Woodside Village Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 64.1 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #102. This affected one (Resident #12) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 05/23/25. Diagnoses included dementia, encephalopathy, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and end stage renal disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/13/25, revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident required assistance for mobility, transfers, bathing and feeding. Review of the nursing progress notes dated from 03/01/25 to 06/02/25 revealed Resident #12 had increased agitation and observed behaviors of hitting and kicking facility staff members when they were performing care. Review of the plan of care dated 06/02/25 revealed she was receiving antipsychotic medication to control her behavioral disturbances and sundowning. Review of the facility's investigation file, completed by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report the results of an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (Resident #12) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident 12 revealed an admission date of 05/23/25. Diagnoses included dementia, encephalopathy, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and end stage renal disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/13/25, revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident required supervision for bed mobility, transfers, ambulation. Review of behavior and mood. Review of the nursing progress notes dated from 03/01/25 to 06/02/25 revealed Resident #12 had increased agitation and observed behaviors of hitting and kicking facility staff members when they were performing care. Review of the facility's investigation file, completed by the Director of Nursing (DON) dated 05/27/25 and timed 11:00 A.M. revealed on 05/27/25, CNA #102 was assisting Resident #12 during breakfast.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a staff member was removed from resident care while an allegation of abuse was being investigated. This affected one (Resident #12) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 05/23/25. Diagnoses included dementia, encephalopathy, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and end stage renal disease. Review of the facility's investigation file, completed by the DON dated 05/27/25 and timed 11:00 a.m. revealed on 05/27/25 CNA #102 was assisting Resident #12 during breakfast. Resident #12 was swinging her arms and attempting to kick CNA #102. CNA #102 held down Resident #12 arms to restrain Resident #12 from punching CNA #102. Resident #12 then leaned her head down toward CAN #102's right arm and attempted to bite CNA #102. CNA #102 took her open left hand and struck Resident #12 in the face, intending to thrust Resident #12's head back so she did not bite CNA #102. Review of the time punch card…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were maintained for residents, team members, and visitors in the facility's water pathogen risk reductions. This had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Record review on 01/29/25 and 01/30/25 between 7:30 A.M. and 4:15 P.M. revealed the facility was unable to provide the water management team members and logs of the facility's continual assessment, mitigation, and monitoring of the facility's water system. Observation and tour of the facility on 01/29/25 and 01/30/25 between 7:30 A.M. and 4:15 P.M. revealed the facility's representative had not tested or provided the ability to test or assess the water system for controls such as chlorine. Review of the facility policy titled Water Pathogen Risk Reduction, originally dated 01/2016 and updated on 01/01/25, stated the facility will assign a water management team which included facility leadership…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was kept in a clean and sanitary condition. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except for Resident #52 who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Observation on 01/27/25 at 08:39 A.M. of the kitchen revealed there is a large hole-like area on the wall behind the steamer. Interview on 01/27/25 at 08:41 A.M. with Dietary Supervisor #41 confirmed the large hole-like area on the wall behind the steamer. Observation on 01/28/25 at 11:16 A.M. revealed there is a large hole like area on the wall behind the steamer. Interview on 01/28/25 at 11:16 A.M. with Dietary [NAME] #59 confirmed the large like hole area on the wall behind the steamer. Interview on 01/28/25 at 11:17 A.M. with Local Health Department Inspector #90 revealed she had cited the hole in the wall on the last three health inspection reports. Review of the County Health Department Food Inspection Report, dated 01/28/25 revealed there is damage to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide and document all the required information at the time a beneficiary notice was given. This affected three residents (#11, #21, and #320) of three reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 04/07/22. Diagnoses included myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hyperlipidemia, type II diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, chronic respiratory disease, atrial fibrillation, osteoarthritis, gout, major depressive disorder, atherosclerotic heart disease, anxiety disorder, lymphedema, congestive heart failure, and anemia. Review of Resident #11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/26/24, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #11's intent to discharge from rehabilitation, dated 08/29/24, revealed Resident #11 was receiving physical and occupational therapy and had reached the highest potential and was beginning to plateau.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, observation, and policy review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were updated. This affected two residents (#11 and #29) of two reviewed for falls. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 04/07/22 with diagnoses including but not limited to type two diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 was cognitively intact. Resident #11 was independent for transfers. Review of care plan dated 04/08/22 revealed the following interventions regarding falls: physical educated to hang coat on the hook at the end of the bed (03/28/23), obtain orthostatic blood pressures every shift ordered 01/10/23, and orthostatic blood pressure monitoring for three days (09/09/22). Review of vitals in Matrix revealed no orthostatic blood pressure monitoring. Observation on 01/30/25 at 8:43…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have physician orders for a treatment that was being performed and did not clarify treatment orders for existing pressure injuries. This affected one resident (#7) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included sepsis, type II diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obstructive and reflux uropathy, dysphagia, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, urinary tract infection, tachycardia, contracture of right hand and elbow, elbow, acute cystitis without hematuria, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, hypothyroidism, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, hypertension, edema, other malaise, retention of urine, mood disorder, primary optic atrophy, acute embolism and thrombosis, insomnia, osteoporosis, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and observation the facility failed to ensure the resident had an understanding of pleasure foods. This affected one (Resident #03) of one reviewed for diet. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #03 revealed an admission date of 11/03/10 with diagnoses including but not limited to Parkinson's disease, abnormal posture, cognitive communication deficit, altered mental status, pneumonia, adult failure to thrive, history of personality disorder, anxiety, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #03 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #03 required setup or clean-up assistance for eating. Review of current physician orders revealed Resident #03 was on puree diet, with a sugar substitute, no added salt, nectar thick liquids, and required the use of a cup with a lid, required a two handled cup for hot liquids and food in bowls.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide proper parameters for as needed pain medication orders and did not document pain levels for all uses of as needed pain medication. This affected one (Resident #39) of one residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included pneumonia, hypotension, hypoxemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute and chronic respiratory failure, tremor, cerebral infarction, transient cerebral ischemic attack, dysphagia, hypertension, pure hypercholesterolemia, glaucoma, diplopia, low back pain, and gastrostomy status. Review of Resident #39's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/30/24, revealed the resident had a mild cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #39's current physician orders revealed an order for acetaminophen 325 milligrams (mg),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATRIUM CENTERS — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH