No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Jaffrey Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

20 Plantation Drive, Jaffrey, NH 03452 · For profit - Individual · 83 certified beds · (603) 532-8762 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (603) 532-8762 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited May 2026
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (21) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
82 Peterborough St · (603) 532-8775 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.9 mi
14 Peterborough St · (603) 532-6955 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
43 Hunt Rd · (603) 532-7462 · Call to confirm hours
Park
20 Union St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
133 Turnpike Rd · (603) 532-6931

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.9%22.7%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.8%2.1%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms76.2%13.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.7%4.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.7%17.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication38.4%19.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.7%4.2%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.0%25.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.1%17.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.4%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.8%83.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.5%22.2%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.1%13.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.801.641.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.591.871.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.2%CMS range 39.7–58.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.5%CMS range 8.6–18.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge36.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge41.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay7.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.2–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.281.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.81
RN hours/ resident / day
0.54
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.41
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.68
RN hoursweekends
39.7%
Total nursing turnover
36.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 83 beds and averages 76.1 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-21)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to implement control measures from their water management plan to prevent the growth and spread of Legionella and other water borne pathogens in a facility with a census of 72 residents. Findings Include: Review on 5/20/26 of facility's Legionella Water Management Plan revealed: Control Measures and Corrective Actions 4. Flush hot water tank sediment at least annually. 7. Remove and clean shower heads (including handheld wands) used for resident bathing. Clear strainers and pressure restrictors of sediment and potential biofilm, at least annually. Interview on 5/20/2026 at 9:28 a.m. with Staff B (Director of Maintenance) confirmed that there was no documentation the above control measures were performed. Review on 5/20/26 of facility policy titled Legionella Water Management Program, revised in September 2022, revealed: 5. The water management program includes the following elements: f. The control limits or parameters that are acceptable and that are monitored .

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation that the resident or resident representative was informed in advance of treatment risks and benefits, options and alternatives prior to initiating psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a final sample of 18. (Resident identifier is #31.)Findings include: Review on 5/21/26 of Resident #31's current physician's orders revealed the following order Clonazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (Milligrams) give 0.5 tablet by mouth one time a day for anxiety related to Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity with anxiety and give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime; dated 11/14/25Review on 5/21/26 of Resident #31's medical record revealed there was no consent signed by the resident or resident representative at the initiation of the medication on 11/14/25.Interview on 5/21/26 at approximately 12:02 p.m. with Staff A (Director of Nursing) confirmed the above findings.Review on 5/22/26 of the facility's policy Psychotropic Medication use, Revision date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident receiving psychotropic medications received a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for 1 or 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a final sample of 18 residents (Resident identifier is #6 ).Findings include: Resident #6 Review on 5/21/26 of Resident #6's medication orders revealed an order for Seroquel 50 milligrams (mg) with an order date of 8/17/23 and Remeron 30mg with an order date of 3/2/2023. Review on 5/21/26 of Resident #6's psychiatric notes dated 2/4/26, 2/18/26, 4/15/26, 5/13/26, and 5/18/26 revealed no clinical contraindication for a GDR. Review on 5/21/26 of Resident #6's progress notes for the last year revealed no documentation of a gradual dose reduction. Interview on 5/21/26 at approximately 12:30 p.m. with Staff A (Director of Nursing) confirmed Resident #6 had not had a GDR in the last year and that there was no documentation of a clinical contraindication for a GDR.in Resident #6's medical record. Review on 5/21/26 of facility policy titled Tapering Medication and Gradual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's order for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for choices in a final sample of 18 residents (Resident identifier is #1).Findings include:[NAME], [NAME] A., and [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing. 10th edition St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier, 2021. Page 614 .It is essential to verify the accuracy of every medication you give to your patients with the