The Orchards at Warren
12250 East 12 Mile Road, Warren, MI 48093 · For profit - Corporation · 134 certified beds · (586) 751-6200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.1% | 10.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.3% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.4% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.9% | 12.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.0% | 19.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.2% | 95.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.3% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.1% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.5% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.8% | 1.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 54.3% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.9% | 24.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.4% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.39 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.70 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
37.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 113 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 39.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 37.5%CMS range 29.0–47.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 8.1–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 39.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 28.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 63.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 93.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 88.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.9%CMS range 5.2–13.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.95 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 134 beds and averages 122.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00138416. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent development of a pressure sore for one resident (R68) of three reviewed for pressure sore, resulting in the development and or worsening of an unstageable pressure sore to the right medial heel. Findings include: On 07/31/23 at 11:33 AM, a wound was observed with the family of R68. The wound was located on the medial aspect of the right heel. The tissue over the wound appeared moist, mostly gray with areas of black. This was non viable tissue slough and eschar. The dressing appeared with a brown and black drainage. The wound was more oval than circular and around a half dollar in size. The family members reported they had brought the wound to the attention of the facility and the facility had wrapped it in dry gauze. The family and R68 were concerned for infection. The family provided a picture of the wound when first discovered. The wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately monitor and timely address a significant weight loss for one sampled resident (R74) of one resident reviewed for nutrition resulting in, undetected significant weight loss, and the potential for further weight loss and decline in nutritional status. Findings include: On 7/31/23 at 2:20 PM, R74 was observed in bed asleep, appearing small in stature. Attempts to arouse R74 were made to no avail. A review of R74's medical record revealed that the resident was initially admitted into the facility on 5/20/23, hospitalized from [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. R74's diagnoses include Cerebral Infarction, Dysphagia, Cognitive Communication Disorder, and Legal Blindness. Further review of the medical record revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated for 6/7/23 revealing a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14/15 indicating an intact cognition. Further review revealed that R74 required for extensive assistance for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2984550.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document and/or complete wound care for one resident (R801) out of three reviewed for wound care. Findings include: A review of the medical record revealed R801 was admitted into the facility on 7/7/2025 with the following diagnoses, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Stage 3 (full thickness skin loss and exposure of the fatty tissue beneath) and Pressure Ulcer of Left Hip, Stage 3. Further review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15, indicating an impaired cognition. R801 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers.Further review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed the following, Cleanse coccyx (buttocks) with NS (Normal Saline), apply medihoney gel (draws moisture from wound to promote healing), and a dry dressing. Every day shift (7AM -3:30PM). Start date:7/9/2025.Additional review of the July…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2729557.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for one resident (R901) from a total of three residents reviewed for supervision. Findings Include: Review of a complaint called into the State Agency revealed, Complainant states a male resident (R901) escaped from the facility two weeks ago and was found at the bus stop. Review of the clinical record revealed R901 was admitted into the facility on 4/4/2025 with the following diagnoses: Vascular Dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety. The Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated resident was independent with ambulation and activities of daily living, requiring assistance of one for showering and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) revealed a score of 15/15, indicating intact cognition. A review of the clinical record revealed R901 verbalized on 9/19/25 to staff they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2717353.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely provide incontinence care or repositioning for three residents (R902, R905, and R906) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living care (ADL). Findings include:R902On 01/21/26 at 7:17 AM and 8:02 AM, R902 was observed to be supine in bed, dressed in a hospital style gown, the head of bed up slightly, a mat was on the floor at the right side of the bed, a low air loss mattress unit was at the foot of the bed, the bed was in a lowered position, R902 had a pillow on the right side under the arm, heel boots on, the call light was clipped to the side of the mattress at the head of the bed, the tray table was at the foot of the bed. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A reported there were two or three aides on the unit.At 8:19 AM, R902 was supine in bed with the head of the bed up around 45-60 degrees. The breakfast tray was on the tray table over the lap of R902 and the mat was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2718756.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure essential equipment was readily for use, for one sampled resident (R904) of three reviewed for patient care equipment. Findings include:A review of an Intake revealed, AED (Automated external defibrillator) pads not on crash cart. The Complainant reported on 1/15/26 on [NAME] unit R904 had a code blue and when the staff went to use the unit's AED, staff had to go and get another AED from another unit due to the closest AED not having pads. A review of R904's medical record noted R904 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. R904's medical record documented on 1/15/26 after a code and 911 were called, the resident was transferred to the local hospital. A review of R904's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment noted R904 with intact cognition and required assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living. A review of R904's advanced directive was noted as full…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program by eliminating harborage conditions. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors. Findings include:On 12/1/25 at 9:10 AM during an observation of the kitchen, the stainless-steel table holding the coffee maker was observed with a built-in drainage well. The drainage pipe under the table was observed to be propped up by a cardboard box. The box was water damaged, and there were numerous gnats observed on the box and drainage pipe. When queried, Dietary Manager K stated the box was being used to support the pipe. No explanation was provided for why the water damaged cardboard had not been discarded or the observed gnats.According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 6-501.111 Controlling Pests. The PREMISES shall be maintained free of insects, rodents, and other pests. The presence of insects, rodents, and other pests shall be controlled to eliminate their presence on the PREMISES by: (A)Routinely inspecting incoming shipments of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-03 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct quarterly care conferences for five residents (R1, R8, R9, R79, R109) of five reviewed for care conference participation. Findings include: R1 A review of the record for R1 revealed R1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Bipolar Disorder, Epilepsy and Stroke. A review of the active care plan documented multiple Focus entries which included, incontinent of bowel and bladder related to immobility, I am on a restorative nursing program, I am dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs, and I have an ADL (activities of daily living) deficit requiring assistance. A review of the documented care conferences in the electronic medical record revealed dates for 10/21/25 and 05/29/25. Additional documentation of quarterly care conferences held was requested but not received prior to survey exit. R8 A review of the record for R8 revealed R8 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a home-like environment for two of two residents (R108 and R11), and two (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) of 24 resident rooms reviewed for home-like environment. Findings include: R108 On 12/1/25 at 9:23 AM, R108's bathroom door in their room was observed to have a square broken area in the wood of the door approximately a third of the way from the top of the door. R108 was asked about the damage to the door and indicated that they did not like it and that it bothered them. On 12/2/25 and 12/3/25 the bathroom door in R108's room was observed to remain damaged. On 12/3/25 at 3:49 PM, Director of Maintenance (DM) E was interviewed and asked about the damaged bathroom door in R108's room. DM E stated, We don't inspect the rooms. DM E indicated that something should be put into TELs (Electronic maintenance request system) so we can address it. A review of R108's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R108 was most recently admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an appropriate size bed for one (R108) resident of one reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include:On 12/1/25 at 10:19 AM, R108 was observed lying perpendicular across their bed with their legs slightly bent and their feet positioned firmly against the footboard. The right side of R108's body was positioned close to the side of the bed nearest to the door of their room. R108 stated, This bed is uncomfortable, I feel like I'm going to fall off the bed. Upon further questioning R108 indicated that they had mentioned to different staff on multiple occasions that they would like a larger bed. R108 was asked if they had completed a facility grievance form regarding their bed. R108 stated, No one ever told me that I needed to do that. R108 stated, I'm tall and need a larger bed. While in the resident's room it was observed that their call light was on the floor underneath the left side of their bed. On 12/1/25 at 2:09 PM, R108…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based in interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician regarding abnormal laboratory (lab) results (blood glucose level of 34 - normal range for a blood glucose level per the lab report was 82-115 mg/dl-milligrams per deciliter) for one resident (R1) of three whose labs were reviewed. Findings include: A review of the lab results dated 07/28/25 and reported 07/28/25 at 9:06 PM revealed R1 had a critical blood glucose level of 34. A review of the record for R1 revealed R1 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Bipolar Disorder, Epilepsy and Stroke. A review of the active care plan documented I am dependent upon tube feeding, I am NPO (noting by mouth), I have the potential for fluid imbalance, I have an ADL (activities of daily living) deficit requiring assistance, and I have altered cardiovascular status related to Hypertension (high blood pressure), Hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). A review of the progress notes revealed no documentation the physician was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide podiatry services for one resident (R84) out of two reviewed for foot care. Findings include:On 12/01/2025 at 9:30 AM, an interview was conducted with R84. R84 stated they had been asking to see the podiatrist for months now and had yet to see them. R84 reported they have long toenails and that they hurt.A review of the medical record revealed R84 admitted into the facility on 5/9/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, Parkinson's Disease and Muscle Weakness. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14/15 indicating an intact cognition. R84 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers.A request for R84's most recent podiatry note was requested and not received by the end of survey.On 12/2/2025 at 11:15 AM, an observation of R84's toenails were completed with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A. CNA A reported they had given R84 a shower the day prior and marked on the shower sheet that R84 needed their toenails cut. R84's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document the physician's order, consent for use, risk versus benefits, attempted alternatives, and consistently monitor for the use of side rails for two residents (R50 and R89) of two residents reviewed for side rails. Findings include: R50 On 12/1/25 at 12:00 PM, R50 was observed sitting in their wheelchair. An observation of the resident's bed revealed two black side rails approximately 32 inches in length. R50 was asked about the rails and explained they like them there because they make them feel safe. A review of R50's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include Cerebral Infarction, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, and Heart Failure. Further review revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required 2-person assist for bed mobility, per their care plan. Further review of the care plan did not address the resident's side rails, and there were no physician orders in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a prescribed medication (lacosamide-anticonvulsant medication) was available for administration for one resident (R1) of 24 whose medications were reviewed. Findings Include:A review of the record for R1 revealed R1 had an original admission date of 06/06/19 with a readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Seizures, Epilepsy, and Stroke. A review of the active care plan documented, I have a seizure disorder related to Disease process Seizure, Date Initiated: 09/19/2022. Give me my medications as ordered. Observe me for effectiveness and side effects. Date Initiated: 09/19/2022.A review of the medication orders revealed, Lacosamide oral solution 100 mg (milligrams)/ 10 ml (milliliters) Give 20 ml two times a day related to Generalized Idiopathic Epilepsy and Epileptic Syndrome . A review of the December 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the Lacosamide was not documented as given twice daily on 12/01, 12/02, with the morning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an oral surgeon consultation was completed timely for one resident (R8) of three whose ancillary services were reviewed. Findings include: On 12/01/2025 at 10:18 AM, R8 was observed to be in their room lying in bed dressed in a hospital style gown. R8 was asked about mouth care and when asked if it was completed daily R8 showed their teeth and shook their head No. The middle upper teeth were missing or appeared broken. The front teeth on the lower jaw were more aligned but with a build of white debris in the spaces between the teeth. R8 shook their head yes when asked if they would like their teeth brushed more often. R8 was observed to have a hand contracture on the left and when asked if they could move their arms lifted them a few inches off the bed and was not able to move beyond that position. R8 reported they would allow staff to brush their teeth. R8 was receiving tube feeding and reported they also received a tray of food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to don appropriate personal protection equipment (PPE) when providing care for two residents (R1 and R8) of three observed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - use of gloves and gowns for high-contact care activities). Findings include: On 12/02/2025 at 9:27 AM, a medication administration was observed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) I for R1. The room of R1 had a sign on the door which indicated R1 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). LPN I entered the room and donned a pair of gloves. A gown was not worn. LPN I administered the medications separately, via a PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube - tube inserted externally into the stomach for liquid nutrition). On 12/03/2025 at 8:10 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) J was observed to enter the room of R8 with a clear plastic bag of wash towels. CNA J then exited the room. CNA J re-entered the room of R8 and closed the door. The sign on the door indicated both residents residing in the room were on EBP. R8 was observed to have tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake: MI00149450. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a change in condition for one resident (R901) of one resident reviewed for a change in condition. Findings include: On 1/21/25 at 9:32 AM, Confidential Family Member A was interviewed regarding R901, and explained they were unaware that R901 was showing any signs of a change in condition until another family member went to visit the resident on 1/9/25, and noticed a change in their abilities. Family Member A explained they requested the resident be transferred to the hospital on that day, and was later informed R901's physician had ordered tests to be completed days before the transfer, but wasn't informed of this, as they would have liked to be a part of the decision-making regarding the care of their loved one. A review of R901's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 2/5/24 with diagnoses that included Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Diabetes, Dementia, and Heart Failure. Further review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake M100147854. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive nutritional assessment in a timely manner for one (R801) of three residents reviewed who were admitted with nutrional at-risk indicators. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R801 revealed an admission date of 10/15/24 with diagnoses including Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Diabetes Mellitus, and Dementia. A transfer order from the hospital indicated the resident required a pureed diet. The resident's weights were documented on 10/15/24 (140 pounds) and 11/02/24 (131.7 pounds). R801's Care Plan indicated they required Extensive Assistance for eating. The Nurse Practitioner (NP) progress note dated 10/21/24 stated decreased oral intake, monitor for now. The Change of Condition note dated 11/08/24 indicated decreased appetite. Further review revealed no comprehensive nutritional assessment was completed by the Registered Dietician (RD). On 11/08/24 at 12:06 PM, RD A was interviewed by phone. RD A reviewed R801's record and confirmed they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food in a palatable manner and at the preferred temperature for one resident (R47) and ten confidential group residents of thirteen reviewed for food palatability, resulting in dissatisfaction during meals. Findings include: On 9/17/24 at 9:25 AM, R47 was met in their room for observation and interview. R47's breakfast was observed to consist of two biscuits, two pancakes, cereal, a small carton of milk, syrup and butter. The only protean observed with R47's breakfast was the carton of milk. R47 was interviewed about the food served to them at the facility and stated, The food is [swear word]. On 9/18/24 at 8:38 AM, a followup visit was conducted with R47 and they were asked how their breakfast was. R47 stated, It tasted like garbage, I had two hard boiled eggs, toast, and cereal. A review of R47's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R47 was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake: MI00146189 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program by eliminating harborage conditions in the kitchen. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: 09/17/24 at 9:15 AM, there was standing, stagnant, slimy water observed on the floor, in the corner underneath the garbage grinder at the 3 compartment sink. In addition, there were cobwebs and numerous gnats observed in the same area. When queried, Dietary Manager (DM) A stated that the pipe for the garbage grinder was small and sometimes over-flows. DM A did not provide an explanation for why the standing water in the kitchen was not cleaned up, in order to prevent a breeding ground for gnats. On 9/17/24 at 9:20 AM, there was standing water on the floor between the coffee maker and the juice dispenser. There were gnats observed flying about in the same area. When queried, DM A was unsure where the water was coming from. Review of the pest control service reports for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were not left at the bedside for four residents (R22, R44, R63 and R71) of four residents reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: R71 On 9/16/24 at 8:40 AM, R71 was observed lying in bed. An inhaler was observed lying on their bedside table. A review of R71's medical record revealed the resident was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Alcohol Abuse, and Adjustment Disorder. Further review revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, and required limited assistance with Activities of Daily Living. On 9/17/24 at 12:55 PM, R71 was observed lying in bed awake, inhaler located on their bedside table. On 9/19/24 at 9:19 AM, R71 was observed lying in bed, inhaler lying on their bedside table. R71 was asked about the inhaler, and explained it's their Albuterol recuse inhaler. R71 was asked when was the last time they used it and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's request to be sent out for a higher level of care for one resident (R33) of one reviewed for self-determination. Findings include: On 9/18/24 at 8:47 AM, R33 was observed lying in bed, and asked to speak to the surveyor. R33 explained that their pain management has not been managed well, specifically with them not receiving their prescribed as needed medications timely. R33 further explained that they have a history of kidney stones, and felt as though they had one last week Wednesday, which was causing excruciating pain. R33 explained that as a result, they asked to speak to the Director of Nursing and their physician as they wanted to be transferred to the hospital. R33 further explained that they never spoke to the DON or the physician, but was told that the nurse spoke to the physician who did not order a transfer to the hospital, and that if they chose to transfer on their own they would have to sign themselves out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for medication administration when an extended-release medication was crushed for one Resident (R62) of six residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: On 9/18/24 at approximately 9:30 a.m., R62 was observed in their bed with fisted hands, wearing a hospital gown, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) L present. When LPN L was leaving the room, R62 was heard to say they wanted their medications crushed. On 9/18/24 at approximately 9:32 a.m., LPN L started to crush R62's medications. LPN L was asked if R62 should have had their medications crushed, as this was not observed in the physician's orders. LPN L reported R62 sometimes liked their medications crushed and continued to crush R62's medications as follows: -Colace Oral Capsule, 100 mg (milligram). Give 1 capsule two times a day for constipation. -Loratadine Oral Tablet. 10 mg. Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an assistive communication device for one resident (R35) of five reviewed for communication, resulting in limited communication between R35 and staff. Findings include: On 9/17/24 at 10:30 AM, R35 was met in their room for observation and interview. R35 was unable to answer any questions asked. R35 gave a thumbs up, when asked if they were okay. On 9/18/24 at 9:03 AM, R35's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B was interviewed and asked about how they communicated with R35. CNA B stated, [R35] gestures and gives a thumbs up. CNA B was asked if R35 had a communication board to assist with communication with staff. CNA B stated, No, not that I'm aware of. CNA B indicated it would be helpful for R35 to have a communication board. A review of R35's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R35 was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Ceberal infraction (stroke) and Type 2 diabetes. R35's most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure broken glasses were addressed for one resident (R109) out of one resident reviewed for vision. Findings include: On 9/18/24 at 10:24 AM, R109 was observed in their room wearing glasses which were observed to be missing a section of the frame and the entire lens on the right side. The lens on the left side was observed to be dirty with many specks of unknown particles covering it and smeared with a greasy appearing substance. R109 was asked how long their glasses had been broken. R109 explained they had been broken for quite a while. R109 was asked if they were able to see. R109 stated, I can see but not very well. R109 was asked if the facility was helping them get new glasses. R109 stated no. they said I had to get them myself. A review of R109's medical record revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: Other sequelae of cerebral Infarction; Ataxia following Cerebral Infarction. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a splinting program for one (R68) of five residents reviewed. Findings include: On 09/17/24 at 09:56 AM, R68 was asked about a hand splint that was observed laying on the heat register in their room. R68 reported the splint was for their left hand and stated They never put it on anymore. Review of the facility record for R68 revealed an admission date of 12/17/20 with diagnoses including Cerebral Infarction with Left Hemiplegia and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. The record also indicated R68 required total assistance for dressing tasks. On 09/17/24 at 03:27 PM, R68 was observed laying in bed. The hand splint was observed laying on the heat register. Additional review of R68's record revealed the most recent Occupational Therapy (OT) evaluation dated 06/06/24 and Discharge summary dated [DATE] made no reference to a left hand splint or related interventions. An OT evaluation dated 06/01/21 did reference the left hand splint and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain a physician order for oxygen for one resident (R76) out of two residents reviewed for oxygen. Findings include: On 9/17/24 at 10:15 AM, 9/17/24 at 11:43 AM, 9/17/24 at 1:34 PM, 9/17/24 at 3:36 PM, 09/17/24 04:04, 9/18/24 at 8:46 AM, 9/18/24 at 11:56 AM, and 9/18/24 at 1:42 PM, R76 was observed lying in bed wearing oxygen at four liters per minute via nasal cannula. A review of R76's medical record revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: Cerebral Infarction due to Embolism of Right Cerebellar Artery; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia. A review of R76's Brief Interview for Mental status revealed a score of 15 indicating intact cognition. A review of R76's care plan revealed the following: I have altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing in my respiratory status r/t (related to) COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) Acute respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00140309. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure timely incontinence care was provided to a dependent resident (R902) of three reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), resulting in and the potential for the resident in a soiled brief for an extended period of time and or skin irritation. Findings include: On 01/17/24 at 7:39 AM, R902 was observed out in the hallway near the common area on the [NAME] unit. R902 was dressed and seated in a wheelchair. On 01/17/24 at 8:45 AM., 9:45 AM, 11:25 AM, 1:30 PM and at 3:20 PM, R902 was observed sitting up in wheelchair appropriately dressed at a table in the dining room. There was a grey and white toy cat placed on the table in front of R902 that occupied their attention. R902 was not interviewable due to their cognitive ability. At 1:30 PM, R902 was observed in the same spot and had recently finished eating as evident by the food crumbs on their clothing. On 01/17/24 at 8:45 AM., 9:45 AM.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00133113. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate and/or sufficient staff were available to meet the needs of the residents for 19 residents (R4, R24, R28, R46, R57, R60, R66, R78, R81, R87, R93, R103, R106, R11, R331, R39, R112, R86) of 32 reviewed resulting in unmet care needs. Findings include: R4 A review of the clinical record for R4 revealed R4 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included High Blood Pressure, Depression, Anxiety and Insomnia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented moderately impaired cognition and the need for supervison for most Activities of Daily Living. A review of the July 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed on 07/30/23 the evening/night doses of Trazodone (for sleep) and Norco (for pain control) were not documented as given. The assessments for pain, anti-depressant side effects, and the vital signs were also not documented as done. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: There was a dusty box fan blowing in the direction of the steam table during breakfast service. When queried about the dusty fan, Culinary Director A stated I just bought those. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 3-307.11 Miscellaneous Sources of Contamination, FOOD shall be protected from contamination that may result from a factor or source not specified under Subparts 3-301 - 3-306. There were 2 clean pitchers on drying rack, sitting upright with the lids on, observed with moisture inside with water pooling at the bottom of the pitchers. When queried, Culinary Director A confirmed the pitchers should be air dried in an inverted position. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 4-903.11 Equipment, Utensils, Linens, and Single-Service and Single-Use Articles, (B) Clean equipment and utensils shall be stored as specified under (A) of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure biologicals were dated when opened in four medication carts resulting in the potential for used of expired medication and decreased efficacy of medications. Findings include: On 08/01/23 at 8:55 AM, a check of the [NAME] one medication cart revealed a Trelegy Ellipta inhaler had not been dated when opened. The patient care information from the manufacturer's web site revealed, Safely throw away Trelegy Ellipta in the trash 6 weeks after you open the tray or when the counter reads 0, whichever comes first. Write the date you open the tray on the label on the inhaler . On 08/01/23 at 9:25 AM, a check of the [NAME] two medication cart revealed one insulin without a date when opened. On 08/01/23 at 2:25 PM, a chcek of the Lavender High medication cart revealed a Combivent inhaler that was undated when opened the manufacuter's insert indicated it was good for three months post after opening. On 08/02/23 at 8:07 AM, a check of the Lavender medication room revealed the tuberculin vial was not dated on vial when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to update a care plan following a change in code status for one resident (R64) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives, resulting the incorrect code status as an intervention. Findings include: A review of R64's medical record noted, progress note, [DATE] 13:07 Social service Quarterly Review: Social worker met with resident in a common area for [R64's] quarterly review. Resident was sitting in [R64's] wheelchair alert . Resident has a guardian who is responsible for [R64's] care decisions and requested for resident to remain a full code and long-term care . Care plan: Focus: CODE STATUS: My Guardian has reviewed my advanced directives with the social worker/physician and wishes for me to receive CPR (full code). My Guardian has consented for all other physician recommended medical or surgical treatments. Goal: My guardians wishes will be honored through the next review date. Interventions: Communicate any change of condition with me and my…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes MI00132448, MI00137217, and MI00137909. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care and/or bathing assistance for three resident (R46, R86, R101) of 24 residents reviewed for Activites of Daily Living (ADL) care resulting in resident feelings of poor hygiene, dissatisfaction with care and potential for compromised skin integrity. Findings include: R86 Review of the facility record for R86 revealed an admission date of 04/27/23 with diagnoses that included Acute Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis, Thrombocytopenia and Hematuria. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R86 required maximum assistance for bathing. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicated intact cognition. On 07/31/23 at 8:44 AM, R86 reported I haven't had a shower in a week or two. I get a bed bath sometimes but not twice a week. Review of the R86's electronic medical record TASK completion checklist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake MI00132448. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, resulting in the potential for inadequate coordination of care and negative clinical outcomes, affecting all residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: On 8/2/23 at 2:55 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was asked about Registered Nurse (RN) coverage and stated, We have two, but had three until a couple of weeks ago. A review of staffing for Monday July 31st and Wednesday August 2nd, revealed, the facility did not have an RN that worked other than the Director of Nursing (DON). On 8/02/23 at 3:06 PM, the NHA was asked if the facility had any other RN's that was not the DON in the building that was a RN during the dates of 7/31/23 and 8/2/23. The NHA reported, No.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide meals of a palatable taste and temperature for two (R86 and R33) of six residents reviewed for food satisfaction and nine of nine anonymous group members, resulting in resident dissatisfaction with the meal experience. Findings include: On 07/31/23 at 8:44 AM, R86 reported The food is lousy, it just isn't good and it's not hot enough. Review of the facility record for R86 revealed an admission date of 04/27/23 with diagnoses that included Acute Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis, Thrombocytopenia and Hematuria. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R86 required set up assistance for meals. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicated intact cognition. On 08/01/23 at 9:11 AM, R86 reported their breakfast was lousy, I think it was something like biscuits and gravy, I'm not sure, but it was cold whatever it was. On 08/01/23 at 9:36 AM, review of Resident Council meeting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00132448. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed, a glucometer (device used to check blood sugar levels), oxygen tubing, and tube feeding pole were cleaned after patient care was completed resulting on the potential for the spread of infection. Findings include: On 8/01/23 at 12:55 PM, staff were observed to assist two residents with feeding. At one point during the meal assistance the two staff members switched residents and were not observed to complete hand hygine. On 08/02/23 at 9:10 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse D was observed to prepare medication for room [ROOM NUMBER]. LPN D administered the medication to the resident and exited the room. LPN D then removed the glucometer from the medication cart and entered the room next door. A blood sugar check was completed and LPN D returned to the medication cart and placed the glucometer in the drawer. LPN D then began to prepare the next resident's medication.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ORCHARDS MICHIGAN — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WARREN SNF HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/01/2022 |
| MI OPCO HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2022 |
| GUTMAN, ISAAC | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2022 |
| HOFFMAN, ALEXANDER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2022 |
| KORNFELD, ROBERT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2022 |
| TAUB, JACOB | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2022 |
| BEAUPRE, JUDITH | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 06/01/2022 |
| LEE, MYRNA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 06/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235509. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.