No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Riverside Nursing Centre

415 Friant Street, Grand Haven, MI 49417 · For profit - Corporation · 34 certified beds · (616) 842-4120 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (616) 842-4120 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Jul 20251 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
PrivaMD1.1 mi
16986 Robbins Rd Ste 180 · (616) 213-0253 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
(616) 842-4360 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1121 Washington Ave · (616) 516-9953 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1864 Pennoyer Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1805 Waverly Ave · (616) 846-1940

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.0%10.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.7%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.9%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.9%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.0%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.2%12.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.8%19.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.5%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.7%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.6%14.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.8%79.5%79.4%better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 6.5–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.72
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.17
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
71.0%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 34 beds and averages 27.4 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-12)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-04)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 1275497 and 1275498. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1) operationalize policies and procedures, 2) provide services as documented, 3) notify physician of wounds with oversight, 3) timely interventions of wounds, and 4) implement care plan interventions of wounds for 3 residents (R5, R6, and R9) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the development and worsening of pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of a policy titled Pressure Injury Prevention and Care, last reviewed 1/2025 revealed: 1. Nurses will complete the Skin Body Assessment Observation upon admission/readmission, then weekly and as needed. 2. Nurses will complete Braden Scale for residents on admission/readmission, weekly for 4 weeks, quarterly, at time of new pressure injury identification, and as needed. 5. Interventions will be implemented, and care planned to prevent pressure injury development or to promote pressure injury resolution. 6. Pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation is related to intake #2973235Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat two of four residents (Resident # 103 and an unidentified resident) with dignity and respect when assisting them with breakfast. Findings:Resident #103 (R103)Review of a Face Sheet revealed R103 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of traumatic brain injury, quadriplegia, cognitive communication deficit, and need for assistance with personal care which included one staff person required to feed the resident. During an observation on 04/16/26 at 8:50 AM, certified nurse aide (CNA) D stood next to R103's left side of the bed and the breakfast tray and (presumably) CNA's D's cell phone sat on the overbed table. CNA D offered R103 a bite of food and then looked down at the cell phone and scrolled through the screen. At 8:51 AM, CNA D offered R103 another bite of food and then continued to scroll through the cell phone. At no time during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow contact precautions for one of three resident's (Resident #104) reviewed for infection control practices.Findings:Resident #104 (R104)Review of a Face Sheet revealed R104 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of adult failure to thrive. During an observation on 04/16/26 at 9:31 AM, a contact precautions sign hung outside R104's room that directed staff .gown and gloves to be worn each time room entry is made. Review of a physician order summary for R104 reflected .contact precautions due to confirmed diagnoses of shingles. During an observation on 04/16/26 at 12:30 PM, certified nurse aide (CNA) C assisted R104 with lunch as the resident laid in bed. CNA C did not have on a gown or gloves nor any PPE (personal protection equipment). During an interview on 04/16/26 at 12:35 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) E indicated that the expectation for all staff was to follow posted contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP), resulting in the potential for increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility. Findings include:On 02/09/2026 at 2:30PM, during interview with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) T it was found that MS T had not participated in a Water Management Team meeting, a policy review or a risk assessment during employment at facility. MS T has been with the facility since October 2025. Review of the maintenance department's Water Management Plan Binder indicates there is no documentation for minutes from a Water Management Team meeting, policy review or risk assessment occurring within the past twelve months.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain general cleanliness and repair of premises and equipment. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in satisfaction of living for residents. Findings Include:On 02/09/2026 at 11:46AM, food debris observed on base of a lift, stored in [NAME] hallway. Food debris consisted of food ground into the mat sitting in indented area of base and loose food particles. During facility walkthrough on 02/09/2026 at 2:00PM, with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) T, food debris was observed on matting at base of equipment. It appears this is the same food debris seen in the morning. MS T stated general cleaning of equipment was a responsibility for the hall's resident care staff, but housekeeping would clean the equipment if equipment could not be cleaned with the cleaning wipes provided for the equipment. On 02/09/2026 at 12:57PM, observed baseboard heater cover was not installed in room [ROOM NUMBER], leaving approximately 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #s 2655849 and 2663547.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #10 and #17), and residents in attendance at the resident group meeting, reviewed for resident rights, dignity and respect.Findings: Resident #10 (R10) Review of an admission Record revealed R10 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: diabetes and hypertension Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R10, with a reference date of 12/24/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R15 was cognitively intact. Review of a Facility Incident Report received via online submission on 10/24/25 revealed, (R10) made an allegation that a staff member took a long time to assist her to the bathroom and that the staff member said, I'm not doing this and left the resident there.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to formulate and complete advanced directives in a timely manner for 4 of 17 residents (R2, R4, R6, and R24) reviewed for advanced directives. Findings include: R2 A review of R2's Face Sheet, dated 2/11/26, revealed R2 was a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included a compression fracture of the third thoracic vertebra, depression, and generalized muscle weakness. A review of R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used for assessing a resident's care needs), dated 1/28/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a scale used to determine a resident's cognitive status) score of 15 which revealed R2 was cognitively intact. A review of R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), dated 1/13/26 to 2/9/26, failed to reveal if R2 had been offered to formulate an advanced directive and/or complete an advanced directive (i.e., there was not any completed advanced directive documentation in R2's EMR. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provider was immediately notified of a change in resident medical condition for 4 of 12 residents (Resident #8, #10, #30, and #5), reviewed for notification of change.Findings:Resident #8 (R8)Review of an admission Record revealed R8 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: asthma and epilepsy.Review of the provider Concerns/Communication log with an entry dated 1/30/26 which revealed, (R8) Concern: saturations (oxygen level) for day shift were in the 50's.Team Action/Date: Oxygen was 50!!Review of Fundamentals of Nursing ([NAME] and [NAME]) 11th edition revealed, Pulse oximetry (SpO2) Normal: SpO2 95% (greater than or equal to 95%).Review of R8's Nursing Progress Note dated 02/03/2026 at 03:19 PM revealed, (nurse practitioner) in to see (R8) today per note in providers' book that O2 sat on 1/31/26 was in the 50s.Review of R8's provider Progress Note dated 02/03/2026 at 06:17…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) ensure medications and treatments were administered/completed following the physician order for 6 residents (Resident #21, #18, #6, #31, #17, and #5) out of 12 residents reviewed for nursing professional standards of practice.Findings:Resident #17 (R17) Review of a Face Sheet revealed R17 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: Type 1 Diabetes. Review of R17's Physicians Orders revealed an active order for insulin aspart U-100, before meals at 9:15AM, 12:15PM, and 5:00PM. During a medication administration observation on 02-10-2026 at 8:04 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B was observed preparing to administer insulin Aspart to R17. LPN B attached a new pen needle to the insulin pen, dialed the ordered insulin amount and administered the insulin to R17. LPN B did not dial a priming dose or expel insulin into the needle to ensure patency of the needle. In an Interview on 02-10-2026…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistance with Activities for Daily Living (ADL) care was consistently provided for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #17 and #18) and residents in attendance at the resident group meeting, reviewed for ADL care.Findings:Resident #17 (R17) Review of a Face Sheet revealed R17 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure, chronic kidney disease, type II diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, difficulty in walking, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used for assessing a resident's care needs) assessment for R17, with a reference date of 12/02/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a scale used to determine a resident's cognitive status) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R17 was cognitively intact. Review of a current (Activities of Daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2741552Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, and 2.) ensure that controlled pain medications were administered following provider orders and the residents' goals and preferences for 4 of 12 residents (Resident #24, R6, R1, and R20) and residents in attendance at the resident group meeting, reviewed for pain management.Findings:Resident #24 (R24)Review of an admission Record revealed R24 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asthma.Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R24, with a reference date of 1/21/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R24 was cognitively intact. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the physician failed to address pharmacy recommendations, the facility failed to implement physician approved pharmacy recommendations, and/or the facility failed to implement physician approved pharmacy recommendations timely for 4 of 5 residents (R2, R3, R12, and R24) reviewed for monthly pharmacy medication regimen reviews. Findings include: R2 A review of R2's Face Sheet, dated 2/11/26, revealed R2 was a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety. A review of R2's Consultation Report, dated 1/22/26, revealed the pharmacist recommended that the physician either discontinue the as needed (prn) alprazolam (a medication for anxiety) or add a stop date not to exceed 14 days from the time it was initiated. The physician signed on 1/27/26 that they accepted the recommendation. A review of R2's Physician Order Report, dated 1/11/26 to 2/11/26, failed to reveal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders without errors for 2 (R17 and R5) of the 7 residents observed during the medication administration task. This resulted in a facility medication error rate of 10.34% (3 errors out of 29 opportunities).Findings include:Resident #17 (R17 Review of a Face Sheet revealed R17 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: Type 1 Diabetes. Review of R17's Physicians Orders revealed an active order for insulin aspart U-100, before meals at 9:15AM, 12:15PM, and 5:00PM.During a medication administration observation on 02-10-2026 at 8:04 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B was observed preparing to administer insulin Aspart to R17. LPN B attached a new pen needle to the insulin pen, dialed the ordered insulin amount and administered the insulin to R17. LPN B did not dial a priming dose or expel insulin into the needle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were no expired medications and ensure opened medications were dated in one of one medication cart and in one of one medication storage room. Findings include: During an observation on 2/10/2026 at 7:00 AM, the following were noted in the medication room: (a) an opened Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative vial (used for skin testing to detect if a person has been infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis or TB) vial was observed in the refrigerator opened and undated (Per Physician Desk Reference (PDR) recommend vial should be discarded 30 days after opened) and (b) four bottles of Famotidine 20mg (milligram) tablets with 300 tablets in each bottle that expired January 2026. During an observation on 2/10/2026 at 7:15 AM, the following were noted in the medication cart: (a) an opened Albuterol inhaler with 196 puffs remaining with no date indicating the date it was opened (Per PDR recommend inhaler should be discarded 90 days after opened), (b) Gas Relief 125 mg bottle with expiration date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices for storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors. Findings include: On 02/09/2026 at 10:32AM, at time of interview Dietary Supervisor (DS) S states they do not have the key to the refrigerator and freezer; and DS S left to the nurse's station to obtain the key to open the doors of refrigerator and freezer. DS S, noted dietary staff is not responsible for dating food or discarding food from the residents' refrigerator. Observed the following items, in the resident's refrigerator, without a date of when food was received and placed in refrigerator: cream-based soup with room number only on container, opened jar of Tostitos cheese dip, oatmeal in kitchen dishware. Record review of the facility's policy, Foods Brought in to Resident Education Material, #5 Cooked food items will be labeled with the resident's name and date of delivery. If the food items need refrigeration/freezing, the items will be placed in a resident designated refrigerator/freezer.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly assess one resident (R9) out of twelve reviewed for self-administration of medications.Findings include:Review of a Face Sheet revealed R9 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which include type II diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. In an observation on 2/10/2026 at 8:42 AM R9 was observed to have a bottle of Flonase nasal spray (24-hour nasal spray that treats allergy symptoms) at the bedside. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B asked R9 if she had already administered the medication and R9 answered that she was unsure why the Flonase nasal spray was at bedside. LPN B administered the Flonase nasal spray as physician ordered and placed the Flonase into the medication cart.Review of a Physician Order dated 03/05/2025 Flonase Allergy Relief (fluticasone propionate) spray, 50 micrograms one spray each nostril every morning. Further review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident with written notice of the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for 1 of 2 residents (R27) reviewed for hospital transfers. Findings include: A review of R27's Face Sheet, dated 2/12/26, revealed R27 was a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included obstruction of the bile duct and weakness, A review of R27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used for assessing a resident's care needs), dated 1/9/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a scale used to determine a resident's cognitive status) score of 15 which revealed R27 was cognitively intact.A review of an Interdisciplinary Team note, dated 1/24/26 for 1/19/26, revealed R27 had been transferred to the hospital emergency room on 1/18/26 for evaluation and treatment of excessive purulent drainage (thick, milky, or opaque fluid often having a foul odor that signifies an active infection) from R27's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 1 Screenings timely for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (R2 and R12). Findings include:R12 Review of a Face Sheet revealed R12 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which include schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, and type II diabetes. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used for assessing a resident's care needs) assessment for R12, with a reference date of 12/22/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a scale used to determine a resident's cognitive status) score of 04, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R12 had severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed R12 had received an antipsychotic and an antidepressant within the 7-day assessment period. Review of the electronic medical record revealed a PASARR Level 1 Screening dated 09/22/2025 marked hospital exemption discharge which meant that R12 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility policy for pressure injury/wound management for 3 of 12 residents (Resident #21, #17, and #6) reviewed for alterations in skin integrity.Findings:Resident #21 (R21)Review of an admission Record revealed R21 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: Chronic Diastolic Heart Failure.Review of R21's Order Summary dated 10/2/25 until 1/19/26 revealed, Skin Assessment Weekly.Review of R21's weekly Skin Body Assessment dated 12/18/25 revealed, LLE (left lower extremity) ulcer known finding treatment in place .There were no weekly Skin Body Assessment completed on 12/25/25 or on 1/1/26.Review of R21's Skin Body Assessment dated 1/8/26 revealed, .some excoriation on buttocks bilateral cream applied house stock barrier cream on open areas on buttock noted.Review of R21's Electronic Health Record revealed no documentation that the Director of Nursing, the provider, or the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete medical records for 3 of 12 sample residents (R2, R3, and R27). Findings include: R2 A review of R2's Face Sheet, dated 2/11/26, revealed R2 was a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety. A review of R2's electronic medical record (EMR), dated 1/13/26 to 2/9/26, failed to reveal any advanced directive documentation that would indicate if R2 had been offered to formulate an advanced directive and/or complete an advanced directive. A second review of R2's EMR, dated 1/13/26 to 2/9/26, failed to reveal if R2 had a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 1 Screening (a screening that evaluates all applicants for serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability in order to ensure that they receive the appropriate care and services that they require) performed prior to admission. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-11 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — widespread
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 1275500. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) ensure care conferences were completed and 2.) ensure residents/their representatives participated in their cares at the facility for 3 residents (R2, R4, and R8) of 4 residents reviewed for care conferences. This deficient practice affects all 33 residents who reside in the facility.Findings include: Resident #2 (R2)Review of a Face Sheet for R2 revealed she originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In an interview on 7/8/25 at 9:03 AM, Family Member (FM) I reported concerns about R2 needing to see the eye doctor for a few months and as of last month R2 needed new glasses. FM I reported he had talked to the Social Worker (SW) B several times in the past few months about getting R2 an appointment with the in-house optician and had yet to hear anything. FM I reported he finally gave up and came to the facility and took R2 himself to the eye doctor with no assistance from the facility. FM I had concerns…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-11 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intakes 1275500, 1275498, and 1275497. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer the facility and use its resources effectively and efficiently to ensure resident cares and services met the residents needs to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice affects all 33 residents who reside at the facility. Findings include: Review of the Administrator/Administration Job Description revealed: GENERAL PURPOSE: Direct the day-to-day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state and local standards, guidelines and regulations that govern long term care facilities, as well as all company policies to assure that the highest degree of quality care can be provided to the residents at all times. ESSENTIAL JOB FUNCTIONS: A. Administrative and Supervisory Functions, . C. Personnel Functions, . D. Resident's Rights Functions, . E. Continuous Quality Improvement Functions, . OTHER FUNCTIONS: A. Committee Functions, . C. Staff Development Functions, . In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-11 · tag F0841 — widespread
    Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 1275500, 1275498, and 1275497. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director's involvement in the collaboration, coordination, and oversight of cares and services for 6 residents (R2, R4, R5, R6, R8, and R9), of 6 residents reviewed for physician involvement. This deficient practice affects all 33 residents who reside at the facility. Ancillary Services for Vision CareResident #2 (R2)Review of a Face Sheet for R2 revealed she originally admitted to the facility on [DATE].In an interview on 7/8/25 at 9:03 AM, Family Member (FM) I reported concerns about R2 needing to see the eye doctor for a few months and as of last month R2 needed new glasses. FM I reported he had talked to the Social Worker (SW) B several times in the past few months about getting R2 an appointment with the in-house optician and had yet to hear anything. On 6/10/25 he came to the facility and R2's glasses were missing, and she was wearing some random pair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 1275499, 1275500, 1275498, and 1275497. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize policies and procedures for an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program by not monitoring, identifying, developing and promptly implementing corrective actions. This deficient practice affects all 33 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: Review of a policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) dated 11/2022 (which does not show it is annually reviewed/revised) revealed: It is the policy of this facility to develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life and addresses all the care and unique services the facility provides. 3. The QAPI plan will address the following elements:a. Design and scope of the facility's QAPI program and QAA Committee responsibilities and actions.b. Policies and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-11 · tag F0710 — pattern
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 1275500, 1275498, and 1275497. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) follow physician orders to obtain labs and change medication orders for 1 resident (R2) and 2.) ensure physician supervision of wounds for three residents (R5, R6, and R9), of 5 residents reviewed for physician supervision and the effectiveness of treatments. Findings include:Resident #2 (R2)Review of a Face Sheet for R2 revealed she originally admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of a Nurse Practitioner Progress note dated [DATE] for R2 revealed: increase lisinopril from 30 mg (milligrams)/d (daily). Will repeat BMP (basic metabolic panel lab) next lab day.Review of a Physician Progress note dated [DATE] for R2 revealed: Lisinopril recently increased from 30mg/d to 40mg/d however not changed in chart. BMP ordered however no results, will re-order.Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for R2 revealed the changed dose of lisinopril 40 mg originally ordered on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 1275500, 1275498, and 1275497. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) implement systematic documentation and accurate reflection of 2 residents (R2, R5 and R6) of 4 residents reviewed for complete and accurate medical records and 2.) ensure wound dressing changes were not falsified for 1 resident (R5) of 4 residents reviewed for treatment administration. Findings include:Resident #2 (R2)Review of a Face Sheet for R2 revealed she originally admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of a Physician Progress note dated 7/1/25 for R2 revealed: Lisinopril recently increased from 30mg/d to 40mg/d however not changed in chart. BMP ordered however no results, will re-order.Review of a Nursing Progress note dated 7/6/25 for R2 revealed: T.O. (telephone order) from [Practitioner] to give a one-time dose of hydralazine 25 mg for elevated BP (blood pressure) now.Review of the July MAR for R2 revealed no hydralazine orders and no documentation indicating it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake 1275499 and 1275500. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow policies and procedures and report allegations of neglect for 1 resident (R8) of 2 residents who complained of not receiving afternoon medications during resident council.Findings Include:Review of an Abuse Prevention Program Policy & Procedure last reviewed 1/2025 revealed: Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and corporal punishment of any type by staff or anyone. Neglect, is defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. REPORTING/RESPONSE: All alleged or suspected violations are to be reported immediately to the Administrator or Director of Nursing, which are responsible to notify required officials, including to the State Survey Agency, Adult Protective Services, Local Public Safety, Licensure Boards, Regional Director of Operations or Regional Clinical Directors (representative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake 1275498, and 1275497. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1) operationalize policies and procedures, to 2) investigate and address allegations of neglect for two residents (R8 and another unknown resident from resident council) who alleged they did not receive afternoon medications, 3) ensure the alleged staff had current abuse/neglect training, and 4) continue to monitor, correct, and prevent further neglect of dressing changes and wound care not being provided, for three residents (R5, R6, and R9) of 4 residents reviewed for wound care after a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) was reported to the State Agency on 5/10/25. Findings include: Review of an Abuse Prevention Program Policy & Procedure last reviewed 1/2025 revealed: Neglect, is defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Neglect/Deprivation of Goods and Services by Staff. Abuse also includes the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-11 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 1275500. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate and provide vision services for 1 resident (Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed for ancillary services.Findings include: Resident #2 (R2)Review of a Face Sheet for R2 revealed she originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In an interview on 7/8/25 at 9:03 AM, Family Member (FM) I reported concerns about R2 needing to see the eye doctor for a few months and as of last month R2 needed new glasses. FM I reported he had talked to the Social Worker (SW) B several times in the past few months about getting R2 an appointment with the in-house optician and had yet to hear anything. On 6/10/25 he came to the facility and R2's glasses were missing, and she was wearing some random pair of black glasses that were not hers. FM I reported the Social Worker did not know where R2 got those glasses. FM I reported he talked to SW B many times about getting an eye doctor appointment that he finally gave up and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-11 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake 1275498, 1275500, and 1275497. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide agency staff training/orientation to the facility prior to starting their shift for 2 of 2 agency nurses reviewed for training and one agency Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 33 residents who reside at the facility.Findings include: In an interview on 7/9/25 at approximately 11:00 AM, Agency CNA L was questioned if a certain resident wore hearing aids. CNA L reported she did not get that information during the shift change report but should be able to find it in the care plan. At this time, she accessed the Electronic Medical Records (EMR) and could not find the resident on the computer. CNA L reported she did not get a training or an orientation to the facility prior to starting and that was her first day. CNA L reported she would provide that information after she found out. Review of two agency nurse employee files revealed Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) F and LPN M did not have any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake 1275498, 1275500, and 1275497.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's) received their annual competencies out of 2 CNAs reviewed for sufficient training and continuing competencies. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 33 residents who reside at the facility.Findings include: Review of the employee files for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) J and CNA K revealed they had not received their in-service training that included their continuing annual competencies. In an interview on 7/11/25 at 10:13 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) reported that one of the duties of the Human Resource (HR) staff was to complete the annual skills checks. The facility did not have an HR staff at the time of this survey.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: During a tour of the kitchen, starting at 9:45 AM on 12/2/24, observation of the two door True cooler found that the left and right doors each had a section of gasket that was ripped and torn. During an interview with Dietary Manager (DM) D, at 10:01 AM on 12/2/24, it was found that he has only been at the facility for a month. When asked if there was any plumbing issues in the kitchen, DM D stated that the faucet and water line leading to the one compartment sink on the dish line leaks when it's in use. When asked if Maintenance is aware of the issue, DM D stated he's been informed, but he's only been here less than a week. During a tour of the lunch service, at 12:10 PM on 12/2/24, it was observed that the plate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in the satisfaction of living, affecting residents in following areas: During an observation on 12/02/24 at 9:21 AM, the following were noted in the living area of bed 14-2: (a) the window blinds had multiple broken slats, (b) the foot board of the bed had fall off and laid on the floor at the end of the bed on top of the machine that controlled the APM (alternating pressure mattress), and (c) at the foot of the bed a strip of molding that secured and protected a cord had been pulled off the wall and laid on the floor. During an observation on 12/02/24 at 9:59 AM, the following was noted in the east hall dining room: (a) a television was on for residents to sit and watch, (b) there was a hoyer lift stored in the room, (c) four wheelchairs were stored in the room, and (d) two vitals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Guardian of changes for one (R30) of one resident reviewed for notification of changes. Findings include: R30 Review of a Face Sheet for R30 revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of fracture, Down syndrome, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R30 revealed on 10/19/24 she weighed 88.8 pounds, 11/5/24 - 83.8 pounds, 11/8/24 - 82.6 pounds, and on 11/12/24 - 81.4 pounds. No other weights were documented to 12/3/24 as of this survey. This indicates an 8.33% weight loss in less than 30 days. Review of the EMR Food Intake for R30 between 11/4/24 and 12/3/24 revealed she received the following: 12 breakfasts, 9 lunches, and 14 dinners. Several days of the month she received no meals at all. No documentation indicating the Guardian was informed. Review of a Dietary Progress Note for R30 dated 11/8/24 revealed: Wt (weight) review: current wt 83.8#, signif wt (significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep comfortable temperatures and a homelike environment for 5 (R10, R3, R13, R29, R4) of 5 residents reviewed for comfortable temperatures and homelike environment. Findings include R10 During an observation and an interview on 12/2/24 at 10:04 AM, R10 was observed in bed bundled up in a blanket and shaking. She said she was shivering because it is cold. The hallway thermostat was not proving a temperature, and the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there was no reading. The Maintenance Director was outside shoveling snow at this time. In an interview on 12/2/24 at 10:25 AM the Maintenance Director (MD) N reported he just started working at the facility. He verified with his thermometer the temperature in room [ROOM NUMBER] was reading between 65.5 degrees F (Fahrenheit) and 68 degrees F. There is a thermostat in the room that is set at 68 degrees. He reported the facility has a boiler system and the hallways have heating/air-conditioning units called…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to account for controlled substances according to professional standards for three of four residents reviewed. (Resident #28, Resident #29, and Resident #32) Findings: Resident #28 (R28) Review of a Face Sheet revealed R28 was a [AGE] year old female, last admitted back to the facility on [DATE] following a three day stay at the hospital, with pertinent diagnoses of Alzheimer's and history of falling. Review of a Physician Order Summary revealed R28 was ordered Hydrocodone-Actetaminophen (Norco- a controlled substance and opioid pain medication) 5-325 milligrams (mg) one tab twice daily. Review of an Electronic Medication Administration Record (Emar) dated February 2025 for R28 showed nursing documentation that the resident received two doses of Norco 5-325 mg on 02/01/25. Review of a Controlled Substance Proof Of Use form for R28 reflected that the resident only received one dose of Norco 5-325 mg on 02/01/25, as evidenced by only one tablet being signed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food at a palatable temperature to 3 of 16 residents and all residents who consume food resulting in the potential for decreased food consumption and potential nutritional decline. During a tour of lunch service, at 12:08 PM on 12/2/24, an interview with Dietary Manager (DM) D found that the plate warmer has not been working that good since he started a month ago. At this time the plates were found to be 88F. DM D stated that he's only been here a month and has had the plate warmer looked at a couple times. When asked if there was a way to turn it up, DM D stated it only has an on and off switch. Outside of thermal covers, the facility does not use any other equipment to ensure hot food to residents. During an interview with DM D at 12:13 PM on 12/2/24, found that he likes to see 180F from hot food on the steam table in order to keep it hot for residents. When asked to see the temperature sheet for today's lunch, in order to check…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide bedtime snacks to four of four residents (Resident #17, Resident #5, Resident #12, and Resident #133) reviewed. Findings: Resident #17 (R17) Review of a Face Sheet revealed R17 was a [AGE] year old male with pertinent diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, weight loss, and weakness. During an interview on 12/02/24 at 11:50 AM, R17 reported that he does not get offered a bedtime snack consistently. Review of a bedtime snack log for R17 reflected from 11/02/24 to 12/02/24, the resident was offered a bedtime snack on four evenings. Resident #5 (R5) Review of a Face Sheet revealed R5 was a [AGE] year old female with a pertinent diagnosis of insulin dependent diabetes. During an interview on 12/04/24 at 9:40 AM, R5 indicated that sometimes she was offered a snack at bedtime. Review of a bedtime snack log for R5 reflected that from 11/04/24 to 12/04/24, the resident was offered a bedtime snack on eight evenings. Review of a Care Plan for R5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach for one resident ( Resident #133) out of four residents reviewed. Findings: Resident #133 (R133) Review of a Face Sheet revealed R133 was an [AGE] year old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of recent amputation of left leg below the knee, diabetes mellitus, and dementia. During an observation on 12/02/24 at 9:21 AM, R133's call light touch pad sat on the over bed table in the upper right hand corner. The over bed table was partially across the bed below R133's waist. When interviewed, R133 stated that the call light touch pad was in that location when he woke up this morning and has been there since. When asked to try and reach and activate the touch pad call light, R133 could not. During an observation on 12/02/24 at 10:04 AM, staff were seen leaving R133's room. The call light remained out of reach of R133 in the upper right hand corner of the over bed table. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow policies and procedures to resolve a grievance for missing items for one (R183) of one resident reviewed for missing items. Findings include: Review of a policy titled Grievances/Concerns last reviewed 1/2024 revealed: Purpose: To support each resident's right to voice grievances and to ensure that a policy is in place to process grievance. Providing prompt actions to resolve grievances/concerns and to keep the resident apprised of progress towards resolution. Please note: Should a grievance/concern be a missing item, please complete the missing item report, track and trend accordingly. In an interview on 12/3/24 at 8:14 AM, R183 reported she has lots of clothes missing and was told by staff that her clothes will come up (appear) but never does. She claims she is missing her winter boots, a pair of pants, some shirts and a gown. R183 reported she told the Administrator who told her needed receipts, but she does not have any receipts because they are things she has already worn. Review of Resident Council Minutes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for one (R30) of one resident reviewed for care plans and interventions. Findings include: R30 Review of a Face Sheet for R30 revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of fracture, Down syndrome, adult failure to thrive, anxiety, depression, dorsalgia (pain in the muscles, nerves, bones, joint or other structures associated with the spinal column) and spondylosis (cervical osteoarthritis). Review of the Care Plan for R30 revealed no focus for anxiety and depression, dorsalgia or spondylosis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R30 revealed she is moderately cognitively impaired. She likes doing things with groups of people. She is dependent on staff for toileting, transfers, bathing, dressing, and mobility. She is incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the Care Plans for R30 revealed there is no activity care plan, no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide foot care for 1 (R13) of two residents reviewed for foot care. Findings include: Review of a Face Sheet for R13 revealed admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. During an observation and an interview on 12/2/24 at 10:18 AM, R13 was in his room sitting up in his wheelchair with no shoes on, toes observed contracted and his toenails are very long. He reported he is supposed to see a podiatrist but has not seen one yet. He did not like his toenails being that long. The big toenails were obviously extended beyond the baseline of his nailbed. In an interview on 12/3/24 at 3:27 PM, Social Worker (SW) H reported R13 is on the list to see podiatry as of yesterday. They had a consent for R13 to see podiatry in May of 2023 and was unsure when he was last seen by podiatry. SW H then clarified R13 was last seen in February…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to safely secure and store an oxygen tank for one (R183) of one resident reviewed for oxygen tank storage. Findings; R183 During an observation and an interview on 12/2/24 at 9:51 AM, R183 was not in her room, and her coat and a bag of belongings sat in a chair. A portable oxygen tank also sat in the chair laying across the arms of the chair. The Director of Nursing (DON) walked by at this time and the placement of the portable oxygen tank was pointed out to her. The DON reported that it should not stored in that manner. Review of an Oxygen Storage policy last reviewed 1/2024 revealed: -[Oxygen] Cylinders must be secured in racks or by chains.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor weights, provide appropriate nutrition, meals and supplements as ordered, and provide assistance with meals for two (R30 and R29) of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: R30 Review of a Face Sheet for R30 revealed she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of fracture, Down syndrome, and adult failure to thrive. Review of an Initial Nutritional Assessment for R30 dated 10/21/24 revealed: Average po (oral) intake is ranging 51-75% of documented meals since admission and noted to require 1:1 assistance with po intake. Score of 4 on mini nutrition screen indicating malnutrition, request fortified foods and mighty shake (220 kcal (kilocalories), 6 grams pro, ea) BID (twice a day). admission weight on 10/19/24 of 88.8 lbs (pounds), . estimated nutritional needs of 1290-1505 kcal (30-35 kcal/kg r/t (related to) malnutrition) and 43-52 grams protein (1-1.2 gm pro/kg). Continue to monitor weights with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and label medications with currently accepted professional standards for 1 of 1 medication carts reviewed. Findings: During an observation on 12/03/24 at 8:00 AM, the medication cart contained 18 loose pills of various shapes and colors. Each of the pills represented a medication that was prescribed by a physician to a resident. The assistant director of nursing (ADON) indicated that the loose pills should not be there. During the same observation a Basaglar insulin kwik pen prescribed to the resident in bed 12-2, did not have a date written on it indicating when the pen was first opened and used. Review of the facility policy Storage and Expiration dating of Medications (5) Once any medication is opened, facility should follow manufacturer guidelines with respect to expiration dates for opened medications Facility staff should record the date opened on the primary medication container when the medication has a shortened expiration date once opened.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to: 1) label medications in the medication cart and the medication room and 2) secure a medication cart when unattended, potentially affecting all facility residents, resulting in the potential for residents to receive another resident's medications, the potential for cross-contamination from the sharing of resident medications, the potential for residents to receive expired/ less effective medications, the potential for expired Tuberculin Protein Derivative being administered, the potential for inaccurate tuberculin test results from possible oxidation and degradation of the solution, and the potential for unauthorized access to the medication cart and misappropriation of resident medications. Findings include: During an observation on [DATE] at 7:55 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) D was preparing medications for a resident. After RN D prepared the medications, she walked down the hallway to the resident's room to administer the medications. However, RN D left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain the seals on the cooler unit and keep it clean; 2. Provide adequate/sufficient cold holding equipment in order to ensure proper thawing, cooling and storage of potentially hazardous and non-potentially hazardous foods; 3. Ensure proper working order of a dish machine; 4. Ensure chemicals are being properly stored; 5. Bulk storage containers are properly labeled; 6. Ensure equipment is maintained and functions in properly. These conditions resulted in an increased risk of contaminated foods and an increased risk of food borne illness that can affect 25 residents who consume food and beverages from the kitchen. 1. During a tour of the kitchen, on 1/8/24 at 10:25 AM, the True 2 door cooler unit (only commercial cooler) was observed to have torn door seals. Food residues and debris were found on the sides, bottom, and shelving of the cooler unit and was not being properly cleaned/maintained. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 4-501.11 Good Repair and Proper Adjustment (A) EQUIPMENT shall be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 1 of 3 Residents (R84) reviewed for notice of Medicare Non-Coverage with advanced notice of the ending of Medicare coverage, resulting in the potential for R84 to have unexpected medical expenses and financial hardship. Findings included: Review of R84's face sheet, no date revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and he had diagnoses that included Dementia, low back pain, visual loss, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and overflow incontinence. He was his own responsible party. Review of R84's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage notification revealed his Skilled Nursing Services would end on 9/26/23. The signature line was blank. There was a handwritten note dated 9/26/23 that indicated a voice mail message was left for someone else (not R84). During an interview with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 1/9/24 at 8:55 AM, the NHA said she was the one responsible for notifying residents of their change in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00140469. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow a resident to return to the facility after being sent to the hospital for psychiatric issues for one resident, Resident #79 (R79), of three reviewed for facility-initiated transfers, resulting in R79 being displaced and denied psychiatric help due to having to be held in the Emergency Department (ED) for 2-3 weeks because he did not have a home to return to. Findings: Resident #79 (R79) Review of an admission Record revealed R79 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: Metabolic encephalopathy-acute, seizures, Bacteremia, Anemia, Borderline personality disorder, Mild intellectual disabilities, Mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology, Depression, Insomnia, Schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, and Antisocial personality disorder. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R79, with a reference date of 9/28/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with dialysis for the medical care of 1 Resident (R9) of 1 Resident reviewed for Dialysis care, resulting in the potential for medical needs to be missed. Findings include: R9 Review of R9's face sheet, no date revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on stage renal disease, Acute kidney failure, congestive heart failure, diabetes type II, morbid obesity and gout. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/10/24 at 11:13 AM, the DON was asked how the facility communicates medical concerns with R9's Dialysis staff. The DON said they complete a communication form on dialysis treatment days and place it in a book that goes to dialysis with R9. The DON said staff are to check R9's book on return form dialysis. If the form is not returned, staff are expected to call dialysis for a report and document the conversation in R9's progress notes. The DON reviewed R9's dialysis book and she was not able locate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a monthly pharmacy medication regimen review was performed and/or the pharmacy recommendation was acted upon in a timely manner after the physician approved the recommendation for 2 of 5 residents reviewed (R9 and R15), resulting in the pharmacy not performing a monthly medication regimen review for R9, the pharmacy recommendation not being implemented after the physician approved it in a timely manner for R15, the potential for the physician not being made aware of potentially serious concerns with a resident's medication regimen, and the potential for serious adverse effects from a delay in implementing a physician approved pharmacy recommendation. Findings include: R15 A review of R15's Face Sheet, dated 1/9/24, revealed R15 was an [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In addition, R15's Face Sheet revealed multiple diagnoses that included repeated falls, stage 3 chronic kidney disease (a disease and stage in which the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide collaborative care for 1 hospice Resident (R24) of 1 Resident reviewed for hospice care, resulting in the potential for unmet needs. Findings included: Review of R24's face sheet no dated revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included: Multiple sclerosis, bipolar disorder, heart failure, chronic pain, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. R24 was her own responsible party. R24 was observed in bed on 1/8/24 at 10:47 AM. R24 said she was in hospice care. R24 was asked what days hospice provides care. R24 said they do not have any specific days. R24 denied ever being asked when she wanted care or being provided a schedule for hospice staff visits. During an interview with R24's hospice Registered Nurse (RN) C at the nurse's station, on 1/10/24 at 9:07 AM, RN C was asked about hospice staff scheduling R24's care. RN C she does not schedule R24's care because she is in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have the required Quarterly Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee meeting that included key personnel (Medical Director, Director of Nursing, and at least one of who must be: Nursing Home Administrator, a board member or other individual in leadership role and the Infection Preventionist) for 1 of the 4 quarters in 2023, resulting in the potential for quality improvement concerns to be missed. Findings included: During the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) review with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 1/19/24 at 2:21 PM the NHA said she started at the facility in August of 2023. The NHA said the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee meets monthly. The NHA reviewed the QAA book, and each month had a tab with a signature page for everyone that attended the meetings for that month. Signature pages for January through May of 2023 did not reveal that all key personnel (Medical Director, Director of Nursing, and at least one of who must be: Nursing Home Administrator, a board member or other individual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATRIUM CENTERS — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.0-2.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
The other 25 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Marshall Nursing and Rehabilitation CommunityMarshall, MI 1 of 5Mulder Health Care FacilityWest Salem, WI 2 of 5Allendale Nursing and Rehabilitation CommunityAllendale, MI 2 of 5Plainwell Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation CommuniPlainwell, MI 2 of 5Roosevelt Park Nursing and Rehabilitation CommunitMuskegon, MI 2 of 5South Haven Nursing and Rehabilitation CommunitySouth Haven, MI 2 of 5The Timbers of Cass CountyDowagiac, MI 2 of 5Tomah Nursing And RehabTomah, WI 2 of 5Westgate Nursing & Rehabilitation CommunityIronwood, MI 3 of 5Austinburg Nsg And Rehab CtrAustinburg, OH 3 of 5Crittenden County Health & Rehabilitation CenterMarion, KY 3 of 5Frederic Nursing And Rehab CommunityFrederic, WI 3 of 5Lincoln Haven Nursing & Rehabilitation CommunityLincoln, MI 3 of 5Prescott Nursing And Rehab CommunityPrescott, WI 3 of 5Salem Springlake Health & Rehabilitation CenterSalem, KY 3 of 5Woodside Village Care CenterMount Gilead, OH 4 of 5Blossom Nursing And Rehab CenterSalem, OH 4 of 5Fairview Nursing and Rehabilitation CommunityCentreville, MI 4 of 5Gladwin Nursing and Rehabilitation CommunityGladwin, MI 4 of 5Grayling Nursing & Rehabilitation CommunityGrayling, MI 4 of 5Heritage Nursing and Rehabilitation CommunityZeeland, MI 4 of 5Lexington Court Care CenterLexington, OH 5 of 5Freeman Nursing & Rehabilitation CommunityKingsford, MI 5 of 5Hillcrest Nursing and Rehabilitation CommunityNorth Muskegon, MI 5 of 5King Nursing & Rehabilitation CommunityHoughton Lake, MI

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ATRIUM CENTERS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/01/2007
BAILEY, ESSELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/01/2007
FINNEY, DONALDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/22/2012
MCDERMOTT, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/13/2019
ATRIUM CENTERS MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2007
ORION OPERATING SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2007
ALBRIGHT ROSS, SUSANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2018
LOCKHART, DENNISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2018
MCGAHAN, LISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/25/2019

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$469K
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 5%Other / private 29%

This home reported $469K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$309per resident / day
operating cost
$9,391per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$312per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235535. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next