The Orchards at Niles
1333 Wells St, Niles, MI 49120 · For profit - Corporation · 84 certified beds · (269) 684-1111 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (69) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.4% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.5% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.7% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.2% | 3.0% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.9% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.7% | 19.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.1% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.0% | 5.1% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.4% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.2% | 14.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 69.0% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.0% | 24.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 20.9% | 11.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.21 | 1.84 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.17 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 63.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.8%CMS range 28.7–50.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 7.0–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 63.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 44.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 4.0–12.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.87 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 76.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.554 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
69 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 59 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 2709637, 2718464Based on interview and record review, the facility licensed staff failed to follow professional standards of practice, communicate effectively with a provider for an acute change in condition for 1 (Resident #100) of 3 residents reviewed for change in condition, resulting in delay in care for blood in the stool, increased confusion, and leading to the potential of a decline in overall physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #100 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included dementia, sleep disorders, mild cognitive impairment, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, dysphagia (damage to the brain responsible for production and comprehension of speech), cognitive communication deficit (progressive degenerative brain disorder resulting in difficulty with thinking and how someone uses language), and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Nurses Note dated [DATE] at 02:15 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain best practices in accordance with professional standards of food service safety. The deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen.Findings Include:On 8/25/25 at 9:36 AM, An interview with Dietary Manager D found that items in the kitchen are held for three days before being discarded. Observation of the three door True Cooler found a bag of shredded lettuce dated 8/18 to 8/20 with a best by date of 8/23. Further review of the unit found a box of Nutritional Mighty Shakes with no date to indicate discard, item states they are good 14 days from thaw. An interview with DM D found that when the Shakes get delivered, they place them directly into the refrigeration unit and go by the date the item was delivered. A review of the box of Shakes found that it was delivered on 7/31/25. About 24 shakes were left in the box. Next to the shakes were 8 small containers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in the satisfaction of living. Findings Include:On 8/25/25 at 2:08 PM, Observation of the Woods Spa room found chipping and bubbling of the wall surfaces behind the commode and along the wall leading to the sink. Further observations found portions of the wall had deteriorated and shown exposed drywall behind the commode with the vinyl coving coming off the wall. An interview with Maintenance Director (MD) I found that when the wall gets this way, she typically would scrape away the loose debris, skim coat the wall with plaster and repaint, but stated it comes right back overtime. When asked if they have ever used a non-porous wall covering in these problem areas, MD I stated she would look into using it. On 8/25/25 at 2:44 PM, Observation of the central supply room found two boxes of TwoCal nutritional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer in 1 Resident (#10) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers resulting in Resident #10 developing a stage 2 (a partial-thickness loss of skin; open wound; bedsore) pressure ulcer on her right shoulder.Findings include:Resident #10Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #10 was a female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had pertinent diagnoses which included: displaced fracture of the greater trochanter of the right femur (fractured hip), muscle weakness, and unspecified fall.Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #10, with a reference date of 8/20/2025 revealed a Section GG - Functional Ability- Mobility- score of 02- (Substantial/maximal assistance- Helper does MORE THAN HALF the effort. Helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort.) A. Roll left and right: the ability to roll from lying on back to left and right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor dietary recommendations and swallowing precautions for one Resident (#59) of 18 residents reviewed for dietary orders/needs. Findings include:Resident #59 (R59)Review of R59's medical chart revealed diagnoses including spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (severe form of cerebral palsy that affects all four limbs caused by damage to the brain during or shortly after birth with symptoms that include difficulty with feeding and swallowing), epilepsy (neurological disorder causing abnormal electrical activity in the brain), intellectual disabilities and Rett's syndrome (rare genetic mutation affecting brain development). Review of R59's medical chart revealed the following:-Order Summary dated 5/1/2024, revealed, Regular diet pureed texture, thin liquids consistency, fortified foods at each meal. -Care Plan Swallowing date initiated 10/15/24, indicated the resident was at risk for swallowing issues/aspiration related to family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to track and offer the pneumococcal vaccine for 1 Resident (#4) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: Resident #4: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #4 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included diabetes, dialysis, high blood pressure, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (impaired ability to transfer oxygen into the blood and eliminate carbon dioxide). Review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Vaccine Schedules says, .For Adults 50 years or older: Previously received both PCV13 and PPSV23 but NO PPSV23 was received at age [AGE] years or older: 1 dose PCV20 or 1 dose PCV21 at least 5 years after the last pneumococcal vaccine dose . Review of Resident #4's immunization status revealed, .PCV (Prevnar) 13 was administered on 12/22/2015 .Pneumococcal PPSV23 was administered on 08/06/2014 . In an interview on 08/27/2025 at 10:24 AM, Unit Manager (UM) S reported there was no refusal noted in the medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI 1241872.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report a resident-to-resident physical incident to the State Agency for 2 (Resident #3, Resident #5) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for continued resident to resident incidents, an incomplete investigation and residents not being protected from abusive individuals. Findings include:Resident #3 (R3)Review of the admission Record and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses including schizophrenia (disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly and is characterized by thoughts or experiences that seem out of touch of reality, disorganized speech or behavior and decreased participation in daily activities), anxiety, and adult failure to thrive. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not able to be completed due to R3 being cognitively impaired. R3 was discharged to a psychiatric hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a positioning device (a left resting hand splint) was applied per therapy recommendations for 1 (Resident #201) of 3 residents reviewed for therapy services, resulting in the potential for contracture progression (hardening of the muscles, tendons, and other tissues), pain, and decline in range of motion. Findings include: Resident #201 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #201 was a female, with pertinent diagnoses which included: vascular dementia, unspecified severity; and stiffness of unspecified hand. Review of a current Care Plan for Resident #201 revealed a focus of (Resident #201) has an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) dementia, HTN (high blood pressure), lack of coordination, balance issues . last revised on 10/18/24 with care planned interventions which included (Resident #201) is to wear left resting hand splint (a positioning device) when out of bed with a date initiated of 10/22/24. A review of Resident #201's current Order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00147923. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring, assessment and care for 1 resident (Resident #202) of 3 residents, with an indwelling catheter, reviewed for urinary catheter/UTI (urinary tract infection) care, resulting in hospitalization due to severe UTI and Sepsis. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #202 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: urinary retention. In an interview on 11/13/24 at 1:51 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) K reported that she had noticed on 11/10/24 that Resident #202 was not himself, was pale in color, not eating and drinking, had a large amount of sediment and blood in his urine, and was not using his typical sign language to communicate. LPN K reported that she had come across UA results that clearly indicated an infection, but were incomplete, so she called for the final results. LPN K reported that the results…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adaptive dining equipment was provided per physician's order for 1 (Resident #201) of 3 residents reviewed for food, resulting in the potential for difficulty with self-feeding and weight loss. Findings include: Resident #201 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #201 was a female, with pertinent diagnoses which included: vascular dementia, unspecified severity; unspecified lack of coordination; and stiffness of unspecified hand. Review of a current Physician's Order for Resident #201 revealed, Regular diet Mechanical Soft texture, Thin Liquids consistency, Divided plates for all meals .Order Status Active Order Date 5/12/2023 Start Date 5/12/2023 . Review of a current Care Plan for Resident #201 revealed a focus of (Resident #201) is at risk for nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem r/t (related to) Dementia secondary HTN (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (elevated levels of fat in the blood), vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, mild cognitive impairment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 59 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00147923. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #202) reviewed for medical records, resulting in the lack of documentation pertaining to catheter care, test results, vital signs, and resident status, as it related to an impending UTI (urinary tract infection). Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #202 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: urinary retention. In an interview on 11/13/24 at 1:51 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) K reported that she had noticed on 11/10/24 that Resident #202 was not himself, was pale in color, not eating and drinking, had a large amount of sediment and blood in his urine, and was not using his typical sign language to communicate. LPN K reported that she had come across UA (Urinalysis:urine test) results that clearly indicated an infection, but were incomplete, so…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-13 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings were held at least quarterly and the required individuals attended the meetings resulting in the potential for quality deficiencies not being identified or corrected. Findings include: Review of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting sign in sheets revealed that the facility had QAPI meetings on 10/20/2023, 12/21/2023, 1/25/2024 and 8/29/2024. The Medical Director did not attend the QAPI meeting on 1/25/2024 and on 8/29/2024. There were no QAPI meetings from 1/25/2024 to 8/29/2024. During an interview on 9/12/2024 at 11:08 PM, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A stated that there wasn't a QAPI meeting since 1/25/2024 until 8/29/2024 but she had been meeting with each department head individually and goes over information for the month. Review of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Policy with an implementation date of 3/2023 and a review date of 2/2024 revealed Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The QAPI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-13 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) completed specialized training in infection prevention and control, resulting in the potential for knowledge deficits pertaining to current infection prevention and control standards. Findings include: In an interview on 09/12/24 at 10:09 AM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported that she was the facilities IP, and ran the infection control program for the facility, with the assistance of Unit Manager (UM) LL. DON B reported that she had completed all of the modules from the CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention) IP certification training program, but did not complete the post test. DON B reported that she did not have an IP certificate. DON B reported that the facility does not have anyone from corporate overseeing their infection control program, and that it had been DON B's sole responsibility. In an interview on 09/12/24 at 10:10 AM, UM LL reported that she had not completed the IP certification training, therefore was not a certified IP. In an interview on 09/12/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-13 · tag F0943 — widespreadGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide annual required abuse prevention education for all employees. This has the potential to affect all 79 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. Findings include: Review of Preventing The Abuse of Residents with Dementia or Alzheimer's Disease In The Long-Term Care Setting: A Systematic Review, Published by The National library of Medicine, 2019, revealed . there is an increasing rate of abuse in the long-term care setting, specifically for those individuals with either dementia or Alzheimer's. Common causes and risk factors leading to this abuse include poor training . In an interview on 09/11/24 at 11:06 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) V reported (Vendor) training application was on a schedule to be completed. CNA V reported there was not much time at work to complete the trainings as would get pulled to the floor to work and/or they have their charting to do for the residents and it doesn't leave much time to complete the assigned trainings. CNA V reported they were able to access the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent, meaningful and person-centered activities for 4 of 7 residents (Resident #16, #56, #60, #178) reviewed for activities provided by the facility, resulting in the potential for loss of interaction, joy, self-esteem, growth, sense of wellbeing, autonomy, connectedness, identity, creativity, independence, pleasure, and comfort. This has the potential to affect all 15 residents residing on the dementia care unit. Findings include: Review of Facility Assessment dated 8/6/24, revealed, .Activities: Assistant 4 FT .Activity Assistant- High School Diploma or GED, prior experience in a resident activities program in a health setting preferred, prior completion of a state-approved training course or willingness to complete such a course within 6 months of employment .Previous experience within a healthcare setting .Activities Management Administration 1 Experience with persons with dementia Previous experience within a healthcare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a dietary manager with appropriate training and certifications to provide oversight of the kitchen increasing the potential for food service sanitation failures and food borne illness for all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 9/10/2024 at 9:30 AM, Dietary [NAME] (DC) H stated that they haven't had a dietary manager in the kitchen for over a month since the last dietary manager left. DC H said she wasn't sure when the Registered Dietitian (RD) comes in and if she monitors the kitchen when she is there. During an interview on 9/10/2024 at 4:58 PM, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A stated that she was aware that there isn't a manager in the kitchen and she tries to go back there to help but she is busy with her own job. During another interview on 9/11/2024 at 9:26 AM, NHA A stated that the RD comes in about 8 hours a month and doesn't monitor the kitchen when she is there.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper label and dating of foods in the kitchen resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 9/10/2024 at 9:30 AM, the cook's reach in refrigerator was observed to have the following: bag of open cheese slices in a ziploc bag with no label and date shredded pork thawing on the middle rack on a cookie sheet with ready to eat food below it The dietary aide's reach in refrigerator was observed to have the following: 1 gallon open Vit D milk jug with no label and date 1 gallon open 2% milk jug with no label and date 1 8-ounce milk in cup, covered with plastic wrap on tray with no label or date During another tour of the kitchen on 9/11/2024 at 9:26 AM, the dietary aide's reach in refrigerator was observed to have the following: cranberry concentrate in a plastic container which was open and had a use by date of 8/14/2024 The main kitchen was observed to have the following: bread…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of training for behavioral health care and services for 104 staff reviewed for behavioral health care training. This deficient practice had the potential to result in unmet behavioral health care needs and services for residents. Findings include: In an interview on 09/11/24 at 11:06 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) V reported (Vendor) training application was on a schedule to be completed. CNA V reported there was not much time at work to complete the trainings as would get pulled to the floor to work and/or they have their charting to do for the residents and it doesn't leave much time to complete the assigned trainings. CNA V reported they were able to access the application at home and could complete the training at home and would submit a slip to the timekeeper to get paid for completion of the training. In an interview on 09/11/24 at 12:34 PM, Receptionist EEE reported she would run reports, employees needed certain classes to start work on the floor for any department. Receptionist EEE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain the dignity of 1 (Resident #20) of 1 reviewed for dignity resulting in feelings of anger and frustration. Findings include: Resident #20 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #20 had pertinent diagnoses which included: osteomyelitis (an infection in a bone) and end stage renal disease with dialysis (a condition when the kidneys no longer function, and dialysis- a procedure to filter the blood of the body when the kidneys no longer function). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #20, with a reference date of 8/6/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #20 was cognitively intact. In an interview on 9/11/24 at 4:14 PM., Resident #20 reported he recently had asked to go to the hospital, and when Medical Director (MD) WW spoke with him (Resident #20) on the phone, MD 'WW's tone was short and curt when MD WW told Resident #20 he did not think he needed to go to the hospital and would not approve a transfer to the emergency room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide proper notification of a room change to 1 (Resident #20) of 1 resident reviewed for room change resulting in feelings of anger and frustration. Findings include: Resident #20 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #20 had pertinent diagnoses which included: osteomyelitis (an infection in a bone) and end stage renal disease with dialysis (a condition when the kidneys no longer function, and dialysis- a procedure to filter the blood of the body when the kidneys no longer function). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #20, with a reference date of 8/6/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #20 was cognitively intact. In an interview on 9/11/24 at 4:18 PM., Resident #20 reported he had been moved rooms after he complained to administration about a confrontation he had with his former roommate. Resident #20 reported he refused to move rooms when administration asked him to move rooms, but he still was the one that was moved. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure updated and accurate advanced directive information was in place for 2 (Resident #12 & #60) of 3 residents reviewed for advanced directives (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time), resulting in the potential for a resident's preferences for medical care to not be followed by the facility, or other healthcare providers. Findings include: Resident #12 Review of Resident #12's current Code Status Order in the electronic medical record indicated, Full Code, with a linked advance directive document from 2019 indicating Full Code, including CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation/chest compressions). Review of Code Status binder at the nurses station on [DATE] at 3:11 PM revealed Resident #12 had a green sheet of paper, indicating full code, initiate CPR, and an Advance Directive document dated [DATE] indicating that Resident #12 did not want CPR (DNR) do not resuscitate). These documents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00146430. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse (corporal punishment) by staff in 1 (Resident #37) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse, when staff covered Resident #37's mouth and sprayed water in her face, to keep Resident #37 from being heard yelling during a shower. This deficient practice resulted in increased agitation and mental anguish. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #37 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: dementia and alzheimer's disease. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #37, with a reference date of 7/27/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #37 was cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #37's Care Plan revealed, .has a behavior problem such as combativeness, refusing care, verbal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit the investigation of an allegation to the State Agency for 1 resident (Resident #21) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse resulting in the potential for the allegation to not be thoroughly investigated and for the State Agency to not be notified of the status of the allegation. Findings include: Resident #21 (R21) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R21 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of bipolar disorder, type 2 diabetes, depression and anxiety. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflected a score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R21 was cognitively intact (13 to 15 cognitively intact). Per the facility report to the State Agency on 6/20/2024, R21 alleged that someone stole a wad of ones and two fifties from his room and he called the police to file a report and notified facility staff. Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A reported the allegation to the State Agency on 6/20/2024, the day it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure PASSAR (Preadmission Screening/Annual Resident Review, 3877) documentation and OBRA Level II (3878) exemption criteria were completed appropriately for 2 (Resident #39 and #60) of 3 residents, resulting in the potential for unmet behavioral health needs. Findings include: .Under the PASRR program, all persons seeking admission to a nursing facility who are seriously mentally ill and/or have an intellectual/developmental disability are required to be evaluated to determine whether the nursing facility is the most appropriate place for them to receive services and whether they require specialized behavioral/mental health services . https://www.michigan.gov/mdhhs/keep-mi-healthy/mentalhealth/mentalhealth/obra Resident #39: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #39 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included dementia, anxiety, psychotic disorder with delusions (severe mental disorders that cause abnormal thinking and perceptions), major depressive disorder, insomnia, and traumatic brain injury (brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) care was provided for 3 (Resident #16, #61, #178) of 4 residents reviewed for ADL care, resulting in the potential for avoidable negative physical and psychosocial outcomes for resident's dependent on staff for assistance. Findings include: According to [NAME], [NAME] A.; [NAME], [NAME] Griffin; Stockert, [NAME]; Hall, [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing - E-Book (Kindle Locations 50742-50744). Elsevier Health Sciences. Kindle Edition.Personal hygiene affects patient's comfort, safety, and well-being. Hygiene care included cleaning and grooming activities that maintain personal body cleanliness and appearance. Personal hygiene activities which as taking a bath or shower and brushing and flossing the teeth also promote comfort and relaxation foster a positive self-image, promote healthy skin, and help prevent infection and disease . Resident #16: Review of an admission Record revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain professional standards in response to a change of condition in 1 (Resident #202) of 19 residents reviewed for quality of care, when facility staff failed to ensure a physician was notified of Resident #202's abnormal blood work results, and continued monitoring of the resident's condition was documented, resulting in the potential for delay in treatment of anemia (lack of healthy oxygenated blood). Findings include: During an observation on 12/10/24 at 12:21 PM Resident #202 was lying in his bed, and his skin was observed very pale (loss of color from skin). Review of Resident #202's Progress Note dated 12/2/24 at 2:30 PM revealed, Seen by (Medical Doctor (MD) C) .new order for CBC (complete blood count), CMP (comprehensive metabolic profile) d/t (due to) possible anemia, res (resident) pale. There was no other documentation related to the resident status. Review of Resident #202's Bloodwork obtained on 12/5/24, indicated that the hemoglobin level (a protein containing iron that distributes oxygen to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary care and services to prevent the development of pressure ulcers in 1 (Resident #54) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in not receiving preventative interventions and protective skin treatments per physician orders, based on a history of multiple pressure wounds, and the potential for the development of new pressure injuries. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #54 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #54's Care Plan revealed, .has actual skin issues r/t (related to) impaired physical mobility, spinal stenosis (immobility, generalized weakness. Open area to R (right) upper thigh and L (left) lower inner leg. Resolved. Date initiated: 09/15/23. Revision on: 09/05/24 .Interventions: .administer treatments as ordered and monitor effectiveness. Date initiated: 09/15/23 .Follow facility policies/protocols for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1. facility staff followed the care plan for transfer techniques for 1 (Resident #29) of 5 residents reviewed for falls, resulting in the potential for a fall, and/or an injury. Findings include: Resident #29 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #29 had pertinent diagnoses which included: Dementia, abnormalities of gait (walking) and mobility, and lack of coordination. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #29, with a reference date of 6/24/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5/15 which indicated Resident #29 was severely cognitively impaired. On 9/10/24 at 10:27 AM., Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) R was observed positioning Resident #29 into a seated position on the side of his bed, reaching under both of his arms, picking Resident #29 up and transferring him into his wheelchair that was positioned to the right of CNA R, next to Resident #29's bed, parked on top of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the 1. facility failed to develop person centered interventions and approaches for dementia care and implement a plan of care to engage and enrich the quality of life, 2. failed to provide qualified staff for dementia care for 1 (Resident #56) of 4 residents reviewed for dementia care, resulting in the potential for negatively affecting the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #56 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included dementia, anxiety, major depressive disorder, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit ( (progressive degenerative brain disorder resulting in difficulty with thinking and how someone uses language) and need for assistance with personal care. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #56, with a reference date of 7/11/24, revealed Section F: Very important to the resident to: do…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in 3 (Resident #13, Resident #69, and Resident #21) of 19 residents reviewed for complete and accurate medical records resulting in an incomplete and inaccurate documented information in the medical records. Findings include: Resident #13 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #13 had pertinent diagnoses which included: Type 2 diabetes (a condition that occurs when the body cannot regulate blood sugar). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #13, with a reference date of 6/12/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #13 was cognitively intact. On 9/11/24 at 9:31 AM., Registered Nurse (RN) JJ was observed administering Humalog (insulin) 20 units to Resident #13. In an interview on 9/11/24 at 9:35 AM., RN JJ reported that Resident #13 had an order for Novolog and had Humalog insulin available in the medication cart. RN JJ reported that the two insulins could be interchanged. Review of Physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper use of personal protective equipment during care was used for residents in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) in 2 (Resident #29 and Resident #41) of 2 reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions care resulting in the potential for the introduction of and/or the spread of infection. Findings include: Resident #29 Review of Physician Order Summary for Resident #29 revealed .Enhanced barrier Precautions due to open wound . started 7/17/2024 . Review of Care plan for Resident #29 revealed .Focus .wound management .date initiated on 7/17/24 . Interventions .enhanced barrier precautions due to open area toe . On 9/10/24 at 10:27 AM., observed signage on the door to Resident #29's room indicated that the room including a resident in enhanced barrier precautions. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) R was observed assisting Resident #29 to complete a transfer from his bed to his wheelchair. CNA R was not wearing a gown during care. In an interview on 9/10/24 at 10:30 AM., CNA R reported she had worked at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were eligible for recommended Pneumococcal vaccines were offered the vaccinations in a timely manner for 2 residents (Resident #5& #14) out of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations resulting in the potential for developing vaccine preventable disease. Findings include: Resident #5 Review of Resident #5's Immunization Record revealed historical vaccines prior to admission including, Pneumococcal PPSV23 received on 3/2/23, and PCV (Prevnar) 13 received on 11/9/15. In an interview on 09/12/24 at 10:09 AM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported that Resident #5 was over the age of 65, admitted to the facility in February 2024, and was eligible for additional doses of Pneumococcal vaccination (PCV15 or PCV20). DON B reported that the facility would order the vaccine to be administered. DON B reported that there was not education, consent, and/or declination documentation in the resident's record. Resident #14 Review of Resident #14's Immunization Record revealed one historical dose of Pneumococcal PPSV23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation related to staff COVID-19 vaccination to include, that staff were provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccine, that staff were offered the COVID-19 vaccine or information on obtaining COVID-19 vaccine, and maintain a record of current vaccination status of facility staff. Findings include: In an interview on 09/12/24 at 10:09 AM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported regarding facility staff COVID-19 vaccinations, that the vaccination is available for staff to receive. DON B reported that she did not maintain documentation of the vaccination being offered, and/or declined by facility staff. In an interview on 09/12/24 at 02:13 PM, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A reported that she was not aware that they needed to keep records of educating, offering, or track status of the facility staff's COVID-19 vaccination status.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00145073, MI00143691 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure clean and sanitary environment, resulting in the potential for cross contamination, infections, and bacterial harborage. Findings include: During an observation on 6/20/24 at 10:58 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] had dried material spilled on the floor midway through the room. During an observation on 6/20/24 at 12:54 PM, outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] on the wall there was dried liquid material running down the wall. There were chunks of dirt, like dried mud in a boot tread and scattered dirt/paper/debris on the floor outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. During an observation on 6/20/24 at 12:57 PM on the floor outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] there were pieces of straw paperand scattered dirt/debris. In front of the nurse's station, there was various dirt and debris scattered on the floor in front of it. The hallway had scattered locations of dirt/debris/pieces of straw paper scattered from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00145073. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a safe and comfortable temperature in resident rooms in 2 of 17 residents (Resident #111, #114) reviewed for homelike environment, resulting in the potential for hyperthermia and dehydration. Findings include: Review of Portable A/C Unit Placement received on 6/26/24, revealed, .6/12/13- portable that we have in house placed in room [ROOM NUMBER] .6/13/24-four units purchased and placed in rooms 18, 29, 34, and 36 .6/18 24 - Unit purchased and placed in room [ROOM NUMBER] .6/20/24- units purchased and placed in Rooms 10, 16, 20, 28, and 42 . During an observation on 6/20/24 at 10:58 AM, Resident #111's room was located at the end of the hallway and it was noted for the temperature to increase as you approached the end of the hallway were the room was located. The sun was shining through the exit doors. The room was very stuffy and hot even with fans running in the room. No AC unit was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake: MI00143691 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper infection control protocols and practices including enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 2 residents (#110, #114) of 5 residents, resulting in the increased potential for the spread of infection, bacterial harborage, cross contamination, and disease transmission for residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) dated March 20,2024, revealed, .Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities .EBP are used in conjunction with standard precautions and expand the use of PPE to donning of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs to staff hands and clothing .EBP are indicated for residents with any of the following: o Infection or colonization…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intakes: MI00145073, MI00144852, MI00145032. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted and enhanced resident dignity in 2 (Resident #111 and #101) of 17 residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in the potential of feelings of humiliation and embarrassment. Findings include: Resident #111: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #111 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included muscle weakness, muscle wasting, need for assistance with personal care, abnormal weight loss, and severe protein calorie malnutrition. Review of current Care Plan for Resident #111, revised on 12/29/2022 revealed the focus, .(Resident #111) is at risk for nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem r/t (related to) dx (diagnosis) of Malnutrition, hx of weight loss and Anorexia. I have a terminal illness. Anticipate decline in nutritional status with continued decline in overall health status . with the intervention .Offer hydration qshift (every shift) and with cares. Assist (Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement resident comprehensive care plans for 1 resident of 17 (Resident #113) reviewed for care planning resulting in a lack of service for residents to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Resident #113: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #113 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (caused by damage to or abnormalities in the brain that permanently affect body movement, muscle and coordination), epilepsy (disorder nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed causing seizures), intellectual disabilities, and Rett's syndrome (rare genetic brain disorder and development disorder with loss of motor skills, language, causes seizures, unusual hand movements, and slowed growth). Review of current Care Plan for Resident #113, revised on 10/30/23, revealed the focus, .(Resident #113) has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t cerebral palsy, epilepsy, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, Rett's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided daily personal hygiene care in 3 (Resident #110, #111, #113) of 17 residents reviewed for activities of daily living resulting in unmet personal hygiene needs. Findings include: According to [NAME], [NAME] A.; [NAME], [NAME] Griffin; Stockert, [NAME]; Hall, [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing - E-Book (Kindle Locations 50742-50744). Elsevier Health Sciences. Kindle Edition.Personal hygiene affects patient's comfort, safety, and well-being. Hygiene care included cleaning and grooming activities that maintain personal body cleanliness and appearance. Personal hygiene activities which as taking a bath or shower and brushing and flossing the teeth also promote comfort and relaxation foster a positive self-image, promote healthy skin, and help prevent infection and disease . Resident # 110: Review of current Care Plan for Resident #110, revised on 5/2/24, revealed the focus, .(Resident #110) has an ADL self-care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain sufficient hydration in 1 (Resident #111) of 17 residents reviewed for hydration resulting in the potential for dehydration, unmet resident needs, and unnecessary negative physical, mental and psychosocial outcomes. Findings include: Resident #111: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #111 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included muscle weakness, muscle wasting, need for assistance with personal care, abnormal weight loss, and severe protein calorie malnutrition. Review of current Care Plan for Resident #111, revised on 12/29/2022 revealed the focus, .(Resident #111) is at risk for nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem r/t (related to) dx (diagnosis) of Malnutrition, hx of weight loss and Anorexia. I have a terminal illness. Anticipate decline in nutritional status with continued decline in overall health status . with the intervention .Offer hydration qshift (every shift) and with cares. Assist (Resident #111) as needed with hydration and keep hydration within…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00142839 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain ensure accurate medical records for 1 resident (Resident #101) of 9 sampled residents reviewed for accurate medical records, resulting in inaccurate documentation of allergies. Findings include: Resident #101 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 had pertinent diagnoses which included: dependence on renal dialysis (treatment to remove waste and excess water from the body when the kidneys are no longer able to do it), muscle weakness, and urinary tract infection. Review of Allergies for Resident #101 revealed No Known Allergies. Review of Census for Resident #101 revealed 12/29/23 In house, 1/2/24 in house, 1/20/24 in house, and 2/16/24 stop billing. Indicating Resident #101 resided in the facility from [DATE] until discharge on [DATE]. Review of Transfer Care Record from (Name Omitted) acute care hospital, printed on 12/29/24 at 5:24 PM., revealed .Allergies Not on File. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #MI00142839 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and update person centered care plans in 3 (Resident #101, Resident #104, and Resident #109) of 4 residents reviewed for care planning, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs and a potential for injury to resident. Findings include: Resident #101 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 had pertinent diagnoses which included: dependence on renal dialysis (treatment to remove waste and excess water from the body when the kidneys are no longer able to do it), muscle weakness, and urinary tract infection. Review of Care Plan for Resident #101 revealed no care plan related to allergies and Resident #101 was listed as having no known allergies. Review of Transfer Care Record from (Name Omitted) acute care hospital, printed on 12/29/24 at 5:24 PM., revealed .Allergies Not on File. Review of Discharge Service Communication dated 2/23/24 at 13:49 PM., revealed .Allergies . allergen-penicillin reaction-anaphylaxis, allergen-morphine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #MI00142839 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe transfers of residents with gait belt use during transfer and two staff members during mechanical lift transfer in two (Resident #102 and Resident #109) of four residents reviewed for transfers, resulting in the potential for injury during transfer. Findings include: Resident #102 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #102 had pertinent diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's disease with late onset, lack of coordination, and unsteadiness of feet. During an observation and interview on 3/5/24 at 10:13 AM., Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) G placed her hands/arms into Resident #102's armpits, with the palm of her hand against Resident #102's back near his shoulder blades and lifted Resident #102 from a seated position in his wheelchair (parked parallel to his bed) and transferred Resident #102 onto his bed. CNA G did not use a gait belt during the transfer. CNA G reported that she can find transfer status information for a resident in their care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #MI00142839. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that (1) pre and post dialysis treatment assessment and monitoring communication between themselves (the facility) and the dialysis provider (Name Omitted) was maintained and (2) a physician order was in place for dialysis treatments in 2 (Resident #101 and Resident #104) of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis services, resulting in the potential for unrecognized adverse reactions or resident decline related to dialysis treatments and the disruption in the continuity of care. Findings include: Resident #101 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 had pertinent diagnoses which included: dependence on renal dialysis (treatment to remove waste and excess water from the body when the kidneys are no longer able to do it), muscle weakness, and urinary tract infection. Resident #104 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #104 had pertinent diagnoses which included: End stage renal disease (decreased function of the kidneys), sepsis (full system infection),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted a dignified dining experience for 5 residents (R#104, #108, #109, #110, #111, #112) of 13 residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in feelings of disappointment with the dining experiences. Findings include: Resident #104: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #104 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included dementia, anxiety, adult failure to thrive, need for assistance with personal care, diabetes, and sacral pressure ulcer stage 3. Resident #108: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #108 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (caused by damage to or abnormalities in the brain that permanently affect body movement, muscle and coordination), epilepsy (disorder nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed causing seizures), intellectual disabilities, and rett's syndrome (rare genetic brain disorder and development disorder with loss of motor skills, language, causes seizures, unusual hand movements, and slowed growth). Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the failed to maintain accurate medical records for 1 of (Resident #100) of 12 residents reviewed for comprehensive and accurate medical records, resulting in an inaccurate reflection of the resident's medical treatments administered resulting in the potential for providers to not have an accurate picture of resident status and condition. Findings include: Resident #100 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #100, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included muscle weakness. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #100, with a reference date of 11/27/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #100 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #100's Orders revealed, Cleanse right buttock with NS (normal saline) pat dry apply xeroform (dressing cover for wounds) to open / excoriated area cover with bordered gauze. Change daily and as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00142287 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to facilitate a resident initiated discharge per resident choice, in 1 of 1 residents (Resident #102) reviewed for resident initiated discharge, resulting in the resident's delay in discharge and the accumulation of a bill for services which were no longer required. Findings include: Resident #102: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #102 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included diabetes, diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage which can occur with diabetes), fracture of right tibia (larger lower leg weight bearing bone between knee and foot), wound right great toe, falls, heart disease, muscle weakness, retention of urine (difficulty urinating), acquired absence of left leg below knee, peripheral vascular disease (narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), and malignant neoplasm of prostate (cancer in the prostate). Review of Care Management Assessment completed by referring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00142287. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete accurate assessments for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #102) reviewed for assessments, resulting in an inaccurate reflection of the resident's status and the potential for impaired medical and functional problems due to unidentified needs. Findings include: .Gerontological nursing provides care that addresses mutually established goals for an older adult, his or her family, and health care team members. A comprehensive assessment, including strengths, limitations, and resources, provides a baseline of the older adult's health and functional status. Nursing diagnoses and interventions are selected to either maintain or enhance physical abilities and activity .and to create environments for psychosocial and spiritual well-being . [NAME], [NAME] A.; [NAME], [NAME] Griffin; Stockert, [NAME]; Hall, [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing, Tenth Edition - E-Book (Kindle Location 11794 of 76897). Elsevier Health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00142287 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to completely assess and establish a baseline care plan for 1 resident (Resident #102) of 13 residents reviewed for baseline care plans, that included measurable goals, and interventions to address priority risk factors and individual needs resulting in the potential for ineffective care and continuity of care to be provided to the resident. Findings include: Resident #102: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #102 was a male admitted on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included diabetes, diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage which can occur with diabetes), fracture of right tibia (larger lower leg weight bearing bone between knee and foot), wound right great toe, falls, heart disease, muscle weakness, retention of urine (difficulty urinating), acquired absence of left leg below knee, peripheral vascular disease (narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), and malignant neoplasm of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement resident comprehensive care plans for 1 resident (Resident #108) of 9 residents reviewed for care planning, resulting in a lack of service for residents to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Resident #108: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #108 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (caused by damage to or abnormalities in the brain that permanently affect body movement, muscle and coordination), epilepsy (disorder nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed causing seizures), intellectual disabilities, and rett's syndrome (rare genetic brain disorder and development disorder with loss of motor skills, language, causes seizures, unusual hand movements, and slowed growth). Review of current Care Plan for Resident #108, revised on 10/27/23, revealed the focus, .(Resident #108) has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) cerebral palsy, epilepsy, generalized anxiety disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00142287. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the failed to follow professional standards of nursing practice in 1 (Resident #102) of 13 residents reviewed for standards of practice when the facility 1). failed to ensure orders were in place for catheter care and monitoring 2.) failed to ensure Resident #102's wound was assessed and treated and 3.) failed to ensure Resident #102 received follow up care with an orthopedic surgeon as recommended resulting in the potential for worsening of health conditions. Findings include: Resident #102: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #102 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included diabetes, diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage which can occur with diabetes), fracture of right tibia (larger lower leg weight bearing bone between knee and foot), wound right great toe, falls, heart disease, muscle weakness, retention of urine (difficulty urinating), acquired absence of left leg below knee, peripheral vascular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00142287 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistance with Activities for Daily Living (ADL) care was provided for 2 (Resident #102 and #108) of 9 residents reviewed for ADL care, resulting in the potential for avoidable negative physical and psychosocial outcomes for residents who are dependent on staff for assistance. Findings include: Resident #102: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #102 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included diabetes, diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage which can occur with diabetes), fracture of right tibia (larger lower leg weight bearing bone between knee and foot), wound right great toe, falls, heart disease, muscle weakness, retention of urine (difficulty urinating), acquired absence of left leg below knee, peripheral vascular disease (narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), and malignant neoplasm of prostate (cancer in the prostate). Review of current Care Plan for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00142075 and MI00142287. Based on interview and record review, the failed to ensure quality of care for 2 (Resident #101 and #102) of 13 residents reviewed for quality of care when the facility failed to 1.) ensure assessment and treatment were completed for reported pain and elevated blood glucose levels for Resident #101 and 2.) ensure diabetic monitoring was in place for Resident #102 resulting in the lack of assessment, monitoring, and documentation and the potential for the worsening of a medical condition and the delay in treatment. Findings include: Resident #101 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included muscle weakness and type 2 diabetes. During an interview on 2/15/24 at 11:34 AM, Family Member (FM) P reported that Resident #101 began reporting left foot pain on 12/24/23. FM P reported that Resident #101 had reported her foot pain to staff, but they were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00138391 and MI00142287. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess, monitor, treat, and implement interventions for a residents with pressure ulcers for 2 (Resident #100 and Resident #102) of 6 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers resulting in the potential for worsening condition of a pressure ulcer. Findings include: Resident #100 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #100, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included muscle weakness. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #100, with a reference date of 11/27/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #100 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #100's Orders revealed, Cleanse right buttock with NS (normal saline) pat dry apply xeroform (dressing cover for wounds) to open / excoriated area cover with bordered gauze. Change daily and as needed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00142075. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a medical evaluation of resident's condition, review the appropriateness of the resident's medical treatment, and implement orders for 1 (Resident #101) of 8 residents reviewed for physician orders and treatment resulting in Resident #101 experiencing unresolved pain and untreated high blood glucose levels. Findings include: Resident #101 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included muscle weakness and type 2 diabetes. During an interview on 2/15/24 at 11:34 AM, Family Member (FM) P reported that Resident #101 began reporting left foot pain on 12/24/23. FM P reported that Resident #101 had reported her foot pain to staff, but they were not addressing the concern. FM P reported that Resident #101's foot began to swell, was painful to touch, and she was unable to walk. FM P reported that on 12/28/23 an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely physician visits for 1 resident (Resident #102) out of 9 residents reviewed, resulting in the potential for unmet medical needs. Findings include: Resident #102: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #102 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included diabetes, diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage which can occur with diabetes), fracture of right tibia (larger lower leg weight bearing bone between knee and foot), wound right great toe, falls, heart disease, muscle weakness, retention of urine (difficulty urinating), acquired absence of left leg below knee, peripheral vascular disease (narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), and malignant neoplasm of prostate (cancer in the prostate). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #102, with a reference date of 11/20/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated Resident #102 was cognitively intact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Properly store raw animal product in order to reduce the risk of contamination; 2. Provide accurate test strips; 3. Ensure proper working order of the hot water sanitizing dish machine; 4. Ensure cleanliness of ice scoop holder; 5. Properly air-dry pots and pans; and 6. Ensure general cleanliness of kitchen exhaust ventilation. These conditions resulted in an increased risk of contaminated foods and an increased risk of food borne illness that affected 53 residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include: 1. During the initial tour of the kitchen, starting at 11:35 AM on 7/17/23, observation of the two door True cooler found raw chicken thawing on the second to bottom shelf over pork loin and bacon. An interview with [NAME] U, found that staff should store raw animal products according to the poster on the front of the door. A review of the poster found that chicken and poultry products should be stored on the bottom shelf, under ingredients that require lower cooking temperatures and food that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control practices related to 1. hand hygiene while providing assistance with meals. 2. hand hygiene during medication admininstration. 3. Donning personal protective equipment before entering a resident's room who was on transmission based precautions. and 4. Ensuring resident shared equipment was sanitized after use, for 8 (Resident #23, #50, #51, #57, #3, #20, #412, and #313) out of 15 residents reviewed for infection control, resulting in the potential for the transmission/transfer of pathogenic organisms and cross contamination between residents. Findings include: During an observation on 07/17/23 at 12:16 PM, Maintenance Director R was observed going room to room checking the water temperatures in the bathroom sinks. MD R was observed not performing hand hygiene prior to entering a room and not performing hand hygiene when he exited a room prior to going in another room. MD R used his shirt to wipe off…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertians to intake: MI00132310. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to 1. ensure a clean, comfortable and homelike environment 2. ensure proper storage of items underneath sinks/waste water lines, and contain open and dripping ventilation/pipes in laundry and dry storage were sealed and not leaking resulting in the potential for cross contamination, bacterial harborage and feelings of dissatisfaction for residents residing in the facility. Findings include: In an observation on 7/19/23 at 9:57 AM., room [ROOM NUMBER] window to the outside on the right-hand side had a large linear crack in the glass which ran across the entire window. The entire window was heavily soiled on the inside with a film, noted on the outside a film of dried water spots covering the entire surface of the window. In an observation on 7/19/23 at 10:00 AM., room [ROOM NUMBER] window inside and out was heavily soiled with a thick film on the inside, and heavy accumulation of water spots on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted and enhanced resident dignity in 1 (Resident #6) of 3 residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in the likelihood of feelings of humiliation, embarrassment, and a negative psychosocial outcome for the resident impacting their quality of life. Findings include: Resident #6: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #6 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia (damage to the brain responsible for production and comprehension of speech), anemia (blood doesn't have enough red blood cells), muscle weakness, and diabetes. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #6, with a reference date of 6/12/23 revealed, .Section G: Eating: Extensive Assistance, One person Assist . Review of current Care Plan for Resident #6, revised on 12/28/22, revealed the focus, .(Resident #6) has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) Alzheimer's, Dementia, Impaired balance, Limited mobility . with the intervention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with their preferred practice to maintain hygiene for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for self-determination, resulting in feelings of frustration, feeling dirty and the potential for the residents to not meet their highest practicable well-being. Findings include: Resident #25 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #25, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: heart failure. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #25, with a reference date of 5/17/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #25 was cognitively intact. Further review of Resident #25's MDS assessment revealed: G-Functional Status-How resident takes full-body bath/shower, sponge bath, and transfers in/out of tub/shower (excludes washing of back and hair) . Code for most dependent in self-performance and support. Personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-19 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) discharge assessment was transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for 1 (Resident #54) of 15 sampled residents, resulting in the potential for inaccurate tracking of the resident's assessment and discharge status. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a Progress Note dated 3/7/23 at 4:52 PM for Resident #54 revealed, Note Text: Pleasantly confused. Appetite good. Discharge today, daughter transporting. Daughter read and signed discharge papers. Medications called and faxed to (pharmacy name omitted) . Review of Resident #54's electronic medical record MDS Screen revealed a Discharge Return Not Anticipated . MDS with a reference date of 3/7/23 and a status of Completed (the status was not Accepted to indicate it had been transmitted successfully and accepted by CMS). In an interview on 7/19/23 at 9:04 AM, Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #60) reviewed for closed records, resulting in an inaccurate reflection of the resident's disposition upon discharge from the facility. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #60 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #60, with a reference date of 5/31/23, indicated that Resident #60 discharged on 5/31/23 to an Acute Hospital. Review of Resident #60's Discharge Note dated 5/26/2023 at 10:48 AM revealed, Note Text: Resident and his family plans to have him dc to (Assisted Living Facility name omitted) on 5/31/2023 with homecare and a wheelchair. Family agrees to pay privately for a few days and will pay balance at discharge. Review of Resident #60's Nurses Note dated 5/31/2023 at 2:55 PM revealed, Nursing Note Text: Alert and oriented. Unusually anxious about discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for administering a subcutaneous injection of insulin in 1 of 1 resident (Resident #412) reviewed for standards of practice, resulting in the potential for inaccurate dose administration. Finding include: Resident # 412 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #412, a male with pertinent diagnoses which included: Type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, protein-calorie malnutrition, and heart disease. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #412, with a reference date of 7/18/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12/15 which indicated Resident #412 was cognitively intact. During an observation on 7/18/23 at 12:00 PM., Registered Nurse (RN) N cleansed Resident #412's right deltoid (top part of the arm at the shoulder) area with an alcohol swab, pressed needle attached to insulin pen with pressure into the deltoid area to inject…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00132310 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was consistently provided with showers/bathing for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for activities of daily living, resulting in unmet personal hygiene needs with the potential for isolation, psychosocial harm, skin breakdown, harboring infection, and decreased self-esteem. Findings include: Resident #18: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #18 was a male with pertinent diagnoses which included traumatic brain injury (TBI), heart failure, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, abnormal posture, anxiety, morbid obesity, mild cognitive impairment, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #18, with a reference date of 5/29/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated Resident #18 was cognitively intact. Review of current Care Plan for Resident #18,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a timely, comprehensive nutritional assessment and follow-up was completed for 1 (Resident #20) of 1 newly admitted resident reviewed nutritional status, resulting in a newly admited resident with indicators of significant nutritional risk not being comprehensively assessed, and the potential for unidentified nutritional status decline. Findings include: Resident #20 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #20, a female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: Abscess of the buttock, pressure injury of the coccyx (lowest part of the back above the tailbone), dependence of renal dialysis (a blood purifying treatment), kidney failure, and type 2 diabetes (a condition where the body is not able to properly use sugar from the blood). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #20, with a reference date of 6/28/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-19 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) received trauma informed care for 2 (Resident #7 and Resident #26) of 15 sampled residents resulting in the potential for exposure to trauma triggers and re-traumatization. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #7 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included PTSD. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #7, with a reference date of 5/23/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident # 7 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #7's Care Plan did not reveal any care planned focus areas related to Resident #7's PTSD diagnosis. Review of Resident #7's Behavioral health progress notes from a local behavioral health provider indicated that Resident #7 was being treated for behavioral health services, but Resident #7's PTSD diagnosis had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to track and offer the pneumococcal vaccine for 1 (Resident #40) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations, resulting in a delay in Resident #40 being given the opportunity to receive or decline the pneumococcal vaccination. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #40 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Immunization screen in Resident #40's electronic medical record revealed no evidence that a pneumococcal vaccination had been offered to or declined by Resident #40, or their representative, and no evidence of tracking of historical data of previous pneumococcal immunization for Resident #40. On 7/18/23 at 11:35 AM, State Agency (SA) requested evidence of administration or declination of pneumococcal vaccination for Resident #40 from facility administration. In an interview on 7/19/23 at 11:04, Director of Nursing, Infection Control and Preventionist (DONICP) B reported pneumococcal vaccination status of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-09-13 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure annual performance evaluations for certified nursing assistants were completed, resulting in the potential for the delivery of nursing and related services that does not support or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Review of The Essentials Guide to Healthcare Performance Reviews, www.hrforhealth.com. 2024, revealed The benefits of healthcare performance reviews go beyond creating a better experience for your team .the most important [benefit) is performance reviews lead to improved performance .greater productivity and better overall experience for your patients. Review of the Facility Assessment dated 8/2024, revealed, .CNA: 31 FT (full time), 8 PT (part time) and 8 PRN (As needed) . Total of 47 CNAs employed by the facility. Review of Employee Personnel Files on 09/11/24 at 03:12 PM, revealed, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) V, CNA W and CNA T had not received their annual performance evaluations. In an interview on 09/11/24 at 11:06 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-25 for 77 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ORCHARDS MICHIGAN — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 1.7 | +2.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| GUTMAN, ISAAC | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| HOFFMAN, ALEXANDER | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| KORNFELD, ROBERT | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| TAUB, JACOB | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/28/2026 |
| WHITE LAKE HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| FRANCO, RAYANN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| SANBORN, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
| ZIBOH, MAUREEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235598. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.