No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Orchards at Three Rivers

55378 Wilbur Rd, Three Rivers, MI 49093 · For profit - Corporation · 87 certified beds · (269) 279-7441 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0605) — cited Oct 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0741, F0744)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$137,535 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0605), cited Oct 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (70) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $137,535 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-30)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
16587 Enterprise Dr · (269) 279-6700 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
808 W Michigan Ave · (269) 278-2355 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
53056 N US-131 · (269) 279-7986 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
55437 Wilbur Rd · (269) 279-6261

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased26.2%10.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.3%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.8%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.5%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened26.6%12.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.5%19.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.4%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.8%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.4%20.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.2%14.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.2%79.5%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.8%24.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.1%11.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.141.841.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.121.641.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.02hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.5%CMS range 45.4–62.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 8.1–17.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge46.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified88.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting76.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.1%CMS range 3.1–14.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.761.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.46
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.97
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.38
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
48.1%
Total nursing turnover
72.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 87 beds and averages 75.3 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-05)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-15)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

70 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 57 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number: 2640123Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the use of psychotropic medications without adequate indication for use and without resident monitoring in one (R102) of two residents reviewed for psychotropic medications, resulting in an immediate jeopardy when beginning on 9/16/25, R102 was prescribed psychotropic medications, who then experienced increased sedation, weight loss, and decreased ability to communicate. Findings include:Resident #102 (R102) was prescribed Haldol solution injection intramuscular (IM) daily as needed PRN and Olanzapine (Zyprexa) 5mg by mouth (PO) daily at night beginning 9/16/25. The Olanzapine was increased to 10 mg PO daily at night on 10/20/25. R102 experienced falls, some with injuries, beginning 9/16/25 after having no falls since 9/11/25 admission. Resident #102 did not have a psychiatric diagnosis to indicate the need for two psychotropic medications. On 10/22/25, R102 was observed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes #2658740, #2635653 and #2671515Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to reduce hazards for 5 residents (Resident #103, Resident #106, Resident #107, Resident #108, and Resident #101) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in: 1. Resident #103 suffering a second degree burn when she was provided hot coffee without being assessed for her ability to manage a hot beverage and Resident #106, #107 and #108 being given a hot beverage without being assessed for their ability to safety handle it. 2. Resident #101 experiencing multiple falls due to a lack of monitoring for effectiveness of interventions and modification of interventions.Findings include:Resident #103Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #103 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: altered mental status (a change in a person's cognitive status), muscle weakness, and cognitive communication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes MI00142592 and MI00142727. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess an acute change of condition in 1 of 4 residents (R102) and failed to provide appropriate skin care for open wounds in 1 of 4 residents (R103) reviewed for quality of care, resulting in a delay in assessment, treatment and subsequent hospitalization for for dehydration and hypernatremia (elevated sodium) for R102 and the potential for infection for R103. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), [DATE], R102 was reported to have a memory problem with her cognitive skills for daily decision making severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 1/15. Her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and adult failure to thrive. Review of R102's Order Summary [DATE]-[DATE], reported for 14-days, the resident was placed on droplet isolation and was to remain in room with the door closed for Covid-19 exposure. Review of R102's Advance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to A.) operationalize an effective infection control program B.) have an active plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP) C.) follow transmission-based precaution (TBP) and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) guidelines for 4 (Resident #7, #54, #35, and #87) residents resulting in the potential for the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Findings include: Resident #7 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #7 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included need for assistance with personal care and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #7' Orders revealed, Enhanced Barrier Precautions r/t (related to) tube feeding (delivery of nutrients directly into the gastrointestinal tract through a feeding tube). Start date: 3/3/26. Review of Resident #7's February Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an orderly and clean living environment was maintained for 8 (Residents #30, 74, 87, 50, 70, 40, 41, and 2) of 8 residents reviewed for environment resulting in a dirty living environment and being dissatisfied with the level of cleanliness and order.Findings include: Resident #30: Review of Resident #30's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated Resident #30 was admitted on [DATE] and her brief interview for mental status score was 13 which indicated she was cognitively intact. During an observation and interview on 03/03/2026 at 10:40 AM, Resident #30 reported that she thought her window glass was cracked and covered in tape. The window glass had an approximately 55-inch-long streak of old dried-up tape and tape residue extending from the top of the window down towards the bottom. Resident #30 reported the tape had been on the window since she was admitted . The window was not shattered but was partially covered in old tape and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% in 2 of 4 residents (Resident #33 and #54) reviewed for medication administration, when wrong dosages of medications were administered, and medications that were not to be crushed were administered crushed, resulting in the potential for adverse medication side effects. Findings include:Resident #33 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #33 was a female, with pertinent diagnoses which included heart failure, diabetes, heart disease, cognitive communication deficit (impaired communication due to underlying cognitive issues), anemia (a deficiency of healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin), depression, high blood pressure, kidney failure, and muscle weakness. In an observation and interview on 3/4/26 at 9:03 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) I prepared scheduled medications for Resident #33. LPN I reported Resident #33 takes all her medications crushed in pudding due to difficulty swallowing pills. Observed LPN I prepare one tablet of Vitamin D3 125 mcg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate an Infection Preventionist (IP) that had adequate time to perform infection prevention responsibilities and oversee the infection control program. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for the spread of infection, cross-contamination, and disease transmission for all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 3/04/2026 at 1:35 PM, Infection Preventionist (IP) D reported that she had been overseeing the Infection Control program at the facility for the last month. IP D provided the facility's Line Listings (List of residents with potential infections) for January 2026, and some of February 2026, and reported she had not yet completed the facility's line listings for the month of February 2026. IP D reported that her process for providing infection surveillance for the facility was to review resident progress notes daily to oversee potential resident infections, but she was not always able to as she was also working as the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) and Unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility to failed to ensure call lights were within reach for 1 (Resident #7) of18 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #7 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #7 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included need for assistance with personal care and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #7's Care Plan revealed, (Resident #7) is at risk for falls r/t (related to) impulsiveness, TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury), agitation, weakness, confusion, history of falls, poor judgement and lacks insight into limitations . Date initiated: 12/31/24 . Interventions: . Clip call light on resident when he is in bed as he allows (post fall 11/15/25). Date initiated: 11/17/25 .Replace call light clip (post fall 12/15/25). Date initiated:12/18/25 .soft touch (type of call light device) call light in reach. Date initiated: 1/6/25 . Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake # 2749154. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the responsible party of a change in resident condition in 1 of 1 resident (Resident #41) reviewed for notification of changes, resulting in the family/responsible party being unaware of a newly identified urinary tract infection and initiation of antibiotic treatment. Findings include:Resident #41 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #41 was a female, with pertinent diagnoses which included dementia, need for assistance with personal care, depression, cognitive communication deficit (impaired communication due to underlying cognitive issues), and muscle weakness. Noted Family Member U was Resident #41's Power of Attorney (POA) for care, first emergency contact, and responsible party. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #41, with a reference date of 12/4/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 4, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. In an interview on 3/3/26 at 8:00 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Notice of Transfer and Bed Hold documentation was provided in writing prior to transfer from facility for 1 (Resident #3) of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization, resulting in the potential for the resident or resident representative to be uninformed of rights related to transfer to hospital and bed hold policy.Findings include: Resident #3Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #3 was a male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: end stage renal disease (the final stage of renal disease where the kidneys can no longer function to sustain life without treatment), dependence on renal dialysis (a medical treatment that removes waste products, excess fluids, and toxins from the blood when the kidneys are unable to perform these functions) and dementia (a syndrome characterized by a decline in cognitive function, affecting memory, thinking, behavior, and the ability to perform…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for medication administration in 1 of 4 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for medication administration, resulting in medications being crushed against pharmacy recommendations and the potential for adverse medication side effects. Findings include:Resident #33Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #33 was a female, with pertinent diagnoses which included heart failure, diabetes, heart disease, cognitive communication deficit (impaired communication due to underlying cognitive issues), anemia (a deficiency of healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin), depression, high blood pressure, kidney failure, and muscle weakness.In an observation and interview on 3/4/26 at 9:03 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) I prepared scheduled medications for Resident #33. LPN I reported Resident #33 takes all her medications crushed in pudding due to difficulty swallowing pills. Observed LPN I prepare one Metoprolol Succinate ER (Extended Release) 25 mg (milligrams) tablet, one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and implement pressure ulcer preventative care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 1 (Resident #7) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention and treatment, resulting in the potential for the development of an pressure ulcer and potential for worsening of pressure wounds, and overall deterioration in health status. Findings include:Resident #7Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #7 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included need for assistance with personal care and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #7's Braden Assessment (evidence-based tool used by healthcare professionals to assess a patient's risk of developing pressure injuries) dated 1/7/26 indicated that Resident #7 scored a 12 on the assessment, indicating that he was high risk for developing a pressure injury. Review of Resident #7's Progress Note dated 2/11/26 revealed, Left heel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate care for residents who received enteral nutrition (delivery of nutrients directly into the gastrointestinal tract through a feeding tube) in 1 (Resident #7) of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding, resulting in the potential for aspiration pneumonia. Findings include: Resident #7 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #7 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included dysphagia following a cerebral infarction (difficulty swallowing after a stroke) and pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit (lung inflammation caused by aspirating food, liquid, or gastric contents into the airways). Review of Resident #7's Orders revealed, Enteral Feed Order: Every shift for nutrition. Jevity (type of enteral feed formula) 1.5 continuous feed at 50ml/hr (milliliters per hour). Review of Resident #7's Care Plan revealed, (Resident #7) is dependent on tube feeding (device used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 57 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain oxygen equipment in a sanitary manner and follow physician's oxygen orders for 1 (Resident #87) of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care resulting in the potential for excessive oxygen levels and/or an infection.Findings include:Review of Resident #87's admission Record, print date 3/5/26, indicated she was readmitted on [DATE] and had a power of attorney (authorized person to make decisions for another individual) for medical care. The admission record included medical diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure, other disorders of lung, and other forms of dyspnea (shortness of breath). Review of Resident #87's physician order for oxygen, dated 2/23/26, stated, Oxygen @ 2L (at 2 Liters per minute) via NC (nasal cannula/oxygen tubing) .During an observation on 03/03/2026 at 11:17 AM, Resident #87 was in her bed receiving supplemental oxygen from the bedside oxygen concentrator at a flow rate of 2 liters per minute. Resident #87's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in 2 of 18 residents (Resident #61 & #7) reviewed for accuracy of medical records, resulting in inaccurate code status information within the electronic health record and missing documentation in the treatment record with the potential for advanced directive/code status preferences to not be honored and deterioration in resident status.Findings include:Resident #61 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #61 was a female, with pertinent diagnoses which included high blood pressure, paraplegia (impairment or loss of motor and sensory function in the lower half of the body), muscle weakness, depression, anxiety, and chronic kidney disease. Noted Resident #61 was her own responsible party. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #61, with a reference date of [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, out of a total possible score of 15, indicating she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they educated, offered and administered COVID-19 vaccines or maintained valid declination in the medical record for 1(Resident #87) of 5 residents reviewed for Covid-19 immunizations resulting in the increased likelihood of severe infection and complications/death related to COVID-19. Findings include:Resident #87 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #87 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included pneumonia (an infection that inflames the air sacs in one or both lungs) and pulmonary hypertension (condition characterized by high blood pressure in the lungs' arteries, causing the right side of the heart to work too hard, leading to weakening and potential failure). Review of Resident #87's Immunization Record revealed, SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19)-Dose 2. Date administered: (there was no date indicated). Status: Pending historical . During an interview on 3/04/2026 at 10:22 AM, Infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain best practices in accordance with professional standards of food service safety. The deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen.Findings include: In an observation and interview on 12/17/25 at 11:43 AM, within the main kitchen, noted Dietary Services Aide MM standing beside the tray line (with lunch service in progress) with no hair net or hair restraint worn. Dietary Services Aide MM reported the lunch today was fried chicken, mashed potatoes and gravy and carrots, with rice and pork (leftover from 12/16/25) available as alternate menu items. Observed the stated food items were present in trays on the steam table. In an observation and interview on 12/17/25 at 11:53 AM, lunch service was in progress for the main dining room. Noted the leftover pork that had been reheated and placed in a tray on the steam table to serve as an alternative menu item.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake 2689916.Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and failed to implement effective corrective interventions for known issues involving staffing and meal service, with the potential to impact all residents who reside at the facility, resulting in insufficient staff to meet resident needs and poor food quality.Findings include:Refer to noncompliance cited at F677, F725, and F804.In an interview on 12/16/25 at 12:09 PM, Resident #103 stated in regard to staffing .we have no help in here at all. The aides are great, but they are overworked . Resident #103 reported she experienced long call light wait times, especially on third shift. Resident #103 reported staff will often respond to the call light and turn the light off, saying they will be back later, but .they don't come back . Resident #103 reported call light wait times as long as an hour. Resident #103 reported some days she was unable to get up in her power chair because there were not enough staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake # 2670974, 2689916, & 2646054.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, homelike environment in 3 of 5 residents (Resident #102, #103, & #108) reviewed for a safe/clean environment, resulting in refusal of care due to uncomfortable water temperatures and dissatisfaction with the living conditions.Findings include:Resident #102 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #102 was a male, with pertinent diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease (a progressive brain disorder affecting movement), major depression, legal blindness, need for assistance with personal care, dementia, and anxiety. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #102, with a reference date of 11/7/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, indicating he was cognitively intact. In an interview on 12/16/25 at 12:50 PM, Resident #102 reported he does not receive his showers as scheduled, partly due to issues with the facility not having…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake # 2670974 & 2689916.Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure showers/baths were provided per resident preference and plan of care in in 4 of 7 residents (Resident #101, #102, #103, & #113) reviewed for showers/bathing, resulting in dissatisfaction with the care provided and the potential for discomfort and feelings of impaired self-worth.Findings include:Personal hygiene affects patients' comfort, safety, and well-being. Hygiene care includes cleaning and grooming activities that maintain personal body cleanliness and appearance. Personal hygiene activities such as taking a bath or shower and brushing and flossing the teeth also promote comfort and relaxation, foster a positive self-image, promote healthy skin, and help prevent infection and disease. [NAME], [NAME] A.; [NAME], [NAME] Griffin; Stockert, [NAME]; Hall, [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing - E-Book (Kindle Locations 50742-50744). Elsevier Health Sciences. Kindle Edition.Resident #101Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake # 2670974, 2689916, 2646054, 2639254, & 2693899.Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident needs in 4 of 6 residents (Resident #102, #103, #108, & #109) reviewed for sufficient staffing and timely response to resident needs, resulting in long call light wait times, missed showers, and the potential for unmet needs.Findings include:Resident #102Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #102 was a male, with pertinent diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease, major depression, legal blindness, need for assistance with personal care, dementia, and anxiety.Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #102, with a reference date of 11/7/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, indicating he was cognitively intact.In an interview on 12/16/25 at 12:50 PM, Resident #102 reported he does not receive his showers as scheduled, partly due to issues with the facility not having enough hot water. Resident #102…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake # 2689916.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu and serve food items from the menu as scheduled, post the current menu for residents to review, and update the menu with changes when they occurred, in 1 of 8 residents (Resident #103) reviewed for food, with the potential to affect all residents who receive meals from the kitchen, resulting in frustration with the food service process and the potential for decreased intake.Findings include:Resident #103 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #103 was a female, with pertinent diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (a neurological disorder affecting movement, posture, and coordination), major depression, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #103, with a reference date of 12/3/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, indicating she was cognitively intact. In an interview on 12/16/25 at 12:09 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake # 2670974, 2689916, 2671774, 2667436, 2646054, 2639254, 2599079, 2693899, & 2693872.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate portions of palatable food, served at an appetizing temperature in 8 of 9 residents (Resident #102, #103, #105, #108, #109, #110, #111, & #113) reviewed for food quality, resulting in dissatisfaction with the meals served, frustration with the food service process, and the potential for decreased meal intake and weight loss.Findings include:In an interview on 12/17/25 at 10:03 AM, Ombudsman FF reported she had received many complaints from residents and family members regarding the quality of the food served at the facility and small portion sizes. Resident #102 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #102 was a male, with pertinent diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease (a progressive brain disorder affecting movement), major depression, legal blindness, need for assistance with personal care, dementia, and anxiety. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #2690782Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent for psychotropic medications for 1 (Resident #106) of 3 residents reviewed for notification of change resulting in lack of communication and/or education to the resident/resident representative for initiation and/or dose changes of psychotropic medications.Findings include:In an interview on 12/16/25 at 2:34 PM, Family Member HH reported she was not notified regarding changes to Resident #106's medications. Family Member HH stated .He has been put on medications that I knew nothing about . Family Member HH reported she recently learned that Resident #106 had been prescribed and was taking Seroquel (generic name quetiapine - an antipsychotic medication) and they are currently in the process of discontinuing that medication. Family Member HH reported Resident #106 did not take Seroquel prior to his admission to the facility, and stated .I did not know he was on it . Family Member HH…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake # 2677000 & 2693899.Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure ordered medications were administered timely per physician orders in 2 of 8 residents (Resident #107 & #114) reviewed for quality of care, resulting in a delay of care, and the potential for worsened infection, increased seizure activity, and impaired health status.Findings include:Review of the policy/procedure Medication Administration and General Guidelines, dated 11/2022, revealed .Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician .Resident #107Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #107 was a male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory problem resulting in reduced blood flow to the limbs), heart failure, left foot ulcer, bacteremia (presence of bacteria in the bloodstream), chronic pain, high blood pressure, left leg atherosclerosis (plaque buildup inside the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2663418Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to report injuries of unknown origin to the State Agency in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #100) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse and reporting, resulting in the potential for ongoing mistreatment to go unrecognized.Findings include:Resident #100Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #100 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: alzheimer's disease (disease causing progressive decline in cognitive skills), cognitive communication deficit (communication challenge caused by impaired thinking skills), and fracture of nasal bones.Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #100 with a reference date of 10/29/25, revealed Resident #100 was rarely to never understood and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) could not be conducted. Section GG revealed Resident #100 was dependent for rolling in bed and transferring from bed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes #2663418, # 2648487, 2648458, 2645961, and #2671459Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an incident of potential mistreatment for 4 (Resident #100, Resident #102, Resident #104, and Resident #109) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse resulting in the potential for mistreatment to go unrecognized and resolved.Findings include:Resident #100Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #100 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: alzheimer's disease (disease causing progressive decline in cognitive skills), cognitive communication deficit (communication challenge caused by impaired thinking skills), and fracture of nasal bones (9/18/25).Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #100 with a reference date of 10/29/25, revealed Resident #100 was rarely to never understood and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) could not be conducted. Section GG revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-25 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — pattern
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 6 staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) G, CNA TT, CNA Z, CNA G, CNA UU and Registered Nurse (RN) BB ) of 6 staff reviewed for behavioral competency, had the appropriate skills needed to provide care in a manner that supported each resident's psychosocial wellness, resulting in the potential for inappropriate staff to resident interactions, inability of staff to appropriately address residents in psychological distress, unmet care needs, and resident not maintaining or achieving highest practical psycho-social wellbeing. Findings include:In an interview on 11/20/25 at 9:24am, CNA P reported she struggled to successfully care for several residents in the memory care unit of the facility. CNA P reported working in memory care was her least favorite hall because she did not know how to care for the resident's without triggering their stress responses. CNA P stated I say I'm sorry to residents back there more than anywhere else in the building because they get so upset.In an interview on 11/20/25 at 1:58pm,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes #2663418Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize its abuse policy and procedure for 1 resident (Resident #100) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in potential abuse not being reported to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) immediately.Findings include:Resident #100Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #100 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: alzheimer's disease (disease causing progressive decline in cognitive skills), cognitive communication deficit (communication challenge caused by impaired thinking skills), and fracture of nasal bones.Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #100 with a reference date of 10/29/25, revealed Resident #100 was rarely to never understood and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) could not be conducted. Section GG revealed Resident #100 was dependent for rolling in bed and transferring from bed to wheelchair.Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2671515Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate first aid care for a burn for 1 (Resident #103) of 3 residents reviewed for professional standards, resulting in Resident #103 (who suffered a second-degree burn) receiving inappropriate treatment and a potential for worsening of the injury because of the care provided. Findings include:Resident #103Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #103 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: altered mental status (a change in a person's cognitive status), muscle weakness, and cognitive communication deficit (communication challenge caused by impaired thinking skills), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition in which the body does not produce enough insulin resulting in high blood sugar levels).Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #103 with a reference date of 10/1/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2663418Based on interview and record review the facility failed to promptly recognize and assess 1 resident (Resident #100) of 3 reviewed for quality of care, resulting in Resident #100, who had new symptoms of unknown head trauma, not being properly assessed for 5 days, and a potential for care needs to go unmet. Findings include:Resident #100Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #100 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: alzheimer's disease (disease causing progressive decline in cognitive skills), cognitive communication deficit (communication challenge caused by impaired thinking skills), and fracture of nasal bones (9/18/25).Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #100 with a reference date of 10/29/25, revealed Resident #100 was rarely to never understood and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) could not be conducted.Review of a Care Plan for Resident #100 with a reference date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-30 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete annual performance reviews for 3 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) (CNA's T, X, and KK) of 3 reviewed for regular performance evaluations, resulting in the potential for unidentified CNA performance concerns, a lack of training related to staff performance review outcomes, and the potential for unmet care needs.Findings include:In an email sent to Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A on 10/30/25 at 8:12am, annual performance reviews were requested for CNA's T, X and KK.Review of personnel files for CNA's T, X, and KK revealed no annual reviews were present for the past 12 months. Further review of the employee files revealed all CNA's had been employed by the facility for more than 12 months.In an interview on 10/30/25 at 12:51pm, Business Office Manager (BOM) BB reported every nursing assistant should have a performance review done at least every 12 months and the evaluation should be kept in the employee file. BOM BB reviewed the employee files for CNA T, X and KK and confirmed no performance reviews completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-30 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program identified and corrected quality deficiencies, resulting in decreased quality of care.Findings include:Review of a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement(QAPI) policy with a reference date of 6/2025 revealed Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life and addresses all the care and unique services the facility provides.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: The QAPI program includes.a written QAPI Plan. The QAA (Quality Assessment and Assurance) Committee shall. consist of a minimum of.The Medical Director/designee.implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies.regularly review and analyze data.At a minimum, the QAPI program will: address all systems of care and management practices.Considerations include, but are not limited to: Certain classes of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-30 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the medical director or their designee attended Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings at least quarterly, resulting in the potential for the decline in overall medical care provided and decreased oversight of the implementation of resident care throughout the facility.Findings include:Review of the facility's QAPI committee sign-in sheets revealed neither the medical director nor their designee physically or virtually attended a committee meeting from April-August 2025. In an interview on 10/30/25 at 3:16pm, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A reported the facility had a large turnover in within the management team since April 2025 and as a result QAPI had not been running smoothly. NHA A reported the facility also changed Medical Directors in April and the former Medical Director did not attend QAPI as required. NHA A reported the new Medical Director was agreeable to attending but needed to have it scheduled in advance and that initially lead to them not attending the meeting as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-30 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective training program which included training in resident rights, quality assurance, infection control, compliance and ethics, and communication for all existing employees, resulting in the potential for decreased resident safety for all residents who resided in the facility.Findings include:In an interview on 10/30/25 at 12:47pm, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported the facility used a computer-based training platform for staff training for a portion of the year but after the facility opted to stop using the platform/paying for the service, it was no longer able to access record of any training the staff had completed. DON B reported there was no current staff training program in place.In an interview on 10/30/25 at 1:14pm, DON B reported any training the staff completed would be recorded in their employee file.Review of employee files for CNA T, X and KK revealed no training related to the QAPI program, Infection Control, Compliance and Ethics, Communication or Resident Rights in the last 12 months.In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-30 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective in-service training program for nurse aides that supported mandatory nurse aide attendance, tracked participation, and ensured continuing competence for 3 Certified Nurse Aides (identified as CNAs T, X, and KK) of 3 CNAs whose in-service training files were reviewed, resulting in the potential for unmet resident care needs. Findings include:Review of a Nurse Aide Training Program policy with a reference date of 10/28/25 revealed Policy: The facility maintains an appropriate and effective nurse aide in-service training program for the purpose of ensuring the continuing competence of nurse aides. In an email on 10/29/25 at 3:28pm, documentation of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) in-service training for the last 12 months was requested for CNA T, X and KK.In an interview on 10/30/25 at 12:47pm, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported the facility had been without a staff educator and she was trying to cover the responsibilities of that role. DON B reported she was working on developing a staff training…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for 1 of 2 residents (R102) reviewed for accommodation of needs, resulting in the potential for residents to not meet their highest practicable level of well-being.Findings include:According to R102's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs).Observations:-10/20/25 at 3:15 PM a round soft-touch call light was under the sheet to the left side of R102's bed approximately waist level to the resident.- 10/21/25 at 8:12 AM, R102 eyes closed in bed. Soft touch call light clipped to fitted sheet at head of bed, out of sight and reach of resident.-10/21/25 at 10:05 AM, R102 eyes closed in bed. Soft touch call light clipped to fitted sheet at head of bed, out of sight and reach of resident.-10/21/25 at 3:20 PM, R102 was lying in the fetal position on his left side in bed. Call light positioned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide resident centered activities designed to support leisure needs for 1 (Resident #102) of 3 residents reviewed for activities, resulting in the potential for decreased physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings include:Review of The Needs of Older People with Dementia in Residential Care, [NAME] G. A. Woods B. [NAME] D., & [NAME] M. (2006). Published by in the International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 43-49. doi:10.1002/gps.1421 revealed Determining which activities have high degrees of meaningfulness can aide recreation staff in creating programs more likely to promote health and wellness for persons with dementia.Resident #102Review of an admission Record revealed Resident # 102 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbance(a type of brain disorder that causes cognitive decline due to damage to the blood vessels in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-30 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number: 2640123Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement person centered dementia care interventions to address wandering, disorientation, and frustration for 1 (Resident #102) of 3 residents reviewed for dementia care, resulting in Resident #102 experiencing ongoing wandering, emotional frustration, and stress.Findings include:Review of The Unmet Needs Model, [NAME]-[NAME] and [NAME] (1995), revealed that those with dementia develop problem behaviors from an imbalance in the interaction between life-long habits and personality, current physical and mental states and less than optimal environmental conditions. Resident #102 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #102 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbance (a type of brain disorder that causes cognitive decline due to damage to the blood vessels in the brain). Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number: 2640123Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record in 1 of 3 residents (Resident #102) reviewed for comprehensive/accurate medical records, resulting in inaccurate documentation and the potential for unmet needs.Findings include:Resident #102Review of an admission Record revealed Resident # 102 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbance(a type of brain disorder that causes cognitive decline due to damage to the blood vessels in the brain), adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct(maladaptive response to psychological stressor), and other sequalae of cerebral infarction (long term complications of a stroke).Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #102 with a reference date of 9/17/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-04 · tag F0659 — pattern
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff was adequately trained and evaluated for competencies specifically related to administration of Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) (a procedure that removes excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys cannot perform these functions) in 5 (Resident #2, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, and Resident #11) of 5 residents reviewed for PD, resulting in the potential for unsafe administration of PD, unrecognized complications, increased risk for infection and adverse reactions.Findings include:Resident #2Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #2 was a female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: end stage renal disease (chronic condition where the kidney can no longer function to meet the needs of the body to removed excess water, solutes and toxins) and dependence on renal dialysis.Resident #8Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #8 was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1). pre and post dialysis treatment assessments were completed; 2). administration of peritoneal dialysis (PD)(a procedure that removes excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys cannot perform these functions) was administered by qualified trained staff; 3). ongoing assessments and/or monitoring were completed during the administration of peritoneal dialysis; 4). ongoing communication between the facility and the dialysis facility (Name Omitted) was documented; and 5). administration of peritoneal dialysis per physician orders occurred for 5 (Resident #2, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, and Resident #11) of 5 residents reviewed for peritoneal dialysis resulting in the potential for staff being unprepared for a decline in resident condition related to dialysis treatment, unrecognized adverse reactions, and the potential for improper technique/unsafe administration of peritoneal dialysis treatment.Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-04 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer its policies and procedures in a manner that displayed effective and efficient use of resources to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 5 (Resident #2, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, and Resident #11) of 5 residents reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in 8 staff members administering treatments to Resident #2, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, and Resident #11, they were neither trained nor qualified to administer.Findings include:Resident #2Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #2 was a female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: end stage renal disease (chronic condition where the kidney can no longer function to meet the needs of the body to removed excess water, solutes and toxins) and dependence on renal dialysis.Resident #8Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #8 was a female…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to 1). implement gait belt use for safety during ambulation (walking) of one resident (Resident #5) and 2). ensure safe transport of a resident in a wheelchair with footrests in place in 1 (Resident #6) of 3 residents reviewed for safety, resulting in the potential for an accident, and/or an injury to occur during ambulation and transport.Findings include:Resident #5Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #5 was a female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur (a break in the thigh bone in the area where hip stability and mobility occurs).On 7/29/25 at 10:11 am, Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) LL was observed assisting Resident #5 to walk in the hallway between the therapy room and Resident #5's room. PTA LL was not using a gait belt.In an interview on 7/29/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store narcotic medications in a secure manner resulting in the potential for residents, visitors, and/or staff to access the medication in the facility with a current census of 82 residents. Findings include:On 7/30/2025 at 10:05 am, a plastic medication cup with a name written in black on the side of it, containing a white substance submerged in liquid, was observed sitting on top of the medication cart next to a plastic drinking cup of tan colored liquid in the common area in the secure unit of the facility. At this time there were 7 residents in the room, 1 resident was walking around the room, and 1 CNA was noted to be sitting at a table in the room with her back to the medication cart. No other staff member was present in the room, or near the cart, nor did any staff member have the medication cart or medication within their line of sight.In an interview on 7/30/2025 at 10:10 am, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) GG reported that she had nothing to do with medications. When CNA GG was queried…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper infection control protocols and practices as evidenced by: 1). The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during personal care and transfers for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #7) of 2 residents requiring enhanced barrier precautions, 2. Sanitize resident shared equipment during uses, resulting in increased potential for the spread of infection, bacterial harborage, cross contamination, and disease transmission for residents residing in the facility. Findings include:Resident #2Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #2 was a female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: end stage renal disease (chronic condition where the kidney can no longer function to meet the needs of the body to removed excess water, solutes and toxins) and dependence on renal dialysis.During an observation on 7/29/2025 at 2:00 pm, signage was noted displayed outside of Resident #2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-03 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake MI00151744 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the dietary manager had adequate competencies and skill set to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service resulting in potential for unmet nutrition and hydration needs for all residents who rely on food and hydration from the facility kitchen. Findings include: During an initial tour of the kitchen on 4/2/25 at 9:45 am, Dietary Aide (DA) W and X along with Dietary Cook (DC) Y and AA all reported the food delivery that occurred the day before only included milk, eggs, and a few loaves of bread. DA W reported there was food in the pantry, refrigerator, and freezer that could be served to the residents, but it may not be what was on the menu to be served. DC Y was noted to be visibly upset, crying, and reported today's lunch menu was supposed to be ravioli, and that she had to use the ravioli from the emergency food supply. DC Y reported she had used beef stew from the emergency food supply last week and it had not been replaced yet. DC Y reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake MI00151744 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow menus resulting in the potential for inadequate nutritional value, unequal substituted nutritional value, and unmet nutritional needs. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents who consume food from the facility kitchen. Findings include: During an initial tour of the kitchen on 4/2/25 at 9:45 am, Dietary Aide (DA) W and X along with Dietary Cook (DC) Y and AA all reported the food delivery that occurred the day before only included milk, eggs, and bread. DA W reported there was food in the pantry, refrigerator, and freezer that could be served to the residents, but it may not be what was on the menu to be served. DC Y was noted to be visibly upset, crying, and reported there was no sausage and gravy nor biscuits to be served this morning for breakfast. DC Y reported the menu for breakfast tomorrow included French toast and bacon, but there was not enough bread or bacon to fulfill the menu items for all the residents. DC Y reported she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a qualified Infection Preventionist worked at least part-time at the facility, was provided sufficient time to perform the Infection Preventionist role, and was present to properly assess, implement, and manage the Infection Prevention and Control Program. Findings include: During an interview on 4/2/25 at 8:52 am, Assistant Director of Nursing/Unit Manager/ Infection Preventionist (ADON/UM/IP) D reported she educates on enhanced barrier precautions, (EBP) but staff was not compliant with wearing personal protective equipment (PPE). ADON/UM/IP D reported she does perform audits on residents who are in EBP, but the audit was for gown and glove supply availability, not use by staff. ADON/UM/IP D reported she was now the unit manager on the rehab unit in addition to being the ADON and IP. ADON/UM/IP D reported she was also pulled to work the floor and cover open shift or parts of shift weekly. ADON/UM/IP D reported she was on call one weekend a month and was usually called into the building to work during her on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop person centered care plans for 1 (Resident #104) of 9 residents reviewed for person centered care plans resulting in an inaccurate reflection of the resident's current care needs and the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #104 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #104 was male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: psychotic disorder with delusions and dementia with behavioral disturbances. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #104, with a reference date of 1/10/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7/15 which indicated Resident #104 was severely cognitively impaired, (BIMS score 0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment). During an observation on 3/31/25 at 8:35 am, Resident #104 was in his wheelchair in the hallway, wearing shorts, and the tubing to a foley catheter was noted along the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise person centered care plan for 1 (Resident #106) for 9 residents reviewed for person centered care plans resulting in an inaccurate and incomplete description of resident current care needs and the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #106 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #106 was a male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #106, with a reference date of 1/23/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1/15 which indicated Resident #106 was severely cognitively impaired (BIMS score 0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment). In an interview on 3/31/25 Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A reported that Resident #106's diet was recently advanced and Resident #106's feeding tube (G-tube, tube inserted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00148764 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) to dependent residents, specifically showers to 2 (Resident #101 and Resident #102) of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living and showers, resulting in showers not being given as scheduled. Findings include: Resident #101 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 was a female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: cerebral palsy (a disorder that affects movement and muscle tone) and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #101, with a reference date of 3/7/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #105 was cognitively intact (BIMS score 12-15 indicates no cognitive impairment). In an interview on 3/31/25 at 8:32 am, Resident #101 reported she went a week and a half without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes MI00150708, MI00150714, and MI00151319. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for safety for 3 (Resident #104, Resident #105, and Resident #106) of 3 residents reviewed for supervision resulting in Resident #105 hitting Resident #104, Resident #105 spitting on Resident #104 and Resident #106 eloping (exit without supervision) from the building. Findings include: Resident #104 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #104 was male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: psychotic disorder with delusions and dementia with behavioral disturbances. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #104, with a reference date of 1/10/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7/15 which indicated Resident #104 was severely cognitively impaired, (BIMS score 0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment). Resident #105 Review of an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for residents in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 2 (Resident #104 and Resident #106) of 4 residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions personal protective equipment use, resulting in the potential for introduction of infection, disease transmission, and cross contamination. Findings include: Resident #104 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #104 was male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: psychotic disorder with delusions and dementia with behavioral disturbances and need for assistance with personal care. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #104, with a reference date of 1/10/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7/15 which indicated Resident #104 was severely cognitively impaired, (BIMS score 0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment). During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 73 residents. Findings include: During an observation of the 100 hall soiled utility room, at 1:38 PM on 11/13/24, an interview with Maintenance Director (MD) Z found that the facility was in the process of taking out the hoppers that staff no longer use and have been removing stagnant and dead end lines in the process. When asked if minimal use or unused fixtures are flushed, MD Z stated that flushing happens with housekeeping and myself. During an interview with MD Z regarding the Water Management Plan (WMP), at 2:05 PM on 11/13/24, it was found that the facility used to send water samples to be tested for legionella, but it hasn't happened in a year or two. When asked if they are currently sampling for anything, MD Z stated no. Observation of the Meadowlane Spa room, at 2:37 PM on 11/13/24, found that a black wooden column…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain general cleanliness and repair of the premises. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in the satisfaction of living. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 73 residents. Findings include: During a tour of the kitchen, at 11:00 AM on 11/13/24, it was observed that the three compartment sink and the one compartment sink on the preparation table, were both found to be directly connected to the wastewater drain with no air gap present. When asked what they use the one compartment sink for, Certified Dietary Manager R stated its mainly just used for discarding ice and dumping out water from can goods. When asked where they thaw product, CDM R stated that they just have to use the cooler and plan it out, it would be helpful if we had a preparation sink we could use. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 5-402.11 Backflow Prevention. (A) Except as specified in (B), (C), and (D) of this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-15 · tag F0943 — widespread
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide annual required abuse prevention education for all employees. This has the potential to affect all 73 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. Findings include: Review of Preventing The Abuse of Residents with Dementia or Alzheimer's Disease In The Long-Term Care Setting: A Systematic Review, Published by The National library of Medicine, 2019, revealed . there is an increasing rate of abuse in the long-term care setting, specifically for those individuals with either dementia or Alzheimer's. Common causes and risk factors leading to this abuse include poor training . In an interview on 11/15/24 at 12:41 PM, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) E reported she was not aware she was responsible for training employee education and just found out about a month ago. ADON E reported she does not have access to the (Vendor) electronic training program to track education completion. In an interview on 11/15/24 at 1:09 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported the facility had (Vendor) electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to minimize the risk of scalding and burns by allowing domestic hot water to exceed 120°F. This resulted in an increased risk of injury among residents in the following areas. Findings include: During a tour of the Riverside Spa, with Maintenance Director Z, at 1:45 PM on 11/13/24, it was found that the hot water from the hand sink reached 123F when using a Thermoworks rapid read digital thermometer. When asked what he normally gets for hot water temperatures, MD Z stated 116F-118F. Observation of the boiler room, at 1:54 PM on 11/13/24, found that the boiler was set at 140F and domestic hot water flows through a thermostatic mixing valve which is showing an outgoing temperature of 125F to the floor. When asked if there were any other hot water systems in the building, MD Z stated no, and that the kitchen and laundry get hot water direct from this source as well, but before its mixed down. When asked when he usually takes hot water temperatures, MD Z stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to 1.) provide proper documentation of notice of transfers to 2 (Residents #72, and #40) of 3 residents who were transferred from the facility and 2.) provide resident transfer notifications to the local ombudsman. Findings include: Resident #72 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #72 had pertinent diagnoses which included: Traumatic hemorrhage of the cerebrum (bleeding in the brain) and non-displaced fracture of the seventh cervical vertebra (a break in the cervical spine in the neck). Review of Notice of Involuntary Transfer or Discharge and Facility-Initiated Discharge for Nursing Homes' provided by Director of Nursing (DON) B for Resident #72 on 11/14/2024 was noted to be dated 7/8/24, with a proposed date of transfer as 7/10/24, reason for transfer was resident no longer needed services provided by the facility. Resident #72 signature was noted on form. In an interview on 11/14/24 at 12:49 PM., Social Work Director (SWD) FF reported she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #35 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #35 had pertinent diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and contracture (condition that causes a joint to become very stiff and prevents normal movement) of the right hand. Review of Physician Orders for Resident #35 revealed monitor skin integrity to RUE (right upper extremity) (R Hand) related to splint use, started on 6/12/2023. Review of Care Plan for Resident #35 revealed soft hand splint to right hand apply every morning and remove at HS (bedtime). During an observation on 11/14/24 at 3:43 PM., Resident #35 was lying in bed and did not have a soft splint on her right arm. Review of Physician Order for Resident #35 revealed remove splint Q (every) HS at bedtime for contracture management note to be discontinued on 9/9/2024. During an observation on 11/15/24 at 8:15 AM., Resident #35 was sitting in her wheelchair, no noted soft hand splint on her right hand. In an interview on 11/15/2024 at 11:00 AM., Certified Nursing Assistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain nebulizer equipment for 1 (Resident #2) of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care resulting in the potential for inconsistent equipment exchange, irregular cleaning, and respiratory infection. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #2 had pertinent diagnoses which included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD (a lung and airway disease that restricts breathing). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #2, with a reference date of 10/31/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13/15 which indicated Resident #2 was cognitively intact. During observations on 11/13/24 at 11:48 AM, 11/14/24 at 10:11 AM and 3:15 PM, 11/15/24 at 8:13 AM and 9:59 AM, a nebulizer machine (a machine that turns liquid medication into a fine mist that a person can inhale through a face mask) with tubing with one end connected to the machine and the other end connected to nebulizer kit with a mask attached was noted to be laying directly on the top of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 consents or declinations were obtained for 2 residents (Resident #44, Resident #37) of 5 reviewed for immunizations resulting in residents/family members being unaware of the vaccination and the risks/benefits of having it completed. Findings include: Resident #44 (R44) Review of the admission Record and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R44 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (condition that is characterized by memory loss and judgement) and cognitive communication deficit. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflected a score of 6 which indicated R44 was severely cognitively impaired (00 to 07 is severe cognitive impairment). Review of R44's immunization record revealed her last COVID-19 vaccine was the Pfizer Booster which was given to her on 10/9/2023 per historical data. Review of R44's medical record did not reveal any indication that her dual POAs were contacted regarding consent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — isolated
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of training for behavioral health care and services for 128 staff reviewed for behavioral health care and dementia training. This deficient practice had the potential to result in unmet behavioral health care needs and services for residents. Findings include: In an interview on 11/15/24 at 12:41 PM, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) E reported she was not aware she was responsible for training employee education and just found out about a month ago. ADON E reported she does not have access to the (Vendor) electronic training program to track education completion. In an interview on 11/15/24 at 1:09 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported the facility had (Vendor) electronic training program prior but the facility was not able to assign trainings to staff as the training program was owned by the facility's previous owners and the new owners did or could not continue with a contract for the electronic training program. DON B reported the facility began conducting educations via in person education…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report an elopement and submit an investigation report to the State Agency within 5 days, for one resident (Resident #100) of three residents reviewed for abuse, from a total sample of 4 Residents, resulting in an elopement being unidentified or properly investigated, and the potential for continued elopements to go unreported and thoroughly investigated. Findings include: Review of the facility's Elopement and Wandering Residents policy with a reference date of 1/24 revealed: Definition: Elopement occurs when a resident leaves the premises without authorization (i.e., an order for discharge or leave of absence) and/or any necessary supervision to do so. Section 5 titled Procedure for Locating Missing Resident item g. stated: Appropriate reporting requirements to the State Survey agency shall be conducted. Resident #100 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #100, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person centered care plan for one resident (Resident #100) of three residents reviewed for elopement, resulting in the resident exiting the building unsupervised, and a potential for the resident to experience more than minimal harm. Findings include: Resident #100 Review of the facility's Elopements and Wandering Residents policy, with a reference date of 1/2024, revealed Policy: This facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents, and receive care in accordance with their person-centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement risk .Definition: Elopement occurs when a resident leaves the premises without authorization .or necessary supervision . Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, v1.16, Chapter 2: Assessments for the Resident Assessment Instrument…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an environment that was free from accident hazards for two residents (Resident #100 and Resident #104) of four residents reviewed for accidents. This deficient practiced resulted in an elopement for Resident #100 and the potential for more than minimal harm, and Resident #104 enduring a head laceration when he fell from mechanical lift that had not been properly maintained. Findings include: Resident #100 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #100, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, and other specified disorders of bone density and structure (condition causing a decrease bone mineral density and bone mass). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #100, with a reference date of 3/2/9/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15 which indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately assist a resident with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for 1 (Resident #35) 3 residents reviewed for ADL care, resulting in Resident #35 having unshaven facial hair and the potential for feelings of embarrassment and self-consciousness. Findings include: Resident #35 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #35 was a female, with pertinent diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's Disease (a type of dementia), muscle weakness, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #35, with a reference date of 8/29/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #35 was moderately cognitively impaired. Further review of said MDS revealed Resident #35 required limited, one-person physical assistance for personal hygiene (how resident maintains personal hygiene, including combing hair, brushing teeth, shaving, applying makeup, washing/drying face and hands).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to supervise 1 (Resident #42) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents/hazards resulting in Resident #42 consuming a non-food item during her meal and the potential for choking. Findings include: Resident #42 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #42 was a female, with pertinent diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's disease (a type of dementia), unspecified dementia unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, adult failure to thrive, repeated falls, dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), anxiety disorder, and psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #42, with a reference date of 9/8/23 revealed a Staff Assessment for Mental Status for Resident #42 as having short and long-term memory problems and that her Cognitive Skills for Daily Decision Making were Severely impaired. Further review of said MDS revealed Resident #42 required supervision and one-person physical assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that supplemental oxygen was continuously supplied to 1 resident (Resident #31) of 1 reviewed for continuous oxygen use resulting in fear and anxiety, shortness of breath, and hypoxia (low oxygen levels in the blood) which can lead to confusion, disorientation, decreased consciousness, and death. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #31 had pertinent diagnoses which included respiratory failure with hypoxia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #31, with a reference date of 9/9/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10/15 which indicated Resident #31 was moderately cognitively impaired. During an observation on 10/2/23 at 9:50 AM, Resident #31 was sitting in her wheelchair in the dining room at a table with other residents, conversing and appeared short of breath with speaking. During an observation on 10/2/23 at 10:10 AM, Resident #31 was sitting in her wheelchair in the dining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1.) perform proper hand hygiene during catheter care in 1 resident (Resident #38) of 1 reviewed for catheter care and 2.) ensure sanitary conditions for privacy curtains in resident's rooms, resulting in the potential for the introduction of infection, cross-contamination, and disease transmission. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #38 had pertinent diagnoses which included obstructive and reflux uropathy (disorder of the urinary system) unspecified and a history of a catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #38, with a reference date of 7/4/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5/15 which indicated Resident #38 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Physician Orders for Resident #38 revealed, indwelling urinary (Foley) catheter care: cleanse with soap and water every shift . Review of Care Plan for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$137,535 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $137,535 — penalty dated 2025-10-30
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-12-03 for 48 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ORCHARDS MICHIGAN — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
KORNFELD, ROBERTIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF10%since 11/01/2025
GUTMAN, ISAACIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2025
HOFFMAN, ALEXANDERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2025
TAUB, JACOBIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2026
WHITE LAKE HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2025
ROBERTS, RANDYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2025
SMITH, GARRETTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2025
TEEPLE, MELISSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-16.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense22% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 58%Medicare 6%Other / private 36%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$352per resident / day
operating cost
$10,707per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$302per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235354. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next