Valley View Manor Hcc
200 East Ninth Avenue, Lamberton, MN 56152 · For profit - Corporation · 50 certified beds · (507) 752-7346 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $131,610 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-20)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.8% | 18.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.0% | 4.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.5% | 1.9% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.8% | 2.6% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.8% | 4.1% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.5% | 4.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.7% | 20.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.7% | 12.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.3% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 5.2% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.9% | 24.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 25.6% | 17.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 27.6 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.96 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions were in place to prevent elopement for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R4, R6) who were identified as an elopement risk. This resulted in immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1 when she was able to leave the facility when it was dark and foggy outside and was able to walk 5-6 blocks away before being found, which put R1 at likelihood for serious harm or death. The IJ began on 4/13/26 when R1 was able to elope from the facility after the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment for individualized interventions and level of supervision after R1 removed, then refused, replacement of Wanderguard (personal alarming safety device) on 3/29/26 and continued to display exit seeking behaviors. Additionally, the facility failed to identify and implement individualized interventions to prevent and/or mitigate risk for elopement for R4 and R6. On 4/16/26 at 5:04 p.m., the administrator, director of nursing, and vice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess falls for root cause, implement appropriate interventions and revise the care plan to prevent and/or reduce the risk for future falls for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R4) reviewed for accidents. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for 2 when he sustained a head laceration following a fall and an IJ for R4 when after repeated falls sustained shoulder dislocation that had not identified since the last imaging that did not show dislocation on 7/30/25. The IJ began on 10/20/25 after R2 had a fall that resulted in head laceration, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive analysis and implement appropriate interventions which resulted in and/or could have mitigated the risk of subsequent falls. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on 11/13/25 at 4:01p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 11/17/25 at 4:45 p.m., but non-compliance remained at the lower scope and severity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-09 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure they had obtained and documented an informed consent, including an explanation of the risks and benefits of using a psychotropic medication or alternative treatment options for 1 of 5 residents (R4) sampled. Findings include: R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, accepted on 7/2/26, identified his cognition was mildly impaired, he was dependent on staff to complete activities of daily living (ADL)'s, and had diagnoses of dementia, traumatic brain injury, anxiety, and depression. R4 reported feeling down, depressed, or hopeless several days during the look-back period. R4's Medication Administration Record identified the facility was administering escitalopram (an antidepressant) 5 milligrams (MG) daily for generalized anxiety starting on 12/30/25 and quetiapine (an antipsychotic) 100 mg at bedtime for unspecified dementia with agitation starting on 12/4/25. Interview and document review on 7/8/26 at 8:55 a.m., with the assistant director of nursing identified she was unable to find documentation in R8's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a gradual dose reduction (GDR) was attempted, or a rationale was provided for 1 of 5 residents (R4) sampled. Findings include: R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accepted on 7/2/26, identified his cognition was mildly impaired, he was dependent on staff to complete activities of daily living (ADL)'s and had diagnosis of dementia, traumatic brain injury, anxiety, and depression. R4 reported feeling down, depressed, or hopeless several days over past 2 weeks. R4 had no behaviors during the assessment period. Antipsychotics were received on a routine basis and a gradual dose reduction was noted to have not been attempted. R4's Medication Administration Record identified the facility was administering escitalopram (an antidepressant) 5 milligrams (MG) daily for generalized anxiety and quetiapine (an antipsychotic) 100mg at bedtime for unspecified dementia with agitation. R4's November 2025, pharmacy (RPh) medication review report identified a recommendation to the physician (MD) by the RPH to assess R4 for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-09 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the county (designated State Mental Health Authority (SMHA)) for 1 of 5 residents (R8) who had new on-set of mental illness. Findings include: R8's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accepted on 4/22/26, identified he had diagnoses of bi-polar disorder, PTSD, and personality disorder. R8's cognition was intact, and he had not displayed any behaviors during the assessment period. R8's Pre admission Screen (PAS) completed on 5/24/24, had a section noting if the person had a current diagnosis of mental illness to which it was documented he had a diagnosis of bi-polar disorder. There was no mention R8 had diagnoses of personality disorder or PTSD at that time. R8's diagnosis list identified he had been diagnosed with a personality disorder on 6/24/25 and PTSD on 5/28/24, both after his admission. Interview on 7/7/26 at 2:30 p.m., with the social service designee (SSD) identified she takes a glance at the PAS when they get a new admission to see if a level II PASARR is required but does not check for new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate antibiotic use for 1 of 3 residents (R16), who were reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. Findings include: R16's 5/11/26, accepted discharge and entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified she had severe cognitive impairment, required limited staff assistance with activities of daily living, (ADLs). She was frequently incontinent of both bowel and bladder and had diagnoses of diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and Alzheimer's disease. R16's 3/12/26 at 9:58 a.m. progress note identified the nurse practitioner (NP) had discussed the use of Macrobid (an antibiotic specifically used to treat acute, uncomplicated bladder infections (cystitis)), with R16's family member on 3/10/26 and would not recommend long-term use related to R16's age and the impact to her kidneys. R16's, 4/21/26 at 10:58 a m. NP note identified she was seen for a routine follow-up visit. The note reported she would not be ordering a chronic antibiotic for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered Elopement care plan that included interventions to mitigate the risk of elopement for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for accidents. Findings include:R1's face sheet dated 4/15/26, identified diagnoses of unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance and depression.R1's Quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had moderate cognitive impairment, had delusions/hallucinations, no other behaviors, no rejection of care, no wandering, did not use a walker or wheelchair, was independent with transfer and ambulation, had two or more falls since admission with no injury, and used a wander/elopement alarm daily. R1's elopement evaluation dated 3/26/26, identified R1 was at risk for elopement due to wandering behaviors that were likely to affect the safety or wellbeing of others. R1 had a personal safety device applied.During an interview on 4/15/26 at 4:25 p.m., director of nursing (DON) stated R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee identified, investigated, analyzed, and responded to increase in resident falls and as needed (PRN) psychotropics being administered as a chemical restraint by developing and implementing action plans for process improvement. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents that resident in the facility. Findings include: SEE F689: Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess falls for root cause, implement appropriate interventions and revise the care plan to prevent and/or reduce the risk for future falls for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R4) reviewed for accidents. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for 2 when he sustained a head laceration following a fall and an IJ for R4 when after repeated falls sustained shoulder dislocation that had not identified since the last imaging that did not show dislocation on 7/30/25.SEE F605: Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed ensure residents were free from chemical restraints by not identifying duplicative antipsychotic therapy without appropriate indications, failed to identify target behaviors, failed to develop individualized non-pharmacological interventions, and failed to attempt and/or offer non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of as needed (PRN) doses of antipsychotic medications for 1 of 1 resident (R2) who had verbal and physical behaviors towards staff reviewed for falls. Findings include: Antipsychotic medications are a class of drugs used to treat psychosis-conditions where a person has difficulty distinguishing reality, often involving delusions, hallucinations, paranoia, or disorganized thinkingAccording to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the package insert for Seroquel (quetiapine) carries boxed warnings for increased mortality in elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis and suicidal thoughts/behaviors in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure that alleged violations involving abuse/neglect were reported to the administrator and to the State Agency (SA) timely, in accordance with established policies for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed for injury of unknown origin.Findings include:R5's face sheet dated 11/19/25, identified diagnoses malignant neoplasm of the of ovary and malignant neoplasm of the thyroid gland (cancer of the thyroid gland), and morbid obesity.R5's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R5 had no skin issues, was frequently incontinent of bowel, and was cognitively intact.R5's skin focus care plan dated 10/31/25, identified R5 was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to morbid obesity and lack of mobility. During an interview on 11/18/25 at 12:24 p.m., hospice registered nurse (H-RN) stated that as a hospice nurse she is a contracted staff that provided extra support to residents in the facility while under hospice care. H-RN performed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered behavior care plan with individualized interventions for behavior management for 1 of 1resident (R2) with Alzheimer's Disease. Findings include:R2's face sheet dated 11/14/25, identified diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease( a progressive neurological disorder and the most common cause of dementia), congestive heart failure (a chronic condition where the heart muscle cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), diabetes mellitus (the body does not produce enough insulin), and chronic obstructive respiratory failure (when the airways that carry air to the lungs become narrow or damaged). R2's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R2 needed supervision/touching assistance for transfers, had severe cognitive impairment, had physical behavior symptoms towards others 1-3 days, verbal behavior symptoms directed towards others 4-6 days, but less than daily, and other behavioral symptoms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to revise the care plan for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R6) who were reviewed for falls and impaired skin integrity. Findings include:R2's face sheet dated 11/14/25, identified diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease( a progressive neurological disorder and the most common cause of dementia), congestive heart failure (a chronic condition where the heart muscle cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), diabetes mellitus (the body does not produce enough insulin), and chronic obstructive respiratory failure (when the airways that carry air to the lungs become narrow or damaged). R2's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R2 used a wheelchair and needed supervision/touching assistance for transfers and ambulation, had one fall with no injury, one fall with minor injury since admission and had severe cognitive impairment. R2's functional performance focus care plan dated 2/3/25, identified R2's care plan goal of to progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure treatments were used per standards of practice and only applied with a corresponding physician order for 2 of 2 residents (R5, R7) reviewed for non-pressure related skin concerns. Findings include:Findings includeR5's face sheet dated 11/19/25, identified diagnoses of neoplasm(cancer) of the ovary and thyroid gland, morbid obesity (excessive body fat), and abdominal hernia (where abdominal organs push through a weak spot in the abdominal wall). R5's impaired skin integrity focus care plan dated 10/31/25, identified R5 was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to morbid obesity and lack of mobility with goal of skin will remain intact. Interventions included as followed: encourage resident to frequently shift weight; encourage use of lifting devices while in bed and evaluate for pitting edema. R5's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R5 was received hospice services, was dependent with bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor an open blister and discoloration of skin on 1 of 1 resident (R5) and in addition failed to comprehensively assess and monitor a laceration for 1 of 1 resident (R7) reviewed for non-pressure skin issues. Findings include: R5's face sheet dated 11/19/25, identified diagnoses of neoplasm(cancer) of the ovary and thyroid gland and morbid obesity (excessive body fat).R5's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R5 dependent with bed mobility and transfers, no pressure, venous or arterial ulcers, received hospice services, and was cognitively intact.R5's clinical admission assessment dated [DATE], identified R5's skin was warm, dry, and intact. R5 had an old intravenous site on her right antecubital space (the bend in arm) and the dorsum (top) of the right hand. No other skin issues noted on the clinical admission assessment. R5's hospice note dated 10/29/25, identified R5 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor a pressure wound, failed to timely notify the physician of new ulcer development, and failed to provide physician ordered treatments for 1 of 1 resident (R6) reviewed for skin integrity.Findings include:R6's face sheet dated 11/19/25, identified diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting left side, diabetes mellitus (body does not make enough insulin), and heart failure (a condition where the heart does not pump enough blood to the body). R6's skin integrity focus care plan last revised on 4/29/25, identified R6 had a potential impairment to skin integrity related to bowel and bladder incontinence and impaired mobility. Goal to maintain or develop clean and intact skin. Interventions were as followed: may apply barrier cream after each incontinent episode; elevate heels off the bed; keep skin clean and dry, use lotion on dry skin, prefers to not be checked every two hours; pressure relieving/reducing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and document review the facility failed to maintain a complete, accurate and readily accessible medical record was maintained for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R4) who were noted to have missing information in their record. Findings include: R1's face sheet dated 11/13/25, identified diagnoses of atherosclerotic heart disease (plaque buildup in the arteries), morbid obesity (excess fat), depression (a mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness), and anxiety (a mental and physical state characterized by feelings of dread or worry).R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], was independent with transfers and was cognitively intact.During an interview on 11/14/25 at 2:04 p.m., health information manager (HIM) stated R1 had been seen for routine nursing home visits on 8/1/25 and 10/7/25, however, R1's physician visit dictated notes had not been placed in R1's electronic health record (EHR), due to the notes being located in the outside medical systems. HIM stated she does not have access to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure there was a communication process between the long-term care (LTC) facility and the hospice provider to ensure the needs of the resident are addressed and met 24 hours per day. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a designated interdisciplinary team member (IDT) was responsible for the coordinating with hospice representative and LTC staff in the hospice care planning process for 2 of 2 residents (R2, R5) reviewed for hospice services.Findings include:Findings include:R2's face sheet dated 11/14/25, identified diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease( a progressive neurological disorder and the most common cause of dementia), congestive heart failure (a chronic condition where the heart muscle cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), diabetes mellitus (the body does not produce enough insulin), and chronic obstructive respiratory failure (when the airways that carry air to the lungs become narrow or damaged). R2's Annual Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-14 · tag F0554 — widespreadAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to determine whether a resident was safe to self-monitor diabetic medication treatment results (blood glucose levels) for 1 of 1 residents (R13) who had a continuous blood glucose monitoring system (FreeStyle 3 Libre). Findings include: Observation and interview on 5/14/25 at 8:15 a.m., with R13 identified she had a sensor on the back of her arm and a hand held meter. She placed the meter near the sensor and it recorded her blood glucose level. She identified the nurse would come in and ask her what her blood sugar is and she would tell them. If my blood sugar is low they give me orange juice or a snack. R13 was not aware of any time that she would need to do a manual blood sugar check and was not familiar with how the alarms worked on the device. Review of R13's Self Administration of Medications assessment did not identify R13 had been given any guidance or assessed to ensure she was knowledgeable on how to use the monitor or when she would need to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff were competent to use a continuous glucose monitoring device (FreeStyle Libre 3) for 1 of 1 resident (R)13 who had a diagnosis of diabetes. Findings include: R13's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified her cognition was intact, she required assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living (ADL)'s, and had diagnosis of diabetes, heart failure, respiratory failure, bi-polar disorder, borderline personality disorder, and depression. R13's May 2025, administration record identified she was to have her blood glucose level monitored and recorded three times a day before meals. R13 was to be administered 40 units of insulin aspart protamine and insulin aspart (a combination of fast acting and intermediate acting insulin to keep blood sugar levels under control) subcutaneous two times a day at 8:00 a.m., and 4:00 p.m. In addition, R13 was to be administered a correction dose based on her blood sugar levels at the time of administration. R13's 4/30/25 through 5/13/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-14 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure dietary staff had appropriate training with competencies to carry out the function of monitoring the dish machine temperatures to ensure appropriate sanitation occurred. Findings include: Observation and interview on 5/13/25 at 9:30 a.m., with dietary aide (DA)-A who ran a load of dishes through the dish machine. The gauge located on the right side was at 170 degrees and did not move. The gauge, located on the left side moved during the wash and rinse cycle showing the wash cycle was to be 160 degrees and the rinse cycle was 180 degrees. DA-A reported she observed and documented temperatures once a shift. She reported the left gauge was the wash cycle, and the right gauge was the rinse cycle. When DA-A was asked if the temperature needed to reach a certain temperature, she replied there was no special temperature it had to be. Interview and observation on 5/13/25 at 10:11 a.m., with maintenance director identified one gauge read both the wash and rinse temperature. The maintenance director accompanied…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-14 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to develop and implement 1 of 1 facility assessment to ensure staff were trained and deemed competent for blood glucose monitoring and device usage. In addition, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 dietary aides (DA-A) was trained to ensure appropriate sanitation occurred in the dishwashing machine. Findings include: BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING Observation and interview on 5/14/25 at 8:15 a.m., with R13 identified she had a sensor on the back of her arm and a hand held meter. She placed the meter near the sensor and it recorded her blood glucose level. She identified the nurse would come in and ask her what her blood sugar is and she would tell them. If my blood sugar is low they give me orange juice or a snack. R13 was not aware of any time that she would need to do a manual blood sugar check and was not familiar with how the alarms worked on the device. Review of R13's Self Administration of Medications assessment did not identify R13 had been given any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications had identified target behaviors or symptoms, failed to monitor the target behaviors or symptom, and failed to monitor for adverse effects of the medication for 1 of 4 residents (R4) reviewed for psychotropic medication use. Additionally, the facility failed to have non-pharmacological meaningful interventions that were personalized for target behaviors or symptoms. Findings include: R4's 4/24/25, quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) identified R4's cognition was moderately impaired. She had functional limitations of both upper and lower extremities and required extensive to total assistance with cares. R4 took an antipsychotic and antidepressant medication. The MDS identified diagnoses of neurological condition, left side weakness, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and seizure disorder. R4's 5/13/25, Order Summary Report identified bupropion HCI ER (Wellbutrin XL) 300 milligrams (mg) every day (QD) an antidepressant medication for mood disorder due to known physiological condition. Quetiapine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident status was accurately identified in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 12 sampled residents (R24). Findings include: R24's 5/17/24, Preadmission Screening Results (PAS) identified no level II assessment was needed. The PAS identified that R24 had post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression. R24's 5/27/24, admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment lacked identification of PTSD. R24's 8/27/24, quarterly and the 10/21/24, significant change MDS identified PTSD diagnosis. R24's 5/14/25, medical diagnosis list identified PTSD, depression, and anxiety. Interview on 5/14/25 at 3:52 p.m., with assistant director of nursing (ADON) identified she would expect the MDS would be coded correctly to reflect the resident's actual condition. She reported R24's admission MDS had been completed by a contracted staff and she now had taken over completing the MDS's at the facility. She confirmed that R24's admission MDS had lacked identification of the PTSD diagnosis. Which would trigger care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that addressed anticoagulant (prevents and breaks down blood clots) therapy with safety precautions for 1 of 1 (R25) resident reviewed for care plan. Findings include: R25's 3/06/25, Significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) identified R25 was admitted [DATE]. R25 had a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm) and hip fracture. R25 was moderately cognitively impaired and had taken anticoagulants on a routine basis. R25's current, undated Order Summary Report identified R25 was to receive Eliquis (anticoagulant used to prevent blood clots) 2.5 milligrams (mg) twice a day for atrial fibrillation. The order identified the medication was to start on 8/19/24. R25's current, undated care plan lacked individualized documentation