Wachusett Manor
32 Hospital Hill Road, Gardner, MA 01440 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 96 certified beds · (978) 632-5477 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.0% | 16.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.1% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 90.0% | 15.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.3% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.4% | 15.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.5% | 19.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.8% | 4.2% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.5% | 21.2% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.6% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.9% | 77.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.4% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.5% | 11.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.39 | 1.88 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.12 | 1.50 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
57.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 121 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 57.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 57.8%CMS range 49.0–67.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 14.1%CMS range 10.1–18.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 57.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 63.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.9%CMS range 5.0–16.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.81 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 90.3 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-05-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided treatment and care that met professional standards of quality for one Resident (#89) out of one applicably sampled resident with a tracheostoma (opening to make a direct airway through the trachea [windpipe]) and laryngectomy (removal of the larynx [voice box] resulting in the trachea [airway] being brought to the skin as a stoma [opening] in the front of the neck) tube, out of two total discharged residents sampled. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure its licensed nursing staff provided necessary and timely respiratory care, in an effective manner, when Resident #89 experienced a decline in respiratory status at 11:45 A.M. on [DATE], and nursing staff administered Oxygen via nasal cannula and nebulizer (drug delivery device used to administer medication in the form of a mist into the lungs) treatments via nose/mouth versus laryngectomy tube, resulting in the Oxygen and medication not reaching the lungs. The Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-05-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided necessary respiratory care for one Resident (#89) with a tracheostoma (opening to make a direct airway through the trachea [windpipe]) and laryngectomy (removal of the larynx [voice box] resulting in the trachea [airway] being brought to the skin as a stoma [opening] in the front of the neck) tube, of one applicably sampled resident, out of a total sample of two discharged residents. Specifically, facility staff failed to provide necessary respiratory care when Resident #89 required assistance to manage his/her laryngectomy tube and experienced a decline in respiratory status on [DATE], and nursing staff administered oxygen and nebulizer (drug delivery device used to administer medication in the form of a mist into the lungs) treatments via nose/mouth versus laryngectomy tube, resulting in the oxygen and medication not reaching the lungs. Resident #89 further decompensated as a result, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-05-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide competent nursing staff to care for one Resident (#89), of one applicably sampled resident who had a tracheostoma (opening to make a direct airway through the trachea [windpipe]) and laryngectomy (removal of the larynx [voice box] resulting in the trachea [airway] being brought to the skin as a stoma [opening] in the front of the neck) tube, out of two total discharged residents sampled. Specifically, the facility had no evidence that its licensed nursing staff had the competency and skill sets required to provide the care and services for residents with a laryngectomy tube when Resident #89 experienced a decline in respiratory status on [DATE] and nursing staff administered Oxygen via nasal cannula and nebulizer (drug delivery device used to administer medication in the form of a mist into the lungs) treatments via nose/mouth versus laryngectomy tube, resulting in the Oxygen and medication not reaching the lungs. The Resident further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-26 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide notification of transfer and discharge to the State Office of the Long-term Care Ombudsman for five Residents (#51, #43, #53, #92, and #7) out of six applicable residents reviewed, out of total sample of 19 Residents, and one discharged Resident (#89) out of three discharge records reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to send a copy of the notice of transfer and discharge to a Representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman when Resident's #51, #43, #53, #92, #7, and #89 were transferred to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Transfer and Discharge Policy and Procedure dated 2025 indicated:-Ensure resident transfers and discharges are properly documented.-Send a copy of the notice of transfer and discharge to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman.-The facility shall maintain evidence that the notice was sent to the Ombudsman 1. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the Physician of pertinent information for one Resident (#5) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #5, the facility failed to notify the Physician as ordered, when the Resident's Finger Stick Blood Sugar (FSBS) level was greater than 350 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dl). Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, dated 2001 revised December 2023, included:-The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or Physician on call when there has been a (an): specific instruction to notify the Physician of changes in the resident's condition.-The nurse will record in the resident's medical record information relative to changes in the resident's medical/mental condition or status. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM 2) with ketoacidosis without Coma, dependence on Renal Dialysis, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an adequate resolution of a filed grievance on behalf of one Resident (#4), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #4, the facility failed to thoroughly review, investigate, adequately resolve a grievance, and provide a written grievance resolution to Resident #4 when the Resident had complaints of noise in their room at night that affected his/her sleep. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident and Family Concerns and Grievances Policy and Procedure, 2025, indicated: -The purpose is to provide prompt resolution of medical and non-medical grievances while maintaining confidentiality, in accordance with applicable federal and state statutes and regulations. -The facility will make reasonable efforts to ensure that all grievances are adequately resolved within thirty (30) calendar days from the day the grievance is received. -The facility will advise the resident of the outcome of the grievance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for one Resident #8), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to address the Resident's history of self-injurious behaviors. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised September 2023, included but was not limited to: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. -Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' condition change. -The interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan: >when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; >when the desired outcome is not met; >when the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to adhere to infection control standards of practice, increasing the risk of contamination and spread of infections on one unit (second floor short hall unit) out of three units, and three resident rooms located on the second-floor short hall unit. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure proper cleaning and disinfecting of shared resident equipment after use for residents who were on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- measures using protective barrier gowns and gloves as an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms [MDRO] during high contact resident care) when Nurse #1 completed vital signs for two residents. -Follow appropriate hand hygiene standards prior to entering and exiting three resident rooms with EBP precaution signage clearly visible, while completing vital signs monitoring. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised December 2024, included but not limited to: -Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had recently been readmitted with new diagnoses of aspiration pneumonia (infection caused by inhaling something other than air into the lungs), and pericardial effusion (fluid around the heart), the Facility failed to ensure nursing notified the Provider when he/she experienced further decline with a change in condition. Findings include: Review of the Facility's policy titled, Acute Condition Changes-Clinical Protocol, revised March 2018 indicated: - The nurse will notify the residents' attending physician or physician on call when there has been a significant change in the resident (decrease in food intake, changes in skin color or condition). Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in December 2024, diagnoses included Atrial Fibrillation, presence of cardiac pacemaker, hypertension, coronary artery disease, unstable angina, and protein calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #1's Hospital Discharge summary dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was a full code, who during the evening shift (3:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M.) on [DATE], was found unresponsive, pulseless with no respirations by the nursing staff, the facility failed to ensure he/she was provided care and services that met professional standards of nursing practice, when although nursing staff initiated a Code Blue, called 911, and provided Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), to him/her until Emergency Services arrived, nursing failed to obtain and use the facility's Automated External Defibrillator (AED) device, during the Code Blue. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Emergency Procedure-Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Basic Life Support, dated [DATE], indicated the following: - Activation and retrieval of the AED by the lone healthcare provider or by the second person sent by the rescuer, must occur immediately after the check for no normal breathing and no pulse, -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices designed to prevent development and transmission of infection and provide a sanitary environment for two Residents (#20 and #67) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, facility staff failed to: 1. adhere to Standard Precautions (infection prevention measures that apply to all resident care, regardless of suspected or confirmed infection status) and Contact Precautions (infection prevention measures used to prevent transmission of infections which are spread by direct or indirect contact with the resident or the resident's environment) when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 provided personal care to Resident #20, who required Contact Precautions relative to a multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO), then handled Resident #67's wheelchair, increasing Resident #67's risk for illness. 2. distribute ice in a sanitary manner into bins used to keep residents' drink items cool for meal service, increasing the residents' risk for illness. 3. implement the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-13 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure that the facility was free of pests in the main facility kitchen, on two units (Unit Two and Unit Four) and in the residents rooms for three Residents (#17, #69 and #290). Specifically, the facility staff failed to implement measures to eradicate and contain small flies located in the facility's main kitchen, the kitchenette on Unit Two, dining room on Unit Four, and in Resident's #17, #69 and #290 rooms, increasing the risk for contamination of clean surfaces and transmission of infectious pathogens. Findings include: Review of the North Carolina State University Extension Publication titled Phorid Flies (https://content.ces.ncsu.edu/phorid-flies) dated 11/17/21 indicated: -Phorid flies are mainly nuisance pests, but there are some cases of larval infestations of human orifices such as the eyes, wounds, and intestines. -Phorid flies are capable of transmitting bacterial pathogens onto foods or working surfaces in food preparation facilities. -These…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment on one Unit (#4) out of three units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the flooring in the Unit #4 multi-purpose room was in good repair and homelike condition. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Homelike Environment, dated 2001 and revised February 2021, indicated the following: -Staff provides person-centered care that emphasizes the residents' comfort, independence, and personal needs and preferences. -Facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. On 8/8/24 at 7:45 A.M., the surveyor observed the following in the residents' multi-purpose room on Unit #4: -Several gouges and holes in the flooring throughout the room. -One area where the flooring was torn and lifted at the transition from the hallway into the multi-purpose room. On 8/8/24 at 8:45 A.M., the surveyor observed several residents seated in the Unit #4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record, and policy review, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to providing a pressure redistribution cushion (cushion that spreads pressure more evenly across its surface to reduce the amount of pressure on any one part of the body) to a wheelchair when the Resident was at risk for skin breakdown for one Resident (#5) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #5 the facility staff failed to: -Follow a Physician's order to provide a pressure redistribution cushion to the Resident's wheelchair. -Implement the Resident's care plan for a new cushion to the Resident's wheelchair. -Provide a pressure relieving device to the Resident's chair as indicated in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment and for the Resident who was assessed as being at a high risk for skin breakdown. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Support Surface Guidelines, dated September 2013, included: -Review the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#43) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: -verify the Physician orders for the appropriate liter per minute (LPM- the flow rate that supplemental oxygen is set for delivery) of Oxygen when the Resident was ordered for seven (7) LPM of Oxygen. -ensure that Resident #43 was administered the appropriate liter flow for the oxygen delivery device (nasal cannula - a thin flexible tube that provides supplemental oxygen to patients through the nose via nasal prongs) being used when the Resident was found to be ordered for and administered greater than six (6) LPM of Oxygen that was not compliant with professional standards of practice. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, revised October 2010, indicated the following: -Verify that there is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#71) out of a total sample of 19 residents received trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to complete a trauma history assessment for Resident #71 who had a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD: a mental and behavioral disorder that develops from having experienced a traumatic event, causing flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety), placing the Resident at risk for re-traumatization. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Trauma Informed and Culturally Competent Care Level III, last revised August 2022, indicated the following: -Purpose: >To guide staff in providing care that is culturally competent and trauma informed in accordance with professional standards. >To address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. -Resident Screening: >Utilize initial screening to identify the need for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dental services for one Resident (#2) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to obtain consent for dental services from Resident #2's Health Care Proxy (HCP- the person chosen as the healthcare decision maker when the individual is unable to do so for themself) in a timely manner after the HCP had been invoked (made active by the Physician). Findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in May 2022, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease beginning with mild memory loss and leading to the loss of the ability to carry on a conversation and respond to the environment, involves parts of the brain that control thought, memory, and language) and lack of coordination. Review of the facility policy for Dental Examination/Assessment, last revised December 2023, indicated: -That each resident will undergo a dental assessment within .90 days of admission.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident wheelchairs in a clean and sanitary manner for two Residents (#291 and #293), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that: 1. Residents #291's wheelchair was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. 2. Resident #293's wheelchair was clean and sanitary. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Cleaning Wheelchairs and Gerichairs (specialized recliners that are upholstered in non-permeable, easily sanitized vinyl), revised 9/5/2017, indicated: -If items (wheelchairs and gerichairs) are the responsibility of Environmental Services, the first step is .arrange to get wheelchairs or gerichairs from the residents at a convenient time for the resident. -Set up a schedule, with input from Nursing, to collect, wash, and dry chairs. -Take chairs to an open area - basement or shower room- use pressure washer or scrub by hand with a brush or sponge and germicide solution. -Rinse thoroughly with water and dry completely with rags. Pay special attention to the seats…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-05-16 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and Facility Assessment Tool review, the facility failed to ensure its staff implemented the Facility Assessment Tool's staff training/education and competencies plan, and updated the Facility Assessment Tool to accurately reflect the resident population and care needs for day-to-day operations and medical emergencies for one Resident (#89) out of one applicably sampled resident with a laryngectomy (removal of the larynx [voice box] resulting in the trachea [airway] being brought to the skin as a stoma [opening] in the front of the neck) tube, out of a total of two discharged residents sampled. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure its staff identified the need for licensed nurse education/training and competencies relative to day-to-day care and emergency care for residents with laryngectomy tubes when Resident #89 was admitted to the facility, and laryngectomy tube care needs were not identified on the Facility Assessment Tool. Findings include: Review of the Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff implemented an infection prevention and control program to provide a sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure its staff 1. implemented a surveillance plan to identify the potential presence of Legionella (a bacteria that can grow and multiply in moist areas of a building's water system and cause lung infection) within the facility, and 2. implemented the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), to prevent the transmission of infection, while handling soiled linen in the facility laundry room. Findings include: 1) Review of the facility document titled Interim Water Management Program for Legionella Risk Reduction created August of 2017 indicated the following: - each facility must establish a Water Management Team. - the team is responsible for implementing policies and procedures presented in the document. - hot water temperatures should be monitored and recorded daily, flush hot water in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-05-16 · tag F0888 — widespreadEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff maintained a system to track and accurately document staff COVID-19 vaccination status. Findings include: Review of the facility COVID-19 Staff Vaccination Policy, last revised in June 2022 indicated the following: - the infection preventionist maintains a tracking worksheet of staff members and their vaccination status. - the tracking worksheet is the most current vaccination status of all staff who provide any care, treatment or other services for the facility and/or its residents. Review of the COVID-19 Staff Vaccination Status for Providers documentation provided by the Director of Nurses (DON) indicated there were 43 staff who were partially vaccinated for COVID-19, 20 staff were completely vaccinated for COVID-19 and nine staff who were granted non-medical exemptions for the vaccine. Further review indicated there was a total of 72 staff in the facility and 40.3% of the staff were completely vaccinated for COVID-19. Review of the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided an environment as free of accident hazard as possible for four Residents (#34, #56, #72, and #24) out of 24 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide: 1. adequate supervision and assistance for Resident #34 when the Resident with diagnosis of dementia, was being transported to an appointment outside the facility, and exited the transport van on the roadway, 2. adequate assistance to Resident #56 relative to eating when the Resident had dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and was being physically assisted by a staff member to eat when the staff member was not trained in feeding assistance, 3. a smoking apron for Resident #72 when the facility identified the need for the Resident to wear a smoking apron when he/she actively smoked, 4. a cigarette receptacle within reach for Resident #24 which resulted in the Resident depositing cigarette ashes on the ground while he/she smoked, and 5. adequate supervision for Resident #24 when the Resident gained access to and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-16 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff had the required members of the Quality Assessment (QA) and Assurance Committee attended two of the last four quarterly meetings. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) attended, as required. Findings include: Review of the QA Committee Meeting sign-in sheets for July 18, 2022 and October 17, 2022, indicated there was no IP in attendance. During an interview on 5/16/23 at 3:59 P.M., the Administrator reviewed the QA sign-in sheets for July 18, 2022 and October 17, 2022 and said there was no IP in the facility for six months and that was why there was no IP in attendance for those meetings.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-16 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, record review and interview, the failed to ensure its staff maintained medical records that included documentation indicating that the Resident or Resident's Representative, had been provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine, declined the vaccine or was administered the COVID-19 vaccine. Specifically, the facility staff failed to document the COVID-19 immunization status for four Residents (#34, #30, #63, and#82), out of five applicable sampled residents, in a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility COVID-19 Vaccination of Residents Policy, last revised in June 2022, indicated the following: - each resident is offered the COVID-19 vaccine . - the resident or resident representative has the opportunity to accept or refuse a COVID-19 vaccine and to change his/her decision. - before the COVID-19 vaccine is offered, the resident is provided with education regarding the benefits, risks and potential side effects associated with the vaccine. - the resident's medical record includes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure its staff provided a dignified environment for one Resident (#4) out of 24 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to remove a bedpan, with feces in it, from the Resident's bed side table, that also had drinks for consumption on it. Findings include: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in March 2023. On 5/7/23 at 9:33 A.M., the surveyor observed the Resident in bed, watching TV. The bed side table had a bed pan with feces in it and a covered drink next to it, on the bed side table. The surveyor observed Staff #2 enter the Resident's room and ask the Resident which nutritional supplement drink he/she preferred. Resident #4 answered and Staff #2 left the room to get the drink. The surveyor observed Staff #2 re-enter the Resident's room and place the drink next to the bed pan. Staff #2 left the room. During an interview on 5/7/23 at 9:34 A.M., the Resident said that sometimes the bed pan was left on the bed side table for hours and he/she did not like the smell of it. During an interview on 5/9/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure its staff notified the Physician in a timely manner, of Hospice recommendations related to pain and mood management, for one Resident (#88) out of 24 sampled residents. Findings include: Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with diagnosis including acute and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the April 2023 Physician's orders indicated to admit to Hospice services on 4/12/23. Review of a Hospice Note, dated 4/27/23, indicated a recommendation to increase Ativan (anti-anxiety) to 0.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth at bedtime. Review of a Hospice Note, dated 5/2/23, indicated a recommendation to increase frequency of Morphine Sulfate (narcotic analgesic) to 5 mg sublingual (under tongue) every 4 hours (scheduled). Review of a Hospice Note, dated 5/4/23, indicated a recommendation for Ativan 1mg sublingual every 6 hours (scheduled). Review of the progress notes did not indicate any evidence that the Physician was notified of the Hospice recommendations made on 4/27/23, 5/2/23, or 5/4/23. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff completed Significant Change in Status Assessments (SCSA) for two Residents (#88 and #22) out of 24 sampled residents, when they entered into Hospice services. Findings include: 1. Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in March 2023. Review of the April 2023 Physician's orders indicated to admit to Hospice services on 4/12/23. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments indicated the SCSA was not initiated until 5/7/23. During an interview on 5/9/23 at 11:01 A.M., the MDS Coordinator said she initiated the SCSA when it was found during an audit that was done during that weekend. She said she thought the Resident had just signed on to Hospice services and if she had known the Resident was on Hospice services in April, she would have done the significant change assessment at that time. Refer to F 657 2. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in November 2014. Review of Resident #22's Nursing Progress Note, dated 1/31/23, indicated the Resident was admitted to Hospice services on 1/27/23. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff completed discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for two Residents (#59 and #46), as required, out of 24 total sampled residents. Specifically, facility staff failed to complete discharge MDS assessments for: 1. Resident #59 when he/she was discharged home from the facility, and 2. Resident #46 when he/she was discharged from the facility to another facility. Findings include: 1. Resident #59 was admitted to the facility in December 2022. Review of Resident #59's Nursing Progress Note, dated 12/30/22 indicated the Resident was discharged home with medications and belongings. Review of Resident #59's clinical record indicated no evidence a discharge MDS assessment was completed, as required. 2. Resident #46 was admitted to the facility in December 2022. Review of Resident #46's Nursing Progress Note, dated 1/12/23, indicated the Resident was discharged to a different facility that day. Review of Resident #46's clinical record indicated no evidence a discharge MDS assessment was completed, as required.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-16 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff accurately coded Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three Residents (#58, #72, and #22) out of 24 total sampled residents. Specifically, facility staff failed to accurately code: 1. Resident #58 for wandering behavior on one comprehensive MDS assessment when the Resident demonstrated wandering during the observation period while at the facility, 2. Resident #72 as having current use of tobacco on one comprehensive MDS assessment when the Resident actively smoked during the observation period while in the facility, and 3. Resident #22 as using oxygen on one quarterly MDS assessment when the Resident used oxygen during the observation period while at the facility. Findings include: 1. For Resident #58, facility staff failed to accurately code wandering behavior on one MDS assessment, dated 8/1/22, when the Resident demonstrated wandering behavior during the observation period at the facility. Resident #58 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff implemented the plan of care for one Resident (#38), out of 24 total sampled residents, relative to meal intake. Specifically, the facility staff failed to encourage the Resident to consume food, during two consecutive breakfast meals, when the Resident did not initiate self-feeding. Findings include: Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in May 2022 with diagnoses including dementia, cognitive communication disorder, and oral phase dysphagia (difficulty coordinating chewing and swallowing food placed in the mouth). Review of Resident #38's Nutrition Care Plan, initiated 8/10/22, included: Encourage greater than 50% fluid and food consumption. On 5/7/23 from 8:58 A.M. through 9:15 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #38 seated at a table in the Unit Three Dining Room. There was a three-section divided plate on the table in front of the Resident with two sections containing pureed food. There was a covered bowl of hot cereal to the right of the Resident's plate with a small, covered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff 1. reviewed the comprehensive care plan with the Resident/Resident Representative at least quarterly, for one Resident (#24), 2. and failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for one Resident (#22) after admission to Hospice services secondary to a significant change in health status, out of 24 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. For Resident #24 the facility failed to ensure its staff included the Resident/Resident Representative in the quarterly interdisciplinary team (IDT) care plan meetings. Review of the clinical record did not indicate any evidence of care plan meeting notes since 9/1/22. During an interview on 5/8/23 at 10:46 A.M., Social Worker #1 said they usually entered the care plan meeting notes in the Resident's clinical record. During an interview on 5/8/23 at 12:41 P.M., Unit Manager (UM) #2 said she could not find any care plan meeting notes since 9/1/22. She said the care plan had been reviewed but she could not provide any evidence of care plan meetings with the Resident/Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff offered a preferred activity of choice, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan, for one Resident (#4) out of 24 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure its staff offered the Resident to go outside when the Resident communicated desire to go outside. Findings include: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in March 2023. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/1/23, indicated the Resident had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a score of 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Review of the care plan for activities, initiated 4/6/23, indicated the goal was for the Resident to engage in activities of interest daily. The interventions included, but were not limited to, the following: -The Resident loves to go outside to get fresh air when the weather is good. Review of the care plan for Activities of Daily Living (ADL), with goal date of 7/17/23, indicated the Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided vision services for one Resident (#41) out of 24 sampled residents. Findings include: Resident #41 was admitted to the facility in March 2021 with diagnosis including Diabetes Mellitus. Review of the clinical record indicated the Resident signed a consent for ancillary eye care services on 3/15/21. Further review of the record did not indicate any evidence of visits from eye care services. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/7/23, indicated the Resident had no cognitive impairment as evidenced by a score of 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and the Resident had adequate vision with the use of corrective lenses. During an interview on 5/9/23 at 10:44 A.M., the Resident told the surveyor that he/she had been asking to see the Physician so he/she could get an eye exam. The Resident said his/her glasses needed to be checked. During an interview on 5/9/23 at 1:51 P.M., Unit Manager (UM) #2 said the Resident has signed up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure its staff evaluated the nutritional needs in a timely manner for one Resident (#75) out of one applicable sampled resident in a total sample of 24 residents, who was receiving oral food and feedings via gastrostomy (G-tube: an opening in the abdominal wall, made surgically for the introduction of food) tube. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure timely communication with the Registered Dietician (RD) to assess one Resident (#75) for an increase in G-tube feeding when the Resident had a history of weight loss, accepted limited food by mouth, and the Physician recommended the RD to assess the Resident for potential increase in G-tube feeding. Findings include: Resident #75 was admitted to the facility in April 2023 with diagnoses including severe protein-calorie malnutrition (an imbalance between the nutrients your body needs to function and the nutrients it gets), anorexia nervosa (an eating disorder causing people to obsess about weight and what they eat) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided care for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC-catheter that enters the body through the skin and extends into the superior vena cava, to deliver medications for extended periods of time), for one Resident (#142), out of one applicable sampled residents, in a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure its staff entered Physician orders for care and services of the PICC onto the Medication Administration Record (MAR)/Treatment Administration Record (TAR) to ensure the nursing staff implemented the care as ordered. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy for Central Venous Catheter Care and Dressing Changes, dated March 2022, indicated the following: -The purpose of this procedure is to prevent complications associated with intravenous therapy, including catheter related infections that are associated with contaminated, loosened, soiled, or wet dressings. -Perform site care and dressing change at established intervals or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided adequate pain management for one Resident (#88) out of 24 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow through, in a timely manner, with recommendations for pain management from the Hospice provider and failed to administer as needed (PRN) analgesic when pain was identified. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy for Pain, dated March 2018, indicated the following: -If a consultant is involved in managing pain, the attending physician will maintain an active role by reviewing the consultant's recommendations, addressing medical issues that affect pain, monitoring for complications related to treatment, and evaluating subsequent progress. Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with diagnosis including acute and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the April 2023 Physician's orders indicated to admit to Hospice services on 4/12/23. Review of the care plan for pain, with goal date of 7/7/23, indicated an intervention to:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff assessed one Resident (#4) out of 24 sampled residents, for the risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy for Bed Safety and Bed Rails, dated August 2022, indicated the following: -The resident assessment to determine risk of entrapment includes, but is not limited to: *medical diagnois, conditions, symptoms, and/or behavioral symptoms: *size and weight *sleep habits *medication (s) *acute medical or surgical interventions *underlying medical conditions *existence of delirium *ability to toilet self safely *cognition *communication *mobility (in and out of bed) *risk of falling Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in March 2023. On 5/8/23 at 12:29 P.M., the surveyor observed the Resident in bed, on an air mattress, watching TV, with bilateral quarter bed rails in the raised position. On 5/9/23 at 10:23 A.M., the surveyor observed the Resident in bed, on an air mattress, watching TV, with bilateral quarter bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided required Physician visits within the first 90 days of admission to the facility for two Residents (#26 and #35) out of 24 total residents sampled. Specifically, facility staff failed to ensure Residents #26 and #35 received Physician visits at least every 30 days during their first 90 days of admission to the facility. Findings include: 1. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility in June 2022. Review of Resident #26's clinical record indicated the Resident received Physician visits on: 6/11/22, 6/17/22, 6/25/22, 8/26/22, and 9/12/22. Further review of Resident #26's clinical record included no evidence the Resident received any Physician visit in July 2022, as required. 2. Resident #35 was admitted to the facility in July 2022. Review of the clinical record indicated the Resident received visits from the Nurse Practitioner on 7/19/22, 7/25/22, 8/2/22, and 8/18/22. Further review of the clinical record did not indicate any evidence that the Resident received a Physician's visit in September 2022,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff updated one Resident's (#142) paper clinical record, related to the Advanced Directive order in a timely manner, to reflect the Resident's wishes to have Cardiac Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) administered in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest, out of 24 sampled residents. Findings include: Resident #142 was admitted to the facility in [DATE]. Review of the paper clinical record indicated a Massachusetts Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST), dated [DATE], with directives that during a cardiac or respiratory arrest, Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), Do Not Intubate (DNI) and Do Not Transfer to Hospital (DNH)- unless needed for comfort). Review of the [DATE] Physician's orders indicated an Advanced Directives order for Full Code (CPR in the event of a cardiac or respiratory arrest), dated [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:25 A.M., Unit Manager (UM) #2 said the process was that if a resident coded (respiratory or cardiac…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff maintained medical records that included documentation indicating that the Resident or Resident's Representative, had been provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal vaccine, declined the vaccine or was administered the pneumococcal vaccine. Specifically, the facility staff failed to document the pneumococcal immunization status for two Residents (#76 and #63), out of five applicable sampled residents, in a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility pneumococcal vaccine policy, last revised March of 2022, indicated the following: - all residents are offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections - assessments of pneumococcal vaccination status are conducted within five working days of the resident's admission if not conducted prior to admission. - before receiving the pneumococcal vaccine, the resident or legal representative receives information and education regarding the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-16 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff completed an inspection of bed rails, to identify areas of possible entrapment, for one Resident (#4) out of 24 sampled residents. Findings include: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in March 2023. On 5/8/23 at 12:29 P.M., the surveyor observed the Resident in bed, on an air mattress, watching TV with bilateral quarter bed rails in the raised position. On 5/9/23 at 10:23 A.M., the surveyor observed the Resident in bed, on an air mattress, watching TV with bilateral quarter bed rails in the raised position. Review of the care plan, indicated an intervention for two quarter bed rails to aid in bed mobility, initiated on 4/3/23. During an interview on 5/10/23 at 9:54 A.M., the Maintenance Director said when the staff got an order for bed rails, he was the person who installed them. He said he explained the use of the bed rails to the residents, then enters a record of the installation electronically. The surveyor requested the assessment related to potential entrapment from bed rails for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-08-13 · tag F0641 — widespreadEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded to reflect the Resident's status for one Resident (#2) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the MDS failed to accurately reflect that Resident #2 was diagnosed with Anxiety Disorder and had natural teeth that were broken. Findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in May 2022, with diagnoses including Anxiety Disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety or fear that are strong enough to interfere with daily activities) and lack of coordination (a muscle control issue that makes it difficult to coordinate movements). Review of Resident #2's care plans, last revised 5/24/24, indicated: -The Resident was diagnosed with Anxiety Disorder. -The Resident was prescribed medications to manage their Anxiety Disorder. -The Resident was at risk for altered dentition related to missing and broken teeth. Review of Resident #2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EPHRAM LAHASKY — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 1.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 1.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRESUTTI, MARK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/08/2025 |
| MAJEKODUNMI, AKINDELE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225533. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.