patient's order. If the medication order is incomplete, incorrect, or inappropriate, or if there is a discrepancy between the original order and the information on the MAR [Medication Administration Record]. consult with the health care provider. Do not give a medication until you are certain that you can follow the seven rights of medication administration . Page 672 .seven rights of medication administration include right medication, right dose, right patient, right route, right time, right documentation and right indication . Review on 5/19/26 of Resident #1's May 2026 Medication Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were maintained in a locked cart in 1 of 2 medication carts observed (Chapel Unit medication cart).Findings include:Chapel Unit medication cartObservation on 5/19/26 at approximately 8:15 a.m. of Chapel Unit medication cart revealed the cart was left unlocked for approximately 3 minutes with no responsible staff nearby.Interview on 5/19/26 at approximately 8:15 a.m. of Staff H (Medication Nursing Assistant) confirmed the above finding.Review on 5/20/26 of facility policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage revised date February 2023 revealed . Policy Interpretation and Implementation.4. Compartments (including but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing medications and biologicals are locked when not in use.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's dietary preferences were taken into consideration 1 of 2 residents reviewed for choices in a final sample of 18 residents. (Resident identifier is #12.)Findings include: Interview on 5/19/26 at approximately 9:08 a.m. with Resident #12 revealed that he/she does not get what they want for breakfast. Resident #12 further revealed that, The Speech pathologist made all kinds of changes to my diet and that I can't have bacon. Resident #12 revealed that he/she would like bacon with his/her breakfast each day.Observation on 5/20/26 at approximately 8:41 a.m. of Resident #12 in the main dining room revealed the Resident #12's breakfast consisted of fried eggs, oatmeal with syrup, and pancakes.Interview on 5/20/26 at approximately 8:45 a.m. with Resident #12 revealed that he/she did not have bacon with breakfast and that I am not allowed to have bacon.Review on 5/20/26 of Resident #12's medical record Health status note 5/10/26 revealed, .ST (Speech Therapist) screened resident during lunch .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty for at least eight (8) consective hours a day, 7 days a week, for 2 days in Fiscal Year Quarter 1 2025. Findings include: Review on 4/14/25 of the Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data [NAME] Report for Fiscal Year Quarter 1 2025 revealed that the facility triggered for failing to have Registered Nurse (RN) hours for 8 consecutive hours a day for 78 days during October 2025, November 2025, and December 2025. Review on 4/16/25 of the facility's Payroll Detail and Daily Attendance Report revealed that there was no RN coverage on 10/7/24 and 11/24/24. Interview on 4/16/25 at 2:37 p.m. with Staff K (Human Resources) confirmed there was no RN coverage on 10/7/24 and 11/24/24.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5 percent (%) for 2 of 28 medication administrations observed. (Resident Identifiers are #38 and #224). Findings include: Resident #38 Observation on 4/14/25 at 9:02 a.m. of the morning medication administration for Resident #38 with Staff L (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)) revealed Staff L prepared one tablet of Calcium Carbonate 600 milligrams (mg) and one tablet of Vitamin D 1000 units and attempted to administer the medications to Resident #38. Review on 4/14/25 of Resident #38's April 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a physician's order for Calcium Carbonate (600 mg) with Vitamin D and minerals (400 units) and to give 1 tablet by mouth daily. Interview on 4/14/25 at 9:02 am. with Staff L revealed that the facility did not have the Calcium Carbonate (600 mg) with Vitamin D (400 units) and minerals at the facility. Interview on 4/14/25 at 1:55 p.m. with Staff L confirmed the above and that he/she had administered the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-16 · tag F0851 — pattern
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to submit complete and accurate data for Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) for Fiscal Year Quarter 1 2025 (October 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025). Findings include: Review on 4/14/25 of the Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data [NAME] Report for Fiscal Year Quarter 1 2025 revealed that the facility failed to have Registered Nurse (RN) hours and failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 hours a day on the following dates: 10/1/24 to 10/31/24; 11/1/24 to 11/30/24; and 12/15/25 to 12/31/25. Review on 4/16/25 of the facility's Payroll Detail and Daily Attendance Report revealed that there was 24 hour of Licensed Nurse coverage on the above days. Further review revealed that there was RN coverage on all but 2 days days (10/7/24 and 11/24/24). Interview on 4/16/25 at 2:37 p.m. with Staff K (Human Resources) confirmed there was Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 hours a day and there was no RN coverage on 10/7/24 and 11/24/24. Review on 4/16/25 of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Electronic Staffing Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care in a final sample of 18 residents (Resident identifier is #223). Findings include: Resident #223 [NAME], [NAME] A., and [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing. 10th edition St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier, 2021. Page 614 .It is essential to verify the accuracy of every medication you give to your patients with the patient's order. If the medication order is incomplete, incorrect, or inappropriate, or if there is a discrepancy between the original order and the information on the MAR [Medication Administration Record]. consult with the health care provider. Do not give a medication until you are certain that you can follow the seven rights of medication administration . Page 672 .seven rights of medication administration include right medication, right dose, right patient, right route, right time, right documentation and right indication .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 11 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that controlled medications were maintained in separately locked, permanently affixed compartment for 1 of 1 medications rooms observed. Findings include: Observation on 4/14/25 at 11:52 a.m. of the Chapel Medication Room revealed an unlocked refrigerator that contained a removable, unlocked combination lock box. Inside this box was vial of liquid Ativan (Schedule IV controlled substance). Further observation revealed that the numbers to unlock the box were written on the outside of the lock box. Interview on 4/14/25 at 11:52 a.m. with Staff H (Licensed Practical Nurse) confirmed that the lock box should have been secured/locked and the code should not have been on the outside of the box. Interview on 4/14/25 at 2:30 p.m. with Staff E (Director of Nursing) revealed that the Ativan should have been double locked. Review on 4/15/25 of the facility's policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage, revised February 2023, revealed, .7. Controlled substances (listed as Schedule II-V of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident medical records were accurate for 3 residents reviewed in a final sample of 18 residents (Resident Identifiers are #40, #123 and #274.) Findings Include: Resident #40 Review on 4/16/25 of Assessing Falls and Their Causes, Nursing Services Policy and Procedure Manual for Long Term Care, copyright 2001, provided by the facility revealed . Documentation When a resident falls the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 1. The condition in which the resident was found (e.g., resident found lying on floor between bed and chair). 2. Assessment data, including vital signs and any obvious injuries. 3. Interventions, first aid, or treatments administered. 4. Notification of the physician, family, as indicated. 6. Appropriate interventions taken to prevent future falls . Review on 4/15/25 of Resident #40's medical record revealed a nursing note dated 3/28/25 at 10:41 a.m. [name omitted] notified of resident's fall. The name identified in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #23 Review on 4/14/25 at approximately 2:00 p.m. of Resident #23 hospice binder revealed a hospice admission date of 7/7/24 and no schedule of visits or services to be provided. Interview on 4/15/25 at approximately 8:20 a.m. with Staff H (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)) revealed nursing is unaware of when or how often hospice visits are. Review on 4/15/25 at approximately 9:00 a.m. of Resident #23's hospice care plan revealed LNA [Licensed Nursing Assistant] visits per schedule. Interview on 4/16/25 at approximately 10:45 a.m. with Staff I (Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA)) revealed there was no prediction of when visits will take place or how often. Interview on 4/16/25 at approximately 11:15 a.m. with Staff G (Social Services) revealed he/she had thought hospice was providing the units with a visits schedule. Interview further revealed, he/she was emailed the schedules but did not provide them to the units. Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to coordinate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0882 — isolated
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to employ, at least on a part-time basis, an Infection Preventionist who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. Findings include: Interview on 4/15/25 at 10:06 a.m. with Staff B (Infection Preventionist (IP)) revealed that he/she was the IP for the facility for over a year. Review on 4/15/25 of Staff B's Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course revealed that under the Completion had 1 course that was required (Completion for Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course) and was Not Started. Interview on 4/15/25 at 2:24 p.m. with Staff B confirmed that they had not completed the above course, and still had to complete and pass the final test.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety to prevent foodborne illness and failed to monitor the high dishwasher temperatures to ensure proper sanitization. Food Storage: Findings include: Review on 4/23/24 of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Food Code, dated 2017, retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/food/FDA-food-code/food-code-2017 revealed the following: .Annex 3, Public Health Reasons/Administrative Guidelines . Chapter 3 Food .3-305.11 Food Storage .FOOD shall be protected from contamination by storing the FOOD: . On-premises preparation .(D) A date marking system that meets the criteria stated in (A) and (B) of this section may include: (1) Using a method approved by the regulatory authority for refrigerated, ready-to-eat time/temperature control for safety food that is frequently rewrapped, such as lunchmeat or a roast, or for which date marking is impractical, such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review it was determined that the facility failed to use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when handling, processing, and transporting linens to prevent the spread of infection. Findings include: Observation on 4/25/24 at 11:00 am of Staff D (Laundry Aide) exiting the South shower room revealed that Staff D exited the shower room with a cart of overflowing soiled linens. The overflowing cart of soiled linens was in contact with Staff D's clothing. Staff D proceeded down the hallway with the overflowing cart of soiled linens with residents and other staff in the hallway. Interview on 4/25/24 at 11:05 a.m. with Staff C (Infection Preventionist) confirmed that Staff D was transporting a overflowing cart of soiled linens, that was in contact with his/her clothing, down a hallway with residents and staff. Observation on 4/25/24 at 11:30 a.m. of Staff D in the dirty laundry room revealed that Staff D was loading the washing machine with soiled linens wearing gloves but no gown. Interview on 4/25/24 at 11:32 a.m. with Staff C confirmed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the call bell system was equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance for a census of 73 residents. Finding include: Resident #59 Review on 4/24/24 of Resident #59's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/6/24 revealed under Section C: Cognitive Patterns, Resident #59 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, meaning, Resident #59 was cognitively intact. Review on 4/25/24 of Resident #59's care plan revised on 8/21/23 for toilet use and transfer revealed that Resident #59 required extensive staff for participation to use the toilets and with transfers. Interview on 4/24/24 at 8:25 a.m. with Resident #59 revealed he/she wishes that staff would come faster when he/she pressed the call button. Resident #59 stated that he/she has waited 45 minutes or longer. Interview further revealed that waiting 45 minutes or longer could happen at any time during the day but when he/she has to wait in the early mornings to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to offer therapeutic dietary recommendations to maintain body weight and failed to monitor parameters of nutritional status per facility protocol for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition in a final survey sample of 22 residents (Resident Identifiers #36 and #61). Findings include: Resident #36 Review on 4/24/24 of Resident #36's medical record revealed that Resident #36 was admitted to the facility in February 2024. Review on 4/25/24 of Resident #36's Weights and Vitals Summary revealed the following recorded weights: 3/27/24 - 126.4 pounds (Wheelchair); 4/10/24 - 126.8 pounds (Wheelchair); 4/17/24 - 117.6 pounds (Wheelchair); 4/25/24 - 116.6 pounds (Wheelchair). Review on 4/25/24 of Resident #36's Dietary Note, signed by Staff N (Dietician), dated 3/21/24, revealed a recommendation to trial 4-ounce nutrition shakes daily and to add ice cream to provide supplemental calories. Review on 4/26/24 of Resident #36's Physician and Dietary orders revealed no orders for the above Dietician recommendations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering practitioner of critical laboratory results for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for insulin in a final survey sample of 22 residents (Resident Identifier #13). Findings include: Review on 4/24/24 of Resident #13's Final Lab Result collected on 4/23/24 at 8:06 a.m. revealed the Glucose was 26 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) and critically low. Review on 4/25/24 of Resident #13's medical record, including progress notes for nurses and physicians, revealed that there was no documentation the provider had been notified of the critically low blood glucose level. Interview on 4/25/24 at approximately 2:30 p.m. with Staff A (Director of Nursing) confirmed that there was no documentation that the provider had been notified. Interview on 4/25/24 at approximately 2:50 p.m. with Staff J (Unit Manager) revealed the above critical lab result was called to the facility on 4/23/24 at 5:03 p.m. Review on 4/26/24 of the facility's policy titled Lab and Diagnostic Test Results- Clinical Protocol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-05-21 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the facility assessment included specific staffing needs for each resident unit for a census of 72 residents. Findings include:Review on 5/20/26 of the Facility Assessment revealed the following . Staffing plan 3.2 . The staffing plan is to ensure sufficient staff is available to meet the needs of the residents at any given time and will fluctuate based on acuity and staff competency Direct care staff: Day shift: 3 Licensed Nurses (RN(Registered nurse)/LPN(Licensed practical nurse)) and 7 Licensed Nurses Aides; Eve Shift: 3 Licensed Nurses (RN/LPN) and 7 Licensed Nurses Aides; Night shift: 2 Licensed nurses (RN/LPN) and 4 Licensed Nurses Aides. Further review of the facility assessment did not identify staffing needs per resident unit.Interview on 5/21/26 at approximately 10:23 a.m. with Staff F (Director of Human Resources) confirmed that the facility assessment did not break down staffing for each resident unit.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-04-16 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the residents' status for 2 of 3 resident reviewed for hospice in a final sample of 18 residents (Resident Identifiers are #12 and #38). Findings include: Resident #12 Review on 4/15/25 of Resident #12's medical record revealed that Resident #12 was admitted to hospice on 2/6/25. Review on 4/15/25 of Resident #12's MDS for significant change dated 2/13/25 revealed that Section O- Special Treatments, procedures and Programs, K1 Hospice was marked no. Resident #38 Review on 4/15/25 of Resident #38's medical record revealed that Resident #38 was admitted to hospice on 12/16/24 prior to his/her admission to the facility on 2/6/25. Review on 4/15/25 of Resident #38's admission MDS revealed that Section O- Special Treatments, procedures and Programs, K1 Hospice was marked no. Interview on 4/16/25 at approximately 11:17 a.m. with Staff A RN- MDS Coordinator) confirmed that the MDS for Residents #12 and #38 did not correctly indicate that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EPHRAM LAHASKY — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DRAGON, JESSICAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2025
MAJEKODUNMI, AKINDELEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 11%Other / private 23%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$367per resident / day
operating cost
$11,164per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$362per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Hampshire Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Hampshire
$12,243/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,444/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,025/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 305072. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next