Poet's Seat Healthcare Center
359 High Street, Greenfield, MA 01301 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 63 certified beds · (413) 774-6318 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $5,541 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-28)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.7% | 16.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.8% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.9% | 15.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.7% | 15.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.6% | 19.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.2% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.3% | 21.2% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.8% | 21.4% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 77.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.7% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.4% | 11.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.36 | 1.88 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.06 | 1.50 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 129 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 58.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.0%CMS range 46.7–61.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.2%CMS range 10.1–17.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 58.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 58.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 64.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.5–10.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 63 beds and averages 56.8 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.00 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.08 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-05-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the Provider was contacted regarding a significant change in condition relative to a medication and/or the need to alter treatment for one Resident (#13) out of a total sample of 16 residents. Specifically, for Resident #13, the facility failed to notify the Provider (Physician/Nurse Practitioner [NP]/ Physician Assistant [PA]) when the Resident's scheduled Oxycodone (short-acting opioid medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) was unavailable to be administered, resulting in increased pain and psychosocial upset for the Resident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Orders dated 2006 and revised in January 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Controlled Substance Prescriptions: >The prescriber is contacted for direction when delivery of a medication will be delayed, or the medication is not, or will not be available. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in July…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-05-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided in accordance with the individual goals for care and preferences for one Resident (#13) out of a total sample of 16 residents. Specifically, for Resident #13, the facility failed to administer scheduled Oxycodone (short-acting opioid medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) medication as ordered by the Physician, and failed to provide any other pain relieving measures, resulting in an increase in physical pain and psychological upset for the Resident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications version 2.1, dated 2001 and revised April 2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Policy Statement: >Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. >Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. >Medications are administered within one (1) hour of their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-11-02 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provide behavioral health care and services for one Resident (#26), out of 17 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to follow up on behavioral health recommendations for the Resident who was experiencing symptoms of depression. Findings include: Resident #26 was admitted to the facility in September 2021 with diagnoses including Major Depressive disorder (MDD), Anxiety disorder, and Adjustment disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 8/25/22, indicated a Behavioral Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, indicating he/she was cognitively intact. Review of a Nurses Progress Note, dated 9/29/22, indicated the following in part: -the Resident did not eat dinner or the snacks that were offered -he/she was crying incessantly and was unable to be redirected -PRN (as needed) Ativan (antianxiety medication) was given with very little affect -PRN Ultram (medication for pain) -the Resident continued to cry Review of the Psychiatric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#32) out of a total sample of 14 residents, was free from physical restraints. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #32's wheelchair brakes were unlocked while seated in a wheelchair, in front of a counter, restricting his/her ability to move freely when the Resident had a history of attempting to stand up from a seated position. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Use of Restraints, revised 4/2017, indicated the following: -Physical Restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjusted to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or restricts normal access to ones' body. -Practices that inappropriately utilize equipment to prevent resident mobility are considered restraints and are not permitted: >Placing a resident in a chair that prevents the resident from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to adequately assess the urinary status for one Resident (#12) of three applicable residents, out a total sample of 16 residents, when the Resident was admitted to the facility with an indwelling urinary catheter. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Identify the Resident's indwelling urinary catheter specifications, including size of catheter, type of catheter and size of balloon. -Obtain instructions from the Physician timely to ensure proper care for the Resident's indwelling urinary catheter, putting the Resident at risk for delays in urinary catheter care and urinary catheter associated complications. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Output, Measuring and Recording, dated 2001 and revised October 2010, indicated the following: -The purpose was to accurately determine the amount of urine that a resident excretes in a 24-hour period. -The following information should be recorded . in the resident's medical record: >The date and time the resident's urine output was measured and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and accurately documented, for one Resident (#13) out of a total sample of 16 residents, resulting in an inaccurate depiction of both pain medication administered and the Resident's pain status, and having the potential to affect the Resident's treatment plan. Specifically, for Resident #13, the facility failed to: 1. Document the administration status of scheduled doses of Oxycodone (short-acting opioid medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) in the Resident's Medication Administration Records (MAR) on 8/7/24, 11/13/24, and 11/21/24. 2. Accurately document the Resident's pain level for one assessment of pain on 5/27/25. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications version 2.1, dated 2001 and revised in April 2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Policy Statement: Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was severely cognitively impaired and had a history of disrobing in public and intrusive wandering, and (Resident #2) who was severely cognitively impaired and had a history of inappropriate touching, the Facility failed to ensure they developed and implemented a Comprehensive Plan of Care that identified goals, interventions and outcomes related to Resident #1 and Resident #2's behaviors. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated as revised March 2022, indicated a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The Policy indicated assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the resident's conditions change. Review of the Facility Policy titled Wandering and Elopements, dated as revised March 2019, indicated if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1, who was known to intrusively wander and disrobed in public areas, and Resident #2 who was known to exhibit inappropriate behaviors to residents of the opposite sex), the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2 were provided with an adequate level of staff supervision in effort to reduce the potential for a resident to resident altercation. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Wandering and Elopements, dated as revised March 2019, indicated the Facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. The Policy also indicated if identified as a risk for wandering, elopement or other safety issues, the resident's care plan will include strategies and interventions to maintain the resident's safety. Review of the Report submitted by the Facility via the Health Care Facility Reporting System (HCFRS), dated 09/25/24, indicated that on 09/23/24 at approximately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that food served to the residents was prepared in accordance with professional standards for food service and safety. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that the microwave, ovens, food mixer, and ice machine equipment in the facility's main kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, to prevent contamination and the risk of foodborne illnesses. Findings include: Review of the facility's Kitchen Sanitation and Infection Control policy, undated, included but was not limited to: -The Dietary Manager (Food Service Director) is responsible for supervising all sanitation and housekeeping procedures within the Dietary Department. -The Dietary Manager and Consultant Dietitian will develop a cleaning schedule . -A clean department is essential for good sanitation. The department includes equipment, materials that are used, floors, walls . Review of the facility's Cleaning and Sanitizing Dietary Areas and Equipment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and/or a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) were issued for two Residents (#12 and #36) out of a total sample of three residents. Specifically, the facility failed to issue: 1. A NOMNC notice and a SNF ABN notice to Resident #12. 2. A SNF ABN notice to Resident #36. NOMNC notice is issued to a resident who is receiving benefits under Medicare Part A when all covered services end. A resident must be told in advance when changes will occur in their bills, and the facility must fully inform the resident of service-related changes and appeal rights. SNF ABN notice is issued to a resident when a facility determines the beneficiary no longer qualifies for Medicare Part A skilled services and the resident has not used all his/her Medicare benefit days. The SNF ABN provides information to beneficiaries so they can decide if they wish to continue receiving skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare and the beneficiary assumes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to provide an environment that was free of accidents and hazards for two Residents (#10 and #46) out of a total sample of 15 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: 1. For Resident #10, ensure a fall event was investigated and interventions were implemented to prevent further falls for a Resident who was identified as being at risk of falling. 2. For Resident #46, provide maintenance and testing of a wander guard device (a device worn by the Resident, usually in a bracelet form, which alarms when the Resident attempts to leave a secure area of the facility) for a Resident who was identified as being at risk for elopement. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Falls-Clinical Protocol, revised March 2018, indicated the following: -The staff will evaluate and document falls that occur while the individual is in the facility; for example when and where they happen, any observations of the events etc.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the breakfast meal was served at a palatable temperature on one Unit (South Unit) out of two units observed. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: -address Resident Council concerns pertaining to meal temperatures. -ensure that breakfast meals on the South Unit were served to the residents at a palatable and appetizing temperature as indicated by test tray tasting completed for breakfast on South Unit. Findings include: During the initial survey resident interviews conducted on 3/6/23 the following information was provided by residents of the South Unit regarding meal temperatures: -Breakfast oatmeal was often cold. -Plates used to keep food warm were not warm so the meals did not stay warm and were cold when received. -The breakfast meal was cold at least once a week. Review of the 12/14/23 Resident Council Meeting Minutes indicated the Residents had a concern that food is cold upon delivery to their rooms. Review of the Activities Communication Sheet (form that provides follow-up to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidance to prevent the spread of COVID-19 on two units (North and South), out of a total of two units. Findings include: Review of the Department of Public Heath (DPH) memo titled When Caring for Long-Term Care Residents, including Visitation Conditions, Communal Dining, and Congregate Activities, Appendix A (Personal Protective Equipment Used When Providing Care to Residents in Long Term Care), dated May 10, 2023, indicated the following: -For COVID-19-positive residents: Recommended Staff PPE: Full PPE upon room entry to include fit-tested N95 respirator or alternative, and Face Shield/Goggles. Gown and Gloves if there is any contact with potentially infectious material. Gown and gloves must be changed between residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Coronavirus Disease (COVID -19) - Using Personal Protective Equipment, dated September 2021, indicated when personnel who enter the room of a resident with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 (COVID -19) infection adhere to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide education, assess for eligibility, and offer Pneumococcal Vaccinations per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for one Resident (#3), out of a total sample of five residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine, revised March 2022, indicated the following: -Prior to or upon admission, residents are assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, are offered the vaccine series within (30) days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated. -Assessment of pneumococcal vaccination status are conducted within five (5) working days of the resident's admission if not conducted prior to admission. -Before receiving a pneumococcal vaccine, the resident or legal representative receives information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal vaccine. (See current vaccine information statements at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observations and policy review, the facility failed to ensure its residents knew how to file a grievance (complaint or concern). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident and Family Concerns and Grievances Policy and Procedure, dated 2020, indicated the following: -Residents or their family members, guardians, or representative may voice a grievance to the facility staff in person, by telephone, or via written communication -The facility will notify residents, individually or through postings in prominent locations through the facility, of the right to file a grievance On 10/27/22 at 2:00 P.M., the surveyor conducted a resident group meeting with nine residents. When asked if they were aware of how to file a grievance, all nine residents stated they were unaware of where to find the grievance form, who to ask to obtain one or what the process was to file a grievance. During an interview on 10/31/22 at 7:49 A.M., the Administrator said that she was the grievance official. She said that often she will receive a complaint from a staff member…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-02 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff developed baseline care plans within 48 hours of admission and/or that the baseline care plans were provided to four Residents (#3, #29, #32 and #39) or their Representatives (if applicable), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Baseline Care Plans, revised December 2016, indicated a baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs will be developed within forty eight hours of admission. The Interdisciplinary Team will review the healthcare practitioner's orders and implement a baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate care needs . 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in February 2022. Review of the clinical record indicated no documented evidence that a baseline care plan for Resident #3 was developed within 48 hours of admission, as required. Review of the Resident's current interdisciplinary care plans indicated they were initiated in October 2022 (8 months later). Further review of the care plans indicated no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff reviewed and revised the plan of care for six Residents (#2, #3, #15, #28, #32, and #48), out of a total of 17 residents sampled. Findings include: 1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in April 2020. Review of the medical record indicated that Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were completed for the Resident on the following dates: 3/18/21, 6/10/21, 9/2/21, 11/5/21, 5/5/22, and 7/28/22. Further review of the medical record did not include any evidence that the care plan was reviewed by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment. On 11/02/22 at 2:39 P.M., the Clinical Reimbursement Nurse said there was no evidence there were any interdisciplinary care conferences were held, as required. 2. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in April 2022. Review of the medical record indicated MDS Assessments were completed on the following dates: 5/2/22, 6/11/22, and 9/8/22. Further review of the medical record did not include any evidence that the care plan was reviewed by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#3) was free from significant medication errors, out of a total of 17 sampled residents. Findings include: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in February 2022 with diagnoses including Atherosclerotic Heart Disease (build of up plaque in the walls of the arteries causing obstruction of blood flow) and Hypertension (high blood pressure/BP). Review of the 10/2022 Physician's Orders indicated the following: -obtain vital signs every shift -Hydralazine HCL (medication used to treat high blood pressure) 10 milligram (mg) tablet, give orally every 6 hours as needed (PRN) for high BP; systolic (pressure in the arteries when the heart beats) BP greater than (>) 160 and/or diastolic (pressure in the arteries when the heart rests) BP > 100 Review of the 10/2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated the following dates with elevated BPs levels meeting the criteria to receive the PRN Hydralazine: -10/15/22 on the day shift: 163/80 -10/15/22 on the night shift: 173/80 -10/16/22 on the evening shift:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-11-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff properly secured and stored prescription medication, as required. Specifically facility staff failed to 1.) keep a box of emergency medication locked up, and 2.) monitor the medication refrigerator temperatures regularly on one of two units inspected. Findings include: Review of the facility policy Storage of Medications, revised April 2019, included the following: - drugs and biologicals used in the facility are to be stored in locked compartments and under proper temperature, light and humidity controls Review of the facility's copy of insulin storage recommendations, provided by the facility's contracted pharmacy service indicated unopened insulin should be refrigerated at temperatures between 36 degrees to 46 degrees Fahrenheit. 1. During an observation and interview on 10/26/22 at 1:48 A.M., the surveyor observed a plastic box under the nursing station counter which was in full view from the left side of the nursing station. The box was secured with a thin plastic zip tie closure with a label that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that its staff stored food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility staff: 1) did not properly seal and/or label/date food when opened, 2) did not thoroughly clean areas where food and dishware was stored, 3) did not store foods off the floor, and 4) did not dispose of food that had expired. Findings include: Review of the Food Safety and Inspection Service United States (U.S.) Department of Agriculture Sanitation Performance Standards Compliance Guide, revised March 2016, indicated the following: -All food-contact surfaces, including food-contact surfaces of utensils and equipment, must be cleaned and sanitized as frequently as necessary to prevent the creation of unsanitary conditions or the adulteration (action of making something poorer in quality by the addition of another substances) of the product -Non-food-contact surfaces of facilities, equipment, and utensils used in the operation of the establishment must be cleaned and sanitized as frequently as necessary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY [NAME], [NAME] Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure its staff maintained complete, accurate and readily accessible medical records for four Residents (#15, #26, #29 and #39), out of 17 residents sampled. Findings include: 1. For Resident #15 the facility failed to maintain a complete medical record relative to a court ordered treatment plan. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses including Schizophrenia and Depression. A record review indicated an expired court ordered treatment plan dated [DATE], with a review date of [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] 4:12 P.M., the Administrator said that the social work consultant/department were typically the ones who monitor the legal information for residents. She said the treatment plan in Resident #15's chart was expired and requested more time to research the concern. During a follow-up interview on [DATE] at 8:00 A.M., the Administrator provided an updated and current treatment order. She said the current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to 1.) ensure staff reviewed their Infection Control Policies and Procedures at least annually to ensure policies and procedures are current, 2.) create written policies related to COVID-19 surveillance and symptom monitoring, 3.) implement their procedures for COVID-19 screening prior to each shift for staff, putting the facility at risk for transmission for COVID-19 within the facility, and 4.) ensure that staff monitored for signs and symptoms of COVID-19 every shift on a unit conducting outbreak testing for two Residents (#26 and #44), out of three total sampled residents, to stop the spread of COVID-19 infection. Findings include: 1. The facility failed to review their written facility wide infection prevention and control program (IPCP) annually. Review of the IPCP packet provided by the Administrator of the facility titled Managing Infections indicated no documentation that the facility staff had reviewed the packet annually. During an interview on 11/2/22 at 12:33 P.M., the Administrator said the IPCP had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure its staff protected the privacy of one Resident (#48), out of a total of 17 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility staff hung a sign containing personal information about the Resident on a wall next to his/her bed in plain view. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Quality of Life - Dignity, revised February 2020, included the following: -Staff protect confidential clinical information, for example: -Signs indicating the resident's clinical status or care needs are not openly posted in the resident rooms unless specifically requested by the resident or family member. Discreet posting of important clinical information for safety reason is permissible (e.g., taped inside a closet door). Resident #48 was admitted to the facility in October 2020 and had suffered a Cerebrovascular Accident (also known as a stroke, which occurs when the supply of blood to the brain is reduced or blocked completely, preventing the brain tissue from getting oxygen and nutrients), causing Dysphagia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff answered a call bell in a timely manner for one Resident (#54) who required physical assistance from staff, out of 17 total residents sampled. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Call Bell, undated, indicated that providing timely response to residents in need of assistance is essential to ensuring high quality resident outcomes. Resident #54 was admitted to the facility in March 2011. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 10/6/22, indicated the Resident required a one-person physical assist for transfers, and an extensive assist of one person during toilet use. During a resident group meeting on 10/27/22 at 1:46 P.M., Resident #54 said that the facility staff do not always answer call bells in a reasonable time. Resident #54 further said that he/she has waited for an hour at times. When asked how often wait times can be long, he/she replied, frequently. On 10/31/22 at 9:46 A.M., while the surveyor was seated at the South Unit Nurses' Station, a loud,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-02 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided the required transfer documentation to a receiving provider for one Resident (#28), out of a total of 17 sampled residents, putting the Resident at risk for complications and adverse events upon transfer to the receiving facility. Findings include: Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in April 2022 with a diagnosis of Adult Failure to Thrive (a syndrome of weight loss, decreased appetite and poor nutrition, often accompanied by dehydration). Review of the medical record included a Nursing Progress Note, dated 5/21/22, indicating the following: - Resident was alert with conversation, but very sleepy in between interactions. Received all current lab results during morning report with further elevated and critical sodium level of 169 (normal sodium levels range from 135-145 milliequivalent per liter (mEq/L), a condition called hypernatremia which can led to confusion, muscle twitching, seizures, coma, and death). All labs were called to the attending physician with a new order to send the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-02 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided the required notices of transfer or discharge to the Resident, his/her Representative (if applicable) and the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for two Residents (#23 and #28), out of a total of 17 sampled residents, as required. Findings include: 1. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in April 2022. Review of the medical record indicated the Resident was transferred and subsequently admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. Further review of the medical record did not indicate any evidence that the required notice of intent to transfer or discharge the Resident was provided to the Resident and/or his/her representative and the Ombudsman, as required. During an interview on 11/1/22 at 1:15 P.M., Social Worker (SW) #1 said whenever a resident goes out to the hospital, they or their responsible party should receive an intent to transfer/discharge notice as well as a bed hold notice. She further said the only time she completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-02 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided the required notices of bed-hold policy and return to the Resident and/or their Representative (if applicable) for two Residents (#23 and #28), out of a total of 17 sampled residents, as required. Findings include: 1. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in April 2022. Review of the medical record indicated that Resident #28 was transferred and subsequently admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. Further review of the medical record did not indicate any evidence that the required notice of bed hold policy and return was provided to the Resident and/or his/her representative, as required. During an interview on 11/1/22 at 1:15 P.M., Social Worker (SW) #1 said whenever a resident goes out to the hospital, the resident and/or his/her responsible party should receive a notice of bed hold policy and return. She further said it is the Receptionist's responsibility to issue these notices. During an interview on 11/1/22 at 1:20 P.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-02 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff completed Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments timely, as required, for two Residents (#1 and #3), out of a total of 17 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in February 2022. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident #3 was hospitalized on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Further review of the clinical record indicated a Comprehensive MDS Assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/20/22, was in progress. Sections C (Cognitive Patterns), D (Mood) , E (Behavior), Q (Participation in Assessment and Goal Setting), S (Massachusetts State Specific) and V (Care Area Assessment Summary) were not completed. During an interview on 11/02/22 at 10:56 A.M., the Clinical Reimbursement Nurse said that once a resident was admitted to the facility, the facility staff have 14 days to complete and lock the Comprehensive MDS Assessment. He said that Resident #3 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff accurately coded the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments for two Residents (#34 and #44), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Findings include: 1. For Resident #34, the facility staff failed to accurately code the Comprehensive MDS Assessment relative to 1.) antipsychotic medication (used to treat psychosis and other psychotic disorders) administered, 2.) a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR- stepwise tapering of medications), and 3.) his/her dental status during the assessment period. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in June 2019. Review of the Dental Care Plan, initiated on 4/17/22, indicated Resident #34 had no natural teeth or dentures and was edentulous (without teeth). Review of the Physician's Orders indicated that the Resident was prescribed Olanzepine (antipsychotic medication) 2.5 milligrams (mg) daily at bedtime from 3/31/22 until 8/9/22 when it was discontinued. Review of the 9/2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated there were no prescribed antipyschotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff developed and/or implemented the plan of care for three Residents (#2, #28 and #48), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Findings include: 1. For Resident #2, the facility failed to ensure the staff implemented the plan of care relative to obtaining weekly weights as per the Physician's Orders. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in April 2020. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/5/22, indicated the Resident had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 out of 15 and required extensive assistance of two staff with transfers. Review of the Dietitian's Note, dated 6/13/22, indicated Resident #2 had a 14 pound (lb.) weight loss over a two month period. Review of the Physician's Orders, dated 6/14/22, indicated an order to weigh the Resident weekly for health monitoring. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 6/2022 through 10/2022 indicated the Resident's weight was not obtained weekly as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided resident treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#44), out of a total of 17 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided a daily dressing change as ordered by the Physician. Finding include: Resident #44 was admitted to the facility July 2021. Review of the facility policy titled, Dressings, Dry/Clean, dated September 2013, indicated the following: -verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure -review the resident's care plan, current orders, and diagnosis to determine if there are special resident needs. -check the treatment record Review of the Order Summary Report, dated 11/2/22, indicated the Resident had a skin tear to his/her left outer aspect of the calf with a Physician's Order to cover the Steri-strips (a wound closure tape put across a wound to keep the edges together) with a non-stick dressing daily and as needed (PRN) until resolved. Review of the care plan, initiated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-02 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided necessary foot care and treatment for one Resident (#36), out of a total of 17 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to offer podiatry (a branch of medicine devoted to the study, diagnosis and treatment of foot problems and conditions related to the lower legs) services resulting in overgrown toenails and pain when wearing footwear. Review of the facility policy titled, Foot Care, revised March 2018, indicated the following: - Residents will receive appropriate care and treatment in order to maintain mobility and foot health. - Residents will be provided with foot care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility in March 2022. Review of the current Physician's Orders included the following: - May see podiatrist, dentist, audiologist and ophthalmologist, initiated 3/25/22 - Monitor second toenail left foot every shift, initiated 10/23/22 Review of the medical record did not include evidence that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided services relative to limited range of motion for one Resident (#28), out of a total of 17 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to assess and treat a contracture (a shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other her tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints), to his/her right hand and wrist, putting him/her at risk for increased contractures and pain. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in April 2022 with a diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy (a group of disorders that affect movement and muscle tone and can cause stiff muscles with exaggerated reflexes (spasticity), stiff muscles normal reflexes (rigidity) and variations in muscle tone, such as being too stiff or too floppy (mayoclinic.org)). Review of the Resident's Care Plan did not include evidence a plan of care was developed relative to the limitations in his/her range of motion or contracture. Review of the Nursing Evaluations, dated 4/25/22, 6/7/22, and 9/7/22, did not include evidence the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the environment remained free of accident hazards relative to smoking for one Resident (#23), out of a total of 17 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Smoking Policy and Procedure, dated 2020, indicated that the residents were not permitted to have any smoking paraphernalia in their room or on their person and that all smoking paraphernalia should be given to the nursing staff for safe keeping Review of the Resident Smoking List provided by the facility indicated that Resident #23 was an independent smoker. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 6/26/22, indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating he/she was cognitively intact. During an interview on 10/26/22 at 9:52 A.M., Resident #23 said that he/she holds onto his/her lighter and cigarettes because cigarettes are expensive, and the facility had lost them before. Review of the Smoking Care Plan, initiated on 7/18/22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff provided appropriate care and services for an indwelling urinary catheter (a device placed into the bladder to allow urine to drain) for one Resident (#32) out of 17 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to 1) ensure the Resident had a urology consultation as scheduled and 2) obtain appropriate Physician's Orders for urinary catheter care. Findings include: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility September 2022 with a diagnosis of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (enlargement of the prostate gland that can cause urinary difficulty). 1. Review of the Progress Notes indicated Resident #32 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE] with a new diagnosis of a bladder mass. Review of the hospital discharge instructions, dated [DATE], indicated the Resident was to follow-up with the Urologist (a doctor who specializes in treatment of the urinary system) on 10/25/22. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician and/or Nursing staff addressed pharmacy recommendations timely for two Residents (#3 and #48), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Regimen Review (MRR), dated 8/2020, indicated that the consultant pharmacist performed a comprehensive review of each resident's medication regimen and clinical record at least monthly and all findings were reported to the Director of Nursing (DON), the Attending Physician, the Medical Director, and the Administrator or in accordance with facility policy. The policy also included the following: -recommendations were acted upon and documented by the facility staff and/or prescriber -the prescriber accepts and acts upon recommendations or rejects and provides an explanation for disagreeing. -the DON or designated licensed nurse address and document recommendations that do not require a physician intervention 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in February 2022. Review of the clinical record indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-02 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain lab work as ordered by the Physician for one Resident (#34), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Lab and Diagnostic Test Results- Clinical Protocol, revised 11/2018, indicated the following: - the physician will identify and order diagnostic and lab testing based on the resident's diagnostic and monitoring needs -the facility staff will process test requisitions and arrange for tests -the laboratory, diagnostic radiology provider, or other testing source will report the testing results to the facility Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in June 2019. Review of the clinical record indicated a Physician's Order dated 3/22/22 to obtain the following lab work for Resident #34: -Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), -Complete Blood Count (CBC), -Vitamin B12 level, -Liver Function Tests (LFTs), -Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP), and -Depakote Level Review of the Resident's clinical record indicated no documented evidence that the lab work was completed as ordered by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-02 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff assisted one Resident (#34) with the process for obtaining dentures, out of a total sample of 17 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dental Services, revised December 2016, indicated that routine and emergency dental services were available to meet the resident's oral health service in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in June 2019. On 11/01/22 at 12:27 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #34 seated in the Dining Room with other residents during the lunch meal. The Resident was feeding him/herself lunch which consisted of cut up meat, mashed potatoes and diced carrots. The surveyor observed that the Resident was edentulous. Review of the 10/2022 Physician's Orders indicated an order initiated on 3/24/22 for the Resident to have dental services as needed (PRN). Review of the Dental Care Plan, initiated 4/17/22, indicated Resident #34 was at risk for difficulty chewing related to his/her edentulous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff maintained a medical record that included documentation that residents were offered and received the pneumococcal immunization (a vaccine used to prevent possible life-threatening pneumonia) and/or did not receive the pneumococcal immunization for two Residents (#21 and #26), out of a total of five sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine, revised October 2019, indicated the following: -Assessment of pneumococcal vaccination status will be conducted within five (5) working days of the resident's admission if not conducted prior to admission. -Before receiving a pneumococcal vaccine, the resident or legal representative shall receive information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal vaccine .Provision of such education shall be documented in the resident's medical record. -Residents/representative have the right to refuse vaccination. If refused, appropriate entries will be documented in each resident's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-02 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1.) Develop a COVID-19 vaccination policy for its residents, and 2.) Maintain a medical record that included documentation that residents were offered and received and/or did not receive or refused recommended COVID-19 vaccinations for two Residents (#21 and #31) out of a total of five sampled residents. Findings include: 1. The facility failed to create written policies to address COVID-19 vaccination for residents. During the survey entrance conference on 10/26/22 and on multiple occasions on 11/1/22 and 11/2/22 the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Respiratory Therapist (the staff at the facility who were over seeing COVID-19 within the facility) were asked to provide a COVID-19 resident vaccination policy and no policy was ever provided to the surveyor. On 11/2/22 at 12:33 P.M., the Administrator said the facility had not developed any policies related to COVID-19 vaccinations for residents. 2. For Residents #21 and #31 the facility failed to document in the Resident's medical records whether the Residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-11-02 · tag F0888 — isolatedEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview the facility failed to ensure staff developed written policies related to COVID-19 vaccination for its staff. Findings include: During the survey at the entrance conference on 10/26/22 and on multiple occasions on 11/1/22 and 11/2/22 the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Respiratory Therapist (the staff at the facility who were over seeing COVID-19 within the facility) were asked to provide a COVID-19 staff vaccination policy and no policy was ever provided to the surveyor. On 11/2/22 at 12:33 P.M., the Administrator said the facility had not developed any policies for COVID-19 staff vaccination.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to accurately assess the urinary status on one comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for one Resident (#12) of three applicable residents, out of a total sample of 16 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to accurately code the Resident's comprehensive MDS Assessment to indicate that the Resident had an indwelling urinary catheter when the Resident was admitted to the facility with a chronic indwelling urinary catheter, putting the Resident at risk of not receiving urinary catheter care as required. Findings include: Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in July 2024, with diagnoses including retention of urine and obstructive and reflux uropathy. Review of Resident #12's Hospital Discharge/Transfer note, dated July 2024, indicated the following: -The Resident had a chronic indwelling Foley catheter. -The Resident was treated for urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of Resident #12's admission Summary Note, dated July 2024, indicated the following: -The Resident arrived at the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-03-11 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — widespreadHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, policy, and record review, the facility failed to implement smoking policies as required for one Resident (#49) out of one applicable Resident, out of a total sample of 15 residents, and also failed to ensure that the Resident smoking area was maintained in a safe, clean and sanitary manner. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: 1. For Resident #49, ensure that smoking assessments and Resident Agreement for safe smoking habits were completed quarterly as required. 2. Establish a cleaning schedule to empty the cigarette disposal receptacles timely and replace a missing cigarette disposal receptable cover to prevent accidental fires and/or burns and unsafe disposal of cigarette butts on the ground in the smoking area. Findings include: 1. Resident #49 was admitted to the facility in September 2022 with diagnoses of nicotine dependence and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease that causes obstructed airflow and breathing problems). Review of the facility policy titled Smoking Policy and Resident Agreement, undated, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$5,541 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $5,541 — penalty dated 2025-05-28
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EPHRAM LAHASKY — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 1.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 1.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.0 | +2.0 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| THOMPSON, EDIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/08/2025 |
| HOROWITZ, AKIVA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/21/2020 |
| LAHASKY, EPHRAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/21/2020 |
| VIADERO, JOSEPH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225360. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.