No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Calvert County Nursing Ctr.

85 Hospital Road, Prince Frederick, MD 20678 · For profit - Corporation · 149 certified beds · (410) 535-2300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$11,190 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $11,190 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-17)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
110 Hospital Rd Ste 111 · (410) 414-2778 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
110 Hospital Rd · (410) 535-3838 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
930 Costley Way · (410) 414-7105 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Hallowing Point Rd · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased30.7%20.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.2%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.5%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.1%1.5%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%22.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained1.0%0.0%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.7%2.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened38.2%22.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.2%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.8%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.7%5.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.2%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.7%13.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine56.9%80.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.1%21.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.7%9.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.641.331.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.921.201.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 336 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 115 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.5%CMS range 49.4–58.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 7.9–12.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge68.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened9.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.7–9.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.69
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.57
RN hoursweekends
58.2%
Total nursing turnover
58.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 149 beds and averages 104.1 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-26)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-17)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to transfer Resident #417 using a sit to stand transfer device that resulted in the resident sustaining a fracture to their right arm. This was identified a G of past non-compliance for facility reported incident MD00210322 for F689. This was true for 1 out of the 29 residents reviewed during this survey. The findings include: 1) Based on reviews of medical records, administrative records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide a resident with a safe environment, during a transfer from the bed to the wheelchair. Review of Resident #417's fall prevention care plan initiated on 8/11/2024 revealed Resident #417 was at high risk for falls. A review of Resident #417's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date of 4/20/24 Quarterly, was conducted. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a complete assessment of the resident which provides the facility with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical observations and staff interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide nursing care within the standards of practice. This was evident for 4 (Residents #78, # 43, #83, and #15) out of 6 residents reviewed during the recertification and complaint survey process.The findings include: The administration of supplemental oxygen and prescribed nebulizer treatments to a resident, as ordered by a physician, to maintain adequate oxygen saturation and support respiratory function. Equipment, including oxygen tubing and humidifier bottles, is expected to be clean, dated, and labeled. Nebulizer masks and tubing are expected to be clean, dated, labeled, and stored in a clean plastic bag when not in use.On 03/22/2026, during Southern Shore unit rounds, surveyor observations revealed multiple unlabeled respiratory supplies as follows: at 7:50 AM, Resident #78 in bed with oxygen tubing in place; humidifier bottle empty and unlabeled; at 7:55 AM, oxygen tubing and nebulizer tubing on Resident #43's nightstand, unlabeled; at 8:10 AM, Resident #83 in bed with oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 1) Residents' immunization status was verified and 2) current vaccinations were offered. This was found to be evident for 4 (Resident #30, #45, #2, and #49) out of 5 Residents reviewed for infection control during the recertification and complaint survey. The findings include: Tuberculosis (TB) is a contagious, airborne bacterial infection primarily caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which usually attacks the lungs but can affect other body parts like the brain or spine. It is preventable and curable yet remains a leading cause of death worldwide.According to Centers for Disease and Prevention (CDC) nursing home residents must undergo tuberculosis (TB) screening upon admission to identify latent or active infection, typically using a two-step tuberculin skin test (TST/Mantoux) or a single IGRA blood test. A two-step test is generally required, with the second step performed 1-3 weeks after the first. Influenza (the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that geriatric nursing assistants (GNA) received at least 12 hours of in-service training annually. This was found to be evident for 5 (GNA #18. #19, #20, #21 & #22) out of 5 GNA's reviewed for training. The findings include:During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 03/25/2026 at 9:13 AM she reported the Director of Nursing (DON) handles training for staff.During an interview with the Director of Nursing on 3/25/2026 at 9:46 AM he reported education is completed throughout the year for GNA's via in-services and educational sheets. He reported the GNA's should be receiving 12 hours of mandatory training yearly. During a review of the training records for GNA's #18, #19, #20, #21 and #22 on 3/25/2026 at 11:45 AM it was discovered the records provided by the staffing manager were competency checkoff sheets and tests that had been completed by the GNA's. There was no documentation confirming the GNA's had 12-hours of annual training.During an interview with the DON on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of a complaint, staff interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the provision and use of a motorized wheelchair to promote and maintain the resident's independence and freedom of movement. This was evident for 1 (Resident #65) out of 1 resident reviewed during the recertification and complaint survey process. The findings include:A motorized wheelchair (power wheelchair) is a battery-operated mobility device used to assist residents with limited strength, endurance, or mobility. It is typically operated by the resident using a hand control and is intended to promote independence, safe mobility, and the resident's ability to move about the facility.On 03/26/2026 at 7:45 AM record review during the complaint investigation was conducted, Resident #65 reported that the motorized wheelchair has been nonfunctional since 2025. The resident stated that a vendor completed measurements for repair or replacement; however, no follow-up has been received regarding the status of the equipment. The resident further reported that the lack…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were offered written information regarding advance directives. This was evident for 4 (Resident#6, # 10, 89, and #90) out of 6 residents reviewed for advance directives during the recertification and complaint survey process. The findings include:An advance directive is a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for healthcare, that is completed by a resident to outline their preferences for medical care in the event they are unable to make decisions for themselves.In a long-term care facility, an advance directive guides staff and providers in honoring the resident's choices regarding treatment, life-sustaining measures, and designation of a representative to make healthcare decisions on their behalf, in accordance with the resident's rights.On 03/23/2026 at 9:05 AM medical record review revealed no documentation to indicate that the facility provided information or education regarding advance directives to Residents #6, #10, #89,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Resident was free from abuse. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #6) out of 4 Residents reviewed for abuse during the recertification and complaint survey. The findings include: During an interview conducted on 03/22/26 at 9:35 AM, Resident #6 reported that Agency Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #16 provided rough care. The Resident reported that the GNA roughly pulled the Resident by the neck and arm and was very rude while repositioning the Resident in bed. During a review of Facility Reported Incident (FRI) #2736958 investigation conducted on 03/24/26 at 7:00 AM it was discovered that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) determined that Agency GNA #16 abused Resident #6. The NHA suspended the GNA at the onset of the investigation. At the conclusion of the investigation the NHA notified the staffing agency of the abuse and placed the GNA on the do not return list. During an interview conducted on 03/24/26 at approximately 9:30 AM the NHA reported that during the investigation 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #118) reviewed for ADL care.The findings include:Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) are defined as basic self-care tasks, including bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, eating, and personal hygiene, that are necessary to maintain a resident's health and well-being.On 03/23/2026 at 12:34 PM, this surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #118's family member, who reported concerns that the resident's ADL care was not being carried out on 11/09/2025.On 03/23/2026 at approximately 1:00 PM, this surveyor conducted a record review of Resident #118's electronic health record. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), completed on 10/03/2025, revealed the resident was assessed as dependent for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, shower/bath self, upper body dressing, lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Resident was free of accidents. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #2) out of 1 Resident reviewed for accidents during the recertification and complaint survey. The findings include: During an interview conducted on 03/22/2026 at 8:46 AM, Resident #2 reported that during incontinent care Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #7 raised the bed to a high position and rolled the Resident on their right side. The GNA told the Resident that she needed to get a washcloth and that she would be right back. The GNA left the Resident on his/her right side and the bed in a high position. The Resident reported that he/she rolled off the bed onto the floor and hit his/her head. The Resident reported that he/she was not injured. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 is a standardized, federally mandated assessment tool for nursing home residents, implemented by CMS to improve care quality. It collects comprehensive data on functional, cognitive, and health status (e.g., mobility, pain, medications) at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to store medications to ensure medications remained safe and effective. This was evident for 1 (Western [NAME] Unit) out of 3 Refrigerators used for medication storage.The findings include:During an observation of the medication storage refrigerator on the Western [NAME] Unit on 3/23/2026 at 10:09 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #11 it was observed that the medication storage refrigerator was at 64 degrees Fahrenheit. The refrigerator had several medications stored inside that included insulin: Mounjaro autopens, Lispro autopens, Humulin 70/30 autopens, Lantus; suppositories: Acetaminophen and Bisacodyl; and Tuberculosis Purified Protein Derivatives (PPD).During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #11 on 03/23/2026 at 10:09 AM she reported night shift checks the refrigerator temperatures and records them in a log nightly.During a review of the Refrigeration Monitoring Quality Assurance Record log…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-03-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to have a medication error rate of less than 5% during the medication observation facility task. This was evident for 2 medication errors out of 37 opportunities which resulted in a medication error rate of 5.41%.The findings include:1. During an observation of Certified Medication Aide (CMA) #10 on 3/23/2026 at 8:49 AM she completed her medication administration to Resident #83.During a review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #83 on 3/23/2026 at 8:56 AM it was discovered that the Resident also had an order to receive eye drops that had not been given. The order was for Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium Ophthalmic Liquid (Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium (Ophth)) Instill 1 drop in both eyes four times a day for dry eyes on drop in each eye four times a day.During an interview with CMA #10 on 3/23/2026 at 8:58 AM she reported that she had given all the medications due to Resident #83 at that time and advised that she didn't see an order for eye drops for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served on sanitary pans, dishes and utensils. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 1 commercial dishwasher observed during the recertification and complaint survey. The deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents who consume liquids and food. The findings include: 3-bay Compartment Sinks maintains proper sanitization. Each sink bowl (bay) serves a different role, one for rinsing, washing, and sanitizing. During an observation conducted on 03/22/26 at 8:49 AM, the Surveyor observed Dietary Aide #13 rinsing silver metal pans in the 3-bay compartment sink. The Surveyor observed one bay with water, the bay for washing and sanitizing was empty. The Surveyor asked why the other 2 bays weren't filled, the Dietary Aide replied that he was rinsing the pans before placing them in the dishwasher so there was no need to fill the other 2 bays. Center of Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) requirements for hot water dishwashers in facilities like nursing homes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee consisted of the minimum required members. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. This was identified during the QAPI/QAA facility task during the annual/complaint survey.The findings include:On 03/26/2026 at 10:11 AM, the Administrator provided the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) binder for review. The Administrator reported that there were impacts to QAPI meetings due to unfilled clinical staff positions. On 03/26/2026 at approximately 11:00 AM, this surveyor conducted a record review of the QAPI binder, including QAA committee meeting attendance and signatures. Record review revealed that for the QAPI meeting dated 10/23/2025, there was no documented attendance or signature for the Administrator or Infection Preventionist. For the meeting dated 11/17/2025, there was no documented attendance or signature for the Infection Preventionist. For the meeting dated 12/19/2025, there was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #2 & #130) out of 20 Residents observed for Infection Control during the recertification and complaint survey. The findings include: 1) A Foley catheter bag collects urine from a flexible tube (catheter) inserted into the bladder, typically holding 600–900 mL (leg bags) or up to 2000 mL (bedside bags). Always keep the bag below waist level to use gravity for draining and prevent infection. Empty the bag every 3-4 hours or when it is 1/2 to 2/3 full. During an interview conducted on 03/22/2026 at 8:42 AM, the Surveyor observed Resident #2's bed in the lowest position with the foley catheter bag attached to the right side of the bed and lying on the floor. On 03/22/26 at 9:17 AM the Surveyor reported the observation to the assigned License Practical Nurse (LPN) #3. The Surveyor observed the LPN raise the resident's bed from the lowest position to a position that allowed the foley bag to no longer touch the floor.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an antibiotic stewardship program. This was found to be evident for 5 out of 5 Antibiotic stewardship line listings during the recertification and complaint survey. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents.The findings include:Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) requires a facility to develop and implement policies, procedures and/or protocols to optimize the selection, dosage, route and duration of antibiotic therapy. This is to improve Resident outcomes, reduce the risk of residents having adverse reactions to antibiotics, receiving them unnecessarily and/or developing antibiotic-resistant organisms.An Infection Preventionist (IP) is responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. This position requires specialized training in infection control.Based on a review of a certificate of completion from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on 3/24/2026 at 1:27 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0882 — isolated
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews of the facility records, it was determined that the facility failed to designate an Infection Preventionist at least part time to be responsible for managing its Infection Prevention and Control Program. This was evident during the recertification survey. This deficient practice has the potential to impact all residents in the building. The findings include:An Infection Preventionist (IP) is responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. This position requires specialized training in infection control.Based on a review of a certificate from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on 3/24/2026 at 1:27 PM it reported the Unit Manager for the Western [NAME] Unit had completed the Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course on 3/06/2026.During an interview with the Unit Manager of the Western [NAME] Unit on 3/25/2026 at 12:33 PM she reported she was the full time Unit Manager of the Western [NAME] Unit and was assigned the role of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional and sanitary environment. This was evident in the Laundry Washer Room and the Laundry Folding Room during the recertification survey. This practice has the potential to affect all Residents.The findings include:1. During an observation of the Laundry Washer Room on 3/23/2026 at 1:56 PM a leak was discovered dripping from a pipe in the ceiling and running down the wall in the corner near the dryer room. Additional observation revealed a large area of black staining along the wall and on top of the Ecolab dispensing system box where the water was leaking. Further observation showed a red bucket below the pipe that collected the dripping water.During an interview with Laundry Aide #14 on 3/23/2026 at 1:58 PM she reported the leak from the ceiling had been leaking off and on for a couple of months. She advised maintenance was aware and had worked on the leak.During an interview with the Maintenance Director on 3/23/2026 at 2:09 PM he reported he didn't know the Laundry Washer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-18 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide psychiatric evaluation for a resident (resident #1) who had a history of trauma from physical abuse. This is evident in 1 of 4 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Findings includes: On 3/18/25 at 2:10pm, surveyor review of resident #1's medical records revealed that the resident reported an allegation of abuse from LPN # 4 on 1/17/25 at approximately 8:30am. Resident #1 reported that LPN #4 threw a cup filled with the resident's medication at the resident. Review of the facility investigation on 3/18/25 at 2:20pm revealed that the facility was unable to substantiate the abuse but recommended that the resident receive psychiatric assessment after the alleged abuse incident. Continued review of resident #1's medical record on 3/18/25 at 2:40pm revealed that the resident received a trauma informed care assessment that revealed that the resident had a history of physical abuse and required psychiatric assessment. Further review of resident #1's medical records on 3/18/25 at 2:50pm found no evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of staff to resident abuse and injuries of an unknown origin for four residents (Resident (R) 342, R295, R296 and R13) reviewed for abuse out of 29 sample residents. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility who were at risk of abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse and Neglect-Clinical Protocol revised July 2017 revealed, all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown origin shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies. 1. Review of R295's undated admission Record located in the EMR under the Profile tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including cellulitis, chronic pain, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypertension. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine in the kitchen and on the Southern Shore unit remained clean. This failure has the potential for food-borne illness affecting 97 of 98 residents in the facility. Findings include: During an observation on 01/13/25 at 9:40 AM, the kitchen ice machine, located in the food service area inside the double doors leading to the dining room, clear and brownish colored smears with debris on the top, sides, and front of the ice machine. The interior front portion of the ice machine had an orangish film on the surface. During an observation on 01/13/25 at 10:30 AM, in the Southern Shore unit nourishment room, the ice machine had clear and brownish colored smears with debris. During an interview on 01/14/25 at 8:40 AM, the Assistant Dietary Manager (ADM) verified both ice machines had brown colored smears and debris, and the kitchen ice machine had an orangish film on the surface. During an interview on 01/16/25 at 2:45 PM, the Maintenance Director (MTD) stated the maintenance department cleaned the inside of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to have a functional Antibiotic Stewardship Program that followed the McGeer Criteria for an antibiotic prescribed for one of three residents reviewed for antibiotic usage (Resident (R) 28) out of 29 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to affect residents being prescribed antibiotics that were potentially unnecessary. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship dated 09/25/24 stated, Antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program . The purpose of our antibiotic stewardship program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents . When a nurse calls the physician/prescriber to communicate a suspected infection, he or she will have the following information available: a. Signs and symptoms . Review of R28's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, facility document review, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to provide education for the residents to receive flu and/or pneumococcal vaccines; and failed to obtained a consent/declination for the flu and pneumococcal vaccinations for four of five residents (Resident (R) 11, R13, R66, and R8) out of 29 sample residents. This failure had the potential to put these residents at more risk of developing flu and pneumonia. Findings include: Review of CDC website titled, Pneumococcal Vaccination: Summary of Who and When to Vaccinate, located at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/pneumo/hcp/who-when-to-vaccinate.html, last reviewed 09/12/24, indicated .CDC recommends pneumococcal vaccination for all adults 65 years or older. The tables below provide detailed information . For adults 65 years or older who have not previously received any pneumococcal vaccine, CDC recommends you .Give one dose of PCV20 [pneumococcal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a resident for one of three residents (Resident (R) 58) reviewed for abuse out of 29 sample residents. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility who were at risk of abuse. Findings include: Review of R57's Face Sheet, located in resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, Alzheimer's, major depressive disorder and restlessness and agitation. Review of R57's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/08/24 and located in the resident's EMR under the MDS tab, revealed the facility assessed the resident to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero out of 15, which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of R57's Care Plan, dated 10/31/21 and located in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to investigate an injury of an unknown origin for two residents (Resident (R) 342, and R13) reviewed for abuse out of 29 sample residents. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility who were at risk of abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse and Neglect-Clinical Protocol revised July 2017 revealed, all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown origin shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. 1. Review of R13's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the EMR revealed R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab in the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/13/24 revealed the facility assessed the resident to have a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to update residents (#406 & #407) care plan after a change in condition. This was evident for 2 of 30 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. Findings include: 1. On 1/5/23, the State of Maryland's Office of Health Care Quality received a facility reported incident which reported that Resident #406 alleged that a male staff member touched the resident inappropriately. Review of Resident #406's medical record on 1/16/25 at 11:25 AM revealed a written statement by hospice volunteer #12 which reported that Resident #406 told hospice volunteer #12 that a male GNA touched the resident inappropriately. An additional review of the resident's medical record on 1/16/23 at 11:50 AM revealed no evidence that a change in care plan was made after the resident's allegation. On 1/16/25 at 1:30 PM, the survey team reviewed interviews with the Social Work Director and nursing staff regarding the facility's policies on making appropriate changes to a resident's care plan after a change in condition. The review determined that a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) On 1/5/23, the State of Maryland's Office of Health Care Quality received a facility reported incident which reported that Resident #406 alleged that a male staff member touched the resident inappropriately. Review of Resident #406's medical record on 1/16/25 at 11:25 AM revealed a written statement by hospice volunteer #12 which reported that Resident #406 told hospice volunteer #12 that a male GNA touched the resident inappropriately. An additional review of the resident's medical record on 1/16/23 at 11:50 AM revealed no evidence that a trauma informed assessment was performed to ensure the resident's care was appropriate. On 1/16/25 at 1:30 PM, the survey team reviewed interviews with the Social Work Director and nursing staff regarding the facility's policies on trauma informed care. The review determined that trauma informed care assessments are completed when a resident is admitted and at a change of condition to ensure that the resident is receiving appropriate care. On 1/17/25 at 10:00 AM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' medications were on hand at the facility to be administered per the physician's order for one of 29 sampled residents (Resident (R) 245). This failure placed the resident at risk of not receiving therapeutic pharmacological interventions for ordered medication's indication of use. Findings include: Review of R245's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R245 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of complete intestinal obstruction, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, and hypertension. Review of R245's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab in the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/04/24 revealed the facility that the resident assessed to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of R245's Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to monitor targeted behaviors for an anxiety medication and antidepressant for two of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident (R) 34 and R8) out of 29 sampled residents. This failure had the potential for residents to receive unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring dated December 2016 revealed .When medications are prescribed for behavioral symptoms, documentation will include: .Specific target behaviors . Review of R34's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of anxiety disorder. Review of R34's Physician Orders located under the Orders tab in the EMR revealed an order dated 12/20/24 for Buspar (an antianxiety medication) 10 mg (milligrams); give one tablet by mouth three times a day for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure that one of seven medication carts were kept locked, and medications were kept secured during medication pass. Specifically, medication was left on top of the medication cart, and the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended while the nurse went into the resident's bathroom out of site of the medication cart. This has the potential for other residents or visitors to have access to the medications in the cart. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Security of Medication Cart revised 04/07, revealed The nurse must secure the medication cart during the medication pass to prevent unauthorized entry .Medication carts must be securely locked at all times when out of the nurse's view. Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications revised 04/07 revealed The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. During an observation on 01/16/25 at 11:03 AM, Registered Nurse (RN)4 went into Resident (R)38's room to conduct his blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure that resident information was protected specifically related to electronic medical records. This failure had the potential to cause residents' information to not be safeguarded. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Electronic Medical Records dated 03/14, revealed The facility will make reasonable efforts to limit the use or disclosure of protected health information to only the minimum necessary to accomplish the intended purpose of use or disclosure. During an observation of Registered Nurse (RN)4, on 01/16/25 at 11:03 AM, during a blood sugar check, RN4 left the computer unlocked, and unattended on top of the medication cart, exposing the resident's information, while she was washing her hands in the resident's bathroom. RN4 confirmed she had left the computer open, and stated she should not have left the computer unlocked. During observation conducted during the medication pass task on 01/17/25 at 8:17 AM, with Unit Manager (UM)2, UM2 left the computer on top of the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure that staff donned appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for one Resident(R)293) of one resident that was on contact precautions. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff protected medications from becoming contaminated. These failed practices could result in increased spread of infections among residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Isolation-Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions revealed Transmission-based precautions are initiated when a resident develops signs and symptoms of a transmissible infection; arrives for admission with symptoms of an infection; or has a laboratory confirmed infection; and is at risk of transmitting the infection to other residents .Contact Precautions-1. Contact precautions are implemented for residents known or suspected to be infected with microorganisms that can be transmitted by direct contact with the resident or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-27 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on complaints, reviews of facility administrative records, and an staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to revise and document an accurate up-to-date facility-wide assessment. This was identified during the review of the facility emergency preparedness plan during a complaint survey. This has the potential to affect all residents within the facility. The findings include: A facility-wide assessment is conducted to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The assessment is to include the care required by the resident population considering the types of diseases, conditions, physical and cognitive disabilities, overall acuity, and other pertinent facts that are present within that population. Review of complaints MD00206987 and MD00206855 on 06/26/24 revealed allegations that the facility has not had any ice cubes available for beverages and that there may be a water borne illness in the facility. A review of the Facility Assessment occurred on 06/26/24. The review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaints, reviews of facility administrative records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program by failure by 1) not informing the residents, their representatives, and families of those residing in facilities by 5 p.m. the next calendar day following the occurrence of three or more residents or staff with new onset of respiratory symptoms occurring within 72 hours of each other. (This was evident for 3 different days in June 2024) and 2) ensure consistent infection prevention monitoring for waterborne infections, which was evident by not taking steps to address low resident hand sink water temperatures. This has the potential to affect all residents within the facility. The findings include: 1) Review of complaints MD00206987 and MD00206855 on 06/26/24 revealed allegations that the facility has not had any ice cubes available for beverages and that there may be a water borne illness in the facility. Review of the facility June…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-07-26 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of Resident Council minutes and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide residents' with a written response and rationale to the Resident Council to grievances. This practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 7/25/19 at 10:26 AM the Resident Council President was interviewed. He/she stated the Resident Council meets once a month and the Recreation Director (RD) helps make the meeting arrangements and records the minutes. When asked, the President stated the RD keeps track of grievances brought up during the meeting and gets back with the council members. On 7/25/19 the review of Resident Council minutes for April, May, and June 2019 were requested the following: On 4/23/19 the Resident Council documented a minimum of 10 grievances. On 5/31/19 the Resident Council documented seven (7) written grievances. On 6/24/19 the Resident Council Documented three (3) grievances. There was no documentation to indicate that the appropriate staff members from each department ( such as nursing or dietary) investigated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure physicians completed the Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form with clear non-conflicting orders. This was evident for 1 of 76 residents reviewed for MOLST forms during the survey (Resident #16). According to Maryland's MOLST website (https://marylandmolst.org/), the Maryland MOLST is a portable and enduring form that provides healthcare providers with orders about cardiopulmonary resuscitation and other life-sustaining treatments. The Maryland MOLST form makes your treatment wishes known to health care professionals. The findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 11:03 AM the review of Resident #16's medical record revealed a MOLST, signed and dated on [DATE], by Physician #10. Two options, Attempt CPR and No CPR, were indicated for Resident #16 wishes for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). On [DATE] at 9:03 AM Physician #10 was interviewed by phone. Physician #10 stated that she had intended to mark…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-07-26 · tag F0840 — pattern
