No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Orchards at Harper Woods

19840 Harper Avenue, Harper Woods, MI 48225 · For profit - Corporation · 151 certified beds · (313) 881-9556 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (313) 881-9556 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
20043 Mack Ave · (313) 884-9100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
19230 Harper Ave · (313) 473-8712 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
19230 Harper Ave · (313) 881-7272 · Call to confirm hours
Park
19430 Harper Ave · (313) 343-2560 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.7%10.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.0%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.8%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.5%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.1%12.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.1%19.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.8%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%5.1%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.7%20.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.1%14.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine67.9%79.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.6%24.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.5%11.7%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.631.841.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.051.641.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 52 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 57% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.2%CMS range 27.4–57.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.3–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge32.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge46.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened9.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.5–10.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.261.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.27
RN hours/ resident / day
1.13
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.31
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.71
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 151 beds and averages 131.4 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-07)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-07 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the exterior trash refuse area in a clean manner, resulting in the potential for odors and the attraction of pests and rodents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors. Findings include:On 5/5/26 at approximately 9:00 AM, the exterior dumpster area was observed with a pile of various trash items on the ground behind the dumpster, and the trash was sitting in a pool of stagnant, standing water. When queried on 5/5/26 at 2:30 PM, the Maintenance Director confirmed the trash buildup and stated one of his guys had already gone out and cleaned it up. Review of the facility's undated policy Physical Plant Exterior Maintenance On 5/7/26 at 11:00 AM noted: Building Grounds 1. Clean the building's exterior and grounds of all trash, rubbish, debris, unused equipment/furniture, in addition to periodic cleaning of problem areas.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 3004617Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers as scheduled and per resident preferred frequency for three (R1, R11, R118) of five residents reviewed for showers and failed to provide set up and feeding assistance for one (R104) of one resident reviewed for feeding assistance. Findings include: R1 On 05/05/2026 at 11:27 AM, R1 was interviewed at bedside and reported they were not getting their showers. R1 was asked if they preferred a bed bath or a shower and reported they preferred a shower and denied refusing showers. Review of the facility record revealed R1 was initially admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction with Left Hemiplegia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R1's cognition was intact and they were dependent on staff for bathing. On 05/07/2026 at 11:01 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D was interviewed and asked how they know their schedule of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive pressure ulcer care plan with goals, interventions, and desired outcomes for one resident (R35) out of seven residents reviewed for care planning. Findings include:On 05/06/2026 at 2:27 PM, R35 was observed lying in bed on an air mattress with the air mattress pump device resting face down on the floor near the foot of the bed. Registered Nurse (RN) F, who was nearby in the hallway, was asked if the air mattress pump was on. Along with the nurse, the device was observed to be off.A review of R35's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed they were admitted into the facility 10/01/2024 with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), weakness, and vascular dementia. R35's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, indicating that they were not able to complete their mental status interview. Review of section M of this MDS revealed R35 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise and implement specific interventions on the fall care plan following a fall for one resident (R41) of seven reviewed for accidents. Findings include:On 5/5/26 at 10:00 AM, R41 was interviewed and asked if they had ever fallen at the facility. R41 indicated they had bumped their leg on their wheelchair a few days ago. A review of an incident/accident report involving R41 revealed the following, 3/1/2026 .Description: At approximately 4:00 PM, resident was observed .sitting in wheelchair and slid down from chair on to [their] buttocks .Resident found sitting on floor. Resident assisted back to wheelchair .Action Taken: Resident assessed head-to-toe. Vital signs obtained. No injuries noted . A review of R41's fall care plan and interventions revealed no additional fall interventions had been added to their care plan following their fall on 3/1/26. A further review of R41's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R41 was originally admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 3004617.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician ordered heel boots and palm protectors for two residents (R14 and R45) and implement orders following a change in skin for one resident (R113) out of four reviewed for quality of care. Findings include:R14A review of the medical record revealed that R14 admitted into the facility on 5/10/2021 with the following medical diagnoses, Hypertension and Peripheral Vascular Disease. A review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 9/15, indicating an impaired cognition. R14 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the physician's orders noted the following, Order: Heel Protectors while in bed as tolerated.Status: Active.On 5/5/2026 at 1:45 PM, R14 was observed in bed. No heel boots were observed in place.On 5/6/2026 at 8:56 AM and 11:09 AM, R14 was observed in bed. No heel boots were in place.On 5/7/2026 at 9:05 AM, an interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to check and replace a wander guard (bracelet style device used to help prevent elopement) for one resident (R43) out of two reviewed for supervision. Findings include:On [DATE] at 12:49 PM, R45 was observed self-propelling in their wheelchair aimlessly throughout the hallway. R45 was observed wearing a wander guard on their right ankle.A review of the medical record revealed R43 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses, Major Depressive Disorder and Psychotic Disorder with Delusions. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, indicating R43 was unable to complete the assessment and required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the physician orders revealed the following, Wander Guard EXP May2025 FCC ID: KNKTX0003 A20080903 430KHZ, check for placement/ working properly, test and expiration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store medications for one resident (R123) of one reviewed for medication storage. Findings include:On 05/05/2026 at 10:54 AM, the surveyor entered into the room of R123 who was not visibly seen at that time. An observation of their bedside table revealed a medication cup containing approximately 10 pills. R123 at this time exited the bathroom and was asked about the medications. R123 explained they were going to take them but had to use the bathroom first. On 05/05/2026 at 11:03 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was observed in the hallway and was requested to make the observation of R123's medications. The DON observed the medications, and requested the resident consume the medications in their presence. The DON asked the resident why they hadn't taken their medication and they explained they had to use the bathroom first. A review of R123's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 4/4/23 with diagnoses which included Heart Disease, Anxiety and Hyperlipidemia. Further review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow dentist recommendations for follow-up appointments for two residents (R56 and R86) out of two residents reviewed for dental services. Findings include:R56 On 5/5/2026 at 2:07 PM, R56 was observed laying in bed eating lunch. R56 was noted to have teeth missing. R56 was unable to recall if they had never seen a dentist in the facility. A review of the medical record revealed that R56 admitted into the facility on 6/30/2023 with the following medical diagnoses, End Stage Heart Failure and Anemia. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6/15, indicating an impaired cognition. R56 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of a dental consult dated 11/20/2026 noted the following, Action Required by Nursing Home Staff: Recommend patient be seen by an outside dentist, likely in a hospital setting, comprehensive care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 2696242, 2694434, and 2696027. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent verbal abuse for one resident (R604) and resident to resident physical abuse for two residents (R603 and R605), out of three reviewed for abuse. Findings include:R604 On 12/18/25 at 10:33AM, R604 was asked about the incident that occurred with Nurse A. R604 reported, at around 7:30pm they had pressed their call light to get pain medication and some cough syrup. R604 explained it was an hour later at 9:00 PM, when Nurse A told R604 that she was unable to give them their medications at that time because she had just received the keys. R604 reported they followed Nurse A to the medication cart and they started having an argument with each other. R604 explained they called Nurse A names and that she called R604 names. A review of R604's medical record revealed, R604 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder. A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty for eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week potentially affecting all 132 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: A review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report for the 1st quarter of 2025 (October 1 to December 31) revealed the facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing. A review of requested Daily Staffing Sheets from the 1st quarter of 2025 revealed the following dates without RN coverage: 10/15/25, 10/16/25, 10/25/25, 11/6/24, 11/13/24, 11/14/24, 11/18/24, 11/19/24, 11/20/24, 12/7/24 and 12/24/24. On 3/25/25 at 9:43 AM, Staff Scheduler D was interviewed regarding RN coverage and explained that it is difficult to hire and retain registered nurses, and explained that call in's occur often. On 3/25/25 at 3:57 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked for her expectations in ensuring RN coverage was adequate, and she explained that the expectation is that there be coverage. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-25 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure certified nurse aides (CNAs) completed the required 12 hours of in-service education annually for three (E, F, and G) of five CNAs reviewed for inservice education. Findings include: A review of the following three certified nurse aide annual 12-hour nurse aide training/ in-services were reviewed: CNA E was hired on 3/1/22. There were no 12-hour training/ in-services provided by the facility. CNA F was hired on 3/16/22. There were no 12-hour training/ in-services provided by the facility. CNA G was hired on 3/14/17. There were no 12-hour training/ in-services provided by the facility. On 3/25/25 at 3:37 PM, Staff Developer B was asked about the missing 12 hours of training, and explained that she is new in the position, and acknowledged that she has been trained differently on when and how CNA's 12 hours of training annually were met. On 3/25/25 02:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked about the 12 hours of CNA training not being completed, and she explained her expectation is that CNAs meet their required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to timely revise care plans to accurately reflect identified problems and interventions for one resident (R55) of one residents. Findings include: On 3/23/23 at 9:00 AM, R55 was noted in their room noted laying halfway off the bed and on the floor. R55 was noted to be in a wet brief which was hanging off. When asked about about the care, R55 appeared confused and stated they were unsure about what to do. On 3/24/25 at 8:45 AM, R55 was observed in their room with a shirt on, no brief, no non-slip socks, looking for something to eat. On 03/25/25 at 9:00 AM, R55 observed in their room walking barefoot. A review of R55's electronic medical record revealed R55 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Acute Respiratory Failure, Dementia, Anxiety and Macular Degeneration. A review of R55's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated on 12/26/2024 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental status (BIMS) assessment of 13 indicating resident is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adaptive equipment for one resident (R40) out of three reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Findings include: On 3/24/2025 at 2:18 PM, R40 was observed in their room eating lunch. R40 was observed trying to pick their water cup up and dropped the cup on themselves. R40's water cup was noted to be in a foam cup. R40 reported they usually have a smaller sippy cup that makes it easier for them to drink their water. R40 reported the cup broke about two months ago and someone stated they were ordering a new one. R40 indicated they had not heard anything else about the new cup. A review of the medical record revealed that R40 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses, Epilepsy and Dysphagia. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment score of 10/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R40 also required staff assistance with bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete and document skin treatments for one resident (R93) of one reviewed for skin treatments/documentation. Findings include: On 3/23/25 at 9:24 AM, R93 was observed sitting on the side of their bed, right leg observed wrapped in a bandage and undated. R93 explained that they had gotten into an accident which caused the wound on their leg, but was unsure of the last date their bandage had been changed. A review of R93's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Cellulitis of the Right Lower Limb and Peripheral Vascular Disease. Further review revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and required limited assistance with toilet use, bathing, and dressing. Further review of the medical record revealed the following physician order dated 1/8/25, Right Lower Leg: Cleanse with Wound Cleaner, pat dry apply medihoney cover with Abd (abdominal pads) and kerlex. every day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to turn, reposition, and implement offloading interventions to prevent further skin breakdown for one resident (R85) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: On 3/24/25 at 2:29 PM, R85 was observed laying on their backside without pillows under either side of R85's body. On 3/25/25 at 9:12 AM and 11:15 AM, R85 was observed laying on their backside without pillows under either side of R85's body. A pillow was observed under R85's feet. On 3/25/25 at 12:19 PM, an observation of R85's wound was made, the wound was clean, with some slough present, and scar tissue was observed surrounding wound. On 3/25/25 at 2:05 PM, R85 was observed laying on their backside without pillows under either side of R85's body. Three pillows were observed laying in a chair. A review of R85 medical record revealed, R85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Encephalopathy. A review of R85's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply a splint/brace for one resident (R34) out of two reviewed for limited mobility. Findings include: On 3/24/2025 at 8:30 AM, R34 was observed laying in the bed, a towel was observed rolled up in their left hand. No brace/splint was observed to be in place. A review of the medical record revealed that R34 admitted into the facility with the following medical diagnoses, Dysphagia and Cerebral Infarction. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 99, indicating they were unable to complete the assessment. R34 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the physician orders revealed the following orders, B/L (Bilateral) elbow splint/hand splint .Active. On 3/25/2025 at 8:58 AM, R34 was observed laying in the bed, a towel was observed rolled up in their left hand. No brace/splint was observed to be in place. On 3/25/2025 at 11:57 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at a preferred and palatable temperature for three sampled residents (R20, R31, and R94) from a total of three sampled residents reviewed for food palatability. Findings include: R20 On 3/23/25 at 9:30 a.m., R20 was observed laying in the bed. R20 expressed several concerns pertaining to the meals. R20 saying, it is a shame that my daughter has to spend money to buy food so I can have something decent to eat. The vegetables served last week were cold and hard. A review of R20's electronic medical record revealed R55 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Bilateral Osteoarthritis of the knee, Major Depressive Disorder and Alcohol Abuse. A review of R20's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated on 2/08/2025 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental status (BIMS) assessment of 15 indicating resident is cognitively intact. R31 On 3/23/25 at 9:26 AM, R31 reported the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent and/or declination for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations for two residents (R34 and R92) out of five reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: On 03/25/2025 at 11:30 AM, the infection control task was completed with the Director of Nursing (DON) and acting Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) C. R34 A request was made to review the influenza and pneumonia consents and/or declinations for R34. ICP C stated they knew the responsible party for R34 refused all vaccinations, however they did not know where the papers were with the refusals. A review of the medical record revealed that R34 admitted into the facility with the following medical diagnoses, Dysphagia and Cerebral Infarction. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 99, indicating they were unable to complete the assessment. R34 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. No consent or declination was received by the end of survey. R92 A request was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent or declination for the COVID-19 immunization for two residents (R34 and R92) out of five reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: On 03/25/2025 at 11:30 AM, the infection control task was completed with the Director of Nursing (DON) and acting Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) C. R34 A request was made to review the Covid-19 consent or declination for R34. ICP C stated they knew that the responsible party for R34 refused all vaccinations, however they did not know where the papers were with the refusal. A review of the medical record revealed that R34 admitted into the facility with the following medical diagnoses, Dysphagia and Cerebral Infarction. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 99, indicating they were unable to complete the assessment. R34 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. No consent or declination was received by the end of survey. R92 A request was made to review the Covid-19 consent or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a tube feeding pole and floor in a sanitary manner for three sampled residents (R3, R19, and R85) out of five reviewed for tube feeding. Findings include: R3 On 3/23/25 at 10:01 AM, R3 was observed in bed with a tube feeding pole next to the bed. The pole and floor were observed with large amounts of dried formula on them. On 3/24/25 at 9:04 AM and at 2:27 PM, the tube feeding pole and floor was observed in the same condition. A review of R3's medical record noted, R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of Debility, Cardiorespiratory Conditions. A review of R3's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/2/25 noted, R3 with a severely impaired cognition and dependent of staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). A review of R3's order noted, in the evening Jevity 1.5 @60cc/hr x 16 hrs (hours) Up at 6pm for 16 hours or until dose complete to provide 960cc (cubic centimeter)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00148002. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to manage finances and assist with community banking services for one resident (R700) of three residents' reviewed for residents rights. Findings include: On [DATE] at approximately 10:00 AM, an interview was conducted with R700 regarding concerns with finances. R700 stated facility was harassing them about paying their bill and issued them an involuntary discharge notice. R700 presented the involuntary discharge form that was served to resident on [DATE]. R700 said I am upset because I like it here. I have the money but have trouble getting it from bank and my drivers license had expired. I want to pay it and stay here. My debit card only let's me get $500 a day. A review of R700's medical record revealed R700 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including spinal stenosis, osseous and subluxation stenosis of intervertebral foramina of the lumbar region, inflammatory spondylopathy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake MI00147481. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit readmission and/or provide proper notice of facility-initiated discharge for one resident (R702) following a hospitalization out of one reviewed for transfers and discharges. Findings include: A review of intake MI00147481 noted the following, Patient was seen and cleared by our behavioral health psych social worker on 10/10/24.Patient was also medically cleared to return to nursing facility on 10/10/24. [Facility name] refused to take patient back into their facility. Patient is a long-term resident at the facility and has been residing at the facility since March 2024. A review of the medical record revealed R702 admitted into the facility on 2/28/2024 with the following diagnoses, Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbances and Anxiety. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 5/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R702 also required assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intakes MI00147184 and MI00147299. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide fresh water in a timely manner for residents (R701, R702, R703, and R705) out of five reviewed for hydration. Findings include: A review of Intake MI00147299 noted the following, Complainant states [they] are not receiving fresh water daily. R701 On 10/9/2024 at 10:16 AM, R701's water was observed on the bedside table. The water was noted to be dated 10/9/2024 from 11PM-7AM. The water cup was noted to be warm and empty. At 12:04 PM and 12:54 PM, R701 was observed with the same water cup dated 10/9/2024 from 11PM-7AM. R701 stated they never provide them with fresh water and it is an ongoing problem. R702 On 10/9/2024 at 10:51 AM, R702's water was observed on the bedside table. The water was noted to be dated 10/9/2024 from 11PM-7AM. The water cup was noted to be warm and half full. On 10/9/2024 at 12:05 PM, R702 was noted to be in their wheelchair. R702 water cup was observed to be the same cup dated 10/9/2024 from 11PM-7AM. R702 stated they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00147226. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity and respect was maintain for one sampled resident (R704) of two reviewed for respect and dignity. Findings include: A review of the Intake allegations revealed, An allegation was reported the resident (R704) was verbally abused by an employee (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C). On 10/09/24 at 10:20 AM, R704 was asked about the incident with CNA C. R704 explained that during care, CNA C called them out of their name and referred to their buttocks as a rump roast. R704 further explained this was not the first time they had a problem with CNA C, and they were trying to deal with the ongoing things CNA C would say. R704 was asked if they shared the experiences they had with CNA C. R704 stated, they had conversations with the Unit Manager and the Wound Care Nurse (WC Nurse). R704 was asked how the incident affected them. R704 stated, I felt less than human. R704 continued and explained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intakes MI00147299 and MI00147184. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered, functioning and within reach for two residents (R702 and R704) out of three reviewed for call lights. Findings include: R702 On 10/9/2024 at 10:51 AM, R702 was observed in bed and stated they were ready to get dressed and in the chair. R702 was asked if they had pressed (activated) their call light. R702 stated they did not know where the call light was at. An observation of the call light unit on the wall noted that there was no cord for R702 to push the call light. R702 was asked how long they have been without a call light. R702 stated they did not know. On 10/9/2024 at 10:53 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B was shown the call light unit on the wall and R702 did not have a call light button. CNA B proceeded to switch the call light cord out and stated they were going to notify maintenance. CNA B stated they did not know the call light button for R702 was missing. On 10/9/2024 at 12:05 PM, R702 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citiation pertains to Intake: MI00146442 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment potentially affecting all 129 residents whom reside in the facility. Findings include: On 9/5/24 at 9:03AM, 10:19 AM, 11:10 AM, and at 12:20 AM, a wheelchair was observed in the hallway outside room [ROOM NUMBER] with a pile of dirty clothing on it. On 9/5/24 at 9:18AM, 10:24 AM, and 11:10 AM, a bag of dirty linen was observed on the floor next to the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 9/5/24 at 9:21 AM, 10:23 AM, and 11:10 AM, a bag of dirty linen was observed on the counter in the anteroom outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 9/5/24 at 9:24 AM, 10:20 AM, and 12:20 AM, a pile of dirty linen was observed on the floor by the window in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 9/5/24 at 10:12 AM and 11:08 AM, a dirty towel and a dirty pair of socks were observed on the windowsill in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 9/5/24 at 10:15AM, 11:33 AM, and 1:00PM, A bag of trash and a bag of dirty linen were observed in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citiation pertains to intake: MI00145394. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide scheduled showers for one sampled resident (R903) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Findings include: R903 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Juvenile rheumatoid Polyarthrititis. A review of R903's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed, R903 with an intact cognition and dependent of staff to complete activities of daily living (ADL). On 9/5/24 at 12:00 PM, R903 was observed lying in bed, above their bed there was a sign that noted, Shower Schedule M (Monday) & Th (Thursday) 7pm -7am. R903 was asked about the sign and explained that is to remind staff but they still don't get their showers. R903 was asked the last time they had a shower. R903 was unable to remember but did say it was in August. A review of shower documentation revealed, N/A (not applicable) on 8/1/, 8/8, 8/15, 8/29, and 9/2/24. On 9/5/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citiation pertains to Intake: MI00146442. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely podiatry care for one resident (R902) out of one reviewed for foot care. Findings include: On 9/5/2024 at 11:40 AM, during an interview, R902 explained their toenails were very long and it was painful to put shoes on and it took a long time to get them cut. On 9/5/2024 at 11:56 AM, Social worker (SW) A was asked to review R902's record for podiatry care. SW A then replied R902 was admitted in October (2023) and was not seen by podiatry until August (2023). Then stated It looks like she may have been seen in April (2024), but was unable to provide a treatment record. SW A said that even if R902 was seen in April they would have been due for another visit at least in June and confirmed that visit did not take place. SW A was asked if there was a written policy and procedure for podiatry care to which she responded no. A review of R902's electronic medical record revealed that they were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen and employee breakroom resulting in an increased potential for cross contamination of food and foodborne illness, potentially affecting 127 residents who receive meal services (4 nothing by mouth residents, or NPO) out of the facility's total census of 131 residents. Findings include: On 3/5/24 at 10:05 AM, the kitchen's steamer was observed in use and outside of the cooking lines exhaust hood. Further inspection of the area revealed an accumulation of condensation and water droplets on the ceiling above the unit and above the clean equipment storage rack containing cutting boards, plastic containers, and lids. On 3/5/24 at 10:25 AM, upon interview with Certified Dietary Manager, staff A, the surveyor inquired if the steamer had always been in its current location, to which they stated, since I started working here about two years ago. At this time staff A acknowledged the additional moisture in this area. Review of 2017 U.S. Public Health Service Food Code, Chapter 6-304.11…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure equipment used in food service operation was maintained in a safe and sanitary operating condition, resulting in this food equipment not being protected against contamination from sewage or other sources of contamination, potentially affecting all residents consuming food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 3/5/24 at 8:40 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the drain line from the two-compartment sink was observed to not have the required minimum one-inch air gap (an unobstructed vertical space between the end of the drain line and the flood rim of the floor drain). The CDM said the two-compartment sink was used for thawing frozen food and that there was not enough of an air gap. On 3/7/24 at 3:22 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) said someone should have detected that the two-compartment sink was not properly air gapped and alerted the maintenance director right away. The 2013 FDA Food Code was reviewed and revealed the following in Section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, resulting in multiple resident complaints regarding pests, and the presence of live pests (gnats) in multiple areas of the facility. Findings include: On 3/5/24 at 8:50 AM, multiple gnats (too many to count) were observed swarming around the trash can located in the lower-level staff break room. During an interview with Resident #8 on 3/6/24 at 9:23 AM, gnats were observed flying around the resident's head. A resident group meeting was held on 3/6/24 at 10:00 AM with six residents, all of whom were alert, oriented, and able to express themselves without difficulty. A gnat was observed in the dining room during the group meeting. The following resident responses were given to the question, Do you have a concern with gnats in the building? - I have gnats in my room. Gnats are around the garbage, and they fly in your face. - I have seen them in my room and hallway. - I saw a gnat in my room. - I saw gnats in the dining room and in my room. - They're around you when you're eating. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe and functional environment for the facilities census of 131 residents and its staff resulting in an increased potential for harm. Findings include: On 3/6/24 between 10:02 AM, and 11:18 AM, during an environmental tour of the facility the following observations were made: Privacy curtains were observed missing in resident rooms 12A and 11. A heat deflector was observed detached from the radiator in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. Drywall was observed heavily damaged in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], and to the left of bed one in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. A six inch by six inch square was observed missing in the vinyl flooring in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 3/6/24 at 11:20 AM, upon interview with Maintenance Director, staff B, on how work orders are submitted to the maintenance department to be completed they stated, it is all electronic, and we check it three times a day. Once in the morning, around lunchtime, and before we leave for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to hold scheduled care conferences for residents and resident representatives for two residents (R34 and R81) of two residents reviewed for care planning participation. Findings include: R81 On 3/5/24 at 1:16 PM, R81 was observed returning to their room from a shower. Attempts to interview the resident were unsuccessful due to their cognition however, the resident's guardian, Guardian N was asked about their involvement in the resident's care, specifically the development of the president's plan of care. Guardian N explained that they haven't had any meetings regarding the resident's care since they were first admitted in 2021. A review of R81's medical record was reviewed and revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 6/18/21 with diagnoses that included Vascular Dementia, Anxiety, and Cerebral Infarction. Further review revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, and required dependence for toileting and showers. Further review of R81's medical record revealed that one care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor the resident's preference regarding care for one resident (R34) of one reviewed for self-determination. Findings include: On 3/5/24 at 9:04 AM, R34 was observed lying in bed. Attempts to interview with the resident was challenging as they had a communication deficit however, the resident provided their resident representative's phone number who assisted with communication. On 3/5/24 at 10:37 AM, resident representative I was interviewed via phone and explained that the resident has been able to express to them that they would prefer showers instead of bed baths, and that the resident is rarely gotten out of bed, and has been the last 2 years in their room. A review of R34's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted into the facility on 4/9/21 with diagnoses that include Aphasia following Cerebral Infarction, Heart Failure, Morbid Obesity, and Mood Disorder. Further review of the medical record revealed that the resident was cognitively intact and was completely dependent on two staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practices. This citation pertains to Intake MI00135819. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed promptly notify the legal guardian after elopement of a mentally impaired legally incapacitated resident, for one resident (R179) of three residents reviewed for closed record. Findings include: A review of the intake allegations noted, Complainant states on Friday, 04/14/23, the resident was sent on a [local hospital] transport for an appt. (appointment) The resident didn't return to the facility. The guardian, who the complainant works for, wasn't contacted until Saturday morning about his not returning to the facility. A review of R179's medical record revealed, R179 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged [DATE]. A review of R179's form titled, Minimum Data Set (MDS) Item Set Assessment by Patient, dated 2/20/23 noted, R179 with an moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of R179's medical record progress notes revealed, 4/14/2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00135819. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure elopement was reported to the State Agency for one resident (R179) of three residents reviewed for closed record. Findings include: A review of the intake allegations noted, Complainant states on Friday, 04/14/23, the resident was sent on a [local hospital] transport for an appt. (appointment) The resident didn't return to the facility . A review of R179's medical record revealed, R179 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged [DATE]. Further review of R179's medical record progress notes revealed, 4/14/2023 12:44 (12:44 PM) Nurses Note Text: Resident LOA (leave of absence) to [local hospital] via seat walker with 1 attendant. No issues noted upon departure. signed by Unit Manager O. 4/15/2023 06:59 (6:59 AM) Nurses Note Text: Resident went to [R179's] (outside medical) appointment and did not return back to the facility. [Local hospital] was contacted. Daughter called and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00135819. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a thorough and complete investigation was conducted after an elopement for one resident (R179) of three residents reviewed for closed record. Findings include: A review of the intake allegations noted, Complainant states on Friday, 04/14/23, the resident was sent on a [local hospital] transport for an appt. (appointment) The resident didn't return to the facility . A review of R179's medical record revealed, R179 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged [DATE]. Further review of R179's medical record progress notes revealed, 4/14/2023 12:44 (12:44 PM) Nurses Note Text: Resident LOA (leave of absence) to [local hospital] via seat walker with 1 attendant. No issues noted upon departure. signed by Unit Manager O. 4/15/2023 06:59 (6:59 AM) Nurses Note Text: Resident went to [R179's] (outside medical) appointment and did not return back to the facility. [Local hospital] was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for behaviors for two residents (R56 and R6) out six sampled residents reviewed, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs and behavioral health services. Findings include: R56 On 03/06/24 at 08:40 AM, R56 was observed sitting up in bed and eating her breakfast. R56 yelled, My sister is my guardian, and I want to go home. On 03/06/24 at 01:55 PM, R56 was observed walking in her room. R56 had several items on the floor and the bed was covered with items. When asked how are you today, R56 responded Why do you want to know and laughed loudly. On 03/07/24 at 09:08 AM, R56 observed lying bed watching television. R56 asked, Do I have an appointment today. Bye. A review of the medical record revealed that R56 admitted into the facility on 8/30/23 with the following diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, violent behavior, paranoid personality disorder, and delusion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an update for a preadmission screening (PAS) and resident review (ARR) /Hospital Exempted Discharge for a Level II evaluation was completed for one (R56) of three residents reviewed for PASARR, resulting in the potential for unmet mental health services. Findings include: A review of the medical record revealed a Preadmission Screening with a hospital exemption dated on 8/30/23. There was no change in condition for hospital discharge within 30 days and the PASSAR should have been updated after thirty days. There was no additional PASARR forms nor was a Level II screening requested due to R56 having several diagnoses of mental illness. A review of the medical record revealed that R56 admitted into the facility on 8/30/23 with the following diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, violent behavior, paranoid personality disorder, and delusion disorders. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] was completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake: MI00135805 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care for one resident (R47) out of three reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Findings Include: On 3/5/2024 at 9:30 AM, R47 was observed laying in bed. R47 fingernails were long with black debris underneath. R47 was noted to have a contracture of the left hand and their fingernails were digging into their hand. R47 was interviewed regarding their nails. R47 stated that they wanted their nails cut and had informed the Unit Manager that they wanted a particular certified nursing assistant (CNA) to cut them. R47 stated that they also reached out to the CNA that they wanted to cut their nails. On 3/6/2024 at 9:25 AM, R47 nails were still noted to be long with black debris underneath them. R47 stated that they were still waiting to get them cut and that they had told the Unit Manager again. On 3/6/2024 at 12:11 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to come down and look at R47's nails. The DON asked R47 if they wanted their nails cut and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00137493. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide ancillary services related to a hearing impairment for one resident (R6) of one reviewed for hearing services. Findings include: On 3/05/24 at 12:44 PM, R6 was interviewed regarding their stay at the facility. During interview R6 was unable to hear the question which required the interview to be closer to R6's ear and at a louder volume. R6 was asked about their hearing aides. R6 was observed to pull a tissue out of their pocket and stated, Here they are, they don't work. I have lost the case for them, so I keep them in my pocket like this. On 3/06/24 at 9:31 AM, R6 was observed lying in bed asleep. A review of R6's care plan noted, Focus: I have a communication problem r/t (relate to) being HOH (hard of hearing). Date Initiated: 01/05/2022. Goal: I will be able to make basic needs known on a daily basis through the review date. Date Initiated: 01/05/2022. Interventions: Be conscious of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely podiatry services for one resident (R16) of one reviewed for foot care. Findings include: On 3/5/24 at 12:24 PM, R16 was asked about their care in the facility, and explained that they wanted to be seen by the foot doctor to have their toenails cut, as they hurt when they rub against their socks and shoes. A review if R16's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 7/19/22 with diagnoses that included Diabetes, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Peripheral Vascular Disease. Further review revealed that the resident has a moderate impaired cognition, and is dependent on staff for bathing, bed mobility and toilet use. Further review of the medical record revealed that the resident had not been seen for podiatry services since their admission. On 3/6/24 at 1:02 PM, surveyor observed R16's feet with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) P. R16's toenails were observed as elongated and approximately a half an inch in length. Upon observation, CNA P response was woah. R16…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00138528. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate neurological assessments were completed after an unwitnessed fall for one resident (#479) out of five residents reviewed for falls, resulting in the potential delay to provide resident care needs following an unwitnessed fall. Finding include: It was reported to the State Agency that staff failed to provide timely medical evaluation. A review of the clinical record revealed R479 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. R479's diagnoses included seizure disorder, chronic drug abuse, peripheral neuropathy, panic disorder, and transient cerebral ischemic attack. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented moderate cognitive impairment, extensive one-person physical assistance for bed mobility, and extensive two-person physical assistance for transfers. On 3/6/24 at 3:35 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON), R479's Incident Note of 7/4/23 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practices. Deficient practice #1. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently assess and implement nutrition interventions for one resident (R63) of seven residents reviewed for maintenance or improvement in nutritional status, resulting in a delay in the identification of continued significant weight loss and the potential for further decline in nutritional status. Findings include: On 3/5/24 at 11:10 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident #63 (R63) was observed asleep and lying in bed. R63 appeared very thin in appearance. A review of the clinical record for R63 documented an admission date of 2/2/22 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, cirrhosis of liver, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented severe cognitive impairment. A review of R63's care plans documented in part the following: Focus: I am at nutritional risk related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label a bag of Intravenous (IV) fluids, an Intravenous (IV) line, and IV dressing for one resident (R52) out of six reviewed for IV fluids. Findings Include: On 3/5/2024 at 9:21 AM, an interview was conducted with R52. R52 stated that they had been receiving fluids for the last day or so. R52 was observed to be receiving fluids. R52 stated that IV was infusing on the side of their stomach. On 3/5/2024 at 9:24 AM, certified nursing assistant (CNA) G turned R52 over and no date was observed on the bag of fluids, IV line, and/or the dressing at the insertion site. A review of the medical record revealed that R52 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, Sepsis and Urinary Tract Infection. A review of Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental status score of 15/15 indicating an intact cognition. R52 also required assistance with bed mobility and transfers. On 3/7/2024 at 9:38 AM, an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practice statements. Deficient Practice Statement number one. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly monitor an antipsychotic (AP) medication for one resident (R123) out of three reviewed for antipsychotic use. Findings Include: A review of the medical record revealed that R123 admitted into the facility on 1/15/2024 with the following diagnoses, Repeated Falls and Metabolic Encephalopathy. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview Mental status score of 5/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R123 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfer. Further review of the physician orders revealed that R123 was currently prescribed Zyprexa (AP) two times a day for Dementia. Further review of the medical record revealed no Abnormal Involuntary Movement (AIMS) testing or psychiatric notes. On 3/6/2024 at 12:38 PM, an interview was conducted with Social Worker (SW) D. SW D stated that R123 has not been seen by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store medication for two residents (R47 and R94) out of two reviewed for medication storage. Findings Include: On 3/5/2024 at 1:17 PM, R47 was observed in their room. R47 was noted to be laying in bed. A nebulizer machine was observed in the corner, unplugged. Under the television stand, 4 vials of albuterol inhalation liquid were observed sitting on a shelf. A review of the medical record revealed that R47 admitted into the facility on 9/25/2021 with the following diagnoses, Hemiplegia and Contracture, Left Hand. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13/15 indicating an intact cognition. R47 was also dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers. A review of the physician orders revealed the following, Order: Albuterol Sulfate Nebulization Solution 0.63 milligrams (MG)/3 milliter (ML). Directions: 1 vial inhale orally via nebulizer every 6 hours as needed for SOB AND 1 vial inhale orally via nebulizer every 6 hours for SOB . Status:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: MI00135865 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing standards of practice for medication administration documentation were followed for three residents (#70, #74, #121) of three residents reviewed for maintenance of medical records, resulting in the potential for medication errors and compromise and complications in health. Findings include: A resident group meeting was held on 3/6/24 at 10:00 AM with six residents, all of whom were alert, oriented, and able to express themselves without difficulty. Resident #74 (R74) and Resident #121 (R121) indicated the following when queried if staff were available to assist them when needed: R74 verbalized a concern about getting medications in a timely manner. R121 said their pain meds were not provided for two days, multiple times. During an interview on 3/7/24 at 11:44 AM, R74 said they would be in pain when medications are late or not received. During an interview on 3/7/24 at 11:46 AM, R121 stated, I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: MI00133917. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a fall for one resident (R901) of one reviewed for notification of changes, resulting in the resident's representative being unaware of the fall, and a delay in the opportunity to participate in medical decisions regarding care and treatment. Findings include: A review of MI00133917 revealed the following, On December 7th I was called regarding a fall [R901] had that resulted in no injury. The nurse mentioned that it was nothing like the fall [R901] had 2 days prior that had split [their] eyebrow open. I was shocked because they had never called to report this injury to me. When I arrived to check on [R901] on December 8th I observed a severe wound on [their] eyebrow and side of [their] eye. I questioned why I was never called about this injury as it is required by state law and they told me that it was a new nurse who was unaware of the requirement to report a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ORCHARDS MICHIGAN — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LONG, MICHELEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/01/2021
WOODWARD, BRANDONIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/01/2021

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.1M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 58%Medicare 7%Other / private 36%

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$310per resident / day
operating cost
$9,425per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$313per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235480. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next