No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Orchards at Northwest

16181 Hubbell St, Detroit, MI 48235 · For profit - Corporation · 154 certified beds · (313) 273-8764 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (313) 273-8764 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0609) — most recent Jan 20252 actual-harm citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$15,889 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,889 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-21)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
13705 McNichols Rd W · (313) 638-9333 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
13535 Puritan St · (313) 493-8868 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
16215 Cruse St
Park
15701 Verne St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
16200 Hubbell St · (313) 838-2922

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased23.7%10.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.9%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.3%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.7%12.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.3%19.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.3%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%5.1%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.8%20.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.9%14.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.8%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine61.4%79.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.0%24.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.2%11.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.291.841.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.081.641.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

31.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 62% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF31.1%CMS range 18.3–47.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 7.3–16.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened9.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.9%CMS range 5.5–16.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.051.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.22
RN hours/ resident / day
1.46
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.94
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.62
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 115.8 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.22 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.25 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-10)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to a cognitively impaired resident (R501) who eloped from the facility unbeknownst to staff for two hours resulting in the likelihood for serious harm, injury, impairment, or death. Findings Include: According to the Facility Reported Incident dated 2/2/24, R501 was unable to be located in the facility during midnight rounds on 2/2/24 at approximately 12:30 AM. A facility campus wide search was conducted and R501 was not located. The Facility's Investigation summary dated 2/7/24 concluded that on 2/1/24 at approximately 10:45 PM R501 had walked out the facility's front door that was unattended and triggered the front door alarm. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A went to the front door and looked in the foyer area and out the window. LPN A did not see anyone and reset the front door alarm without going outside the facility's front door. The reception-desk area at the front window/door area was unattended from approximately 10:30 PM - 11:00 PM during shift change. The afternoon shift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number 2715345. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide two staff during a shower and failed to reposition in a safe manner one dependent resident (R400) of three residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in a fall from the shower bed to the floor with subsequent pain and a facial laceration requiring sutures.Findings include: On 01/22/2026 at 09:12 AM, R400 was observed in bed on their back. R400's right knee was bent upwards and lying against the mattress. R400 was wearing glasses, a hospital style gown, and watching television. Observation of R400 revealed a right forehead/eyebrow scar. The sutures were removed. R400 was queried about the scar/laceration on their face. R400's speech was somewhat slurred, however, R400 was able to answer simple questions with incomplete, slow responses. R400 reported being on the bed (shower bed) and she rolled over and fell on to the shower floor. At that time, R400 pointed to their right side. R400…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-01-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number 2715345.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants were trained on repositioning techniques and implementing appropriate care when providing resident showers, resulting in one resident (R400) rolling off of the shower bed to the floor sustaining injuries. Findings include:On 01/22/2026 at 09:12 AM, R400 was observed in bed, on their back. R400's right knee was bent upwards and lying against the mattress. R400 had a right forehead/eyebrow scar from a laceration. R400 was queried about the laceration on their face. R400's speech was somewhat slurred, however, R400 was able to answer simple questions with incomplete, slow responses. R400 said (they) were on the bed (shower bed) and rolled over (R400 pointing to their right side) and fell on the shower floor. R400 was asked how many staff were helping with the shower and R400 said one. R400 was asked if they were still having pain. R400 pointed (with left hand)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include:On 03/08/2026 at 8:40 AM a tour of the kitchen was conducted with cook F who was serving as the acting manager for the day.On 03/08/2026 at 8:57 AM observed a plastic tube running from the ice machine drain line into the floor drain in the kitchen. The plastic drain line extended below the flood level rim of the drain, creating an improper air gap.On 03/08/2026 at 9:33 AM observed a black corrugated tube connected to the juice gun drain line leading into the floor drain in the kitchen. The tube extended down to the base of the floor drain, creating an improper air gap.According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 5-402.11 Backflow Prevention. (A) Except as specified in (B), (C), and (D) of this section, a direct connection may not exist between the SEWAGE system and a drain originating from EQUIPMENT in which FOOD, portable EQUIPMENT, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-10 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report staffing data to the payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) with the potential to affect all 117 residents residing in the building. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for staffing concerns leading to quality-of-care concerns. Findings include:Per a review of the PBJ report for Fiscal Year Quarter 4 2025 (July 1 - September 30), the facility failed to submit data for the quarter. The facility also triggered for a One Star Staffing Rating, Excessively Low Weekend Staffing, No Registered Nurse Hours, and Failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day (indicating a lack of reported staffing or inadequate staffing). On 3/10/2026 at 1:41 p.m., the Director of Human Resources (HRD) was interviewed about the PBJ report and submission. The HRD was aware the PBJ was not submitted and said the PBJ was analyzed, reviewed and submitted to the corporate office to be submitted but it would have been late so it was not submitted. On 3/10/26 at 1:55 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was interviewed about the PBJ…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have an active plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in waterborne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility. Findings Include:On 03/08/2026 at 1:12 PM observed an inoperable water fountain in the basement indicating possible stagnant water.On 03/08/2026 beginning at 1:21 PM a tour of the facility was conducted with Environmental Services Manager (ESM) K. On 03/08/2026 at 1:37 PM observed a hopper in the first-floor trash room. An interview at this time with ESM K found the housekeeping team flushes the hopper once a week when cleaned but do not turn on the water at the hopper faucet or use the spray hose during this process.On 03/08/2026 at 1:42 PM observed slightly discolored water coming from the sink faucet for a few seconds before running clear in the first-floor soiled linen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain general cleanliness and repair of the premises as well as proper storage of clean and sanitary supplies. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in satisfaction of living affecting all residents. Findings Include:On 03/08/2026 at 10:28 AM observed the sink faucet releasing a trickle of water when turned on in the first-floor nutrition room. An interview at this time with District Manager I regarding the faucet found they were unsure how long the faucet had been operating in this condition.On 03/08/2026 at 11:08 AM observed nails screwed into the cabinet doors beneath the sink in the third-floor nutrition room. When the cabinet doors were opened, the nails were observed protruding through the wood and sticking out approximately one inch. Further observation of the cabinet beneath the sink found a container with a thick black substance along the bottom edges. The container was situated beneath the drain line, and no active leak was observed.On 03/08/2026…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the smoking policy was implemented and practiced for one (R93) of one resident reviewed for accidents and hazards, resulting in (1.) smoking in the facility, (2.) smoking materials not stored in a safe place, (3.) potentially affect safe fire safety practices, (4.) and the potential for bodily harm. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents that reside in the facility. Findings include:On 3/08/2026 at 12:01p.m R93 was observed in the bedroom coloring. R93 was pleasant, alert, and oriented to person, place, and situation. The odor of cigarette smoke smelled from outside the bedroom. R93 was selected for review for residents that smoke. On 3/09/2026 at 9:11 a.m. - R93 was observed in the designated smoking area smoking independently with other residents. Review of the clinical record revealed R93 was initially admitted into the facility on 9/27/25 and readmitted from the hospital on 2/4/26 with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistive dining equipment for one resident (R49) out of two residents reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM).Findings include: On 03/08/2026 at 11:26 AM, R49 was observed in bed with contractures of both hands. On 3/09/2026 at 8:40 AM, R49 was observed eating breakfast in bed. R49's breakfast tray consisted of a divided plate and a regular glass. R49's meal ticket stated, highlighted, 2 handled cup; Divided plate. R49 was asked if staff brought her the 2 handled cup and replied, They didn't bring it to me. R49 demonstrated difficulty grasping and bringing the regular cup to her mouth.On 3/10/2026 at 8:44 AM, R49 was observed sitting in a Geri chair eating breakfast. R49 stated, They didn't give me the special cup, it's easier for me to drink with it. R49's breakfast tray consisted of a divided plate and a regular glass. R49's meal ticket stated, highlighted, 2 handled cup; Divided plate. On 3/10/2026 at 8:45 AM, Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper skin care for two residents (R61 and R117) out of two residents reviewed for skin conditions who were dependent upon staff for performance of activities of daily living (ADL). Findings include: R61. On 3/8/2026 at approximately 12:45 p.m. and on 3/9/2026 at approximately 12:17 p.m., R61 was observed seated in a wheelchair in the dining room. R61's face was observed to have dry skin with flakes. Large particles that appeared to be dry scalp flakes were visible in R61's hair. A significant amount of large flaky skin particles was observed on the front of R61's pants. During an interview, R61stated, I do not get anything for my dry flaky skin, but I want some moisturizer or something. On 3/10/2026 at approximately 10:00 a.m., R61's assigned Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) S on 3/8/2026, 3/9/2026, and 3/10/2026 was interviewed regarding R61's dry skin. CNA S was asked if they noticed R61 to have flaky dry skin on the face and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly assess the nutritional status and implement nutrition interventions for one resident (R12) out of one resident reviewed for dialysis. Findings include: On 3/9/26 at 9:31 AM, R12 was observed at the nurse's station prior to being transported to the dialysis center. R12 responded pleasantly when greeted. When queried about their appetite and meals, R12 responded that they had been eating okay. R12 appeared thin in appearance. A review of the clinical record for R12 documented an original admission date of 5/24/25 and readmission date of 10/21/25. R12's diagnoses included end stage renal disease (ESRD) and atherosclerotic heart disease. Physician's orders documented R12 was scheduled for hemodialysis services weekly on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. R12 was prescribed a regular diet of pureed texture with thin liquid consistency. Additional review of R12's medical record documented the following:1. Dialysis communication sheet dated 11/19/25: Please send provider note for urology or update noted on plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent coordination of care between the facility and the contracted dialysis center for one resident (R12) out of one resident reviewed for dialysis services. Findings include:During an interview on 3/9/26 at 9:29 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Y said completed dialysis communication sheets were put into a purple book at the nurse's station and then given to the Registered Dietitian (RD) for review. The following completed dialysis communication sheets for R12 were available at the nurse's station: 3/2/26, 3/4/26, 3/6/26. On 3/9/26 at 9:31 AM, R12 was observed at the nurse's station prior to being transported to the dialysis center. R12 responded pleasantly when greeted. During an interview on 3/9/26 at 1:05 PM, RD V was queried about available dialysis communication sheets for R12 and provided documents dated 12/15/25, 1/2/26, 1/30/26, and 2/6/26. RD V said they feel the rest of the communication sheets were at the nurse's station. During an interview on 3/9/26 at 1:30 PM, Unit Manager/LPN T…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to display current daily staff ratio information in a prominent area that was readily accessible for all 117 residents as well as visitors/vendors in the facility and ensure the proper retention of previous staff ratio postings. Findings include: On 3/8/26 at 8:30 AM, upon entry into the facility, a document titled, Daily Staffing Report, dated 3/6/26 was observed posted in the foyer. During an interview on 3/10/26 at 10:08 AM, Staffing Coordinator (SC) U confirmed responsibility for the daily staffing report Monday through Friday, and weekend supervisors were accountable for its completion Saturday and Sunday. SC U indicated the daily staff postings were to be available so families could check to see if there was adequate staffing. A review of daily staffing reports for January 2026 was conducted with SC U. Daily staff postings were not available for the following dates: 1/1/26, 1/3/26, 1/4/26, 1/9/26, 1/10/26, 1/11/26, 1/15/26, 1/17/26, 1/18/26, 1/24/26, 1/25/26, and 1/31/26. During an interview on 3/10/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart was secured in accordance with professional standards for one medication cart of six medication carts reviewed for medication storage and safety.Findings include: On 03/08/2026 at 08:38 AM, during a tour of the third floor, a medication cart on hall Three- East was observed with a tubular lock key system extended outward (unlocked). The drawers to the cart were opened and closed to ensure findings. Three unidentified residents were observed sitting in wheelchairs close to the medication cart. One unidentified resident was observed walking up and down the Three-East hallway. No staff were observed in the Three-East hallway. The medication cart was stationed not accessible to view of the nursing desk.On 03/08/2026 at 08:40 AM, Nurse Q was observed walking back towards the Three-East Hall. Nurse Q was asked about the unlocked medication cart. Nurse Q stated that nurses are expected to lock their medication carts when not in view of their cart.On 03/10/2026 at 10:54 AM, the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Clean surfaces in the kitchen that were visibly soiled; 2. Maintain easily cleanable floors in various areas of the kitchen; 3. Ensure properly working garbage disposal and sink faucet; 4. Ensure chemical solution (quaternary) was an effective sanitizer; 5. Ensure pans were clean and air dried before stacking. This deficient practice would affect any resident that consumed food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 1/6/25 at 10:38 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM) N the following was observed: - caked up dust covered a white opaque circular disk above the handwashing sink - the trash can lid near the handwashing sink appeared dirty and uncleaned. - several floor tiles in the dish tank machine were chipped or missing rendering a floor surface not easily cleanable. - a splattering of grits was on the backsplash of the drain board on the clean side of the commercial dishmachine On 1/6/25 at 12:00 PM, during a return visit to the kitchen, the splattering of grits remained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. Findings include: On 1/8/25 at 3:12 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) was interviewed about the facility's QAPI program and process and identified customer service and adherence to the resident smoking policy as areas of concern and opportunities for improvement. The NHA said they were trying to get staff to speak with residents in a professional manner and that resident needs were being met. The NHA indicated that residents were keeping smoking paraphernalia on their persons and were going out to smoke when they got ready and there was no supervision. The NHA was unable to provide objective data gathered regarding these areas of concern. Therefore there was no analysis performed to identify trends and measure the effectiveness of the performance improvement plan. The NHA said the best practice would have been after the problem was identified to count the actual defective items and analyze the data monthly for improvement. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to continuously implement and operationalize a comprehensive infection control program, encompassing outcome and process surveillance, accurate data collection/documentation/analysis, resulting in a lack of accurate and comprehensive infection control tracking, surveillance and data monitoring/analysis and the potential for the spread of microorganisms, illness and other harmful pathogens among other residents that reside in the facility. Findings include: On 1/8/25 at 9:29 AM, a review of the facility's infection control program was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) who has performed as the facility's designated infection control leader since August 2024. Review of the infection control books provided by the facility revealed no documentation of an infection control program from August 10, 2024, through September 30, 2024. The DON confirmed prior to her running the infection control program, it was overseen by the Infection Preventionist (IP) who resigned in early August of 2024. The DON said, I hired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a continuous Antibiotic Stewardship Program that included monitoring antibiotic usage and following protocols for antibiotic use resulting in the potential for unnecessary medications and antibiotic resistance. Findings include: On 1/8/25 at 9:29 AM, a review of the facility's infection control program was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) who has performed as the facility's designated infection control leader since August 2024. Review of the infection control books provided by the facility revealed no documentation of an infection control program from August 10, 2024, through September 30, 2024. The DON confirmed prior to her running the infection control program, it was overseen by the Infection Preventionist (IP) who resigned in early August of 2024. The DON said, I hired another IP in September, but it did not work out. The DON was asked how they were able to identify residents on antibiotics during the months of August and September 2024. The DON said that they talked about residents on antibiotics…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-08 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure continuity of care for the role of an Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) and ensure the ICP completed specialized training in infection prevention and control, resulting in the potential for knowledge deficits pertaining to current infection prevention and control standards, outbreaks going undetected because of inadequate infection control surveillance, and a delay in infection control data collection and summary. Findings include: On 1/8/25 at 9:29 AM, a review of the facility's infection control program was with the Director of Nursing (DON) who has performed as the facility's designated infection control leader since August 2024. Review of the infection control books provided by the facility revealed no documentation of an infection control program from August 10, 2024, through September 30, 2024. The DON confirmed prior to her running the infection control program, it was overseen by the Infection Preventionist (IP) who resigned in early August of 2024. The DON was asked when they completed the Nursing Home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-08 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to screen residents for eligibility to receive the COVID 19 vaccine and/or booster, provide education regarding the COVID 19 vaccine and/or booster, and offer the COVID 19 vaccine and/or booster, resulting in residents not receiving the Covid-19 immunization, and the potential for decreased protection from SARs-CoV-2 virus and serious illness and complications among residents that reside in the facility. Findings include: On 1/8/25 at 9:29 AM, a review of the facility's infection control program was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) who has performed as the facility's designated infection control leader since August 2024. Review of the infection control books provided by the facility revealed no documentation of an infection control program related to COVID 19 vaccines and/or boosters. The DON was asked about their COVID 19 vaccines. The DON stated, We do not have any COVID 19 vaccines. No one has received the vaccine. The DON also stated that they previously had an outside company that would come into the facility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with nail care, oral care, shaves, hair care, and body hygiene for five residents (R2, R49, R51, R108, and R112) out of nine residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), resulting in unmet ADL needs. R2 On 1/6/2025 at 10:38 a.m., R2 was observed lying in bed alert and unable to be interviewed. The surveyor observed R2 with long, dirty, untrimmed fingernails on both hands, with dry scaly skin on bilateral legs and feet. There was white-colored, crusty residue on lips and near both eyes. R2 had matted, unkempt hair. A hospital bracelet dated 12/15/2024 was noted on R2's right arm. On 1/8/2025 at 9:52 a.m., during an interview in R2's room, licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B rubbed across R2's head and confirmed the resident's hair was not combed and matted on the top and on the back. LPN B was informed of R2's Tuesday's and Friday's afternoon showers days and was asked should the hospital bracelet have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty for eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week; resulting in the potential for inadequate coordination of emergent or routine care that could cause negative outcomes. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 120 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 1/08/25 at 12:13 PM review of the nurses' schedule for the months of October, November and December 2024 with staffing coordinator G, revealed there was no Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on the following dates: -[DATE] -[DATE] -[DATE] -[DATE] -[DATE] -[DATE] -[DATE] -[DATE] -[DATE] -[DATE] -[DATE] -[DATE] -[DATE] -[DATE] Staffing coordnitaor G acknowlwdged the facility has not been able to get RN coverage for weekends. O1/08/25 at 2:20PM the Director of Nursing (DON) agreed there hasn't been consistent RN weekend coverage and the expectation is that there is 8-hour RN coverage 7 days per week. Review of the facility policy titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant effecting all residents residing on the second floor and all residents who use the elevator, resulting in an unsafe, poorly functional environment with the potential for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage. Findings include: On 1/8/25 at 8:05 AM the Director of Maintenance (DOM) M was interviewed and said maintenance completed ongoing monthly checklists for environmental and maintenance concerns. On 1/8/25 at 8:20 AM a second-floor environmental tour was conducted with the DOM M. The following items were noted: -The elevator had a soiled exhaust fan. -The second-floor pantry door paint was scuffed. DOM M agreed the door needed to be painted. -The second-floor hallways paint appeared dingy with multiple scratches. DOM M agreed the entire second floor was in need new paint. - Two nails were exposed on the handrail between the soiled and clean linen rooms. DOM M stated I will remove the exposed nails and fix the handrail today. -Resident rooms 227, 228,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure annual Dementia Management and Abuse training were performed for three Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) H, I and J out of five CNAs reviewed for in-service training resulting in the potential for unmet resident care needs. Findings include: On 1/6/24 at 2:28 PM, review of five CNAs in-service training education content revealed the following: CNA H Date of hire (DOH)- 5/28/2004. Review of a facility provided transcript dated 5/28/24 through 6/28/24 for CNA H, failed to identify abuse and dementia management training. CNA I DOH 5/17/2016. Review of a facility provided transcript dated 5/17/23 through 5/17/24for CNA I, failed to identify abuse and dementia management training. CNA J DOH 6/21/2010. Review of a facility provided transcript dated 6/21/23 through 6/21/24 for CNA J, failed to identify abuse and dementia management training. On 1/08/25 at 8:51 AM Staff Educator K was interviewed and said that she recently started the position in September of 2024 and that there were limited records for staff education. Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a call button was within reach for one resident (R178) reviewed for accommodation of needs, resulting in the resident not having a method to request assistance when needed. Findings include: On 1/6/25 at 3:25 PM, R178 was observed awake and lying in bed. R178's bed was positioned against the wall and R178's right arm appeared wedged between the bed and the wall. R178 indicated he was in pain and was unable to free his arm. R178's call light was clipped to his pillow case. R178's indicated he was unable to reach the call light with his left arm. On 1/6/25 at 3:30 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) T joined the Surveyor in R178's room and confirmed R178's arm was wedged between the bed and wall and R178 was unable to reach the call light with his other arm. R178 winced in pain as LPN T moved the bed to free his arm. On 1/8/25 at 12:13 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) said the call light should have been in place where the resident could reach it . On 1/8/25 at 5:30 PM during the exit conference,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an Advance Directive was completed for one resident R14 of nine residents reviewed for advance directives resulting in the potential for inaccurate life sustaining measures or withholding medical treatment. Findings include: On 1/7/2025, record review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R14 was initially admitted into the facility on 6/14/2024 with a diagnoses Candidiasis, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Dysphagia and Myocardial Infarction. There was no signed Advanced Directive. According to admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment dated [DATE], R14 had Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 4/15 impaired cognition. R14 required extensive one-person assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). On 1/8/2025 at 12:35 PM, Social Worker (SW) L was interviewed regarding R14's Advance Directive and said they had emailed the guardian agency at the time of admission to have them complete the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for one resident (R65) of six residents reviewed for bowel and bladder, resulting in the potential delay o care and treatment. Findings include: On 1/6/2025 at 11:11 a.m., R65's urinal was observed hanging on the foot of the bed with approximately five hundred and fifty milliliters (mls) of red-colored urine. R65 confirmed during an interview it was blood in the urinal that occurred while urinating the previous night before the start of day shift and the nurse was aware. R65 stated, I was scared to death when I saw the blood in my urinal, and no one has done anything about it Yet. According to the electronic health record (EHR), R65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of candidal sepsis (a life-threatening condition that occurs when the candida fungus enters the bloodstream .untreated candida infection carries the risk of leading to a systemic infection .), Enterocolitis due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00147576. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an injury of unknown source in a timely manner to the abuse coordinator for one resident (R125) out of two residents reviewed for abuse resulting in the untimely investigation of an injury of unknown origin. Findings include: The facility self-reported to the State Agency a resident injury of unknown source. A review of the facility's 5-Day submission dated 10/15/24 documented in part the following: - Investigation Summary: On 10/4/24 R125 complained of bilateral lower extremity pain. An order was entered for a stat x-ray for left knee, tibula, fibula and left foot and ankle. The stat X-ray result revealed no recent fracture or dislocation. The physician was notified of continued pain and swelling to left lower leg and foot. Additional orders given for x-rays for left leg and a venous doppler. The deep vein thrombosis was inconclusive, and R125 was transferred out to the local hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a tracheostomy (a surgical opening in the neck to provide an airway to the lungs) for one resident (R175) reviewed for tracheostomy care. Findings include: On 1/6/25 at 1:00 PM, R175 was observed awake, lying in bed with a tracheostomy (trach) tube secured around his neck. Review of R175's clinical record documented an admission date of 12/16/24. R175's diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, laryngeal cancer, esophageal cancer, and tracheostomy status. On 1/8/25 at 12:10 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed R175's care plans and confirmed that a comprehensive care plan for tracheostomy care had not been developed for R175. The DON said R175 should have a care plan that addressed tracheostomy care which would include how to care for it and what to look for. On 1/8/25 at 5:30 PM during the exit conference, the Nursing Home Administrator and Director of Nursing did not offer additional documentation or information when asked.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove broken and hazardous objects from one resident (R85) room to ensure safety of three residents reviewed for accident hazards, resulting in the potential for injuries. Findings include: On 1/6/2025 approximately at 9:57 a.m., R85 was observed lying in bed alert and able to be interviewed. Observed a long sharp metal screw protruding at the top of a detached closet door propped and leaning toward R85' s bed which was proximal to the closet. Observed a detached bed bumper with multiple protruding screws against the wall behind the resident's bed. R85 said during an interview that the closet door had been broken since admission [DATE]). R85 stated, I don't want that door with that screw in it to fall and hit me in my head. I am right here when it falls. It couldn't miss me. According to the electronic health record (EHR), R85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of anoxic brain damage, epilepsy, paroxysmal atrial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper weight monitoring occurred for one resident (R20) deemed to be at nutrition risk out of six residents reviewed for nutrition status, resulting in the potential for compromise in nutrition status to go undetected. On1/6/25 at approximately 10:00 AM R20 was observed in bed. The resident could not be meaningfully interviewed due to severe cognitive impairment. The resident had an intravenous (IV) pole with a tube feeding pump attached. No tube feeding was present on the IV pole. According to R20's Electronic Health Record (EHR) the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fecal impaction, cerebral palsy acute and chronic respiratory failure, and anoxic brain damage. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] R20 was classified as comatose and totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. R20 had a feeding tube (flexible tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to (1) have emergency tracheostomy (a surgical opening in the neck to provide an airway to the lungs) supplies readily available for one resident (R175) and (2) failed to consistently follow the physician's medical orders for tracheostomy care (R74) out of three residents reviewed for tracheostomy care. Findings include: R175 On 1/6/25 at 1:00 PM, R175 was observed awake and lying in bed. R175 was observed with a tracheostomy (trach) tube secured around his neck. An emergency trach bag/box was not visible in R175's room. On 1/6/24 at 1:04 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) W was queried if R175 had emergency trach equipment. LPN W and LPN X entered R175's room. Both LPN W and LPN X searched R175's room and were unable to locate emergency trach equipment. LPN X said the equipment was usually tacked on the board. LPN X pointed to a empty bulletin board at the head of R175's bed. LPN X said it was an issue that the trach emergency equipment was not in R175's room and that they need to correct that now. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical supplies for one resident (R10) reviewed for tracheostomy (a surgical opening in the neck to provide an airway to the lungs) care were not expired. On [DATE] at 1:20 PM, R10 was observed in bed eating lunch. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) X entered the room with the State Surveyor to check for tracheostomy (trach) supplies. LPN X stated that R10 did not have a trach but R10 had a stoma. On [DATE] at 12:30 PM, R10 provided permission for a nurse and the Surveyor to look through the supplies in his room. On [DATE] at 12:34 PM, the contents of a multi-drawer storage cabinet located in R10's room were observed with the Director of Nursing (DON) and revealed the following: - One box of (Brand XX) HME expired [DATE]. (HME is a heat and moisture exchanger designed to replicate the functions of the nose and upper airways to improve respiratory function following laryngectomy.) The box contained approximately 30 devices. - Three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0914 — isolated
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and privacy, by not repairing broken window blinds for one resident (R35) of one resident sampled for visual privacy resulting in feelings of disrespect and the potential of exposure during care. Findings Include: On 1/06/25 at 11:56 AM, R35 was observed in bed on their back. R35 was covered with a sheet and was not wearing a gown. An interview was conducted with R35 regarding their stay in the facility. R35 stated that they don't have many complaints but would like window blinds to be fixed because it had been broken for a while and was covered with a soiled sheet. R35 said that although they like being next to the window, they did not like that someone could see them from the outside, especially at night. R35 stated, They (staff) won't tell someone to fix it .It looks bad and I'm tired of looking at that dirty sheet. The sheet was observed hanging on the lower portion of the window blinds and was stained. The blinds had several…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake MI00141452. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement proper hand hygiene and glove use during wound care for one resident (R606) and failed to provide the proper receptable for the disposal of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for one resident (R608) out of 10 residents reviewed for infection control, resulting in the potential for increased cross-contamination of diseases which place a vulnerable population at high risk for infections. Findings include: R606 In an observation on 3/21/24 at 10:36 a.m. R606 had a dressing on the right foot. R606 reported having an infection in the right foot. Review of Physician orders revealed R606 had orders for wound care of right toes/foot every day shift every two days which was last revised on 3/21/24. In an observation on 3/21/24 at 11:48 a.m., Wound Nurse (WN) C prepared to perform wound care on R606's right foot. WN C placed R606's foot a towel on the bed. Wound supplies laid on R606's bedside table without a barrier. WN C applied gloves and did not perform hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to inake MI00141101. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for two residents (R402 and R410) of four residents reviewed for accommodation of needs, resulting in unmet care needs and the potential for further unmet care needs. Findings include: R402 On 11/28/2023 at 9:45 a.m., R402's call light was observed behind the head of the bed on the floor and out of reach. During an interview R402 said, I can use the call light for help only if I could reach it. Where is it (while looking around for the call light). I needed some help earlier with my breakfast, but I didn't see the call light. On 11/28/2023 at approximately 10:00 a.m., during observation and interview in R402's room (room [ROOM NUMBER]), Certified Nursing Assistance (CNA) C confirmed R402 can use the call light for assistance and the call light should be in reach but was not. CNA C said that she had not been in R402's room to provide care, but only to pass the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00140791 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident (R404) out of three residents reviewed for elopement which resulted in R404 exiting a store unsupervised while on a facility outing without staff knowledge and the potential for injury. Findings include: Record review of R404's face sheet revealed admitted to facility on 11/09/2022 diagnoses included intracerebral hemorrhage, encephalopathy, chronic kidney disease stage 3, anxiety disorder, and dysphagia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R404 revealed a Brief interview for Mental Status BIMS of 9/15 moderate cognitive impairment and resident used wheelchair for mobility. In an interview on 11/28/2023 at 10:45 AM with R404 revealed R404 went on a shopping outing with the activities group and other residents to Retail Store YY on 10/20/2023. R404 reported he left the building by himself and self-propelled to the Retail Store XX store down and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two of five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA L and CNA M), whose in-service training files were reviewed, had the required annual dementia training within the required time period, resulting in the potential for unmet education needs, unmet resident care needs, and the potential for residents assigned to CNAs who have a diagnosis of dementia to not receive adequate care. Findings include: On 10/17/23 at 11:00 AM, CNA in-service training logs were reviewed with the Director of Nursing (DON) for the following CNAs: CNA L: Date Of Hire 5/28/04 CNA M: Date Of Hire 4/13/21 During the review there was no documentation that CNA L and CNA M had recieved Dementia training. In an interview on 10/17/23 at 3:58 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) explained in-services should be set up periodically and records of training should be readily available. By the end of the annual survey, the DON was unable to provide documentation that CNA L and M completed annual dementia training during their required time period.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation has two Deficient Practice Statements (DPS). DPS #1. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to calibrate (test using a control solution to ensure accuracy) for 3 of 5 glucometers (medical device used to measure blood sugar) in the facility resulting in the potential for inaccurate blood glucose readings. Findings include: On 10/17/23 at 12:15 PM during observation of blood sugar monitoring with the use of an [EvenCare G2] glucometer Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A was asked about calibration of the glucometer. LPN A said that midnight shift performs the calibration and documents it on a 'log'. There was no glucometer calibration log on the 1st floor medication cart, the nurse's station, or the medication room. During inspection of the 1st floor medication cart there were no 'testing solutions' observed. On 10/17/23 at approximately 12:30 PM with LPN D observation of the the 2nd floor's East Medication cart revealed a [EvenCare G2] glucometer in the medication cart without any testing solution for calibration. Upon inquiry LPN D said,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve standardized portions for menu items and ensure palatable temperatures of food and coffee for six residents (R24 , R49 , R59, R70, R86, and R94) and for eight of eight residents who attended the confidential group meeting, resulting in complaints of small portions, cold food/coffee, and tasteless meals. Findings include: On 10/16/23 at 12:40 PM review of the planned, posted menu indicated residents were to receive BBQ chicken, Roasted Potatoes, Steamed Broccoli, and Fruit Cobbler. Observation of the resident's lunch trays revealed some residents were observed with boneless chicken breast that were less than the three-ounce portion identified on the kitchen production menus. The sliced apple pie that was used as a substitute for the fruit cobbler was sliced very thin (approximately 1/8inch). The roasted potatoes were discolored, dark, and unattractive. Residents were randomly queried concerning the food and indicated overall dissatisfaction with the meals and taste of the food served, some of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00139366. Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent physical restraint use in one resident (R62) out of 10 residents reviewed for abuse resulting in the potential for physical and psychosocial harm. Findings include: Record review of R62's face sheet revealed admitted to facility on 5/4/2022 diagnoses included diffuse traumatic brain injury, anoxic brain damage, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R102 revealed severely impaired cognition and R62 required dependent assistance for mobility. Record Review of the nursing health status note dated 10/8/2022 revealed During walking rounds at approx. 6:20pm writer observed resident in Geri-Chair with pieces of his brief in his mouth. Writer was able to remove the pieces from resident's mouth, writer then removed the remaining portion of the brief off the resident for safety. Writer informed the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) assigned to the resident what happened, and not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00139366. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse for one resident (R62) of ten total residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in allegations of abuse that were not reported to the State Agency timely and the potential for further allegations of abuse to go unreported, and not thoroughly investigated. Findings include: Record review of R62's face sheet revealed admitted to facility on 5/4/2022 diagnoses included diffuse traumatic brain injury, anoxic brain damage, dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R102 revealed severely impaired cognition and required dependent assistance for mobility. Record Review of the nursing health status note dated 10/8/2022 revealed During walking rounds at approx. 6:20pm writer observed resident in Geri-Chair with pieces of his brief in his mouth. Writer was able to remove the pieces from resident's mouth, writer then removed the remaining portion of the brief off the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00135592. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide an arm rest on a resident's wheelchair for one resident (R119) out of nine residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in R119 falling from wheelchair and obtaining large hematoma (when an injury causes blood to pool and collect under skin). Findings include: An interview on 10/16/23 at 9:30 AM with concerned family member (CFM) I, it was reported that R119 was sent to dialysis with only one armrest on wheelchair and resident fell and had to be taken to the hospital. Review of R119's face sheet revealed admission into the facility on 4/4/23 with a diagnoses of end stage renal disease and a history of falling. According to the Minimum Data Set MDS dated [DATE], R119 had impaired cognition and required extensive assist with Activities of Daily Living (ADLS). Further review documented under Balancing During Transitions and Walking, Section E. Surface to surface transfer .- Not steady- only able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,889 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,889 — penalty dated 2024-02-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ORCHARDS MICHIGAN — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NORTHWEST OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/01/2022
MI OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2022
GUTMAN, ISAACIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2022
HOFFMAN, ALEXANDERIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2022
KORNFELD, ROBERTIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2022
TAUB, JACOBIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2022
DUMAS, ALEXANDREIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/01/2022
MOSS, KARENIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 06/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.8M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 5%Other / private 28%

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$311per resident / day
operating cost
$9,446per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$303per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235539. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next