No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Chase County Care And Rehab

612 Walnut, Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 45 certified beds · (620) 273-6360 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (620) 273-6360 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0606) — most recent Jun 2024
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0606) — most recent Jun 2024
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1301 W 12th Ave Ste 101 · (620) 343-2500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
211 Broadway St · (620) 220-6161 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4700 W US-50, Ste A · (800) 658-1652 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1998 KS Highway 177 · (316) 452-1715

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.2%17.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.0%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.0%6.5%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%4.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.6%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.6%23.2%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.5%22.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.1%18.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication11.1%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.0%73.8%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.941.801.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.012.131.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 6.8–17.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.421.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.68
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.46
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.73
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
50.0%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 30.9 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-11)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food in one of one kitchen under sanitary conditions. This deficient practice placed the residents of the facility at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings included:- On 09/09/25 at 01:15 PM, during a kitchen tour with Dietary Staff BB, observation revealed the following sanitation concerns in the food preparation and storage area:A stainless-steel food preparation table countertop with rust and peeling paint adjacent to the surface Missing trim/door facing on one side of the kitchen door when exiting the dry food storage room, which exposed an unsealed sheetrock surfaceFour broken floor tiles in the dry food storage areaDietary Staff BB confirmed the finding and agreed the surface needed maintenance and was not sanitizable.The facility policy Sanitation F812, dated 09/25, documentation included the food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. Utensils, counters, shelves, and equipment shall be kept clean, maintained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 35 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on interviews, record reviews and observation, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment in all areas of the facility including those used by visitors and staff. This deficient practice created a risk for impaired safety and cleanliness. Findings included:- Observed on 09/11/25 at 08:30 AM, in the hall one clean utility closet, where clean linen was being stored, there was torn and missing wallpaper on the end of the storage shelf with exposed wood. The fluorescent light cover had a missing piece that exposed the fluorescent bulbs.Observed on 09/11/25 at 08:57 AM, the hall two clean utility closet, storing the clean linen, had numerous holes in the walls with exposed and flaking sheetrock, and the fluorescent light cover was cracked and had a broken area.Observed on 09/11/25 at 09:10 AM, the ceiling in the clean linen storage and folding area had numerous areas with cracks and flaking paint, the attic access door had missed paint, and the framing around the access door had exposed wood;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 35 residents; the sample included 13 residents. Based on interviews, record review and observation, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean home-like environment in the resident's rooms. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for safety and decreased comfort. Findings included:- During an observation on 09/09/25 at 10:32 AM, the ceiling in Resident (R) 1's room, next to the fluorescent room light, had an approximately five-inch area of paint peeling, and there was a large water stain around the peeled area.During an observation on 09/09/25 at 11:05 AM, R2's room had a large area of wall, next to the bed, scuffed with paint rubbed off. The end of the fluorescent ceiling light had the metal cover bent out with exposed wires, and the wall behind the television had multiple areas of paint chipped off. R2's bathroom door also had multiple areas scraped on the bottom, and there were several holes in the door.Observed on 09/09/25 at 11:48 AM, R5's room had multiple areas on the walls with paint missing, exposing the sheetrock; there were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 35 residents. There were 13 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to review and revise the care plans for Resident (R) 16 regarding non-pharmacological interventions for pain, placing the resident at risk for unrelieved pain due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included:- R16's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of pain.R16's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The resident had scheduled pain medications with no non-pharmacologic pain interventions attempted. The resident reported her pain in the past five days was seven on a one to 10 pain scale, with 10 being the worst pain imaginable. She reported the pain frequently occasionally affected her sleep and day-to-day activities. She received opioid (a type of drug that is used to treat moderate to severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 35 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on interviews, record reviews and observation, the facility staff failed to implement adequate and acceptable infection control practices for Resident (R) 38 and R4 with regard to urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag) tubing and drainage bags resting on the floor. The facility failed to ensure staff implemented proper Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) personal protective equipment (PPE) with cares. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for infections. Findings included:- Observed on 09/09/25 at 12:04 PM, R38's urinary catheter dignity bag was resting on the floor while attached to the foot of his bed. EBP PPE and signage were present on R38's room door, and the signage indicated gloves and gown PPE were to be utilized for all cares.Observed on 09/10/25 08:38 AM, R38's urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — pattern
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 33 residents with four residents selected for review. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct reference checks for five of five employees reviewed to ensure no abuse to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Review of the following personnel files for the following staff hired within the past year from 06/26/23 to 06/26/24, revealed lack of documentation for reference checks for the following staff: 1. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M with hire date of 02/08/24. 2. CNA N with a hire date of 02/026/24. 3. CNA O with a hire date of 11/2023. 4. CNA P with a hire date of 03/27/24. 5. Housekeeping staff U with a hire date of 05/21/24. Interview, on 06/26/24 at 03:30 PM, with Administrative Staff A, confirmed lack of documentation that reference checks were completed. The facility policy Abuse Prevention Program, Screening of Employees reviewed 09/2023, instructed staff pre-employment screening to consist of at a minimum employment history, information from former employers as available and documentation of status and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-01 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review at least once every 12 months for five of the five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) reviewed, CNA M, N, O, P and Q, to ensure adequate appropriate cares and services provided to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Review of five employee personnel files, employed by the facility for greater than one year, revealed the following concerns: Review of Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M, hired 03/08/22, lacked an annual performance review in her personnel file. Review of CNA Q, hired 11/21/22, lacked an annual performance review in her personnel file. Review of CNA N, hired 02/01/22, lacked an annual performance review in her personnel file. Review of CNA, O, hired 09/19/22, lacked an annual performance review in her personnel file. Review of CNA P, hired 07/13/22, lacked an annual performance review in his personnel file. On 01/31/24 at 09:12 AM, Administrative Staff A stated the annual evaluations were not up to date. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the facility appropriately to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria. Findings included: - During an initial tour of the kitchen on 01/30/24 at 03:15 PM, the following areas of concern were noted: 1. A three-tiered beige rolling cart used to transport food from the walk-in refrigerator to the kitchen area and to deliver meals to residents in their rooms had visible ground-in dirt on all three tiers. 2. A three-tiered plastic rolling cart used to transport food from the walk-in refrigerator to the kitchen area and to deliver meals to residents in their rooms had visible ground-in dirt on the handles used to push the cart. 3. Two buckets with water and chemicals used to clean the dining room tables and work surfaces in the kitchen had the chemical dispensing hose left directly inside of the bucket beneath the water level. 4. A wire shelf used to hold clean dishes had a build-up of dust and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-01 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) with complete and accurate direct staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS (i.e. Payroll Base Journal (PBJ), related to licensed nursing staffing information, when the facility failed to accurately report 24 hour per day Licensed Nurse coverage on 24 dates between 01/01/23 and 12/31/23. Findings Included: - Review of the Payroll Base Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for fiscal year (FY), Quarter 1 2023 (October 1-December 31) revealed a lack of License Nurse (LN) for 24 hours/seven days a week 24 hour/day on the following dates: On 10/02, Sunday (SU), On 10/09, SU, On 11/12, Saturday (SA), On 11/24, Thursday (TH), On 11/26, SA, On 12/06, Tuesday (TU), On 12/24, SA, Review of the PBJ for FY, Quarter 2, 2023 (January 1-March 31), the following infraction dates the facility failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program that would ensure infection surveillance for infections and determine the causative organism when cultured to prevent the spread of infections amongst the residents. Findings included: - Review of the Infection Control logs, revealed the lack of clinical data collection which included lack of causative organisms for infections of cultured infections to determine trends in types of infections and prevalence in the facility. This included the logs for the following months in 2023: February, March, April, June, July, August, September, October, and November. Interview, on 01/30/24 at 03:41 PM, with Administrative Nurse F, revealed she utilized the antibiotic report generated from their providing pharmacy. Administrative Nurse F stated she reviewed new orders daily, and documents those on the log. Interview, on 01/30/24 at 03:34 PM, with Administrative Nurse D, revealed the previous Infection Preventionist did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The resident reported a census of 32 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment in the kitchen for residents and staff. Findings included: - During the initial tour of the kitchen on 01/30/24 at 03:15 PM, the following area of concern was noted: The floor throughout the kitchen had areas which contained a build-up of dirt. The parameter of the floor had a heavy build-up of dirt and grime. The floor where table legs stood had a build-up of grime. On 02/01/24 at 10:09 AM, Dietary Staff BB, confirmed the kitchen floor needed to be kept clean at all times. The facility policy for Sanitation, effective 10/2023, included: Utensils, counters, shelves and equipment shall be kept clean, maintained in good repair and shall be free from breaks, corrosions, open seams, cracks and chipped areas that may affect their use or proper cleaning. The facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents and staff.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment on one of three resident hallways of the facility. Findings included: - During an environmental tour on 02/01/24 at 10:27 AM with Consultant Staff GG, the following areas of concern were noted: 1. One resident room had a hole through the sheetrock wall which measured approximately 11 by two inches. The floor of the room had a build-up of visible dirt and grime around the parameter of the room. The shelf in the bathroom over the sink had worn, missing paint and the sink of the bathroom had a large blackened area on the front where the porcelain had worn away. 2. One resident room had broken wood and missing, chipped paint on one closet door. The TV stand had various areas of chipped, missing paint. A seat riser over the bathroom toilet had a large amount of a dried, brownish substance. 3. One wall in a resident room had an area of missing paint approximately eight by three inches, above the TV. The tile…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 32 residents with 15 selected for review which included three residents reviewed for transfer to hospital. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a Bed Hold (a document that indicates a resident's desire to keep their bed available and indicates financial implications if any apply) as required for one Resident (R)13 of the three residents reviewed for transfer to a hospital. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)13's Physician Order Sheet dated 01/05/24, revealed diagnoses that included myasthenia gravis (abnormal condition that caused muscles to tire and weaken easily). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The ADL (Activity of Daily Living) Functional/Rehabilitation Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 12/27/23, assessed the resident experienced an exacerbation of myasthenia gravis, and upon return to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 32 residents with 15 residents sampled. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Sets (MDS) for two Residents (R)3, regarding documentation for falls and R 33, regarding discharge. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)33's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of a spinal injury (physical damage to the spinal cord which interfere with normal motor, sensory or autonomic function). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident admitted to the facility from an acute hospital. The Discharge MDS, dated 12/08/23, documented the resident discharged to an acute hospital and his return was not anticipated. Review of the resident's EMR revealed the resident had received a physician's order 12/01/23 to discharge to home with home health. Review of the resident's EMR revealed a Discharge Assessment, dated 12/06/23, which documented the resident was to discharge home. On 02/01/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 32 residents with 15 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to review and revise the care plans for one sampled Resident (R)3, regarding fall interventions. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)3's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: Schizoaffective disorder (mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought) and muscle weakness. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He had inattentive behavior continuously and impairment in range of motion (ROM) on one side of his lower extremity. He had two or more non-injury falls since his prior assessment (this section of the MDS was inaccurate) and required substantial to maximal staff assistance for transfers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 32 residents with 15 selected for review. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled Resident (R)137 received appropriate treatment to bilateral (both sides) lower extremity cellulitis (skin infection caused by bacteria) and received proper ear care. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)137's medical record revealed diagnosis that included Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurological disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), schizophrenia (mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought), narcolepsy (a chronic neurological disorder that affects the ability to control sleep-wake cycles), and encephalopathy (broad term for any brain disease that alters brain function or structure). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 32 residents with 15 residents sampled, including five residents reviewed for accidents. Based ON observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate an appropriate intervention following one non-injury fall for Resident (R)3, to prevent further falls. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)3's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: Schizoaffective disorder (mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought) and muscle weakness. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He had inattentive behavior continuously and impairment in range of motion (ROM) on one side of his lower extremity. He had two or more non-injury falls since his prior assessment (this section of the MDS was inaccurate) and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 32 residents with 15 selected for review, which included six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely follow-up of the pharmacist's recommendations for two of the six sampled Residents (R)7 and R3. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)7's Physician Order Sheet dated 11/13/23, revealed diagnoses that included dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), hypothyroidism (condition characterized by decreased activity of the thyroid gland) and hyperlipidemia (condition of elevated blood lipid levels). The Care Plan reviewed 11/30/23, instructed staff to review the pharmacy consultant recommendations and to follow-up as indicated. On 08/02/23, the physician instructed staff to administer Depakote (an antiseizure medication with mood altering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 32 residents with a sample of 15 residents, including six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent two residents from unnecessary medications, including Resident (R)19, regarding giving medication outside of parameters and R 7, regarding the pharmacy consultant's recommendation to acquire labs. Findings included: - Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident (R)19, revealed a diagnosis of orthostatic hypotension (blood pressure dropping with change of position). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a diagnosis of orthostatic hypotension (decrease in blood pressure (BP) with movement). The Quarterly MDS, dated 09/23/23, documented the resident had a diagnosis of hypertension (HTN- high blood pressure). The care plan, dated 10/11/23, lacked staff instruction regarding the resident's orthostatic hypotension. Review of the resident's EMR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 30 residents with eight residents selected for review and one resident reviewed for neglect. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility neglected Resident (R)1 when they left him unattended at a clinic during an out of town appointment on 08/29/23. R1 exited the clinic with clinic staff then left the premises around 04:00 PM to 04:30 PM. R1 was later found by facility staff 1.8 miles away from the clinic on 08/29/23 at 06:19 PM. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis tab for R1 included diagnoses of schizophrenia (psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought), acquired absence of right and left leg above knee, bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), history of traumatic brain injury, stimulant use, mild neurocognitive disorder, and need for assistance with personal care. The admission Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program with the failure to clean the nebulizer kit (device which changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) for Resident (R)3 and R4 after use. These practices increased the risk of R3 and R4 for developing a respiratory infection. Findings included: - On 09/06/23 at 09:24 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G entered R3's room to administer his nebulizer treatment. The nebulizer kit was connected and rested directly on top of the nebulizer machine. LN G placed the medication in the nebulizer kit medication cup and handed the kit to the resident. On 09/06/23 at 09:33 AM, LN G entered R4's room to administer his nebulizer treatment. The nebulizer kit mask was hanging off the overbed table approximately a foot above the floor and dated 09/04. An additional nebulizer kit was connected and stored in a bag on the wall with a date of 09/03. While trying to get a hold of the mask hanging off the overbed table, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 30 residents with eight selected for review including five reviewed for Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain immunization status for Resident (R)1 and failed to provide additional immunization to R5. Findings included: - The Minimum Data Set tab for R1 revealed he entered the facility on 05/11/23. The Immunization tab lacked information of R1 receiving the Pneumococcal vaccine. The Miscellaneous tab lacked a consent/declination for the Pneumococcal vaccine for R1. The Resident Vaccination binder lacked a consent/declination for the Pneumococcal vaccine for R1. On 09/06/23 at 01:10 PM, Administrative Nurse E stated the status of the Pneumococcal vaccine should have been addressed on admission. The facility policy Pneumococcal Vaccine dated October 2022 revealed residents will be offered the Pneumococcal vaccine to aid in preventing Pneumococcal infections. Prior to or upon admission, residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the Pneumococcal vaccine, and when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-05-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals in a locked compartment. Findings included: - On 5/25/22 at 01:00 PM, the medication cart observed unlocked. The Licensed Nurse and the Certified Medication Aide were no where available. The surveyor notified nurse consultant staff HH, in an adjoining office, who then went out of the office and to the medication cart and confirmed the medication cart unlocked. She reported staff should always keep the medication cart locked when the staff were not available. The facility policy Administering Medications, dated 05/2021, revealed during administration of medications, the medication cart was to be kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse or aide. The facility failed to appropriately store drugs and biologicals in a locked compartment by not locking the medication cart.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide sanitary food preparation and storage for the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Tour of the kitchen, on 05/22/22 at 09:59 AM, with Dietary Staff BB revealed the following concerns: 1. The refrigerator contained two undated glasses of fruit punch, one undated opened carton of chocolate milk, and one undated glass of Kool-aide. 2. The freezer contained three undated serving bowls of scooped ice cream. 3. The hood over the stove had peeling paint inside the right front corner. On 05/22/22 at 09:59 AM, Dietary Staff BB, confirmed the above findings and agreed that the glasses of punch, Kool aide, and the open carton of chocolate milk. Staff should have labeled the items with the date it was opened, used, and stored in the refrigerator. Additionally, she confirmed the stove hood needed to be repaired to prevent food borne illnesses. The facility policy Food Safety-Storage, dated 04/2021, documentation included food would be stored and protected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to ensure a safe and sanitary environment for resident and staff in the laundry. Findings included: - On 05/24/22 at 03:24 PM, the laundry tour with Administrative Staff A, and Maintenance Staff U, revealed the following environmental concerns: 1. An unsanitizable bare wood riser/pallet under the laundry chemicals sat directly on the floor. 2. A three-foot section of base board missing in the laundry folding room that extended into the laundry processing room. 3. An approximate two-foot section of the wall, that extended from the dryer, had peeled/chipped paint. 4. The laundry folding room had six broken and cracked floor tiles. 5. The laundry folding counter tops had peeled laminate. 6. A ceiling in the folding laundry area with approximately a three foot round brown stain with a hole approximately two feet round open area. 7. In addition, a second hole in the ceiling that measured approximately four feet by five…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior in the room designated as the beauty shop. Findings included: - An observation on 05/24/22 at 03:34 PM revealed these findings: 1. A build-up of dust covered a black wheeled cart located between the two chairs with dryers, the sink pipes, and on the hair style products stored under the hinged countertop which covered the sink. 2. Both hair dryer vents covered with lint build-up. 3. The ceiling had a crack across the middle of the ceiling that measured approximately to the width of the ceiling. 4. The beauty shop chair contained opened cracks in the material at the top and the back of the backrest and rust was present to the base of the chair. 5. The cushion in the seat of the hair dryer chair contained hair and dust. 6. Both hair dryers had a layer of dust. 7. An undated bleach bottle stored directly on the floor. The bleach bottle had hair and a build-up of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 25 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent. Observation of 29 physician ordered medications revealed four medications in error, resulting in a medication error rate of 13.79%. These errors affected Resident (R)28, R23, and R130. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident (R)28, included a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated 05/2022 for R28 included an order, with a start date of 04/13/22, for Humalog insulin, 10 units, subcutaneously (under the skin), three times a day. If R28 would eat half of the meal, staff may administer six units. If the resident skipped the meal, may hold the insulin dose for that meal. The third dose of the day scheduled at 04:00 PM. On 05/23/22 at 04:27 PM R28 was in his room sitting up in his wheelchair. On 05/23/22 at 04:28 PM Licensed Nurse (LN) G…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-25 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents with 14 sampled, which included two residents reviewed for choices. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide choices for dependent Resident (R)7 related to his preferences for frequency of bath/shower. Findings included: - Review of the Resident (R)7's, Physician Orders, dated 05/18/22, revealed diagnoses which included after care following surgical bilateral (both sides) below the knee amputations, embolism (blood clot) of right lower extremity, and generalized anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented the resident with highly impaired vision. His Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated cognitively intact. He reported it was somewhat important to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or sponge bath. The resident required supervision of staff for bed mobility. He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-25 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents which included 14 residents sampled for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one selected Resident (R)22 after the resident experienced a change of condition in at least two or more activities of daily living (ADLs) with a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition, that had an impact on more than one area of the resident's health status Findings included: - Review of Resident's (R)22's, Physician Orders, dated 04/09/22, revealed diagnoses which included, legal blindness, major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), morbid obesity (severely overweight), lumbago (lower back pain), with sciatica (pain affecting the back hip, and outside of the leg, caused by compression of a spinal nerve root in the lower back) of the right side, chronic peripheral venous insufficiency (improper functioning of the vein valves in the leg, causing swelling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents which included 14 residents sampled for review which included one Resident (R)22 reviewed for Increase/Prevent Decrease in Mobility. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident (R)22 received needed treatment/care to maintain Range of Motion (ROM) an/or Mobility and/or to prevent further decline in ROM/Mobility. Findings included: - Review of Resident's (R)22's Physician Orders, dated 04/09/22, revealed diagnoses which included legal blindness, major depressive disorder ( abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness)), morbid obesity (severely overweight), lumbago (lower back pain), with sciatica (pain affecting the back hip, and outside of the leg, caused by compression of a spinal nerve root in the lower back) of the right side, chronic peripheral venous insufficiency (improper functioning of the vein valves in the leg, causing swelling and skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 residents. The sample of 14 residents included one resident (R)4 for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide R 4 needed respiratory care, consistent with professional standards of practice related to nebulizer treatment/care (an electrically powered machine that turns liquid medication into a mist so that it can be breathed directly into the lungs through a face mask or mouthpiece). Findings included: - Review of the Resident (R)4's, Physician Orders, dated 04/13/22, revealed diagnoses which included asthma ( a respiratory condition marked by spasms in the bronchi of the lungs causing difficulty breathing usually resulting from an allergic reaction or hypersensitivity) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with acute exacerbation (progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 25 resident with 14 residents sampled which included five residents sampled for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to act upon the pharmacist's recommendation in a timely manner to resolve identified irregularities for two residents, Resident (R)4 related to a recommended medication change and gradual dose reduction (GDR) of an antipsychotic medication for R 4 and R 9, related to GDR for psychoactive medications and recommended lab work. Findings Included: - Review of the Resident's (R)4's, Physician Orders, dated 04/13/22, revealed diagnoses which included lewy body dementia (a disease associated with abnormal deposits of a protein in the brain. Called Lewy bodies, affect chemicals in the brain whose changes, in turn can lead to problems with thinking, movement, behavior , and mood), with behavioral disturbances, anxiety disorder (fear characterized by behavioral disturbances) major depressive disorder (abnormal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-09-11 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to display accurate, publicly accessible staffing information that contained the number of actual nursing hours worked on a daily basis, for the 35 residents who resided in the facility. Findings included:- Review of the facility's Daily Staffing Sheets, from 08/16/25 through 09/09/25, revealed the actual hours worked had not been completed on the daily staffing sheets.On 09/10/25 at 12:53 PM, Administrative Nurse D confirmed the Daily Staffing Sheets lacked the actual nursing hours worked.The facility policy for Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, revised 11/2023, included: Shift staffing information shall be recorded and posted for each shift and include the total number and actual number of hours worked by staff directly responsible for resident care.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES — 30 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 52.9+2.1 vs chain
The other 29 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Colby Operator, LLCColby, KS 1 of 5Dickson Health And RehabDickson, TN 1 of 5Hutchinson Operator, LLCHutchinson, KS 1 of 5Kaw River Care And RehabEdwardsville, KS 1 of 5Lincoln Care And RehabWichita, KS 1 of 5North Ridge Health And RehabNew Hope, MN 1 of 5Providence Living CenterTopeka, KS 2 of 5Columbus Health and RehabColumbus, WI 2 of 5Edwardsville Care And RehabEdwardsville, KS 2 of 5El Dorado Care And RehabEl Dorado, KS 2 of 5Spring Hill Care And RehabSpring Hill, KS 3 of 5Eskridge Care And RehabEskridge, KS 3 of 5Lansing Care And RehabLansing, KS 3 of 5McPherson Operator, LLCMcPherson, KS 3 of 5Neodesha Care And RehabNeodesha, KS 3 of 5Parkway Operator LLCEdwardsville, KS 3 of 5Pittsburg Care And RehabPittsburg, KS 3 of 5Rolling Hills Health And RehabWichita, KS 3 of 5Wilson Care And RehabWilson, KS 4 of 5Arma Operator, LLCArma, KS 4 of 5Onaga Operator, LLCOnaga, KS 4 of 5Oswego Operator, LLCOswego, KS 4 of 5Peabody Health And RehabPeabody, KS 4 of 5Pratt Health And RehabPratt, KS 4 of 5Smith Center Health And RehabSmith Center, KS 4 of 5Wakefield Care And RehabWakefield, KS 5 of 5Botkin Care And RehabWellington, KS 5 of 5Downs Care And RehabDowns, KS 5 of 5Wellington Health And RehabWellington, KS

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CORONADO OPERATOR, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/01/2019
BARRES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2019
CURIS HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2019
T AND C CAPITAL ASSETS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2019
WINDWARD HEALTH PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2019
CHASE COUNTY OPERATOR, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2019
MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2019
LINDEMAN, STUARTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2019
THOMAS, TINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2019
YOAKUM, JAMIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/16/2024

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$224K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 10%Other / private 11%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $224K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$344per resident / day
operating cost
$10,452per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$361per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175223. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next