Minerva Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 32 beds and averages 18.1 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pre-employment tuberculosis (TB) testing was completed timely for all new staff and new residents received TB testing on admission. This affected one resident (Resident #7) out of three residents reviewed for TB control with the potential to affect all 15 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:1. Review of the employee file of Housekeeper (HK) #202 revealed she had a hire date of 03/27/26. HK #202's employee file revealed she had not received TB testing before working at the facility. Interview on 04/14/26 at 8:43 A.M. with HK #202 revealed she had worked at the facility a little over two weeks. She stated she had not had her TB testing completed since she was hired. Interview on 04/14/26 at 10:29 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #200 verified HK #202 had not received her tuberculin skin test on hire. Interview on 04/14/26 at 11:01 A.M. with Human Resources Director (HR) #211 verified the process for new hires receiving TB testing.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed timely for Residents #4, #7, #16, #18, and #24. This affected five residents (#4, #7, #16, #18, and #24) of 15 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 16.Findings include:1. Record review for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 11/20/25 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, senile degeneration of the brain, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and unspecified psychosis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was cognitively impaired and was receiving hospice services. Review of Resident #7's interim care plan assessment, dated 11/20/25, revealed hospice/end of life care provided. Review of Resident #7's comprehensive care plan, dated 11/20/25, revealed no hospice care plan. Interview on 01/20/26 at 4:23 P.M. with Licensed Practice Nurse (LPN) #211 revealed hospice residents had a hospice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, observations, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to respect the dignity of residents by failing to empty a urinal in full view of the hallway or cover a urinary catheter drainage bag. This affected two (Resident #16 and Resident #3) of two residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 16.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 12/24/25. Diagnoses included cellulitis of left lower limb, type two diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity due to excess calories, difficulty walking, lack of coordination, unspecified injury of the kidney, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, acute diastolic heart failure, chronic embolism and thrombosis, obstructive sleep apnea, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, essential hypertension, chronic pain syndrome, anemia, and cannabis abuse. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed a Minimal Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/05/26, revealed a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a complete and accurate baseline care plan for Resident #25. This affect one resident (#25) of 15 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 16.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 01/14/26. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonia, essential hypertension, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of progress notes for Resident #25 revealed an admission note, dated 01/14/26, which indicated the resident had a boney prominence to sacrum which was reddened, but not open, and applied house zinc to the area.Review of a care plan for Resident #25, dated 01/14/26, failed to reveal any evidence of oxygen care planning or interventions. Further, the care plan failed to reveal any evidence of wound care planning or interventions.Review of orders for January 2026 for Resident #25 revealed no oxygen or wound care orders on admission. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line (a long, thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein and threaded into a large vein near the heart) dressing was changed as ordered by the physician for Resident #24. This affected one resident (#24) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 16.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 01/14/26 with diagnoses including pneumonia, urinary tract infection, heart failure, bacteremia (bacteria in the blood), and respiratory failure.Review of the interim care plan dated 01/15/26 revealed Resident #24 needed assistance with activities of daily living.Review of the care plan dated 01/15/26 revealed the absence of central line focus and associated interventions.Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 01/16/26 revealed Resident #24 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program for Resident #25. This affected one (Resident #25) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 16.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 01/14/26. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonia, essential hypertension, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of progress notes for Resident #25 revealed an admission note, dated 01/14/26, which indicated the resident had a boney prominence to the sacrum, which was reddened, but not open, and applied house zinc to the area. Review of the admission physician's orders dated 01/14/26 revealed no wound care orders for Resident #25.Review of a care plan for Resident #25, dated 01/14/26, revealed the resident was to have enhanced barrier precautions (EBP)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure orders were obtained for residents requiring oxygen administration. This affected two (Resident #5 and Resident #25) of three residents reviewed for oxygen use. The facility census was 16.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 11/20/23. Diagnoses included diverticulitis of intestine, asthma, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, assistance with personal care, wedge compression fracture of the third vertebra; depression, parkinsonism, rheumatoid arthritis, and muscle wasting.Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 12/31/25, revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 on a 0-15 scale. A score of 15 would indicate the resident had intact cognitive function, or normal thinking and memory. The MDS also indicated the resident was dependent in all activities of daily living.Review of a care plan for Resident #5, dated 01/04/26, revealed a focus of care for oxygen therapy related to ineffective gas…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, interviews and reviews of facility policies, the facility failed to follow proper infection control processes during incontinence care and blood glucose testing for Resident #3 and wound care for Resident #25. This affected two (Residents #25 and #3) of four residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 16.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 01/14/26. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonia, essential hypertension, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #25, dated 01/15/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 on a 0-15 scale. A BIMS score of 13 indicated intact cognitive functioning, or normal thinking and memory. On 01/22/26 at 2:35 P.M., an observation of wound care for Resident #25 revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #202…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #27's Gabapentin medication was not administered to Resident #21. This finding affected two (Residents #21 and #27) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE] with diagnoses including encounter for orthopedic aftercare, cerebral palsy and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #21's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. Review of Resident #21's physician orders revealed an order dated [DATE] for Gabapentin oral tablet 800 mg (milligrams) give one tablet by mouth four times a day for 120 days due at 12:00 A.M., 6:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M. and 6:00 P.M.; and an order dated [DATE] to give Gabapentin 600 mg one time only for nerve pain for one day. Review of Resident #21's progress note dated [DATE] at 3:03 P.M. authored by Licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-07-25 · tag F0680 — widespread
  Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of personnel files and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Activities Director #112 was qualified to direct the facility activities program. This had the potential to affect all 23 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Activities Director #112, who also served as the facility's Social Services Designee, revealed a hire date of 10/29/22. There was no evidence of completion of a certification or training program for leading activities programs in long term care centers. On 07/23/24 at 1:20 P.M., an interview with the Administrator stated Activities Director #112 was the only activities staff for the facility. On 07/23/24 at 2:17 P.M., an interview with Human Resources Director #114 stated Activities Director #112 began her role as the facility's Activities Director on 02/15/24 and she was unsure what training was provided. The Administrator, who was standing nearby, stated Activities Director #112 was trained by the former staff member who previously filled that role. On 07/23/24 at 2:37 P.M., an interview with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EPHRAM LAHASKY — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $69K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH