King Nursing & Rehabilitation Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 61 beds and averages 38.3 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This deficient practice pertains to Facility Reported Incident (FRI) 3014540.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent, detect, and respond to an elopement for one Resident (#30) of four residents reviewed for elopement.Findings include:Resident #30 (R30)Review of the FRI submitted to the State Agency (SA) on 5/3/26 at 8:05 PM, included an investigation report which read, in part: Staff reported [R30] left facility out west hall door. [R30] was assisted willingly back into the building.[R30] wearing sweatpants, grippy socks, and a shirt. Weather at time sunny 55 degrees.[R30].resides on the west hall. He [R30] is independently ambulatory without the need of assistive devices and routinely ambulates around his room and the facility as he desires. On the afternoon of 5.3.26, [R30] exited the west hall exit door and ambulated outside. [R30] was assisted willingly back inside the building, and when asked, he stated he, just wanted to go outside.A new BIMs [brief interview for mental status] assessment was completed following this incident and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor fluids as ordered for one Resident (R6) of two residents reviewed for fluid concerns. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for fluid imbalance. Findings include: Resident #6 (R6) The medical record revealed an admission date of 9/20/21 and a diagnosis list including dementia, stroke, and hyponatremia (a condition where the blood sodium is too low and can trigger cell swelling causing health issues ranging from mild to life threatening.) The medical record included a physician order dated 5/14/24 which read Fluid restriction of 1.5 liters daily secondary to hyponatremia. On 4/8/25 at 12:34 PM during a tour of the dining room, R6 was observed eating lunch. The tray card indicated a diet of Regular, NAS (No Added Salt) 1500 cc (cubic centimeters) Restr (Restriction - indicating a fluid restricted diet of 1.5 liters.) When the resident was asked if she limited her fluids. The resident replied she did not. On 4/10/25 at 8:31 AM, R6 was observed in the dining room eating breakfast. Again, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This deficiency pertains to MI00148756. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of narcotic medication for one Resident (#1) of five residents reviewed for misappropriation. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) Review of R1's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 8/2/24 with diagnoses including malignant cancer of the colon and rectum. Review of R1's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/12/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicative of intact cognition. R1 signed with hospice services on 8/6/24. Review of R1's EMR physician orders revealed the following pharmacy order, initiated 9/11/24: Hydrocodone acetaminophen (opiate [narcotic] medication mixed with Tylenol) - Schedule II tablet; 10-325 mg [milligram]; 1 tab; oral, Four Times A Day. Review of R1's Medication Administration Record [MAR] revealed they were scheduled to receive a dose of hydrocodone at 2:00 AM, 8:00 AM, 2:00 PM, and 8:00 PM. Review of the FRI read, in part: On 11/27/2024 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety potentially resulting in a food borne illness among any or all 42 residents. Findings include: On 5/6/24 at approximately 1:03 p.m., three individual take-out containers lacking resident names or dates were observed in the refrigerator located in the activity room. Upon opening the individual containers, the following was observed: 1) A small Styrofoam cup with lid containing what appeared to be a milk shake with mold growing on top of the substances. 2) Two packages of hot dogs, expired on 4/27/24 and 2/19/24, hot dog buns that expired on 2/19/24 and the first name of a resident. 3) A large Styrofoam take out container containing crab Rangoon with no label or date. A Record of Refrigeration Temperatures log for May 2024 was observed in a drawer to the left of the refrigerator. No temperatures were recorded from 5/1/24 through 5/6/24. On 5/7/24 at approximately 2:00 p.m. the Nursing Home Administrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed in implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for seven Residents (R3, R7, R17, R23, R29, R33, and R36) of twelve sampled residents reviewed for infection control practices. Findings include: Resident #3 (R3) On 5/6/24 at 12:05 PM, an observation was made of R3's sitting in her room. R3 was observed to have an indwelling urinary catheter. R3's room door lacked any indication she was on EBP and lacked a cart for personal protective equipment (PPE) outside of her room. Further observations of the facility's halls and resident rooms revealed the lack of any residents being identified as having EBP or PPE carts. Review of R3's physician order, dated 4/14/24, read in part, Catheter care per shift . Resident #7 (R7) Review of R7's physician order, dated 3/1/24, read in part, Flush peg tube . Resident #17 (R17) Review of R17's physician order, dated 5/3/24, read in part, .Wound: cleanse with wound cleaner. Pat dry. Lightly pack .every day . Resident #23 (R23) Review of R23's physician order, dated 4/1/24, read in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to address range of motion (ROM) for one Resident (R33) of two residents reviewed for limited range of motion. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for extreme pain, discomfort, and worsening of contractures. Findings include: Review of R33's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed an admission date of 10/20/21 and diagnoses including epilepsy, dementia with agitation, seizure disorder, weakness, convulsions, and cognitive communication deficit. Her 3/18/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed she was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score and was marked with severely impaired cognition. Review of MDS Section GG dated 3/18/24, revealed R33 had functional limitations secondary to rand of motion deficits to both sides of her upper and lower extremity. In Section O of her 3/18/24 MDS, she was noted to have received zero days of treatment in a Restorative Nursing Program which included range of motion (passive and active, splint,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by failing to ensure the low temperature sanitizing dish machine was functioning in accordance with the manufacturer's data plate. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among any and all 41 residents of the facility. Findings include: On 6/13/23 at 1:27 PM, observations were made of the kitchen with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) D. The mechanical dish machine was identified as a low temperature sanitizing unit and verified by CDM D as such. [NAME] K was present operating the dish machine, placing soiled dishes, and other food service equipment through the machine. Four cycles were initiated and allowed to run through its entirety while observing the temperature gauge. The temperature gauge, during the wash cycle continually registered less than 120°F, with the maximum temperature observed on the machine's thermometer being 114°F. This temperature was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATRIUM CENTERS — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 43 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $663K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI