No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Majestic Gardens At Memphis Rehab & Snc

131 N Tucker, Memphis, TN 38104 · For profit - Corporation · 169 certified beds · (901) 726-5600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Aug 2023Resident-funds citation (F0569)4 immediate-jeopardy citations$810,404 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Aug 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $810,404 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-08)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1801 Union Ave · (901) 516-9000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens<0.1 mi
1863 Union Ave · (901) 272-2006 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.2 mi
1759 Union Ave · (901) 272-8630 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1914 Poplar Ave · (901) 274-6046 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.8%14.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.2%6.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.1%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.2%13.8%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%3.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.4%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.5%31.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.6%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.7%5.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.9%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.6%16.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.7%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine33.3%79.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission35.5%22.6%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.8%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.671.671.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.911.561.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
32.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.08U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 32.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.7%CMS range 25.3–56.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.1%CMS range 9.2–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge32.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge31.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge26.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.6%CMS range 5.7–14.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.281.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.91
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.04
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.36
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
68.5%
Total nursing turnover
52.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 169 beds and averages 151.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-11)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, Director of Maintenance job description, facility investigation, manufacturer's manual recommendations, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards when dangerously elevated hot water temperatures were measured and when the facility failed to provide a safe environment and adequate supervision to prevent falls and injury for 2 of 5 (Resident #14 and #86) sampled residents reviewed for accidents. On 4/29/2024 and 5/7/2024, dangerous elevated hot water temperatures ranging from 121 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 142 degrees Fahrenheit (F) were found in 32 of 169 (Resident Rooms #100, #101, #102, #103, #104, #105, #106, #107, #108, #109, #110, #115, #116, #203, #205, #212, #213, #215, #216, #306, #309, #316, #317, #318, #320, #325, #332, #400, #401, #406, #413, and #414) resident rooms checked for water temperatures. Hot water temperatures ranging from 121 degrees to 133 degrees F were found in 3 of the 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, video footage, hospital record review, facility investigation review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment to prevent serious injury and elopement 4 of 14 (Residents #1, #2, #6, and # 15) sampled residents for wheelchair/elevator and wandering/elopement accidents and incidents. On [DATE] Resident #1 exited the 200 hall elevator in a motorized wheelchair, the elevator floor was not level with the floor of the hallway when the elevator door opened, the resident fell out of the wheelchair sustaining bilateral leg fractures, and later died. Resident #2 fell to the floor in a wheelchair when exiting the unlevel elevator floor on [DATE], resulting in fractured leg, and Resident #6 fell from a wheelchair when exiting the unlevel elevator floor on [DATE], resulting in no injuries. Resident #15, a cognitively impaired resident with Dementia and a history of wandering and exit seeking behaviors, eloped from the facility for an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-24 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility policy review, job description review, and interview, Administration failed to provide oversight that ensured a safe environment and adequate supervision to prevent serious injuries, failed to ensure a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process of data collection, analysis, interventions, monitoring and follow up, and failed to ensure the highest practicable wellbeing of residents with wheelchair dependency, dementia and wandering behaviors. The facility Administration failed to ensure the 200 hall elevator functioned in a safe manner, failed to conduct a thorough investigation related to accident/hazards involving the malfunction of the 200 hall elevator, failed to take immediate actions to protect all residents from the 200 hall elevator malfunction, and failed to ensure a safe environment to prevent injuries for 4 of 14 (Residents #1, #2, #6, and # 15) sampled residents for wheelchair/elevator and wandering/elopement accidents and incidents. Residents #1, #2, and #6 experienced falls from their wheelchairs when exiting the 200 hall elevator when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, job description review, review of Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) minutes, and interview, the QAPI committee failed to ensure systems and processes were in place and consistently followed by staff that address quality issues related to a safe environment and adequate supervision to prevent serious injuries. The QAPI Committee failed to identify quality safety deficiencies and failed to implement and monitor effective safety interventions for 4 of 14 (Residents #1, #2, #6, and # 15) sampled residents for wheelchair/elevator and wandering/elopement accidents and incidents. On 5/22/2023, Resident #6 fell from a wheelchair when exiting the unlevel floor from the 200 hall elevator. On 6/2/2023, Resident #2 fell to the floor in a wheelchair when exiting the 200 hall elevator and sustained a fractured rib and fractured leg. On 7/22/2023, Resident #1 exited the 200 hall elevator in a motorized wheelchair, the elevator floor was not level with the floor of the hallway when the elevator door opened and the resident sustained bilateral leg fractures,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints for 1 of 1 (Resident #14) sampled residents reviewed for physical restraints. The findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Use of Restraints, revealed .Restraints shall only be used for the safety and well-being of the resident(s) and only after other alternatives have been tried unsuccessfully. Restraints shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptom(s) and never for discipline or staff convenience, or for the prevention of falls. When the use of restraints is indicated, the least restrictive alternative will be used for the least amount of time necessary, and the ongoing re-evaluation for the need for restraints will be documented.Physical Restraints.are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of staff to resident abuse to the appropriate agencies in a timely manner for 2 of 3 (Resident #65 and #107) sampled residents for allegations of abuse. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Facility Responsibility for Reporting Allegations, dated September 2022, revealed .All allegations/occurrences of all types of staff-to-resident abuse must be reported to the administrator and to other officials, including the State Survey Agency and adult protective services. 2. Review of medical records revealed Resident #65 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Cerebral infarction, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Diabetes. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated Resident #65 was cognitively intact. Review of the facility investigation dated 8/29/2025, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance was provided related to showering and personal hygiene care for 4 of 5 (Resident #2, #3, #89 and #148) sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, revealed .Residents will be provided with care to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good .grooming and personal and oral hygiene .Appropriate care and services will be provided for the residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently .including assistance with .hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care) . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Hemiparesis and Morbid Obesity. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff were dispensing and accurately administering medications and treatments per Physician's Orders for 4 of 32 (Residents #3 #41, #51, and #148) residents reviewed. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration, dated 7/2023, revealed .Medications are administered as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have familiarized themselves with the medications.Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician.The resident's MAR/EHR [Medication Administration Record/Electronic Health Record] is initialed by the person administering the medication, in the space provided under the date and on the line for that specific medication dose administration time. 2. Review of the medical record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to store medication in accordance with facility policy when medication was found unsecured at the beside for 4 of 32 (Resident #11, # 72, #122, and #148) residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage, dated 4/2025, revealed .The facility is responsible for maintaining proper storage.All medication will be stored according to state and federal laws and regulations.Oral (solid) medication-stored in medication carts except those requiring refrigeration.All medication with routes other than PO (oral) must be stored in separate compartments in medication cart, medication room cabinets, or refrigerator. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Arthritis, Chronic Pancreatitis, Anemia, and Hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to prevent the potential spread of infection were maintained when 1 of 4 nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A) failed to disinfect reusable resident equipment for 1 of 5 (Resident #151) residents observed during medication administration. The findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident -Care Items and Equipment, revealed .Resident-care equipment, including reusable items.will be cleaned and disinfected.Reusable items are cleaned and disinfected or sterilized between residents.Reusable resident care equipment is decontaminated and/or sterilized between residents. Review of medical record revealed Resident #151 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Dementia, Hypertension, and Schizophrenia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services when 1 of 3 (Resident #18) discharged sample residents reviewed did not receive a personal refund within 30 days of discharge. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Funds Policy and Procedure, dated 2025, revealed .To ensure that.residents have access to, and are able to manage, their personal funds.Conveyance upon discharge, eviction, or death.Upon discharge, eviction, or death of a resident with a personal fund deposited with the facility, the facility shall convey within 30 days, the resident's funds, and a final accounting of those funds, to the resident, his or her legal representative. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #18 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Psychotic Disorder with Delusions, Dementia, and Hypertension. Resident #18 was discharged to another facility on 12/13/2025. Review of the facility's Patient Fund Request…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide information regarding a resident's right to formulate an Advanced Directive for 21 of 32 sampled residents (Resident #1, #3, #14, #21, #26, #31, #33, #41, #47, #55, #65, #66, #70, #71, #75, #87, #88, #102, #106, #112, and #115) reviewed for Advanced Directives. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives, dated 12/2023, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive .On admission, the facility will determine if the resident has executed an advance directive, and if not, determine whether the resident would like to formulate an advance directive and will provide Advance Directive information if requested . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide effective housekeeping and maintenance services to ensure a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment as evidenced by the odor of urine in Resident's rooms, the 200 and 300 hallways, dirty privacy curtains, standing water in resident's bathroom sinks and in basins, and a loose handrail observed in the 100 Hall. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy, titled, Preventive Maintenance Program, with a revision date of 9/2023, revealed, . A Preventive Maintenance Program shall be developed and implemented to ensure the provision of a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environmental for residents, staff, and the public .The Maintenance Director is responsible is responsible for developing and maintaining a schedule of maintenance services to ensure that the buildings, grounds, and equipment are maintained in a sage and operable manner . Review of the facility's procedure titled, Resident Room Cleaning and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions as evidenced by staff using bare hands to prepare food, unlabeled, undated food items, and dirty equipment. The facility had a census of 131 with 124 of those residents receiving a tray from the Kitchen. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy Food Preparation and Service, dated 10/2017, revealed .Food and nutrition services employees shall prepare and serve food in a manner that complies with safe handling practices .Bare hand contact with food is prohibited. Gloves must be worn when handling food directly . Review of the facility's policy Food Receiving and Storage, dated 10/2017, revealed .Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices .All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated ['use by date] . opened containers must be dated Review of the facility's policy Food Safety Requirements, dated 12/2023, revealed .Food will be stored,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating condition for 4 of 4 (Hall 100 shower room stall #2, Hall 200 shower room stall #2, Hall 300 shower room stall #2 and Hall 400 shower room stall #2) shower rooms and for 1 of 2 elevators (200 hall elevator) reviewed for safe operating equipment. The findings included: 1. The Maintenance Director and Maintenance Team Lead and the surveyor's checked showers rooms stalls on 5/14/2024 beginning at 11:05 AM, and revealed the following: 100 hall shower room stall #2 was capped off. 200 hall shower room stall #2 was capped off. 300 hall shower room stall #2 was capped off. 400 hall shower room stall #2 was capped off. During an interview on 5/14/2024 at 9:43 AM, the Maintenance Director confirmed that they had capped off one shower stall in each residents' shower room and stated, .water coming out of the sprayer and the shower head at the same time [referring to hall 100 shower room] .water wasn't getting hot enough due to coming out at both places . During an interview on 5/14/2024 at 11:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to treat all residents with dignity and respect when 3 of 19 staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) - CNA S, and CNA T), and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) LPN U) failed to knock and announce themselves before entering a resident's room during dining The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's Resident Rights, undated policy revealed, .These rights include the resident's right to . dignified existence, be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity . 2. Observation during the Hall 300 dining on 4/29/2027 at 11:35 AM, revealed CNA S entered Resident #2's room and failed to knock or announce themself before entering resident's room. 3. Observation during the Hall 300 dining on 4/29/2024 at 11:49 AM, revealed CNA T entered Resident #15's room and failed to knock or announce themself before entering the resident's room. 4. Observation during the Hall 300 dining on 4/29/2024 at 11:55 AM, revealed LPN U entered Resident #26's room and failed to knock or announce themself before entering the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of emergency transfers for 1 of 1 (Resident #66) sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's undated policy, .Notice of Discharge to Ombudsman Policy Statement, revealed .A copy of the transfer notice may be sent .such as a list of residents on a monthly basis . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Metabolic Encephalopathy, Dysphagia, Aphasia, Hemiplegia, Dementia, Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension, and Contracture of Left Hand. Review of the Progress Notes dated 2/21/2024, revealed .Called to resident room .lying on left side of floor .Md [physician] called with new orders to transport to [Named Hospital] for evaluation . Review of the Hospital's ED [Emergency Department] Note dated 2/21/2024, revealed Resident #66 was in the ED for evaluation. The facility was unable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to accurately assess residents for Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scores, falls, discharge disposition, and diagnoses for 5 of 32 sampled residents (Resident #41, #47, #66, #86 and #128) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia, Aphasia, Dysphagia, Dysarthria, Pseudobulbar Affect, Sleep Disorder, and Alcohol and Cocaine Abuse. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS assessment was indicated and not completed. During an interview on 5/2/2024 at 11:20 AM, the MDS Coordinator confirmed the BIMS should have been completed. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis including Diabetes, Kidney Failure, Psychotic Disorder with Delusions, and Heart Failure. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, review of Skin Check sheets, and interview the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance related to bathing was provided for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #80) reviewed for ADL care. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Showers, revised 3/2023, revealed, .It is the practice of this facility to assist residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene, stimulate circulation and help prevent skin issues as per current standards of practice .Residents will be provided showers as per request or as per facility schedule protocols and based upon resident safety . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Spastic Quadriplegic Cerebral Palsy, Chronic Kidney Disease, Diabetes, Hypertension and Depression. Review of the Quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation and interview the facility failed to provide care and services for an indwelling catheter (a tube in the bladder that drains urine) for 1 of 1 (Resident #44) sampled resident reviewed for indwelling catheters. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Foley Catheter Care, revised 6/2023, revealed .The purpose of catheter care is to prevent possible urinary tract infections from bacteria spreading from the perineal area and external catheter into the urinary tract . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Osteomyelitis, Obstructive Uropathy, Hemiplegia, Cerebral Infarction, Hypertension, and Arteriosclerotic Heart Disease. Review of the Care Plan dated 3/13/2024, revealed .has an indwelling Catheter: Obstructive uropathy .Assess/record/report to MD for s/sx [signs and symptoms] UTI: pain, burning, blood tinged urine, cloudiness, no output, deepening of urine color,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure medication was stored securely when medications were left unattended in resident rooms for 1 of 61 sampled (Resident #31) and when 2 of 7 medication carts (Back up medication cart and the 100 hall medication cart) were left unlocked, unattended and out of staff's line of sight. The findings include: 1. Observation in Resident #31's room on 5/1/2024 at 11:01 AM, revealed Resident #31 lying in bed, 2 white pills in a cup on her overbed table. Resident #31 asked for some water so she could take her medicine. LPN B was not present in the room. During an interview on 5/01/2024 at 11:13 AM, LPN B was asked what medication was left at Resident #31's bedside. LPN B stated, .potassium tablet and Vitamin D . LPN B confirmed she left the medications at the bedside because she got busy and didn't make it back to administer the medication. 2. Observation of the 100 hall Nurse's station on 5/06/2024 beginning at 4:21 PM, revealed the Back up medication cart was unlocked, unattended, and out of line of sight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, facility document review, medical record review, and interview revealed the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete medical record for 1 of 32 (Resident #66) sampled residents reviewed. Resident #66 ' s medical record contained an inaccurate Neurological check (an evaluation of brain and nervous system function). The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Charting Errors and/or Omissions, revised 2006 revealed .Accurate medical records shall be maintained by this facility . Review of the facility policy titled, NEUROLOGICAL ASSESSMENT & FLOW SHEET, dated 12/2023, revealed .Any time an individual has an injury to the head .a Neuro Assessment needs to be done .Put the exact time that the [neurological] check was done and not when it was supposed to be done .exact time is important . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Metabolic Encephalopathy, Dysphagia, Aphasia, Hemiplegia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' care plans were reviewed, revised, and updated for 6 of 6 (Residents #1, #7, #9, #10, #11, and #13) sampled residents reviewed for falls and for 1 of 3 (Resident #11) sampled residents reviewed for weight loss. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised 3/2022, revealed, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident .The comprehensive, person centered care plan .describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being .Care plan interventions are chosen only after data gathering, proper sequencing of events, careful consideration of the relationship between the resident's problem areas…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with bowel/bladder incontinence received incontinence care for 4 residents (Resident #10, #11, #12, #13) of 5 residents reviewed for incontinent care. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility's policy titled Incontinent Care, revealed .Purpose: To outline a procedure for cleansing the perineum, and buttocks after an incontinence episode or with daily care, to assist in maintaining skin integrity. Incontinent checks/care should be provided Q [every] 2 hrs [hours] and PRN [as needed] . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Adult Failure to Thrive, Vascular Dementia, Pseudobulbar Affect, and Anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #10 had severely impaired cognition, required extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility, personal hygiene/bathing, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for wound/skin care as prescribed for 3 of 5 (Resident #10, #12, and #13) sampled residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Physician Services dated 4/1/2020, revealed .Policy Statement The medical care of each resident is under the supervision of a Licensed Physician .The resident's Attending Physician is responsible for prescribing new therapy, ordering a transfer to the hospital .to ensure that the resident receives quality care and medical treatment . Review of the facility's policy Medication and Treatment Orders revised July 2016, revealed .Orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing .Medication shall be administered only upon written order of a person duly licensed and authorized to prescribe such medications in the state . 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, Facility Reported Incident (FRI) review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to be free from misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 2 (Resident #6) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised 2/2021, revealed, .Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include .be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, revised 9/2022, revealed, .All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management . If resident abuse, neglect,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse and injury of unknown origin within 2 hours after the alleged violation and failed to report to the appropriate State Agencies for 2 of 6 (Resident #10 and Resident #11) sampled residents reviewed for abuse and resident rights. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised 2/2021, revealed, .Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include .be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, revised 9/2022, revealed, .If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, Facility Reported Incident, (FRI) review, medical record review, facility investigation review, and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse (misappropriation) for 1 of 2 (Resident #6) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, revised 9/2022, revealed .All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management . Upon receiving any allegations .the administrator is responsible for determining what actions (if any) are needed for the protection of residents . Follow-up Report .Within five (5) business days of the incident, the administrator will provide a follow-up investigation report . 2. Medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions as evidenced by a dirty ice machine and milk cooler, rusted tables and shelves, loose food particles in the freezer, dusty storage shelves, boxes stored on the floor, open and undated items in the cooler, pots and pans with carbon build-up and a greasy brown substance, and dirty floors and doors. The facility had a census of 139 residents with 125 of those residents receiving a tray from the kitchen. The findings include: 1. The facility's undated CLEANING . policy documented, .Food and Nutrition Services staff shall maintain the sanitation of the Food and Nutrition Services Department . The facility's undated HOW TO CLEAN AND SANITIZE POTS, PANS . policy documented, .Participants will learn proper method of cleaning and sanitizing pots and pans . The facility's undated ICE MACHINE CLEANING . policy documented, .Participants will understand how to wash and sanitize an ice machine .ice chest should be washed and sanitized daily . The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-07-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 10 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, #3, #8, and Registered Nurse (RN) #1) nurses administered medications with a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%). A total of 4 errors were observed out of 36 opportunities, resulting in an error rate of 11.11%. The findings include: 1. The facility's undated MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION-GENERAL GUIDELINES policy documented, .Prior to administration, the medication and dosage schedule on the resident's medication administration record (MAR) is compared with the medication label .Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician .Medications are administered within 60 minutes of scheduled time . 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Hypertension, Morbid Obesity, Major Depressive Disorder, Heart Failure, Gastroesophageal and Reflux Disease. The Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications and chemicals were not stored in the same compartment, medications were dated when opened, not expired, and medications were secured and attended for 9 of 14 (Patriot and Tulip Split Hall Medication Cart, Sunflower Hall Medication Cart, Tulip Medication Room, [NAME] Hall Medication Cart, [NAME] Medication Room, [NAME] Hall Medication Cart, [NAME] Medication Room, Sunflower Medication Room, and Tulip Hall Medication Cart) medication storage areas. The findings include: 1. The facility's Undated STORAGE OF MEDICATIONS policy documented, .Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked or attended by persons with authorized access .Orally administered medications are separated from externally used medications .Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are immediately removed from stock . 2. Observations on the Patriot Hall and Tulip Split Medication Cart on 7/15/19 at 5:42 AM, revealed one carton…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 35 (Resident #128) sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: 1. The facility's MDS Assessment policy revised 3/2019 documented, .All MDS assessments (e.g.,admission, annual, significant change, quarterly review, etc.) and discharge and reentry records will be completed and electronically encoded .in accordance with current OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] regulations governing the transmission of MDS data .Quarterly (Non-Comprehensive) . 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #128 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Osteoporosis, Cerebral Palsy, Displaced Bicondylar Fracture Left Tibia, Morbid Obesity, and Diabetes Mellitus. Review of the facility's medical record revealed Resident #128 had an admission MDS assessment on 3/21/19. A quarterly MDS assessment would have been due on 6/21/19. The facility failed to complete a quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 31 (Resident #126) sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: 1. The facility's undated Care Planning Interdisciplinary Team policy documented, .A comprehensive care plan for each resident is developed within seven (7) days of completion of the resident assessment (MDS) [Minimum Data Set] . 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #126 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Tracheostomy, Multiple Sclerosis, Gastrostomy, Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, and Pericardial Effusion. Medical record review revealed the admission MDS was completed 6/21/19. The comprehensive care plan should have been completed by 6/28/19. The facility was unable to provide a comprehensive care plan for Resident #126. 3. Interview with MDS Coordinator #2 on 7/18/19 at 6:06 PM, in the Conference Room, MDS Coordinator #2 was asked what overdue meant in the Point Click Care system )the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards when unsecured chemicals were observed in 1 of 4 (100 Hall) shower rooms. The findings include: Observations in the 100 Hall shower room on 7/15/19 at 5:23 AM, 7:46 AM, 8:01 AM, and 8:14 AM, revealed (2) 1 gallon plastic containers of hair and body cleanser and (1) opened, unlabeled and unsealed plastic container, containing a clear yellowish liquid with a strong chemical odor. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 on 7/15/19 at 9:14 AM, in the 100 Hall shower room, CNA #1 was asked if the hair and body cleanser should be left out when not in use. CNA #1 stated, .no. CNA #1 was asked what is this clear yellowish liquid in the unlabeled, unsealed and opened gallon container. CNA #1 stated, .it is bleach . CNA #1 was then asked if these items should be stored unsecured, unsealed and unlabeled in the shower room. CNA #1 stated, No, they should be locked up. Interview with the Administrator on 7/18/19 at 6:19 PM, in the Administrator Office, the Administrator was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services for 1 of 1 (Resident #130) residents reviewed for dialysis. The findings include: 1. The facility's undated Dialysis Policy and Procedure documented, .When resident is sent to renal dialysis unit .copy of the Facility Dialysis Communication Record to accompany the resident .When the resident returns from renal dialysis unit .Review all test reports and the Dialysis Communication Record returned with the resident . 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #130 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Hypertension, and Diabetes. The 30 day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #130 received dialysis. Review of the dialysis communication record revealed the following forms were not completed prior to dialysis on 6/12/19, 6/21/19, 6/24/19, 6/26/19, 6/28/19, 7/8/19, 7/12/19, and 7/15/19. Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure weights were accurately obtained and recorded for 1of 4 (Resident #10) sampled residents reviewed for nutritional risk. The findings include: 1. The facility's undated Weight Monitoring policy documented, Monthly weights will be done by the C.N.A (Certified Nursing Assistant) .All weights will be documented in the weight record .Any resident with a weight of five-pound discrepancy will be reweighed by the charge nurse immediately .The charge nurse will be reweighing any discrepancy . 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Heart Failure, Hyertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Acute Kidney Failure, and Depressive Disorder. Review of the facility's Weights and Vitals Summary record dated 7/17/19 revealed no recorded weights for May 2019 and June 2019. Review of the facility's Weights and Vitals Summary record revealed a weight discrepancy of 27.2 pounds…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to prevent the potential spread of infection were followed when 1 of 1 (Resident #126) residents reviewed in transmission based precautions did not have isolation signage on the resident's door and 1 of 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8) nurses failed to perform proper hand hygiene during Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube care. The findings include: 1. The facility's undated Handwashing Technique policy documented, .To prevent and control transmission of infections, employees hands will be washed . 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #126 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Tracheostomy Status, Dysphagia, Gastrostomy Status, Multiple Sclerosis, Diabetes Mellitus, and Hypertension. A physician's order dated 6/25/19 documented, .contact isolation d/t [due to] MRSA [Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus] [a bacterium with antibiotic resistance] in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$810,404 in federal fines across 9 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $285,904 — penalty dated 2024-05-08
  • $4,893 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
  • $13,635 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
  • $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
  • $11,538 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
  • $476,254 — penalty dated 2023-08-24
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-11 for 129 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-09-23 for 129 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EPHRAM LAHASKY — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HALPERT, NAOMIIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF8%since 01/01/2025
SCHACHTER FAMILY 2015 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 11/27/2018
YDGK LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST11%since 11/27/2018
DAVID M FISTEL TN LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/27/2018
LME FAMILY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2019
MAJESTIC OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
ML FAMILY TREE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
FISTEL, DAVIDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
FRIEDMAN, STEVENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
KOHN, BRIANIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SCHACHTER, ARTHURIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
NEWPOINT REAL ESTATE CAPITAL LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 01/01/2025
BERKLEY, NATALIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2025
IWUJI, KELECHIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 6%Other / private 19%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$327per resident / day
operating cost
$9,935per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$300per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Tennessee Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Tennessee
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,845/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 445150. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next