Frederic Nursing And Rehab Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 52.8 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.14 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-05-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff was provided to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This has the potential to affect all 54 residents residing at the facility.The facility's Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) triggered for excessively low weekend staffing for Quarter 3 2025 and Quarter 1 2026.Resident Council interviews voiced concerns with short staffing on weekends and longer call light wait times.Staff interviews voiced insufficient staffing levels to meet resident needs.Findings include:Example 1On Sunday, 05/17/26, Surveyors entered facility shortly after 9 AM. Census posting noted 54 residents, 2 licensed nurses, and 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA). Surveyors observed posted staff to be present.Surveyor reviewed the facility's census for Quarter 3 2025 (April 1-June 30) and Quarter 1 2026 (October 1 - December 31). Facility's average daily census is greater than 51. Working schedules noted a licensed nurse on each shift to be consistent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-19 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the facility wide assessment developed by the facility included all relevant details to ensure the facility provided care and services to residents to meet their individual needs within the facility's identified resources. This has the potential to affect all 54 residents.The Facility Assessment did not indicate how resident needs are assessed to determine sufficient staffing levels.Findings include:Facility Assessment Tool, with a reviewed date of 03/09/26, states: .Average daily census: 50-53.Assistance with Activities of Daily Living include an assist of 1-2 for up to 85% of residents and dependent assist up to 15% of residents.Direct care staff needs of 5-6 CNAs on day shift; 4-5 CNAs on evening shift; 2-3 CNAs on overnight shift.The department directors along with the medical records/staffing clerk for nursing develop a block schedule.On 05/19/26 at 10:16 AM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON) B regarding assessing staffing needs. DON B stated staffing is determined using a patient per day (PPD)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure that each resident has a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including, but not limited to, receiving treatment and support for daily living for 5 (R38, R25, R41, R47, R48) of 6 resident rooms observed and in the hallway on Evergreen unit. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed facility policy titled, Cleaning and Disinfecting Resident Rooms, dated last revised 01/25, states: .Purpose: To provide guidelines for cleaning and disinfection resident's room. Procedure: 1. Housekeeping surfaces (e.g. floors, tabletops) will be cleaned on a regular basis when spills occur, and when these surfaces are visibly soiled. 2. Environmental surface will be disinfected (cleaned) on a regular basis (e.g. daily, three times a week) when surfaces are visibly soiled. 4. Wall, blinds, and window curtains in resident areas will be cleaned when these surfaces are visibly contaminated or soiled. Surveyor reviewed facility Housekeeping task form titled, Housekeeping Areas of Responsibility, which states: .Housekeeper 2 performs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility did not make a prompt effort to resolve resident grievances for 4 of 4 residents (R13, R24, R54, and R59).In March 2026, R13 and R24 filed a grievance to report missing clothing. The facility did not complete an investigation, resolve or follow-up on grievance.In April 2026, R54 and R59 filed a grievance to report missing clothing. The facility did not complete an investigation, resolve or follow-up on grievance.Findings include: Facility policy titled, Grievances/Concerns, with a reviewed date of 01/2025, states: Purpose: Providing prompt actions to resolve grievances/concerns and to keep the resident apprised of progress towards resolution.On 05/18/26 at 2:20 PM, Surveyor completed Resident Council interview with residents. R13 and R24 were present and reported that a grievance had been filed with the facility involving missing clothing and R13 and R24 did not receive any follow-up on it. Surveyor asked residents if missing items can't be found, does the facility offer reimbursement or another resolution. R13 and R24 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-19 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper discharge documentation was completed for 4 of 15 residents (R) (R56, R54 R8, R9) reviewed for discharge and transfer from the facility.R56, R54 and R9 were missing documentation of notification of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman.R8 was missing Bedhold and Transfer notice and the Ombudsman was not notified of the transfer. Findings: The facility policy titled, RESIDENT TRANSFERS AND DISCHARGE Notification reviewed 01/2025 stated in part:The facility will provide written notice in a language the resident or the resident's representative can understand. The notice must also be provided to an immediate family member or legal representative.The facility will utilize and complete all appropriate State forms that include the reason for the discharge, the date of the proposed discharge, the location to which the person will be discharged and their right to appeal the discharge by requesting hearing.The facility will provide the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility did not promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice for 1 of 18 sampled residents (R12). R12 reported his dissatisfaction with the facility not allowing R12 to have his self-purchased coffee maker in R12's room. Findings include: On 05/17/2026 at 10:31 AM, Surveyor interviewed R12 who indicated R12 could not have a coffee maker in his room. R12 reported to Surveyor, R12 had bought his own coffee maker and facility told R12 that R12 could not have R12's coffee maker in the facility. Facility had R12 take coffee maker and place back in the original box and placed in R12's cupboard on top of shelf. R12 stated to Surveyor, I just want my own coffee as the facility coffee sucks. On 05/17/26 at 10:33 AM, Surveyor observed R12 had a coffee maker in an opened box on top shelf in R12's closet in room. On 05/18/26 at 1:13 PM, Surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) H and asked if R12 ever had a coffee maker in his room or requested a coffee maker. CNA H reported to Surveyor that R12 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not immediately report to the physician on call of R3's rib pain post fall for 1 of 4 residents (R) reviewed for falls (R3). R3 fell on [DATE] and had multiple complaints of rib pain on 03/23/26, 03/25/26, and 03/26/26. Facility did not notify the physician on call until 03/26/26. Findings include: R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side, anterior dislocation of left humerus, urinary tract infections, pain in left shoulder, unsteadiness on feet, and hypertensive with congestive heart failure. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/15/26, identified R3's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored 1/15, indicating R3 has moderate cognitive impairment. Surveyor reviewed R3's medical record and found R3 sustained a fall on 03/19/26. Surveyor reviewed R3's progress notes relating to R3's fall on 03/19/26: -On 03/19/26 at 1:53 PM, Writer heard resident [R3] yelling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect resident's right to be free from physical and verbal abuse by a resident for 2 of 2 residents (R40 and R57.) R40 was not protected from physical abuse when R57 struck R40 on the face and head multiple times.R57 was not protected from verbal and mental abuse when R40 yelled, threatened, and threw items at R57.Findings include:Surveyor reviewed the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Program dated last revised 01/26 which states: .Intent: Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and corporal punishment of any type by staff or anyone. The facility will provide a safe resident environment and protect residents from abuse.Definitions: Resident to Resident Abuse: A resident-to-resident altercation should be reviewed as potential situation of abuse. The facility Administrator and Director of Nursing will initiate an investigation of a potential allegation of abuse between residents. Investigations for potential…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility must ensure each resident is free from unnecessary medications as evidenced by completing adequate behavior monitoring for 2 of 5 residents (R28, R1) reviewed for unnecessary medication reviews.R28 receives 4 psychotropic medications including, Aripiprazole tablet; 10 mg; amt: 10mg; oral Special Instructions: bipolar 1 disorder Once a Morning 08:00 AM 3/31/26, Clonazepam - Schedule IV tablet; 0.5 mg; amt: 0.25mg; oral Special Instructions: GAD (general anxiety disorder) At Bedtime 08:00 PM 3/31/26, Fluoxetine capsule; 40 mg; amt: 2 capsules; oral Special Instructions: GAD/OCD (obsessive compulsive disorder) Once A Morning 08:00 AM 3/31/26, and Mirtazapine tablet; 45 mg; amt: 1 tab; oral Special Instructions: GAD/OCD At Bedtime 08:00 PM 3/31/26 without behavior and effectiveness monitoring. R1 receives Duloxetine (antidepressant) capsule, delayed release; 30 milligrams (mg), once every morning without behavior and effectiveness monitoring. Findings include: The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act when an allegation of abuse was not reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials for 1 of 2 resident reviewed for abuse. (Resident (R) 40 and R57). -On 05/16/26, R57 struck R40 along the side of head and top of head from behind multiple times. Facility did not report the physical abuse to state officials. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, dated last revised 01/26, states: .Intent: Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and corporal punishment of any type by staff or anyone. The facility will provide a safe resident environment and protect residents from abuse.Definitions: Resident to Resident Abuse: A resident-to-resident altercation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATRIUM CENTERS — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $910K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI