The Orchards at Armada

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 125 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 67 beds and averages 64.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.69 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.32 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake M100141494. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent an elopement for one resident (R701) who had severe cognitive impairment, a high risk for falls, a known elopement risk, and demonstrated multiple attempts to exit the facility shortly before the elopement occurred. R701 eloped from the facility on 11/06/23 between 7:30 PM and 8 PM through the South exit door, without triggering the door alarm and unwitnessed by staff. In response to R701's repeated attempts to exit the South exit door, a staff member (Certified Nurse Assistant -CNA C) placed a geri-chair in front of the door to discourage R701 from approaching the door. CNA C exited another resident's room after providing care, and noticed the geri-chair had been moved and did not see R701. CNA C notified staff (Licensed Practical Nurse -LPN B) on the unit and they went out the South exit door and R701 was located sitting in the driver's seat of a facility van in the parking lot. R701, had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative services were provided timely for one resident (R902) of four reviewed for range of motion (ROM) and mobility. Findings include: On 05/06/26 at 9:50 AM, R902 was observed laying on their back in bed saying they entered the facility to learn how to walk and could not currently walk and was not in therapy. R902 reported they had been in therapy while at the facility but did not recall why they were discharged from therapy and required assistance to get out of bed. On 05/06/26 at 12:50 PM, R902's information was reviewed with Physical Therapist (PT) A. PT A reported R902 was on the therapy caseload from 02/25/26 to 04/03/26 and was discharged due to R902 reaching their highest practicable level. Bed mobility at discharge was supervision (just standby resident) and was supervision for walking 50-100 feet with a walker. PT A reported R902 as able to get up and walk without physical assistance. PT A reported R902 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2786506.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a wound status condition update to specialist for one resident (R901) of three residents reviewed for wounds. Findings Include:A complaint called into the State Agency indicated, Neither (name of consulting physician) and/or myself or my family members-who were visited daily- were never notified that there was an infection going on with (name of R901's) leg. (Name of consulting physician) sent (name of R901) to emergency immediately .Review of the clinical record revealed R901 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R901's diagnoses included Chronic ulcer of the right ankle (open wound right lower leg) and Varicose veins of Right lower extremity (RLE) with ulcer. The record revealed the resident was to have a wound vac (a vacuum dressing over a wound to promote healing) as ordered by a Wound Care Clinic Consulting Specialist (WCCCS). R901 had a follow-up visit on 12/4/2025 with the WCCCS where the wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide feeding assistance in a dignified manner for one (R15) of six residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: On 06/09/25 at 12:14 PM, during an observation of the lunch service in the memory care unit dining room, Volunteer C was observed providing feeding assistance to R15 who was sitting up in a chair. Throughout the observation Volunteer C was in a standing position adjacent to the resident and was observed intermittently attending to another resident. On 06/10/25 at 10:54 AM, the facility Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed and reported the expectation is that staff providing one to one feeding assistance should not do so in a standing position and that ideally, they would not assist more than one resident at a time in order to maintain resident dignity. Review of the facility record for R15 revealed an admission date of 12/18/23 with diagnoses including Dementia and Dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). R15's physician orders included an active order dated 12/21/23 stating 1:1 feeding,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line care was performed consistant with professional standards of practice for one resident R42 of one whose Intravenous (IV) medication administration was observed. Findings include: On 06/08/25 at 3:56 PM, R42 was observed to be in bed with their head resting on their left hand and forearm. The PICC line dressing was observed to have a folded white gauze approximately two inches by two inches under a transparent dressing covering the insertion site, dated 06/01/25. R42 confirmed the dressing was being changed weekly and was receiving an IV antibiotic daily. A review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) and Medication Administration Record (MAR) for June 2025 documented the PICC line was last changed 06/01/25 and the IV antibiotic was infused daily. On 06/09/25 at 2:19 PM, IV medication administration for R42 was observed with Registered Nurse (RN)A and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B. RN A donned gloves, cleaned the hub of the PICC line and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line care infection control measures and hand hygiene during meal assistance was performed for two residents (R42 and R15) of three residents reviewed for infection prevention. Findings include: R42 On 06/09/25 at 2:19 PM, IV medication administration for R42 was observed with Registered Nurse (RN)A and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B. RN A was observed to complete hand hygiene on the way into the room. A sign on the wall at the right side of the doorway indicated enhanced barrier precautions were required and a gown and gloves were to be used when providing care via a central line such as the PICC line. A cart with the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was at the right hand side of the doorway. RN A entered the room without a gown on and proceeded to hang the IV bag on the IV pole. RN A handed the IV administration tubing to LPN B. RN A then reached into their left pants pocket and removed a pair of gloves and donned them. The IV line was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure opened food items were dated and discarded when expired, and failed to maintain the filter for the ice machine. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food. Findings include: On 5/22/24 between 8:30 AM-9:00 AM, during a tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM) L, the following items were observed: In the Blue Air reach-in cooler, there was an opened package of deli turkey dated 4/25, and an opened, undated package of salami. DM L stated both items would be discarded. In the Traulsen reach-in cooler, there was an opened 1 gallon container of Caesar dressing dated 3/25, and an opened container of Enchilada sauce dated 3/14. DML stated they should be discarded 30 days after opening. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 3-501.17: Ready-to-eat, potentially hazardous food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan for one resident (R56) out of one reviewed for care plans. Findings Include: On 5/21/2024 at 9:46 AM, R56 was observed in their bed with a breakfast tray in front of them. R56 was observed attempting to eat some of their applesauce. R56 was noted to have pureed textured food. A review of the tray ticket stated R56 was supposed to be a 1:1 assist with feeding, no one was noted to be in the room. A review of the medical record revealed R56 admitted into the facility on 3/13/2024 with the following diagnoses, Dysphagia following Cerebral Infarction and Aphasia. Further review of the medical record revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 2/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R56 also required assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the care plan revealed the following intervention, No straws and no fluids at bedside. On 5/21/2024 at 9:49 AM, 9:50 AM, 5/21/2023 at 12:04 PM, 12:59 PM, 5/22/2024 at 8:58 AM, 5/22/2024 at 12:59 PM, and 5/23/2024 at 9:54 AM, R56…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meal assistance and positioning were provided for two residents (R53, R56) of five whose care needs and activities of daily living (ADLs) were reviewed. Findings include: R53 On 05/21/24 at 9:41 AM, R53 was observed to be supine in bed. Three pillows were stacked behind the shoulders and head. R53 appeared frail with decreased muscle mass and visible bony prominences in the face, shoulders and arms. R53 leaned over toward the left side of the bed. The head of the bed was up around 45 degrees. The breakfast of scrambled eggs had not been touched. R53 was asked if they needed help to eat and said yes and appeared to fall asleep. On 05/21/24 at 11:54 AM, R54 was observed to be supine in bed, the head of bed up around 45 degrees, leaned over toward the left side of the bed and appeared asleep. The breakfast tray previously observed had not been eaten. On 05/21/24 at 1:03 PM and 1:14 PM, R53 was observed to be hunched down in the bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to apply heel protecters and lids to drinks per physician orders for one resident (R5) out of one reviewed for physician orders. Findings include: On 5/21/2024 at 10:00 AM, R5 was observed in bed. R5 stated they had just started to eat breakfast because they were waiting on their coffee to come. R5 stated they had just received their coffee and was now about to eat breakfast. R5's coffee cup was observed to not have a lid on it. R5 was asked if they like to get out of bed often. R5 stated that get out the bed when they feel like it. R5 was noted to not have anything on their heels and their heels were resting on the mattress. A review of the medical record revealed that R5 admitted into the facility on 6/22/2023 with the following diagnoses, Muscle Weakness and Difficulty in Walking. Further review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R5 also required assistance with bed mobility and transfer. Further review of active…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) leg strap/band was in place and tubing positioned to allow for urine to drain for one resident (R367) of one reviewed for catheters. Findings include: On 05/21/24 at 9:59 AM, R367 was observed to be supine in bed and dressed in a hospital style gown. The connection point for the urinary catheter and drainage bag tubing was visible on the left leg and no strap was observed to prevent tension on the insertion site/urethra was in place. R367 was asked about the urinary catheter and leg strap and commented that it (the catheter) may be removed the next day. R367 reported they had been in the facility a few days. On 05/21/24 at 1:35 PM, rehab staff were in the residents room with resident. The urinary catheter drainage tubing was looped and on the floor. On 05/21/24 at 1:56 PM, rehab staff had exited the room. The urinary catheter drainage tubing remained looped and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,887 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,887 — penalty dated 2023-12-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ORCHARDS MICHIGAN — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI