The Orchards at Canterbury on the Lake
5601 Hatchery Road, Waterford, MI 48329 · For profit - Corporation · 128 certified beds · (248) 674-9292 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (73) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $45,461 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-07)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.4% | 10.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.9% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.1% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.6% | 3.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.2% | 12.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.4% | 19.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 72.9% | 95.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.4% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.5% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.7% | 14.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 42.7% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.3% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.5% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.03 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.10 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 282 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 48.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 119 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 48% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.2%CMS range 52.4–62.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 8.8–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 48.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 5.2–12.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.86 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 107.8 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
73 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 60 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number MI001227212. This citation has two deficient practice statements (DPS). DPS #1 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a new skin impairment and implement treatments in a timely manner and according to physician's orders for two (R55 and R49) of four reviewed for non-pressure skin impairments, resulting in a wound to R55's arm becoming infected with delayed healing. Findings include: R55 On 7/29/25 at 10:45 AM, R55 was observed in bed. A dressing dated 7/29/25 was observed on R55's right forearm. When queried about what happened to his arm, R55 stated, She burnt it. R55 appeared fully able to understand the questions being asked but had trouble finding words and explained that sometimes the words he wants to say, do not come out correctly or he could not say the word (aphasia). R55 explained the wound on his arm has been present for a long time and was not healing. On 7/30/25 at approximately 1:00 PM, R55 was observed eating lunch.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #'s MI00147613 and MI00147486. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical and verbal abuse by Certified Nursing Assistant C (CNA C) for one resident (R901) of two residents reviewed for abuse/neglect/mistreatment, resulting in R901 being in pain from being punched, kicked and the target of derogatory language. Findings include: On 10/28/24 a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) was reviewed that alleged R901 was physically and verbally abused by CNA C on 10/12/24. On 10/28/24 at approximately 8:57 a.m., during a conversation with the facility Administrator (who is also the abuse coordinator), the Administrator was queried pertaining to the allegation of physical and verbal abuse perpetrated by CNA C against R901 on 10/12/24 and the Administrator indicated that it did happen and was witnessed by Nurse D. The Administrator indicated the following: The event occurred on Saturday October 12th…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake#: MI00138928 Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to (1) consistently monitor the change in condition for a Resident (R905) with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF - inability of the heart to pump blood efficiently, causing shortness of breath, fatigue, leg and foot swelling, and weakness) and transfer to hospital per advance directives and (2) failed to communicate/coordinate and follow up on the orders by the specialist (cardiologist) timely, resulting in a 9.4 lb.(pound) weight gain (in 4 days), difficulty breathing, discomfort, and death in the facility. Findings include: R905 R905 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after hospitalization. R905 was living at home with their family prior to hospitalization. R905's was not returning to the community, and they were staying as a long-term resident in the facility. R905 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with a heart attack and was discharged to the facility on [DATE]. R905's other admitting diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2698293Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper positioning and to maintain proper bed mobility for one (R701) of two residents reviewed for accidents resulting in R701 falling out of bed during activity of daily living [ADL] care and being transferred to the hospital. Findings include:A complaint was filed with the State Agency [SA] that alleged in part, .Monday morning, 12-15-2025, [R701] called. and stated that he had soiled himself and couldn't any [sic] help. Minutes later he called. and stated that he was on the floor, hurt his right foot and that the aide was just standing there. the aide lowered the bed and told him he could crawl up into bed himself, which he did. he had rolled out of the bed and fell on the floor while the aide was providing care. He stated that he told her that he was falling and she did nothing.Review of the closed record revealed R701 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: nondisplaced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Complaint #2649498Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's responsible party of a change of condition after a fall and a subsequent emergent transfer to the hospital for one (R801) of one resident reviewed for notification of changes. Findings include:A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed an allegation that R801 fell in the early morning of [DATE] and was taken to the local hospital via ambulance. R801's responsible party alleged they were unaware of the fall or hospital transfer until 3:45 PM when the emergency room (ER) physician contacted them to say R801 sustained a Dense fracture of the C-2 Vertebrae.On [DATE], an onsite investigation was conducted.A review of R801's clinical record revealed R801 was admitted into the facility on [DATE], discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and [DATE], and expired in the facility on [DATE]. R801's diagnoses included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Alzheimer's Disease,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2643927Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were available to administer per the Physician's orders for two residents (R901 and R902) of two residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include:On 10/21/25 a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed which alleged R901 did not have their medication available for administration upon being admitted to the facility.R901On 10/21/25 at approximately 11:05 a.m., R901 was observed in their room, up in their wheelchair. R901 was queried regarding their IV ABT (intravenous antibiotics) and they reported they had a PICC line (PICC-peripherally inserted central catheter) in their upper left arm. R901 was queried if they had any concerns regarding their antibiotics that had been administered via the PICC line, and they reported that they did not get them the night they were admitted due the facility because the facility did order them in time. R901 reported they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2643927Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing was provided to meet resident needs for two residents (R901 and R903) of three residents reviewed for staffing. Findings include:On 10/21/25 a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed which alleged the facility did not have enough staff to meet resident needs.R901On 10/21/25 at approximately 11:05 a.m., R901 was observed in their room, up in their wheelchair. R901 was queried regarding the staffing levels in the facility and they reported that the facility is often short of staff and they have had to wait long wait times for their call button (a device used to notify staff of the need for assistance) to be answered resulting in significant delays in getting their needs met. On 10/21/25 the medical record for R901 was reviewed and revealed the following: R901 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], last readmitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2643927Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were provided for one resident (R901) of two residents reviewed for infection control. Findings include: On 10/21/25 a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed which alleged R901 was not provided adequate protections to prevent infection. On 10/21/25 at approximately 11:05 a.m., R901 was observed in their room, up in their wheelchair. R901 was queried regarding their IV ABT (intravenous antibiotics) and they indicated that they had a line (PICC-peripherally inserted central catheter) in their upper left arm. R901 was queried if they had any concerns regarding their antibiotics and they reported that they did not get them the night they were admitted , because the facility did not order them in time. R901 was queried if the Nursing staff were donning personal protective equipment (PPE) including gowns when providing care, and they reported that nobody was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 7/29/25 during an initial observation of the kitchen between 8:40 AM-9:30 AM, the following items were observed: There was a wet wiping rag lying on the counter and not stored inside the sanitizer bucket. Food Service Manager JJ confirmed the rag should be stored inside the sanitizer solution. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 3-304.14 Wiping Cloths, Use Limitation, .(B) Cloths in-use for wiping counters and other equipment surfaces shall be: (1) Held between uses in a chemical sanitizer solution at a concentration specified under S 4-501.114; The vent grates on the vent hood were observed with a buildup of grease and debris. Food Service Manager JJ stated the vent hood is cleaned quarterly.According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 4-602.13 Nonfood-Contact Surface,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-31 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement (QAPI) program failed to identify and implement plans to address systemic issues regarding Infection Control and Pest Control which had the ability to affect the health, safety and quality of life for all residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: A recertification survey was conducted 7/29/25 through 7/31/25 and systemic concerns were identified in Infection Control and Pest Control.On 7/31/25 at 3:16 PM, a meeting was held with the Administrator to discuss the priority and ongoing issues that the Quality Assurance (QA) committee had identified and were working on to improve the facility. The Administrator explained areas of concern the QA committee were currently working on; however, Infection Control and Pest Control were not identified as areas of concern. The Administrator was asked about the lack of infection surveillance for legionella and failure to follow the county's health department guidance. The Administrator was informed that throughout the survey,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program by eliminating harborage conditions and provision of routine and/or as needed pest control which had the potential to affect all residents (including R8) in the facility. Findings include:Observations during the recertification survey from 7/29/25 - 7/31/25 revealed flying insects were observed in multiple locations including the conference room (utilized by residents, visitors, and staff), throughout the hallways and resident rooms on first, second, and third floors, and in the resident dining areas on the second and third floor.The facility's main elevator was observed from 7/29/25 - 7/31/25 to have multiple dead insects inside the elevator's ceiling light cover.Additionally, just prior to the start of this survey, a resident was identified with maggots in a wound.On 7/29/25 at 10:10 AM, observation of the third floor dining room revealed five tables that had meal trays with uncovered food items. Additionally there was a small pushcart that contained several meal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and appropriate storage for three medication (med) carts and one medication (med) storage room of four med carts and two med storage rooms that were reviewed for medication storage and labeling. Findings include:On [DATE] at approximately 12:43 p.m., a medication cart on the second floor (med cart one) was reviewed with Nurse Z and revealed an insulin kwickpen that had an opened date of [DATE] with an expiration date of [DATE]. Nurse Z was interviewed pertaining to the expired insulin pen and they reported they would have to discard it due to it being past the expiration date. On [DATE] at approximately 12:49 p.m., Medication cart 3 (med cart 3) was reviewed with Nurse HH on second floor. An opened vial of multidose insulin was observed to have an expiration date of [DATE]. Nurse HH was interviewed pertaining to the expired insulin vial and reported it would have to be thrown away and a new one had to be opened. On [DATE] at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure infection control standards, practices and protocols were followed consistently, failed to ensure an effective infection control surveillance program and failed to follow the county's health department guidance regarding the monitoring of legionella that included seven (R's 57, 5, 34, 142, 143, 63 & 144) of seven residents reviewed. Findings include: On 7/30/25 at 8:35 AM, observation of a medication administration for a resident in Contact Precautions revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) “F” was observed to put on an isolation gown, a simple mask and put on gloves from an isolation cart outside a room. LPN “F” entered the room, took the residents’ vitals, then walked back out of the room to stand at the medication cart in the hallway. LPN “F” then prepared the residents’ medications continuing to wear the same isolation gown and simple mask. After exiting the room, for the second time with the same gown and mask, LPN “F” removed the gown, mask and gloves and washed her hands. LPN “F” was asked about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 60 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure an effective system to monitor antibiotic use in the facility for four (R's 145, 14, 8 & 126) of four residents reviewed. Findings include:A review of the facility's Infection Control Logs and the monitoring of antibiotics revealed multiple residents identified to have potentially been prescribed an unnecessary antibiotic. A small sample was identified for review: April 2025- 4/20/25- R8 confusion, urgency, freq (frequency). Incont (incontinence). + dipstick UA (urinalysis). Macrobid.A review of a Nursing note dated 4/2025 at 5:59 PM, documented in part . writer observed resident with confusion. vitals are within normal limits. collected UA by straight cath. positive for leukocytes. Called on call and was given an order to start resident on Macrobid 100mg two times a day for 5 days. Sample was collected at 5:40 PM and placed in the 1st floor refrigerator.The medical record did not identify urgency, frequency or incontinence of urine. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience for one (R14) of one resident reviewed for dining, which had the ability to affect multiple residents who dined in the second floor dining room. Findings include: On 7/29/25 at 11:50 AM, an observation of the second floor lunch meal was conducted in the dining room area. Initially, 16 residents were observed in the dining room waiting to be served. At 12:20 PM, the first tray was observed being served. Flies were observed flying around the dining room. The first, second, third, fourth and fifth table were observed to have been provided their lunch meals, with the exception of two residents at the second table and R14 from the third table. The two residents from the second table and R14 were observed with no lunch meals to have been provided. At 12:37 PM, the two residents from the second table was provided their meal. One resident was observed to require the assistance of staff to be fed. At 12:39 PM, R14 was observed looking down, while the rest of the residents at table…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for two residents (R#'s 49 and 20), of two residents reviewed for accommodation of needs, resulting in the potential for delayed attention to resident care needs. Findings include:On 7/29/25 at 10:11 AM, R49's room was observed with the right side of their bed against the wall. R49 was in their wheelchair on the left side of the bed and it appeared their foot was wedged between the wheelchair pedal and the bottom of the bed rails. R49 asked for assistance to have their foot unstuck from under the bed. They were asked to activate their call light for staff assistance, and said they did not have their call light. At that time, the call light was observed hanging down from the call light box on the right side of the bed against the wall, not within reach of R49. On 7/29/25 at 10:18 AM, R20's room was observed with the left side of the bed against the wall. R20 was in their wheelchair on the right side of the bed at the foot. An oxygen concentrator was placed on the right side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (R55 and R30) of three residents reviewed for Advance Directives were educated and given the opportunity to formulate an advance directive for their health care wishes. Findings include:R55 On 7/29/25 at 10:45 AM, R55 was observed in bed. R55 had difficulty speaking at times, but appeared to clearly understand the questions being asked. At times, R55 had difficulty verbalizing a word, but explained he understood and knew what to say, but the words did not come out properly (aphasia). On 7/30/25 at 8:25 AM, R55 expressed concerns he had with the care in the facility. R55 said he got out of bed to go to therapy, but otherwise preferred to stay in his room. A review of R55's clinical record revealed R55 was admitted into the facility on 2/11/25 with diagnoses that included: cerebral ischemia (stroke). A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R55 had clear speech, with distinct intelligible words, mad…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident equipment was maintained in good repair for one (R8) of three residents reviewed for a homelike environment. Findings include:On 7/29/25 at 10:50 AM, an interview was conducted with R8's Legal Guardian (LG) who was seated in a wheelchair next to the resident who was lying in bed. The wheelchair was observed to have a missing left armrest, and the wheels had no treads and were very worn. When asked about whether that had been provided by the facility or brought in from home, the LG reported that was provided by the facility. When asked how long the wheelchair had been in that condition and if anyone had identified a need to replace or repair the wheelchair, the LG reported the wheelchair had been a wreck for a while and no one from the facility had ever asked about it before.On 7/31/25 at 9:10 AM, an interview and observation of the third floor was conducted with the Maintenance Director (Staff 'R') who has worked at the facility for about four years and in the Director role for about four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for one (R141) of five residents reviewed for abuse resulting in R141 being left on a bedpan for four hours. Findings include: On 7/29/25 at 9:56 AM, R141 was observed lying in bed. R141 was asked about care at the facility. R141 explained a couple nights before he had to go to the bathroom during the night. the aide put him on a bedpan. she did not come back, he was on the bedpan for four hours, his bottom was hurting bad, his legs and heels still hurt from being on the bedpan that long. then when the aide finally came back, she took the bedpan to the bathroom, he thought she was going to clean him up, but she walked out of the room. he waited to see if she was going to get supplies, but she did not come back, so he pushed his call light again after about 15-20 minutes. the aide came back and asked what he needed, he asked if she was going to clean him up, she told him she had forgotten and would get the supplies. she never came back. the day shift aide was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect a resident from exploitation for one (R124) of five residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: On 7/29/25 at 11:13 AM, R124 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in his room. R124 was asked if he was able to take himself to the bathroom. R124 explained he needed staff assistance.Review of the clinical record revealed R124 was admitted into the facility on 6/25/25 with diagnoses that included: metabolic encephalopathy, multiple fractures of ribs and diabetes. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R124 had moderately impaired cognition.On 7/31/25 at 12:01 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) L was interviewed about a concern with R124's roommate. During this interview, CNA L was asked if on the morning of 7/28/25 R124 and his bed were left wet. CNA L explained when she started her shift that morning, she had been given no report and both R124 and his roommate needed to be cleaned up. CNA L then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a stop-date for a PRN (as needed) order for anti-anxiety medication for one resident (R120), of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: On 7/31/2025 at 11:02 AM, a review of R120's clinical record revealed they most recently re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: heart disease, protein calorie malnutrition, adjustment disorder, anxiety disorder, falls, delirium, depression, and dementia with behaviors. R120's physician orders were reviewed and revealed a current, active order originating 12/20/24 for Ativan 0.5 mg (milligrams) to be given every four hours as needed. It was noted the medication had been re-ordered on 3/13/25 and 6/9/25 with the same instructions, to be given every four hours as needed with no duration of time for use defined. A review of R120's monthly medication regimen review reports prepared by the facility's pharmacist and reviewed and signed by the attending…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #1227216 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect and an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency for two residents (R138 and R141) of five residents reviewed for abuse, neglect and mistreatment. Findings include: On 7/29/25 a complaint that was submitted to the State Agency was reviewed that alleged R138 had a head wound from an unknown origin. On 7/29/25 the medical record for R138 was reviewed and revealed the following: R138 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Dementia and Brief Psychotic disorder and was discharged to the hospital on 6/16/25. A review of R138’s MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/5/25 revealed R138 needed supervision from facility staff with most of their activities of daily living. A review of R138's progress notes revealed the following: 6/14/2025- Noted new skin issue observed by CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #1227216Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete and document a thorough investigation into an injury of unknown origin for one resident (R138) of five residents reviewed for abuse/neglect/mistreatment. Findings include: On 7/29/25 a complaint that was submitted to the State Agency was reviewed that alleged R138 had a head wound from an unknown origin. On 7/29/25 the medical record for R138 was reviewed and revealed the following: R138 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Dementia and Brief Psychotic disorder and was discharged to the hospital on 6/16/25. A review of R138's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/5/25 revealed R138 needed supervision from facility staff with most of their activities of daily living. A review of R138's progress notes revealed the following: 6/14/2025- Noted new skin issue observed by CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). Resident observed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments was completed accurately for one (R120) of three reviewed for the resident assessment task. Findings include:On 7/29/25 at 10:05 AM, R120 was observed lying in bed and a visitor was conducting a clinical assessment. Upon exit from the room, the visitor reported they were a Hospice Nurse (Nurse 'U') as R120 was on their services.Review of the clinical record revealed R120 was initially admitted into the facility on 6/24/24 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and encounter for palliative care.Review of the physician orders revealed R12 had signed onto hospice services on 11/14/24 and as this review, remained on hospice.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments included a significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] and quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive resident centered care plan was developed and implemented for an anxiety disorder for one (R30) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: On 7/29/25 at 11:17 AM, R30 was observed lying down on their back in bed. A brief interview was conducted with the resident at that time. A review of the medical record revealed R30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included an anxiety disorderA review of R30's physician orders revealed . Alprazolam oral tablet 0.5 mg (milligram). Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for anxiety or panic related to anxiety disorder. A review of the care plans revealed no documentation of a care plan implemented for the resident's anxiety disorder or interventions to help the resident manage their anxiety before the use of medication. On 7/30/25 at 2:19 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed and asked who responsibility it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #1227212Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to consistently provide bathing assistance/services for one (R63) of seven residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Findings include: On 7/29/25 at 11:59 AM, R63 was observed sitting in their wheelchair in the dining room. When asked, R63 explained they were supposed to get showers twice a week on Tuesdays and Fridays, however stated the staff had only been giving them a shower once a week. R63 stated last week they did not receive their Tuesday shower and today (Tuesday 7/29/25) they were supposed to receive a shower and had not. R63 stated they were unsure if they would receive their shower later in the day. On 7/30/25 at 1:36 PM, R63 was observed sitting in their wheelchair in their room. When asked if they received their Tuesday 7/29/25 shower, R63 replied . No, I had to gather what I could. and try to do a sponge bath in my bathroom. At this time, a record review was completed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure bed mobility was performed in a safe manner for one (R105) of three residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: On 7/29/25 at 10:14 AM, R105 was observed lying in her bed. R105 was asked about care at the facility. R105 explained the day before, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) had rolled her over in the bed not realizing the bed was away from the wall, she fell between the bed and the wall and hurt her foot. this was the second time they had taken x-rays of her foot because it was still hurting. R105's bed was observed to have the right side of the bed against the wall. R105 was asked if her bed was always in that position. R105 explained since the call light was located on the wall, staff were always moving her bed away from the wall so they could turn the light off and neither her nor the CNA had realized it was away from the wall when the CNA rolled her over, she just rolled off the bed.Review of the clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure timely reviewal of the pharmacist recommendations, physician review/documented response of the pharmacist recommendations, maintain documentation of the pharmacist recommendations in the medical record and establish and implement a facility policy for drug regimen reviews for two (R's 30 & 121) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R30On 7/29/25 at 11:17 AM, R30 was observed lying down on their back in bed. A brief interview was conducted with the resident at that time. A review of the medical record revealed R30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, dysphagia (difficulty speaking) and an anxiety disorder. A review of the medication regime review completed by the facility's pharmacist consultant revealed irregularities noted on the 5/3/25, 5/20/25 & 6/29/25 reviews. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for one (R96) of one residents reviewed for medical records. Findings include: On 7/29/25 at 10:11 AM, R96 was observed lying in her bed. R96's Family Member (FM) GG was also in the room and explained due to R96's aphasia (language disorder that affects communication) she was trying to get a Power of Attorney (POA) because her lawyer had told her not to get Guardianship because R96 was not incompetent.Review of the clinical record revealed R96 was admitted into the facility on 7/9/25 with diagnoses that included: stroke, aphasia and heart disease. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R96 had severely impaired cognition.Review of R96's progress notes revealed a Social Services note dated 7/19/25 at 8:45 AM by Social Services (SS) N that read in part, An admission assessment was completed with a reference date of 7/14/25. The resident is A&Ox3 (alert and orientated times 3 -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure facility staff had a clear understanding of the Binding Arbitration agreement and residents received a clear explanation of the agreement prior to signing a legal document for two (R84 and R80) of three residents reviewed for the Arbitration Task. Findings include: During the entrance conference the facility explained a Binding Arbitration agreement was offered to all residents admitted into the facility. The facility provided a list of residents that had agreed to the Binding Arbitration agreement that included R84 and R80.Review of the facility's document titled, Agreement To Resolve Legal Disputes Through Arbitration undated read in part, .Any legal controversy, dispute, disagreement or claim of any kind now existing or occurring in the future between the parties arising out of or in any way relating to this Arbitration Agreement or the Resident's stay. shall be settled by binding arbitration. THIS ARBITRATION AGREEMENT WAIVES THEIR RIGHT TO A TRIAL IN COURT AND A TRIAL BY A JURY FOR ANY LEGAL CLAIMS THEY MAY HAVE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #MI00152409. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to address grievances for one resident, (R702) of two residents reviewed for grievances, resulting in verbalized frustrations with quality of care. Findings include: A complaint received by the State Agency alleged the facility failed to address multiple instances of resident/family grievances. On 5/15/25 at 12:58 PM, a review of a facility provided investigation file was conducted. The file contained a typed document prepared by Social Worker 'A' that read, During my phone call with (R702's family member) some concerns were expressed .(R702's family member) stated that during her visit yesterday (R702's) nurse was rude and she got into a, 'back-and-forth' with the nurse .(R702's family member) also reported that every time she has come to visit her mother, (R702) is soiled, sometimes to the point that her bedding is soaked . Continued review of the file included a Concern Form initiated by Social Worker 'A' and completed by the facility's Administrator. The section headed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00151836. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate multiple falls to determine the root cause and implement effective interventions that included adequate supervision for one (R805) of two residents reviewed for falls, who had repeated falls, resulting in the resident falling 15 times in three months and sustaining a head injury and forehead laceration. Findings include: On 4/10/25 at 4:05 PM, R805 was observed in bed with eyes closed. R805 woke up upon entrance into his room. R805's water cup was observed on an over bed table that was not within reach of the resident. A wound of some sort was observed on R805's forehead. R805 did not participate in a conversation when addressed. A review of R805's clinical record revealed R805 was admitted into the facility on 1/8/25 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: dementia, psychotic disorder with delusions, and insomnia. A review of a Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00151890. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of property to the Administrator and/or State Survey Agency for one (R802) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the State Survey Agency revealed allegations that included, Someone at the nursing home has been taking money from (R802) .There was a cell phone bill for $2000 from calls being placed to [NAME]. There was $400 used at (name of grocery store) up the street from the nursing home. Someone was using (R802's) cell phone to make purchases through account .Over the past several months there had been charges for (name of ride share company) rides, (name of grocery store) and (name of drug store). Someone has been purchasing gift cards using the money out of (R802's) account. The gift cards were purchased in (name of city) and (name of city) with her debit card. There have been thousands of dollars…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00151836. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly and discarded by the expiration date for two of two medication carts reviewed. Findings include: On 4/10/25 at 8:36 AM, an observation of the [NAME] Unit was conducted. A medication cart was observed unlocked and unattended to. When the top drawer was opened, a plastic cup contained one small, round, clear, yellow pill. On 4/10/25 at approximately 8:40 AM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 'C'. LPN 'C' reported the medication cart should have remained locked when not attended to. When queried about the loose pill in the cart, LPN 'C' reported it was left there from midnight shift, but identified the pill as bezonatate (a medication to relieve coughing). LPN 'C' explained all medications should remain in their package and/or bottle until ready for administration. On 4/10/25 at 9:10 AM, an observation of the 3rd floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00149313. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure regularly scheduled bathing was provided for one resident (R902) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Findings include: On 3/5/25 a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed that alleged R902 was not receiving regular bathing. A grievance form dated 1/6/25 was reviewed and revealed the following: [R902] did not receive his shower on 1/2 . On 3/5/25 the medical record for R902 was reviewed and revealed the following: R902 was initially admitted on [DATE] and was discharged on 1/22/25. R902 had diagnoses including Heart failure and Weakness. A review of R902's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/22/24 revealed R902 needed assistance from facility staff with bathing. A review of R902's comprehensive careplan revealed the following: Focus-I need assistance with my ADL's. Date Initiated: 11/17/2024 . A Physician's order dated 11/18/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00147486. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act resulting in a delay in notification of the allegation to the abuse coordinator and delay in reporting the allegation to the State Agency for one resident (R901) of two residents reviewed for abuse/neglect/mistreatment. Findings include: On 10/28/24 a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) was reviewed that alleged R901 was physically and verbally abused by CNA C on 10/12/24. On 10/28/24 an initial FRI (facility reported incident) was reviewed in the State of Michigan reporting system that indicated the initial report of the allegation was submitted on 10/12/24 at 8:56 a.m., by the Director of Nursing (DON). On 10/28/24 at approximately 8:57 a.m., 8:57 a.m., during a conversation with the facility Administrator (who is also the abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #s MI001146438, MI00146642, and MI00146819. Based on observation, interview, and record review facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of residents, including four (R802, R804, R805, and R806) of four residents reviewed for sufficient nursing staff. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents that reside at the facility. Findings include: Review of multiple concerns reported to the State Agency included allegations that residents were left for long periods of time in wet/soiled briefs, not provided with feeding assistance per plan of care, and were not being supervised adequately. R802 On 9/17/24 at 9:10 AM, R802 was observed lying in bed. R802 was asked about the care at the facility. R802 explained staffing had been a great issue lately; on the 2nd floor, there were only four CNA's scheduled, and usually at least one called in, so there would only be three CNA's to care for all the residents. When asked how many nurses were on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-17 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was reviewed and revised in accordance with current regulatory requirements including changes in resident care needs (R805) and administrative changes, resulting in insufficient resources to provide for resident care and emergency/disaster needs for all 97 residents. Findings include: According to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) memo: QSO (Quality Safety & Oversight)-24-13-NH, dated 6/18/2024, revised Facility Assessment requirements effective 8/8/2024 included: .The facility assessment must address or include the following .The care required by the resident population .consistent with and informed by individual resident assessments as required under 483.20 .In conducting the facility assessment, the facility must ensure .Direct care staff, including but not limited to, RNs (Registered Nurses), LPNs/LVNs (Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses), NAs (Nurse Aides), and representatives of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00146443. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident between two (R803 and R804) of 11 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) revealed there was a resident to resident incident that resulted in injury. On 9/16/24 at 10:00 AM, R803 was observed reading while seated in wheelchair next to their bed. When asked about the incident that occurred with R804 on 8/4/24, R803 pointed to the top of their right wrist and stated the scratch there won't go away. There was a linear scab approximately three inches in length to the top right wrist area. The resident reported R803 just came into their room and when they asked R803 to get out, that resident started beating them in the head and arm. Further review of the facility's investigation into the incident on 8/4/24 documented: [R803] has been a resident at the facility since…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #s: MI00146438, MI00146642, and MI00146819. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one-to-one feeding assistance for one resident (R806) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: Review of multiple complaints reported to the State Agency alleged residents were not being offered feeding assistance per their plan of care. The facility was previously determined to be out of compliance for concerns with provision of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) during the recertification survey conducted on 7/17/24 with an alleged compliance date of 8/20/24. On 9/16/24 at 9:45 AM, R806 was observed in their room, laying in a reclined position in a gerichair. Their meal tray was observed placed on an overbed tray table directly in front of them that contained a Styrofoam container and a Styrofoam cup with a straw. R806 did not have a clothing protector on and was observed to have scrambled egg in the front of their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #s: MI00146642 and MI00146819. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide drink and adaptive utensils per assessment and individualized care plan for one (R806) of three residents reviewed for dining. Findings include: Review of multiple complaints reported to the State Agency alleged residents were not being provided with food and drink per their plan of care. On 9/16/24 at 9:45 AM, R806 was observed in their room, laying in a reclined position in a gerichair. Their meal tray was observed placed on an overbed tray table directly in front of them that contained a Styrofoam container and a Styrofoam cup with a straw. R806 did not have a clothing protector on and was observed to have scrambled egg in the front of their neck and clothing. Upon approach, R806 reported they were upset since they usually were brought to the dining room for meals, but this morning they were not because they said it was due to a covid outbreak. When asked about if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-17 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure enough kitchen staff were available to prepare and serve meals in a timely manner. This deficient practice had the ability to affect multiple residents who received meals at the facility, including but not limited to R5, R28 and R64. Findings include: R5 On 7/15/24 at approximately 11:57 AM, R5 was observed sitting in a chair in their room. The resident's family member was present as well. R5 was alert but not able to answer all questions asked. R5's family member was interviewed at that time. The family member reported that R5 had been in the facility for about seven months and noted that their biggest concern was with staffing, specifically related to food services. The family member reported that on Saturday (7/13/24), R5 did receive their lunch very late (approximately 1:30 PM) and stated that the meal was incorrect and by the time they corrected it was about 15-20 minutes later. The family member noted that it was not the first…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen, maintain equipment in good repair, and safely store and handle food, resulting in an increased risk of foodborne illness, affecting all residents in the facility. Findings include: On 7/15/24 at 9:18 AM, during an inspection of the kitchen, the following observation were made: 9:18 AM, a container of cooked eggs, tomato sauce, cheese, sliced ham, shrimp, deli meat, and chicken salad were observed to be stored in the walk-in cooler with no date marking to identify the discard date. Additionally, the floor in the walk-in cooler was observed to be soiled with dried spills and food debris. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code Section 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking. (A) Except when PACKAGING FOOD using a REDUCED OXYGEN PACKAGING method as specified under § 3-502.12, and except as specified in (E) and (F) of this section, refrigerated, READY-TO EAT, TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD prepared and held in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT for more…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all staff followed proper infection control practices and protocols including transmission-based precautions and Enhanced barrier precautions for five (R7, R18, R49, R63, R298) of five residents reviewed for Infection Control. Findings include: Prior to entering R7's room at approximately 9:47 AM on 7/15/24, an Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) sign was observed near the resident's door. There was no personal protective equipment (PPE) in or near the resident's room, multiple staff members were observed entering and exiting the room without any PPE on or performing hand hygiene. Upon entering the room no PPE was noted to be disposed of in the trash can. R7 was observed to be lying on their back. On 7/15/24 at 12:17 PM, LPN L was observed outside of R7's room with the medication cart. LPN L was observed to have came out of the room with a used medication syringe. When asked which resident was on EBP they stated that they believed it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00145365. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the rights of one resident (R26) to be free from resident-to-resident verbal and physical abuse by R67 resulting in continued abuse to have occurred. Findings include: Review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented in part . On May 31, 2024, (nurse name) observed (R67 name) and (R26 name) in the hallway. While approaching them (nurse) observed (R26) call (R67) a derogatory term. (R67) then proceed to hit (R26) with his walker. He hit her in her left shin. (R26) grabbed her leg and yelled out in pain. (nurse) immediately intervened and separated and redirected both residents back to their room. Review of the medical records for R's 26 & 67 documented this event to have occurred on 5/27/24, not 5/31/24 as submitted to the SA. On 7/15/24 at 9:30 AM, R26 was observed sitting in their wheelchair outside the nurses station. When asked about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practices (DPS). DPS #1 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement Physician treatment orders in a timely manner for one resident (R28) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: On 7/15/24 at approximately 10:11 a.m., R28 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R28 indicated they were in pain and had wounds on their backside. R28 was queried if the staff were completing their wound dressings and they reported that sometimes dressings do not get changed. On 7/16/24 the medical record for R28 was reviewed and revealed the following: R28 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Bipolar disorder and Cerebral Infarction. A review of R28's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/20/24 revealed R28 needed assistance from facility staff with most of their activities of daily living. R28's BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score was 13 indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely meals, resulting in late meal times outside of resident preferences and needs, affecting residents on the 2nd floor and in resident council. Findings include: On 7/16/24 at 9:30 AM, the breakfast meal time was observed to still be in progress. During an interview on 7/16/24 at 12:06 PM, Dietary Staff W confirmed that meals are often served late due to staffing issues. On 7/16/24 at 1:30 PM, the last meal tray was observed to be delivered on the 2nd floor. During an interview on 7/16/24 at 1:33 PM, LPN K was queried on the lunch times and stated that lunch usually finishes around 1:00PM to 1:30 PM. According to the Meal Times, document posted at each dining room, it notes, Breakfast: 1st Floor Pavilion: 7:30 AM, 2nd Floor Pavilion: 8:00 AM, 3rd Floor Pavilion: 7:30 AM Lunch: 1st Floor Pavilion: 11:30 AM, 2nd Floor Pavilion: 12:00 PM, 3rd Floor Pavilion: 11:30 AM Dinner: 1st Floor Pavilion: 5:30 PM, 2nd Floor Pavilion: 6:00 PM, 3rd Floor Pavilion: 5:30 PM On 7/16/24 at approximately 10:42 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Control Preventionist attended the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) meetings at least quarterly, resulting in the potential for lack of coordination of resident care policies and overall medical care that could affect all 101 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 7/17/24 at 2:44PM, a review of the facility's QAPI program was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). Upon review of the sign-in sheets for the QAPI meetings held in 2024, it was noted that the infection control preventionist did not sign in at the January through June 2024 QAPI meetings. This was confirmed by the NHA, who stated she was not present at all meetings and there was no sign in for her but she should have signed if she was present. The Director of Nursing(DON) stated that the infection Control Preventionist joined the meetings via zoom. She was asked does she have any proof that they hold zoom QAPI meetings. The DON stated there was no way to show a zoom meeting. At 3:20PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program that consistently identified signs and symptoms of infection and failed to provide clinical justification for the use of antibiotic medications with the potential to affect all residents (including R88) requiring antibiotics in the facility. Findings include: On 7/16/24 at 2:13 PM an email was sent to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) requesting the infection control logs/books for the past six months. On 7/16/24 at 3:06 PM NHA replied via email, stating that Infection Preventionist (IP) Nurse A would be available on 7/17/24 at 2:30 PM. On 7/16/24 at 3:11 PM an email was sent to NHA stating If at all possible, we will need to have access to this information to review much sooner as there is A LOT of information to review. Is there anyone else that can assist with it? On 7/16/24 at 3:33 PM NHA replied via email stating IP nurse A (name redacted) will have the books ready for you tomorrow morning and will be back at 2:30pm tomorrow for questions. On 7/17/24 at 9:39 AM email…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate advance directive information, including social service assessment and a physician order for a Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) was in place for one (R83) of five residents reviewed for advance directives. Findings include: Review of the facility's advance directive form signed and dated by R28 and Physician 'G' on 2/13/24 documented R83's code status was to be a DNR. Review of the current advance directive (AD) order that was active since 8/19/23 read, AD: Full Code. On 7/15/24 at 11:00 AM, R83 was asked about their code status and reported they wanted to be a DNR and had completed that paperwork. Further review of the clinical record revealed R83 was admitted into the facility on 8/19/23 with diagnoses that included: congestive heart failure, permanent atrial fibrillation, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R83 had intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an annual OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) Level I evaluation to determine if a Level II Evaluation was needed, or if exemption was identified for one (R31) of one resident reviewed for PASARR (Preadmission Screen and Resident Review). Findings include: A review of R31's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: psychotic disorder, Lewy Body Dementia and Parkinsonism. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4/15 (severely cognitively impaired). Continued review of R31's clinical record revealed a document titled PASRR Level 1 (DCH-3877). Section 1 was completed documenting the resident's personal information and information about their legal representative. Section II documented Yes to four questions that noted the resident had diagnoses of both mental illness and dementia and listed the antipsychotic medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for oxygen use and specific transmission-based precautions for one (R18) of 25 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings include: On 7/15/24 at 11:18 AM, R18's call light was observed activated (lit up in hallway outside of the room). There was signage posted outside the door that identified R18 was on transmission-based precautions, specifically contact precautions. Upon entry into the resident's room, oxygen was observed in use via nasal cannula. R18 was unable to respond to simple questions asked. Review of the clinical record revealed R18 was initially admitted into the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: metabolic encephalopathy, cognitive communication deficit, other pericardial effusion, and epilepsy. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R18 had severely impaired cognition, and did not receive oxygen. Further review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a shower for one (R349) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: On 7/15/24 at 10:27AM, R349 was observed in their room visiting with family. When asked how was the care that they received, R349 and a family member both stated that the facility was fine but they did not know any schedules and would like to receive a shower. The family member was then asked how many showers have they received and they stated one on Saturday (7/13/24). They further stated the only reason they (facility staff) gave R349 one was because they came up to the facility ready to give them a bath themselves. R349 then stated, I ask for a shower all the time but I just don't know when I should get one and I was supposed to get one on this passed Wednesday, but something happened and I didn't get it. A review of the record revealed that R349 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: effusion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred appropriately to prevent injury and ensure a thorough investigation was completed for one (R26) out of three residents reviewed for accidents/falls. Findings include: On 7/15/24 at approximately 9:30 AM, R26 was observed in their wheelchair outside the nurse's station. The resident was alert, but not able to accurately answer most questions asked. A review of R26's clinical record revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: heart failure, diabetes type II, dementia and bipolar disease. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] noted that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5/15 (severe cognitive impairment). The resident's care plan (5/30/24) noted the resident was a two-person assist for transfers utilizing a [NAME] sit-to-stand machine. Continued review of R26's clinical record documented, in part, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication regimen reviews were conducted by the consultant pharmacist monthly for one (R18) of five residents reviewed for medication regimen reviews. Findings include: Review of R18's monthly medication regimen reviews from August 2023 to July 2024 revealed there were no monthly regimen reviews documented in the clinical record for August 2023, December 2023, and March 2024. Further review of the clinical record revealed R18 was initially admitted into the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: metabolic encephalopathy, cognitive communication deficit, other pericardial effusion, candidal stomatitis, bacteremia, dysphagia, epilepsy, osteoarthritis, cerebral ischemia, urinary tract infection,benign paroxysmal vertigo bilateral, presence of neurostimulator, major depressive disorder recurrent, moderate, insomnia, bipolar disorder, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, essential hypertension,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, & record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors in regard to seizure medications for two (R18 and R88) of two residents reviewed for medication errors, resulting in delayed administration, delayed physician notification, and increased seizure risk. Findings include: R18: On 7/15/24 at 11:28 AM, Nurse 'H' was observed across the hall from R18's room. When asked about whether the resident had received their morning medications, Nurse 'H' reported they had not and were currently trying to cover as there was a call-in. 07/15/24 12:26 PM, review of R18's Medication Administration Records (MARs) revealed they had not yet received their morning medication as prescribed by the physician. Further review of these medications included the following anti-seizure medication: Clobazam Oral Tablet 10 MG (Milligram)- give 2 tablet by mouth two times a day for anticonvulsant (ordered to be given at 9:00 AM and 9:00 PM). The last documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to timely notify the physician of abnormal laboratory results for one (R26) of two reviewed for laboratory services. Findings include: On 7/15/24 at approximately 9:30 AM, R26 was observed in their wheelchair outside the nurse's station. The resident was alert, but not able to accurately answer most questions asked. A review of R26's clinical record revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: heart failure, diabetes type II, dementia and bipolar disease. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) noted that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5/15 (severe cognitive impairment). Continued review of R26's clinical record noted the following: Behavior Note (7/8/24): R26 continues to yell help repeatedly, again tonight .She is not sleeping and has not had any quiet rest periods for more than few minutes at a time tonight .continues to lay in bed yelling out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00145467. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences were honored for six residents (R28, R36, R49, R56, R72, R74, and R78) as well as multiple attendees at the confidential resident council meeting, resulting in verbalized complaints and dissatisfaction with meals. Findings include: Review of a complaint reported to the State Agency alleged ongoing issues with the facility's food and read, .The facility has been out of a lot of different foods since last week .Residents are getting cold food and don't have many options for meal choices .the residents are being served peanut butter & jelly sandwiches for meals. According to the facility's policy titled, Food Preferences dated 5/2023: .Resident food and beverage preferences will be obtained upon admission and periodically as needed to assist the Food & Nutrition Services department in providing preferred food and beverages to enhance/maintain quality of life and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake(s): MI00144553 & MI00144307. Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to document follow-up and addressed concerns per the facility's Concern/Complaint Policy and Procedure for two (R's 901 & 902) of two residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: R902 Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented concerns regarding the resident food preferences to not be honored, non-edible overcooked food and not being offered ice water. On 6/3/24 at 11:30 AM, R902 was observed in their room sitting in their electronic wheelchair. When asked, R902 stated the facility's food service and delivery was not consistent. R902 stated sometimes the meat is so hard they can't bite into it and staff are unable to cut it. R902 stated the facility didn't have milk for a few days recently and complained about the facility's staff not honoring their meal selections. R902 stated that they met with the Ombudsman to talk about these concerns…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #MI00143969. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, safe, and homelike environment, as evidenced by offensive odors, soiled floors, walls, and trash/debris left in the main dining rooms. This deficient practice has the potential to affect multiple residents throughout the facility. Findings include: Review of complaints filed with the State Agency included allegations that the facility was not clean. The following observations were conducted from 4/29/24 - 4/30/24: On 4/29/24 at 11:15 AM, upon exiting the elevator to the third floor there was a strong, lingering urine odor that was pervasive throughout the entire floor. At 4/29/24 at 2:40 PM, the strong urine odor remained. On 4/29/24 at 11:24 AM, upon entering the second-floor dining room, the floor was observed to have scattered debris and was very sticky (this Surveyor's shoes stuck to the floor when attempting to walk). The flooring throughout the satellite kitchen within this dining room was soiled and had small papers discarded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00143969. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control protocols (handwashing and/or use of hand sanitizer) were followed for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for one (R904) resident reviewed for infection control. Findings include: Review of complaints filed with the State Agency included an allegation that the facility filed to follow proper infection control protocols. According to the facility's, Pavilion Enhanced Barrier Precautions Protocol dated Revised on 3/31/2024: .Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refer to the use of additional personal protective equipment (PPE) and infection control measures to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, particularly in individuals with MDRO (Multi-Drug Resistant Organism) infection or colonization, indwelling devices, and wounds/chronic wounds .Practice hand hygiene by thoroughly washing hand for at least 20 seconds . On 4/29/24 at 12:42 PM, there was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews/record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for one (R900) of one resident reviewed for abuse. Findings include: On 4/29/24 at 11:30 AM, an interview was conducted with R900 (resident named in the complaint). R900 reported CNA (certified nursing assistant) T came into his room to change his brief and when CNA T turned him on his right side they were rough and injured his left knee (swelling and pain) and his left hand (skin tear), R900 reported that he had a prior injury to the same knee and that the incident further aggravated it. On 4/49/24 at 2:49 PM DON (director of nursing) was queried regarding their investigation process for the potential abuse of R900 by CNA T. The DON reported that they were notified about the incident on the weekend. It was reported that the CNA T was rough with the resident, CNA T was immediately suspended, incident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident dignity for 10 residents (R#'s 58, 6, 82, 73, 52, 56,68,64, 307, and 11) of 10 residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in the potential for embarrassment and decreased feelings of self worth. Findings include: A review of a facility provided policy titled, Quality of Life-Dignity was conducted and read, .Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality . A review of a second facility provided policy titled, Dining Policy was conducted and read, .8. For those residents that require assistance with feeding, staff will be seated so that they are at the level of the resident to ensure a dignified dining process . On 7/18/23 from 11:40 AM until 12:33 PM, an observation of the third floor dining room was conducted. During the observation R58, R6, R82, and R73 were observed seated together at a table. R6 and 73 were observed eating their lunch meal, however; R58 and and R82 had not been served their lunch. At 11:55 AM, R58…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for four residents, (R#'s 52, 58, 82, and 10) of four residents reviewed for physical environment. Facility also failed to maintain a clean comfortable home like environment in the dining room on the second floor that had the potential to impact all residents who were using the dining room for their meals and other activities. Findings include: On 7/18/23 at 9:52 AM, the material on the left side padded armrest of R82's wheelchair was observed to be cracked and peeling away from the padding. On 7/18/23 at 10:06 AM, R52 was observed in the common area of the third floor engaged in a group activity. At that time the right side padded armrest was observed to have duct tap securing the material to the armrest. At that time, R58 was also observed engaged in the group activity and it was observed the material on both the right and the left armrests was cracked and peeling. On 7/19/20 at 2:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-20 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure annual competencies/performance reviews for five of five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA's) reviewed for annual competencies. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. Findings include: 07/20/23 12:57 PM, a review of Certified Nurse Aide 'D' 'E', 'F', G' and 'U's 12-hour in-service education records, CNA certifications, and annual competency/performance review evaluations was conducted. It was discovered there were no annual competency evaluations for those staff members. On 7/20/23 at 1:07 PM, an interview was conducted with Staff Development Manager, Nurse 'L' regarding the competencies/performance reviews. They said they did not have them and didn't think any had been done since before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. A review of a facility provided policy titled, In-Service Training Program, Nurse Aide was conducted and read, .2. The facility will complete a performance review of nurse aides at least every 12 months. In-service training will be based on the outcome of the annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the Abuse Coordinator and/or State Agency for one (R86) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: On 7/18/23 at 11:32 AM, R86 was observed lying in bed. R86 was asked about care at the facility. R86 explained she had been humiliated by a couple of Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's) a couple of days previous. When asked if she had told anyone at the facility about the incident, R86 explained she had told the Supervisor. Review of the clinical record revealed R86 was admitted into the facility on 5/29/23 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: mysthenia gravis, stroke and fracture of left lower leg. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R86 was cognitively intact and required the extensive assistance of staff for all activities of daily living (ADL's). On 7/19/23 at 10:12 AM, the Administrator was asked for grievance forms and/or investigations for R86.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an updated/revised plan of care was in place for a contracture for one resident (R38) of four residents reviewed for range of motion/positioning. Findings include: On 7/18/23 at approximately 12:45 p.m. R38 was observed in their room, sitting in their chair. R38 pointed at their left hand that appeared to be contracted. No splint or protective roll was observed in the hand and R38's fingernail appeared to be long and pointed in towards the center of the palm. On 7/20/23 at approximately 8:28 a.m. R38 was observed in their wheelchair in the dining room. R38's left hand still appeared to be contracted with no protective devices or interventions applied. R38's fingernail was still observed to be long and pointed into the palm of the hand. On 7/18/23 the medical record for R38 was reviewed and revealed the following: R38 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Dementia and Age-related Osteoporosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely and appropriate assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for two (R6 and R8) of six Residents reviewed for ADL care with potential for negative physical, psychosocial outcomes, and potential loss of dignity for residents who are dependent on staff for assistance. Findings include: R8 R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R8's admitting diagnoses included congestive heart failure, diabetes, polyneuropathy (simultaneous malfunction of many peripheral nerves throughout the body) and paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body). R8 was receiving hospice services as of 7/11/23. R8 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. R8 was dependent on staff assistance to get in and out of their bed. An initial observation was completed on 7/18/23, at approximately 2:30 PM. Staff were assisting R8. R8 reported that they would like to get out of bed every day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow up timely with the physician and/or to transfer a resident who had a change of condition to an acute care setting for one (R355) of one reviewed for change of condition resulting in the potential for a decline in health. Findings include: A record review revealed that R355 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted after hospitalization on 7/7/23. R355's admitting diagnoses include seizures, urinary tract infection, dementia, encephalopathy (any disease that affects the whole brain and alters its structure or how it works, and causes changes in mental function), and osteoarthritis. R355 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15, based on Minimum Data Set assessment completed on 5/17/23. R355 was recently admitted to hospital on [DATE] due to worsening edema, drowsiness and weakness and they were readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Based on R355's nursing admission assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practices Deficient practice #1 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly transfer one resident (R6) who required a mechanical lift of four residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: A review of a facility provided policy titled, Lifting Machine, Using a Mechanical was conducted and read, .1. At least two (2) nursing assistants are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift .Steps in the Procedure 1. Before using a lifting device, assess the resident's current condition, including: a. Physical: (1) Can the resident assist with transfer? (2) Is the resident's weight and medical condition appropriate for the use of a lift . On 7/19/23 at 8:31 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 'A' was observed transferring R6 from a reclining chair to their Broda (specialized) wheelchair. CNA 'A' was observed to grab R6 around the waist, pull them up, pivot them, and place them in their Broda Chair. CNA 'A' was then observed to pull R6 back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practices Deficient Practice #1 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistance with eating was provided to one resident (R60) of five residents reviewed for Nutrition. Findings include: On 7/19/23 at approximately 1:13 p.m., R60 was observed in the dining room on the 2nd floor with their lunch meal in front of them. R60 was observed to have spilled milk on the floor and table with their head bowed down on the table. No staff member was observed assisting R60 with the lunch meal. R60 had approximately 50% of the meal remaining on their plate. On 7/20/23 at approximately 8:33 a.m., R60 was observed being served their breakfast meal in the dining room. R60 was observed to start eating the meal with their bare hands. R60 was not observed to have any assistance from facility staff with eating their breakfast meal. On 7/20/23 at approximately 9:03 a.m., during a second observation, R60 was still observed to be slowly eating their breakfast…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was prescribed as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication had adequate behavior monitoring and identification of the resident specific targeted behaviors and non-pharmacological approaches at the time of medication administration for one (R5) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication Findings include: A review of a facility provided policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Policy was conducted and read, .Physicians and mid-level providers will use psychotropic medications appropriately working with the Interdisciplinary Team to ensure appropriate use, evaluation, and monitoring .Standards 3. The facility supports the goal of determining the underlying cause of behavioral symptoms so the appropriate treatment of environmental, medical, and/or behavioral interventions, as well as psychopharmacological medications can be utilized to meet the needs of the individual resident .Responsible Party-Actions Required: Primary Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-07-17 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and record review, the facility failed to eliminate pest harborage conditions, resulting in a presence of flying pests, affecting all residents in the facility. Findings include: On 7/15/24 at 9:39 AM, gnat activity was observed in the main kitchen at the floor drain grates provided at the cookline. Grease was observed caked on the floor drain grates providing harborage conditions for the pests. On 7/15/24 at 9:50 AM, gnat activity was observed in the dish washing area near the dish machine and three-compartment sink. Heavy water accumulation was observed on the floor at this time. On 7/15/24 at 11:45 AM, gnat activity was observed in the 1st floor kitchenette. On 7/15/24 at 11:50 AM, gnat activity was observed in the 2nd floor kitchenette. On 7/15/24 at 11:54 AM, gnat activity was observed in the 3rd floor kitchenette. On 7/15/24 at 12:14 PM, gnat activity was continued to be observed in the 1st floor kitchenette, concentrated around the juice machine. Dried spills were observed on the counter where the juice machine was located. On 7/16/24 at 12:51 PM, gnat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$45,461 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $45,461 — penalty dated 2023-09-07
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-09-30 for 2 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ORCHARDS MICHIGAN — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAUB, JACOB | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| WHITE LAKE HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/18/2024 |
| HURST, EMILY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/03/2024 |
| MCLEOD, LEIGH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/03/2024 |
| GUTMAN, ISAAC | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/03/2024 |
| HOFFMAN, ALEXANDER | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/03/2024 |
| KORNFELD, ROBERT | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/03/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235555. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.