Prescott Nursing And Rehab Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 38.1 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents who were fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed. (R33) R33 was not given enteral feeding nutrition as ordered; instead R33 received twice as much as ordered resulting in vomiting and aspiration, requiring suctioning and transfer to hospital on [DATE] where R33 expired on [DATE]. The facility's failure to properly monitor, assess, and correctly follow physician (MD) orders and treatments for enteral feeding resulted in resident receiving twice as much enteral feeding as ordered and created a finding of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on [DATE]. The state agency notified Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 3:00 PM. The immediate jeopardy was removed on [DATE], however the deficient practice continues at a level D (potential for harm/isolated) as the facility continues to implement its action plan. This is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 of 5 residents (R) reviewed were free from chemical restraints. (R21)R21 was prescribed a hypnotic medication. There is no indication nonpharmacological interventions were tried prior to initiating the medication. The facility did not complete a sleep assessment, care plan, or monitor R21's sleep. R21 denied insomnia or history of sleep concerns. R21 is not informed that R21 is taking a psychotropic for sleep.Findings:R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses including bipolar disorder, obstructive sleep apnea (adult) (pediatric), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, asthma, manic episode, unspecified mood (affective) disorder, and anxiety disorder.R21's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/1/26, indicated R21 is dependent for assistance for all transfers and assistance with position changing. R21 can perform most activities of daily living with assistance of setting up the task. R21's Brief Interview of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the residents remain free of possible accidental hazards. Facility did not determine the correct mechanical full body lift (Hoyer) sling size and ensure staff were applying the correct size Hoyer sling to prevent accidents for 3 of 7 residents (R) reviewed. (R7, R37, R44). Facility developed a plan of care for R37 that listed the use of an xl (x-[NAME] large) Hoyer sling when a large sling should be used per manufacturer's guidelines. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) used a medium Hoyer sling to transfer R37. Facility developed a plan of care for R44 that listed use of an xl sling when a large Hoyer sling should be used per manufacturer's guidelines. CNAs used a medium Hoyer sling to transfer R44. Facility developed a plan of care for R7 that listed use of an xl sling when a large Hoyer sling should be used per manufacturer's guidelines.Findings include:The Direct Supply Slings manufacturer's guidelines, no date, states, With…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 1 resident (R) receiving nutrition through tube feedings (enteral nutrition) (R26).The facility did not ensure standards of practice were conducted by ensuring proper gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement before administering medications via G-tube.The facility policy titled, Care and Treatment of Feeding Tubes, last reviewed 04/03/25 states under the section of Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines, .6.licensed nurses, will monitor and check that the feeding tube is in the right location (a). Tube placement will be verified before beginning a feeding and before administering medications.On 05/12/26, Surveyor reviewed R26's medical record. R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of placement of a gastrostomy tube following surgery for right hemicolectomy.R26's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not provide a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 14 residents. (R4 and R7)-Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E did not place barrier between floor and graduate when emptying R4's Foley catheter bag.-CNA D did not sanitize the mechanical lift after transferring R6, nor prior to using mechanical lift to transfer R7. CNA D and CNA E used the EZ stand lift for R4's transfer from bed to wheelchair and did not sanitize after use. The facility policy titled, Cleaning/Disinfecting Resident-Care items and Equipment, reviewed on 01/20225 states, . Reusable items are cleaned and disinfected between residents . The facility procedure titled, Emptying a Urinary Drainage Bag Competency, states, . 4. Place a paper towel on floor next to the drainage bag. 5. Place graduate collection container on top of paper towel. Wisconsin Nursing Assistant Curriculum, Copyright © 2023 by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not prepare, store or distribute foods in a sanitary manner. The facility practices had the potential to affect all 29 residents. Kitchen staff did not complete monitoring of sanitation chemicals used to clean kitchen surfaces. Food items stored in the resident refrigerator on the unit were beyond use by dates. This is evidenced by: Facility policy titled, Sanitation Terminology, with a revised date of 01/25, states in part: Quaternary Solutions: a)Use of quat for food contact surfaces bucket: Add quat to water and test concentration in the water by using test strip. It should read 150-400 PPM on the chart. Facility dietary guideline posted on resident refrigerator titled, Unit Fridge, with no date, states in part: Sandwiches made from dietary expires 3 days after preparation. Example 1 On 04/01/25 at 7:44 AM, Surveyor observed red sanitation bucket with a rag inside. No log sheets were observed in kitchen area to document the level of chemicals used in the sanitation bucket. On 04/01/25, Surveyor reviewed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This had the potential to affect all 29 residents (R). -The facility did not have an infection surveillance process in place for a GI outbreak in March 2025. -Staff did not follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) of wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing IV medication administration for R236, when providing catheter care and positioning for R22, and when providing resident cares for R11. Findings include: Example 1 Surveyor reviewed Infection Control (IC) surveillance logs and found the facility identified the facility had an outbreak of Gastrointestinal virus labeled the Norovirus in March 2025, which affected 14 residents and 11 staff members. Surveyor reviewed surveillance logs for March and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-07 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did ensure notification in writing to the resident or resident representative, and the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of residents' transfer or discharge from facility per regulation requirements. The facility practice affected 5 out of 5 residents (R) reviewed for the Office of the State Long-Term Ombudsman notice (R11, R1, R33, R22, R2), and 4 of 5 residents reviewed for transfer notice (R11, R1, R33, R22). Findings include: Facility policy titled, Resident Transfers and Discharge Notification, with a revised date of 04/20/20, states in part: Notice of Transfer or Discharge and Ombudsman Notification: For facility-initiated transfer or discharge of a resident, the facility must notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand .The facility must send a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge to the representative of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility did not notify provider as indicated for blood sugars outside of desired parameters for 1 of 12 residents, (R) R7, reviewed. This is evidenced by: Facility policy titled, Notification of Change, with a reviewed date of 01/2025 states in part: The resident's physician and responsible party must be notified when an event involving the resident occurs or when the resident experiences a change in condition, potential discharge, room transfer or death .Some physicians may require different notification parameters for conditions such as blood glucose or other conditions. Please follow the physician's order in these cases. R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a pertinent diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 2. R7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] noted medication administration of insulin injections and receives hemodialysis. R7's orders: 02/25/25: Insulin lispro 100 unit/ml give per sliding scale three times daily. Per sliding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide written notice of bed-hold policy to the resident or their representative for 1 of 5 residents (R) reviewed for hospitalization. (R22) This is evidenced by: Facility's policy titled Bed Hold with the reviewed date of 01/25, documented in part, 1. The facility Social Worker or designee will provide a copy of the bed hold policy to the resident and/or the resident representative at the time of admission and again prior to a transfer due to hospitalization or therapeutic leave. The signed copies will be maintained in the resident's financial or personal file .3. In the event of an emergency transfer to a hospital, the facility social worker or designee will attempt to contact the resident or resident representative within 24 hours of the transfer and determine whether to hold the resident's bed. Documentation of the bed hold decision will be completed in the resident's medical record. The facility will document multiple attempts if necessary to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0660 — isolated
  Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not implement an effective discharge plan with a focus on identifying resident's need and an effective transition to post discharge care for 1 of 1 resident (R) who were ordered for discharge from the facility, R26. Findings include: Facility policy titled, Discharge/Transition Discharge Planning Process, dated reviewed on 01/2025 states in part, .Standard: All residents will have a discharge plan that supports a smooth transition to home or to the next care setting. The foundation of the plan will be developed for most residents at the time of admission. Procedure: 1. Social Services will facilitate the formulation of the discharge/transitional plan with resident, family, and interdisciplinary team. 2. Social Services will interview the resident and family after admission to determine their discharge and wellness goals. Form 3.6.A 3. The Social worker will develop the resident's initial discharge planning care plan to include the goals and plans. The care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$30,654 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $30,654 — penalty dated 2025-04-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATRIUM CENTERS — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $545K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI