No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

El Dorado Care And Rehab

900 Country Club Lane, El Dorado, KS 67042 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 50 certified beds · (316) 321-4444 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (316) 321-4444 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 20261 actual-harm citation$33,505 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 2026
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $33,505 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-09)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (83%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
119 N Vine St · (316) 323-4436 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
700 N Main St · (316) 321-0318 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
109 S Main St · (316) 742-9927 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Rice Park0.5 mi
100 Random Rd · (913) 543-5160 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2585 N Debra Dr · (316) 322-7352

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.0%17.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.3%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.3%2.9%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.8%6.5%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%4.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.9%16.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.0%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.0%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.3%4.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.3%22.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.5%18.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.5%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine60.0%73.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.5%22.4%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.2%11.5%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.9%CMS range 43.7–77.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 7.5–16.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified91.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened13.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.69
RN hours/ resident / day
0.61
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.43
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.73
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
83.0%
Total nursing turnover
76.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 39.5 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.94 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 83% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-09)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-02)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a vegetarian diet to meet the resident's nutritional needs and failed to initiate weight loss interventions for R31, to prevent a significant weight loss of 16.30 percent (%) in 19 days. Additionally, the facility failed to provide R2 with a breakfast meal on scheduled dialysis (procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) treatment days, to meet R2's nutritional needs. Findings included:- R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). R31's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented she had behaviors of rejection of evaluation for 1-3 days in the look-back period, and she required supervision or touching for eating. R31's MDS documented she did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-09 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information through the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) as required. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing inadequate nurse staffing. Findings included: - The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Quarter 1 and FY 2025 Quarter 3 had excessively low weekend staff.On 04/08/26 at 10:44 AM, Administrative Staff A stated she was aware there was a problem and found that the previous Business Office Manager (BOM) had submitted the information incorrectly. She stated she was working with her new BOM to make sure it was being submitted correctly.The facility's Payroll Based Journal F851 policy, dated 10/25, documented that the community would submit the payroll data in a uniform format to CMS, including staffing information for community, agency, and contract staff. The direct care staff are those individuals who, through interpersonal contact with residents or resident care management,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the facility failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) when providing wound care to a Resident (R) 2 with a Foley catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag), colostomy (surgical creation of an artificial opening on the stomach wall to excrete feces from the body), and a hemodialysis port (a subcutaneous vascular access device placed under the skin to provide long-term access for hemodialysis {procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood}). The facility further failed to ensure adequate hand hygiene during care for R43, R31 and R8. Findings included: - During an observation on 04/07/26 at 08:16 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O and CNA P provided peri-care care to R43. CNA O opened R43's drawer and removed a tube of barrier cream, with the same gloved hand she used to provide R43's peri-care, then began to apply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store and label biologicals adequately when staff failed to date an insulin (medications used to treat high blood glucose levels) pen when opened and failed to remove or dispose of four expired bottles of stock medications. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk to receive expired, ineffective insulin and other residents at risk to receive expired ineffective stock medications. Findings included:.- On [DATE] at 08:05 AM, observation of the 100-200 hall medication cart revealed the following:R41's Novolog (long-acting insulin) pen without an open date or the discard date.On [DATE] at 08:15 AM, observation of the treatment cart revealed four expired stock medication bottles which included:ASA (pain and anti-inflammatory medication) 325 milligrams (mg), expired 01/26.Vitamin D (vitamin supplement) 100 tablets, expired 03/26.Calcium (bone building supplement) 600 mg and Vitamin D 5 micrograms (mcg), expired 07/25.Zinc (mineral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria and illness. Findings included:- Observation of the kitchen and food storage areas on 04/06/26 at 07:59 AM revealed the following areas of concern: The kitchen prep counter had staff's personal items laid on the counter, including a purse and a tumbler with a straw. The personal items laid next to several bags of undated hamburger and hot dog rolls. Two of the bags of rolls were not sealed. One bag of the hot dog rolls had three rolls that had fuzzy green colored areas on the rolls.Two bags of unsealed and undated potato chips laid on the same counter. At 08:01 AM, temperature logs hung on the front of the refrigerator door in the kitchen, which lacked recorded temperatures on 03/03/26, 03/04/26, and 03/05/26. Dietary Staff FF looked at the temperature logs and stated staff were to record the temperatures at least daily, and said there were a lot of new staff. At 08:05 AM continued initial tour of the kitchen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to promote dignity for one resident, Resident (R) 36, whose were exposed to other residents when his pants started to fall. Findings included:- On 0/06/26 at 11:55 AM, observation revealed during meal service, R36 stood up from the dining table. When he started to walk, his pants fell below his abdomen, and the top of his buttocks were exposed. Further observation revealed R36 grabbed onto the waistband of his pants to hold them up. An elderly female resident, R34, stated, I just saw that man's butt.On 06/07/26 at 12:10 PM, R36 was at the nurse's station on the phone. While he was standing there, the plaid pajama pants had slipped below his abdomen, and approximately a quarter of his buttocks were exposed. As R36 walked to the dining room, he kept pulling up his pants to keep them up.On 06/08/26 at 11:00 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) I stated R36 did not have a weight loss, so she did not know why his clothes were not fitting correctly, and that she would investigate the situation.On 06/08/26 at 12:50 PM, Administrative Nurse E…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 43 residents; 14 residents were sampled for advanced directives (a written document, which indicates the medical decisions for health care professionals when the person could not make their own decisions). Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's advanced directives were honored. Resident (R) 8's completed do not resuscitate (DNR- or no code, a legal document or order that means the person does not desire resuscitative measures) order was discontinued on [DATE]. Findings included:R8's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of tracheostomy status (opening through the neck into the trachea through which an indwelling tube may be inserted), chronic respiratory failure (CRF - a long-term, ongoing condition where the respiratory system fails to properly exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide, resulting in persistently low oxygen), and schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify, monitor, and respond to an injury of unknown origin/skin condition identified as and abrasion and redness on Resident (R) 8's forehead. Findings included:- R8's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure (CRF is a long-term, ongoing condition where the respiratory system fails to properly exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide, resulting in persistently low oxygen), and schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought). R8's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) could not be completed as the resident was rarely/never understood. Staff assessment revealed R8 had severely impaired cognition. R8 had no behaviors and required total assistance for all activities of daily living. R8's Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notification of a bed hold for a facility-initiated transfer for Resident (R) 5 when they were transferred to the hospital and failed to notify the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) of facility-initiated transfers/discharges for R5. Findings included: - R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), chronic kidney disease Stage 3 (moderate to severe loss of kidney function), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness). R5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS recorded R5 required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing for two residents, Resident (R) 22 and R37. The facility failed to provide grooming for R43, who had facial hair and dirty fingernails.Findings included:- R22s Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 01/ 06/26, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 8, indicating moderately impaired cognition. R22 required substantial staff assistance with lower body dressing and showers, and partial staff assistance with personal hygiene. R22's Care Plan, dated 01/29/26, directed one staff member to assist with bathing and use a shower chair, initiated on 10/07/22. The April 2026 Shower Sheets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent Resident (R) 43 received staff assistance in placing his hearing aids, which placed the resident at risk for social isolation, mental decline, and loss of independence. Findings included:- R43's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), and malformation of ear causing hearing impairment. R43's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) that could not be completed as the resident was rarely/never understood. Staff assessment revealed R31 had severely impaired cognition. R43's MDS revealed she wore a hearing aide. R43's Communication Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/17/25, documented R43 relied on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure a safe environment for one resident, Resident (R) 22, who had multiple falls in the facility dining room, and failed to follow her plan of care. Findings included:- R22's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), atrial fibrillation (rapid heartbeat), and muscle weakness. The Quarterly 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of eight, indicating moderately impaired cognition. R22 required partial staff assistance for eating, mobility, transfers, and did not ambulate. R22 had no functional impairment and had no falls since the prior assessment. The Quarterly MDS, dated 01/06/26, documented a BIMS of 8, indicating moderately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to facilitate the necessary dental care services for Resident (R)1. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD-backflow of stomach contents to the esophagus), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), and protein calorie malnutrition (a severe form of undernutrition caused by inadequate intake of protein, calories, and essential nutrients, or by high metabolic demand). R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The assessment revealed R1 was independent with oral hygiene and personal care. The assessment revealed that R1 did not have any natural teeth or tooth fragments, no inflamed or bleeding gums, and no broken or loosely fitting full or partial dentures. R1's Dental Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 03/06/26,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines, placing the residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs. Findings included:- On 04/06/26 at 09:00AM, observation revealed R48 sat in a wheelchair in her room with the bedside table in front of her awaiting her breakfast tray. Continued observation revealed at 09:30 AM a nurse aide came into R48's room and R48 inquired when her breakfast would be delivered. The nurse aide stated the kitchen had not delivered the food cart to the hall and when they did, she would deliver R48's room tray. On 04/06/26 at 10:00 AM, observation revealed R48 sat in a wheelchair in her room with her bedside table in front of her awaiting breakfast to be delivered to her room On 04/06/26 at 10:05 AM, Administrative Nurse D and Administrative Nurse E were summonsed to R48's room and the surveyor inquired when R48 would and should receive her breakfast and they stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 37 residents. The sample included eight residents who were reviewed for misappropriation. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)1, R2, and R3 remained free from misappropriation when staff wrote checks and forged signatures to cash the checks without appropriate authorization.Findings included:- R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), cognitive communication deficit, generalized muscle weakness, and a need for assistance with personal care.R1's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The assessment documented that R1 had minimal difficulty hearing but did not have hearing aid devices. R1 required supervision or setup assistance with most activities of daily living (ADL).R1's Quarterly MDS dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 34 residents with 14 residents selected for review, which included one resident reviewed for self-determination. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R)5, received appropriate preparations for his scheduled surgery. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)5's diagnoses included paraplegia (paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk) due to demyelinating (a disease of the spinal cord, nerves and brain causing paralysis and weakness) disease of the central nervous system, and cutaneous (in the skin) abscess (cavity containing pus and surrounded by inflamed tissue) of the abdominal wall. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated normal cognitive function. The resident had impairment in both lower extremities and no impairment in upper extremities. The Activities of Daily Living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 34 residents. The sample of 14 residents included three residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide two Residents (R), R27 and R 3, who required respiratory care, including tracheostomy (opening through the neck into the trachea through which an indwelling tube may be inserted) care and tracheal suctioning, provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences related to the storage of suctioning cannulas/tubing to when not in use to prevent infection and cross contamination to prevent infection. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)27's Physician Orders, dated 08/07/24 revealed the following diagnoses that included spastic quadriplegia (inability to move the arms, legs and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), cerebral palsy (progressive disorder of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 34 residents. The sample of 14 residents included five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications monitored and administered to treat Resident (R)19's heart failure. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 19's Physician Orders, dated 08/07/24, revealed diagnosis that included congestive heart failure. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating cognitively intact. The resident rejected evaluation of care one to three days a week. The Quarterly MDS, dated 06/21/24, documented changes in the resident status which included a BIMS score of 13, which represented a decline in his cognition. R 19's Care Plan dated 08/29/24, directed staff the resident received multiple medications to treat his diagnoses. The staff should administer medications as ordered, monitor for side effects and effectiveness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored, prepared, and distributed in a manner to prevent foodborne illness to the residents. Findings included: - Observation, on 09/30/24 at 10:02 AM, revealed the kitchen refrigerator contained six squirt bottles of condiments (salad dressings) that lacked coverings over the tips of the squirt bottles. Observation, on 10/02/24 at 10:57 AM, during environmental tour of the kitchen with Dietary Staff BB, revealed the following areas of concern: 1. The kitchen refrigerator contained six squirt bottles of condiments (salad dressings) that lacked coverings over the tips of the squirt bottles. 2. The kitchen handwashing sink contained a black substance along the back edge caulking and brown/yellow discolorations on the sink back edges. 3. The air fryer/convection oven contained splatters of a black substance on the upper interior surface. 4. The ice machine drain laid directly in the drain without a two-inch air gap. Interview, on 10/02/24 at 11:15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 34 residents with 14 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided incontinence care in a manner to prevent the spread of infection for one Resident (R)13 with an open wound on her sacrum (large triangular bone between the two hip bones). Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)13's medical record revealed diagnoses that included diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), heart failure, cerebral infarction (CVA/stroke) - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) and sacral (large triangular bone between the two hip bones) pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). The Annual Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain patient care equipment in safe operating conditions to ensure two residents, Resident (R)82 and R2's commode grab bars and over the toilet commode. Findings included: - Observation, on 10/01/24 at 03:30 PM, revealed Resident (R)2's the over the toilet commode contained four legs that wobbled when pressure applied to the armrests, making it unstable. Observation, on 10/01/24 at 03:51 PM, revealed commode grab bars in Resident (R)82's bathroom, were unstable and moved when the resident attempted to sit or rise from the commode. Interview, on 10/01/24 at 04:00 PM, with Administrative Staff A stated she would expect staff to enter a maintenance request into their electronic system for maintenance tasks. The facility lacked a policy for maintenance of commode grab bars and over the toilet commode. The facility failed to ensure the commode grab bars for R82 and over the toilet commode for R2 were maintained in a safe condition to prevent accidents.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 37 residents. The sample included four residents sampled for quality of care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that three Residents(R)2, R 3, and R 4, received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and/or the residents' choices, related to skin treatments for ostomies (an artificial opening in an organ created during an operation as ordered by the physician. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)2's, undated Physician Orders, documentation revealed diagnoses which included quadriplegia (inability to move the arms, legs, and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), urinary tract infection, and retention of urine. The Annual Minimum Data Set, dated 07/13/23, documented the resident's short term and long-term memory intact. He had an indwelling catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag). The Urinary Incontinence Care Area Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 37 residents. The sample included four residents sampled for procedures of following physician orders. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three Residents(R)2, R 3, and R 4, received treatment and care in accordance with physician's orders related to skin treatments for ostomies (an artificial opening in an organ created during an operation as ordered by the physician). Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)2's, undated Physician Orders, documentation revealed diagnoses which included quadriplegia (inability to move the arms, legs, and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), urinary tract infection, and retention of urine. The Annual Minimum Data Set, dated 07/13/23, documented the resident's short term and long-term memory intact. He had an indwelling catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag). The Urinary Incontinence Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 07/26/23, triggered secondary to use of a supra pubic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, and homelike environment for the residents in the facility beauty shop, a resident hallway, the quiet room, and in the dining room. Findings included: - Observation, on 10/17/22 at 09:23 AM, with Maintenance Staff U, revealed the following areas of concern: The beauty shop contained a pink beautician's chair with a discolored grime covering all surfaces and tan/gray discolorations on the backrest top surface on each side approximately five by two inches. The base of the chair contained several areas of rusted surface. A corner of the floor contained loose cove base approximately four inches with soiled discolorations on the floor tile in this corner. The ceiling contained areas of stainage approximately 12 by 12 inches. The hair dryer filter contained a layer of dust across the entire surface. The threshold to a resident hallway contained an accumulation of discolored grime and the carpet in this hallway contained stains ranging in size of approximately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure an environment as free of accident hazards as possible when the facility failed to ensure portable oxygen tanks were kept in a secure upright position. Findings included: - Observation, on 10/13/22 at 10:00 AM, revealed a portable oxygen cylinder with nasal canula tubing attached, positioned near the inside dining room door to the patio. This oxygen cylinder lacked a stabilizing base or cart to ensure stability. Observation, on 10/13/22 at 10:24 AM, revealed Administrative Nurse D, placed the portable oxygen cylinder on the back holder of an unsampled resident's wheelchair who had been outside on the patio smoking. Observation, on 10/17/22 at 11:30 AM, revealed a portable oxygen cylinder leaning against a bookcase in Resident (R)1 room. The cylinder lacked a stabilizing base or cart to ensure stability. Observation, on 10/17/22 at 11:40 AM, revealed a portable oxygen tank sitting across a chair in R 11's room. Interview, on 10/17/22 at 12:01 PM, with Administrative Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 35 residents with 16 residents sampled. The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan to include the need for assistance with oral hygiene needs for one (R)137 sampled resident. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)137's electronic medical record (EMR), included a diagnosis of traumatic subdural hemorrhage (bleeding in the area between the brain and the skull). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the staff assessment for cognition revealed severe impairment. The resident required total assistance of one staff for personal hygiene and had no dental issues. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/07/22, did not trigger for further review. The baseline care plan, dated 10/05/22, lacked staff instruction for ADLs which also included the resident's need for assistance with oral hygiene cares. Review of the resident's EMR, from 10/04/22 through 10/18/22, revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 35 residents with 16 residents sampled, including four residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate hygiene cares for two fo the four sampled residents including: dependent Resident (R)137, regarding oral hygiene cares and R31 with grooming of facial hairs. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)137's electronic medical record (EMR), included a diagnosis of traumatic subdural hemorrhage (bleeding in the area between the brain and the skull). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the staff assessment for cognition revealed severe impairment. The resident required total assistance of one staff for personal hygiene and had no dental issues. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/07/22, did not trigger for further review. The baseline care plan, dated 10/05/22, lacked staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 35 residents with 16 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for wheelchair positioning. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate body alignment of foot support for the one sampled dependent Resident (R)20, while in her wheelchair. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)20's electronic medical record (EMR), included a diagnosis of cerebral accident (CVA or stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She required total assistance of two staff for transfers and one staff for locomotion on the unit. She had no limitation in range of motion (ROM) and used a wheelchair. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Functional/Rehabilitation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 35 residents with 16 selected for review which included four residents reviewed for urinary catheter/urinary tract infection. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure secure placement of a urinary catheter for one Resident (R)31 of the four residents reviewed. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)31's Physician Order Sheet, undated, revealed diagnoses included cerebral palsy (progressive disorder of movement, muscle tone or posture caused by injury or abnormal development in the immature brain, most often before birth), reflux uropathy (blockage of the normal flow of urine), urinary retention (when urine does not drain for the bladder), and history of e coli sepsis (severe infection with a type of bacteria known as Escherichia coli which is the most common cause of urinary tract infections). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with normal cognitive function and required extensive assistance of two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 35 residents with 16 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for tube feeding and weight. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff gave the correct higher calorie physician ordered formula to the one sampled tube feeding Resident (R)137, which resulted in a 4.07% (percent) weight loss. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)137's electronic medical record (EMR), included the following diagnoses: traumatic subdural hemorrhage (bleeding in the area between the brain and the skull) and type II diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the staff assessment for cognition revealed severe impairment. He required total assistance of one staff for eating and received 51% or more of his total calories through the tube feeding. He weighed 163 pounds. The Feeding Tube Care Area Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 35 residents with 16 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for respiratory. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean, sanitary storage of the one sampled Resident's (R)11 bilevel positive airway pressure mask (BIPAP-a device that helps with breathing), to prevent respiratory infections. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)11's electronic medical record (EMR), included a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. He required total assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers. He had shortness of breath (SOB) with exertion and when lying flat. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 35 residents with 16 selected for review which included six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed medication administration holding parameters for one of the six sampled residents, Resident (R)25. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)25's Physician Order Sheet, dated 10/01/22, revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and ateriosclerotic heart disease (thickening and hardening of the arteries of the heart). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with normal cognitive function and received seven days of a diuretic (medication to reduce excess fluid in the body) within the seven-day look-back period. The ADL (Activity of Daily Living) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 03/20/22, assessed the resident had impaired balance and transition during transfers and functional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 35 residents with 16 selected for review which included six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility consulting pharmacist failed to identify the lack of the facility following physician order parameters for holding the administration of antihypertensive medications for one Resident (R)25, of the six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)25's Physician Order Sheet, dated 10/01/22, revealed diagnoses that included hypertension (elevated blood pressure) and ateriosclerotic heart disease (thickening and hardening of the arteries of the heart). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with normal cognitive function and received seven days of a diuretic (medication to reduce excess fluid in the body) within the seven-day look-back period. The ADL (Activity of Daily Living) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-10-18 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Based on observation and interview the facility failed to post actual hours worked by the nursing staff as required. Findings included: - Review of the Nursing Staff posting revealed a dry erase board on the entry way wall. This board lacked the resident census number and lacked indication that the numbers on the board indicated the actual hours worked by nursing staff. Review of the Daily Assignment Sheet revealed the following areas of concern: The month of July 2022 lacked completion of the form to indicate the actual hours worked by staff with the exception of July 5th and July 14th. The month of August 2022 lacked completion of the form to indicate the actual hours worked by staff. The month of September 2022 contained two days with completion of the actual hours worked by staff. Through the current date, the month of October 2022 contained 10/12/22 lacking completion of actual hours worked by staff. Interview, on 10/18/22 at 08:15 AM, with Administrative Nurse D revealed the charge nurse updates the dry erase board to indicate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$33,505 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $16,350 — penalty dated 2026-04-09
  • $17,155 — penalty dated 2026-04-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES — 30 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 29 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
1 of 5Colby Operator, LLCColby, KS 1 of 5Dickson Health And RehabDickson, TN 1 of 5Hutchinson Operator, LLCHutchinson, KS 1 of 5Kaw River Care And RehabEdwardsville, KS 1 of 5Lincoln Care And RehabWichita, KS 1 of 5North Ridge Health And RehabNew Hope, MN 1 of 5Providence Living CenterTopeka, KS 2 of 5Columbus Health and RehabColumbus, WI 2 of 5Edwardsville Care And RehabEdwardsville, KS 2 of 5Spring Hill Care And RehabSpring Hill, KS 3 of 5Chase County Care And RehabCottonwood Falls, KS 3 of 5Eskridge Care And RehabEskridge, KS 3 of 5Lansing Care And RehabLansing, KS 3 of 5McPherson Operator, LLCMcPherson, KS 3 of 5Neodesha Care And RehabNeodesha, KS 3 of 5Parkway Operator LLCEdwardsville, KS 3 of 5Pittsburg Care And RehabPittsburg, KS 3 of 5Rolling Hills Health And RehabWichita, KS 3 of 5Wilson Care And RehabWilson, KS 4 of 5Arma Operator, LLCArma, KS 4 of 5Onaga Operator, LLCOnaga, KS 4 of 5Oswego Operator, LLCOswego, KS 4 of 5Peabody Health And RehabPeabody, KS 4 of 5Pratt Health And RehabPratt, KS 4 of 5Smith Center Health And RehabSmith Center, KS 4 of 5Wakefield Care And RehabWakefield, KS 5 of 5Botkin Care And RehabWellington, KS 5 of 5Downs Care And RehabDowns, KS 5 of 5Wellington Health And RehabWellington, KS

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CORONADO OPERATOR, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/01/2019
BARRES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2019
CURIS HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2019
T AND C CAPITAL ASSETS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2019
WINDWARD HEALTH PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2019
YOAKUM, JAMIEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/02/2024
EL DORADO OPERATOR LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2019
MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2019
BRYANT, RODNEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/04/2024
LINDEMAN, STUARTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2019
OLSEN, JOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/04/2024
THOMAS, TINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2019

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$233K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 8%Other / private 14%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $233K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$315per resident / day
operating cost
$9,579per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$356per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175324. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next