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to follow-up on a physician's order to obtain a behavioral service for 1 of 47 residents (Resident #95). The findings include: On 7/25/19 at 2:30 PM the review of Resident #95's medical record revealed a physician's order, dated 5/23/19, for a behavioral health consultation for an anxiety disorder. Further review of the medical record revealed no notes or documentation to show that Resident #95 received the behavioral health consultation as ordered. On 7/27/19 at about 1:30 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) was informed of the physicians order for Resident #95 to have a behavioral health consultation. At 2:30 PM the DON confirmed the behavioral health consultation had not been obtained for Resident #95.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview with residents and staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff treated 1 of 46 sampled residents with dignity and respect (Resident #11). The findings include: On 7/22/19 at 3:24 PM Resident #11 was interviewed. Resident #11 described an incident that occurred between him/her and Nurse #9 in June 2019. The resident stated Nurse #9 came into the television (TV) room where he/she was watching a program and changed the channel before providing Resident #11 an explanation as to why the channel was changed. The resident stated when he/she told the Nurse #9 to turn the TV back to the program he/she was watching, Nurse #9 said that he was checking a program for another resident. Resident #11 stated he/she was angry because Nurse #9 did not provide an explanation prior to turning the channel and changed it with no regard for the fact that he/she was watching it. On 07/25/2019 a review of the facility's documents about the incident between Nurse #9 and Resident #11 revealed a written statement by Unit Manager #12 (UM #12), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure 1 of 46 residents observed for personal hygiene received the appropriate amount of assistance with activities of daily to accommodate the resident's needs and preferences (Resident #49). Activities of Daily Living (ADL) is a term used to describe a people's ability to complete daily self-care task or the level of assistance required to complete daily self-care task. ADLs self- care task include, but is not limited to: bathing, grooming, dressing, eating, and toileting). The findings include: On 7/24/19 at approximately 11:00 AM Resident #49 was observed dressed in his/her pajamas and sitting in a wheelchair. During an interview with Resident #49 he/she expressed a concern that he/she was still in night clothes and therefore unable to participate in a planned activity. The resident went on to say that the facility's staff knows he/she likes to attend activities, and will not go to activities until he/she is dressed. On 7/26/19 at approximately 11:07 AM Unit Manager (UM) #12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the review of facility incident reports, resident medical records, and interviews with residents and the facility's staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff reported allegations of sexual abuse between residents to facility administration immediately upon learning of the abuse. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse (Resident #26). The findings include: A review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) MD00143009 was performed on 7/25/19 at 9:05 AM. During the review, it was found that Resident #109 had reported a concern of possibly unwanted sexual contact between Resident #26 and Resident #37 on 7/12/2019 to recreational staff. However, the report indicates that the Director of Therapeutic Recreation did not make the Administrator aware of the allegation until 7/17/19. The allegation was that Resident #37 put his/her hand under the shirt of Resident #26 and on Resident #26's thigh. Resident #37 was reported to have diagnoses of traumatic brain injury, schizoaffective disorder, and anxiety disorder. Resident #26 was reported to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the medical record reviews and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to send a copy of residents' comprehensive care plan to the receiving health care provider for 2 out of 2 residents investigated for hospitalization (Residents #25 and #216's). The findings include: a). On 7/26/19 at approximately 9:30 am, the review of Resident #25's medical record revealed that on 4/4/19 the resident was assessed by nursing to have acute altered mental status. Resident #25 was sent out to the hospital. The resident was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of Hypokalemia and Encephalopathy. Further review of the medical records, revealed there was no documentation that showed the information that the facility provided to the receiving medical provider regarding Resident #25's on going care. b). On 07/26/19 the review of Resident #216's medical record revealed that on 7/10/19 the resident was noted to to be lethargic and was difficult to arouse. A physician ordered the resident to be sent to the emergency room via 911 for an evaluation for change in his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility's staff failed to provide residents or