No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Gardens Of Euclid Beach

16101 Euclid Beach Blvd, Cleveland, OH 44110 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (216) 486-2300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Oct 2019Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$200,605 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $200,605 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-23)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
25200 Chagrin Blvd Ste 300 · (216) 383-2834 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
16100 Lake Shore Blvd · (216) 383-3803 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
C-Town0.9 mi
18120 Lanken Ave · (216) 481-1616 · Call to confirm hours
Park
16975 Willow Wood Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.1%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.3%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms14.8%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.5%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.3%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.9%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.5%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%3.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.4%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table0.8%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.0%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine10.2%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.72
RN hours/ resident / day
0.88
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.82
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.50
RN hoursweekends
71.4%
Total nursing turnover
100.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 60.9 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

21
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-23)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-23 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, review of emergency medical services (EMS) run report, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation or timely call EMS for Resident #13, a resident with advance directives for a Full Code status (indication for healthcare providers to perform all possible lift-saving measures in the event of a cardiac or respiratory arrest). This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm/Subsequent Death on [DATE] at 5:40 P.M. when Resident #13 was found unresponsive and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #521 failed to initiate CPR. EMS was not called until [DATE] at 6:23 P.M. and arrived at the facility at 6:32 P.M. Upon arrival, EMS determined Resident #13 was deceased , CPR was not in progress by facility staff and EMS were informed Resident #13 had been pronounced deceased in the facility at 5:40 P.M. This affected one resident (#13) of ten residents reviewed for death. The facility census was 53. On [DATE] at 1:27 P.M., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, closed record review, review of emergency medical services (EMS) run reports, review of the facility assessment and floor plan, review of facility staffing, policy review and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess and provide timely and necessary medical intervention for residents identified to have an acute change in condition. In addition, the facility failed to provide basic life support (BLS) and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) in accordance with BLS/CPR standards of practice, failed to maintain adequate staffing resources to allow for efficient and effective emergency response to residents' with cardiopulmonary arrest, and failed to have effective systems in place for staff to obtain timely assistance during a CPR code. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm/Subsequent Death for Resident #13, #58 and #74. This affected three residents (#13, #58, and #74) of 22 residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 53. Immediate Jeopardy began…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-23 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, pest control invoice reviews, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 53 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:Observation on 08/18/25 at 9:47 A.M. with Regional Dietary Manager #598 revealed the outside facility dumpster area had three dumpsters with the lids closed. The area surrounding the dumpsters revealed loose debris including incontinence care items, used gloves and various loose trash scattered around on the ground around the dumpsters. Interview at the time of the observation with Regional Dietary Manager #598 confirmed the observation of trash on the ground surrounding the dumpster. Review of the facility pest control invoice dated 07/10/25 revealed noted sanitation issues including loose food debris found in the garbage area due to spilled food materials on the ground and could cause pest problems. Review of the facility pest control invoice dated 08/04/25 revealed the exterior garbage area trash can had loose food debris…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, job description review, and interview, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 53. Findings include: A review of the facility job description labeled Administrator revealed the purpose of the position was to establish and maintain systems that were effective and efficient to operate the facility in a manner to safely meet the residents' needs in compliance with federal, state, and local requirements. The job description further stated the administrator would determine the personnel requirements of the facility and hire or arrange for sufficient staff to implement the facility policies and procedures. The administrator would develop a monitoring system to assure compliance with federal, state and local requirements. Specific requirements were as follows: Established…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview the facility failed to ensure its Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee consisted of the required members. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 53. Findings include:A review of the document titled; Euclid Beach QAPI Members that was undated revealed the committee is made up of the following members: Committee Chairperson Administrator Director of Nursing Medical Director Dietary Representative Pharmacy Representative Social Service Representative Activities Representative Environmental Service Representative Infection Control Representative Rehabilitative/Restorative Services Representative Staff Development Representative Safety Representative and Medical Records Representative.A review of a document titled; QAPI Plan dated 01/30/25 revealed a QAPI Meeting was held. The document further revealed the meeting was attended by Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) #629 and Director of Nursing #623. There was no indication or sign in sheet to verify the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary homelike environment was provided for residents. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 53.Findings include:On 08/18/25 between 12:00 P.M. and 1:45 P.M. an initial observational tour of the building was conducted. room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted to have pealing wallpaper and a missing corner piece protector on the left side of the wall between the television stand and the bathroom that exposed the bare wall. The bathroom floor was noted to be coming up. A piece of vinyl approximately six foot by five foot was noted on the bathroom wall across from the toilet that was curved onto the left side of the wall. The toilet was noted to be dirty. There were two full urinals hanging off the garbage can by the bed. There were gnats crawling at the sink and in a wash basin. The aforementioned was verified by Housekeeping and Laundry Supervisor #550 at the time of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-23 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a complete orientation, including applicable training and facility-specific policies, was provided to newly hired Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and licensed nurses. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 53.Findings include:On 08/26/25 at 1:35 P.M. a review of personnel files was conducted with Human Resource Director (HRD) #520.A review of the personnel file for Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #545 revealed a date of hire (DOH) of 07/01/24. There was no completed clinical nursing assistant orientation form within the personnel file.A review of the personnel file for CNA #568 revealed a DOH of 05/24/25. There was no completed clinical nursing assistant orientation form within the personnel file.A review of the personnel file for CNA #558 revealed a DOH of 05/24/25. There was no completed clinical nursing assistant orientation form within the personnel file.HRD #520 verified the lack of clinical nursing assistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interviews, observation, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #3, #29, #45, #49, #53, #63, #41, #7, #44, #1, #2, and #5 were provided assistance with activities of daily living for showering. This affected 12 residents (#3, #29, #45, #49, #53, #63, #41, #7, #44, #1, #2, and #5) of 22 resident records reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility identified 44 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #16, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #25, #27, #29, #30, #32, #36, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #47, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #61, #62, and #63) who required staff assistance for showers and bathing. The facility census was 53. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an original admission date of 04/15/23. Diagnoses included but were not limited to end stage renal disease with dependence upon renal dialysis, type two diabetes mellitus with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, record review, and facility assessment review, the facility failed to maintain sufficient levels of competent staff to ensure residents received the care needed to maintain the highest quality of life. This affected two residents (#58 and #74) and had the potential to affect six additional residents (#22, #26, #31, #35, #46, and #61) who resided on the first floor unit of the facility. The facility census was 53.Findings include:1. Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), schizophrenia, depression, dependence on supplemental oxygen, heart disease, and a history of a stroke without residual effects from the stroke. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #74 revealed the following: An order dated [DATE] for one puff of a Ventolin inhaler every six hours as needed for asthma, and Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation Solution 0.5-2.5 milligrams…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications in the medication cart were labeled and stored in proper containers. This had the potential to affect 30 Residents (#2, #6, #8, #16, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #25, #26, #30, #31, #33, #35, #36, #37, #39, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #49, #50, #52, #60, and #61) who received medications from the medication carts reviewed. The facility census was 53. Findings include:Observation on 08/20/25 at 3:15 P.M. of the medication cart on the sycamore hall revealed there were 15 loose pills of various shapes and colors in the bottom of the medication cart. Interview on 08/20/25 at 3:15 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #606 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #559 confirmed 15 loose pills of various shapes and colors in the bottom of the medication cart for the sycamore hall. RN #606 & LPN #559 confirmed they were not able to identify the 15 pills nor to whom the 15 pills were prescribed. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-23 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the policy pertaining to use and storage of food in resident room refrigerators was implemented and addressed temperature monitoring for food safety. This affected four residents (Residents #4, # 9, #43, and #44) of four residents reviewed for personal food storage. The facility identified seven residents (Residents #4, #9, #16, #36, #43, #44 and #47) as storing food in room refrigerators. The facility census was 53. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 08/20/09. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, morbid obesity and polyneuropathy. Review of the 07/15/25 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #44 revealed he was cognitively intact, received a no added salt (NAS) diet, and required set up for meals. An observation on 08/21/25 at 1:45 P.M. with Regional Dietary Manager (RDM) #598 revealed Resident #44's refrigerator had a plastic sleeve on the outside of it with an undated temperature…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-23 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to have an updated and accurate facility assessment to indicate sufficient staffing for the first floor. This had the potential to affect six residents (#22, #26, #31, #35, #46 and #61) identified by the facility as residing on the first floor The facility census was 53.Findings include:A review of a document titled; Facility Assessment dated 02/24/25 was marked as reviewed by Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) #628. The document stated the reason for review was change in management/new administrator. The document was reviewed by the Quality Assurance Committee on 03/22/25. The purpose of the assessment was to determine what resources are necessary to care for the residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Under the subtitle, Facility Assessment and Staffing Needs it was stated the facility will consider specific staffing needs for each resident unit in the facility. Page 19 of the document had a subsection titled, Staffing Needs as per Resident Unit. The document stated to add…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 43 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medical record documentation included weekly skin assessments as ordered and care planned for Resident #1, #3, #7, #9, #29, #44, #45, #49, #53, #63, and #69, and failed to ensure the change of condition and subsequent death of Resident #76 was documented in the medical record. This affected 12 Residents (#1, #3, #7, #9, #29, #44, #45, #49, #53, #63, #69 and #76) of 22 residents reviewed for complete resident records. The facility census was 53. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to end stage renal disease with dependence upon renal dialysis, type two diabetes mellitus with retinopathy, morbid obesity, hemiplegia and hemiparesis. Review of the [DATE] physician order for Resident #3 revealed an order for a weekly skin assessment to be completed every Monday. Review of the [DATE] quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a catheter drainage bag was placed in a privacy bag to maintain dignity. This affected one resident (Resident #27) of three residents (Residents #4, #5 and #27) identified with urinary drainage systems. The Facility census was 53. Findings include:Review of medical records for Resident #27 revealed a date of admission of 05/07/25. Significant diagnoses included other mechanical complication of other urinary catheter, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Significant orders included indwelling foley catheter, change foley catheter every 28 days and as needed, empty foley catheter every shift, monitor urine for color, clarity, and odor, and consult urology for catheter change every 28 days. Review of the admission minimum data set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 was cognitively intact. The assessment also noted an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the care plan dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of resident changes in condition. This affected two residents (#13 and #85) of 22 residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 53.Findings include:1.Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, asthma, hemiplegia/hemiparesis after a stroke affecting the left nondominant side, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, rectal cancer, and heart disease. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #13 revealed an order written on [DATE] for the resident to be a full code (perform all life saving interventions). An order was written on [DATE] to admit to hospice with a terminal diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease and chronic kidney disease with heart failure. Hospice was to be notified of all changes, falls, medication errors, equipment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility did not ensure Resident #55's care plan was revised to include physician ordered oxygen therapy. This affected one resident (#55) of 22 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility identified three residents (#5, #39 and #55) who required oxygen therapy. The facility census was 53.Findings included:Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed a date of admission of 04/25/25 with diagnoses including emphysema and asthma. Review of Resident #55's physician orders revealed an order dated 05/23/25 for oxygen at two liters per minute via nasal cannula. Review of the quarterly minimum data set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 was cognitively intact. The assessment also revealed oxygen therapy in use. Review of the care plan, date initiated 04/29/25, revealed Resident #55 had emphysema and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Interventions included keep the head of the bed elevated for shortness of breath to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #29 was provided corrective lens and vision care appointments per physician orders. This affected one resident (Resident #29) of one resident reviewed for vision services. The facility census was 53.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus with proliferative diabetic retinopathy with bilateral macular edema.Review of the [DATE] quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #29 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of four out of 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #29 was noted under Section B to have adequate vision with corrective lenses. Review of the care plan for Resident #29 which was last reviewed on [DATE] revealed impaired visual function related to hypertension and diabetes. Interventions listed were to arrange consultation with an eye care practitioner as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, clinical nursing assistant orientation program staff sign off review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate supervision was provided for residents requiring supervision while smoking and failed to ensure residents did not have smoking items in their personal possession. This affected two residents (Resident #45 and #49) of three residents reviewed for smoking. The facility identified 26 residents (Residents #4, #5, #6, #7, #12, #13, #14, #15, #17, #18, #22, #26, #40, #41, #43, #44, #45, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #60, #61, and #63) who smoked. The facility census was 53. Findings include:Observation on 08/18/25 at 2:25 P.M. of the outside smoking area revealed three residents (Resident #45, #49 and #60) smoking outside without supervision. At the time of the observation, the Administrator confirmed residents were without staff supervision and stated he did not know if those resident's required supervision, but if they required supervised smoking, a staff member should have been present. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was dated as changed weekly for equipment management and infection control. This affected two residents (Resident #39 and Resident #55) of three residents (Residents #5, #39 and #55) identified by the facility as utilizing oxygen. The facility census was 53. Findings include:1. 1. A review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed a date of admission of 06/28/23. Significant diagnosis included acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia (a buildup of carbon dioxide in the bloodstream). Significant orders included oxygen at four liters per minute at bedtime and as needed to keep oxygen level above 92 percent, change oxygen tubing every Tuesday for respiratory equipment management and infection control. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was cognitively intact. The assessment also revealed oxygen therapy in use. Review of the care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure monthly pharmacy reviews were completed for two residents (Residents #4 and #53) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 53. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 09/08/23. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left non-dominant side, type II diabetes mellitus, history of suicidal behavior, alcohol abuse and cocaine abuse. Review of the physician order dated 01/29/25 for Resident #53 revealed an order for Sertraline Hydrochloride (an antidepressant) 75 milligrams (mg) mg by mouth one time a day for depression. Review of the physician order dated 04/01/25 for Resident #53 revealed an order for Depakote sprinkles (an anticonvulsant) capsule delayed release 125 mg, give one capsule by mouth two times a day for mood stabilization. Review of the physician order dated 05/02/25 for Resident #53 revealed an order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered labs were completed timely as required. This affected one resident (Resident #53) of 22 residents reviewed for physician orders. The facility census was 53. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 09/08/23. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left non-dominant side, type II diabetes mellitus, history of suicidal behavior, alcohol abuse and cocaine abuse. Review of the physician order dated 11/21/23 for Resident #53 revealed an order for a BMP (Basic Metabolic Panel) and CBC (Complete Blood Count) to be completed every three months with no further directions specified. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed no evidence of a BMP or CBC being completed on 07/15/25 as ordered. Review of the care plan last reviewed on 07/23/25 for Resident #53 revealed resident at risk for adverse effects related to use of psychoactive medications and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, facility policy review and review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Considerations for Preventing Spread of COVID-19, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control procedures to prevent the spread of infection. This affected one resident (#21) and had the potential to affect fifteen residents (#5, #9, #17, #18, #19, #22, #23, #26, #29, #32, #33, #35, #40, #42, #44) who resided on the Sycamore Unit (rooms 202 through 213). The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 06/17/21 with diagnoses including type II diabetes, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. Review of the care plan dated 10/31/23 revealed Resident #21 had signs and symptoms of coronavirus (COVID-19) positive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment and failed to perform repairs in a timely manner. This affected 16 residents (Resident #24, Resident #42, Resident #36, Resident #56, Resident #32, Resident #14, Resident #52, Resident #43, Resident #38, Resident #3, Resident #23, Resident #8, Resident #26, Resident #19, Resident #18 and Resident #33). The facility census was 60. Findings include: A tour of the facility on 08/15/23 from 11:30 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. revealed the following findings on the second floor of the facility: -The elevator metal door frame on the first floor and second floor of the facility had paint chipped with the metal beneath the paint exposed. Inside the elevator the back wall had gouges in the wall and the floor of the elevator had ground in black stains. - On the second floor of the facility the dining room entrance windows had bubbling paint around the windows and the molding along the base of the room and the heating vents were broken, loose and not attached to the wall. - There was water damaged flooring by the ice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a secure manner and medications where labeled with residents' names and date opened. This affected three residents (#48, #15 and #51) and had the potential to affect all 58 residents in the facility who received medications from medication carts 1, 2, 3 and 4. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #48 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included ataxia, muscle weakness, and unspecified mood disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/29/23 revealed Resident #48 was alert and oriented to person, place, time and required a one-person assist for activities of daily living. Observation on 04/04/23 at 8:18 A.M. of Resident #48's bedside table revealed two unidentified white pills, circular in shape, sitting in a small plastic cup. Interview on 04/04/23 at 8:18 A.M. with Resident #48 revealed she was provided the pills by overnight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment for residents. This affected five residents (#10, #16, #21, #54 and #164) of 58 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 04/04/23 from 9:45 A.M. to 10:05 A.M. environmental observations revealed the following concerns: Resident #10 had approximately 10 strips of clothing/fabric hanging over the electrical outlet and the baseboard heating unit of the room. The base baseboard molding located by Resident #16's headboard was peeled back and hanging from the wall. There was also a drywall patch behind the headboard that needed sanding; the drywall plaster was uneven and spread haphazardly over the patch. Observation of Resident #21 and #54's room revealed the baseboard heater did not have a cover over the heating elements. On 04/04/23 at 1:38 P.M. interview with the Administrator and Maintenance staff verified the above findings. 2. On 04/03/23 at 10:37 A.M. Resident #164's privacy curtain was observed to have dark brown stains and splatter marks on the left bottom…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-04-06 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — widespread
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement safe and responsible smoking practices and policies. This affected one resident (#48) of one resident reviewed for smoking and had the potential to affect all 58 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #48 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included ataxia, muscle weakness, and unspecified mood disorder. Review of a smoking safety screen assessment. dated 12/19/22 revealed Resident #48 was safe to smoke without supervision upon admission. Further review of the assessment revealed Resident #48 required supervision to smoke during assigned smoke breaks, although she was an independent smoker. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/29/23 revealed Resident #48 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and required one-person assist for activities of daily living. Review of the care plan dated 04/01/23 revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #48 was treated with respect and dignity. This affected one resident (#48) of one resident reviewed for resident rights. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #48 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included ataxia, muscle weakness, and unspecified mood disorder. Review of a progress note dated 02/14/23 at 12:05 P.M. revealed Resident #48 requested assistance regarding Social Security benefits from Former Social Services (FSS) #900. FSS #900 changed the time for Resident #48 to meet with her and Resident #48 became verbally aggressive. FSS #900 informed Resident #48 she was disrespectful, and her behavior was unacceptable. Review of a progress note dated 02/15/23 at 11:00 A.M. revealed Resident #48 went to FSS #900's office and asked if they were going to continue to work on her Social Security benefits by stating are we going to make the call or what. FSS #900 told…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #48 was screened for services and placement in the nursing facility. The facility also failed to notify the appropriate State agency (the Ohio Department of Mental Health) when two residents (#4 and #48) with a level two mental illness had a significant change in condition. This affected two residents (#4 and #48) of two residents reviewed for Pre-admission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR). The facility census was 58. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #48 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included ataxia, muscle weakness, and unspecified mood disorder. Review of a PASARR evaluation dated 01/04/23 revealed Resident #48 had a level two mental illness. In addition, the PASARR result notice dated 01/04/23 revealed a referral was made for a level two evaluation. Further review of Resident #48's hard chart and electronic medical record (EMR) revealed no level two evaluation results.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-06 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #48 received timely assistance with applying for Social Security benefits from social service staff. This affected one resident (#48) of one resident reviewed for resident rights. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #48 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included ataxia, muscle weakness, and unspecified mood disorder. Review of a progress note dated 02/14/23 at 12:05 P.M. revealed Resident #48 requested assistance regarding Social Security benefits from Former Social Services (FSS) #900. FSS #900 changed the time for Resident #48 to meet with her and Resident #48 became verbally aggressive. FSS #900 informed Resident #48 she was disrespectful, and her behavior was unacceptable. Review of a progress note dated 02/15/23 at 11:00 A.M. revealed Resident #48 went to FSS #900's office and asked if they were going to continue to work on her Social Security benefits by stating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-10-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, review of personnel files and the abuse policy and procedure, the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures to include screening of all employees against the State of Ohio Nurse Aide Registry to identify if an employee had a finding concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of resident property and failed to obtain reference checks. This affected six employee files (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #103, LPN #301, Director of Admissions #54, Housekeeping Assistant #82, Human Resource Director (HRD) #100 and the Administrator) of eleven personnel files reviewed for screening against the State of Ohio Nurse Aide Registry and four employee files (LPN #301, State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #35, STNA #151 and Floor Technician #83) of eleven personnel files reviewed for reference checks. This had the potential to affect all 112 residents residing in the facility resulting in substandard quality care. Findings include: Review of eleven personnel files revealed six staff were not checked against the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-10-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands between handling soiled floor mats and clean steam table pans. This had the potential to affect 105 residents out of a census of 112. Residents #27, #47, #61, #65, #69, #86 and #106 did not receive receive meals from the kitchen. Findings included: During the dinner tray line observation on 10/05/19 at 5:25 P.M. Staff #66 was noted to pick-up two debris laden rubber floor mats off of the floor and take them to the back of the kitchen near the dirty dish area. He then sprayed the mats down and put them back near the tray line. The mats still contained debris. He then placed three clean steam table pans beneath the steam table onto a stack of other clean pans without first washing his hands. This observation was verified with the Dietary Manager (DM) at the time of the observation. The DM removed the pans and placed them in the dirty dish area.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-10-09 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical director was an active participant of the Quality Assurance (QA) Committee. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the facilities sign-in sheet for the QA meeting minutes for the meetings held in June 2019, July 2019, August 2019 and September 2019 revealed no evidence the medical director attended the meetings. Interview with the Administrator on 10/09/19 at 3:25 P.M. verified the medical director did not attend the QA meetings as required.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-10-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand washing was performed during care of a resident on isolation precautions, personal protective equipment was properly disposed of, proper signage was posted regarding the need for isolation precautions, and biohazardous waste was properly disposed of. This affected one (Resident #43) of one resident reviewed for isolation precautions and had the potential to affect all 112 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and a Clostridium Difficile (a highly contagious bacteria) infection of the stool. A Minimum Data Set Assessment 3.0 (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she had severe cognitive impairment, and needed extensive assistance for most activities of daily living including toileting. She was totally dependent on staff for transfers and eating. Review of physician orders dated 09/24/19 revealed Resident #43 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-09 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment was coded correctly for Resident #48 for vision, Resident #34 for medications, Resident #115 for discharge location, Resident #12 for refusal of care and Resident #5 for life expectancy. This effected five of 35 Residents (#5, #8, #12, #14, #16, #23, #26, #27, #34, #37, #43, #48, #51, #57, #58, #61, #64, #66, #75, #78, #79, #82, #92, #97, #99, #103, #104, #107, #108, #109, #111, #113, #115, #163 and #313) reviewed for assessment accuracy. The facility census was 112. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including psychosis, symbolic dysfunction, abnormality of gait, altered mental status, insomnia and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented the residents vision was adequate, and she had no corrective lens. Interview on 10/06/19 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the envionment was manintained in a clean manner and in good repair for all residents. This affected 27 (Residents #9, #10, #11, #12, #22, #34, #35, #55, #56, #57, #58, #61, #62, #65, #68, #69, #80, #86, #87, #93, #96, #97, #98, #99, #112, #163 and #365) of 112 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: An environmental tour was conducted on 10/09/19 between 9:45 A.M. and 10:33 A.M. with Housekeeping Supervisor (HSK) #6 and Maintenance Director (MD) #15. The following concerns were observed and verified during the tour by HSK #6 and MD #15; • The room belonging to Residents #10 and #93 contained a stained privacy curtain. • The room belonging to Residents #56 and #62 contained multiple holes in the walls. • The rooms belonging to Residents #69 and #97 contained tube feeding poles with a significant amount of dried and caked on tube feeding liquid. • The room belonging to Resident #99 contained bed sheets with large stains of unknown substances. • The rooms belonging to Residents #9, #65, #68…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-09 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #107 had care plan meetings as required. This affected one (Resident #107) of two residents reviewed for care plan meetings. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #107 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic viral hepatitis C, retention of urine and prostate cancer. Resident #107 was interviewed on 10/06/19 at 11:32 A.M. and stated he had not been invited to or participated in any care plan meetings since he was admitted . Further review of the medical record for Resident #107 revealed no documentation that any care plan meetings had been held. Social Worker (SW) #89 was interviewed on 10/08/19 at 10:00 A.M. and stated resident care conferences were held quarterly. SW #89 verified on 10/08/19 at 10:59 A.M. that no care conferences had been held with Resident #107 since his admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate advanced directive information was present throughout the medical record for Resident #12. This affected one of one resident (Resident #12) reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, Alper's disease (a progressive neurological disorder), paranoid schizophrenia and psychosis. Review of the physician's orders for October 2019 revealed Resident #12 was a full code. Further review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed a red sheet of paper under the advanced directive tab with do not resuscitate comfort care (DNRCC) printed on it. Registered Nurse (RN) #158 was interviewed on 10/09/19 at 11:24 A.M. and verified Resident #12's code status was DNRCC, and the physician's order for full code was incorrect.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-09 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) form was given to Resident #73 upon the discontinuation of skilled services. This affected one (Resident #73) of three residents reviewed for proper notices of non-coverage. The facility census was 112. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed Resident #73 was given a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) on 09/26/18 indicating skilled services was would be discontinued on 09/28/19. Review of census records revealed Resident #73 remained in the facility. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #73 did not receive a SNF ABN as required. Interview with Social Worker #89 on 10/08/19 at 10:55 A.M. verified the lack of notice. He stated he was unaware that a SNF ABN form needed to be issued when residents remained in the facility and were discontinued from Medicare services.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and physician notes, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was initiated for a resident admitted with a chronic cough. This affected one resident (Resident #64) of 35 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses included respiratory failure with hypoxia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, cerebral infarction, tracheostomy and type II diabetes. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. She required extensive assistance of two staff for most activities of daily living including transfers, toilet use and personal hygiene. Review of the nurse practitioner notes dated 09/10/19 indicated the resident was evaluated for a low grade temperature of 99.1 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The note stated the resident was having a frequent most cough. Per this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents care plans were updated to meet the residents needs. This affected one resident (Resident #43) of 35 residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His admitting diagnoses included epilepsy, heart failure, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, dementia and Clostridium Difficile (C. Diff), a highly contagious bacteria, in the stool. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. She required extensive assistance for most activities of daily living, including toileting. She was totally dependent on staff for transfers and eating. Review of the physician's orders revealed on 09/24/19 she was diagnosed with C. Diff in her stool, and she was placed on isolation precautions. Review of the resident's plan of care dated 09/30/19 indicated Resident #43 was on contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-09 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and accurate discharge for Resident #313 . This affected one resident (Resident #313) of two residents reviewed for the discharge process. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #313 revealed an admission date of 06/17/19. Her admitting diagnoses included type II diabetes, pneumonia, heart failure, hypothyroidism and atrial fibrillation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident was alert and oriented. She required supervision of one staff for most activities of daily living, including personal hygiene and toileting. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/06/19 at 9:30 A.M. revealed that residents, depending on their insurance, can be discharged with their medications from the medication cart. She stated the discharging nurse will reconcile the discharge medications against the resident's medication card to make sure the resident is getting the correct…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was intervention for prevention of functional decline in abilities for Resident #48, who declined in bed mobility, transfers, eating and toileting. This affected one of six (Resident's #5, #48, #75, #99, #109, and #163) reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 112. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including sarcoidosis, psychosis, symbolic dysfunction, abnormality of gait, difficulty in walking, peptic ulcer, altered mental status, insomnia, dementia with behavioral disturbance, hypertension and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident required supervision for bed mobility and toileting, and she was independent with transfers and eating. Review of the 07/31/19 MDS 3.0 assessment revealed the resident required extensive assistance for bed mobility and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #75) received nail care of five Residents (#16, #75, #99, #109, and #163) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 112. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, vascular dementia without behavior disturbance, major depression, other specific joint derangements. Review of the annual comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident required extensive assistance of one staff for personal hygiene. On 10/06/19 at 11:20 A.M. observation of the resident revealed his left arm was contracted at the wrist and elbow. The resident had full use of the right hand. The right hand was noted to have long dirty finger nails. With the contractures of the left hand, the resident would not be able to clean or clip his nails. Interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-09 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #48 was provided with glasses after a vision exam indicated she required them. This effected one of one resident reviewed for vision. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including psychosis, symbolic dysfunction, abnormality of gait, altered mental status, insomnia and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident's vision was adequate, and she had no corrective lens. Interview on 10/06/19 at 9:38 A.M. with the residents responsible party revealed the resident was admitted with glasses, but they have disappeared. She was unsure if the resident had been seen for vision consult. Review of the resident record revealed the resident was seen for a vision exam on 11/07/18 and had a prescription for glasses. Interview on 10/08/19 at 10:18 A.M. with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #78's right hand splint was applied correctly. This effected one of one resident reviewed for positioning. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer's disease, hypothyroidism, dysphagia, symbolic dysfunction and cerebral vascular accident. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and no splinting devices. Review of the physicians telephone orders dated 09/19/19 stated the resident was to wear bilateral resting hand splints at all times. Interview on 10/06/19 at 10:20 A.M. with the residents spouse revealed she thought the splints had been applied by the state tested nursing assistants (STNA's). The surveyor observed the resident was wearing bilateral hand splints, a left elbow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-09 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of personnel files, the facility failed to ensure performance reviews were completed every 12 months and failed to ensure State Tested Nurse Aides (STNA) completed 12 hours of in-service education every twelve months. This affected two (STNA #131 and #166) of five STNA personnel files reviewed. Findings include: Review of five STNA personnel files revealed two STNA's #131 and #166 had been employed over a year. STNA #131 was hired on 01/09/00 and had no evidence of annual evaluations until this day, 10/09/19. STNA #166 was hired 01/09/13 and had no evidence of annual evaluations. Human Resource Director (HRD) #100 provided a performance evaluation indicating her date of hire was 06/06/19 and was not due for a three month evaluation until 09/02/19. Interview with HRD #100 verified annual evaluations were not completed on 10/09/19 at 4:30 P.M. Review of STNA #166's personnel file had no evidence she was provided 12 hours of in-service education annually. Interview with HRD #100 on 10/09/19 at 4:30 P.M. verified there was no documented evidence of STNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a residents was discharged with the correct medication. This affected one resident (Resident #313) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record of Resident #313 revealed an admission date of 06/17/19. Her admitting diagnoses included type II diabetes, pneumonia, heart failure, hypothyroidism and atrial fibrillation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was alert and oriented. She required supervision of one staff for most activities of daily living, including personal hygiene and toileting. Review of the discharge medications revealed she was ordered the following medications: • Amlodipine (medication to treat high blood pressure and chest pain) 10 milligrams (mg) daily • Aspirin (blood thinner) 81 mg by mouth daily • Doxazosin (medication to treat urinary retention and high blood pressure) 2 mg take one tablet by mouth daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review monthly pharmacy recommendations and interview, the facility failed to ensure a gradual dose reduction was attempted for Resident #108. This affected one resident (Resident #108) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #108 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses included urinary tract infections, sickle cell trait, gout, vascular dementia, type II diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #108's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. She required extensive assistance for bed mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Resident #108 was totally dependent on staff for transfers and locomotion on and off the unit. Review of the medication assessment from the MDS revealed the resident received seven injections of insulin, received an antidepressant seven of seven days, an antipsychotic seven…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-01-31 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure annual performance evaluations were completed for all state tested nursing assistants (STNA's). This had the potential to affect all 55 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of STNA #204's personnel file revealed a hire date of 06/08/22. There was no annual performance evaluation noted in her file. Interview on 01/31/24 at 12:26 P.M. with the Administrator verified STNA #204 did not have an annual performance evaluation in her file. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00150100.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-01-31 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was posted. This had the potential to affect all 55 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation and interview on 01/30/24 at 9:03 A.M. with the Business Office Manager (BOM) #200 of the daily posted staffing revealed the last posted staffing information was dated 01/25/24. There were additional staffing sheets placed behind the one dated 01/25/24 and were noted to be dated for 01/06/24, 01/07/24, 01/08/24, 01/09/24, 01/10/24, 01/11/24, 01/18/24, 01/22/24 and 01/24/24. BOM #200 verified daily staffing was not posted since 01/25/24. Interview on 01/30/24 at 10:00 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed she was responsible for posting the daily nurse staffing. She stated she had taken the staffing sheets with her and had not posted them so they would be available for residents and visitors to view.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-04-06 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the State Ombudsman was notified of resident transfers to the hospital. This affected three residents (#4, #19 and #164) and had the potential to affect all 58 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spondylosis, malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive, dementia, hypertension, irritable bowel syndrome, insomnia, incisional hernia, dysthymic disorder (mild form of depression), colon cancer, and migraine. Review of the nursing progress note dated 02/17/23 at 1:43 P.M. revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the hospital for suicidal ideations. Review of the electronic medical record revealed no evidence the State Ombudsman was notified of Resident #4's transfer to the hospital. Interview with the Administrator on 04/04/23 at 6:30 P.M. confirmed the facility did not notify the State Ombudsman of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-10-09 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have three years of state survey results, including complaint investigations, readily accessible to residents and the general public. This had the potential to affect all 112 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's public survey results book on 10/06/19 at 1:20 P.M. revealed a complaint survey dated 02/15/18 was the last survey included in the book. The Ohio Department of Health conducted surveys at the facility on 04/24/18, 07/12/18, 08/07/18 (violations issued), 10/04/18 (violations issued), 11/20/18, 12/03/18 (violations issued), 01/09/19, 03/25/19, 05/14/19 (violations issued), 06/11/19, 07/15/18, 08/05/19 and 09/05/19. The results of these surveys were not included in the survey book at the time of observation. On 10/06/19 at 3:05 P.M., the Administrator verified the survey results for the surveys listed above were not present in the book and readily available for review.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2019-10-09 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure posted nursing staff information was updated in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Observation of the posted nursing staff information on 10/06/19 at 8:00 A.M. revealed the posted nursing staff information was from 10/04/19. Registered Nurse (RN) #128 verified the posted nursing staff information was not up to date in an interview on 10/06/19 at 8:15 A.M.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2019-10-09 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment contained all required information. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 112. Findings Include: Review of the facility assessment revealed the following: • All of the documentation in the assessment was on the previous owners letter head. • The census information contained in the assessment was out of date (from October 2018). • Contracts, memorandums of understanding, or other agreements with third parties to provide services or equipment to the facility during both normal operations and emergencies were noted to be for the previous owners of the facility, and no updated contracts were noted. Interview with the Administrator on 10/6/19 at 10:45 A.M. verified the above findings.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2019-10-09 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure monthly physician's orders were signed and dated as required. This affected three (Residents #14, #111 and #114) of twenty eight residents reviewed. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical records for Resident's #14, #111 and #114 on 10/07/19 between 1:00 P.M. and 2:00 P.M. revealed the monthly physician's orders were not signed for April 2019, May 2019, June 2019, July 2019, August 2019 and September 2019. Corporate Nurse #400 verified the lack of signatures in an interview on 10/07/19 at 2:05 P.M.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$200,605 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $200,605 — penalty dated 2025-09-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EPHRAM LAHASKY — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.0+2.0 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
EUCLID OPCO MEMBER LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/03/2022
BIGGS, KARINIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/31/2021
KATZ, LARRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/31/2021
LAHASKY, EPHRAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/31/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-20.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$593K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 35%Medicare 0%Other / private 65%

This home reported $593K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$329per resident / day
operating cost
$9,989per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$274per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365594. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next