No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lansing Care And Rehab

210 Plaza Drive, Lansing, KS 66043 · For profit - Corporation · 58 certified beds · (913) 727-1284 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (913) 727-1284 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$23,454 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (24) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $23,454 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-27)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1004 Progress Drive Suite 120 · (913) 680-1008 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4101 S 4th St · (913) 682-2000 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.7 mi
1217 N Main St · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
213 Highland Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.3%17.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.8%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder4.2%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.2%2.9%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms38.7%6.5%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%4.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.8%16.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.6%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.4%4.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.4%22.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.3%18.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.7%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.5%73.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission36.9%22.4%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit0.0%11.5%12.0%check this — see note marked star below the table

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 43.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.8%CMS range 37.3–66.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.4%CMS range 8.8–18.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge41.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 4.8–12.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.30
RN hours/ resident / day
1.08
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.38
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.76
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
45.3%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 58 beds and averages 50.7 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-17)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-08)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility documented a census of 52 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from preventable accidents when staff turned cognitively impaired Resident (R) 1 and her wheelchair into her bed on 02/01/26, causing R1 to hit her left knee on the bed frame and R1 cried out in pain that staff broke her knee. The direct care staff decided to hug transfer R1 to bed without help from another direct care staff and R1 screamed they broke my [expletive] knee. R1 was dependent on staff for transfers and mobility in her wheelchair. The direct care staff informed the Nurse on 02/01/26 of the increased pain to R1's left lower extremity. On 02/03/26 the staff reported the bruising and an x-ray revealed R1 had an oblique fracture (a type of bone break where the fracture line runs at an angle, and are often caused by rotational force or sudden, direct force when the bone is hit from an angle) to her proximal tibia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 50 residents. Three residents were reviewed for catheter (flexible tubing inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) care. Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to provide appropriate catheter cares for Resident (R) 1's indwelling urinary catheter when staff failed to provide flushes as ordered by the physician to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI), failed to ensure catheter cares were provided using acceptable standards of infection control practices, and failed to ensure interventions were consistently and correctly implemented to anchor the catheter to prevent worsening of catheter associated trauma. This deficient practice resulted in catheter related complications including UTI and traumatic injury caused by the indwelling urinary catheter. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (a problem in which a person lacks bladder control due to a brain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The facility identified nine residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms, which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) and one resident on contact precautions (safeguards designed to reduce the risk of transmission of microorganisms by direct or indirect contact). Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 62's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP- ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep the airway open during sleep) mask was stored in a sanitary manner, and further failed to develop, implement, and maintain a water management program to reduce the risk of Legionella (Legionella is a bacterium which can cause pneumonia in vulnerable populations) and other waterborne pathogens. Findings included:- On 09/22/25 at 08:13 AM, R62 sat in her recliner, waiting for breakfast. R62's unbagged CPAP mask rested directly on her bedside table.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with one medication room, three medication carts, and two treatment carts. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately store medications and biologicals when staff failed to ensure the medication carts were always locked when the cart was not within the nurses' line of sight. Findings included:- On 09/22/25 at 07:33 AM, the treatment cart containing residents' treatment supplies, as-needed (PRN) creams, and insulin (hormone medication used to lower blood glucose) pens was unlocked. The cart was in the 200 Hall, and the Administrative Nurse E locked the medication cart. On 09/24/25 at 11:45 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated that medication carts and treatment carts should be locked if the staff have stepped away and were out of their visual sight. On 09/24/25 at 11:55 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated that medication carts and treatment carts should be locked if the LN or Certified Medication Aide (CMA) could not see the cart.The facility's Storage of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with three reviewed for dignity and respect. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a dignified care environment for Residents (R) 21 and R18. Findings Included:- R21's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of quadriplegia (inability to move the arms, legs, and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), type two diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder). R21's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 08/19/25 indicated a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (intact cognition). The MDS noted bilateral upper or lower extremity impairments. The MDS noted she used a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with two reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent staff-to-resident verbal and emotional abuse of Resident (R) 44. Findings Included:- R44's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), muscle weakness, repeated falls, and the need for assistance with personal care. R44's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 06/14/25 indicated a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero (severe cognitive impairment). The MDS noted bilateral upper or lower extremity impairments. The MDS noted she used a wheelchair for mobility. The MDS noted she was dependent on staff assistance for toileting, bathing, transfers, bed mobility, personal hygiene, and dressing. The MDS noted no behavioral concerns. R44's Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment (CAA) completed 12/21/24 indicated she required staff assistance to complete her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale which included the multiple unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefits for the continued use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) for Resident (R) 27, who had a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). Findings included:- R27's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of dementia, repeated falls, muscle weakness, and Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with three residents reviewed for hospice. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change in the physical condition and complete a comprehensive Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident (R) 22 with the addition of hospice services. Findings included:- R22's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and gastroesophageal reflux (GERD- backflow of stomach contents to the esophagus). The Significant Change MDS initiated on 08/28/25 was not completed for R22's admission on to hospice services. R22 was admitted to hospice services on 08/15/25. R22's Care Area Assessment (CAA) was not completed in the 14 days required after the Significant Change MDS was started on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 16 residents. One resident was sampled for accidents and hazards. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 18's fall interventions as directed by his care plan. Findings included:- R18's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN- high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (condition of elevated blood lipid levels), cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), fracture of left pubic ramus fracture (a break or crack in the pelvis bones), diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), and aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) had identified and reported irregularities for Resident (R) 22. Findings included:- R22's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and gastroesophageal reflux (GERD- backflow of stomach contents to the esophagus). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 12/21/24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R22 had received insulin (medication to regulate blood sugar), a diuretic (a medication to promote the formation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) test to monitor for adverse effects from the medication Reglan (antiemetic-prevents vomiting) for Resident (R) 22. Findings included:- R22's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and gastroesophageal reflux (GERD- backflow of stomach contents to the esophagus). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 12/21/24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R22 had received insulin (medication to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 58 residents. The sample included 16 residents, with three residents reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a description of the medication and equipment provided to Resident (R) 22 by hospice. Findings included:- R22's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and gastroesophageal reflux (GERD- backflow of stomach contents to the esophagus).The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) initiated on 08/28/25 was not completed for R22's admission into hospice services. R22 was admitted to hospice services on 08/15/25.R22's Care Area Assessment (CAA) was not completed in the 14 days required after the Significant Change MDS was started on 08/25/25. R22's Care Plan dated 08/28/25 documented the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 12 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for self-determination. Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to accommodate Resident (R)28's preferred sleep schedule. This deficient practice placed R28 at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R28's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease (PVD- slow and progressive circulation disorder causing narrowing, blockage, or spasms in a blood vessel), hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). R28's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 01/10/24 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating intact cognition. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) form 10055 Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN) form was provided to Resident (R) 13. This placed R13 residents at risk of uninformed treatment decisions and unexpected costs. Findings included: - A review of R13's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the Medicare Part A episode began on 09/06/23 and ended on 10/02/23. R13 remained in the facility for custodial care. A review of R13's EMR revealed the ABN form CMS-10055 was not provided as required after her Medicare Part A coverage ended. On 02/08/24 at 01:05 PM Administrative Nurse F stated it was brought to the management's attention that the ABN form was not being issued to the residents as it should be. The facility lacked a policy for ABN Notification. The facility failed to ensure R13 was provided with CMS ABN Form 10055. This placed this resident at risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notification of the reason and location for the facility-initiated transfer for Resident (R)43 and R47. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk of delayed care or uncommunicated care needs. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R43's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of end-stage renal failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness, cerebral infarction (stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), and type two diabase mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). R43's EMR recorded a Discharge Assessment-Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported missed medication administrations related to Resident (R)28's prescribed insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) and metoprolol (medication used to treat high blood pressure) on the monthly reports. This practice placed R28 at risk for unnecessary medication administration and unwarranted side effects. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R28's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease (PVD- slow and progressive circulation disorder causing narrowing, blockage, or spasms in a blood vessel), hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and diabetes mellitus (DM-when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to consistently administer Resident (R)28's prescribed insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) and metoprolol (a class of medication used to treat high blood pressure) medications This practice placed R28 at risk for unnecessary medication administration and unwarranted side effects. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R28's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease (PVD- slow and progressive circulation disorder causing narrowing, blockage, or spasms in a blood vessel), hypertension (high blood pressure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident sampled for food. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure facility staff accommodated Resident (R) 8's food allergies and food choices. This deficient practice had the potential for adverse food reactions and negative outcomes. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R8 documented diagnosis of hypertension (HTN- elevated blood pressure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 07/29/23 for R8 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. R8 required substantial/maximal to dependent assistance with functional abilities. The Quarterly MDS dated 10/29/23 for R8 documented a BIMS score of 15 which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 51 residents. The sample included 14 residents with five residents reviewed for indwelling catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 100, R36, R200 and R30 had a valid, physician ordered indication for the continued use of an indwelling catheter.This deficient practice placed the residents at increased risk for catheter related complications including urinary tract infection and urinary incontinence. Findings included: - R100's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of chronic kidney disease (damaged kidneys and unable to filter blood the way they should). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] was not completed. R100's Care Area Assessment (CAA) was not completed. R100's Baseline Care Plan lacked reference to the indwelling catheter. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 51 residents. The sample included 14 residents with seven residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 100, R200 and R36's urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) drainage bag was placed in a privacy bag. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for negative psychosocial outcomes, and decreased dignity. Findings included: - On 06/27/22 at 12:40 PM R100's catheter bag, which lacked a privacy cover, was attached to the frame at the foot of the bed and bed and visible from the hall. [NAME] colored urine was visible in the bag from the hallway. 06/27/22 at 12:50 PM R200 wandered around the dining room, hallways, and main entry area. R200's catheter urine collection bag, which lacked a privacy bag, was visible on his right thigh. Yellow urine was visible in the catheter bag. On 06/27/22 at 03:46 PM R36's catheter urine collection bag, which lacked a privacy cover,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 51. The sample included 14 residents with four reviewed for accidents. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents or hazard related injuries for Resident (R)200. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for preventable falls and injuries. Findings Included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R200's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH- non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency and urinary tract infections), type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), retention of urine (lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder), muscle weakness, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), Crohn's disease (chronic inflammation of the bowel), and cellulitis (skin infection caused by bacteria characterized by heat, redness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 51. The sample included 14 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the parameters for Resident (R)48's blood pressure medication and failed to follow parameters for 200's insulin (hormone which regulates blood sugar) administration. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for ineffective treatment and complications related to medication. Findings included; -The Medical Diagnosis section within R200's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH- non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency and urinary tract infections), type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), retention of urine (lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder), muscle weakness, dementia (progressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 51. The sample included 14 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility also failed to provide correct diagnosis for antipsychotic medication (class of medications used to treat psychosis [any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing]) for Resident (R)14. The facility failed to complete abnormal involuntary movement scale (AIMS) testing for R33's psychotropic medication (medication that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior). This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for ineffective treatment and unnecessary side effects related to psychotropic drugs. Findings Included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R14's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 51 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that proper hand hygiene was followed during wound care for Resident (R) 19, and catheter care for R100. The facility failed to ensure R200's catheter tubing did not touch communal surfaces. These deficient practices put the affected residents at risk for the spread of infection and/or communicable diseases. Findings included: - On 06/29/22 at 09:39 AM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M and Licensed Nurse (LN) I donned a gown and pulled gloves from their pockets; they donned the gloves to enter R100's room. The staff knocked on the door and entered the room. CNA M explained to R100 that nursing staff was there to provide catheter care. LN I closed the room door and CNA M lowered the window blinds. CNA M pulled the blankets down to the foot of the bed, LN I and CNA M untaped R100s brief; LN I handed CNA M an open alcohol wipe. CNA M wiped the catheter tubing only where the drainage bag and catheter connected. CNA M stated R100's incontinence brief was wet, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$23,454 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $13,800 — penalty dated 2026-01-27
  • $9,654 — penalty dated 2023-12-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES — 30 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 29 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Colby Operator, LLCColby, KS 1 of 5Dickson Health And RehabDickson, TN 1 of 5Hutchinson Operator, LLCHutchinson, KS 1 of 5Kaw River Care And RehabEdwardsville, KS 1 of 5Lincoln Care And RehabWichita, KS 1 of 5North Ridge Health And RehabNew Hope, MN 1 of 5Providence Living CenterTopeka, KS 2 of 5Columbus Health and RehabColumbus, WI 2 of 5Edwardsville Care And RehabEdwardsville, KS 2 of 5El Dorado Care And RehabEl Dorado, KS 2 of 5Spring Hill Care And RehabSpring Hill, KS 3 of 5Chase County Care And RehabCottonwood Falls, KS 3 of 5Eskridge Care And RehabEskridge, KS 3 of 5McPherson Operator, LLCMcPherson, KS 3 of 5Neodesha Care And RehabNeodesha, KS 3 of 5Parkway Operator LLCEdwardsville, KS 3 of 5Pittsburg Care And RehabPittsburg, KS 3 of 5Rolling Hills Health And RehabWichita, KS 3 of 5Wilson Care And RehabWilson, KS 4 of 5Arma Operator, LLCArma, KS 4 of 5Onaga Operator, LLCOnaga, KS 4 of 5Oswego Operator, LLCOswego, KS 4 of 5Peabody Health And RehabPeabody, KS 4 of 5Pratt Health And RehabPratt, KS 4 of 5Smith Center Health And RehabSmith Center, KS 4 of 5Wakefield Care And RehabWakefield, KS 5 of 5Botkin Care And RehabWellington, KS 5 of 5Downs Care And RehabDowns, KS 5 of 5Wellington Health And RehabWellington, KS

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CORONADO OPERATOR, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/01/2019
BARRES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2019
CURIS HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2019
T AND C CAPITAL ASSETS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2019
WINDWARD HEALTH PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2019
BARNES, MICHELLEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/19/2024
YOAKUM, JAMIEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/19/2024
LANSING OPERATOR LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2019
MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2019
LINDEMAN, STUARTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2019
ROYER, CARLAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2019
THOMAS, TINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+10.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$323K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 6%Other / private 16%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $323K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$290per resident / day
operating cost
$8,806per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$324per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175228. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next