of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for R25, as well as, side effects and/or adverse effects of the medication use. Interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to revise 1 of 1 resident (R8) care plan following a change of condition. Findings include: R8's 4/23/25, quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified R8's cognition was intact. R8 required extensive assistance by one staff for transfers, toileting, and bed mobility. R8 took insulin daily and a diuretic (medication to remove fluid excess from the body). R8's 5/14/25, diagnosis list identified Alzheimer's disease, congestive heart failure, pain in right toes, pain in left ankle and foot, osteoarthritis, and diabetes mellitus. R8's 4/30/25, emergency department (ED) provider note identified R8 had presented to the ED for evaluation of increased weakness and falls. Assessment noted bruising with some swelling and tenderness of the left lower leg and ankle area. Some bruising was noted as being present on the right lower leg but without any tenderness. X-ray of left ankle revealed a fractured ankle and the ankle was splinted. The note indicated R8 would benefit from orthopedic follow-up to discuss whether…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to have an integrated care plan to coordinate and delineate what services hospice was to provide and what services the facility was to provide, to ensure oversight and services would be provided for 1 of 1 resident (R11) reviewed for hospice care. Findings include: R11's 3/9/25, annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified R11 was dependent on staff for all cares, he received hospice services. R11's undated facility care plan identified activities of daily living (ADL) deficit related to dementia and muscle/skeletal impairment. R11 was dependent on staff for care needs. The nutrition focus area identified R11 had nutritional problem related to diagnosis of alcohol dependency, anxiety, hepatitis C, dementia, epilepsy, hypertension, insomnia, depression, seizures, psychosis, and hospice status. There was no other mention of hospice as a whole, nor was there mention of what services the facility was to provide, or what services hospice was to provide mentioned on R11's care plan. R11's direct care staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 staff (housekeeping aide (HK)-A) was appropriately given a second tuberculosis test within 1-2 weeks after the first step was completed upon hire. Review of the current, undated Regulations for Tuberculosis Control in Minnesota Health Care Settings, located at https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/tb/rules/tbregsmanual.pdf for Tuberculosis Control in Minnesota Health Care Settings, identified baseline TB screening is required for all healthcare workers (HCW). Baseline TB screening consists of three components: 1. Assessing for current symptoms of active TB disease, 2. Assessing TB history, and 3. Testing for the presence of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis by administering either a two-step TST or single IGRA.before hire. The second TST may be performed after the health care worker (HCW) starts working with patients. An employee may begin working with patients after a negative TB symptom screen (i.e., no symptoms of active TB disease) and a negative IGRA or TST (i.e., first step) dated within 90…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to complete a review of antibiotic therapy between 48-72 hours to ensure appropriateness of the continued use of an antibiotic for 1 of 3 (R21) sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the current, undated, Centers for Disease Control (CDC): The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes, Appendix A: Policy and Practice Actions to Improve Antibiotic Use, located at https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/core-elements/pdfs/core-elements-antibiotic-stewardship-appendix-a-508.pdf, identified facilities should evaluate the clinical signs and symptoms when a resident is first suspected of having an infection. Once the resident is placed on an antibiotic, they should be comprehensively reviewed within 48-72 hours after starting the medication to ensure they have been prescribed an effective medication. This is accomplished by reviewing the resident current symptoms and any laboratory results to identify medication effectiveness. The CDC identifies this process as an antibiotic time-out. Review of the infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 (R28) were offered and/or provided updated vaccinations for pneumococcal disease, in accordance with Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Findings include: R28's 2/09/25, admission Minimum Data Set identified R28 was [AGE] years old and had a diagnoses of dementia, anxiety and diabetes. R28 was offered but decline the pneumococcal vaccine (PCV). R28's current, undated immunization report indicated R28 had received PCV-7 on 2/16/11, PPV23 on 6/14/13, followed by PCV-13 on 7/12/19. Review of the current, 10/26/24, Centers for Disease Control (CDC): Pneumocococcal Vaccine Recommendations, located at https://www.cdc.gov/pneumococcal/hcp/vaccine-recommendations/index.html, identified based on shared clinical decision-making, adults 65 years or older have the option to get PCV20 or PCV21, or to not get additional pneumococcal vaccines. They can get PCV20 or PCV21 if they have received both the PCV13 (but not PCV15, PCV20, or PCV21) at any age…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and provide an adequate plan for supervision and appropriate interventions to protect, respect and promote rights of the resident to meet individual needs, for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for elopement. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 (R1) resident care plans were revised and staff were aware of interventions to maintain resident safety. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], identified intact cognition with no behaviors. R1 was independent with toileting and oral hygiene, eating, transfers, and ambulation. R1 required supervision with shower/bath, upper and lower dressing, and personal hygiene. R1 was continent of bowel and bladder. R1's diagnoses included: coronary artery disease (CAD), atrial fibrillation (AFIB), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (enlarged prostate causes obstructive urinary flow), and obstructive uropathy. R1 required no wander guard or alarms. R1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse to the administrator and State Agency (SA) for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for allegations of abuse. Findings include: A Nursing Home Incident Report submitted to the State Agency on 6/18/24 at 6:12 p.m., indicated R1 reported an allegation of abuse to licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A on 6/17/24 at 2130 (9:30 p.m.). R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had intact cognition and no noted behaviors. R1 required staff supervision with transferring, dressing, and walking, but was independent with bed mobility. R1's Progress Note subtitled Behavior Charting dated 6/17/24 at 20:38 (10:38 p.m.), indicated R1 reported that the night prior (6/16/24), a large lady turned mean and grabbed her neck and pulled her very hard which caused her neck to hurt. R1 indicated she was afraid the woman would come back to hurt her again. R1 gave a description of the woman to the LPN-A. The progress note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was used according to EBP indications for high-contact resident care activities for 2 of 2 residents (R5 and R18) with a wound and indwelling catheter. Additionally, the facility failed to monitor, track and trend for signs and symptoms of infections in the facility. Findings include: EBP R5's 4/19/24, significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified R5's cognition was intact, R5 required assistance of one staff for cares and transfers. R5 had an indwelling catheter and was continent of bowel. R5 had pain and took a scheduled pain medication, she was short of breath when lying flat, and had a stage 4 pressure ulcer with full thickness tissue loss that was present upon admission. R5 received pressure ulcer cares and had pressure relieving devices on her bed and in her wheelchair. R5 received daily diabetic injection, took an antidepressant, diuretic, antiplatelet, and antibiotic during the assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the acting infection preventionist (IP) (who is the facility's director of nursing (DON)) had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. This had the potential to affect all 21 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Interview on 6/04/24 at 02:16 p.m., with director of nursing (DON) stated, she had not completed her IP training and certification and planned to complete it when time allotted her to do so. She stated no other staff in the facility had IP training and she was assigned as the IP designee when the assistant director of nursing ADON resigned from his position abruptly. Interview on 6/04/24 at 02:27 p.m., with administrator stated the facility does not have a certified IP at the facility due to the ADON leaving their position at the facility and could not provide records for 2 of the residents to confirm COVID vaccines were offered. Review of 7/20/23 Facility Assessment identified the facility had a certified IP in the facility and would have monthly infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure privacy of resident's medical information for 1 of 1 facility medication cart which involved 10 of 21 residents (R1, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R10, R11, R18, and R175). This had the potential to be viewed by any resident and visitor passing by common room across from the nursing station. Findings include: R1's, 4/13/24 quarterly, Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) identified R1 was admitted on [DATE]. R1 had a diagnosis of medically complex conditions, such as diabetes, depression, and schizophrenia. R4's, 4/03/24, Significant Change MDS identified R4 was admitted in March 2023. R4 had a diagnosis of other neurological conditions, high blood pressure, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (decreased blood-flow to extremities). R5's, 4/19/24, Significant Change MDS identified R5 was admitted in March 2024. R5 had a diagnoses of diabetes, depression, and respiratory failure. R6's, 5/08/24 quarterly, MDS identified R6 was admitted in June 2020. R6 had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 5 sampled residents (R172, R173, R174 and R175) were appropriately vaccinated against pneumonia upon admission. Findings include: Review of the current CDC pneumococcal vaccine guidelines located at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/pneumo/hcp/pneumo-vaccine-timing.html, identified for: 1) Adults [AGE] years of age or older, staff were to offer and/or provide based off previous vaccination status as shown below: a) If NO history of vaccination, offer and/or provide: aa) the PCV-20 OR bb) PCV-15 followed by PPSV-23 at least 1 year later. b) For PPSV-23 vaccine ONLY (at any age): aa) PCV-20 at least 1 year after prior PPSV-23 OR bb) PCV-15 at least 1 year after prior PPSV-23 c) For PCV-13 vaccine ONLY (at any age): aa) PCV-20 at least 1 year after prior PCV13 OR bb) PPSV-23 at least 1 year after prior PCV13 d) For PCV-13 vaccine (at any age) AND PPSV-23 BEFORE 65 years: aa) PCV-20 at least 5 years after last pneumococcal vaccine dose OR bb)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to offer the Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine to 2 of 5 residents (R172 and R173) reviewed for COVID immunizations upon admission. Findings include: R172's, 5/28/24 admission minimum data assessment (MDS) identified R172 was cognitively intact and had a diagnosis of anemia. R172's current, undated vaccine history log identified she had no record of being offered or declination of the COVID-19 vaccine. R173's, 5/29/24 admission minimum data assessment (MDS) identified R173 was cognitively intact and had a diagnosis of heart disease and high blood pressure. R173's current, undated vaccine history log identified he had no record of being offered or declination of the COVID-19 vaccine. Interview on 6/04/24 at 1:57 p.m., with director of nursing (DON) stated she was unsure if the facility had administered COVID vaccines to residents. She thought perhaps R172 and R173 were not interested in receiving the COVID vaccine but could not provide a declination form for either resident to show they had been instructed on risks to benefits…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control technique during 1 of 1 meal service. This had the potential to affect all 23 residents in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 3/29/24 beginning at 11:50 a.m. and extending through the noon meal service identified multiple incidents of potential cross contamination and issues with hand hygiene. Cook-A applied gloves and arranged serving utensils on top of the covered steam table pans. He then picked up tray cards from a table behind the steam table, found the card he was looking for, placed it onto a tray, picked up a plate and using a spatula in his right hand and his left gloved hand, picked up a piece of fish from the steam tray, placed it onto the plate, folded back the foil over the scalloped potatoes, placed a scoop of potatoes onto the plate, used his right gloved hand to push some potatoes back onto the plate from the edge, retrieved a slice of bread from the open bag on the side of the steam table and placed it on top of the plate of food, picked up a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices in accordance with Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations to prevent and/or mitigate the risk of the spread of communicable disease Influenza such as utilization of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), appropriate hand hygiene, preventing ill staff from working, implement active symptom screening for residents and staff, and providing staff ongoing education during outbreak. The facility's failures resulted in an Influenza A outbreak that effected 9 out out of 23 residents and had the potential to effect the remaining residents, visitors, and staff. Findings include: During entrance conference on 3/27/24, State Agency was made aware of an Influenza A outbreak in the facility. The outbreak started that began on 3/16/24, effected 9 out of 23 residents. Five residents were on isolation precautions at the start of the survey. and is continuing and affecting nine out of 23 residents. Five residents (R7, R11, R13, R14 and R15). Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the facility determined the required time needed for the infection preventionist based on the facility assessment, resident census and characteristics, and during communicable disease outbreaks. Further failed to ensure the IP was afforded adequate time and resources to effectively execute infection control program activities to prevent and/or mitigate the risk of infectious spread. Findings include: SEE F812: Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control technique during 1 of 1 meal service. This had the potential to affect all 23 residents in the facility. SEE F880: Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices in accordance with Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations to prevent and/or mitigate the risk of the spread of communicable disease Influenza such as utilization of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), appropriate hand hygiene, preventing ill staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure all staff working in the dietary department had training on use of equipment, safe temperatures to ensure food safety and sanitation processes. This had the potential to affect all 23 residents in the facility. Findings include: Entrance conference on 3/27/24 at 9:15 a.m. with the director of nursing (DON) and administrator identified the facility was having issues with staffing in the dietary department and multiple staff were assisting with meal preparation and clean up. Both the DON and administrator reported they had assisted in the dietary department. The administrator reported she had worked as a dietary aide and assisted with cleanup. The DON reported she had done dishes and assisted with the dining room. Review of the dietary schedule for March 2024 identified 1 trained medication aide (TMA)-A scheduled as PM (evening meal) cook. Review of the January, February and March 2024 dietary schedules identified TMA-A worked 3 shifts in January 2024, 8 shifts in February 2024, and 9 shifts in March 2024 as the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to their personal funds upon request for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed. This had the potential to effect 14 residents who utilized a personal funds account. Findings include: During an interview on 3/28/2 at 10:19 a.m., R5 stated she was able to access her money only when administration or the business office was open. She could not access her personal funds on weekends or holidays. During an interview on 3/28/24 at 2:00p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A indicated if a resident wants funds they have to go to the administrator or the business office manager during business hours. During an interview and observation on 3/28/24 at 2:26 p.m., the administrator indicated residents do have access to their money after hours and thought there was $30.00 in the medication room in a cash box if a resident requested money. Further indicated all staff should know how to access it. The administrator requested the assistance of LPN-A to gain access to the medication room holding the cash box but had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to provide required timely notifications for 1 of 2 residents ( R4) who experienced falls. Findings include: R4's 3/17/24 Significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified she was on hospice services (3/7/24), her cognition was intact, and she required supervision and assistance with her Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). R4 had diagnoses of dementia, malnutrition, history of falls and urinary incontinence. R4 experienced 3 documented falls in the month March and family members expressed their concern regarding supervision and factors contributing to her falls. 1.) 3/11/24 at 1:45 p.m. R4 was found lying on the floor in her room with her walker next to her. Blood was noted on the floor and she had a large lump and a laceration on the back of her head. Additional minor injuries included skin tears on her left hand, right forearm, and ankle. R4's record indicated the family was notified. 2.) 3/20/24 at 5:00 p.m. R4 was walking in the hall with her walker and had a gait belt around her waist. An unidentified staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to provide adequate and specialized rehabilitative services of occupational therapy (OT) and physical therapy (PT) therapy according to residents individualized needs based on a comprehensive assessment for 2 of 2 residents (R2 and R10) who had orders for physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT). Findings include: R2's diagnoses included bilateral osteoarthritis, sepsis, pressure wound on buttocks and weakness. R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], did not have cognitive impairment, did have impairment to range of motions (ROM) to one upper extremity and both lower extremities, used a walker and wheelchair. R2 was dependent with lower body dressing and putting on/off footwear, personal hygiene and sit to lying position. R2 required maximal assist with toilet hygiene, shower/bathing, rolling side to side in bed, sit to stand position, and transfers. Partial assist with upper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to complete comprehensively assess and provide adequate of level of supervision to prevent elopement for 1 of 1 residents (R1) who had a history of elopements and fall with fracture. Findings include: A Vulnerable Adult Maltreatment Report submitted to the State Agency (SA) on 11/7/23 at 12:36 p.m., indicated R1 eloped from the facility on 11/5/23 and continues to leave facility unsupervised and without staff knowledge. Indicated R1 is at a high risk for falls and further injury due to a recent fall on 10/30/23, which resulted in R1 obtaining a fracture of the right lower leg, The report further indicated R1 was not to bear weight on the right leg and always wear a knee immobilizer but R1 refused to follow the orders. R1's face sheet indicated R1 had a guardian. R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R7 had intact cognition and was independent with transferring and ambulating. R1 used a walker. R1 did not exhibit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act when they were notified of suspected criminal activity by a resident (R2) occurring in the facility. Findings include: An anonymous report submitted to the State Agency on 10/10/23 at 9:30 a.m., alleged a suspicion of a crime occurring at the facility when it was reported to facility staff that R2's personal computer contained adolescent pornography. The report also indicated the facility had a history of residents sharing pornographic material on their personal computers. Further indicated the administrator and director of nursing (DON) were aware of the suspected criminal activity but had not reported to the State Agency (SA) and law enforcement. R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 had moderate cognitive impairment. Due to the fear of retaliation from facility administration, staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to perform a comprehensive investigation for 1 of 1 resident R182 with allegation of potential misappropriation of property (missing money) by interviewing other residents, staff, and persons of interest in connection with the incident. This had the potential to affect any resident with monies kept on their person and not locked away. Findings include: Review of the 5/10/23 report to the State Agency (SA) identified R182 reported to the assistant director of nursing (ADON) some money was missing. R182 stated in April 2023, she had a friend/landlord bring her some money. R182 reported a specific amount of $3,780.00 was in the envelope. R182 denied counting it upon receipt but thought she must have. She last checked the envelope approximately 1 week prior and reported it had not felt as thick as it once was. She then counted it and discovered the envelope contained $1600.00. When staff inquired if she had any ideas who ma have taken the money, she stated there was 1 shady looking person but refused to give a name. Local law…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse immediately or no later than two (2) hours to the State Agency for 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R2). In addition, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident-to-resident sexual abuse to the State Agency (SA) for 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R3) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R1 and R2 A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) submitted to the State Agency on 8/11/23, at 1:55 a.m., alleged R1 punched R2 in the face. The resident-to-resident altercation occurred on 8/10/23, at 9:35 p.m. During an interview on 8/17/23 at 11:35 a.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated certified nursing assistant (CNA)-A notified her of the altercation between R1 and R2 on 8/11/23, at 12:30 a.m. The DON indicated the on-duty charge nurse at the time of the altercation did not notify her of the incident which caused the vulnerable adult (VA) report to be submitted late. R1 and R3 During an interview on 8/17/23 at 12:25 p.m., registered nurse (RN-A) stated R1 was aggressive and impulsive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation of an allegation of potential sexual abuse was completed for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. In addition, the facility failed to protect residents after an allegation of abuse occurred for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R1 R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had severe cognitive impairment. R1 was exhibiting signs of impulsiveness, lack of safety awareness, and socially inappropriate statements. R1's diagnoses included dementia with agitation. R1's care plan initiated 6/29/23, indicated R1 was at risk for elopement related to disorientation and impaired safety awareness. Care plan was updated on 8/11/23, to reflect R1 had the potential to be physically aggressive related to history of harm to others, poor impulse control, and lack of safety awareness. R1 could become physically aggressive when interacting with others. The care plan lacked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$131,610 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $50,164 — penalty dated 2026-04-20
- $81,446 — penalty dated 2025-11-19
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-04 for 33 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EPHRAM LAHASKY — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.1 | +1.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AREM, JEFFREY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 13% | since 07/14/2015 |
| KATZ, ABE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 21% | since 04/01/2016 |
| DORR-JONES, SHAWNA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 09/01/2015 |
| GOERITZ, THOMAS | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 03/15/2016 |
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $484K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245378. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.