their responsible party (RP) with a bed hold policy prior to the residents' transfer to a hospital. This was evident for 3 out of 3 residents investigated for hospitalization during the survey process (Residents #25, #116, and #216) . The findings include: 1 a). On 7/26/19 at approximately 9:30 am, the review of Resident #25's medical record revealed that on 4/4/19 the resident was assessed by nursing to have acute altered mental status. Resident #25 was sent out to the hospital. The resident was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of Hypokalemia and Encephalopathy. Further review of the medical records, revealed there was no documentation that the facility provided Resident #25 or his/her RP with the facility's bed hold police prior to or after the resident's transfer to the hospital. b). On 07/26/19 the review of Resident #216's medical record revealed that on 7/10/19 the resident was noted to to be lethargic and was difficult to arouse. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an environment that remained free of hazards. This was evident for 1 of 34 residents rooms reviewed for the environment during the investigation (Resident #166). It is a minimum standard of nursing practice to not leave medications at bedside without a physician order. This is to prevent residents from erroneously taking the medication at the wrong time or with the wrong dose. This standard also prevents other residents who may be confused from wandering into a room and taking medications not meant for them. The findings include: On 7/23/19 at 9:00 AM during an interview, a visitor of Resident #166 stated he/she had given a nurse pre-filled syringes the previous night for Resident #166, and the syringes were still in the resident's room. The visitor stated the resident has Muscular Sclerosis (MD) and the injections are to treat MS. On 07/23/19 at approximately 9:00 AM observations of Resident #166's room revealed a bag containing a box with six (6) pre-filled syringes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, the review of resident medical records, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was administered as ordered by the resident's physician. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Respiratory Care (Resident #101). The findings include: Resident #101 was observed in his/her room on 7/22/19 at 12:39 PM. During the observation, it was noted that the resident was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at a rate of 3 Liters per minute (L/min). In an interview conducted with Resident #101 on 7/22/19 at 12:39 PM, the resident stated that s/he is accustomed to receiving oxygen therapy at home, and receives it at a rate of 2 L/min. Resident #101's medical record was reviewed on 7/22/19 at 1:00 PM. The review revealed that Resident #101 did not have a current and active order to receive oxygen. During a second observation of Resident #101 on 7/23/19 at 11:30 AM, it was found that the resident was still receiving oxygen at a rate of 3 L/min. This concern was brought to the attention of the Director of Nursing on 7/25/19 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on meal service observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to demonstrate the appropriate hand hygiene to prevent the spread of infection while preparing lunch. This was evident for 3 of 3 staff observed preparing the meal tray-line (Dietary Aides #4, #5, and #6). The findings include: On 7/22/19 at 9:54 AM observations of lunch service, with the Dietary Manager, the surveyor observed Dietary Aides (DA) #4, #5, and #6 touching their clothing with their hands. Further observations revealed that DA #4, #5, and #6 did not wash or sanitize their hands before touching and plating residents' lunch trays. On 7/22/19 at 10:10 AM in an interview, the DM. The DM stated that all staff are aware of infection control hand washing policy and these staff members will be in-service again. The Administrator, Director of Nursing with other leadership members were made aware of finding prior to survey exit.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and interviews with staff and a visitor, it was determined the facility failed to ensure visitor wore the appropriate protective equipment when entering the room of a resident on contact isolation. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for isolation precautions during the survey (Resident #166). According to a C. diff fact sheet published by the CDC (Center for Disease Control, https://www.cdc.gov/cdiff/pdf/Cdiff-Factsheet-508.pdf ) Clostridioides difficile (formerly known as Clostridium difficile ) is a bacterium that causes diarrhea and colitis (an inflammation of the colon). C. diff infections can be deadly The factsheet explains that C. diff spreads, when people touch surfaces that are contaminated with poop from an infected person or when people don't wash their hands with soap and water. The CDC recommends that staff and visitors wear gowns and gloves while in the room of a resident with C. diff to help prevent the spread of infection to themselves and others. The findings include: On 7/22/19 at 3:03 PM Resident #166's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$11,190 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $11,190 — penalty dated 2025-01-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EPHRAM LAHASKY — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BSD 26 HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 10/01/2018
BLACK, ELAINEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2018
DANIELS, ELMYRAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2018
BIDERMAN, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2018
LAHASKY, EPHRAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.2M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 16%Other / private 13%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$379per resident / day
operating cost
$11,512per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$371per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215188. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next