Bayshore Residence And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 98.2 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.52 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-06-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from mental and emotional abuse for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) when nursing assistant (NA)-A took humiliating photographs of residents and video recordings of residents which NA-A then posted on Snapchat (social media). In addition, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse when NA-A physically abused R1 when assisting R1 into bed. NA-A also video taped this abuse and posted on Snapchat. These actions had the potential to cause serious psychosocial and physical harm to residents. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ). The IJ began on 6/17/24, when the Minnesota Department of Health received an allegation that NA-A shared numerous pictures and videos on social media of R1, R2, R3 and R4. The pictures contained exposed resident private areas, residents in underwear, lewd gestures from NA-A to residents, and videos of NA-A abusing a resident. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's advance directives were accurately and consistently documented in the resident's electronic health record (EHR) banner, Provider Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) and physician orders to ensure the residents wishes would be followed in the event of a cardiac arrest. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy for 1 of 34 residents (R86) who's code status was not accurately documented and was reviewed for advanced directives. The immediate jeopardy (IJ) began on [DATE], at R86's first care conference. The care conference identified R86 and family member (FM)-A as being in attendance. Section C Nursing included the following: Resident continues to be a full code. Section E Social Services identified R86's code status as Full Code. R86's POLST located in the EHR scanned documents dated [DATE], identified R86 as Do Not Resuscitate. In addition, when the facility became aware of the discrepancy they changed the banner in the EHR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who was at risk for elopement. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1 when he eloped from the facility, was not identified as missing for 1.25 hours and found 2 miles away from the facility. The IJ began on 4/15/24 at 6:37 a.m. when nursing assistant (NA)-A saw R1 outside of the facility on the sidewalk in front of the building, mistook him for a visitor, and cleared the wanderguard door alarm without searching for a missing resident. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were informed of the IJ on 4/18/24 at 4:30 p.m. The facility had implemented corrective action on 4/16/24, prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet undated indicated R1 had diagnoses of bipolar disorder and metabolic encephalopathy. R1's Elopement Risk Evaluation dated 4/10/24, indicated R1 had a history of exit seeking and attempting to leave the building which put him at risk for elopement. R1's Brief Interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to properly dispose of medications in the second-floor medication storage room. This had the ability to affect any resident who received medications from the second-floor medication storage room. Findings include: During a tour of the second-floor medication room with licensed practical nurse (LPN)-D on 6/25/26 at 9:23 a.m., multiple medications were observed to be expired. LPN-D stated that he wasn't sure of the process to remove the expired medications and I would have to follow up with director of nursing (DON). LPN-D stated that a lot of the medications in the medication storage room were overflow. Expired medications included the following: -saline nasal gel, expired 4/28/25-magnesium chloride, expired 4/9/26-docusate sodium, expired 12/4/25-cephalaxin, filled 9/16/25-Tylenol assigned to R19, expired 6/18/25. During an interview on 6/25/26 at 12:34 p.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated the nurse managers, or her audit medication carts monthly, but she had not audited the second-floor medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure meals were palatable for 8 of 14 residents (R17, R12, R10, R4, R5, R58, R61, R81) who expressed dissatisfaction with palatability of meals. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the temperature of foods was maintained when transported to resident rooms. Findings include: R17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R17 was moderately cognitively intact. During an interview on 6/22/26 at 2:30 p.m., R17 stated the food was pretty much terrible. During an observation on 6/24/26 at 1:02 p.m., R17 was no longer in the main dining room. He had eaten only a few bites of the meal which was a French dip sandwich, French fries, and a creamy cucumber salad. R12's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified R12 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 6/22/26 at 3:15 p.m., R12 stated the food was poor quality, said the cooks didn't know how to cook, and went on to state the hot food was not hot, and ice cream was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to consistently track and monitor dishwasher temperatures for both the wash and rinse cycles, and take timely action to correct the temperatures, for 1 of 1 dishwasher. This had the potential to affect all current residents, as well as staff or visitors, who ate food served from dishes and tableware that were cleaned in the dishwasher. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitary storage of cleaning products and personal protective equipment and failed to ensure staff appropriately covered facial hair.Findings include: Dishwasher temperatures:During an observation on 6/25/26 at 9:38 a.m., dietary aide (DA)-A was operating the dirty side of the dishwasher and DA-B was removing dishes on the clean side of the dishwasher. DA-A completed a wash cycle. On the dishwasher, the rinse temperature was observed to be 180 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and the wash temperature gauge was not functioning.During an interview on 6/25/26 at 10:11 a.m., DA-A stated dishwasher temperatures were logged by staff working…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of and consented to medications prescribed and given for mental health intervention for 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R2 was cognitively intact.R2's diagnoses included heart failure, renal insufficiency, schizoaffective disorder, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and arthritis.R2's care plan dated 6/26/26, identified R2 uses psychotropic medications related to behavior management. R2's provider orders dated 8/18/25, included mirtazapine oral tablet 15 mg: Give 15 mg by mouth at bedtime for depression. R2's provider orders dated 8/19/25, included risperidone oral tablet 0.5 mg: Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for mood disorder.R2's Informed Consent for Required Medications dated 2/5/24, for risperidone 2.5 mg two times a day for bipolar, was signed by R2.R2's medical record had no Informed Consent for Required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was assessed to be unable to self-administer medications did not self-administer nebulizer treatments. This affected 1 of 1 resident (R8) reviewed for self-administration of medication.Findings include: R8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R8 as cognitively intact. Diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). R8's MDS further indicated that she was assessed as unable to self-administer medications. R8's current orders, reviewed 6/24/26, included Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Nebulization Solution 2.5 milligrams (mg), inhale orally three times a day. Current orders failed to indicate R8 was able to self-administer medications. During observation on 6/24/26 at 11:00 a.m., R8's nebulizer sat atop her bedside table with noted droplets in the nebulizer chamber. During interview on 6/24/26 at 11:47 a.m., R8 stated that she uses her nebulizer three times…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facilty failed to honor shaving preferences and needed assistance for 1 of 1 residents (R112) who required minimal assistance with shaving and oral care. Findings include:R112's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], status: ready for export, indicated R112 was cognitively intact with the diagnoses of encounter for orthopedic after care, kidney disease, diabetes, congestive heart failure and muscle weakness. Section GG indicated R112 required setup or clean-up assistance for personal hygiene including shaving and oral hygiene. R112's care plan last updated dated 6/23/26, did not include R112's general preferences or activities of living (ADL) preferences. The Focus area Functional Discharge Goals included: hygiene goal: set up or clean up assistance with personal hygiene. The oral hygiene goal identified was to be independent with oral hygiene. On 6/22/26 at 2:04 p.m., R112 stated staff had not offered to help them get set up to brush their teeth,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident could smoke safely for 1 of 1 resident (R10) reviewed for safe smoking.Findings include:R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R10 was cognitively intact and had no rejections of care. In addition, R10's MDS identified he required set up for eating and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living.R10's Diagnosis Report dated 6/26/26, identified R10 had diagnoses which included heart failure (a condition where the heart muscle is too weak or too stiff to pump blood efficiently), lymphedema (a chronic condition characterized by the abnormal buildup of protein-rich lymph fluid, which causes swelling [edema] in the body's soft tissues), cellulitis of left finger, acquired absence of left finger(s), burn of unspecified degree of multiple sites of left and right wrist and hand, diabetes mellitus, open wound of left middle finger, open wound of left ring finger.R10's Medication Review Report…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) protocols were followed for 1 of 1 resident (R103) reviewed for infection control.Findings include:R103's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R103 was cognitively intact.R103's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, neurogenic bladder, hypertension, anemia, arthritis, anxiety, and depression.R103's care plan dated 6/17/26, identified the resident was on EBP related to a suprapubic (SP) catheter and chronic wounds, and directed care staff to follow EBP and to utilize gowns and gloves for all personal care. R103's provider orders dated 12/11/25, included SP catheter cleansing and maintenance for neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder.During an observation on 6/24/26 at 12:58 p.m., R103's door had a sign indicating R103 was on EBP. The sign instructed staff to wear a gown and gloves for high-contact resident care activities, including dressing and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure residents did not have to share a living space with a resident (R72) who would not shower or change clothing. This deficient practice affected 3 of 3 residents (R52, R65, R44) reviewed for environment.Findings include:R72's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified he had diagnoses which included anemia, heart disease, hypertension, arthritis, depression, panlobular emphysema (an irreversible type of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [progressive, incurable lung disease that blocks airflow and makes breathing difficult]), hypomagnesemia (a low level of magnesium in the blood), cannabis use, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (when stomach acid flows back up into the esophagus and causes heartburn). In addition, R72's MDS identified he was cognitively intact, had no rejections of care and was independent with activities of daily living (ADLS) including personal hygiene.R72's Medication Review Report dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure residents right to leave the facility was honored for 2 for 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed who had physicians orders restricting their rights to a leave of absence.R1's admission Record indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include type 2 diabetes mellites (DMII), infection of left hip, pain, weakness and gait abnormalities.R1's care plan dated 2/10/24, indicated she was at low risk for elopement. The care plan identified substance abuse/dependence as evidenced by resident having alcohol and drug paraphernalia/admitting to substance use and indicated leave of absence (LOA) privileges revoked per physician.R1's Physician Order Report dated 10/20/25, identified the following order dated 7/10/25: Revoked privileges of LOA. Resident not allowed to leave facility per provider.R2's admission Record indicated he admitted to the facility 2/13/25. Diagnoses included: depression, head laceration, anemia, tobacco use and alcohol…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$132,398 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $122,175 — penalty dated 2024-05-28
• $10,223 — penalty dated 2024-04-20
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-26 for 10 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EPHRAM LAHASKY — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN