No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Orchards at Redford

25330 West Six Mile Road, Redford, MI 48240 · For profit - Corporation · 88 certified beds · (313) 531-6874 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (313) 531-6874 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Feb 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
25855 W 6 Mile Rd · (313) 286-3031 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
25700 W 7 Mile Rd · (313) 592-1202 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
25451Grand River Ave · (313) 531-7090 · Call to confirm hours
Park
18250 Beech Daly Rd · (313) 387-2650 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.3%10.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.6%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.9%4.3%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.3%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.7%12.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.7%19.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.2%95.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.2%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.6%20.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.0%14.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.1%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine34.4%79.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.4%24.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.5%11.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.431.841.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.071.641.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 71% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.2%CMS range 40.5–63.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 7.2–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge51.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.2–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.18
RN hours/ resident / day
1.40
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.26
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.84
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 74.9 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-09)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-02)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-09 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit mandatory staffing data (direct care staffing information) to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) based on the Pay Roll Based Journal (PBJ) data, affecting all 72 residents who resident in the facility. Findings include: Per a review of the PBJ report for the Fiscal year 2026 1st quarter (July1,2025- September 30,2025). The facility also triggered for a one star staffing rating (indicating a lack of reported staffing or inadequate staffing). On 4/9/6 at 12:30 pm in an interview with Staffing Scheduler F and Human Resources (HR) Director L about the PBJ report and submission. HR L stated The facility failed to submit their quarterly staffing numbers to CMS due to a clerical error. No explanation was provided related to the specifics of the clerical error.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP), to include flushing all inactive fixtures to eliminate stagnation, resulting in the potential for increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility. Findings include: On 4/8/26 at 9:30 AM, Maintenance Supervisor I was queried regarding the facility's Water Management Program. Maintenance Supervisor I stated they test annually, water temps done daily, flushing of unused fixtures is done by environmental services, and that the building has been checked for plumbing dead legs. On 4/8/26 at 10:00 AM, the shower room located on the [NAME] Hall was observed with a sign posted on the door that the room was not in use. The door to the shower room was observed to be locked. Maintenance Supervisor I stated he would have to find the key to unlock the door. Maintenance Supervisor I searched for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0923 — pattern
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the mechanical ventilation system, for the [NAME] and North halls, and in the [NAME] soiled utility room. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents on the [NAME] and North halls. Findings include:On 04/08/2026 at 9:43 am, the [NAME] soiled utility room was observed with Maintenance Supervisor I. The soiled utility room had a strong, pungent odor. The mechanical ventilation was checked by placing a piece of toilet tissue against the ceiling vent grate. No suction was present, as the piece of toilet tissue did not cling to the ventilation grate cover. Maintenance Supervisor I confirmed that vent was not functional. The mechanical ventilation in the resident bathrooms on the [NAME] and North halls was also checked, and they were found to be non-functional. Maintenance Supervisor I confirmed that the same unit controlled the ventilation for the soiled utility room and the [NAME] and North Hall bathrooms and stated that it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the air conditioning unit and filter in a clean manner, for Resident #40, resulting in resident complaints with their living conditions. Findings include: On 4/8/26 at 2:30 PM, Resident #40 complained that the filter for the wall mounted air conditioning unit in her room is never cleaned. Resident #40 was visibly upset and stated that she is breathing in all that dust. Resident #40 further stated that she is on oxygen and already has a hard time breathing. The air conditioning unit was observed to be running and blowing air directly at the foot of the resident's bed. The outside front cover of the unit was observed to be coated with dust, and the interior filter was observed to be soiled with a buildup of dust. On 4/8/26 at 2:40 PM, Maintenance Supervisor I was queried about the cleaning of the air conditioner and stated that housekeeping was responsible for cleaning the exterior of the unit, and maintenance was responsible for cleaning the filter. Maintenance Supervisor I confirmed the dusty air conditioning unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely showers and incontinence care were provided to dependent residents for one resident (R77) of three reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Findings include: On 04/07/2026 at 12:00 PM, R77 was observed to be on their back in bed, dressed in a hospital style gown. R77 reported they had not received a shower the day before when they had asked staff. R77 reported they had asked staff for a shower this day and was told they were not signed up for a shower. R77 reported they had not had a shower in the three weeks they had been at the facility and due to their (Multiple Sclerosis) MS they needed assistance to take a shower. R77 also reported they pee a lot and their brief was currently wet. R77 activated their call light and Certified Nursing assistant (CNA) B entered the room and R77 asked about getting a shower. CNA B reported to R77 that as R77 had a wound they could not get a shower. CNA B also reported R77's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet the needs of the residents for three residents (R57, R2 and R39) of three residents reviewed for care needs being met. Findings include:R57 During an observation on 4/7/2026 at approximately 10:00 A.M. Resident (R57), who was alert and oriented, and cognitively intact, complained the facility did not have enough staff and during the night shift when the call light was pushed the Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) sometimes took as long as an hour to respond. R57 stated, I am at the end of the hall and when you need to be changed an hour is unacceptable. R2 On 4/7/26 at12:30 P.M. during a lunch meal observation R2 who was alert and oriented and cognitively intact, was interviewed concerning receiving cold food. R2 reported when returning from dialysis a meal tray was left on the bedside table and the food was cold, but no staff was available to reheat (R2) meal tray. R2 reported there is not enough staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely dental services for one resident (R3) of one reviewed for provision of dental care. Findings include: On 04/08/2026 at 2:10 PM, R3 was asked about any recent dental visits and reported they had not been seen by a dentist recently. R3 reported a concern for a mouth infection and some redness to the lower gumline. A review of the most recent dental visit note dated 11/20/25 documented two teeth with fractures and seven missing teeth. A review of the Nurse Practitioner (NP) progress note dated 01/20/2026 at 13:09 (1:09 PM) revealed, (R3) was seen today for follow up on sore gums and left knee pain . (R3) (complaint of) c/o pain to (their) upper gumline, inspected oral cavity. Patient has tooth decay and has a tooth that has partly came off. There is no redness of the gums or swelling, tender to touch . Assessment/Plan: Dental caries/sore . gums: no signs of infection. Will start patient on orajel . Needs Dentist evaluation . A review of the facility records for R3 revealed R3 was admitted into the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide coffee for two (R26, R62) of two residents reviewed for beverage preferences. Findings Include: On 4/7/2026 at 9:00 A.M., R26 was heard asking Unit manager (UM) E for a cup of coffee. R26 exchanged a few pleasantries with UM E and returned from the unit kitchen with a large cup of coffee. R26 proceeded to comment I never get coffee, it makes me feel so good in the morning, I miss my coffee. On 4/8/26 at 9:05 A.M., during a breakfast observation R26 asked Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) R for a cup of coffee. CNA R acknowledged R26's, request gesturing give me a minute I am helping (name of R39). Hearing R26's request nurse S spoke out stating, I will get your coffee. R26 leaned over the table to R55 and asked Do you want coffee? I don't know why we do not get coffee at least for breakfast. Nurse S began offering coffee and condiments to other residents within the dining area. During the meal service coffee was observed on a side table with other assorted beverages but residents were not offered or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a properly functioning communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for one (R76) of one resident reviewed for a properly function call light system. Findings include:On 4/7/26 at 9:22 AM, an interview with R76 was conducted and they reported that since they returned from the hospital two weeks ago the call button does not work. R76 reported that the past two nights were extremely rough for them because they needed to use the restroom but depend on staff to assist them to the toilet and when they pushed the call bell no one came in and when staff finally decided to stroll in they were already a big mess (had a bowel movement on themselves). An observation of the room was made, the call light button was on residents' bed and the box for the button was detached from the wall. R76 did not have a bell or any other means to communicate to the facility if assistance was needed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 2743619 and 2792857.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care needs were met timely for five residents (R901, R905, R906, R907, R908) of eight residents reviewed for unmet care needs. Findings include:R901On 03/04/26 at 8:59 AM and 9:46 AM, R901was observed to be lying in bed, with the head of the bed up around 20 - 30 degrees and dressed in a hospital style gown. A pillow was under the bottom sheet at the right side. R901 was not supported by the pillow. R901 was oriented with their right side to the wall. The call light was under the covers at the right side of R901. At 10:28 AM, R901 continued in bed as before. R901's Responsible Party (RP) was at the bedside and expressed concerns with staff assistance with the resident's needs. At this time the RP was able to show R901's legs were contracted, R901's legs were flexed at the knees so that the heels were at the buttocks. The knees were pointed toward the left side of the bed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 2743619 and 2792857.Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were fully functional for six residents (R901, R904, R905, R906, R907, R908) and two rooms of eight resident rooms reviewed for call light function. Findings include: R901On 03/04/26 at 8:59 AM and 9:46 AM, R901was observed to be lying in bed, with the head of the bed up around 20 - 30 degrees. The call light was under the covers at the right side of R901. At 10:28 AM, R901 continued in bed as before. R901's Responsible Party (RP) was at the bedside and expressed concerns for staff assistance with the resident's needs. On 03/05/26 at 8:01 AM, R901 was on their back in bed, the head of the bed up around 20 - 30 degrees. At 8:48 AM, staff were seated bedside. At 11:05 AM, R901 continued in bed positioned as before. The call pad style call light was hanging over the headboard of the bed. At 12:17 PM, R901 continued on their back as before. The call light was over the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 2743619 and 2792857.Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement interventions for two residents (R901, R903) of three reviewed for falls. Findings include: R901On 03/04/26 at 8:59 AM and 9:46 AM, R901 was observed to be lying in bed, with the head of the bed up around 20 - 30 degrees and dressed in a hospital style gown. A pillow was under the bottom sheet at the right side. R901 was not supported by the pillow. A mat was on the left side of the bed and a urinary catheter bag hung on the left side of the bed frame toward the foot of the bed. The right side of the bed was against the wall. R901 was oriented with their right side to the wall. The call light was under the covers at the right side of R901. The resident answered questions in a hushed voice. It was not confirmed that R901 was assisted to eat their breakfast meal. R901 was skin and bones with minimal visible muscle tissue to the arms and collar bones and shoulder joints. At 10:28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake numbers 1293719 and 1293580.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to answer a call light timely for one resident (R701) out of two reviewed for call lights. Findings include:On 7/9/2025 at 12:11 PM, R701 activated their call light. R701 stated they never answer the call light when it is activated and sometimes it will be on all night until the next day. R701 reported, the screen at the desk barely works. R701 reported the call light does not light up over the door, but rather shows up on a screen at the desk.A review of the medical record revealed that R701 admitted into the facility on 4/5/2024 with the following medical diagnoses, General Anxiety Disorder and Chronic Kidney Disease. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14/15 indicating an intact cognition. R701 also required assistance with bed mobility and transfers. On 7/9/2025 at 12:18 and 12:26 PM, R701's call light was noted to still be activated. No one was observed to come and address…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience for six residents, of 13 residents reviewed for dining, resulting in the potential for embarrassment and disappointment with the dining experience. Findings include: On 4/1/25 from 12:16 PM until 12:55 PM, an observation of the lunch meal was conducted on the Transitional Care Unit. It was observed R#'s 59, 75, and 21 were seated together at a table. R59 and R75 were served their meals and began eating. R21 was not served their meal with R59 and 75. R59 and R75 finished their meals at 12:30 PM and their plates were collected and returned to the satellite kitchen. At approximately 12:35 PM, R21 was finally served their lunch meal. On 3/31/25 at approximately 12:15 p.m., Observations of the lunch meal were made and the following was observed: R44 was observed in the TCU (transitional care unit) dining room seated at a table. R44 was observed to have the front of their shirt completely covered in wetness with no clothing protector observed to be on them. The other residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two residents (R44 and R69) were provided the option of an alternate entree, beverages and preferred deserts during the scheduled meals. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all of the 78 residents who eat meals prepared and served by the kitchen. Findings include: On 3/31/25 at approximately 12:15 p.m., Observations of the lunch meal were made and the following was observed: R44 was observed in the TCU (transitional care unit) dining room seated at a table. R44 was observed to have the front of their shirt completely covered in wetness with no clothing protector observed to be on them. The other residents surrounding them were observed to be eating their lunch meal with R44 watching them eat. At approximately 12:19 p.m., R44's meal ticket was observed and revealed the following: feeding assist No straws. At that time, three other residents observed at R44's table eating the lunch meal. R44 was still observed to be watching the other residents eat without being assisted with their meal.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure post-dinner snacks were available and offered for 18 residents residing in the Green Houses of a total of a total census of 78. Findings include: On 4/01/25 at approximately 12:31 p.m., during observations of the lunch meal in the Redford House Certified Nursing Assistant I (CNA I) was queried regarding post-dinner snacks for the residents in the [NAME] Houses. CNA I reported they did not have any snacks because the kitchen never sends them over to the houses. CNA I indicated that the kitchen is run by different staff and they do not give any snacks to the residents. On 4/01/25 at approximately 12:51 p.m., [NAME] House Manager F (GHM F) was queired regarding snacks for after the dinner meal and they reported the [NAME] Houses are not provided snacks from the Kitchen because the kitchen staff do not have a contract with the [NAME] Houses. GHM F was queried if they could remember the last time the [NAME] houses were provided evening snacks, and they indicated they have not had any snacks in a long time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice had the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents of the [NAME] House that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 04/01/25 at 12:45 PM, the [NAME] House dish machine was checked with [NAME] House Manager F. The dish machine was a low temperature, chemical sanitizing dish machine. When asked how staff checks the dish machine for sanitization, [NAME] House Manager F pointed to a dish machine log, and some Smart Power test strips (test strips used to test the levels of DDBSA and lactic acid sanitizer). Observation of the chemicals for the dish machine showed 1 bottle of liquid detergent, and 2 bottles of liquid rinse aide, hooked up to the automatic chemical dispenser for the dish machine. There was no sanitizer attached to the dish machine, to ensure that dishes were being sanitized. When asked how staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Deficient Practice #1 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were in place and implemented by staff for one resident, (R66) of one resident reviewed for EBP, resulting in the potential for the development of infection. Findings include: On 3/31/25 at 10:45 AM, R66 was observed in their bed. R66 was not responsive to attempts at verbal communication. At that time, R66 was observed to have a urinary catheter, a feeding tube, a tracheostomy, and was receiving oxygen through a tracheostomy mask. An observation of the door to R66's room from the hallway did not reveal any signage to indicate R66 was on enhanced barrier precautions. On 3/31/25 at 1:55 PM, Nurse 'C' and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 'B' were observed entering R66's room; they did not don an isolation gown or gloves prior to entering the room. At approximately 1:59 PM, entry was made into the room. Nurse 'C' was observed in the room and CNA 'B' had used the adjoining bathroom to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment with a functioning resident call system for four residents (R10, R16, R17 and R41) of seven residents reviewed for environmental concerns, of a total census of 78. Findings include: On 3/31/25 at approximately 9:11 a.m., R10 was observed in their room, up in their bed. R10's bathroom was observed to have an alert pull-cord tied to a non functioning piece of plastic on the alert box next to their toilet, rendering the cord to be unable to be used to call for assistance if needed. On 3/31/25 at approximately 10:55 a.m., R17 was observed in their room, up in their wheelchair. R17's bathroom was observed to have the Shower pull-cord that was connected to the alert system tied to a solid plastic piece on the box in a non-functional position, rendering the cord to be unable to be used to call for assistance if needed. On 3/31/25 at approximately 11:18 a.m., R41 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R41's bathroom was observed to have a shower with the shower pull-cord detached from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter care, assessment and monitoring was provided for one resident, (R66) of three residents reviewed for catheter care, resulting in the development of a urinary tract infection. Findings include: On 3/31/25 at 2:13 PM, R66 was observed in their bed. R66 was awake and alert, however; they did not respond to attempts at verbal conversation. It was observed R66 had an indwelling urinary catheter. The tubing connected to the collection bag revealed dark, cloudy urine with sediment built up in the tubing. A review of R66's clinical record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently re-admitted on [DATE]. R66's diagnoses included: respiratory failure, epilepsy, protein calorie malnutrition, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and urinary tract infection. A review of R66's physician's orders, medication administration records, treatment administration records, and certified nurse aide tasks was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutritious meals, and provide ongoing assessment and monitoring for weight loss for one resident, (R44) of four residents reviewed for nutrition resulting in weight loss. Findings include: On 3/31/25 at 12:27 PM, an observation of the lunch meal on the Transitional Care Unit was conducted. R44 was observed seated at the table with their pureed lunch meal in front of them. Their meal consisted only of a pureed sweet potato and an unidentifiable light greenish/tan pureed food. R44 was observed to be given one-to-one assistance from Certified Nurse Aide (CNA 'B') with the meal. CNA 'B' was asked what the unknown pureed item was and said they did not know. They further indicated R44 was a vegetarian and did not receive pork that was on the menu for that day. Staff in the satellite kitchen on the unit were asked what R44 was served and said they were served a pureed sweet potato and pureed cabbage with green beans. On 4/1/25 at 8:15 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure tube feeding formula was delivered at the physician ordered rate for one resident, (R73) of two residents reviewed for tube feeding. Findings include: On 3/31/25 at 11:00 AM, R73 was observed in their room in bed, asleep. R73 was receiving tube feeding formula via pump. The pump was observed to be programmed to deliver the formula at a rate of of 70 mL (milliliters) per hour. On 4/1/25 at 8:19 AM and 11:00 AM, additional observations were made of R73 receiving tube feeding via pump. The pump was observed to be programmed to deliver the formula at 70 mL per hour. The bottle of formula being delivered was observed to have a delivery rate of 75 mL per hour written on it. A review of R73's clinical record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: acute respiratory failure, stroke, aspiration pneumonia, presence of a tracheostomy and a feeding tube. A review of R73's physician's orders was conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an incapacitated resident (R17) was provided a legally authorized representative to make informed healthcare decisions of one residents reviewed for medically related Social Services. Findings include: On 3/31/25 at approximately 10:55 a.m., R17 was observed in room up in wheelchair. R17 was observed to have difficulty communicating and was unable to answer questions. On 4/1//25 the medical record for R17 was reviewed and revealed the following: R17 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Cerebral Palsy and Polyneuropathy. A review of R17's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/18/25 revealed R17 needed assistance from facility staff with their activities of daily living. R17's BIMS score (brief interview for mental status) was 10 indicating moderately impaired cognition. A review of R17's comprehensive careplan revealed the following: Focus-Cognition: I have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to attempt non-pharmacological interventions prior to PRN (as needed) anti-anxiety medication administration for one resident (R32) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Findings include On 3/31/25 at 9:00 AM, R32 was obsereved sitting in a chair in the dining room at a table with head down in breakfast plate. Resident appeared to be sleep and not easily aroused. On 3/31/25 at 1:00 PM, R32 was observed at table in the dining room with head on table and eyes closed. R32 was not easily aroused when name was called. On 04/01/25 at 2:06 PM, R32 was observed in dining room with head down on the table and eyes closed. On 4/1/25 the medical record for R32 was reviewed and revealed the following: R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmit date of 2/10/25 with multiple diagnoses including Dementia, Delusional Disorder, Depression, and Anxiety. A review of the minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the primary kitchen, the [NAME] house, and [NAME] house resulting in an increased potential for cross contamination of food and foodborne illness, potentially affecting 75 residents who receive meal services (2 nothing by mouth residents, or NPO) out of the facility's total census of 77 residents. Findings include: 1. On 2/13/24 between 9:45 AM, and 10:52 AM, the following non-food contact surfaces in the kitchen were observed soiled and with visible debris on their surfaces: On the flooring underneath the fryer, the top and sides of the fryer, and sides of the oven next to the fryer. On the ovens stainless steel backsplash. On the flooring throughout the transitional care unit's serving kitchen. Upon observation the surveyor inquired with Dietary Director, Staff N, on if they thought these areas were being cleaned timely and sufficiently to which they replied, not to my liking. On 2/13/24 at 10:53 AM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and sanitary environment for the facilities census of 77 residents and its staff resulting in an increased potential for harm. Findings include: On 2/13/24 at 10:36 AM, cracked window glass was observed in the transitional care units dining room. At this time the surveyor inquired with Dietary Director, Staff N, on the current state of the window to which they stated, I was unaware of it. I will let the maintenance staff and our Director of Nursing know about it right away. On 2/13/24 at 12:07 PM, the surveyor observed the broken glass on this window covered with cardboard and taped over on its edges. On 2/13/24 at 11:40 AM, in the [NAME] house, paper towels were observed not available for use at the dining rooms designated hand washing sink. On 2/13/24 at 11:42 AM, a visibly wet stack of paper towels was observed placed on a countertop next to the wall mounted paper towel dispenser adjacent to the kitchen's designated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R17) of three residents reviewed for dignity, were treated in a dignified manner during dining. Findings include: On 2/14/24 at 8:42 AM, R17 was observed in the dining area sitting in a reclined geri chair. Observed on the table in front of R17 was a covered plate. R17 was asked about their meal and was unable to be interviewed due to having a impaired cognition. On 2/14/24 at 12:16 PM, R17 was observed reclined in their geri chair with a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA C), feeding R17 fruit from a small bowl. CNA C was standing on the side of R17, feeding and leaning over towards R17. A review of R17's medical record noted, R17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease. A review of R17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed, R17 with a severely impaired cognition and total dependent of staff for eating assistance and other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean environment for one resident (R46) of one resident reviewed for homelike environment. Findings include: On 2/13/24 at 9:46 AM, R46 was observed lying in bed, a tube feeding pole was observed as visibly soiled, with dried tube feed formula observed dried and caked to the floor. The surrounding areas of R46's bed was observed to also have a dried yellow unknown substance underneath the bed, in addition to trash. Attempts to interview R46 were unsuccessful, as they were confused. On 2/13/24 at 1:58 PM, R46's room remained in the same condition as observed that morning. A review of R46's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Paraplegia, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Depression. Further review revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, and was totally dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living. On 2/14/24 at 9:37am, 11:50am, 12:29pm,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake: MI00136948. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin for one sampled resident (R34) of one resident reviewed for injury of unknown origin. Findings include: On 2/13/24 at 12:08 PM, R34 was observed sitting in their geri chair in the common area alert and confused. On 2/14/24 at 10:00 AM, an interview was completed with Confidential Witness M regarding R34's fractured femur, and they explained that the resident sustained a fractured femur April 2023, and explained that the facility didn't appear to have completed a thorough investigation regarding what occurred. A review of R34's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 9/20/20 with diagnoses that included Dementia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Anxiety. Further review revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance for Activities of Daily Living. Further review of the medical record revealed the following progress notes: 4/26/2023 22:33…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plan interventions to meet the needs for two residents (R46 and R74) of 19 residents reviewed for care planning. Findings include: On 2/13/24 at 9:46 AM, R46 was observed lying in bed without heel protectors on, or floor mats in place. Attempts to interview R46 were unsuccessful, and they were confused. On 2/13/24 at 1:58 PM, R46's room was observed without heel protector boots or floor mats observed in place. A review of R46's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Paraplegia, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Depression. Further review revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, and was totally dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living. Further review of R46's medical record revealed the following order: Order Summary: 6/1/23 Heel protector boots at all times. A review of R46's skin management care plan revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practices. Deficient Practice #1. This citation pertains to MI00142209. Resident R57 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident (R57) of three whose skin management was reviewed, was repositioned timely resulting resident distress and the potential for further skin tissue breakdown. Findings include: On 02/13/24 at 10:26 AM, 11:29 AM, 1:03 PM and R57 was observed to be in bed on their back in bed. A pillow was not observed to be at the side of the torso to turn R57 left or right. At 1:03 PM, a therapy staff exited the room, the head of the bed was up around 60 degrees. At 4:26 PM, a nurse was in the room to set up R57's tube feeding. R57 was observed to be on their back in bed uncovered without any pillows/device at the sides of the torso to turn the resident of their back. On 02/14/24 at 8:16 AM, R57 was observed to be on their back in bed. R57 moved their head around slowly but did not respond to queries. On 02/14/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide ancillary services related to a hearing impairment for one resident (R74) of one reviewed for hearing services. Findings include: On 2/13/24 at 1:31 PM, R74 was observed in their room lying down. Attempts to interview the resident were difficult due to their difficulty hearing the surveyor. R74 was asked if they had seen an audiologist since admission, and explained that they had not. A review of R74's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dysphagia following Cerebral Infarction, Acute Respiratory Failure, and Unspecified Hearing Loss, Left Ear. Additional review of the medical record revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, and according to their quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident's hearing was highly impaired. Further review of R74's medical record did not reveal a care plan for the resident's hearing loss. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe number of staff during a 2 person mechanical transfer with a Hoyer lift, as well as timely report and assess for potential injury for one resident (R30) of seven reviewed for accidents, resulting in pain in legs and feet. Findings include: On 2/13/24 at 12:11 PM, R30 indicated that their feet hurt after an incident with a hoyer lift. R30 continued and stated, they have not seen the doctor concerning the pain and would like an X-ray. On 2/14/24 at 9:56 AM, R30 was asked, when the incident happened. R30 stated, Three days ago. R30 reported Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) E was alone during the transfer with a Hoyer lift. R30 said, their feet got stuck during the transfer and it felt like the CNA was trying to break their feet off. R30 was asked if they reported the pain or the incident to a nurse and stated, The night nurse. On 2/15/24 at 7:58 AM, R30 was observed in bed and was asked how they were feeling and stated, My…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and document lab values for monitored medications (Digoxin and Keppra) and follow medication administration recommendations (for cholestyramine and Digoxin) for one of one residents (R46) reviewed for therapeutic medications. Findings include: A review of the facility medical record for R46 revealed R46 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with a re-admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heart rate) and Epilepsy. A review of the orders documented: an order dated 01/04/24 Digoxin oral tablet 125 mcg (micrograms) give one tablet one time a day . an order dated 04/12/23 Cholestyramine light packet 4 G (grams). Give one packet one time a day . and Levetiracetum (Keppra) oral solution 100 mg/ml (milligrams/milliliters). Give 20 ml every 12 hours . Review of the care plans revealed a care plan which addressed the monitoring of the Digoxin was not found. A review of the I have altered cardiovascular status . care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00139144. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor food allergies during a dining observation for one (R15) resident of 19 reviewed for dining. Findings include: On 2/13/24 at 12:34 PM, R15 was observed with their head down on the dining table. Observed in front of R15 was a cup of pink juice and a cup with a piece of uneaten frosted cake that had red fruit pieces baked into the cake. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA C) was observed to come to the table and to pick up the cake and juice and stated, Wait, is this strawberries? CNA C was observed to take away the cake and juice. CNA C was asked if R15 was able to have strawberries and stated, No. [R15] is allergic to a lot of things. CNA C was asked if R15 was allergic to strawberries and stated, Yes. CNA C was asked if the items were strawberries and stated, I am not sure. During an observation in the kitchen the frosted cake was confirmed that it was strawberry cake. On 2/15/24 at 8:17…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake MI00138500 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 9/5/23 between 10:30 AM-11:00 AM, during a tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manger (DM) A, the following items were observed: There was a personal cell phone charging next to the food processor on the food preparation counter. On the door leading into the kitchen, there was a sign posted that stated, No cell phones past this point. According to the 2017 FDA food code, Section 7-209.11 Storage, Except as specified under §§ 7-207.12 and 7-208.11, Employees shall store their personal care items in facilities as specified under 6-305.11(B), and Section 6-403.11 Designated Areas, .(B) Lockers or other suitable facilities shall be located in a designated room or area where contamination of food, equipment, utensils, linens, and single-service and single use articles can not occur. The black rolling cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00138500 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide comfortable, warm water temperatures in rooms 5,7, 13, 21, and Shower RM [ROOM NUMBER], and failed to provide a functional sink and home-like environment in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Findings include: On 9/5/23 at 11:00 AM, hot water temperatures were measured with Maintenance Supervisor B with the following results: room [ROOM NUMBER]: 95 degrees Fahrenheit room [ROOM NUMBER]: 85 degrees Fahrenheit room [ROOM NUMBER]: 85 degrees Fahrenheit room [ROOM NUMBER]: 93 degrees Fahrenheit Shower room [ROOM NUMBER]: 93 degrees Fahrenheit. On 9/5/23 at 11:15 AM, the facility boilers and hot water tanks were observed. Maintenance Supervisor B stated the boiler was functioning because the red light was illuminated, but was unsure of the water temperature in the hot water tanks, and stated the building did not have a mixing valve. On 9/5/23 at 1:30 PM, the running water at the bathroom sink in room [ROOM NUMBER] was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ORCHARDS MICHIGAN — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LOVELACE, JUANIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/01/2021
PICKETT, CYLEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/01/2021

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 55%Medicare 6%Other / private 40%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$406per resident / day
operating cost
$12,345per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$361per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235014. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next