No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mulder Health Care Facility

713 Leonard St N, West Salem, WI 54669 · For profit - Corporation · 87 certified beds · (608) 786-1600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0741)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$200,694 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $200,694 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-14)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1555 Heritage Blvd · (608) 612-6122 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
880 Mill St N · (608) 788-4500 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
635 W City Highway 16 · (608) 786-1730 · Call to confirm hours
Park
W3373 WI-16 · (608) 785-9770 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.0%16.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.4%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.9%2.1%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%2.7%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%5.7%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.4%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.2%18.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.1%16.9%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.8%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%5.0%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.7%24.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.5%15.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.7%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.0%82.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.1%23.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.7%15.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.971.661.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.452.291.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
44.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 44.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.4%CMS range 34.2–53.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.4%CMS range 5.7–11.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge44.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge23.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge32.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge91.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.7%CMS range 5.1–14.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.201.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.08
RN hours/ resident / day
0.35
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.99
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.80
RN hoursweekends
44.6%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 87 beds and averages 77.3 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.08 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.20 to 0.80 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-14)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-22)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. This had the potential to affect all residents residing within the facility at the time of an outbreak on 1/2/25. This outbreak involved 49 out of 83 residents and 37 staff. As of 1/2/25, the facility was in a GI (gastrointestinal) outbreak with 2 staff and 1 resident with noted signs and symptoms of GI outbreak. - Facility staff line listings were not completed contemporaneously. - Temporary Care plans were not started for residents with GI signs and symptoms. - Residents with orders for Laxatives and Diuretics continued to take their prescribed medication without any monitoring for dehydration or bowel movement consistency and frequency. - Staff returned to work too soon following GI signs and symptoms. - Facility does not indicate when residents were taken off precautions following GI signs and symptoms. - Housekeeping did not ensure they cleaned non symptomatic resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-04-14 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
    Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not have sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide direct nursing and behavioral health related services to assure resident safety for each resident to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 1 sampled resident (R11) and 1 of 1 supplemental residents reviewed (R55). R11 had expressed suicidal ideations related to his chronic pain (phantom limb pain) multiple times in the two months preceding R11 stabbing himself in the chest with scissors due to unrelieved pain. R11 was hospitalized for a self-inflicted stab wound to his chest and placed on an emergency psychiatric detention as a result of his suicide attempt. Following this incident, the resident returned to the facility and continued to express suicidal ideation and uncontrolled pain. Although R11 has had sharp objects removed from his room since the incident on 5/24/24, adequate supervision has not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for needing assistance or supervision with meals. On 10/13/24, R1 was in the dining room for her supper meal. R1 was attempting to eat soup and spilled the soup onto herself causing 2nd degree burns to her right arm and abdomen. R1 required supervision during meals; supervision and assistance were not provided. Soup temperature following R1 suffering burns and after meal service was 177 degrees. The facility's failure to provide adequate supervision and assistance during meals and the failure to ensure foods and fluids were served at a temperature that would not cause burns created a finding of immediate jeopardy which began on 10/13/24. Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A was notified of the immediate jeopardy on 10/30/24 at 9:30 AM. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 10/30/24; however, the deficient practice continues at a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate fluid intake to maintain acceptable parameters of hydration for 1 of 4 Residents (R19) reviewed for nutrition. On 3/7 - 3/13/25 R19 was hospitalized with aspiration pneumonia and received intravenous fluids during his hospitalization. On 3/17-3/19/25 R19 was hospitalized with dehydration requiring intravenous fluids. R19 was consistently not meeting his daily recommended fluid intake of greater than 1,400 ml (milliliters). R19 had a significant weight loss of 10.9% from 3/7/25 - 3/26/25. The facility failed to ensure R19 received adequate fluid intakes to maintain acceptable parameters of hydration by failing to total and assess daily fluid intake; accurately assess and complete on going assessments for signs and symptoms of dehydration (e.g., sunken eyes, cool/clammy skin, dry tongue, dark colored urine, and sticky saliva); failure to weigh resident weekly; failure to weigh resident upon readmission to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-12-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 7 residents (R33 and R16) reviewed for falls received assistance devices to prevent accidents. The facility failed to implement a fall prevention measure for R33; as a result, R33 sustained a fall on 12/10/22 which resulted in a fractured hip. R33 was then placed on hospice services and passed away. In addition, the facility removed a U-bar (a device attached to a medical bed to assist