Blossom Nursing And Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 124 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 25.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 87.9 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-12-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to implement an individualized and effective pressure ulcer prevention program to prevent the in house development and/or worsening of pressure ulcers to Resident #11's bilateral heels. Actual harm occurred on 09/22/22 when Resident #11, who was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance from two staff for bed mobility and was at risk for developing pressure ulcers was identified to have a blister to the left heel without evidence of adequate care/interventions to promote healing. On 09/30/22 Resident #11 was assessed to have a blister measuring 5.0 centimeters (cm) in length by 6.0 cm width with no depth to her right heel with no evidence adequate care/interventions to promote heating. On 10/13/22 the wound physician noted the left heel pressure ulcer had deteriorated and was a deep tissue injury (DTI), a persistent non-blanchable deep red, purple, or maroon areas of intact skin, non-intact skin or blood-filled blisters…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of the facility investigation, interview with staff and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from significant medication errors. This affected one resident (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 86. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hydronephrosis, urinary tract infection, acute kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, acute metabolic acidosis, diabetes, cerebral ischemia, obstructive sleep apnea, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Resident #1 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had intact cognition. Review of the progress note dated 03/31/26 at 10:05 P.M. which was recorded as a Late Entry on 04/01/26 at 6:26 A.M., revealed Resident #1 was given…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) was resubmitted after a new psychiatric diagnosis. This affected one (Resident #9) of one residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 91. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/08/23 with admission diagnosis that included mood disorder. Further review of the medical record revealed that on 04/05/23 a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder was added and on 12/13/23 a new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder was also added. Review of Resident #9's PASARR revealed it was completed on 02/13/23 and identified the diagnosis of mood disorder. No further evidence of any resubmission of PASARR was found after the new psychiatric diagnoses on 04/05/23 and 12/13/23. Interview with Social Services (SS) #117 on 12/09/25 at 11:55 A.M. verified the PASARR was not resubmitted for Resident #9 after new psychiatric diagnoses added on 04/05/23 and 12/13/23.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure indwelling urinary catheter care was documented and assessed appropriately. This affected one (Resident #78) of two residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter use. The facility identified eight residents (#2, #3, #6, #7, #56, #67, #78 and #100) currently utilizing an indwelling urinary catheter. The facility census was 91.Observation of Resident #78 on 12/08/25 at 10:08 A.M. identified the current use of an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of Resident #78's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/30/25 with admission diagnoses that included urinary retention, osteonecrosis of the right knee and convulsions. Further review of the medical record revealed upon admission a physician's order for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter and catheter care to be provided every shift. Further review of the medical record found no evidence of any assessment which identified the current use and indication for the indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the treatment administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate infection control practices using required proper hand hygiene for Resident # 6 with use of gloves during incontinence care for Residents #6. This affected one ( Resident #6) and had the potential to affect all 91 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, unspecified, Diverticulosis of intestine, part unspecified, without perforation or abscess without bleeding, Urinary tract infection, site not specified, Retention of urine, unspecified, Generalized anxiety disorder, Hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, or unspecified chronic kidney disease, Diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care planned fall prevention interventions were in place to prevent falls. This affected one resident (Resident #8) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, dementia, difficulty walking, history of falls, and cerebral infarction. The resident was discharged on 03/16/24. Review of the plan of care, dated 09/19/23, revealed Resident #8 was at risk for falls with interventions including toileting offer every two hours, staff to check footwear when delivering tray prior to meal, apply proper non-skid footwear if found to have none on prior meal, educate on the use of the call light for assistance, and call light to be kept within reach. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/10/24,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-06 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of resident accounts and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate accounting of resident funds were maintained. This affected one (Resident #93) of three residents reviewed for resident funds. The facility identified a total of 58 residents, both current and discharged , who had funds maintained by the facility. Findings include: Review of Resident #93's quarterly fund statement for the first quarter of 2023 revealed social security funds were credited to the account on 01/01/23 and twice on 03/01/23. No pension funds were documented as deposited in January 2023. Pension funds were deposited in February and March of 2023. A liability payment of $1102.00 was withdrawn from Resident #93's account on 01/01/23. No liability was withdrawn in February or March 2023. During review of resident personal funds accounts with Business Office Manager (BOM) #100 on 09/06/23 between 1:45 P.M. and 2:02 P.M., BOM #100 revealed Resident #93 had a patient liability amount of $1169.00 starting 01/01/23. BOM #100 verified no pension deposit was posted in January 2023 and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-06 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident funds account review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure conveyance of resident funds within 30 days of discharge or death. This affected three (Residents #93, #94, and #95) of three residents reviewed for personal funds. The census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #94's closed medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, depression, epilepsy and type two diabetes mellitus. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #94 was usually able to understand others. Resident #94 was assessed as moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #94 discharged to another facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #94's personal funds consent dated [DATE] revealed Resident #94 authorized the facility to manage his personal money while he was a resident. Upon discharge, the account would be closed and the funds would be returned to Resident #94. The facility was to furnish a final statement no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-12-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed ensure oxygen tubing/nasal cannulas and aerosol equipment (tubing/mouthpieces) for respiratory treatments were changed and dated weekly and properly stored to prevent infection/contamination when not in use for Residents #8, #36, #37 and #49. This affected four of 13 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy/breathing treatments. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic pulmonary (lung) disease, chronic respiratory failure, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, anxiety, obstructive sleep apnea, atherosclerotic heart disease, affective mood disorder, and insomnia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 was alert,oriented with intact cognition, required extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use and one staff member for dressing and personal hygiene.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-12-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility filed to ensure Resident #36 received showers per her preference. This affected one resident (#36) of three reviewed for choices. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, anxiety, obstructive sleep apnea, atherosclerotic heart disease, muscle weakness, hypothyroidism, affective mood disorder, and insomnia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 had intact cognition, required extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use and one staff member for dressing and personals hygiene. Review of the current facility shower schedule revealed Resident #36 was to have a shower on afternoon shift on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. Review of progress notes from 09/23/22 to 12/04/22 revealed no evidence…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-12-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure resident's confidential information was not left visible on unattended computer screens. This affected three residents (Resident #51, #67 #74) of six observed for medication administration. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes, major depressive disorder, COVID-19, dysphagia, port-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, gout, and osteoarthritis. Observation on 12/05/22 at 11:07 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #815 assembled her equipment and went into the room of Resident #51 to perform blood glucose testing. LPN #815 left Resident #51's medical information on the computer screen. LPN #815 verified at 11:19 A.M. she had not closed out the resident information on her computer screen when she went into the resident's room. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATRIUM CENTERS — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 44 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH