No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Providence Living Center

1112 SE Republican Avenue, Topeka, KS 66607 · For profit - Corporation · 78 certified beds · (785) 233-0588 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Jun 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$22,925 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $22,925 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-10)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2211 SE 29th St · (785) 266-3240 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
121 SE 6th Ave · (877) 232-4601 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
El Rodeo0.6 mi
1706 SE 6th Ave · (785) 267-5407 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1400 SE Locust St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1244 SE Republican Ave · (785) 233-9545

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.8%17.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.7%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.5%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.6%2.9%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms16.7%6.5%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%4.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.2%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication53.1%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.4%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.0%22.6%21.2%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.801.801.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.322.131.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.40
RN hours/ resident / day
0.49
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.57
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.46
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
71.0%
Total nursing turnover
85.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 68.0 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.57 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.58 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

21
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-18)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident (R) 1, who took medications to prevent alcohol relapses and was at risk for self-harm, to prevent an elopement and the staff did not identify the resident was missing for over nine hours. On 06/14/2026 at approximately 04:18 AM staff observed R1 wandering in the facility and this was the last time staff knew R1's whereabouts. On 06/14/2026 at approximately 02:00 PM, staff identified R1 was not in her room, and it appeared she had not been there all day. During the time R1 was out of the facility, without staff knowledge or supervision, there were severe thunderstorm warnings, flash flood warnings, and the temperatures ranged from a low of 55 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to highs of 81 degrees F. The facility's failure to monitor R1 to prevent elopement and self-harming behaviors placed R1 in immediate jeopardy. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 69 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured and inaccessible to residents. On 02/11/26 at 07:55 PM, the pharmacy delivered three bags of medications to the facility, which included one white bag, one blue bag, and one red bag. The red bag contained 90 tablets (tabs) of alprazolam (a medication used to treat anxiety, panic disorders, and depression) and 90 tabs of lorazepam (a medication used to treat anxiety, insomnia, and seizure disorders). Licensed Nurse (LN) G took possession of the medications and left them in the nurse's station without securing them. At 09:55 PM, Resident (R) 1 and R2 identified the nurse's station was unmanned. R2 went into the unsupervised, unsecured area, obtained some drinking cups, and at the request of R1 took the red bag of medications. R2 then gave the bag of medications to R1. R1 took the pills back to his room and at an unknown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2024-02-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 76 residents. The sample included 18 residents with four reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement Registered Dietician (RD) interventions for Resident (R) 27's significant weight loss, resulting in a 12.61 % loss over three months. This also placed the resident at risk for continued weight loss. Findings Included: - R27's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R27 had diagnoses of chronic pain syndrome, congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) without residual deficits, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), schizoaffective disorder (mental disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. Findings included:- On 06/16/2026 at 02:30 PM, observation revealed the sidewalk that leads away from the patio right outside of the back doors from the dining room area had a four-foot-long by three inches wide gap in the sidewalk that dropped in depth, causing an uneven walking surface area on the sidewalk. Then approximately 16 feet down the sidewalk, going towards the back of the courtyard, there was a patched area to the sidewalk, approximately one foot wide by three feet long, with uneven cracks surrounding the outside of the patch that ranged from one inch in width to approximately six inches in width. Proceeding towards the back of the courtyard, approximately five feet further, there was another misshapen patch with cracks around the outside noted to be uneven with approximately a half an inch in depth, ranging from one inch to six inches in length. Proceeding from there, another 14 feet, another…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify an elopement that went undiscovered by staff for over eight hours as an allegation of neglect and report it to the State Agency (SA) as required. (Refer to F689) Findings included:- Resident (R)1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD- mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress), and borderline personality disorder (disorder characterized by disturbed and unstable interpersonal relationships and self-image along with impulsive, reckless, and often self-destructive behavior). R1's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 09/23/2025 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. R1's MDS documented inattentive, disorganized thinking, and altered level of consciousness behaviors were present but fluctuated (comes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing levels on the weekends to meet the needs of the residents. Findings included: - A review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Quarter 1, FY 2025 Quarter 2, FY 2025 Quarter 3, and FY 2025 Quarter 4 revealed the facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing. Review of the Facility Assessment dated 01/01/25 documented the specific needs of each resident would be identified and adjusted as necessary. This included staffing needs for each shift, such as day, evening, night, and weekend. Day shift staffing would include two nurse shifts, four Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) shifts, and two Certified Medication Aide (CMA) shifts (eight total staff). Night shift would include two nurse shifts, two CNA shifts, and two CMA shifts (six total staff). The assessment documented there would be no change in staffing patterns during weekend and/or holiday…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 67 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the services of a full-time certified dietary manager for the residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the kitchen. Findings included:- On 12/15/25 at 12:35 PM, observation revealed Dietary Staff BB cleaning up the kitchen after meal service. On 12/16/25 at 11:30 AM, Dietary Staff BB stated she had recently completed a certified dietary management course and would be scheduling her test soon. Dietary Staff BB was unable to provide proof of completion of the course upon request. On 12/18/25 at 01:35 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility should have a certified dietary manager. Administrative Staff A verified she was unable to provide proof of Dietary Staff BB's completion of the Dietary Management course, certification, or evidence Dietary Staff BB had the required experience for the position. The facility's Food Service Staffing policy, dated 10/2023, stated a Food Services Manager would oversee the production, storage,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 67 residents, and one kitchen. Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions to prevent the potential for food-borne bacteria. Findings included:- Observation of the kitchen and food storage areas on 12/15/25 at 09:46 AM with Dietary BB, revealed the following areas of concern:The bottom shelf of the heat table was visibly dirty with caked-on grease.There were empty boxes (not broken down) stacked in the large trash can, near the handwashing sink. The boxes and a wire rack were on the step-to-open trash can, next to the handwashing sink, making it inaccessible. Several different buckets of two types of dishwasher sanitizer were under the dishwasher area, grey and brown dirt built up against the baseboards of the wall, and visible rust on pipes under the dishwasher. There was a large plastic dishwashing pan on the floor in the back sink area under an unused triple-basin sink to catch leaking water, as well as warm water on the floor in the area. The triple-basin sink had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-18 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 67 residents; the sample included 17 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director ( or designee) attended Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings at least quarterly.Findings included:-Review of the facility's QAPI attendance binder noted the following: Upon request, the facility was unable to provide evidence of the quarterly attendance of the Medical Director (or designee) completed within the last year. During an interview on 12/18/25 at 01:53 PM, Administrative Staff A reported the quarterly attendance signature sheets lacked detailed signatures, which indicated the Medical Director attended the QAPI meetings only twice in the 12-month look-back period. Administrative Staff A reported he expected the Medical Director to be in attendance quarterly. The facility's policy Providence QAPI Plan 2025, dated 01/01/24, documented the QAPI Committee reports to the Governing Body and meets monthly, or at additional times when deemed necessary. The Administrator may delegate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-18 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 67 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the staff member designated as the Infection Preventionist (IP), who was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program, completed the specialized training in infection prevention and control and possessed the required certification. Findings included:- The Department Heads form completed by the facility on 12/15/25 listed Administrative Nurse E as the designated IP. Upon request, the facility could not provide documentation of a certification for the designated IP. On 12/18/25 at 07:57 AM, Administrative Nurse E confirmed she was the designated IP but was not currently certified. She stated she shared some of the duties with Administrative Nurse D, but she was not sure if Administrative Nurse D was certified. The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program F 880 policy, revised 01/2024, stated the IP would report monthly to the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 67 residents. Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain the building in good condition and provide a safe and hazard free environment for the residents, visitors and staff. Findings included:- On 12/15/2025 at 11:00 AM, observation revealed the sidewalk was cracked in several areas and uneven in the courtyard that connected the north and south sides of the facility. The sidewalk that connected the east and west sides of the facility courtyard was missing a large piece of concrete and was uneven. On 12/15/25 at 11:13 AM in the north hallway, observation revealed a large hole in the ceiling; the tiles surrounding the large hole were discolored brown. There was pink insulation that was discolored black in some areas; the discolored insulation hung from the large hole. During an observation on 12/16/2025 at 11:20 AM, the clean laundry room area had a barrel in the doorway. Further observation of the ceiling above the barrel revealed an unintended…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, sanitary and homelike environment in the facility. Findings included: - During a walkthrough of the facility on 12/18/25 at 05:30 AM, the combined dining and common area floor was dirty and had several areas of spilled popcorn and empty soda cans. Several tables had food containers and various spilled liquids, and on the floor as well, where no residents were seated. No staff members were present in the combined dining and common room. During an observation on 12/18/25 at 06:45 AM in the combined dining and common area, the tables were rearranged but had not been cleaned. The litter had been removed, but food debris remained on the floor. During an observation on 12/18/25 at 07:05 AM in the combined dining and common area, residents were being served breakfast on tables that still had food debris and spilled liquids. During a walkthrough of the facility on 12/18/25 at 11:30 AM with Maintenance U, the following areas were identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with four residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a written bed hold policy and failed to issue written notification as soon as practicable for transfers for Resident (R) 1, R33 R52 and R70. Additionally, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman for transfers.Findings included1.R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded R1 was transferred to the hospital on 7/14/25, 8/17/25, and 9/14/25. R1's EMR lacked evidence the facility provided a bed hold notice or written notification of the transfer to R1 and/or his representative. Upon request, the facility was unable to provide the documentation. 2. R33's EMR recorded R33 was transferred to the hospital on 7/03/25. R33's EMR lacked evidence the facility provided a bed hold notice or written notification of the transfer to R33 and/or her representative. Upon request, the facility was unable to provide the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 67 residents; the sample included 17 residents sampled with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to acknowledge the Consultant Pharmacist's monthly medication regimen review (MRR) and failed to ensure the MRR recommendations were filed in the clinical record for Resident (R) 1, R7, R9, R13, and R30. Findings included:1. R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded the following Medication Regimen Review (MRR):R1's Pharmacy Consultant Note on 07/21/25 documented MRR completed, irregularities noted, see report. R1's Pharmacy Consultant Note on 10/13/25 documented MRR completed, The Consultant Pharmacist requested a vitamin level, but no results were found until the facility provided lab results dated 12/18/25. R1's Pharmacy Consultant Note on 11/13/25 documented MRR completed, irregularities noted, see report. R1's clinical record lacked the actual recommendations made and lacked evidence the facility and physician acknowledged and responded. 2. R7's EMR recorded the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five residents reviewed for vaccinations. Based on record review nad interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents were offered and received the pneumococcal vaccine or informed declinations for the vaccine were obtained for Resident (R) 13, R5, R6 and R34. Findings included:R13's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a signed declination for the influenza vaccine on 10/03/25. The EMR lacked evidence of administration of the pneumovax and lacked evidence of an informed declination signed by the resident or her representative. R5's EMR recorded the resident received the influenza vaccine on 10/08/25, but refused the pneumovax. The EMR lacked evidence of an informed declination signed by the resident or his representative. R6's EMR recorded the resident received the influenza vaccine on 10/08/25 but refused the pneumovax. The EMR lacked evidence of an informed declination signed by the resident or her representative. R34's EMR recorded the resident received the influenza vaccine on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safely secured handrail in the stairwell corridor leading to the basement. Findings include:- During an observation on 12/15/25 at 12:30 PM, the handrail to the stairwell on the north side of the courtyard was wobbly and not secured. Resident (R) 62 sat at the bottom of the stairway near the secured basement door. During an interview on 12/16/25 at 11:00 AM, Administrative Staff A observed the loose, wobbly handrail in the stairwell corridor leading to the basement and reported he had not been aware of the loose handrail. Administrative Staff A moved the railing, observed the base was out of the hole in the concrete, and reported it would need to be fixed. The facility policy Other Environmental Conditions dated 10/2025 documented the facility must provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. Equip corridors with firmly secured handrails on each side.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 67 residents, the sample included 17 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform Resident (R) 1 and R13 and/or their representative regarding the risks related to psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medications. Findings included: - Review of both Electronic Health Record (EHR) and paper records revealed the following:1.R1's EHR under the Orders tab revealed orders for the following:Fluphenazine HCl (an antipsychotic [a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality] medication), five milligrams (mg) to be given orally two times daily for schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought), dated 11/19/25.Mirtazapine (antidepressant medication used to treat mood disorders), 15 mg to be given orally at bedtime for depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), dated 11/15/25.Lorazepam (an antianxiety [a class of medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with one resident reviewed for advanced directives. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to accurately identify Resident (R) 30's advanced directives for a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR- expressed desire to not receive cardiopulmonary resuscitative measures in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest). Findings included:- R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness). R30's Significant Change Minimum Data Set [MDS] dated 11/10/25 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R30 received hospice (palliative) care. R30's Care Plan dated 09/19/18 documented she wished to have a DNR. R30's EMR under the MISC tab revealed an outside-of-hospital DNR signed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with one resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to offer and provide assistance with nail care for Resident (R) 9, who participated in her hygiene activities but needed staff assistance. Findings included:- R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and a need for assistance with personal care. R9's 07/22/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R9 required moderate assistance with bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene. R9's 08/05/25 Functional Abilities (Self-Care and Mobility) Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R9 was at risk for falls. The plan of care would be reviewed and revised to ensure proper interventions were in place to prevent falls.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 67 residents; the sample included 17 with one resident reviewed for prevent decrease in range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension) and mobility. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a palm guard to prevent contractures (abnormal fixation of a joint or muscle) to Resident (R) 44. Findings included:- R44's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses including acute cerebrovascular insufficiency (CVI- a sudden, temporary lack of blood flow to part or all of the brain, often due to blocked arteries or low blood pressure), and osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain) R44's 11/25/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 99, which indicated severely impaired cognition. R44's MDS recorded impairment to both sides of her upper and lower extremities. The MDS recorded R44 required total dependence on staff for all activities of daily living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with one resident reviewed for smoking. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from accident hazards for Resident (R) 33 when staff failed to assess R33 for safe smoking ability and determine if safety equipment was required. Findings included:- R33's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress), bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), and schizoaffective (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought) R33's 12/20/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. R33's MDS documented she had no behaviors and no depression.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to apply, clean, and store a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP- ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep the airway open during sleep) within the standards of practice for Resident (R) 3.Findings included:- R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and sleep apnea (a disorder of sleep characterized by periods without respirations). R3's 08/16/25 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not completed as the resident was rarely/never understood, indicating severely impaired cognition. R3's MDS documented R3 used oxygen therapy and a non-invasive mechanical ventilator (CPAP). R3's 08/28/25 Cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 67 residents; the sample included 17 residents with one resident reviewed for trauma. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement approaches for trauma informed care to prevent triggers that were identified for Resident (R) 33, who had a history of personal trauma.Findings included:- R33's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress), bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), and schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought) R33's 12/20/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. R33's MDS documented no behaviors and no depression. R33's 01/03/25 Psychotropic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with two residents reviewed for bed rail safety. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to assess Resident (R)1 and R29 for safe use and necessity of the bed rails. The facility further failed to obtain and document that risks of bed rail use were explained and informed consent from the resident and/or representative was obtained. Findings include:- 1. Review of R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses that included morbid obesity (excessive body fat) and schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought), R1's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. R1 utilized a wheelchair for locomotion, required substantial/maximal assistance for rolling left to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 67 residents. The sample included 17 residents with two residents reviewed for bed rail safety. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to inspect the bed rails to ensure correct and secure installation on the beds for Resident (R)1 and R29. Findings include: - Upon request for a record or log of the regular maintenance inspections of the bed rails, the facility provided the Assessment history Nursing: Side Rail Evaluation-V5 with a date range of 12/01/24 through 12/22/25. The document did not list any assessments for R1 or R29 prior to the survey event. The facility was unable to provide any evidence of regular maintenance inspections of the bed rails for R1 or R29 upon request. During an observation on 12/15/25 at 01:37 PM, R1's bed had a quarter-length bed rail attached to both sides of the bed. R1 was able to move the bed rail side-to-side with minimal effort. During an observation on 12/16/25 at 08:20 AM, R29 rested in bed with an eighth-length bed rail attached to one side of the bed frame. During a walk-through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 72 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff monitored and reported lab results to the provider as they became available in order to treat Resident (R) 1's urinary tract infection (UTI). This placed the resident at risk of ongoing pain with urination, agitation, and confusion related to delayed treatment of a UTI. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure) and diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin).R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS noted the resident required substantial assistance with oral hygiene, personal hygiene, and dressing. The resident was dependent on staff assistance for toileting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 72. The sample included three residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow physician-ordered parameters regarding medication monitoring for Resident (R) 1. This placed the resident at risk for medication-related complications and adverse effects.Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure) and diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin).R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS noted the resident required substantial assistance with oral hygiene, personal hygiene and dressing. The resident was dependent on staff assistance for toileting and bathing.R1's Care Plan initiated on 09/13/21 and revised on 01/30/24 documented the resident had hypertension and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 76 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the services of a full-time certified dietary manager for the residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the kitchen, placing the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 02/07/24 at 09:30 AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff BB overseeing staff cleaning up the kitchen after meal service. On 02/07/24 at 09:30 AM, Dietary Staff BB verified she had not completed a certified dietary management course and was currently taking those classes. On 02/13/24 at 10:07 AM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility should employ a certified dietary manager. The facility's Food Service Staffing policy, dated 10/2023, stated a Food Services Manager would oversee the production, storage, and delivery of food. If the dietician is not full-time, the facility would employ a nutritional professional to serve as the dietary manager. The person must meet one of the following qualifications: Certified dietary manager,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-13 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 71 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information to the federal regulatory agency through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ) when the facility failed to submit staffing hour data for all direct care personnel as required. This placed the residents at risk for impaired care due to unidentified staffing issues. Findings included: - The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Quarter 1 indicated data was suppressed though the facility did not meet the reasons for suppressed data other than inaccurate data or failure to report. On 02/08/24 at 01:58 PM, Administrative Staff A verified the lack of PBJ reporting due to a change of staff responsible for the reporting. Administrative Staff A stated that the facility changed its system so reporting would meet submission criteria. The facility's Payroll-Based Journal policy, dated 09/2023, documented the community will submit payroll data in a uniform format to CMS, including staffing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 76 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan with effective person-centered interventions for two residents. Resident (R) 65 to include interventions related to bolus feeding by gastrostomy tube (G-tube: a tube for introducing high-calorie fluids into the stomach and R72 who had posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD- mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress) with no person-centered interventions to address the PTSD. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R65 's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 76 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess gastric (stomach) contents before administering bolus feeding by gastrostomy tube (G-tube: a tube for introducing high-calorie fluids into the stomach) for Resident (R) 65. This deficient practice placed R65 at risk for aspiration (inhaling liquid or food into the lungs) and inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - R65's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), and muscle wasting from calorie loss due to dysphagia and movement disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R65 had intact cognition. The MDS documented R65 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living including nutrition. The MDS documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-13 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 76 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 72 received trauma-informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization related to a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress). This placed the resident at risk for unmet mental health care needs. Findings included: - R76's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought), opioid (medication used to treat pain) dependence, PTSD, and other stimulant abuse. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R72 had intact cognition, hallucinations (sensing things while awake that appear to be real,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 76 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for Hospice services (a type of health care that focuses on the terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms and attending to their emotional and spiritual needs at the end of life). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)52 received hospice services as agreed in the hospice plan of care. This placed R52 at risk for inappropriate end-of-life care. Findings included: - R52 's Electronic Medical Record documented diagnoses of vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain), anxiety disorder, and high blood pressure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R52 required staff assistance with all activities of daily living and received hospice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 72 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the 72 residents who resided in the facility and received their food from the facility kitchen, when the facility failed to ensure clean and sanitary food prep areas, and failed to sanitize a thermometer prior to checking temperatures of different food items. This placed the 72 residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 08/08/22 at 11:30 AM, observation in the kitchen revealed the following: The floor fan had gray fuzzy particles on the blades and the outer screen. A ceiling vent located between the oven and the prep area counter had gray fuzzy particles. A ceiling vent located by the entrance door to the kitchen had a piece of gray duct tape approximately 2-3 inches long and 2 inches wide hanging with gray fuzzy particles. On 08/08/22 at 11:30 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) BB verified the above issues in the kitchen. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 72 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility's consultant pharmacist failed to notify the Director of Nursing (DON), medical director, or physician of recommendations for a 14 day stop date or physician's rationale for extended use on as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications (medications used to treat mental illness, moods, behaviors) for two sampled residents, Resident (R) 1, R42, and a 14 day stop date for a PRN antipsychotic medication (class of medications used to treat psychosis and other significant mental conditions) for R45. This placed the residents at risk for unnecessary psychotropic medications and adverse side effects. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet, dated 08/01/22, recorded R1 had diagnoses of schizophrenia (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, fragmentation of thought and impaired communication), borderline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 72 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a 14 day stop date or physician's rationale for extended use for PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication (medications that affect a person's mental state) for two sampled residents, Residents (R) 1, and R42, and a 14 day stop date for a PRN antipsychotic medication (class of medications used to treat psychosis and other significant mental conditions) for R45. This placed the residents at risk for unnecessary psychotropic medications and adverse medication side effects. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet, dated 08/01/22, recorded R1 had diagnoses of schizophrenia (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, fragmentation of thought and impaired communication), borderline personality disorder (disorder characterized by disturbed and unstable interpersonal relationships along with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-10 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 72 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five reviewed for accidents/falls. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide occupational therapy (OT) and physical therapy (PT) services as ordered by the physician to prevent falls for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 38. This placed the resident at risk for continued falls with injuries. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet, dated 08/02/22, recorded R38 had diagnoses of psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing), schizophrenia (psychotic disorder characterized by a gross distortion of reality, fragmentation of thought and impaired communication), depression (mental health disorder characterized by persistent depressed mood, causing impairment of daily life), delusions (untrue persistent beliefs or perceptions held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue), anxiety (mental health disorder characterized by worry and fear…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-12-18 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 67 residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and / or dispose of kitchen garbage and refuse properly. Findings included: -During a tour of the kitchen on 12/16/25 at 10:10 AM, observation revealed the outside garbage receptacle had one lid open. On 12/17/25 at 05:10 PM, observation revealed two of the lids on the trash receptacle were left open. Two female staff members were observed rolling a large, uncovered trash can through the parking lot, toward the garbage receptacle in the corner of the lot. During an interview on 12/16/25 at 1020 AM, Dietary Staff BB reported that all lids to outdoor trash receptacles were to be closed. The facility's policy Food-Related Garbage and Rubbish Disposal F814, last approved 10/2025, states outside dumpsters provided by garbage pick up services will be kept closed, and free of surrounding litter, garbage containers are covered when removed from the kitchen area to the dumpster.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$22,925 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $22,925 — penalty dated 2026-03-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES — 30 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 29 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Colby Operator, LLCColby, KS 1 of 5Dickson Health And RehabDickson, TN 1 of 5Hutchinson Operator, LLCHutchinson, KS 1 of 5Kaw River Care And RehabEdwardsville, KS 1 of 5Lincoln Care And RehabWichita, KS 1 of 5North Ridge Health And RehabNew Hope, MN 2 of 5Columbus Health and RehabColumbus, WI 2 of 5Edwardsville Care And RehabEdwardsville, KS 2 of 5El Dorado Care And RehabEl Dorado, KS 2 of 5Spring Hill Care And RehabSpring Hill, KS 3 of 5Chase County Care And RehabCottonwood Falls, KS 3 of 5Eskridge Care And RehabEskridge, KS 3 of 5Lansing Care And RehabLansing, KS 3 of 5McPherson Operator, LLCMcPherson, KS 3 of 5Neodesha Care And RehabNeodesha, KS 3 of 5Parkway Operator LLCEdwardsville, KS 3 of 5Pittsburg Care And RehabPittsburg, KS 3 of 5Rolling Hills Health And RehabWichita, KS 3 of 5Wilson Care And RehabWilson, KS 4 of 5Arma Operator, LLCArma, KS 4 of 5Onaga Operator, LLCOnaga, KS 4 of 5Oswego Operator, LLCOswego, KS 4 of 5Peabody Health And RehabPeabody, KS 4 of 5Pratt Health And RehabPratt, KS 4 of 5Smith Center Health And RehabSmith Center, KS 4 of 5Wakefield Care And RehabWakefield, KS 5 of 5Botkin Care And RehabWellington, KS 5 of 5Downs Care And RehabDowns, KS 5 of 5Wellington Health And RehabWellington, KS

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CURIS HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 02/01/2024
BARRES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2024
WINDWARD HEALTH PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2024
CRINO, BRYANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2024
FEUER, SCOTTIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2024
LINDEMAN, STUARTIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2024
HESTON, TIMOTHYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/01/2024
MEMMER, MATTHEWIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 96%Medicare 2%Other / private 2%

About 96% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$203per resident / day
operating cost
$6,180per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$205per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175418. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next