with positioning), without assessing R16 for safety. R16 used the U-bar to assist him in and out of bed. When the U-bar was removed by the facility, R16 took a folding chair and attached the chair with a gait-belt to the bed frame and used it as a transferring device. Findings include: Review of a document provided by the facility titled Fall Prevention and Management Program, dated 01/22 indicated .Atrium Centers has established a standardized policy with guidelines that assigns responsibility and provides…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-22 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four Residents (R)2, R3, R4 and R5) of a total of 16 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect/misappropriation were free from misappropriation of funds when money was stolen from each of the residents by a staff member (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA1)). The facility's failure to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property/funds created the potential for these and other residents to experience psychosocial harm related to the misappropriation and/or continued misappropriation of property/funds. A total of 16 residents were reviewed in the sample. Findings include:1. Review of R2's Resident Face Sheet, dated 01/22/26 and found in the EMR under the CCD Tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Adult Failure to Thrive and heart disease. The resident was discharged from the facility on 12/17/25. Review of R2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed. This failure placed 78 of the 79 residents in the facility at risk for nutritional problems and dissatisfaction with their meals. Findings include:1. A review of the week three menu provided to the survey team indicated that on 01/20/26 the dinner meal would be Minestrone Soup, Saltines, Grilled Cheese sandwich, Lettuce, Tomato, Onion, French Fries, Apple Slices, Ketchup, Margarine, 2% (percent) milk and/or coffee. However, during the meal observation at 5:15 PM, residents were served a dinner consisting of Minestrone soup, a grilled cheese sandwich, canned pears, and a choice of 2% milk, coffee, or juice. There was no observation of French fries, apple slices, lettuce, tomato and onions as documented on the menu, A review of the week three menu for lunch on 01/21/26 would include Chili with Beans, Baked Potato, Sweet Potato Cornbread, Red Grapes, Sour Cream and Chives, Margarine, and 2% milk, coffee, or tea.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen staff prevented contamination of food containers while taking food temperatures and also when the kitchen staff was placing lids on the bowls that contained food the residents would eat. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of foodborne illness for 78 of the facility's 78 residents. During an observation on 01/21/26 at 11:20 AM, Cook1 was observed taking food temperatures of the Chili with Beans, Mashed Potatoes, and pureed Mixed Vegetables. Cook1 was observed to touch the inside of each of these food containers with her bare hand while taking the food temperatures.During an observation on 01/21/26 at 11:28 AM, Dietary Aide (DA)1 was observed touching the inside of the lids with her bare hands while placing the lids on the bowls of Chil with Beans and then placing these bowls on the resident's trays.During an interview on 01/21/26 at 2:01 PM, Cook1 stated, I was not aware that I did that. You are not to touch the inside of the food containers with your hand when you are taking the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure consistent and comprehensive management of nutritional services for one Resident (R ) R14) out of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility's failure to ensure consistent nutritional interventions were provided for R67 created the potential for this and other residents to experience significant/unanticipated weight loss or nutritional deficits. A total of 50 residents were reviewed in the sample. Findings include:Review of R14's Resident Face Sheet, dated 01/22/25 and found in the EMR under the Continuity of Care Document (CCD) Tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses included dementia, chronic and acute kidney disease and cellulitis of her left lower limb. Review of R14's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/12/26 and found in the EMR under the MDS tab, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to put measures in place to prevent further abuse, following an allegation of abuse, for 1 of 1 allegation reviewed. This has the potential to affect a pattern of the facility's 75 residents. On 09/09/25, allegations of potential abuse were reported against Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) G. CNA G was allowed to continue working with residents for the rest of that shift and worked again on 09/11/25 and 09/12/25 during the facility's investigation. This is evidenced by:The facility policy, titled Abuse Prevention Program, dated last reviewed 01/2025, states in part: Upon recognizing signs/symptoms of stressed staff, the observer will take action which may include but is not limited to. relieve the staff member of direct care duties.The investigation must include but not limited to: Identify alleged perpetrator, remove from resident care area immediately, suspend pending investigation conclusion, obtain statement.R4 was admitted to the facility in 2023, with diagnoses including, gastroenteritis, rheumatoid arthritis,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident remained free from abuse for 1 of 8 sampled residents (R4).R4 was spoken to in a manner that is described by the resident as abusive; the resident also states that staff did not release her wrist as requested.The facility policy, titled Abuse Prevention Program, dated last reviewed 01/2025, states, Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect and corporal punishment of any type by staff or anyone. Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish.R4 was admitted to the facility in 2024, with diagnoses including, gastroenteritis, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, weakness, and anxiety disorder. R4 is alert and oriented and able to make her needs known.Surveyor interviewed R4 on 09/16/25 at 10:30 AM. When asked if she had had any recent care concerns, R4 responded that the other night a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), CNA G, had been haughty, condescending, and dictatorial,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 1 resident incidents reviewed. (R4)R4 was spoken to in a manner that is described by the resident as abusive; the resident also stated that staff did not release her wrist as requested. This was not reported to the state survey agency within 24 hours.This is evidenced by:The facility policy, titled Abuse Prevention Program, dated last reviewed 01/2025, states in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, 1 of 8 sampled residents (R1) was not provided with supervision to prevent accidents.R1 was being transferred to the bathroom via EZ stand when her shoulder was bumped into the door frame; the CNA staff who were assisting the resident at the time did not report this incident to the charge nurse.This is evidenced by: The facility policy, titled Resident Incident/Accident Reporting Protocol, dated reviewed 01/2025, states, All incidents and accidents (regardless of how minor they may present) must be reported to the Charge Nurse immediately upon discovery with a completed applicable event report and communicated to the oncoming shift.R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including, right sided hemiplegia, impaired mobility, hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, chronic pain, and osteoarthritis.Surveyor reviewed a witness statement written by Registered Nurse (RN) C on 08/23/25, which states in part: During AM medication pass, resident was complaining of 10/10 pain in right arm. Resident stated last night (8/22) . was being transferred by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-14 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the facility wide assessment developed by the facility included all relevant details to ensure the facility provided care and services to residents to meet their individual needs within the facility's identified resources. This has the potential to affect all 76 residents residing in the facility. The facility assessment does not indicate: - How many residents the facility can safely care for with suicidal ideation - How many residents the facility can safely care for with PTSD or a history of trauma - How many staff members are required to safely care for residents with suicidal ideation - How many staff members are required to safely care for residents with PTSD or a history of trauma - Staff training required to care for residents with suicidal ideation and/or PTSD or a history of trauma This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Facility Assessment, dated 1/2025 states in part: Policy: This facility conducts and documents a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for our…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not identify issues to which quality assessment and assurance activities are necessary or develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. This is evidenced by the number and seriousness of citations during this recertification survey, which has the potential to affect all 76 residents who reside in the facility. During this recertification survey from 4/7/25 through 4/14/25, the facility had multiple citations including F880 L, F741 J with 2 examples, F692 G, and F838 F. The facility Quality Assurance Committee has failed to identify key areas of deficient practice and implement action plans to correct these deficient practices. 1. Sufficient/competent Staff-Behavioral Health Needs 2. Infection Control 3. Nutrition/hydration Status Maintenance 4. Facility Assessment This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvements (QAPI), last reviewed 1/2025, states in part . Policy: It is the policy of facility to develop, implement, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure the environment remained free of hazards for 4 of 4 supplemental residents (R12, R66, R68 and R70) who smoke. R12 was observed outside smoking, on the sidewalk in the front of the facility, with no receptacle to dispose of her cigarette butts in the area. R66 was observed outside smoking, on the patio in the smoking area, with a small receptacle to dispose his cigarette butts. In the same area was a plastic garbage can with a large amount of cigarette butts in it. R68 and R70 are indicated as being smokers and the facility does not have an appropriate receptacle for smoking material to be disposed into. Evidenced by: The facility Smoking Policy, reviewed 01/2024, includes, in part, the following: Purpose: To offer a safe environment to all residents in the facility. 15.2 Procedure. 8. All smoking materials will be disposed of in the proper designated containers that meet NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) standards. On 4/9/25 at 7:00 AM Surveyor observed R12 sitting in her wheelchair, on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-14 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to assess for risk of entrapment between the mattress and side rail and failed to identify and recognize that the use of side rails with an air mattress increases the risk for entrapment for 3 of 3 sampled residents (R73, R46 and R25) and 2 of 2 supplemental Residents (R49 and R54) reviewed for bed rails. R73, R46, R54, R25 and R49 all have an air mattress with enabler bars/bedrails. The facility did not complete all requirements as listed in F700 of the State Operations Manual prior to installing bed rails/enabler bars. The facility failed to complete a safety/gap test with the air mattress and provide written documentation of ongoing monitoring of bed rails. Findings include According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), The FDA recommends the following actions to prevent deaths and injuries from entrapment and falls from adult portable bed rails: . When installing and using bed rails: *Confirm that the age,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident receives food and drink that is palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature. This has the potential to affect more than a minimal number of residents residing at the facility. Residents voiced concerns with hot foods being served cold. (R45, R25, R14, and R11) 3 of 3 test trays were observed to not be served at desirable temperatures. Evidenced by: The facility Resident Council Minutes included, in part, the following: 3/3/25: Dietary: resident specific requests. Note there was no further explanation what the requests were. 12/2/24: Cold food, has improved. 11/4/24: Food coming cold. Example 1 R45 was admitted to the facility 11/8/24. R45's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 2/14/25 indicates R45 is cognitively intact. On 4/7/25 at 2:10 PM Surveyor interviewed R45 about his meals. R45 stated the food was often served cold and tasted awful. R45 stated he has told…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, facility did not implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property. The facility did not conduct thorough background checks on 2 of 8 employees that were randomly selected. Findings include The facility's abuse prevention program states, in part: *The facility will conduct thorough investigations of histories of prospective staff, in addition to inquiry of the state, nurse aid registry or licensing authorities prior to employment. *The facility will obtain verification of screening prior to employment or engagement for prospective consultants, contractors, volunteers, caregivers and students and its nurse aid training program and students from affiliated academic institutions, including therapy, social, and activity programs. Screening may be conducted by the facility itself, third party agency, or academic institution. It is recognized that state specific regulatory requirements may require additional limitations to be followed. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 of 22 sampled residents (R45 & R18) reviewed for abuse. Facility did not report an incident of resident-to-resident altercation involving R45 and R18 to the State Agency (SA). Evidenced by: The facility Abuse Prevention Program Policy and Procedure reviewed 01/2025, includes, in part, the following: VII. Reporting/Response. All alleged or suspected violations are to be reported immediately to the Administrator or Director of Nursing, which are responsible to notify required official, including to the State Survey Agency, . and any other agencies in accordance with State law through established procedures. All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not have evidence that all alleged violations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for 2 of 22 sampled residents (R45 and R18) reviewed for abuse. Facility did not fully investigate an incident of resident-to-resident altercation involving R45 and R18 to the State Agency (SA). Evidenced by: The facility Abuse Prevention Program Policy and Procedure reviewed 01/2025, includes, in part, the following: V. Investigation. 1. The Administrator and or Director of Nursing are to initiate and coordinate completion of a thorough investigation. Investigations must be initiated immediately and concluded as soon as possible not to exceed (5) days. Example 1 On 4/7/25 at 1:55 PM Surveyor interviewed R45. R45 indicated in early March he had altercation with his former roommate (R18). R45's Resident Progress Notes include, in part, the following: 03/04/2025 08:31 PM Resident and roommate had altercation this shift. Roommate did not like that resident had tv on loud and was speaking on phone on speaker. Roommate started saying negative things…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit a resident to return to the facility following a hospitalization for 1 of 1 sampled resident (R11) and 1 of 1 supplemental residents (R55) reviewed. R11 was not permitted to return to the facility following an emergency facility-initiated transfer to the hospital. The facility discharged R11 and stated they would not allow R11 to return. R55 was not permitted to return to the facility following an emergency facility-initiated transfer to the hospital. The facility discharged R55 and would not allow R55 to return. It should be noted R55's guardian wished for R55 to return to the facility and R55 was pending Medicaid approval at the time of discharge. Example 1 R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include: type 2 diabetes with diabetic polyneuropathy (damage to multiple peripheral nerves causing pain, tingling, burning, numbness or sensitivity to touch), acquired absence of limb (amputation), phantom limb syndrome with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a facility-initiated discharge, failed to ensure the written notice contained all pertinent information for a discharge notice including the location to which the resident is transferred or discharged , a statement of the resident's appeal rights, and the name and address of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 1 of 1 sampled resident (R11) and 1 of 1 supplemental residents (R55) reviewed for facility-initiated discharge. The facility failed to notify R11 and R55 in writing prior to a facility-initiated discharge, did not give R11 or R55 a chance to appeal the facility-initiated discharge, and did not appropriately prepare R11 or R55 for the facility-initiated discharge. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Resident Transfers and Discharge Notification, dated 1/2025, states in part: . Procedure: Facility-initiated transfer or discharge - Involuntary Discharge The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility for 1 of 1 sampled resident (R11) and 1 of 1 supplemental residents (R55) reviewed for facility-initiated discharge. The facility failed to notify R11 and R55 in writing prior to a facility-initiated discharge, and did not appropriately prepare R11 or R55 for the facility-initiated discharge. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Resident Transfers and Discharge Notification, dated 1/2025, states in part: . Procedure: Facility-initiated transfer or discharge - Involuntary Discharge The facility will provide written notice in a language the resident or resident's representative can understand. The notice must also be provided to an immediate family member or legal representative. Written notice will be given at least 30 days before the proposed discharge. In specific circumstances written notice may need…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not provide written information to the resident or resident representative regarding the bed hold policy for 1 (R55) of 1 supplemental resident's reviewed for facility-initiated discharge R55 is not his own person and has two guardians. Neither guardian was provided with a written bed hold prior to R55 being transferred to the hospital on 4/10/24. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Bed Hold, dated, 1/2025, states, in part: . Policy: Our facility allows residents to hold or reserve a bed while absent from the facility due to hospitalization or therapeutic leave. This policy applies to all residents regardless of payment source and will be provided to the resident or resident's representative at the time of admission and again with any emergency transfer from the community . Procedure: 1. The facility Social Worker or designee will provide a copy of the bed hold policy to the resident and/or the resident representative at the time of admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit 1 of 1 sampled resident (R11) and 1 of 1 supplemental residents (R55) reviewed for facility-initiated discharge to return to the facility after a hospitalization and the ability to return to the facility. R11 and R55 were not allowed to return to the facility following an emergency facility-initiated transfer to the emergency room. The facility stated they would be discharging R11 and R55 due to inability to provide the staffing level needed to care for R11 and R55. It should be noted R11 signed a bed hold and the facility had a bed hold for R55 that stated the family gave verbal consent to hold the bed and would pay the bed hold charges. Example 1 R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include: type 2 diabetes with diabetic polyneuropathy (damage to multiple peripheral nerves causing pain, tingling, burning, numbness or sensitivity to touch), acquired absence of limb (amputation), phantom limb syndrome w/pain (sensation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 22 residents reviewed for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) (R34). R34 requested to use the bathroom. CNA EEE (Certified Nursing Assistant) told R34 she is on a two (2) hour toileting schedule and will need to wait. R34 was waiting approximately 1 hour and 20 minutes before being assisted to the bathroom. Evidenced by: The facility's policy, Activities of Daily Living, dated 3/2023, includes, in part, as follows: It is the policy of the facility to specify the responsibility to create and sustain an environment that humanizes and individualizes each resident's quality of life by ensuring all staff, across all shifts and departments, understand the principles of quality of life, and honor and support these principles for each resident; and that the care and services provided are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure injuries (R73). R73 had a pressure reducing air mattress for pressure injury healing and was observed laying on the mattress with multiple layers under R73. Findings include A study published on the National Library of Medicine titled The Effect of Multiple Layers of Linens on Surface Interface Pressure: Results of a Laboratory Study concluded that excessive linen usage for patients on therapeutic support surfaces (such as air mattresses) should be discouraged. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23749661/ R73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include malignant neoplasm of bone (bone cancer) and an unstageable pressure ulcer of sacral region (resident's bottom). R73 was admitted to the facility with orders for an air mattress. Surveyor confirmed this air mattress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide medically related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 1 of 1 sampled resident (R11) and 1 of 1 supplemental resident (R55). R11 stabbed himself with a pair of scissors after experiencing uncontrolled phantom limb pain. Prior to this, R11 had expressed suicidal ideations related to his chronic pain multiple times in the two months prior to this event. R11 was hospitalized for a self-inflicted stab wound to his chest and placed on an emergency psychiatric detention as a result of his suicide attempt. Following this incident, the resident returned to the facility and continued to express suicidal ideation and uncontrolled pain. No trauma assessment was completed or PHQ-9s (depression screening) following suicidal statements. R55 expressed suicidal ideations multiple times between his admission date of 8/5/24 and his discharge date of 4/10/25.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not provide food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 1 sampled resident (R48). The facility has not reassessed R48's swallowing ability after she was unable to wear her lower denture due to an abscess to ensure she receives food prepared in a form that meets her needs. As evidenced by The facility's policy, Diet Order, revised 1/2025, documents, in part, as follows: During the course of the resident's stay, any diet change as recommended by the Dietician, Diet Technician, Speech Language Pathologist, or Nurse should be communicated to the attending M.D. (Medical Doctor). for consideration. Nursing may downgrade a diet texture temporarily for example: oral problems, difficulty swallowing/chewing, mouth sores, etc. R48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, as follows: diabetes mellitus type 2 (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar which also impedes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility did not immediately consult with the resident's physician when 1 of 3 sampled residents (R1) experienced a significant change or required a change in treatment. R1's physician was not consulted when R1's oxygen saturation and pulse fell below the desired range. This is evidenced by the following: The facility policy and procedure Notification of Change, last reviewed 1/24, states, in part: Introduction: The Residents physician and responsible party must be notified when an event involving the resident occurs or when the resident experiences a change of condition, potential discharge, room transfer for death. Notification Parameters: [Facility] has adopted the current INTERACT Tools Change of Condition: When to report to the MD (Medical Doctor)/NP (Nurse Practitioner)/PA (Physician Assistant). The INTERACT program is an evidence-based program that may be utilized by the nurse when needed and does not supersede the clinical judgement of the licensed nurse. A Physicians personal request for notification of a condition may supersede…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure all incidents involving potential abuse were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 4 residents (R) 6. R6 swung arm out and hit R5 in the chest as R5 came by in R5's wheelchair. Facility did not interview other residents in the facility for potential abuse. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program Policy and Procedure, revised 06/2023, states: Intent: Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and corporal punishment of any type by staff or anyone. The facility will provide a safe resident environment and protect residents from abuse. Resident-to-Resident Abuse A resident-to-resident altercation should be reviewed as a potential situation of abuse. The facility Administrator and/or Director of Nursing will initiate an investigation of a potential allegation of abuse between residents. V. Investigation: 1. The Administer and/or Director of Nursing are to initiate and coordinate completion of a thorough investigation. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-22 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not designate a person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services who had completed the minimum qualification requirements for the position. This practice could potentially affect 75 of 76 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 02/19/24 at 8:55 AM, Surveyor toured the kitchen with Dietary Supervisor (DS) M and asked their qualifications they held that allowed them to assume the role of Dietary Supervisor. DS M indicated DS M started in the position the end of December 2023 and was not enrolled in any classes and was unaware when DS M would be. DS M indicated DS M did not have a certification to be a dietary manager. On 02/20/24 at 2:33 PM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A and asked if the dietician was full time and provided oversight of the kitchen. NHA A indicated the dietician was there 2 days a week and they have a regional dietician that is available by phone. Surveyor asked when the dietician is at the facility if the dietician conducts kitchen supervision and completes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility did not prepare and distribute food under sanitary conditions. Dishwasher temperatures did not reach correct levels, staff did not perform hand hygiene with glove use, and staff with a beard did not wear a beard net. This has the potential to affect 75 of 76 residents. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Glove Usage By Dietary Staff, revised 8/23, reads in part Never handle food with your bare hands or gloved hand while serving. The facility policy, entitled Dietary Dress Code, revised 8/23, reads in part [NAME] covers must be worn by staff presenting with facial hair. Example 1 On 02/20/24 at 11:05 AM, Surveyor observed dish machine wash and rinse temperature log. On the bottom of the log it says, High Temp Machine: wash/rinse 160, Sanitize 180. Surveyor asked Dietary Supervisor (DS) M about the dishwasher temperatures not always making it up to 180. DS M indicated they didn't know it needed to get to that. Surveyor pointed out to DS M that on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility did not ensure residents (R) were treated with respect and dignity and cared for in a manner to enhance their quality of life. Facility staff used a clothing protector to wipe R37 and R35's face during dining. Facility staff were heard sharing R30, R54, R1, and R24's personal information in public areas of the facility. Facility staff did not respond in a respectful manner to R14. This occurred for 7 of 76 residents. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Dignity, dated reviewed on 01/24, states in part: Dignity means that in their interactions with residents . Demonstrating courtesy, patience, and friendliness in all interactions . Provision of care instruction in privacy . Promoting residents' independence and dignity in dining. The facility policy, entitled Privacy, Dignity, and Confidentiality dated reviewed 01/2024, states in part: Reporting of care and services of any resident between staff should be done in a private manner that cannot be overheard by others. Example 1 On 02/19/24 at 11:51 AM, Surveyor observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 5 of 76 residents (R). (R52, R28, R60, R233, and R70) Staff observed passing medication without proper hand hygiene. Staff observed rinsing a urine soiled commode bucket in the resident's bathroom sink. Findings: The facility policy entitled, HAND WASHING/HAND HYGIENE, last reviewed 01/2024, stated in part: .Wash hands and other skin surfaced when: .2. After removing gloves or other personal protective equipment; 3. After care of each resident; 4. Before and after nursing treatments or procedures (dressing changes, catheter insertion, eye drop instillation, etc.) . Example 1 On 02/20/24 at 7:06 AM, Surveyor observed medication pass with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) I. LPN I performed no hand hygiene before entering room of R52 after touching the medication cart, computer mouse and computer keyboard.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not complete the required Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR) screens for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, (R18). This is evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Resident Assessment PASRR Requirements, dated 11/28/17, states: .To ensure each resident in a nursing facility is screened for a mental disorder (MD) or intellectual disability (ID) prior to admission and that individuals identified with MD or ID are evaluated and receive care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs .If the resident meets criteria for a level II review (mental illness, developmental disability, antipsychotic medication use, or any state requirements), the Level II request must be submitted to the State assigned entity for decision of placement prior to admission .Significant change in condition Level I requests must be completed and submitted to the State entity when a resident has a change in their mental health status, antipsychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not develop comprehensive person centered care plans for 3 of 21 sampled residents. (R1, R30, and R7) This is evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Resident Assessment Care Plan Development, dated updated on 05/24/2022, states in part: Reflect changes in the residents' preferences and goals as they change throughout their stay .The comprehensive care plan will be developed and maintained .Updates will be made to the comprehensive care plan as needed. Example 1 R1 was admitted to the facility in October 2023 and has diagnoses that include chronic respiratory failure, obstructive sleep apnea, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, and schizophrenia. R1's care plan dated 10/26/23 document, goal resident will be clean/well-groomed daily approaches include. POSSIBLE .EXAMPLES .LIKES TO WEAR JEWELRY, LIKES TO WEAR A HAT, LIKES TO WEAR MAKEUP, LIKES TO WEAR SUSPENDERS LIKES TO HAVE A LAP BLANKET ON WHEN UP. DELETE IF NOT APPLICABLE. Observations of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not revise or update resident (R) care plans for 1 of 21 sampled residents (R35). This is evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Resident Assessment Care Plan Development, updated on 05/24/2022, states in part: Reflect changes in the residents' preferences and goals as they change throughout their stay .Updates will be made to the comprehensive care plan as needed. R35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Parkinsonism, adult failure to thrive, and R35 is currently on hospice. R35's care plan lists approaches under activities; including: Visitors: Family window visits. R35's care plan lists goals; including: Will not deteriorate in ability to ambulate AEB: ability to ambulate 50 feet independently with walker. The Short Term Goal Target Date: 05/07/2024 On 02/21/24 at 10:00 AM, Surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) W and asked if R35 could walk independently. CNA W confirmed R35 does not have the ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with a pressure injury (PI) or at risk for PIs received necessary treatment and services, frequent repositioning, pressure relieving interventions that are consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of PIs and to promote healing for 3 of 6 residents (R) reviewed for PIs. (R74, R23, and R25) Findings include: According to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline, 2019, .Reposition all individuals with or at risk of pressure injuries on an individualized schedule, unless contraindicated. Determine repositioning frequency with consideration to the individual's level of activity and ability to independently reposition. Reposition the individual in such a way that optimal offloading of all bony prominences and maximum redistribution of pressure is achieved .Reposition the individual to relieve or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure to obtain rationale for catheter use and physician's order for a catheter for 1 of 4 sampled residents (R)7. Finding include: R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, dysphasia, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, and hypertension. The diagnosis list did not have a diagnosis related for the use of a catheter. Surveyor reviewed R7's physician orders. The physician orders did not have an order for the size of the catheter and balloon, when the catheter could be changed, and diagnosis. On 12/12/23, R7 was discharged from the hospital back to the facility with a catheter for urinary retention and orders to follow up with urology. Surveyor was unable to locate documentation in the medical record that a follow up appointment was done. On 02/22/24 at 12:39 PM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON) B and Regional Clinical Director (RCD) C and asked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program according to professional standards of practice when COVID precautions of appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) were not followed and employee fit testing for N95 masks were outdated. This has the potential to affect all 76 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Covid-19 Prevention, Response and Reporting, dated 05/2023, states: .HCP [Health Care Provider] who enter the room of a resident with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 [COVID] infection should adhere to standard precautions and use a NIOSH [National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health] approved particulate respirator with N95 filters or higher, gown, gloves, and eye protection (contact and droplet precautions) . Upon entrance of the complaint survey on 12/14/23, 42 of the 76 residents were positive for COVID. On 12/14/23 at 8:10 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-15 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 5 residents (R) of 5 sampled residents (R3, R4, R5, R6, R7) were provided the most recent covid booster, the covid booster was not offered or provided to any residents in the facility having the potential to affect all 76 residents that reside in the facility. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled Covid-19 Vaccine Program, dated 09/2023, states: It is the policy of this facility to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting or experiencing complications from COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) by educating and offering our residents and staff the COVID-19 vaccine .Covid-19 vaccinations currently in use include the updated (2023-2024 Formula) mRNA COVID-19 vaccines .People ages 65 years and older are recommended to receive 1 dose of updated (2023-2024 formula) mRNA vaccine .COVID-19 vaccinations will be offered to residents when supplies are available, as per CDC and/or FDA guidelines .The facility will educate and offer the COVID-19 vaccine to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, review of Facility Reported Incident (FRI), and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident (R) 3) of three residents reviewed for abuse was free from physical abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility provided Alleged Nursing Home Resident Mistreatment, Neglect, and Abuse Report (initial report) dated 05/07/23 revealed R3 was hit on the arm by fellow resident [R2] with a roll of toilet paper. Residents were separated to ensure safety. Family and police notified. Investigation initiated. Review of the Misconduct Incident Report (5-day report) dated 5/12/2023 revealed R2 hit R3 in the head with a roll of toilet paper. R3 did not have any pain or injury. Residents were immediately separated by staff. R3 was assisted back to room for a skin and pain assessment. R3 zero pain, injury, and redness. No other residents were affected by this incident. Residents separated immediately. R2 put on checks while in the dining room. Doctor, family, Director of Nursing (DON), Administrator notified. Care plan reviewed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report timely, within two hours and not later than 24 hours, for initial notification to the state survey agency (SSA), for three of three sampled residents (R2, R3, and R5) which included an allegation of an injury of unknown origin for R5 and a resident-to-resident incident for R2 and R3 reviewed for facility reported incidents (FRIs). Failure to report allegations of injuries of unknown origins and/or resident-to-resident incidents could potentially lead to abuse and neglect. Findings include: 1. Review of a FRI for R5, dated 06/28/23 revealed .Nurse Practitioner ordered an x-ray due to a change in condition with increased confusion. Chest Xray results indicate right shoulder dislocation. The origin of this injury is unknown. Resident is being kept safe with increased monitoring. Resident has chronic Right shoulder pain admitted with. No increase in pain. No redness or swelling. No additional signs and symptoms . Continued…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, and served in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. Findings include: Example 1: On 12/27/22 at 9:05 AM, the sanitizer in the red sanitizer bucket with wiping cloths was measured using a test strip by the DM M (Dietary Manager). The quaternary sanitizer in the solution measured 0 parts per million (ppm). The DM stated she had prepared the solution that morning to keep the wiping cloths in and to sanitize the food contact surfaces. The DM verified it was not at the correct concentration to sanitize the food contact surfaces. She stated it should have been 150 to 400 ppm. The facility policy titled Sanitation Terminology with a revised date of 07/2016 stated the quaternary solutions should be at 150 to 400 ppm in order to sanitize food contact surfaces. Example 2: On 12/27/22 at 9:15 AM, a one-half gallon carton of strawberry lemonade juice was in the medication room nourishment/resident refrigerator located in the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-30 · tag F0572 — isolated
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 19 sampled residents (R230) was provided admission paperwork which included residents' rights and responsibilities. Findings include: Review of a document provided by the facility titled admission Policy, undated indicated .Prospective residents will be given a copy of [NAME] information Regarding Payment, Rights & Responsibilities, Services & Limitations, and all other applicable policies, prior to signing the Consent to Treat and admission Agreement, whenever practical . R230 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R230's admission Packet dated 12/23/22 indicated the resident's representative signed the admission paperwork, which included rights and responsibilities of the resident. There was a hand-written note at the top of the cover sheet which stated, None of this was filled out or signed until 12/27/22 I was asked to date it at 12/23/22. There was no name at the end of this hand-written statement nor were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 6 residents (R38) reviewed for abuse remained free from physical abuse. R38 was physically assaulted by R15 on 3 separate occasions. Findings include: The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention Program Policy and Procedure with a revised date of 01/22 stated Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and corporal punishment of any type by staff or anyone. The facility will provide a safe resident environment and protect residents from abuse. R15's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated no problems with her long-term and short-term memory; requiring modified independence with daily decision making; and being independent with bed mobility, transfers, walking, and locomotion. According to the assessment she exhibited verbal behaviors directed to others (threatening, screaming at others, cussing at others) during the 7 day look back period. Review of R38's annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility did not ensure that further potential abuse did not occur for 1 of 6 sampled residents (R38). R38 was physically assaulted by R15 on multiple occasions. Following each incident, the facility did not take action to ensure R38 was not further abused in the future. Findings include: Review of R15's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R15 had no problems with her long-term and short-term memory; requiring modified independence with daily decision making; and was independent with transfers, walking, and locomotion. According to the assessment, R15 exhibited verbal behaviors directed to others (threatening, screaming at others, cussing at others) during the 7 day look back period. R15's plan of care has a problem start date of 09/14/21 stating, resident has had altercations with another resident. Staff updated on whom. The approach dated of 09/14/21 stated to Attempt to keep residents separated if able. Redirect when needed. Report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility pharmacy policy review, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 