Westwood Health and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 96.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 63.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 81% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observation, and resident, staff, and transportation driver interviews, the facility failed to provide safe transportation for Resident #1 when she was being transported by a contracted van transport company from dialysis back to the facility on 5/25/24. Resident #1's wheelchair was not secured to the floor securement system per the manufacturer's instructions. When Driver #1 accelerated the vehicle, Resident #1's wheelchair tipped backward, and the resident hit the right back side of her head. Driver #1 pulled the transportation van over to the shoulder of the road and called 911. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrived, assessed the resident, and determined she needed to go to the hospital for evaluation for her complaints of head pain. The accident occurred post hemodialysis and Resident #1 was prescribed and received Plavix (anticoagulant medication). There was a high likelihood of a serious adverse outcome for Resident #1 due to the resident's wheelchair not being secured to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and staff, Pharmacy Consultant, and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to administer scheduled medications as ordered by the physician for 6 of 32 residents on the D and E halls that were reviewed for medication administration (Residents #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9).The findings included: A. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia (a movement disorder defined by involuntary and uncontrollable muscle movements). Review of the active physician orders included the following orders:- An order dated 1/15/25 for ropinirole (a medication used to improve muscle control and manage movement) 0.25 milligrams (mg). Give one tablet by mouth three times a day for Parkinson's disease.- An order dated 1/16/25 for Benztropine Mesylate (a medication used to reduce muscle stiffness, body spasms and tremors) 0.5 mg. Give one tablet by mouth in the afternoon for dyskinesia.- An order dated 1/6/25 for Sinemet (a medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, Pharmacy Consultant, Medical Director and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient nursing staff in the facility on 5/16/26 from 1:00 PM to 5:00 PM to administer medications as ordered to the D and E halls for 6 of 32 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident's #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9).The findings included: This tag is cross referenced to: F658: Based on record reviews, Pharmacy Consultant, Medical Director and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer scheduled medications as ordered by the physician for 6 of 32 residents on the D and E halls that were reviewed for medication administration. (Residents ##4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9). The facility's daily assignment sheet dated 5/16/26 revealed the following nursing staff were scheduled to work during the day shift (7:00 AM to 7:00 PM) for medication administration. Nurse #1 was assigned to work on the A and F halls from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM), Nurse #2 was assigned to work on the B and C halls from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM, Medication Aide (MA) #1 was assigned to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to discard expired medications and date open multiple-dose medications in 2 of 3 medication carts (A and D medication carts) and 1 of 1 medication storage room observed.Findings included: a. On 2/15/26 at 12:35PM, the medication room was observed with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Nurse #2. There was one open undated vial of Apilsol Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) solution stored in the refrigerator (The manufacturer's storage instruction indicated once opened the solution should be discarded within 30 days). b. On 2/15/26 at 2:38 PM, the medication cart for hall A was observed with Nurse #4. The following expired and undated medications were observed in the cart:- One bottle of Nitroglycerin 0.4 milligram (mg) tablet - expiration date 1/2026,- Two Humalog Insulin KwikPens opened and undated (The manufacturer's Insulin storage instruction indicated once opened, Humalog should be stored at room temperature and used within 28 days),- One Insulin Glargine Injection Pen opened and undated (The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to label and date food items and maintain food in sealed containers in the kitchen. Specifically, the facility did not label and date cups of orange juice in 1 of 1 walk-in cooler; did not seal and label a box of frozen biscuits with the date opened in 1 of 1 walk-in freezer; did not keep a small container of pimento cheese sealed in 1 of 1 reach-in refrigerator; and seal and label a box of rice with the date opened in the dry storage area. These practices had the potential to affect the safety and quality of food served to residents. The findings included:1. An observation on 2/15/26 at 10:05 AM revealed the following in the reach-in refrigerator: One small metal container of pimento cheese was loosely covered with plastic wrap, leaving it exposed to air. The date written on the wrap was obscured.The [NAME] was interviewed during the initial observation on 2/15/26 at 10:05 AM. She stated the pimento cheese was made the morning of 2/15/26. The cook did not respond when asked about the pimento cheese not being sealed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to treat a resident in a dignified manner when there was a delay in answering a resident 's call light for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for dignity.The findings included:Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, acute arterial ischemic stroke, multifocal, bipolar I disorder, current manic with psychotic features and Schizophrenia.Resident #21's admission care plan dated 01/23/26 did not have a focus area for behaviors.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #21's cognition was intact. Resident #21 required moderate assistance by staff with oral hygiene, ambulating 10 feet, chair/bed to chair transfers, and personal hygiene, maximum assistance by staff with upper body dressing, bed mobility, and toileting transfers, and he was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, and to shower/bathe self. A continuous…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident, friend and staff and local Law Enforcement Officer interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from misappropriation of resident's property. This affected 1 of 1 resident reviewed for misappropriation (Resident #19).The findings included: Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #19 to be cognitively intact without behaviors. An initial allegation report was received by the State Agency from the facility's former Director of Nursing (DON) #2 on 8/29/25 at 4:15 PM. The report read that the facility initially became aware of the incident on 8/29/25 at 4:00 PM and alleged notification that Nurse #1 received a truck bed from Resident #19 with a BIMS of 12 (this score of 12 indicates the resident was cognitively intact). Resident's contact person notified staff that Nurse #1 was not supposed to receive the truck bed or any other of the items in her possession. Police were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately in the areas of accidents (Resident #11), and medications (Residents #49 and #21). This was for 3 of 24 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. The findings included: 1. Resident #11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included history of a stroke and muscle weakness. A review of Resident #11's medical record revealed he had a fall on 12/13/25 with a minor injury of a skin tear to his right arm. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #11 had severely impaired cognition. He was coded with one fall with no injury since the previous assessment. On 2/17/26 at 3:03 PM, an interview occurred with the MDS Consultant who had coded the 12/17/25 quarterly MDS assessment. She reviewed the MDS assessment dated [DATE] as well as Resident #11's medical record and confirmed Resident #11 had a fall on 12/13/25 that resulted in a skin tear to his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, Medical Wound Provider and staff interviews, the facility failed to assess a newly identified pressure ulcer that included the pressure ulcer stage, characteristics, and presence of pain and failed to complete pressure ulcer treatments as ordered 3 out of 5 days. This was for 1 of 5 (Resident #2) residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care.The findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included recent left above the knee amputation and history of a stroke. An admission progress note dated 12/3/25, completed by Nurse #9, indicated Resident #2 had a surgical wound to the left thigh with 35 staples present. Her right foot was dry and cracked. Discoloration and scarring were present to the right leg, bruising was present to the right ankle, and her buttocks were free from any skin breakdown. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 had moderately impaired cognition. She required maximum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0742 — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews with staff and Medical Director, the facility failed to provide behavioral healthcare services to a resident with diagnosed mental health disorders and behavioral symptoms for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #21) reviewed for behavioral and emotional needs.The findings included:A review of Resident #21's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed he was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 01/23/26 with discharge diagnosis that included bipolar I disorder-manic. His hospital course included psychiatry was consulted for Extrapyramidal Symptoms (EPS) (involuntary movements such as tremors, rigidity, and restlessness) agitation, and acute mania. Resident #21's discharge summary also included the following:Follow up appointments: Please make sure to follow up with Psychiatric appointments and medication management. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included bipolar I disorder, current manic with psychotic features and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, Medical Director and staff interviews, the facility failed to hold a blood pressure medication as ordered by the physician for 1 of 6 residents whose medications were reviewed (Resident #49) for unnecessary medication.The findings included: Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension and heart failure. Review of Resident #49's physician orders included an order dated 9/6/24 for Metoprolol Tartrate (a medication for high blood pressure) 25 milligrams (mg). Give 12.5 mg by mouth every 12 hours. Hold if systolic blood pressure (SBP-the top number in the blood pressure reading) is less than 110. The January 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed and revealed Resident #49 had received Metoprolol Tartrate, despite the SBP being below 110 on the following dates:1/3/26 for 9:00 PM dose, SBP was 109 administered by Nurse #5.1/9/26 for 9:00 PM dose, SBP was 109 administered by Medication Aide (MA) #1.1/10/26 for 9:00 PM dose, SBP…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,642 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,642 — penalty dated 2024-08-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVARDIS HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $387K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC