Freeman Nursing & Rehabilitation Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 39 beds and averages 35.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.95 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.08 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to recognize a change in condition for one Resident (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. This deficient practice resulted in rehospitalization, insertion of an indwelling catheter, and intravenous diuretic therapy.(All times are recorded in Eastern Standard Time unless otherwise indicated.)Findings include:Resident #2 (R2)On 12/9/25 at 12:53 PM, an interview was conducted with R2 in their room while sitting in their recliner. R2 was asked if they had a recent hospitalization and replied, Yes, I needed diuretics because of having too much fluid on me. They even put a catheter in me because I was peeing so much. The food here is so salty. I asked not to have salt added to my tray and I will not eat gravy on my food because there is a lot of salt in gravy. I weigh myself every day at home and make sure I am not gaining too much weight because of my heart. R2's local hospital admission, dated 11/20/25, revealed in part, R2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  All times are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise noted.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during delivery of food which has the potential to result in the spread of illness and cross contamination among any or all 34 residents in the facility who receive meals.Findings include:During an observation on 12/10/25 at 9:06 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A retrieved a tray from the food cart and delivered the tray of food to a resident in the dining room. CNA A then walked to the food cart and delivered another tray of food to a resident. CNA A continued to deliver two more trays of food to residents in the dining room and failed to use Alcohol Based Hand Rub (ABHR) [hand sanitizer] or wash her hands between meal tray delivery in the dining room.During an observation on 12/11/25 at 1:06 p.m., CNA A delivered a tray of food to a resident in the dining room and then used the resident's silverware to but up the baked potato. CNA A walked to the food cart and obtained another tray of food to a resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were reviewed in a timely manner for one Resident (#4) and failed to ensure the documentation of advance directives upon admission for one Resident (#33) of 16 residents reviewed. Findings include:All times recorded in Easter Savings Time (EST), unless otherwise noted. Resident #4 (R4) Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) on 12/9/2025 at 2:30 p.m., revealed R4 was designated as DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). Review of the Medical Treatment Decisions of Resident, signed and dated by R4 on 8/15/2024 revealed the following: I have been informed in writing, in language that I understand, of my rights and all rules and regulations to make decisions concerning medical care, include the right to accept or refuse treatment and the right to formulate and to issue Advanced Directives to be followed if i become incapacitated. In the absence of an advance directive, I understand that any and all life sustaining measures may be used. I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of dignified and respectful care and treatment for four Residents (R15, R24, R131, and R17) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for resident rights. This deficient practice resulted in resident dissatisfaction, frustration, and fear of mistreatment. Findings include: All times are in Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise noted. Resident R15 Review of R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/18/24, revealed R15 scored 14 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflective of intact cognition. R15 had clear speech, understood others, and was able to make their needs known. During an interview on 10/22/24 at 7:45 a.m., R15 said she had been told by CNA A that she was not a priority for [them] to provide care for. CNA B also present in the room providing care for R15 was asked if they had ever heard CNA A tell R15 that she was not a priority for [them] to care for. CNA B confirmed R15 had told her CNA A told her (R15) that she was not a priority to [them]. CNA B said CNA A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This deficiency pertains to Intake MI00143784. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency for one Resident (R15) of three residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for continuation of potential abuse for vulnerable facility residents. Findings include: All times are in Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise noted. Review of R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/18/24, revealed R15 scored 14 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflective of intact cognition. R15 had clear speech, understood others, and was able to make her needs known. During an interview on 10/21/24 at 3:15 p.m., Resident #15 (R15) was asked if there were any concerns with physical or verbal abuse, or disrespectful care in the provision of care and services by staff. R15 stated, I told [Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B] first that they were poking their gloved finger in my [vaginal area] . and it hurt . There are a lot of older women in here that are not on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This deficiency pertains to Intake MI00143784. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely and fully investigate an allegation of abuse for one Resident (R15) of three residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for continuation of potential abuse for vulnerable facility residents. Findings include: All times are in Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise noted. Review of R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/18/24, revealed R15 scored 14 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflective of intact cognition. R15 had clear speech, understood others, and was able to make her needs known. During an interview on 10/21/24 at 3:15 p.m., Resident #15 (R15) was asked if there were any concerns with physical or verbal abuse, or disrespectful care in the provision of care and services by staff. R15 stated, I told [Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B] first that they were poking their gloved finger in my [vaginal area] . and it hurt . There are a lot of older women in here that are not on the ball, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately conduct a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for an antidepressant medication for one Resident (R19) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for adverse medication side effects. Findings include: All times are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise noted Resident #19 (R19) Review of R19's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 7/8/22 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, depression, and adult failure to thrive. Review of her 10/18/24 Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score on her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed an 8/15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of the Consultation Report from [Pharmacy Name} for 9/13/24 read, in part, (R19) has received Lexapro (antidepressant medication) 10 mg (milligrams) daily since Sept (September) 2022. Her last PHQ-9 score from July was 0 indicating no signs/symptoms of depression. According to the (name of Company) progress note from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0847 — isolated
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident/residents durable power of attorney (DPOA) understood the purpose of binding arbitration agreements (an out of court alternate form of dispute resolution) for one Resident #19 (R19) of three residents reviewed for arbitration. Findings include: Resident #19 (R19) A review of R19's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed admission to the facility on 7/8/22, with active diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, depression, and hypertension. R19 scored 6 of 15 on the Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment reflective of severe cognitive impairment. Review of facility arbitration document titled Freeman Resolving Potential Disputes, revealed R19 signed the agreement on 12/29/22. Review of facility document titled Decision Making Capacity Determination, read in part . This form serves as documentation of the determination of [R19's] capacity to participate in medical treatment and decision following examination…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure disinfection of environmental surfaces, appropriate hand hygiene and donning and doffing of gloves to prevent the spread of infection for one Resident (R15) of three residents reviewed for wound care. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for increased transmission of infectious organisms between the environment and/or contaminated hands during wound care. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST), unless otherwise noted. During observation of R15's thoracic (back) wound on 10/22/24 at approximately 7:50 a.m., revealed the dressing was dated 10/21/24. The dressing was bunched up on the bottom, and not properly sealed onto R15's skin. The black sweatshirt R15 was wearing was visibly soiled with the oozing drainage from the wound, which had saturated the dressing and spilled out onto the sweatshirt. During an interview at this same time, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D was asked about the drainage that had escaped R15's wound dressing unto their clothing. LPN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0917 — isolated
  Make sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable mattress and functional, intact shelving for clothing storage for one Resident (R15) of 13 sample residents reviewed for comfortable and functional furniture. This deficient practice resulted in the use of an under-inflated, uncomfortable mattress and a built in four-shelf drawer unit with the third drawer missing. Findings include: All times are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise noted. Review of R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/18/24, revealed R15 scored 14 of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflective of intact cognition. R15 had clear speech, understood others, and was able to make her needs known. During an interview on 10/21/24 at 2:52 p.m., when asked about care received in the facility, R15 stated, I am laying on a bed right now, and the lady came in from [Facility Corporation] and said, 'What is wrong with your bed'. I am lying on the springs . They took my good mattress, and I have been laying on this Mattress and [Regional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-12-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by: 1. Failing to ensure a food preparation staff person washed their hands after being potentially contaminated. 2. Failing to demonstrate proper testing of the concentration of sanitizing chemicals in the three compartment sink and wiping buckets. 3. Failing to properly label and date food removed from the original packaging which was re-packaged and frozen. These deficient practices have the potential to result in food borne illness among any and all 26 residents of the facility. Findings include: (All times are reported in EST) 1. On 11/30/23 at approximately 11:45 AM, [NAME] B was observed wiping up something from the floor, with a paper towel, near the three compartment sink. [NAME] B disposed of the paper towel which was used to clean the floor, then donned a pair of gloves and began with food preparation duties without washing her hands. The FDA Food Code 2017 states: 2-301.14 When…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATRIUM CENTERS — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $622K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI