Gardens Of Belden Village
5005 Higbee Avenue NW, Canton, OH 44718 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (330) 492-7835 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 0.9% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 58.7% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.2% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 0.9% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.1% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.6% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.3% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.0% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.2% | 8.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.4% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.7% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.2% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 86.7 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure effective measures/systems were in place to prevent resident falls with injury. The facility failed to ensure Resident #38 was transferred appropriately using a gait belt and failed to ensure Resident #48's bed U-bar side rail was maintained in good repair. This affected two residents (#38 and #48) of four residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. Actual harm occurred on 09/25/24 at 9:40 A.M. to Resident #38, when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #831 attempted to transfer Resident #38 from a bedside commode to the wheelchair without using a gait belt as care planned. Resident #38 and STNA #831 fell to the floor. Resident #38 sustained a fractured hip which required surgical repair and had chronic pain post surgical repair. Actual harm occurred on 06/08/24 at 3:47 P.M. when during resident care, Resident #48 grabbed the multi-function side rail (U-bar) attached to her bed to pull herself over, the side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to dispose of expired foods in a timely manner which resulted in expired food being served to residents. This had the potential to affect all 80 residents that received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 80.Findings include: On 04/01/26 at 11:00 A.M., an observation of the kitchen revealed one unopened case of Thick and Easy apple juice that expired on 02/17/26, one unopened case of Thick and Easy cranberry juice that expired on 02/19/26, and one opened case of Thick and Easy orange juice that expired on 03/14/26. An interview at the time of observation with Dietary Manager #887 verified the expired thickened beverages. Dietary Manager #887 also confirmed that expired food had been served to residents in January 2026 when there was a winter storm and the dietary staff utilized food items from the emergency food supply, which included a case of individual cups of peaches that had been expired for several months. Dietary Manager #887 stated staff were unaware that expired food had been served to residents until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the laundry cart used to transport clean clothing/linens from the washing machines to the dryers did not have water dripping into them from a leak in the ceiling. This had the potential to affect all 80 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:An observation on 04/01/26 at 9:04 A.M. revealed there was water dripping from the ceiling above the washing machines. The ceiling tiles had brownish color, and the metal crossbars were rusted. Some of the water dripping was pooling in a cart used to transport clean laundry from the washers to the dryers. Several damp looking bath towels were lying on the floor. Housekeeper/Laundry Supervisor #847 verified water was dripping from the ceiling and pooling in the cart used to transport clean laundry. Housekeeper/Laundry Supervisor #847 stated the ceiling leaked when it rained. As surveyor walked from the laundry area to the dryer area, and water dripped on the surveyor's head. An interview on 04/01/26 at 11:41 A.M. Maintenance Director #854 verified the ceiling above…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, hospital record review, review of guidance from the American Diabetes Association (ADA), review of guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), review of guidance from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), review of guidance from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Library of Medicine's MedlinePlus information, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to adequately monitor Resident #42's diabetes; failed to ensure medications were available for Resident #99's use; failed to ensure adequate indication for blood sugar testing (finger sticks) for Resident #33; failed to ensure skin assessments and treatments were in place for Residents #27, #35 and #62; failed to ensure testing instructions were followed for Resident #7; and failed to ensure urinalysis lab testing was completed as ordered for Resident #6. This affected eight (Residents #42, #99, #33, #27, #35, #62, #7, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #64 and #66 were provided with dignity during meals. This finding affected two (Residents #64 and #66) of five residents reviewed for dignity and respect during meals. The facility census was 80.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteomyelitis of vertebra, dysphagia, generalized anxiety disorder, dementia, heart failure, unspecified psychosis, anemia, history of stroke, and history of venous thrombosis/embolism. Review of Resident #66's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. Review of Resident #66's physician orders revealed an order dated 03/20/26 and again on 04/04/26 for a regular diet, mechanical soft texture with nectar thickened liquids consistency. Observation on 03/30/26 at 9:44 A.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #890 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan with relevant interventions for Resident #77. This affected one (Resident #77) out of one resident reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 80.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 03/04/26 with diagnoses including psychoactive substance abuse, depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder.Review of the elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77 was at low risk for elopement with a score of 9.0. There were no additional elopement risk assessments available for review.Review of the progress note dated 03/21/26 at 8:01 P.M. revealed Resident #77 demanded to leave the facility and went outside the building. Facility staff called Resident #77's guardian who spoke to Resident #77 and informed her she was not allowed to leave the facility per the local probate court. Resident #77 was returned to the facility, and a Wanderguard was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan to accurately reflect the status of Resident #26. This affected one (Resident #26) out of three residents reviewed for catheter use. The facility census was 80.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 10/09/25 with diagnoses including cellulitis of abdominal wall, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type two diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, depression, heart failure, chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stage III, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), hypothyroidism, restless legs syndrome, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), generalized anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder.Review of the catheter care plan dated 01/28/26 revealed Resident #26 had an indwelling catheter related to urinary retention. Interventions included 16 French 10 milliliter catheter with bag and tubing positioned below the level of the bladder and away from the entrance room door implemented 01/28/26, check tubing for kinks each shift implemented 01/28/26, maintain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #64's eyes were free of debris and Resident #26 received showers as scheduled. This finding affected two (Residents #26 and #64) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 80.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 10/09/25 with diagnoses including cellulitis of abdominal wall, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type two diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, depression, heart failure, chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stage III, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), hypothyroidism, restless legs syndrome, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), generalized anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder. Review of the care plan dated 10/20/25 revealed Resident #26 had a self-care deficit related to decreased functional mobility. Interventions included grooming and hygiene assistance of one staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1's oxygen tubing was stored in the proper manner when not in use. This affected one (Resident #1) out of one reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute kidney failure, congestive heart failure (CHF), transient cerebral ischemic attack, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A plan of care dated 04/12/24 revealed Resident #1 received oxygen therapy. Interventions included changing oxygen tubing and oxygen settings via nasal cannula as ordered. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had severely impaired cognitive skills. Resident #1 received oxygen therapy. A physician order dated 01/08/26 revealed Resident #1's oxygen saturation was to be monitored every day and night shift. A physician order dated 02/11/26 revealed Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1's oxygen tubing was stored in the proper manner when not in use. This affected one (Resident #1) out of one reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 80. Findings include:Review of the medical revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute kidney failure, congestive heart failure, transient cerebral ischemic attack, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A plan of care dated 04/12/24 revealed Resident #1 received oxygen therapy. Interventions included to change oxygen tubing and oxygen settings via nasal cannula as ordered. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had severely impaired cognitive skills. The MDS also revealed Resident #1 received oxygen therapy. A physician order dated 01/08/26 revealed Resident #1's oxygen saturation was to be monitored every day and night shift. A physician order dated 02/11/26 revealed Resident #1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #100 had pain medication available. This affected one (Resident #100) out of six residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 80. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #100 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cellulitis, type II diabetes, morbid obesity, ventral hernia with obstruction, and venous thrombosis and embolism. Resident #100 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the discharge record from the hospital revealed a paper copy of the prescription for oxycodone (opioid for severe pain) five milligram (mg) every six hours as needed for up to three days. A general progress note dated 07/19/25 at 8:54 A.M. revealed Resident #100 arrived at the facility via a stretcher on 07/18/25 at 8:30 P.M. from the hospital. The resident complained of pain and discomfort due to an abdominal incision. The nursing admit/readmit care plan dated 07/19/25 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to monitor and maintain adequate communication with the outside dialysis center to include vital signs and weights before and after dialysis and failed to ensure the facility had a dialysis policy. This affected one (Resident #7) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified Resident #7 as the only resident receiving dialysis in the facility. The facility census was 80.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 11/28/25. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, dependency on dialysis, type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, vascular dementia and cognitive communication deficit.Review of the physician orders for March 2026 revealed an order for hemodialysis every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday morning with transport pick up at 9:40 A.M. and chair time of 10:45 A.M. to an outside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the American Diabetes Association's (ADA's) information on A1C and estimated average glucose (eAG), review of the facility policy and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician provided comprehensive care for Resident #42. This affected one (Resident #42) out of three residents reviewed for physician's services. The facility census was 80.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 01/09/26 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, acute kidney failure, chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stage III, vascular dementia, and cognitive communication deficit.Review of the hospital records dated 12/29/25 through 01/09/26 (prior to admission) revealed Resident #42 had blood sugar levels ranging from 100 to 294 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL), had a urine glucose reading of 3+, received insulin glargine (long-acting insulin)10 units daily at bedtime, insulin lispro (rapid-acting insulin) 0 to 5 units sliding scale with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure individual patient-controlled substance administration records and medication administration records were accurate for Resident #99. This affected one (Resident #99) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #99 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy, psychoactive substance abuse, obstructive hydrocephalus, nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, and schizoaffective disorder. Resident #99 was discharged home on [DATE]. The facility physician orders dated 08/03/25 revealed Resident #99 was ordered oxycodone (opioid for moderate to severe pain) 5 milligrams (mg) every eight hours as needed. The individual patient-controlled substance administration record date 08/03/25 revealed Resident #99 was ordered 1/2 tab (2.5 mg) every eight hours as needed; two half tablets (5 mg) every eight hours as needed. The medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the McGreer Criteria and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #33 did not receive unnecessary antibiotics. This affected one (Resident #33) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 80.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #33 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute embolism and thrombosis deep vein of right lower leg, type II diabetes mellitus, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis. A physician order dated 03/03/26 revealed Resident #33 was ordered nitrofurantoin/Macrobid (antibiotic) 100 milligram (mg) every morning and at bedtime for urinary tract infection (UTI) prophylactic for prevention. The infection control log revealed Resident #33 had an onset date of a UTI on 03/03/26. There was an unknown pathogen and nitrofurantoin/Macrobid was ordered. The revised McGeer Criteria for infection surveillance checklist revealed the date of infection was 03/03/36 and the date of review was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, review of photos and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at bedside of Resident #7. This affected one (Resident #7) of one resident reviewed for unsecured medications. The facility census was 80.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 11/28/25. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, dependency on dialysis, type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, vascular dementia and cognitive communication deficit.Review of the physician orders for December 2025 revealed an order for Chlorhexidine Gluconate Mouth/Throat Solution 0.12% (antiseptic) to give 15 milliliters (ml) by mouth (PO) every morning and at bedtime for teeth extractions to swish and spit. Review of the photos provided by Resident #7's guardian, dated 12/20/25 at 7:32 A.M. revealed a medicine cup on Resident #7's over the bed tray with one capsule in it and a plastic drinking cup with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #7's medical record was accurate and complete. This finding affected one (Resident #7) of three residents reviewed for accuracy of medical records. The facility census was 80.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end state renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and diabetes. The medical record revealed the resident's daughter was the legal guardian and power-of-attorney (POA) for health care and financial.Review of Resident #7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. Review of Resident #7's physician orders revealed an order dated 01/01/26 (discontinued 01/05/26) for hospice services.Review of Resident #7's Hospice Patient Medication Cover Sheet form dated 01/01/26 revealed the resident was ordered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to implement personal protective equipment (PPE) as required during care of Residents #45 and #62 who were in contact isolation precautions. The facility also failed to put the correct infection control precautions in place when Resident #62 was admitted . This finding affected two (Residents #45 and #62) of three residents reviewed for contact isolation precautions. The facility census was 80.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #62 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cellulitis of right leg, type II diabetes, nondisplaced fracture of the head of the radius, and methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. Review of the hospital discharge records dated 03/16/26 revealed Resident #62 had several blood cultures and wound cultures positive for MRSA. A physician order dated 03/17/26 for Resident #62 to have enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) in place. A plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, facility self-reported incident (SRI) review, police report review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #77 was free from sexual abuse. This affected one resident (Resident #77) of three residents reviewed for abuse.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 01/09/26 with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia with psychotic disturbance, cognitive communication deficit and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the care plan dated 01/09/26 revealed Resident #77 has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought process related to dementia. Interventions included administer medications as ordered, communicate with resident/family, identify self at each interaction, cue, reorient, supervise, keep resident routine consistent, monitor and document and report any changes.Review of Resident #77s 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, facility self-reported incident (SRI) review, police report, and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a sexual abuse allegation for Resident #77. This affected one resident (Resident #77) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 92.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 01/09/26 with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia with psychotic disturbance, cognitive communication deficit and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the care plan dated 01/09/26 revealed Resident #77 has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought process related to dementia. Interventions included administer medications as ordered, communicate with resident/family, identify self at each interaction, cue, reorient, supervise, keep resident routine consistent, monitor and document and report any changes.Review of Resident #77s 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure am individualized comprehensive nutrition plan was in place for Resident #5 and Resident #95 to properly monitor weights, nutritional status, and treat weight loss properly. This affected two residents (Resident #5 and #95) out of three residents reviewed for weights. Facility census was 92.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #95 revealed an admission date of 12/19/25 and a discharge date of 02/16/26 to the hospital. Diagnoses included but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, intermittent explosive disorder, and dementia.Review of the physician order for 12/19/25 revealed an order for regular diet, regular texture, thin liquids and for Med pass supplement 6 ounces (oz) with meals to give one container serving and record amount consumed. The order was discontinued on 02/13/26.Review of the care plan dated 12/19/25, revised on 12/27/25 revealed Resident #95 was at increased risk for malnutrition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, family interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide timely care and services to Resident #34 when she experienced a change of condition in the facility. This affected one resident (#34) out of three residents reviewed for change of condition. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 12/09/24. Diagnoses included unspecified fracture of the left and right calcaneus (heel), multiple fractures of the ribs on the right side, anxiety disorder, and depression. The record indicated she was in a motor vehicle accident prior to her admission to the facility. Review of Resident #34's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, utilized a wheelchair, and was dependent for toilet use and bathing and needed partial to moderate assistance for personal hygiene. Review of Resident #32's Physical Therapy (PT) Treatment Encounter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner, foods were dated, labeled, and discarded when expired, and ensure the ware washing was completed appropriately to ensure sanitation. This affected all 87 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility indicated there were no residents who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Observation on 10/28/24 at 9:30 A.M. during the initial kitchen tour with Regional Culinary Director #932 revealed the following concerns. - The front of reach in refrigerator had visible caked on soiling on the front of the refrigerator and the handle. - An undated, open package of shredded cheddar cheese was found in the reach in refrigerator. - An unlabeled, undated roast beef sandwich was found in the reach in refrigerator - The reach in refrigerator was soiled with multiple spills and had various food particles spread across the bottom of it. - The steam table was visibly soiled in the front with dried spilled food items. - The three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate use of personal protective equipment. This had the potential to affect 47 residents who resided on the second floor including Residents #1, #4, #6, #9, #11, #12, #13, #16, #19, #20, #22, #24, #27, #28, #29, #30, #34, #36, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #44, #51, #52, #55, #56, #57, #58, #61, #65, #70, #71, #74, #75, #76, #77, #78, #79, #80, #81, #84, #137, #187, #189 and #190. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including COVID-19, chronic diastolic congestive heart failure and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #18's physician orders revealed an order dated 10/28/24 for droplet isolation for COVID-19 for ten days (to be discontinued 11/07/24). Observation on 10/28/24 at 10:25 A.M. revealed Housekeeping #842 coming out of Resident #18's room. Housekeeping #842 had on a blue surgical gown, gloves and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility repair invoice and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure repairs were completed timely following identified concerns. This affected three residents ( #48, #59 and #69) of seven ( #7, #16, #48, #59, #69, #84 and #137) reviewed for environmental concerns requiring repairs. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Observations on 10/28/24 at 9:46 A.M. with [NAME] President (VP) of Plant Operations #933 and Maintenance Director (MD) #864 revealed Resident #59's room had six ceiling tiles in the first row running perpendicular to the entrance door with dried water stains, three tiles above the dresser were water stained, a hole was cut in the back wall of the bathroom drywall which revealed an exposed pipe. Rust stains were observed on the floor behind and around the toilet. The linoleum flooring was noted to be curled up from the back wall where rust-colored stains were observed. The ceiling tile above the toilet was broken into two pieces Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure monitoring prior to and following dialysis treatments for Resident #13. This affected one resident (#13) of one reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 06/10/23. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes mellitus, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and heart failure. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #13 revealed an order dated 06/19/24 for dialysis treatment at an off site dialysis center which began at 6:30 A.M. on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Resident #13 also had a physician order dated 12/05/23 for Resident #13's dialysis site be checked for signs and symptoms of infection every shift. Review of the pre and post dialysis assessments for Resident #13 in the electronic medical record revealed a no pre dialysis evaluations were completed from January 2024 through October…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure perineal care was performed appropriately after an episode of urinary and bowel incontinence. This affected one (Resident #81) of one resident observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 05/22/20 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, depression and anxiety. Review of the care plan dated 05/23/20 revealed Resident #81 had incontinence of bowel and bladder. Interventions included to check for incontinence and clean and dry skin if wet or soiled. Observation on 08/28/24 at 10:53 A.M. of incontinence care to Resident #81 by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 and LPN #201 revealed Resident #81's brief was wet with urine and bowel. LPN #200 and LPN #201 unfastened Resident #81's brief and then rolled her on her right side. LPN #200 cleaned her rectum area and buttocks of bowel, rinsed and then dried her off. LPN #200 and LPN #201 then rolled Resident #81 on her back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, electronic communication document review, staff interview, and non-facility staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all discharge records were completed timely so residents who were discharged could fully use their insurance benefits. This affected one resident (#81) of three resident records reviewed. The facility census was 79. Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease, low back pain, chronic viral hepatitis, paranoid schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, other recurrent depressive disorder, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, neurogenic bowel, muscle weakness, adult failure to thrive, chronic pain syndrome, and other psychoactive substance abuse. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/11/23, revealed Resident #81 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #81's medical records found that he was discharged from the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to inform residents of new orders and treatment plans. This affected one (Resident #36) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 76. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 01/23/24 with diagnoses including pleural effusion, cirrhosis of the liver, hepatitis C, hypertension, esophageal varices, diabetes, obstructive pulmonary disease, traumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia, and ascites (a condition in which fluid collects in spaces within your abdomen). Review of the progress note for Resident #36 dated 01/25/24 timed at 11:40 P.M. revealed the resident requested to go to the hospital to have immediate paracentesis (a procedure performed in patients with ascites, during which a needle is inserted into the abdomen to drain excess fluid), because she had increased abdominal pain, and she felt her liver was leaky. The nurse assessed the resident and noted the resident's abdomen was slightly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record , review of the Self-Reported Incident (SRI), interview with staff and review of the facility policy the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of resident narcotics. This affected one resident (R#9) of three residents reviewed for narcotic medication use. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included alcohol abuse with withdrawal complications, diabetes, acute kidney failure, rhabdomyolysis, gout, anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, insomnia, and abnormality of plasma proteins. Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #9 had orders for Percocet 5/325 milligrams (mg) every four hours as needed for pain dated 07/04/23. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had intact cognition and experienced pain frequently. The numeric pain rating was an eight on a zero to 10 pain scale with 10 being the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview with staff the facility failed to provide timely diagnostic testing and treatment of a resident with an urinary tract infection. This affected one resident (#56) of three reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 75. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included mental disorder, anxiety disorder, developmental disorders, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the nursing note dated 07/28/23 at 11:56 A.M. revealed Resident #56 was complaining of burning during urination. A urinalysis (UA) and Culture Sensitivity (C&S) was ordered by the physician. There were no other notes regarding the UA/C&S until 08/04/23 at 8:26 A.M. revealing a UA and C&S was to be recollected. Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #56 had an order for a urinalysis and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of a significant medication error. This affected one resident (#20) of three reviewed for medication administration. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included psychosis, dementia, schizoaffective disorder, convulsions, insomnia, bipolar disorder, depressive disorders, anxiety disorder, mood affective disorder, vitamin D deficiency, diabetes, adult failure to thrive, restlessness, auditory hallucinations, hypertension, and symbolic dysfunction. Review of the June 2023 physician orders revealed Resident #20 did not have an order for insulin. Review of the medication error incident form dated 06/23/23 at 2:00 P.M. revealed Resident #20 received 24 units of Humalog insulin and 10 units of Novolog insulin at 9:30 A.M., which was given in error. The Director of Nursing and physician were notified and a new order was received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview and record review, the facility staff failed to treat all Residents with dignity and respect at all times. This affected two Residents (#53 and #71) of 30 residents interviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 71. Findings included: 1. Record review was conducted on Resident #53 who was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, type two diabetes, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, recurrent depressive disorder and respiratory failure with hypoxia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired with rejection of care, required extensive assistance of one for ADLs, had a urinary catheter and was frequently incontinent of bowels and received antidepressants. Review of the care plan of 07/07/22 revealed care areas included activity of daily living (ADL) self-care deficits, diarrhea, behaviors including hoarding and walking around naked with goals and interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were disbursed within 30 days of discharge for Resident #124. This affected one of one residents reviewed for closed resident fund accounts. The facility census was 71. Findings included: Resident #124 was admitted [DATE], with diagnoses including heart failure, pulmonary edema,and dementia. Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #124 was discharged on 03/22/22. The facility provided documentation Resident #124's account was closed on 04/26/22 which included a check dated 04/26/22 and the Pay to the order of line blank. Interview on 07/21/22 at 2:45 P.M. with the Administrator verified the Pay to the order of line should have been filled in with Resident #124's name or the name of their representative and the funds should have been dispersed within 30 days of the resident's discharge
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Residents #17 and #54 received showers/baths as scheduled. This affected two (#17 and #54) of three residents reviewed for bathing. The census was 71. Findings included: 1. Resident #17 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, quadriplegia, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, acquired absence of left hip joint and both legs above the knee, colonostomy, suprapubic catheter and chronic osteomyelitis. Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact, verbal behaviors towards others including rejection of care, and required extensive assist of two for activities of daily living (ADL) with no bathing activity during the seven day look back period. Review of the care plan dated 05/06/22 revealed care areas included refusal/noncompliance of care with interventions including anticipating and meeting the resident's needs, discussing risks benefits…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Residents # 11, #66, and #123 were appropriately supervised while smoking cigarettes and in accordance with the smoking policy. This affected three residents of 18 residents the facility identified as smokers. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Resident #66 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including alcohol abuse, history of stroke, tobacco use and cannabis use. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and needed limited assistance of one staff for activities of daily living (ADL)s. Care plan of 07/07/22 included a care area for smoking with interventions including smoking safely in designated areas, at designated smoking times with staff supervision in accordance with the facility smoking policy. Smoking Assessment of 06/28/22 revealed Resident #66 was safe to smoke with supervision. Observation and interview on 07/18/22 at 1:27 P.M. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-07-21 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical director was an active participant of the Quality Assurance (QA) Committee. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the facilities sign-in sheet for the QA meeting minutes for the meetings held on January 29, 2021 to February 28, 2022 revealed no evidence the Medical Director attended the meetings. Interview with the Administrator on 07/21/22 at 4:28 P.M. verified the Medical Director had not attended the QA meetings as required.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EPHRAM LAHASKY — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIGBEE OPCO MEMBER LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/03/2022 |
| WEBSTER, AARON | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 12/31/2021 |
| KATZ, LARRY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/31/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $553K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365324. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.