No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Chapel Hill Nursing Center

4511 Robosson Road, Randallstown, MD 21133 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 63 certified beds · (410) 922-2443 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0606) — cited Jan 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$13,247 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Jan 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (64) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $13,247 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-16)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
203 Bryan Way Ste A · (443) 354-8006 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
9818 Liberty Rd · (410) 698-9068 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion2.2 mi
9910 Liberty Rd · (410) 496-4788 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4515 Deer Park Rd · (410) 887-1163 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased34.4%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight19.1%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%0.5%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.3%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.1%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%2.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened31.2%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.0%16.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.1%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers11.1%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.9%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.9%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.0%80.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.7%21.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.0%9.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.801.331.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.741.201.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.0%CMS range 24.9–59.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 6.6–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting79.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened19.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.4–11.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.051.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.06
RN hours/ resident / day
0.62
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.04
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.77
RN hoursweekends
65.1%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 63 beds and averages 46.9 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.06 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.17 to 0.77 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

21
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-30)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

64 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 52 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2020-02-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medication according to professional standards of nursing, monitor the administration of medication to residents and crush medications according to standards of nursing practice. This was evident during the observation of staff putting medication in resident food and not monitoring when the resident gets the medication, who gives the medication and how much of the medication the resident receives and if the appropriate staff administered the medication. Resident #11's ten medications were left unattended on his/her tray and Resident #13's five medications were left unattended. Both medications were administered by a geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) and incorrectly crushed. This was found during the observation of medication pass for 2 of 2 residents observed (Residents #11 and #13). The observations of the medication pass with LPN #4, interviews with staff and their failure to verbalize and identify the safe and proper way to ensure medications were administered to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the investigation of the facility reported incident, review of medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the specified number of staff support needed when providing care for residents. This resulted in the resident falling out of the bed and suffering a left acute frontal subdural hematoma, which required surgery. This was evident for 1 (Resident #264) out of 9 residents reviewed for accidents during the Medicare/Medicaid recertification survey. The findings include: The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score is a number between 0 and 15 that indicates a person's cognitive health: 13-15 points: The person's cognition is intact; 8-12 points: The person has moderate cognitive impairment; 0-7 points: The person has severe cognitive impairment. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is administered to all residents upon admission, quarterly, yearly, and whenever a significant change in an individual's condition occurs. It is a standardized assessment tool to comprehensively evaluate a resident's health status, functional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards for food service safety was followed. This was evident for 1 of 1 facility kitchen, and 2 of 2 units observed during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include:During the surveyor's initial tour of the facility on 3/23/26 at 7:43 AM the surveyor observed an open cart sitting in the Unit 1 nursing hallway which contained a glass ice water dispenser with a rope handle sitting on the top tier of the cart. The second tier of the cart was observed to have a dirty food tray with dirty dishes and wilted lettuce with orange liquid present on it protruding out of the cart sitting directly next to an open sleeve of unused cup lids. On the bottom tier of the cart, another dirty food tray was observed with an open container with yellow food matter and a plastic cup holding cream colored liquid.On 3/23 at 7:43 AM the surveyor observed a tray of snacks sitting on top of a nursing treatment cart located in the Unit 1 hallway with snacks on it. The snacks were felt by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in good repair. This was evident for 2 of 2 Nursing units and 1 out of 1 dining area reviewed during the annual recertification survey and investigation of complaints; #2713655, #320969, and #320969.The findings include: 1. During the surveyor's initial tour of the facility on 3/23/26 at 7:43AM the surveyor observed that the supply of linens present on the nursing unit 1 hallway was low in quantity. On 3/23/26 at 2:06PM the surveyor conducted a review of Complaint #320969 which included a concern for delays in Resident incontinence care. On 3/23/26 at 3:29PM the surveyor reviewed Complaint # 2713655 which included a concern that bed linens were not changed regularly, and Residents of the facility were left without clean bedding. At this time, the surveyor conducted an interview of the complainant who reported a concern that the facility did not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-30 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain discharge documentation, ensure the local Ombudsman was notified of the facility's discharges and transfers, and provide the resident/representative with written notification of transfers to the hospital and written notification of the facility's completed bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital. This was evident for 4 (#42, #8, #50, #52) of 5 residents reviewed for transfers and discharges during the annual recertification survey.The findings include: 1. On 03/25/26 at 6:52 AM, Resident #11's medical record was reviewed. During the medical record review, the surveyor could not locate documentation indicating that the local Ombudsman's office was notified about Resident #42 being transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. On 03/25/26 at 9:37 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator Staff #1 was interviewed. During the interview, the surveyor asked Staff #1 whether the facility notifies the local Ombudsman's office…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-30 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure handrails were firmly affixed. This was evident for 2 out of 2 nursing units during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include:During the surveyor's initial tour of the facility on 3/23/26 at 7:43AM handrails were observed on Unit 1 of the facility to be in worn condition with chips, splintering, holes, and with areas present where the wood's surface finish had worn off.On 3/30/26 at 2:55PM the surveyor conducted rounding of the nursing units and observations of all handrails of the facility. Three handrails were observed and felt by this surveyor to be loose and movable, with one being located on the Main Unit 1 hallway, one being located in the hallway connecting Units 1 and 2, and one located in the Unit 2 hallway. The surveyor shared concerns and conducted rounding with Director of Maintenance #22 who observed and acknowledged the surveyor's concerns.Concerns were again shared with the facility's Administrator, Director of Nursing, Administrator in Training #10, and Regional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the promotion of resident's dignity and residents' rights. It was evident for 2 (#14, #61) out of 4 residents reviewed for Resident Rights during this annual recertification survey.The findings include:1.On 3/23/2026 at 8:30 AM, during the initial observation of Resident #14, an observation was made that the urinary catheter bag was hanging from the bed without a bag cover.On 3/24/2026 at 12:35 PM, an observation was made by the surveyor, and it was noted that Resident #14 had a bag cover over the urinary catheter bag.On 3/26/2026 at 2:43 PM, the surveyor observed that while Resident #14 was lying in bed, once again the resident's urinary catheter bag was not covered. The cover for the bag was lying on the floor next to where the urinary catheter bag was hanging.The facility failed to maintain Resident #14's dignity by not covering the urinary catheter bag.2. On 3/26/26 at 11:30 AM, a review of the facility-reported incident revealed that the facility failed to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's representative's rights were being upheld. This was evident for 1 (#61's representative) out of 1 resident representative reviewed during this annual recertification survey.The findings include:On 3/26/26 at 11:30 AM, a review of the facility-reported incident revealed that the facility failed to ensure that resident rights were being upheld. The facility conducted a thorough investigation into the alleged neglect claim that the facility was not feeding Resident #61. However, the facility denied the resident's right and the resident representative's right to remain on the phone with the resident while being fed. On 3/26/26 at 2 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA #1) and Director of Nursing (DON #2) were interviewed in reference to a complaint from the resident's family about the incident that had occurred. When asked what had happened, the DON responded that the Resident #61 was on the phone with his sister (Resident #61 Representative) and mother when it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the recommendations and suggestions of residents were addressed and reported back to the residents. This was evident for 6 out of 6 concerns sent to the facility from the resident council. The findings include: On 3/25/2026 at 2:04 PM, the surveyor observed a resident council meeting in the main dining hall area. The meeting was initially scheduled for 2 PM; however, the Activities Aide who facilitates the meeting needed to change the time from 2 PM to 4 PM. Residents had been notified by word of mouth from facility staff that it was going to be at 4 PM. The surveyor spoke with the Resident Council President (Resident #9), who stated that they prefer their meeting earlier in the day, like around 11 AM, before lunch. Resident #9 did not know the reason that the meeting had been changed to 4. After the surveyor was finishing up speaking with the Resident #9, the Activities Aide (AA, Staff # 28) came into the room and stated they had changed the meeting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to indicate the facility's per diem rate for services no longer covered under Medicare/Medicaid as well as the reason why Medicare/Medicare is no longer covering those services on the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (CMS-10055) form. This was evident for 3 (#3, #5, #64) of 3 residents reviewed during the annual recertification survey for beneficiary notification.The Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (CMS-10055) form is a required document used by Medicare-certified skilled nursing facilities to notify Medicare beneficiaries that their Part A services may not be covered because they are not considered medically reasonable/necessary or are deemed custodial. The notice provides an estimate of costs for the services and the reasons why Medicare is not expected to pay.The findings include:On 03/27/26 at 1:18 PM, the surveyor reviewed the CMS-10055 forms provided by the facility for Residents #3, #5, and #64. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the assessments were accurately completed. This was determined for 1 (#14) out of 6 residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments during this annual recertification survey.The findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 is a standardized, federally mandated clinical assessment tool used in Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes to evaluate residents' functional capabilities, health needs, and preferences. It drives care planning, monitors quality, and determines reimbursement rates. Assessments are required at admission, quarterly, annually, and upon significant changes.On 3/27/2026 at 3:11 PM, during record review, it was revealed that Resident #14 had an error on the MDS assessment. Resident #14 has an ostomy, but it wasn't checked on the assessment that the resident had one. The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA #1) was asked for a copy of the MDS - Section H for Resident #14. On 3/27/2026 at 3:30 PM, the surveyor asked the NHA #1 for an interview with the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans. This was evident for 2 (#50, #2) of 6 residents reviewed for care planning during an annual recertification survey and investigation of Complaint #2784382.The findings include: 1. On 3/23/26 at 2:39PM the surveyor conducted a review of Complaint #2784382 and conducted an interview of the complainant relating to an injury sustained by Resident #50. On 3/26/26 at 11:46AM the surveyor conducted an interview of the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) at which time the surveyor inquired as to how Resident #50's injury occurred at which time the DON responded: (Resident #50) ran into his/her bed with his/her wheelchair and got a skin tear or laceration on his/her leg, there was no issues with the bed, it was him/her running into the bed, s/he had a motorized wheelchair assessed by therapy at that time. On 3/26/26 at 12:01PM the surveyor reviewed Resident #50's medical record with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 52 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a person-centered care plan was updated and revised. This was evident: for 2 (#50, #63) out of 3 residents reviewed for care plan revisions during the annual recertification survey and investigation of complaint #320972.A care plan is used to summarize a person's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments and outlines what needs to be done to plan, assess, and manage care. Care plans are developed, reviewed, and/or revised by the IDT after the completion of a comprehensive MDS assessment (Admission, Annual, Quarterly, Significant Change) to help to evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care while in the facility. Maryland Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) is a form which includes medical orders for emergency medical services or other medical personnel regarding CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and other life-sustaining treatment options. Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews with a resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident attended a scheduled medical appointment and the missed appointment was rescheduled timely. This was evident for 1(Resident #45) out of 2 residents investigated for communication/sensory during the annual recertification survey.The findings include:On 3/23/2026 at 12:24PM, during an interview with Resident #45, the Surveyor was informed that the resident missed a scheduled follow-up eye appointment on 2/27/2026 because the facility did not schedule transportation. The resident stated that the Appointment Scheduler (AS) #31stated that she would ensure that his/her appointment is rescheduled immediately, but he/she had not received any information regarding the rescheduled appointment.On 3/24/2026 at 1:00PM, a review of Resident #45 electronic medical record failed to reveal an order for a follow-up eye appointment.On 3/24/2026 at 1:54PM, during an interview with AS #31, the Surveyor was informed that she was unaware of Resident #45's follow-up eye…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee personnel files and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure required Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) performance reviews were completed every 12 months. This was evident for 2 (GNA #15 and GNA #37) out of 5 employees reviewed for sufficient staffing during the annual recertification survey.The findings include:On 3/30/2026 at 12:15PM, a review of GNA #15's personnel file failed to reveal that the facility conducted a yearly performance review at least every 12 months.On 3/30/2026 at 12:30PM, a review of GNA #37's personnel file failed to reveal that the facility conducted a yearly performance review at least every 12 months.During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/30/2026 at 2:20PM, the Surveyor the Surveyor expressed the concern that the facility failed to complete yearly performance reviews for GNA #15 and GNA#37. During a review of GNA #15's and GNA #37's personnel files, the DON confirmed that no yearly performance review was conducted at least every 12 months. The DON did not conduct any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure:1. Medications were securely stored, this was evident in 1 out of 2 medication carts observed on the Unit 1 hallway during the facilities recertification survey.2. Nutritional supplements were not expired. This was evident in 2 of 2 storage areas for Nepro nutritional supplements observed during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include:1. During the surveyor's initial tour of the facility on [DATE] at 7:43AM the surveyor observed an unattended and unlocked medication cart on the Unit 1 hallway in which all drawers were found to be accessible containing various Resident medication pill packs, bottled medications and medical supplies.On [DATE] at 7:47AM the surveyor requested and conducted a dual observation of the concern with Nurse #26 who after surveyor intervention, was observed locking the medication cart. The surveyor conducted an interview at this time with Nurse #26 and inquired as to what staff was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed. This was evident for 1 out of 1 lunch meal tray pass observation conducted by the surveyor during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: On 3/30/26 at 12:13PM Food Protection Manager (FPM, Staff #5) informed the surveyor that a new tray will be made from scratch for Resident #33 whose food was left exposed in the hallway. FPM #5 reported that because there was no more lasagna, Resident #33 would receive something different.On 3/30/26 at 12:14PM the surveyor conducted an interview of FPM #5 and inquired as to why the menu of lasagna being served for the lunch meal did not follow the facility's posted menu reviewed by the surveyor. During the interview FPM #5 reported that the prime rib posted on the menu was not served because it was not available for order when they went to order the food on Thursday. FPM #5 confirmed that Residents were not notified of the menu substitutions prior to the meal being served.On 3/30/26 at 12:43PM the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0839 — isolated
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of an employee file, online sources, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) staff had an active, current certification. This was evident for 1 (GNA #15) out of 5 GNAs reviewed for staff qualifications during the annual recertification survey.The findings include: On [DATE] at 11:30AM, a review of staffing sheets from [DATE] through [DATE] revealed that GNA #15 worked on a resident care assignment on the following days:[DATE]: 3:00PM-11:00PM and 11:00PM-7:00AM [DATE]: 3:00PM-11:00PM and 11:00PM-7:00AM[DATE]: 3:00PM-11:00PM and 11:00PM-7:00AM[DATE]: 3:00PM-11:00PM and 11:00PM-7:00AM[DATE]: 3:00PM-11:00PM and 11:00PM-7:00AM[DATE]: 3:00PM-11:00PM and 11:00PM-7:00AM[DATE]: 3:00PM-11:00PM and 11:00PM-7:00AM[DATE]: 3:00PM-11:00PM and 11:00PM-7:00AM[DATE]: 3:00PM-11:00PM and 11:00PM-7:00AM[DATE]: 3:00PM-11:00PM and 11:00PM-7:00AM[DATE]: 3:00PM-11:00PM and 11:00PM-7:00AM[DATE]: 3:00PM-11:00PM and 11:00PM-7:00AM[DATE]:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. This was evident for 1 (Resident #18) out of 2 residents reviewed for communication/sensory during the annual recertification survey.The findings include:On 3/26/2026 at 2:15PM, a review of Resident #18's electronic medical record failed to reveal a personal inventory sheet.On 3/26/2026 at 2:20PM, a review of Resident #18's paper chart failed to reveal a personal inventory sheet.On 3/26/2026 at 2:23PM, during an interview with Registered Nurse #34, the Surveyor was informed that if a resident has personal belongings, they should be logged on a personal inventory sheet located in the resident's paper chart.A review of the facility's Personal Property policy on 3/27/2026 at 2:50PM, #10, revealed that The resident's personal belongings and clothing are inventoried and documented upon admission and updated as necessary. A copy of the personal inventory sheet should be maintained in the residents'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure clean linen was handled, transported, and stored in a safe and sanitary manner. This was evident for 2 of 2 clean linen transports, and 1 of 1 main supply room observed during the annual recertification survey.The findings include: 1. On 3/25/2026 at approximately 9:30 AM, the Surveyor observed Laundry Staff #33 carrying clean, uncovered resident garments on hangers while walking up the facility steps. The garments draped over the laundry staff member's arm. On 3/27/2026 at approximately 8:30AM, the Surveyor observed Laundry Staff #20 transporting an uncovered, yellow clean linen cart with folded facility linen on Unit 1 and then down the freight elevator. On 3/27/2026 at 12:55PM, during an interview conducted with Environmental Services/ Laundry Manager #19, the Surveyor expressed the concern that a laundry staff member was observed carrying clean, uncovered Resident garments on hangers and in their arms as they walked up the facility steps and another laundry staff member was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure maintenance of essential kitchen equipment. This was evident during the surveyors review of the kitchen task during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: On 3/23/26 at 7:58AM the surveyor conducted an initial tour of the facility's kitchen.On 3/23/26 at 7:59AM the surveyor observed the digital exterior thermometer on Freezer #3 to be reading: 110. On 3/23/26 at 8:00AM the surveyor observed the warming plate base in the warmer was observed to have food debris present on the surface.On 3/23/26 at 8:01AM the surveyor observed food cooking equipment located on the clean cooking utensil rack with a layer of food debris and clear liquid present on it. On 3/23/26 at 8:02AM the surveyor observed a rectangular bucket of cloudy liquid sitting beneath the dishwasher's filter container and drain. The drain stopper used for containing water used for washing of dishes was observed to be disconnected from the machine. On 3/23/26 at 8:04AM the surveyor observed the three compartment sink…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure effective pest control to ensure the environment was free from gnats. This was evident in 1 of 2 units, and 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for effective pest control during the annual recertification survey.The findings include: 1. On 3/23/2026 at 8:17AM, during an initial tour of Unit 2, the Surveyor observed the shared bathroom of Resident #19 and Resident #45. The bathroom had a musty odor and there were flying gnats observed in the shower area. On 3/24/2026 at 8:30AM during a tour of Unit 2, the Surveyor observed flying gnats at the nurses' station and in the hallway. On 3/25/2026 at 9:30AM, during an interview conducted with Resident #28, the Surveyor observed flying gnats in the room. The resident mentioned the facility had an issue with gnats. On 3/26/2026 at 1:34PM, during an interview conducted with the Director of Maintenance (DOM) #22, the Surveyor was informed that the facility utilizes [Pest Control Company] and an employee was in the building on 3/23/2026 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of employee files and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an in-service training program to consistently evaluate each Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) based on individual performance of mandatory education and clinical skills competencies of no less than 12 hours per year. This was evident for 4 (GNA #15, GNA #35, GNA #36, and GNA #37) out of 5 employee files reviewed for sufficient staffing during the annual recertification survey.The findings include:On 3/30/2026 at 12:15PM, a review of employee personnel files for GNA #15, GNA #35, GNA #36, and GNA #37 failed to reveal annual mandatory in-service and clinical competency of no less than 12 hours completed in the last 12 months. The Surveyor expressed the concerns to Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and requested documentation to verify the individual performance of mandatory education and clinical skills competencies for GNA #15, GNA #35, GNA #36, and GNA #37.On 3/30/2026 at 1:30PM, the NHA provided the Surveyor with copies of GNA #15's, GNA #35's, and GNA #37's 2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with the facility staff, it was determined that the dietary staff 1) Failed to maintain the temperature logs on the refrigerator and freezer, 2) failed to date and label foods stored in the refrigerator and freezer with expiration dates and, 3) failed to put on beard covers while handling the resident's food. These were identified during 2 out of 4 observations of kitchen food service operations during the recertification survey and has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: 1) On 01/08/25 at 08:28 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen, the surveyor observed that the temperature logs on the doors of the refrigerator (1 and 2) and freezers (1 and 2) were not charted from 01/04/2025 - 01/06/2025. The Dietary Manager Staff #12 stated that the temperature logs were not completed because they were short staff during those days. The copies of the temperature logs were requested for and provided to the surveyor. On 01/09/2024 at 07:58 AM, during a follow-up visit to the kitchen, surveyor observed that the temperature logs on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0943 — widespread
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide evidence that all nursing staff had received education on abuse, neglect, and exploitation training annually. This was evident for 6 (nurse #11, #28, #38, and Nurse Aides #35, #39, and #40) of 6 nursing staff training records reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 1/15/25 at 11:29 AM, the surveyor reviewed randomly selected six nursing staff ( nurse #11, #28, #38, and Nurse Aides #35, #39, and #40) employee files for their training records from 2022 to current. The review revealed that a Registered Nurse ( RN #11) was hired in June 2019, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #28) was hired in January 2023, and LPN #38 was hired in May 2022. There was no abuse, neglect, and exploitation training for all of them. Also, the Geriatric Nurse Aide #40 (hired in September 2017), #39 (hired in March 2019), and #35 (hired in January 2023) did not have any training records for abuse, neglect and exploitation annually. During an interview with the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and an interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the environment of resident care was kept clean, comfortable and safe for resident use. This was evidenced by the floor radiator heater in the bathrooms observed with significant damage, rust build up along the floor radiator heaters, end caps were not in place which exposed sharp edges. This was evident for 2 of 5 bathrooms observed during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 01/08/25 at 01:45 PM it was observed that the bathroom floor radiator heater in rooms 36/38 (they are adjoining rooms and share a bathroom) had no cap at the end of it. Two sharp rusted edges were exposed and sticking out. A resident using the bathroom could potentially cut their leg on the rusted sharp edges. Two long flat metal pieces were also observed leaning on the wall in the bathroom for rooms 36/38. The two long pieces of metal were leaning on the wall from floor to ceiling opposite the toilet and sink. These two long metal pieces were not secured to the wall. The paper towel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolated
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of a facility reported incident, record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility administration failed to ensure that a background check was done to protect residents from abuse, neglect, and theft. This was evident for 4 (Staff #26, # 46,# 47, and #48) of 9 employees reviewed for abuse during the re-certification survey. The findings include: 1) On 1/10/2025 at 2:05 PM the Director of Human Resources, Staff #25, was interviewed and asked if GNA #26 had a background check in their employee file. On 1/10/2024 at 2:40 PM Staff #25 was not able to provide a background check for GNA #26 after they reviewed the paper employee records and the electronic employee records. On 1/13/2025 at 8:00 AM Staff #25, the Director of Human Resources was asked again if GNA #26 had a background check in their employee file. Staff #25 replied no, I do not have any paperwork or documentation that showed GNA #26 had a background check during her employment here. 2) On 1/13/2024 at 8:15 AM the Administrator provided their facility reported incident (FRI) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility records, Medical records, and interview with staff it was determined that the facility staff failed to immediately report an allegation of suspected resident abuse. This was evident for 1 (#37) of 15 residents reviewed for self-reported incidents during this recertification survey. The findings include: A facility self-reported incident involving Resident #37 was reviewed on 1/9/2025 at 11:01 AM. It was indicated that an allegation of abuse was reported on 12/19/2024 by the ombudsman during a care plan meeting. The family of Resident #37 reported to the ombudsman that a GNA (Geriatric Nursing Assistant), GNA #29, threw a positioning wedge pillow at him. Further review of the facility's investigation packet revealed that it had the following timelines documented: -The alleged incident occurred on 12/15/2024 at 8:45 PM -Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was notified of the incident on 12/16/2024 -NHA interviewed Resident #37 on 12/17/2024 -NHA interviewed GNA #29 on 12/17/2024 -Ombudsman reported the incident at the Care Plan Meeting on 12/19/2024 -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, facility investigation review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) thoroughly investigate a resident's allegation of unknown origin of injury, 2) educate all staff to prevent similar elopement episodes in the future, and 3) thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse, and provide documentation for the incident of an allegation of abuse. This was evident for 3 (Resident #30, #23, #19) of 36 residents reviewed during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) A review of the facility's self-reported incident, MD00187097, on 1/09/25 around 10 AM revealed that Resident #30 was found with a bruise on his/her left flank and coccyx on 12/28/22. The facility investigated this incident as an unknown origin of injury through staff interviews, hospital follow-ups, and ADL (Activities of Daily Living) evaluations. However, there was no documentation for other residents' interviews. On 1/09/25 at 1:05 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). The NHA stated that the facility staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing about the bed hold policy when the resident was transferred/discharged from the facility to an acute care facility. This was evident for 1 (resident #51) of 2 residents reviewed who were transferred to an acute care facility during the recertification survey. The findings include: Review of the medical record for resident #51 on 01/14/25 at 11:25 AM revealed that resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was sent to an acute care facility on 11/05/24 for a change in his/her medical condition. Further review of the medical record failed to produce written evidence that the resident and /or the resident representative were given written notice of the bed hold policy. The facility's documentation on eINTERACT transfer form reveals Bed hold policy was not sent. The bed hold policy was provided during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for one (Resident #257) of three residents reviewed for smoking during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each Residents' strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure that each Resident receives the care they need. A portion of the investigation into a facility-reported incident, MD00185418, on 1/13/25 at 10:00 AM revealed that Resident #257 was found smoking in the room on 11/09/2022. The facility staff confiscated the Resident's smoking materials, and an evaluation and audit were conducted. The surveyor reviewed Resident #257's medical records on 1/13/25 around 1 PM. The review revealed that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to revise the interdisciplinary care plans to meet the resident's needs. This was evident for 2 ( Resident #30, #13) of 9 residents reviewed for abuse and 36 residents reviewed for for care plan timing and revision during the survey process. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. The interdisciplinary team meets and develops care plans once the facility staff completes a comprehensive resident assessment. Care plans provide direction for individualized care of the resident. A care plan flows from each resident's unique list of diagnoses and should be organized by the resident's specific needs. The care plan is a means of communicating and organizing the actions and assuring the resident's needs are attended to. The care plan is to be reviewed and revised at each assessment time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a functional communication system for a non-English speaking resident (Resident # 51). This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for communication, including language and other functional communication systems, during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 01/08/25 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor attempted to interview resident # 51 in his/her room. The resident was not able to answer questions, except for occasional response of yes .yes. On 01/08/25 at 9:15 AM, during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff # 42, when asked what language resident #51 speaks and how he/she communicates, Staff #42 stated, Resident # 51 doesn't speak English, and he/she speaks only Russian, but he/she can express what he/she wants with basic sign language. During business hours, an employee from another department helps when needed, but off hours and weekends, we have to call the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and resident and staff interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that the dependent resident's personal hygiene needs were adequately met by offering and providing showers as scheduled. This was evident for 1 (Resident #37) of 2 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: During an interview with Resident #37 on 01/09/25 at 11:43 AM, when the surveyor asked the Resident if he got showers, the Resident stated Heck no. when asked if he would like a shower, he said Yes. On 1/13/2025 at 11:50 AM, an interview was conducted with a Geriatric Nurse Aide (GNA #35) who stated that when residents refused a shower, the GNAs would let the nurse know and document the refusal in the Electronic Health Record. GNA #35 stated that Resident #37 refused showers in the past, and had been getting bed baths. A record Review was conducted on 1/13/2025 at 1:16 PM revealed: -Order for shower and Skin Check 7-3 Shift Tuesday and Friday, written on 12/20/2024 at 07:00 AM.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that facility staff failed to communicate and document a concern about a resident with a contracted dentist prior to tooth extraction which resulted in a resident having gum bleeding after the tooth extraction. This was evident for 1(Resident #264) out of 4 complaint investigations reviewed during the Medicare/Medicaid recertification survey. The findings include: On 01/13/2025 at 9:09 AM, review of intake MD00200513 showed that a complainant had stated that on July 29, 2024 their loved one, who was a resident at the facility, had a dental procedure (tooth pull) and his/ her blood-thinner medication was not held prior to the procedure which caused a trip to the emergency department due to excessive bleeding. On the same day at 9:14, the surveyor reviewed the electronic health record of the resident and it revealed the following: 1. Health Status Note on 7/27/2024 at 13:17 Note Text: Alert and verbal, no distress noted. was seen by a Dentist today. SBAR progress note on 7/27/2024 at 21:38 Note Text: The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the medical record and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to monitor a resident's significant weight changes. This was evident for 1 (#37) of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: On 1/08/2025 at 1:44 PM, a review of Resident #37's medical record revealed, in a weight tracking system report, Resident #37's weight was documented as 187.2 Lbs. (pounds) on 04/08/2024 and 6/18/2024 Resident #37's weight was documented as 166.5 lbs., which was a 20 lbs weight loss. Further review of Resident #37's medical record revealed a note from the dietician, staff #50 on 5/16/2024 that the resident refused weight, noted with failure to thrive in adult, swallowing difficulty, speech more remote/ slurred, and needs 100% support with meals. However, there was no documentation from a physician that he/she was aware of Resident #37's weight loss, nutritional status, or weight management. The weight log was as follows:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure that the use of high-risk psychotropic medication was necessary and justified when staff failed to complete behavior monitoring documentation and utilization of nonpharmacological interventions before administering Anxiolytic medication for the resident (#13). This concern was evident for 1 (Resident #13) of 2 residents reviewed for utilization of unnecessary medication during the recertification survey. The findings include: Resident #13's medical record was reviewed on 01/10/25 at 11:06 AM and revealed that the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #13 was receiving an anxiolytic medication (Ativan) for the diagnosis of Anxiety. On 01/10/25 at 11 AM, a medical record review revealed that an initial order from 12/15/23 for Ativan Tablet 0.5 MG every 12 hours as needed for anxiety was placed for 14 days. The order was renewed to manage resident behaviors on 01/02/24 for 14 days, 01/22/24 for 14 days, and 02/19/24 for 14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and the staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications, as evidenced by failing to ensure that medication was properly labeled and dated. This was evident in two of the two medication rooms and one of the two refrigerators observed during the recertification survey. The findings include: On [DATE] at 12:48 PM, the surveyor checked the refrigerator in Units 1 A and B and noted two opened resident-specific insulin vials. Vial one was opened on [DATE], and vial two was opened on [DATE]. Per the facility's medication labeling and storage policy, Multi vials that have been opened or accessed are dated and discarded within 28 days. On [DATE] at 12:50 PM, the Surveyor checked the supplies along with the Licensed Practical Nurse(LPN) # 45 at Unit 2 A and B medication storage room and noted an expired spill kit (Econo kit). The kit expired on [DATE] and contained a scoop, a red bag, and gloves. The surveyor also noted three Condom catheter packs (Ref…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of resident's immunizations records, and interviews with residents and facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) prevent infection in a resident with an indwelling catheter and failed to protect the resident's dignity, 2) perform Tuberculosis screening on all admissions, and 3)ensure that medication administration methods were free from contamination in a manner that minimized the potential spread of infection. This was evidenced by 2 residents (Residents #57 and #207) of 36 residents reviewed during the recertification/complaint survey, and a Registered Nurse (RN) (Staff#43), not sanitizing hands between residents during medication administration during this recertification/complaint survey. 1) On 01/08/25 at 12:21 PM during an initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed that Resident #207's Foley bag was seen on the floor in a pillowcase. LPN staff#6's attention was called to see resident Foley's bag. When she was asked what was used to cover the Foley bag, she stated that it was a pillowcase and stated that she was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview with facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) received education about residents' safety and residents' care after an alleged abuse incident. This was found to be evident for two Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA #10 and #37) out of 7 GNAs' reviewed for training records reviewed during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: 1)On 01/09/25 at 12:48 PM, a review of GNA #10's employee file revealed that she was hired in July 2023. However, there were no training records for residents' safety and transfer mobility seen for the employee upon hire date and afterward. On 01/09/25 at 12:54 PM, in an interview with the Director of Nursing DON, when she was asked about the training process upon hire, she explained to the surveyor that the education/skills packets are given to the employees, and they take the packets to the employee who is orienting them, and the signed/completed skills packets are put in the new employee file. When she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation during an initial tour of the facility and an interview with the resident, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain and enhance the dignity of the resident (Resident #37). This occurred in 1 of 6 sampled residents. The findings include: During observations rounds on 2/11/20 at 9:39 AM Resident #37 was noted with a dried yellow sticky substance on the floor next to his/her chair near the bathroom door. While this surveyor was walking in the resident's room a sticking sound could be heard. The resident stated, that is dried urine on the floor, sometimes I don't make it to the bathroom. On 2/13/20 at 1:24 PM during a follow-up interview with the Resident #37, the resident's room floor again was noted with a dried yellow sticky substance throughout the floor. The resident was also noted with a bandage to the right knee. When asked what happened? The resident stated, I fell while coming out of the bathroom [ROOM NUMBER] days ago. I sometimes don't make it to the bathroom…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews with the resident and the facility staff, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #90 had an alternative method to wash his/her hands secondary to a resident wheelchair not being able to fit through the bathroom door. This is evident for 1 of 6 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: During an interview with Resident #90 on 2/12/20 at 10 AM, s/he stated, I would like to wash my hands in the bathroom, but my wheelchair will not fit through the door. Review of Resident #90's medical record on 2/13/20 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility 02/2020, with a diagnoses that included Paraplegia, depression and Bipolar Disorder. During interview with the Acting Director of Nursing (ADON) and the Administrator on 2/14/20 at 11 AM, the ADON stated, the residents' wheelchair is longer than the average wheelchair and wipes can be supplied to the resident for handwashing. During a follow-up interview with Resident #90 s/he stated, the wipes were given to him/her by Nurse #6.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-19 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview with facility staff and the resident it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident receives his/her packages unopened. This was evident for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #7) reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: During an interview with Resident #7 on 2/11/20 at 12:24 PM s/he stated, the social worker opens my packages before me receiving them. On 2/12/20 at 2 PM during an interview with the Social Worker she stated, she has opened the resident packages to ensure that the resident can have what is being delivered. She was informed by this surveyor that the resident was concerned about this. The Social Worker stated, it would not happen again.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with the facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide notice to residents informing them that Medicare may deny payments for procedures or treatments and that residents may be personally responsible for full payment. This was evident in 3 of 3 residents (Resident #33, #243 and #24) reviewed during beneficiary protection notification. The findings include: Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) is a written notice from Medicare, given to residents before receiving certain items or services notifying beneficiaries that Medicare may deny payment for that specific procedure or treatment. An ABN gives residents the opportunity to accept or refuse the items or services and protects them from unexpected financial liability in cases where Medicare denies payment. 1. On 2/19/2020 at 11:58 AM Resident #33's Beneficiary Protection and Notification task was conducted. This review revealed that the last covered day for skilled nursing facility services for the resident was 1/17/2020, further review revealed that the facility failed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a safe, functional, and comfortable environment for residents. This was evident for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #7 and #37) reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. During a tour of the facility on 2/11/20 at 9:39 AM, upon entering Resident #37's room, occupied by one resident, there was a very strong odor of urine that lingered. The room was noted with a dried yellow sticky substance on the floor next to his/her chair near the bathroom door. While this surveyor was walking in the resident's room a sticking sound could be heard. The resident stated, that is dried urine on the floor. 2. During a tour and interview with Resident #7, on 2/11/20 at 12:24 PM, the surveyor observed that the resident had several boxes in his/her room near the window, behind the boxes were mice droppings. The resident stated, I hear the mice every night rambling through my stuff. The Administrator was made aware of the resident concern and this surveyor's observation. The Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the state regulatory office. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 15) that was reviewed for general skin condition during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. Findings include: An observation was made on 2/11/10 at 8:40 AM of Resident #15 who was in his/her bedroom in the bed. The resident was noted to have an abrasion to the left arm. Review of the Resident #15's medical record on 2/14/20 revealed the resident was admitted with the following but not limited diagnosis; Stiffness of Right and Left Shoulder, Age-related Osteoporosis. Review of a care plan initiated on 9/19/19 revealed that the resident had a history of wandering and listed as an intervention: Staff will continue to monitor and re-direct the resident. An interview was conducted with the Nurse# 13 assigned to unit one on 2/18/20 at 1:55 PM and she was asked about resident's bruise and she stated that the resident wanders at times and that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation for a resident injury with an injury of unknown origin. This was found to be evident for 1 resident (Resident #15) reviewed for abuse during the facility's annual survey. Findings include: During the facility's annual survey on 2/11/20 at 8:40 AM, Resident #15 was observed in his/her bedroom with an abrasion to the left arm. Review of the resident's medical record on 2/14/20 revealed the resident was admitted with the following but not limited diagnosis: Stiffness of Right and Left Shoulder, Age-related Osteoporosis. Further review of a care plan initiated on 9/19/19 revealed the resident had a history of wandering and listed as an intervention: Staff will continue to monitor and re-direct the resident. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident was observed by the nurse on 1/11/20 at 10:50 AM with his/her shoulder bent moderately to the right side while walking. X-Ray results indicated Resident #15 had an Anterior Inferior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-19 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure residents or their responsible party, received written notification of a transfer to the hospital, including appeal rights and Ombudsman contact information. This was found to be evident for 3 out of 3 residents (Residents #20, # 240 and #22) reviewed for hospitalization during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: 1. On 2/14/2020 at 9:39 AM review of Resident #20's medical records revealed the resident had been discharged to the hospital on 1/5/2020. Review of the medical records revealed a Nursing Home to Hospital Transfer form revealing that the Responsible Party (RP) was called and made aware of the transfer. Further review of the form failed to reveal documentation that the transfer/discharge information was mailed to the RP nor did it have information about the resident's appeal rights or Ombudsman contact. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Corporate Nurse on 2/14/2020 at 12:30 PM, they both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-19 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure that residents or residents' responsible party (RP) were given written notification of the facility bed-hold policy when they were being transferred out of the facility to a hospital. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 3 residents (Residents #20 and #240) reviewed for hospitalization during the survey investigation. The finding includes: 1. Resident #20's medical records were reviewed on 2/14/2020 at 9:39 AM and revealed that the resident had been discharged to the hospital on 1/5/2020. Further review of the medical records revealed a Nursing Home to Hospital Transfer form revealing that the RP was called and made aware of the transfer. Further review of the form failed to reveal documentation that a copy of the facility bed-hold policy was sent with the resident or mailed to the RP. Review of the facility Nursing Policy and Procedure on Discharge/Transfer documentation that is sent with the resident to the hospital includes the following:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, interviews with family and staff it was determined the facility failed to: 1.) review and update the care plan in relation to the resident's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan based on the resident's current status and needs or include family preferences for dining and getting out of bed or follow the interventions for bladder incontinence and 2.) revise a care plan to specify how frequent staff is to monitor a resident who is at risk for falls. This was evident for 2 of 21 residents (Resident #32 and #21) reviewed for care plan updates during the survey investigation. The findings include: ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) refer to daily self-care activities such as eating, toileting, grooming and dressing. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1. During an interview with Resident #32's family member on 02/11/2020 at 2:26 PM he/she stated he/she and my sisters attend care plan meetings and they do a lot of talking about the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, tour of the facility, medical record review as well as review of other pertinent documentation and interview of facility staff it was determined the facility failed to: 1.) provide a safe and hazard-free environment for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #37) reviewed for accidents and 2.) ensure a resident at risk for falls received increased monitoring by staff according to the care plan interventions (Resident #21). This was found to be evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for falls during the facility's annual survey. The findings include: 1. During observations rounds on 2/11/20 at 9:45 AM Resident #37's room was observed with a fall mat near the window with white board strips 3 feet by 8 feet L shaped nailed to the floor around it. During an interview with the Administrator on 2/13/20 at 10 AM he stated,the prior Maintenance Director was asked to remove the wood strips, however, he quit before removing them. During an interview with the interim Maintenance Director on 2/13/20 at 10:30 AM, he stated, the facility is in the process of removing the wood strips. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-19 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff it was determined that a facility physician failed to sign monthly orders timely and when the physician first visited the resident when the orders were written. This was evident during the medical record review of Resident #2. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 on 2/13/2020 at 10:30 AM revealed that after the resident's December 2019 hospitalization and monthly record turnover was completed the January 2020 orders were printed out from the pharmacy dated 1/2/2020. The turnover and order process was confirmed with Staff #6 on 2/13/2020 at 11:47 AM. The Physician #30 signed the orders on 1/28/2020 although the orders were acted on and implemented all through January 2020. A review of the physician notes and visits with Resident #2 revealed that Physician #30 saw Resident #2 on multiple occasions prior to 1/28/2020, including on 1/7/2020, however, did not sign the orders until 1/28/2020. This concern was reviewed with the Director of Nursing on 2/13/2020 at 4:39 PM.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-19 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have a completed psychiatric consult on the chart and further provide additional psychiatric services to a resident due to a resident's payor source. This was evident during the review of 1 of 5 residents (Resident #13) for unnecessary medications. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 on 2/18/2020 5:18 PM revealed the resident was just re-admitted to the facility after an incident of noted aggression towards other residents and staff. The medical record documented that the resident had a diagnoses including unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, mood disorder due to known physiological conditions with manic features and altered mental status. Resident #13's attending physician noted on the resident's history and physical that Patient currently on 2 antipsychotics and not likely benefiting from both with potential for more side effects. Per the history and physical after an initial consultation with behavioral services, the Haldol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility pharmacist failed to identify and act on a medication irregularity. This was identified during the review of 1 of 1 resident (Resident #14) reviewed for insulin usage. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 on 2/12/20 at 5:16 PM revealed diagnosis of insulin dependent diabetes. The resident was also ordered Lantus a long acting insulin at different doses twice a day. Resident #14, according to the physician notes and medication administration records (MAR) reviewed on 2/12/2020 was monitored by glucose checks daily. According to the weekly results of the glucose checks the resident's insulin would be adjusted. On 11/21/2019, the Nurse Practitioner #8, saw Resident #14 and recommended decreasing his/her nightly Lantus dose from 10 units to 7 units. According to the MAR however, the resident's daytime dose of Lantus that was at 30 units was discontinued and 7 units was added to the nighttime regime for a total of 17 units given via 2 injections. NP #8 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow physician orders by discontinuing the wrong diabetic medication on a resident that was dependent on insulin. This was identified during the review of 1 of 1 resident (Resident #14) reviewed for insulin usage. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 on 2/12/20 at 5:16 PM revealed diagnosis of insulin dependent diabetes. The resident was also ordered Lantus, a long acting insulin at different doses twice a day. Resident #14, according to the physician notes and medication administration records (MAR) reviewed on 2/12/2020 was monitored by glucose checks daily. According to the weekly results of the glucose checks the resident's insulin would be adjusted. On 11/21/2019, the Nurse Practitioner #8 saw Resident #14 and recommended decreasing the nightly Lantus dose from 10 units to 7 units. According to the MAR however, the resident's daytime dose of Lantus ordered for 30 units, was discontinued and 7 units was added to the nighttime…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and medical record review it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications and maintain an error rate of less than 5% by following physician orders. This was evident during the observation of medication pass completed by 1 licensed nurse during the administration of 26 medications, in addition to administration of 5 medications that were observed for a total of 31 medication opportunities that resulted in 10 errors for an error rate of (32%) for Resident #11 and Resident #13. The findings include: Surveyor completed an observation of a medication pass on 2/12/2020 at 7:48 am with LPN #4. During the observation of the medication pass, LPN #4 pulled the medications from the medication cart for Resident #11 and reviewed the medications with the surveyor. According to the physician orders a medication that was ordered, Divalproex was ordered as Delayed Release (for depression). LPN #4 stated that she was crushing all the resident's medication and that a certain Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) would give the medication as the resident would not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to follow physician orders and promptly identify a medication error involving diabetic medication for a resident that was dependent on insulin for daily functioning. This was identified during the review of 1 of 1 resident (Resident #14) reviewed for insulin usage. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 on 2/12/20 at 5:16 PM revealed diagnosis of insulin dependent diabetes. The resident was also ordered Lantus, a long acting insulin at different doses twice a day. Resident #14, according to the physician notes and medication administration records (MAR) reviewed on 2/12/2020 was monitored by glucose checks daily. According to the weekly results of the glucose checks the resident's insulin would be adjusted. On 11/21/2019, the Nurse Practitioner #8 saw Resident #14 and recommended decreasing the nightly Lantus dose from 10 units to 7 units. According to the MAR however, the resident's daytime dose of Lantus ordered for 30 units, was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with the facility staff it was determined the facility staff failed to store foods properly in the dry storage area. This was found to be evident during an initial tour of the facility conducted during the facility's annual survey. The Findings include: An initial tour of the main kitchen was conducted on 2/11/20 at 7:25 AM with the Food Service Director present. The main kitchen was noted with water pouring from the ceiling with a gray trash can under the leak to catch the water. The wall in the dry storage room across from the kitchen was observed with water stains and peeling drywall and paint. Additional observation revealed there were multiple food items stored on the shelf that were outdated and identified as follows: Seven expired thickened cranberry thickeners dated 12/25/18 One apple thickener dated 7/18/19 One orange juice honey consistency dated 7/19/19 One pomegranate Berry flavor thickener dated 12/10/19 On 2/14/20 at 7 AM during observation of the breakfast tray line the cart that contained the lids for the plate trays for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to: 1.) maintain accurate documents related to the care of resident (Resident #37) and 2.) provide documentation that a resident was monitored for aggressive behaviors and was sent for an evaluation for those behaviors according to the resident care plan (Resident #13). This was found to be evident for 2 of 24 residents (Resident #37 and #13) reviewed during the facility's annual survey. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #37's medical record on 2/13/20 at 11 AM revealed a Medication Management assessment dated [DATE] by CRNP (Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner) for Med Option Psych services which indicated the resident was receiving Klonopin 0.5 mg every morning for anxiety and Trileptal 300 mg two times a day for seizures. Klonopin is a sedative used to treat seizures, panic disorder, and anxiety. Trileptal is an Anticonvulsant that can be used for seizures. Continued review of the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to: 1.) ensure that each resident or responsible party (RP) received education regarding benefits and risk and document that the residents or the responsible party were provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza and pneumococcal immunization prior to administration. This was evident for 4 residents (Resident #23, #25, #21 and #28) reviewed for immunization. The findings include: On 2/18/2020 the facility influenza and pneumococcal immunization policy and procedure was reviewed and revealed the following: The resident or RP will sign the consent/declination for after receiving education regarding the immunization. Review of Resident #23, #25, #21 and #28's medical records revealed all residents listed had orders for influenza vaccination and for the Pneumococcal 13-[NAME] Conj Vacc Suspension inject 0.5 milliliter intramuscularly one time. Further record review revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation during the initial tour it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests. The findings include: During an observation tour and interview with Resident #7 on 2/11/20 at 12:24 PM, the surveyor observed that the resident had several boxes in his/her room near the window and behind the boxes were mice droppings. The resident stated, I hear the mice every night rambling through my stuff. The Administrator was made aware of the resident concern and surveyor observation. The Administrator placed sticky traps in the resident's room and contacted Ecolab the pest control company used by the facility. On 2/12/20 during an interview with Resident #90 at 10 AM, s/he stated state, a mouse comes to visit my room every night. Several mice dropping were noted under the resident's bed. During an interview with the Administrator on 2/13/20 at 1 PM, he stated, Ecolab pest control comes in monthly. I will notify them. On 2/14/20 at 10 AM, the Administrator reported to this surveyor that mice were caught…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-19 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of facility reported incidents and further review of employee records, including interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have documentation that Geriatric Nursing Assistance's (GNA) were given annual abuse training. This was evident during the review of 3 of 4 employee records reviewed (Staff # 16, #17 and #18). The findings include: Interview with the Human Resources Director (HR) #15 on 2/18/2020 at 11:30 AM to review the employee files provided to the survey team, revealed that for Employee #16, #17 and #18 there was no trainer reviewed and dated proof that the training documentation in the files related to annual training of abuse, neglect and exploitation. Within the employee's files was paperwork that the HR Director #15 stated was proof of training. It was a type of post-test that was not reviewed by anyone that the employees would receive after they were given an in-service related to abuse. HR Director #15 stated that after the in-service they discuss what was in the in-service and give the employees a paper to sign…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-19 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of facility reported incidents and further review of employee records, including interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have documentation that Geriatric Nursing Assistance's (GNA) were given in-service training related to abuse and dementia care upon hire. This was evident during the review of 1 of 2 new employee records reviewed (Staff #16). The findings include: Interview with the Human Resources Director (HR) #15 on 2/18/2020 at 11:30 AM to review the employee files provided to the survey team, revealed that for Staff #16 there was no training provided to the employee for 2019 related to required abuse, neglect and dementia care when the employee was hired. Within the employee's file was paperwork that the HR director stated was proof of training. It was a type of post-test that was not reviewed by anyone that the employees would receive after they were given an in-service related to abuse. HR Director #15 stated that after the in-service they discuss what was in the in-service and give the employees a paper to sign and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2020-02-19 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents and or visitors were aware of where the state inspection results were located. This was found to be evident during observations during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. Findings include: A resident council meeting was conducted on 2/12/20 at 11:26 AM by the state survey team with several residents who reside at the facility. The residents in attendance were (Resident #16, #22 and #36) and they were asked the following question: Without having to ask, are the results of the state inspection available to read? Resident #22 replied that the previous owner would let the residents know what the facility passed after the state inspection was completed. Resident #22 further stated that s/he was unsure where the survey results were located. Residents #16 and #36 both agreed that the previous owner went over the state inspection results and that they were unaware of the location of the survey results. An observation was made on 2/12/20 at 1:30 PM and at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$13,247 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $13,247 — penalty dated 2025-01-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EPHRAM LAHASKY — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.1+1.9 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 53.0-2.0 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BSD 26 HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/01/2019
JONES, LAVERNIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/01/2019
WASSO, SUSANIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/01/2019
BIDERMAN, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2019
GIBERSTIEN, BARUCHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2019

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$989K
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 88%Medicare 8%Other / private 4%

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $989K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$386per resident / day
operating cost
$11,740per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$364per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215220. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next