Spring Hill Care And Rehab
251 E Wilson Avenue, Spring Hill, KS 66083 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 45 certified beds · (913) 592-3100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent Nov 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $14,069 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-18)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (80%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.8% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.5% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 2.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.3% | 6.5% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.0% | 4.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.6% | 16.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.6% | 23.2% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.2% | 4.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 33.3% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.3% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 44.4% | 73.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.1% | 22.4% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 24.0% | 11.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.67 | 1.80 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.49 | 2.13 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 45% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.0%CMS range 34.7–57.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.4%CMS range 8.7–17.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 3.8–13.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.23 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 32.7 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 80% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 29 residents, including three residents sampled for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from staff-to-resident abuse on 10/11/25, when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M verbally, mentally, and physically abused R1. This deficient practice placed R1 in immediate jeopardy.Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of displaced fracture (traumatic bone break where two ends of the bone separate out of their normal positions) of the first cervical (neck) vertebra (bone of the spinal column), bilateral hearing loss, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness).The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented R1 had moderate hearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included three residents, with three residents reviewed for notification of changes. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to notify Resident (R) 1's representative of changes in condition, plan of care changes, and results. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for further decline and a delay in treatment.Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of generalized muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain).The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 06/19/25, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven, which indicated severe cognitive impairment.The Cognitive Loss/Dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) Care Area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included three residents, with three residents reviewed for dental services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to obtain emergency dental services for Resident (R) 1 after he broke a tooth on 03/27/25. This deficient practice had the risk of dental pain, difficulty eating, and unnecessary physical complications for R1.Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of generalized muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain).The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 06/19/25, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven, which indicated severe cognitive impairment.The Cognitive Loss/Dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-11 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The facility failed to provide the services of a full-time certified dietary manager for the 36 residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 09/09/25 at 08:23 AM, Dietary Staff BB stated she was currently in class to become a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). Dietary Staff BB stated the Registered Dietician (RD) came to the facility monthly. The facility's Food Service Staffing policy last reviewed 10/2024 documented the facility would employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-11 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to conduct a thorough facility-wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. This failure affected all 36 residents residing in the facility. Findings Included: - On 06/09/25 Administrative Staff A provided a Facility Assessment updated 12/2024. A review of the assessment revealed the following: The assessment failed to identify the specific staffing levels needed for each unit and identify the number of Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Nurses (LPN/LVN), Certified Medication Aides (CMA), and Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) needed for each unit, patient acuity, and census. The assessment lacked staffing levels required for each shift, day, and weekend. On 06/09/25 a review of the facility's Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ - Staffing Data Report) from 04/01/24 to 03/31/25 revealed excessively low weekend staffing triggered on Quarter Three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with three reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to secure pressurized supplemental oxygen tanks in a safe, locked area, and out of reach of the 22 cognitively impaired independently mobile residents. The facility additionally failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for Resident (R) 12 and R4. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for preventable accidents and injuries. Findings included: - On 06/11/25 at 07:58 AM, a walkthrough of the facility revealed an unsecured oxygen storage room. The room contained 35 pressurized supplemental oxygen cylinder tanks stored in floor racks. The room had a key lock on the entry door. On 06/11/25 at 11:35 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated oxygen should be stored in a locked room in a storage rack. On 06/11/25 at 11:52 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M stated oxygen tanks should be stored in a locked room in storage racks. On 06/11/25 at 12:05 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she expected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The facility identified eight residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to store Resident (R) 33, R34, R6, and R1's respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner, and the facility further failed to transport linens in a sanitary manner. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Included findings: - On 06/09/25 at 07:44 AM, a walkthrough of the facility was completed. On 06/09/25 at 07:57 AM, R33 laid on her right side in her bed. R33's CPAP mask was draped over the CPAP machine without a clean barrier and sanitary container. On 06/09/25 at 07:59 AM, R34 laid on his back on his bed. R34's CPAP mask laid on the floor on the right side of his bed. R34's CPAP machine without a clean barrier and sanitary container. On 06/09/25 at 08:02 AM, R6's nebulizer (a device that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a dignified care environment for Resident (R) 20. This deficient practice placed R20 at risk for impaired dignity and unmet care needs. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R20's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH - non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency, and urinary tract infections), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R20's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 04/15/25 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated he used a walker for mobility. The MDs noted he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one resident reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent an episode of resident-to-resident sexual abuse between cognitively impaired Resident (R) 21 and R17. This deficient practice placed R17 at ongoing risk for preventable abuse and mistreatment. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R21's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), muscle weakness, repeated falls, and the need for assistance with personal care. R21's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 04/27/25 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated she had bilateral lower extremity impairments and used a wheelchair for mobility. The MDS indicated he was dependent on staff for bathing, toileting, personal hygiene, transfers, and bed mobility. The MDS indicated no behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1's psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medication had an indication for administration. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for ineffective treatment, unnecessary medication use, and unwarranted side effects. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), calculus (a hardened deposit, usually composed of mineral salts, that forms within the body) of the gallbladder, and diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 09/19/24 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to indicate on the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) that Resident (R) 33 received and required the use of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP- ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep the airway open during sleep). This placed R33 at risk for inaccurate reflections of the resident's status and needs to develop an individualized comprehensive plan of care. Findings included: - R33's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of acquired absence of right foot, pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) of sacral region, hematogenous osteomyelitis (a type of bone infection where bacteria travel through the bloodstream to the bones, causing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for care plan revisions. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to revise Resident (R) 20's Care Plan to remove his therapeutic diet. This deficient practice placed R20 at risk for uncommunicated care needs. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R20's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH - non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency, and urinary tract infections), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R20's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 04/15/25 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated he used a walker for mobility. The MDs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for care plan revisions. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to revise Resident (R) 20's Care Plan to remove his therapeutic diet. This deficient practice placed R20 at risk for uncommunicated care needs. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R20's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH - non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency, and urinary tract infections), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R20's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 04/15/25 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated he used a walker for mobility. The MDs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 9 with assistance with eating and further failed to ensure R9's call light was within his reach. This defiant practice placed R9 at risk of aspiration and unmet needs. Findings included: - R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body)following cerebrovascular accident (CVA-stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) effecting left non-dominant side, pulmonary edema (accumulation of extravascular fluid in the lung tissues), pain, obesity (excessive calories), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with three reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 27's pressure-reducing low air-loss mattress (specialized air mattress used to reduce the pressure applied to the body) was utilized per her weight and manufacturer's safe use recommendations. The facility additionally failed to apply R9's pressure-reducing boots, which were used to off-load the heels of his feet per his care plan. These deficient practices placed both residents at risk for preventable wounds and impaired wound healing. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R27's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), muscle failure, and kyphosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 33's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP - ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep the airway open during sleep) mask was stored in a sanitary manner. This placed R33 at an increased risk for respiratory infection and complications. Findings included: - R33's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of the acquired absence of right foot, pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) of sacral region, hematogenous osteomyelitis (a type of bone infection where bacteria travel through the bloodstream to the bones, causing inflammation and potentially bone destruction), lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two residents reviewed for dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 17 with dementia services related to supervision and accidents. The defiant practice placed R17 at risk for preventable accidents. Findings Included: - R17's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of a history of falls, muscle weakness, hypothyroidism (a condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland), insomnia (inability to sleep), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), unsteadiness on feet, and peripheral vascular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported irregularities in Resident (R) 1's medication which lacked an indication for administration. The facility also failed to ensure the CP identified and reported the physician's order for monitoring the pulse for an antihypertensive (a class of medication used to treat high blood pressure) medication. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for unnecessary medication use, side effects, and physical complications. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), calculus (a hardened deposit, usually composed of mineral salts, that forms within the body) of the gallbladder, and diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician parameters were followed for a hypertensive medication (class of medication used to treat hypertension (high blood pressure) for Resident (R) 1. The facility also failed to ensure R1's medication had an indication for administration. These deficient practices placed R1 at risk for the potential of unnecessary medication administration thus leading to possible harmful side effects. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), calculus (a hardened deposit, usually composed of mineral salts, that forms within the body) of the gallbladder, and diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two residents reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a description of the medication and equipment provided to Resident (R) 12 by hospice. This deficient practice created a risk for missed or delayed services, impaired physical, and psychosocial care for R12. Findings included: - R12's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), and cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 01/17/25 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R12 was dependent on staff assistance for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-04 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 43 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours, seven days a week. This placed all residents in the facility at risk for decreased quality of care. Findings included: - RN coverage documentation for 04/22/23 - 04/23/23 and 06/17/23 - 06/20/23 was requested from the facility. The facility provided documents Direct Care Staffing for Spring Hill Care and Rehab recorded the name of the nurse who provided RN coverage each day. The documents listed the following dates where RN coverage was recorded as provided by Administrative Nurse E (the former Director of Nursing): 04/23/23 and 06/19/23. Upon request, the facility was unable to provide verifiable times which demonstrated the eight consecutive hours as required for Administrative Nurse E on the above dates. On 10/03/23 at 11:08 AM Administrative Nurse D stated that Administrative Nurse F clocked in for work and her hours would be logged; however, she did not clock in as she worked in a salary position.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-04 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents and five Certified Nurse Aide's (CNA) reviewed for performance evaluations and required in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure four of the five CNA staff reviewed had the required yearly performance evaluations completed. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care. Findings included: - Review of the facility's performance evaluation records revealed the following: CNA N, hired 11/09/18, last annual performance evaluation provided by the facility was dated for a review period of January 2019 to December 2019. No further yearly performance evaluations were provided by the facility for CNA N after 2019. CNA O, hired 07/08/22, no yearly performance evaluations were provided upon request. CNA P, hired 04/06/22, no yearly performance evaluations were provided upon request. CNA Q, hired 08/23/21, no yearly performance evaluations were provided upon request. On 10/04/23 at 01:44 PM Administrative Staff A stated Administrative Staff B would have provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-04 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 43 residents. Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a certified infection preventionist to oversee the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP). This deficient practice placed all residents at increased risk for infections related to lack of identification, tracking/trending, and treatment of infections. Findings included: - A review of the facility's infection control log indicated the facility infection control log for July, August, and September 2023 indicated the facility had 16 urinary tract infections and 15 upper respiratory infections. On 10/02/23 at 09:30AM, Administrative Nurse D reported that she assumed the responsibilities of infection preventionist (IP) after the previous IP nurse quit the facility. She stated that she was currently working on becoming certified. She reported the last IP quit in July of 2023. On 10/03/23 at 10:20AM, Administrative Staff A reported the facility recently had lost two IP's within the last year. He reported Administrative Nurse D was completing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-04 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — patternNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 43 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a criminal background check as required for two employees. The two employees were allowed access to residents without knowing if they had been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property or mistreatment by a court of law. The deficient practice placed affected residents at risk for abuse, neglect, misappropriation, or mistreatment. Findings included: - Employee review of Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M revealed a hire date of 04/06/20. The facility was unable to produce the results of CNA M's background check upon request. Employee review of Licensed Nurse (LN) H revealed a hire date of 03/12/19. The facility was unable to produce the results of LN H's background check upon request. On 10/03/23 at 03:52 PM Administrative Staff B stated that the facility did not have the background checks for CNA M or LN H. She stated that they ran the background check for CNA M but do not have the results. She further stated LN H was hired during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for accommodation of needs. Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)33's care planned adaptive equipment to support his dietary needs during meal service. The facility additionally failed to provide R27 wheelchair foot pedals during transport. This deficient practice placed both residents at risk for decreased quality of care. Findings Included: - R33's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) noted diagnoses of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD- backflow of stomach contents to the esophagus), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and delusional disorder (untrue persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue). R33's Quarterly Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notification of the reason and location for the facility-initiated transfer for Resident (R)35. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk of delayed care or uncommunicated care needs. Findings Included: - R35's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) noted diagnoses of morbid obesity (severely overweight), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. R35's EMR recorded a Discharge Assessment-Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) which recorded R35 discharged to the acute hospital on [DATE]. R35's Entry Tracking Record MDS documented R35 returned to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a copy of the facility bed hold policy to Resident (R)35 and/or their representative, with a written notice specifying the duration and cost of the bed hold, at the time of the resident's two transfers to the hospital. This placed the resident at risk for impaired rights. Findings Included: - R35's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) noted diagnoses of morbid obesity (severely overweight), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. R35's EMR recorded a Discharge Assessment-Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) which recorded R35 discharged to the acute hospital on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, The facility failed to update/revise Residents (R)9 care plans to reflect post-fall interventions and changes in assistive care requirements. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for preventable injuries and ineffective treatment due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings Included: - R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) noted a diagnose of overactive bladder, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), abnormalities of gait and mobility, fracture of left femur (broken large bone), obesity (overweight), and history of falls. R9's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 06/01/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated she required limited assistance from one staff for transfers, bed mobility, locomotion, and walking. The MDS indicated no previous falls. The MDS noted she used a walker for mobility. R9's Quarterly MDS completed 08/08/23 indicated her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 43. The sample included 12 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)33 had an appropriate indication for use, or a documented physician rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the continued use of Zyprexa (antipsychotic-class of medications used to treat major mental conditions which cause a break from reality). This deficient practice placed R33 at risk of unnecessary medication administration and possible adverse side effects. Findings Included: - R33's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) noted a diagnose of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and delusional disorder (untrue persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue). R33's Quarterly Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one resident reviewed for reasonable accommodations. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed provide Resident (R)37 with access to his room's assigned telephone. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings Included: - The electronic medical records (EMR) documented the following diagnosis for R37: hemiplegia affecting right dominant side (paralysis of right side of the body), intracranial hemorrhage (loss of a large amount of blood in a short period of time), cerebral aneurysm (rupture of an artery to the brain), hypertension (high blood pressure), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), gout (inflammation of the joints), constipation (difficulty passing stools), hyperlipidemia (condition of elevated blood lipid levels), cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder). A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-03 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents with three reviewed for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Beneficiary Liability notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide form CMS 10055, Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN), which included the estimated cost for continued services for skilled services to the resident or their representative for the two residents, Resident (R) 28, and R32. This deficient practice placed both residents at risk for uninformed decisions and unanticipated costs related to skilled services. Findings included: - The Medicare ABN form informed the beneficiaries that Medicare may not pay for future skilled therapy and did not provide an estimated cost to continue their services. The form included an option for the beneficiary to (1) receive specified services listed, and bill Medicare for an official decision on payment. I understand if Medicare does not pay, I will be responsible for payment, but can appeal to Medicare. (2) receive therapy listed, but do not bill Medicare, I am…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed provide R37 with a comfortable home-like environment as evidenced by loud television noises in his room and uncomfortable water temperatures during showers. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for impaired psychosocial well-being. -Findings Included: -The electronic medical records (EMR) documented the following diagnosis for R37: hemiplegia affecting right dominant side (paralysis of right side of the body), intracranial hemorrhage (loss of a large amount of blood in a short period of time), cerebral aneurysm (rupture of an artery to the brain), hypertension (high blood pressure), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), gout (inflammation of the joints), constipation (difficulty passing stools), hyperlipidemia (condition of elevated blood lipid levels), cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, and major depressive disorder (major mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents, five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported irregularities for hypertensive medication (class of medication used to treat hypertension (high blood pressure) given outside the physician ordered parameters. which had the potential of unnecessary medication administration thus leading to possible harmful side effects. The CP had not reported irregularities related to physician notification and insulin (medication to regulate blood sugar) administered when blood sugar was outside the physician ordered parameters for Resident (R) 24. These failures placed the resident at risk for possible harmful side effects. Findings included: - R24's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents, five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed ensure that hypertensive medication (class of medication used to treat hypertension (high blood pressure) given outside the physician ordered parameters. which had the potential of unnecessary medication administration thus leading to possible harmful side effects. The facility failed to ensure the physician was notified and insulin (medication to regulate blood sugar) administered when blood sugar was outside the physician ordered parameters for Resident (R) 24. These failures placed the resident at risk for possible harmful side effects. Findings included: - R24's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), depression (abnormal emotional state…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-06-11 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to post its updated daily posted staffing sheet. Findings included: - On 06/09/25 at 07:04 AM an inspection of the facility revealed the facility's Direct Care Report form posted on the wall across from the nurse's station. The form was dated 06/06/25. On 06/09/25 at 07:04 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) I stated nursing staff were responsible for updating the form each day and posting it. On 06/11/25 at 12:24 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated the charge nurse was responsible for creating and posting the staffing form each day. A review of the facility's Staffing policy revised 11/2023 indicated that staffing hours must be maintained for facility records for a minimum of 18 months. The policy indicated the records must be made available upon request.
- No harm found · C2025-06-11 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to submit accurate staffing information to the federal regulatory agency through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ - Staffing Data Report), when the facility failed to submit accurate weekend staffing coverage hours. This placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing inadequate staffing. Findings included: - A review of the facility's submitted PBJ data from 04/01/24 through 03/31/25 indicated the facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing for Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter Three (04/01/24 to 06/30/24) and FY Quarter Four (07/01/24 to 09/30/24). A review of the facility's working schedule, time sheets/punches, and posted staffing hours indicated no gaps or loss of hours. On 06/09/25, a review of the Facility Assessment updated 12/2024 revealed the assessment failed to identify the specific staffing levels needed for each unit and identify the number of Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Nurses (LPN/LVN), Certified Medication Aides…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$14,069 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $14,069 — penalty dated 2025-11-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES — 30 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 29 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BARRES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2019 |
| CORONADO OPERATOR, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2019 |
| CURIS HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2019 |
| T AND C CAPITAL ASSETS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2019 |
| WINDWARD HEALTH PARTNERS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2019 |
| YOAKUM, JAMIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/24/2024 |
| MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2019 |
| SPRING HILL OPERATOR, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2019 |
| BURFORD, TODD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2019 |
| LINDEMAN, STUART | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2019 |
| THOMAS, TINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $247K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175425. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.