6 residents' (R13) medication regimens was free from medication irregularities. R13 had an order for as needed lorazepam (a psychotropic medication). There was no 14 day stop order. This irregularity was not identified during 5 monthly reviews. Findings include: Review of a document provided by the facility titled Drug Regimen Review for [NAME] Health Care Facility dated 02/01/21 indicated .To ensure timely pharmacist conducted drug regimen review (DRR) for every resident, including guidelines for documentation and communication to nursing, practitioners, and administrative team .Irregularities and recommendations identified during DRR will be printed, including date, resident name, medication name, and irregularity, by the pharmacist and provided to the charge nurse for distribution to practitioners for review at their next scheduled visit . R13 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R13's physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility documents and policy, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 6 residents (R13) reviewed for unnecessary medications did not receive an as needed psychotropic medication for greater than 14 days. R13 had 2 orders for as needed lorazepam. There were no stop orders for either order. R13 received the as needed lorazepam for greater than 14 days without the prescriber evaluating and documenting the clinical indications for the continued use and duration of therapy out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Review of a document provided by the facility titled Psychotropic Medication Use, dated 09/22 indicated .PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. Except if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she must document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order. The attending physician or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices for 1 of 4 residents (R180) observed during medication administration. Nursing staff placed medications directly on an unclean surface. Findings include: On 12/30/22 at 7:46 AM, LPN O (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered medications to R180. LPN O poured R180's pills out of the medication cup and on to the bedside table. LPN O did not clean the table or place a barrier before pouring out the pills. R180 then picked up each medication one at a time until she had taken them all. During an interview on 12/30/22 at 8:03 AM, LPN O was asked if the bedside table where he poured R180's pills was clean. LPN O stated probably not, to be quite honest with you. LPN O stated further that R180 lacked the finger dexterity to handle pills from the medication cup, and that he let R180 pick up the pills herself to preserve her independence. During an interview with DON B (Director of Nursing) on 12/30/22 at 12:18 PM, DON B was told of the foregoing observations. The DON stated that it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$200,694 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $186,261 — penalty dated 2025-04-14
  • $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-11-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ATRIUM CENTERS — 26 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.0-2.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
The other 25 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Marshall Nursing and Rehabilitation CommunityMarshall, MI 1 of 5Riverside Nursing CentreGrand Haven, MI 2 of 5Allendale Nursing and Rehabilitation CommunityAllendale, MI 2 of 5Plainwell Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation CommuniPlainwell, MI 2 of 5Roosevelt Park Nursing and Rehabilitation CommunitMuskegon, MI 2 of 5South Haven Nursing and Rehabilitation CommunitySouth Haven, MI 2 of 5The Timbers of Cass CountyDowagiac, MI 2 of 5Tomah Nursing And RehabTomah, WI 2 of 5Westgate Nursing & Rehabilitation CommunityIronwood, MI 3 of 5Austinburg Nsg And Rehab CtrAustinburg, OH 3 of 5Crittenden County Health & Rehabilitation CenterMarion, KY 3 of 5Frederic Nursing And Rehab CommunityFrederic, WI 3 of 5Lincoln Haven Nursing & Rehabilitation CommunityLincoln, MI 3 of 5Prescott Nursing And Rehab CommunityPrescott, WI 3 of 5Salem Springlake Health & Rehabilitation CenterSalem, KY 3 of 5Woodside Village Care CenterMount Gilead, OH 4 of 5Blossom Nursing And Rehab CenterSalem, OH 4 of 5Fairview Nursing and Rehabilitation CommunityCentreville, MI 4 of 5Gladwin Nursing and Rehabilitation CommunityGladwin, MI 4 of 5Grayling Nursing & Rehabilitation CommunityGrayling, MI 4 of 5Heritage Nursing and Rehabilitation CommunityZeeland, MI 4 of 5Lexington Court Care CenterLexington, OH 5 of 5Freeman Nursing & Rehabilitation CommunityKingsford, MI 5 of 5Hillcrest Nursing and Rehabilitation CommunityNorth Muskegon, MI 5 of 5King Nursing & Rehabilitation CommunityHoughton Lake, MI

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ORION OPERATING SERVICES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 08/20/2019
BAILEY, ESSELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER74%since 12/09/2019
FINNEY, DONALDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER25%since 12/09/2019
FIFTH THIRD BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/19/2022
STEWART, BRENDAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/18/2024
ALBRIGHT ROSS, SUSANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2018
AMICUS CAPITAL HOLDINGS INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/18/2021
ATRIUM CENTERS MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/18/2024
ATRIUM CENTERS, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/20/2019
ANDERSON, CURTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2025
CHERRY, JILLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
COGBILL, ELIZABETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
HAFNER, PAIGEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2025
JOHNSON, CINDYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/18/2024
SHEAR, NICKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/04/2024
SIDIE, ASHLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/24/2025
AMICUS CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/18/2021
AMICUS PROPERTIES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
BROAD RIVER REHABILITATIONOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2021
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023
GALESVILLE LTC PHARMAY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
LEADERSTAT LTDOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
OCS REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
ORION PROPERTIES NINETEEN LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2019
WIPFLI LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
PAREDES, MIGUELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/18/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 42 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$809K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 12%Other / private 27%

This home reported $809K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$308per resident / day
operating cost
$9,365per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$340per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525209. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next