pain interventions or as needed (PRN) pain medications. Findings included: - Resident (R)12's signed Physician Orders dated 07/01/22 revealed the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's Disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), schizoaffective disorders (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder ), dementia with behavioral disturbance (major mood disorder),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Resident (R) 8, who had dressing changes to a pressure ulcer daily. The facility also failed to implement a complete water management program for Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium spread through mist, such as air-conditioning units in large buildings. Adults over the age of 50 and people with weak immune systems, or chronic lung diseases). Findings included:-R8's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), generalized anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) disorder, cardiac murmur (abnormal sound), and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). R8's Quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with three reviewed for Medicare Liability Notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 8, R10, and R17, or their representative, a Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC) when skilled services ended.Findings included:-A review of R8's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented that her Medicare Part A episode began on 10/23/25 and ended on 01/09/26. Review of R8's clinical record and facility-provided information lacked evidence that R8 was issued a SNF NOMNC as required. A review of R10's EMR documented that his Medicare Part A episode began on 06/27/25 and ended on 08/21/25. Review of R10's clinical record and facility-provided information that lacked evidence of R10 was issued a SNF NOMNC as required. A review of R17's EMR documented that his Medicare Part A episode began on 05/03/25 and ended on 07/22/25. Review of R17's clinical record and facility-provided information that lacked evidence of R17 was issued a SNF NOMNC as required. On 03/16/26 at 02:28 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 38 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 29 and R40 and their representative were provided with a written notification of transfer, that included a statement of the right to appeal and the state ombudsman information, upon their transfer to the hospital as soon as practicable. The facility failed to ensure R40 had a discharge summary and recapitulation of stay completed upon her discharge from the facility. Findings included:1. R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded a Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], which documented an unplanned discharge to an acute hospital with a return anticipated.R29's Entry MDS dated 07/18/25 documented a re-entry to the facility from an acute hospital.R29's Notice of Transfer form, dated 07/10/25, documented that the form was provided to the resident's representative. The Notice of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 41 residents with 16 residents selected for review, which included one resident reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain Resident (R)28's dignity when in bed with only his brief on, to expose himself to the residents, staff and visitors that would go by his room. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)28's electronic medical record revealed diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought), and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with severely impaired cognitive function. The resident had impairment in functional range of motion on one side of his upper and lower extremities. The resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 41 residents with 16 residents sampled. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan with effective interventions for Resident (R)12 related to lack of wheelchair foot pedals and R 18, related to inability to self-administer medications. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)12's electronic medical record (EMR), revealed a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 12/09/23, documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He used a wheelchair for mobility and required substantial to maximal assistance for mobility 150 feet and partial to moderate assist for mobility of 50 feet while in the wheelchair. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL)Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 12/09/23,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 41 residents with 16 selected for review with one resident reviewed for activities of daily living for dependent residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R)28 received facial hair grooming opportunities. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)28's electronic medical record revealed diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought), and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with severely impaired cognitive function. The resident had impairment in functional range of motion on one side of his upper and lower extremities. The resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. The Cognitive Loss Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 41 residents with 16 residents selected for review which included three residents reviewed for skin issues. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and provide sanitary dressing change for one, Resident (R)18's venous ulcer, of the three residents reviewed for skin issues. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)18's electronic medical record, revealed diagnoses that included chronic embolism (an obstruction in a blood vessel due to a blood clot or other foreign matter that gets stuck while traveling through the blood stream) of the deep veins of the left lower extremity, edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues,) and paranoid (a thought process believed to be heavily influenced by anxiety or fear to the point of irrational thinking) personality. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 41 residents with 16 residents selected for review, that included one resident reviewed for vision. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R)14, received vision care. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)14's electronic medical record revealed diagnoses that included diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) and major depressive disorder. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had adequate vision with corrective lenses. The Cognitive Loss Care Area Assessment, (CAA) dated 06/21/23, assessed the resident had risk factors of social isolation and increased anxiety. The Care Plan, reviewed 04/08/24, instructed staff the resident was at risk for potential alterations in his visual status related to use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 41 residents with 16 residents sampled, including five residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely transport one Resident (R)12 in his wheelchair by failing to have foot pedals in place while propelling him in his wheelchair. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)12's electronic medical record (EMR), revealed a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 12/09/23, documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He used a wheelchair for mobility and required substantial to maximal assistance for mobility 150 feet and partial to moderate assist for mobility of 50 feet while in the wheelchair. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL)Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 12/09/23, documented the resident would experience further ADL decline. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 41 residents with 16 residents selected for review, which included five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three Residents (R)18, R34 and R35, of the five residents were monitored for adverse effects of antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) medications in a timely manner. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)18's electronic medical record, revealed diagnoses that included richronic embolism (an obstruction in a blood vessel due to a blood clot or other foreign matter that gets stuck while traveling through the blood stream) of the deep veins of the left lower extremity, edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues,) and paranoid (a thought process believed to be heavily influenced by anxiety or fear to the point of irrational thinking) personality. The Annual Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,901 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,901 — penalty dated 2025-04-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES — 30 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $267K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS