Austinburg Nsg And Rehab Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 114 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 39.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 76.7 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-01-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy the facility did not ensure menu spreadsheets were followed to provide appropriate portion sizes to Resident #26, #40, #43, #55 and #57 who the facility identified as receiving pureed diets. In addition, the facility did not ensure all other residents receiving meals from the kitchen received appropriate portions sizes at meals excluding Resident #441 who received a full liquid diet and Resident #64 who the facility identified as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility menu Atrium Living Center Fall/Winter 2024/2025 Menus for week three revealed for dinner on 01/28/25 chicken pot pie, buttered broccoli, pineapple cup, two percent milk and coffee/tea were to be served. Review of the facility week three dinner (01/28/25) spread sheet (expanded menu) revealed for the pureed chicken pot pie no specific scoop size listed, but one #16 (two ounce) scoop was to be used for the pureed broccoli. The spreadsheet did not indicate mashed potato was to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen excluding Resident #64 who the facility identified as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Observation of the kitchen on 01/27/25 from 8:11 A.M. to 8:45 A.M. with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #702 revealed the following concerns: • The large industrial fan located in the corner of the kitchen revealed a build up of dust and debris on the blades and metal guard. • On the inside top of the microwave used for resident fooods was an accumulation of food particles and dried food splatters. • In the walk in cooler on the right hand side of the floor under the crates of milk was a moderate amount of a white dried substance resembling milk that had spilled onto the floor. There was one five pound container of cottage cheese which was unopened…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure meal intakes were recorded for Residents #13, #18, #65, and #66, failed to ensure weights were obtained and recorded into the medical record for residents #13 and #41 and failed to ensure therapeutic diets were implemented as ordered for Residents #65 and #66 to allow for accurate nutritional assessment and monitoring of nutritional status. This affected five residents (#13, #18, #41, #65, and #66) out of five reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/01/24. Diagnoses included non-displaced fracture of greater trochanter of right femur, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, major depressive disorder, type two diabetes, and dysphagia. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/15/25, revealed Resident #66 was severely impaired cognitively, dependent on staff for eating, had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the failed to ensure palatable meals were served to Resident #16, #17, #21, #24, #27, #31, #32, #56 and #73. This affected nine residents (#16, #17, #21, #24, #27, #31, #32, #56 and #73) of 21 residents reviewed for food. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1.Review of facility menu Atrium Living Center Fall/Winter 2024/2025 Menus for week three dinner on 01/28/25 revealed chicken pot pie, buttered broccoli, pineapple cup, two percent milk and coffee/tea was to be served. Observation on 01/28/25 at 4:20 P.M. of Dietary [NAME] (DC) #700 taking the temperature of the tray line items using a facility thermometer revealed all items were at a safe temperature with the chicken pot pie at 206 degrees Fahrenheit (F), the broccoli at 179 degrees F, the pineapple at 42 degrees F and an eight-ounce carton of milk at 38.8 degrees F. Observations throughout the tray line process on 01/28/25 from 4:20 P.M. to 5:24 P.M. revealed the chicken pot pie for the regular diets had a very thin layer of biscuit on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely notification of Resident #74's fall to the resident representative. This affected one resident (#74) of one resident reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #74 revealed an admission date of 09/13/24. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, cognitive communication deficit, and vascular dementia, moderate, with agitation. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #74 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the interdisciplinary team (IDT) progress note dated 01/22/25 at 3:45 P.M. revealed a fall on 01/13/25 was discussed. Resident #74 noted to be confused with agitation and was wandering into other residents' rooms. He was last seen sitting on his bed at 4:00 A.M. As an aide was answering another resident's call light, she heard a male voice coming from a resident room, and upon opening the door…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team was present as required when care plan conferences were conducted for Resident #24 and Resident #75. This affected two residents (Resident #24 and #75) of two residents reviewed for care planing. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis of right lower limb, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, sepsis, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, cognitive communication deficit, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of the facility documents titled Care Conference, dated 10/30/24 and 01/13/25 revealed only Resident #24, Social Services (SS) #823, MDS Registered Nurse (RN)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to give medications with an error rate of under five percent. This affected one resident (Resident #435) of two residents reviewed for medication administration. The total census was 82. Findings include: Record review of Resident #435 revealed he was admitted [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute peptic ulcer with hemorrhage, and hypoxemia. He had active orders dated 01/17/25 for one pill of coenzyme Q10 30 milligrams (mg), one pill of vitamin E 268 mg, and one puff of Trelegy Ellipta (a combination inhalation medication for COPD) 200-62.5-25 micrograms. All of these medications were ordered to be given once daily between 7:00 A.M. and 11:00 A.M. Observation of medication administration for Resident #435 by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #802 on 01/28/25 at 8:25 A.M. revealed she did not have the correct doses of coenzyme Q10 and vitamin E in the medication cart and held the medications. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the physician and/or resident responsible party was notified of change in condition. This affected three residents (#15, #52, and #61) out of seven residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 05/05/20 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, diabetes, dementia, altered mental status, and hypertension. Resident #15's medical record revealed she had a power of attorney (POA) for medical decisions. Review of the care plan dated 05/10/20 revealed Resident #15 was at nutritional risk due to congestive heart failure and confusion. The care plan revealed on 12/16/22 she triggered for weight loss of 7.8 percent in 30-days due to inadequate oral intake. Interventions included diet as ordered, monitor intake, weight every month, and notify physician of a significant change. Review of the quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure accurate and timely weights were obtained for Residents #52 and #171, who were both on feeding tubes. This affected two residents (#52 and #171) of three residents reviewed for weights. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #171 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diseases of intestine, atrial fibrillation, dysphasia, bacterial pneumonia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, iron deficiency anemia secondary to blood loss (chronic), and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Summary (MDS) 3.0 assessment of 12/28/22 revealed Resident #171 was cognitively intact, required extensive assist of two for most activities of daily living (ADL), was totally dependent for eating and received 51 percent (%) or more of his total calories through a feeding tube. Review of Resident #171's care plan of 12 23/22 identified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility did not ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed. This affected two residents (#11 and #61) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 74. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 01/30/21 with diagnoses including dementia, psychotic disturbance, heart failure, hypertension, and acute kidney failure. Review of the pharmacy Consultation Report dated 04/07/22 revealed Pharmacist #901 recommended to consider changing the immediate release formulation of Metoprolol (medication to treat high blood pressure, chest pain, and heart failure) to the extended-release formulation. The pharmacy recommendation was not addressed. Review of the pharmacy Consultation Report dated 08/13/22 revealed Pharmacist #901 recommended discontinuing acetaminophen- hydrocodone (opioid pain medication) as she had not used the medication since 11/14/21. The pharmacy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATRIUM CENTERS — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 54 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH