Pittsburg Care And Rehab
1005 E Centennial Drive, Pittsburg, KS 66762 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 86 certified beds · (620) 231-1120 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.7% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.9% | 4.9% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.7% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.8% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 6.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.8% | 4.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.3% | 16.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 36.4% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.5% | 95.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.1% | 4.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.4% | 22.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 31.5% | 18.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 15.0% | 73.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.72 | 1.80 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.37 | 2.13 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 7.9–17.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 59.5 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2022-09-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 68 residents. The sample of 22 residents included seven residents reviewed for restorative nursing services. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure five of the seven sampled residents received restorative nursing services to increase range of motion, prevent further decrease in range of motion, and/or prevent decrease in mobility. Resident (R)16 received therapy services and then no restorative nursing services and declined in range of motion and walking ability; R112 who received no restorative services after therapy; R34, R30, and R12 for no restorative nursing program when they had range of motion impairments. Findings Included: - Review of the resident's (R)16's, Physician Orders, dated 08/09/22, revealed diagnoses which included, cerebral vascular accident (CVA or stroke, sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiparesis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-09-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 68 residents with 22 selected for review, including two residents reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate parameters of nutritional status for one of the two residents reviewed. The facility failed to ensure Resident (R)20 received her diet as ordered, failed to involve the Registered Dietician with R20's desire to lose weight, failed to appropriately monitor the resident's weight, and failed notify the physician of the significant weight loss. R20 experienced a 10.96 percent weight loss from 03/31/22 to 04/29/22, a 10.6 percent weight loss from 05/23/22 to 06/30/22, and a 23.55 percent weight loss from 03/31/22 to 09/03/22. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis tab located in the electronic medical record (EMR), for Resident (R)20, included diagnoses of a pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-09-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 68 residents with 22 selected for review, which included six residents reviewed for medication use. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 24, remained free from a significant medication error when staff failed to administer antihypertensive medication (a drug used to lower blood pressure) as ordered by the physician on 117 instances between 07/05/22 through 08/21/22. This failure resulted in a hypertensive crisis (a severe increase in blood pressure that can lead to a heart attack, stroke, or other life-threatening health problems), which required hospitalization intervention/treatment. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 24's Physician Order Sheet, dated 07/11/22, revealed diagnoses which included hypertensive heart disease, diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and kidney transplant status. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 60 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a water management program for Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium spread through mist, such as air-conditioning units in large buildings. Adults over the age of 50 and people with weak immune systems, chronic lung disease or heavy tobacco use are most at risk of developing a pneumonia caused by legionella). Findings included:- On 03/11/26 at 10:04 AM, Maintenance Staff V reported the facility utilized a Legionella testing kit, which was conducted on 12/22/25 from the kitchen water. The final report, dated 12/30/25, did not detect Legionella. Maintenance Staff V verified the facility did not have documentation of a map from which the facility's source of incoming water, a flow diagram of the water flow of the facility, or areas of designated dead-end water areas in which the water may stagnate. The facility's Water Management, Legionella Testing policy, dated10/2022, documented approaches to controlling waterborne microorganisms (i.e., water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 60 residents. The sample included 15 residents with one resident reviewed for dignity. Based on interviews, observation, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 9 was treated with respect, dignity, and care during mealtimes.Findings included:- R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods).R9's Significant Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 12/28/25 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99; a staff interview was completed which indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition. R9's Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 01/02/26, documented she had a diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 60 residents. The sample included 15 residents with three reviewed for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Beneficiary Liability notices. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide form CMS-10055, Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN), which included the estimated cost for continued services for skilled services to the resident or their representative for Resident (R) 36 and R44.Findings included:- Review of R36's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the Medicare Part A episode began on 01/08/26 and ended on 02/09/26. The ABN dated 02/09/26 lacked a daily rate for services. R36 remained in the facility for custodial care.Review of R44's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the Medicare Part A episode that began on 08/25/25 and ended on 11/07/25. The ABN dated 11/05/25 lacked a daily rate for services. R44 remained in the facility for custodial care.On 03/11/26 at 08:11 AM, Administrative Nurse E stated she was responsible for issuing the ABN notices to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 60 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to keep the residents protected health information (PHI) private on two medication carts parked in the west hallway and the east hallway.Findings included:- On 03/11/26 at 11:31 AM, an observation revealed a medication cart parked in the east hallway with the laptop computer sitting on top. The computer screen was unlocked, and a resident's PHI was on the screen, visible to all who passed by the medication cart. The information visualized included medications, date of birth , allergy information, and code status. No nursing staff were in view of the medication cart.On 03/11/26 at 12:40 PM, an observation revealed a medication cart parked in the west hallway with the laptop computer sitting on top. The computer screen was unlocked, and a resident's PHI was on the screen, visible to all who passed by the medication cart. The information visualized included medications, date of birth , allergy information, and code status. No nursing staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 60 residents. The sample included 15 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interviews, observation, and record review the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the continued use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) for Resident (R)4 and R19, who had a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion).Findings included:- R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of dementia, depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear).The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 01/04/26 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 60 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with two residents reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to identify a significant change in the physical condition and complete a comprehensive Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident (R) 9 with the admission to hospice services. Findings included:- R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods).R9's Significant Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 12/28/25 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99; a staff interview was completed which indicated the resident had severely impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 60 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate pain management was provided to Resident (R) 41 for ongoing pain in the knees, lower back, and shoulders.Findings included:- R41 Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R41 had diagnoses of cardiomyopathy (heart disease), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing) depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), need assistance with personal care, and muscle weakness.R41's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R41 had intact cognition. The MDS further documented R41 received scheduled pain medication regimen, no as needed medication, and received a nonpharmacological intervention for pain. R41 had pain frequently at a pain level of 10 (pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 60 residents. The sample included 15 residents with two residents reviewed for hospice services. Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure collaboration with the hospice provider for Resident (R) 19 and R9.Findings included:- R19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear).R19's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 01/31/26 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of three which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R19 received hospice services during the observation period. R19's Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 05/07/25, documented she had a diagnosis of dementia and had received an antipsychotic (a class of medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 52 residents. Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure sanitary food storage in the therapy room refrigerator and failed to maintain the microwave in a sanitary manner. Findings included: - Observation, on 05/29/24 at 01:30 PM, with Maintenance Staff U, revealed unlabeled, undated hamburger patties in the therapy room refrigerator freezer. The freezer also contained two medical devices for cold therapy and multiple cold packs. The lower shelf of the freezer contained a purple sticky substance. The refrigerator contained the following items of concern: 1. An undated open container of almond milk with an expiration date of 12/20/23. 2. Four containers of yogurt with expiration date of 12/23/23 and a multi pack of 24 small containers of yogurt with expiration dated of 12/23/23. 3. A sack which contained various foods in undated, unmarked Styrofoam containers with a date of 04/10/24, found on a small bag of chicken strips. 4. A 32-ounce opened container of chicken broth, without an open date. Observation on 05/29/24 at 01:30 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 52 residents with 16 residents selected for review, which included one resident reviewed for accommodation of needs. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff assessed one Resident (R) 4, for positioning devices in a timely manner. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 4's medical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic back pain, osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain) and left wrist abscess (cavity containing pus and surrounded by inflamed tissue). The Five Day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated normal cognitive function. The ADL (Activity of Daily Living) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 04/12/24, assessed the resident had a diagnosis of osteoarthritis, R4 had impairment to one side of his lower extremity, and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 52 residents with 16 sampled for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one Resident (R) 25, regarding opioid medications (a powerful pain-reducing medication). Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of chronic pain (pain which persists for a long period). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. She received scheduled and as needed (PRN) medication and reported occasional pain which affected her sleep and day to day activities. She reported the worse pain in the past five days was a four on the one to ten pain scale. The MDS inaccurately documented the resident did not receive opioid medication (a powerful pain-reducing medication). The Pain Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 12/22/23, documented the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 52 residents with 16 sampled, including four residents reviewed for accident hazards. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were maintained for Resident (R)13. This placed the resident at increased risk for further falls, injury, and pain. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)13's Electronic Medical Record revealed diagnoses that included Huntington's disease (rare abnormal hereditary condition characterized by progressive mental deterioration; a disabling central nervous system movement disorder), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The resident had two or more nonmajor injury falls since the prior assessment. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 52 residents with 16 residents sampled, including five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R) 25 remained free from unnecessary medications related to the failure to administer as needed (PRN) medications for lack of bowel movements (BM) for longer than three days. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of constipation (inability to pass stool). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. She was dependent on staff for toileting needs, had no behaviors, and rejected cares one to three days of the assessment period. She was occasionally incontinent of bowel and had no constipation. The Behavioral Symptoms Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 12/22/23, documented the resident would frequently refuse bowel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions for the residents of the facility. Findings included: - During the initial tour of the kitchen on 09/12/22 at 10:10 AM, Dietary Staff EE was cleaning the refrigerator in the kitchen using a sanitizing solution. Testing of the cleaning solution, at that time, revealed 0 ppm result when checked with a test strip. The liquid sanitizing solution the staff used to sanitize the refrigerator lacked any actual sanitizing solution in the water. On 09/12/22 at 10:12 AM, Dietary Staff EE stated the solution should be between 150-200 ppm and she had made the cleaning solution five to 10 minutes prior to this testing. Dietary Staff EE stated she checks the cleaning solution twice during her shift. Dietary staff EE made a new solution which tested at 400-500 ppm. On 09/14/22 at 11:34 AM, Dietary Staff EE was placing the pureed cake from the mixer into a bowl upon entry into the kitchen to observe pureed diet meal prep.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-09-15 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective quality assurance committee that identified, developed and implemented appropriate intervention plans of action in a timely manner to ensure the residents received adequate needed quality care from the facility. Findings included: - Interview, on 09/15/22 at 01:41 PM, with Administrative Staff A, revealed the facility Quality Assurance Committee met monthly and the last meeting was on 09/2021. Administrative Staff A revealed the committee identified concerns with pressure ulcers, restorative and therapy communication issues, maintenance and housekeeping issues, and food temperatures. However, these areas were not corrected with the QAA interventions as the resurvey included these areas and others as reflected below: 1.) Refer to F 561: The facility failed to provide individual choices for the one sampled dependent Resident (R)55 related to his preferences for clothing selection 2.) Refer to F F677: The facility failed to ensure three of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to handle, store, process and transport linens to prevent the spread of infection for the residents of the facility. Findings included: - On the laundry tour, on 09/15/22 at 07:58 AM, with Maintenance/Laundry Director staff U, explained that the laundry staff had not arrived for work so the laundry tour would in effect demonstrate how the laundry was left by the laundry staff the previous evening. The tour with maintenance/Housekeeping Director U revealed the following concerns: 1. The washing machine was full of clothes. 2. The vinyl floor throughout the laundry was heavily soiled. 3. The soiled laundry room had four plastic bags of soiled laundry directly on the floor. 4. The soiled laundry sorting area with three uncovered barrels of soiled laundry had linen spilling over the sides of the barrels. 5. The laundry room walls in the clean linen processing area had loose peeling sheet rock with multiple holes in the sheet rock, which created an unsanitizable surface.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior in resident areas including rooms, bathrooms and in a shower room. Findings included: - A brief tour of resident rooms and care areas beginning on 09/15/22 at 09:13 AM, revealed the following areas of concern: Five bathrooms with caulking missing/cracked/dirty around the toilets. Two rooms with gaps in the tile and debris present in the gaps. Five resident bathrooms with dirty floors. Two bathrooms with a dirty toilet. One room with an approximate 6 inch by 6 inch, hole in the wall. Five rooms with chipped paint to the doorways. One room with peeling wall paint. One room with a wash basin and bedpan stored directly on the floor. One room with a urinal dated 07/26/22, stored in a bag, with yellow liquid at the bottom of the bag. One of the shower rooms had rust-colored caulking around the toilet, a slow drip from the sink, the toilet had water running…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - The Medical Diagnosis tab located in the electronic medical record (EMR), for Resident (R)20, included diagnoses of a pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) stage four (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle) of the sacral (area of the lower back near the spine) region, morbid obesity (a disorder involving excessive body fat, body mass index [BMI] greater than 40), and lymphedema (swelling caused by accumulation of lymph [a fluid that flows through the lymphatic system]). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], assessed R20 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. She required supervision and setup for eating and drinking. R20's height was 60 inches and she weighed 263 pounds and did not/was not known if she had any weight loss greater than five percent in the last month or greater than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 68 residents with 22 selected for review including nine residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as result of pressure, pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment to Resident (R)43 in a timely manner to a pressure ulcer on the coccyx (the area below the sacrum commonly known as the tailbone), failed to ensure a dressing was in place and the air mattress settings were correct for R20 who had a stage four (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle) pressure ulcer of the sacral (area of the lower back near the spine) region, failed to ensure R11's who admitted with a stage four sacral wound and acquired an unstageable pressure area due to eschar to both heels that the air mattress was at the appropriate setting. Additionally, the facility failed to implement interventions and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 66 residents with 22 selected for review, which included five residents reviewed for dialysis. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate dialysis (a process that filters wastes and fluids from the body when the kidneys fail) care of pre and post weight assessments and details of the dialysis sessions with the dialysis provider as required for five of the five residents reviewed, 02 Resident (R)53, R41, R118, and R262. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)50's Physician Order Sheet, dated 08/09/22, revealed diagnoses included end stage renal (kidney) disease and diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with normal cognition, and received dialysis. The Care Plan, revised 08/25/22, instructed staff the resident received dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays. Staff to monitor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary housekeeping and maintenance services to the facility kitchen areas, to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for the residents of the facility. Findings included: - The initial tour of the kitchen on 09/12/22 at 10:03 AM, revealed the following items/areas of concern: 1. The door frame and the inside of the door entering the kitchen had areas of chipped paint. 2. Under the counter of the dishwashing area near the entry door lacked cove base and the strip of cove base under the dishwasher pipes was loose. 3. The wall below the dishwasher had a large area of chipped paint. 4. The ice machine drain hoses were in the drain and the drain lacked a cover. On 09/14/22 at 03:03 PM, the kitchen tour revealed the following concerns: 1. The ceiling by the light above the microwave area had a crack approximately one-and-a-half feet long. 2. The light cover near the dishwasher had dead insects/debris in it. 3. The cove base was missing in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 68 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, for the residents of the facility, with the presence of flies in various areas of the facility. Findings included: - The pest control Service Inspection Report dated 06/24/22 revealed the facility reported no issues. The fly lights were checked, and glue boards replaced as needed. The kitchen drains were dusted, and an application of an aerosol fly bait were applied to multiple areas for small fly control. The pest control Service Inspection Report dated 07/29/22 revealed the facility reported no issues. The fly light glue boards were replaced as needed and an application of an aerosol fly bait to multiple areas of the kitchen for small fly control. The pest control Service Inspection Report dated 08/25/22 revealed all fly light glue boards were replaced as needed and applied an aerosol fly bait to the dish sink area in the kitchen for small fly control. On 09/14/22 at 11:34 PM, observation in the kitchen food areas…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 68 residents with 22 sampled which included one resident reviewed for choices. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide individual choices for the one sampled dependent Resident (R)55 related to his preferences for clothing selection. Findings included: - Review of the resident's (R)55's, Physician Orders, dated 08/03/2022, revealed diagnoses which included, obstructive pulmonary disease, severe sepsis, acute kidney failure, abnormal results of liver function, pneumonia, cellulitis of right lower limb, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, and morbid obesity. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact. He required extensive assistance of staff for bed mobility, dressing, personal hygiene, and was totally dependent on staff for transfers. The resident weighed 453 pounds. He reported it was very important to select his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 68 residents, with 22 sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Comprehensive Assessment, and Quarterly Assessment, respectively related to the use of a Continuous Positive Air Pressure (CPAP) machine for one sampled Resident (R)55. Findings included: - Review of the resident's (R) 55's, Physician Orders, dated 08/03/2022, revealed diagnoses which included, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact. He exhibited difficulty breathing and/or was short of breath (SOB) on exertion, when sitting at rest, and when lying flat. The MDS lacked documentation of the resident's use of a CPAP machine. The Quarterly MDS, dated 08/15/22, lacked any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 68 residents with 22 selected for review. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans for one of the sampled residents, Resident (R)30 with range of motion impairments and the lack of a restorative program. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)30's Physician's Order Sheet, dated 07/28/22, revealed diagnoses included stroke (sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), muscle weakness, and chronic kidney disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with severely impaired cognitive status, and was totally dependent on two staff for bed mobility and transfers. The resident had bilateral (both) impairment of upper and lower extremities. The ADL (Activity of Daily Living) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment(CAA), dated 07/24/22 did not trigger…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 68 residents with 22 selected for review including four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of the sampled residents, Resident (R)4, R39, and R46, who required staff assistance, received appropriate personal hygiene assistance for cleaning and trimming of their fingernails. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis tab located in the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident (R)4 included diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), cerebral infarction (stroke - damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area), and diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R4 assessed him with a short-term and a long-term memory problem, impaired decision making, and he did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 68 residents with 22 selected for review which included one resident selected for review of hospice services. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate care between hospice services and the facility to ensure the resident's advance directive for no resuscitative measures determined and carried out. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)113's Physician Order Sheet, dated [DATE], revealed diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm (tumor) of the lung, adult failure to thrive and osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain.) The resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an order for hospice services. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with severely impaired cognitive status with altered level of consciousness. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility with no impairment in functional range of motion in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 68 resident with 22 selected for review, which included four residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe transfer techniques for one resident (R) 34 of the four residents reviewed. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)34's Physician Order Sheet, dated 08/02/22, revealed diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with severe cognitive deficit, constant inattention and altered level of consciousness. The resident was dependent on two staff for bed mobility and transfers. The resident had impairment in functional range of motion on one side of her upper and lower extremities. The Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 02/21/22, assessed the resident required staff assistance for stabilization. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 68 residents with 22 selected for review including two residents reviewed for urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of the two residents, Resident (R)20's catheter drainage bag remained below bladder level and failed to drain the catheter bag in a sanitary manner to prevent urinary tract infection. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis tab located in the electronic record (EMR) for Resident (R)20 included diagnoses of infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, overactive bladder, and a pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) stage four (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle) of the sacral (area of the lower back near the spine)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 68 residents, with 22 sampled, which included one resident sampled for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care to maintain respiratory equipment to prevent the spread of infection, for the one sampled Resident (R) 55. Findings included: - Resident (R) 55's Physician Orders, dated 08/03/2022, revealed diagnoses which included, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact. The resident required extensive assistance of staff for bed mobility. He exhibited difficulty breathing and/or was short of breath (SOB) on exertion, when sitting at rest, and when lying flat. The MDS lacked documentation of the use of a Continuous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 68 residents with 22 selected for review. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify the physician for one of the residents, Resident (R)20, when she experienced a significant weight loss. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis tab located in the electronic medical record (EMR), for Resident (R)20, included diagnoses of a pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) stage four (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle) of the sacral (area of the lower back near the spine) region, morbid obesity (a disorder involving excessive body fat, body mass index [BMI] greater than 40), and lymphedema (swelling caused by accumulation of lymph [a fluid that flows through the lymphatic system). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], assessed R20 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 68 residents. The sample of 22 residents included six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of multiple medications as ordered by the physician, for one resident of the six sampled residents; (R)60 related to pain medication and medications to treat gastrointestinal acid reflux (indigestion/heartburn). Findings included: - Review of the resident's (R)'s, Physician Orders, dated 08/03/22, revealed diagnoses which included fracture around right hip joint, hematemesis (person vomits blood due to internal bleeding), gastroesophageal reflux disease (backflow of stomach contents to the esophagus), peripheral vascular disease (a blood circulation disorder that causes the blood vessels outside of the heart and brain to narrow which typically causes pain), fracture of right foot metatarsal bone(s) (broken bones in the forefoot), cellulitis (skin infection) left lower limb, and fracture of the right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 68 residents which included five residents reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two of the five residents (R24 and R 12) or their representatives received information/education for the benefits, risks, or medical contraindications regarding pneumococcal immunization. Findings included - On 09/14/22 review of Resident (R) 24 and (R) 12's immunization records revealed the medical records lacked evidence of pneumococcal education provided, prior to consent or refusal of the pneumococcal vaccination. On 09/14/22 at 01:24 PM, Administrative Nurse E verified the above findings related to immunization. She stated the resident and/or their representative should be provided with education regarding the benefit verses the risks of the pneumococcal vaccine prior to deciding to receive or refuse the vaccine. She agreed the facility lacked evidence the facility provided education to R24 and R12 and/or their representatives prior to their giving consent or refusing the vaccine, as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES — 30 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
The other 29 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CORONADO OPERATOR, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/01/2019 |
| BARRES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2019 |
| CURIS HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2019 |
| T AND C CAPITAL ASSETS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2019 |
| WINDWARD HEALTH PARTNERS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2019 |
| YOAKUM, JAMIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/21/2024 |
| MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2019 |
| PITTSBURG OPERATOR, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2019 |
| BUCKLE, WHITNEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2019 |
| LINDEMAN, STUART | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2019 |
| THOMAS, TINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $290K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175208. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.