Wilson Care And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 37.3 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 34 residents, with 12 included in the sample. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff donned (put on) the appropriate required Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) before providing direct cares to Resident (R) 5 and ensure staff did not set R5's catheter bag (medical device that collects urine) directly on the resident's floor. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff donned the required EBP and performed hand hygiene prior to and during the wound dressing change for R15. Findings included:- On 12/10/25 at 11:23 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G gathered and prepared wound care supplies (placed gauze pads into a clean plastic cup and placed zinc ointment into a clean cup) on the treatment cart outside of R15's room. LN G gathered the wound care supplies in her hands as she knocked on R15's door to announce herself and explained she was going to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to resolve recurring issues reported by the Resident Council. Findings included:- A review of the facility's Resident Council Minutes from 12/10/24 to 11/28/25 indicated the council had recurring concerns with call light response times and delivery of care. The Resident Council Minutes for 04/08/25 noted the resident's had concerns with call lights being turned off, staff leaving, and then not returning to complete their requests. In addition, the council requested that staff be quiet during activities like church and movies. The facility's response to the council's concern included that staff were provided with re-education pertaining to answering resident call lights and noted staff would show respect during activities such as church or movies at the nurse's station. The Resident Council Minutes for 05/28/25 again noted the resident call lights were being turned off by staff without completing cares, staff remaining loud during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with three reviewed for Medicare Liability Notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the resident (or representative) a fully completed Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Form 10055 for skilled services for Resident (R) 2, R20, and R28, which included the estimated cost of services.Findings included:- The Medicare Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) informed the beneficiary that they may not pay for future skilled therapy services and provided a place for a cost estimate of continued services. The form included an option for the beneficiary to (1) receive specified therapy listed, and bill Medicare for an official decision on payment. The form had a place for the resident to document they understood that if Medicare did not pay, they were responsible for payment but could appeal to Medicare. The form further documented under part (2) the resident could receive therapy listed, but would not bill Medicare, would be responsible…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported the omission of blood pressure or pulse monitoring for Resident (R) 4 prior to the administration of the antihypertensive (a class of medication used to treat high blood pressure) beta blocker (a medications that reduce the workload of the heart by slowing its rate and relaxing blood vessels) Carvedilol. The facility failed to implement recommendations made by the CP for a dosage amount for R4's Voltaren gel (a topical medication used to relieve arthritis pain). Findings included:- R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of hypertension (HTN- elevated blood pressure), aneurysm of the heart (a bulge in the weakened wall of the heart), traumatic brain injury (damage to the brain from an external force, like a blow,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that blood pressure or pulse monitoring was obtained for Resident (R) 4 prior to the administration of the antihypertensive (a class of medication used to treat high blood pressure) beta blocker (a medications that reduce the workload of the heart by slowing its rate and relaxing blood vessels) Carvedilol. The facility failed to ensure a physician-ordered dosage amount was indicated for R4's Voltaren gel (a topical medication used to relieve arthritis pain). Finding included:- R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of hypertension (HTN- elevated blood pressure), aneurysm of the heart (a bulge in the weakened wall of the heart), traumatic brain injury (damage to the brain from an external force, like a blow, jolt, or penetrating object, causing physical, cognitive,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 2's injectable medications were not expired. Findings included:- On [DATE] at 08:11 AM, during the medication/treatment cart initial tour, two Lispro injectable pens with an open date of [DATE] were noted for R2. Licensed Nurse (LN) G verified the medication was put into use on [DATE] and expired 30 days after being opened and put into use. On [DATE] 12:55 PM, Administrative Nurse D verified R2's Lispro injectable pens expired 30 days from the open date and stated the pens should be discarded. The facility's Storage of Medication policy, dated 03/2025, documented that the facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed per state regulation.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one resident, Resident (R) 7, reviewed for Hospice care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the collaboration of care between R7's hospice provider and the facility which included the hospice provider contact information, the services the hospice provider would provide to the resident, the supplies, equipment and medications the hospice provider would provide, as well as how often hospice staff members would visit the facility. Findings included: - R7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of hypertension (HTN- elevated blood pressure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), benign hyperplasia (BPH- non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency, and urinary tract…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. The facility had one kitchen. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate sanitation of dishware used for preparing, and serving residents' meals, and failed to prepare, store, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions for the 34 residents in the facility, who receive their meals from the kitchen. This deficient practice placed the residents of the facility at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included: - On 01/30/24 at 08:40 AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff (DS) CC operated the dishwasher and attempted to test the dishwasher rinse for chemical sanitation. The wash and rinse temperatures were 105 degrees Fahrenheit (F). DS CC used sanitizer testing strips which indicated no chemicals. The dishwasher was connected to Betco low-temperature machine sanitizer and used [NAME] All Temperature Rinse Aide and [NAME] All Temperature Dish Machine Detergent. The Dishwasher Temperature Logs, dated January 2024,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-05 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 34 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information through the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) as required. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing inadequate nurse staffing. Findings included: - The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 the PBJ report for Quarter 2 indicated the facility had excessively low weekend staff. The PBJ report for Quarter 3 indicated the facility did not have licensed nurse coverage 24 hours a day, seven days a week on following days: 04/01/23, 04/02/23, 04/08/23, 04/15/23, 04/17/23, 04/19/23, 04/22/23, 04/29/23, 04/30/23, 05/06/23, 05/20/23, 05/27/23, 05/28/23, 06/03/23, 06/10/23, 06/11/23, 06/24/23, and 06/25/23 and had excessive low weekend staff. A review of the facility licensed nurse payroll data for the dates listed on the PBJ revealed a licensed nurse was on duty for 24 hours a day seven days a week. On 02/05/24 at 01:15 PM, Administrative Staff A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-05 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 34 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to resolve grievances recorded during resident council meetings. This placed the residents at the facility at risk for unresolved grievances and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - Review of the Resident Council Minutes from February 2023 to January 2024 recorded grievances from the resident council which staff had not addressed the residents' concerns regarding Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) and staff on their personal phones during care (five meetings the concern was expressed), too much noise at nights and TV too loud in the commons area (six meetings the concern was expressed), short staffing (three meetings the concerns were expressed), and various other concerns not addressed. A review of the facility's Grievance/Variance Log from January 2023 to December 2023 recorded grievances that were unresolved or ongoing. On 02/01/24 at 09:30 AM, In an interview with four residents, the residents verbalized they had concerns and grievances with the above-documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES — 30 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $215K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS