Jamestown Health and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 238 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 83.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 86 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 83.9 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2022-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to mitigate a fall hazard for 1 Resident (Resident #135) and failed to utilize a mechanical lift during a transfer from the wheelchair to the bed for 1 resident (Resident #32) in a sample of 33 Residents, resulting in harm for both Residents. The findings included: 1) Resident #135 fell while left alone in the shower room on 2-4-22 at 5:45 a.m., resulting in a fractured upper femur (hip area). This is harm. Resident #135 was sent out to the emergency room on 2-4-22 after the fall and fracture, and returned on 2-14-22 after a 10 day stay. The fractured hip was deemed inoperable at the hospital, and the Resident was sent back to the facility for convalescence. The Resident was no longer in the facility at the time of survey, and so a closed record review was conducted. The Resident's MDS assessment revealed that the Resident required extensive assistance, or was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to 1 Residents, (# 240) in a survey sample of 25 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #240 the facility staff failed to provide the IV Antibiotic ordered on admission, causing the Resident to miss 4 consecutive doses of antibiotic therapy, the facility also failed to provide the Latanoprost eye drops for glaucoma instead having family bring in personal supply to use. On 4/23/24 at 1:25 PM Resident #240 was observed sitting up in wheelchair with his lunch tray in front of him. His IV pole sat near bed with empty iv bag/antibiotic hanging from it. Since Resident #240 was a new admission, he was questioned about his admission process. Resident #240 stated that when he arrived at the facility They didn't have my medicines. When asked to elaborate on that he stated Well I came here, and I missed a few doses of my IV antibiotic because they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed ensure Residents were free from significant medication errors for 2 Residents in a survey sample of 25 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #240 the facility staff failed to administer medications as ordered by physician causing the Resident to miss 4 consecutive doses of antibiotics. On 4/23/24 a review of the clinical record revealed that Resident #240 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to, Acute Hematogenous Osteomyelitis Left ankle and foot with recent surgery for 5th metatarsal head resection, type 2 diabetes mellitus with CKD (Chronic Kidney Disease) Stage 3A, asthma, glaucoma, systolic and diastolic CHF (Congestive Heart Failure), hypertension, chronic atrial fibrillation, anemia in CKD, obstructive and reflux uropathy, gout, and history of CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident) with deficits. A review of the orders revealed that Resident #240…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation, it was found that the facility staff failed to provide drinks, other than water, consistent with the needs and preferences of one resident in a survey sample of 25 residents. The findings included: For Resident #240, the facility staff failed to provide decaf coffee and tea as the resident has health concerns related to caffeine consumption. On April 23, 2024, at 1:25 PM, Resident #240 was observed in his room, sitting up in his wheelchair with his overbed table in front of him, and his lunch tray was on the overbed table. Resident #240, a new admission, was asked about the admission process. He mentioned encountering a couple of issues, stating, When I was admitted , I was supposed to have a diabetic or heart-healthy diet. I was given a regular diet until Monday (4/22/24), and I am not supposed to have caffeine due to my health conditions. I would like to have coffee and tea, but I need decaf. When questioned if someone from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a therapeutic diet as ordered by the physician for 1 Resident (#240) in a survey sample of 25 residents. The findings included: For Resident #240, the facility did not implement the heart-healthy or diabetic diet as ordered by the physician upon admission. On April 23, 2024, at 1:25 PM, Resident #240 was observed in his room sitting up in his wheelchair with his overbed table in front of him, and his lunch tray was on the overbed table. Resident #240, a new admission, mentioned encountering issues with the admission process. He stated, When I was admitted , I was supposed to have a diabetic or heart-healthy diet. I was given a regular diet until Monday (4/22/24), and I am not supposed to have caffeine due to my health conditions. I would like to have coffee and tea, but I need decaf. When asked if someone from the dietary department met with him during admission to discuss…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation, it was found that the facility staff failed to ensure residents were provided with necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for one resident in a survey sample of 25 residents. The findings included: For Resident #190, the facility failed to provide timely incontinent care for a resident with dementia and incontinence. On April 22, 2024, at approximately 2:00 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #190's representative, who stated that on July 1, 2023, Resident #190 was found sitting in her wheelchair and was obviously wet and smelled of feces. The representative stated it was evident she had not been changed for a long time. When she complained to staff, she was told, Lunch trays have to be picked up first before we can make rounds to change people. Although interviews with current residents revealed that things are getting better, a review of the grievance log and the Resident Council minutes reflected that during that time frame (June-July 2023), there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that pain management services were provided to residents who required such services, specifically for Resident #190, within a survey sample of 25 residents. The findings included: For Resident #190, the facility staff failed to implement physician orders regarding pain medication / pain management. Resident #190 was admitted on [DATE], with various diagnoses including CKD (Chronic Kidney Disease), DJD (degenerative joint disease) status post right total knee replacement, dementia, depression, anxiety, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), restless leg syndrome, hearing loss, history of breast cancer, history of uterine cancer, and history of scoliosis with spinal fusion. On April 23, 2024, a review of the clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with orders that included, among others: - Tramadol HCl Oral Tablet 50 MG: Give 0.5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-05-12 · tag F0577 — pattern
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, Resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to post survey results in a place readily accessible to Residents. The findings included: On 05/11/2022 at approximately 10:30 A.M., a resident Council meeting was conducted. There were six residents in attendance. When the group was asked if they knew where the survey results were located, all of the residents in the meeting indicated they did not know where the survey results were located. On 05/11/2022 11:04 A.M., the binder containing the survey results was observed in a glasstop display table in the front lobby. The glass top display was situated in the corner with a chair and a side table on each side. There was approximately 18 clearance to approach the glass top display table which is not wheelchair accessible. Also, the glass top display table had a heavy, glass frame positioned on the top making it difficult to open. The Health survey and Emergency Preparedness survey result binders were both in the case making it difficult to lift either binder out of the display box. On 05/11/2022 at 11:09…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-05-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement their immunization policy and ensure each Resident is offered influenza and pneumococcal immunization, for 3 Residents (Resident #9, #81, and #287), in a sample of 5 Residents reviewed for immunizations. The findings included: On 5/10/22, clinical record reviews were conducted for the sampled Residents with regards to immunization for flu and pneumonia. This review revealed the following: 1. In Resident #9 electronic health record (EHR) there was no documentation with regards to the pneumonia vaccine status of Resident #9. There was evidence that Resident #9 had refused the flu vaccine for the 2020-2021 flu season. There was no evidence of her being offered the flu shot for the 2021-2022 flu season. Review of the misc. (miscellaneous) tab revealed no evidence of vaccine administration or offering of the vaccine for flu and pneumonia. Review of the Medication Administration Records (MAR) revealed no evidence of the pneumonia or flu immunization being provided to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-05-12 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
  Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to conduct routine COVID-19 testing in accordance with the CDC recommendations for 5 facility staff (RN D, CNA B, CNA D, LPN D and LPN E), who were not up-to-date with COVID vaccinations, in a survey sample of 5 staff reviewed for COVID testing. The findings included: The facility staff failed to conduct routine testing of facility staff who were not fully vaccinated for COVID-19 as per the guidance from CDC and the facility policy. On 5/10/22, during the entrance conference, the facility Administrator was provided a copy of the entrance conference worksheet and asked to submit documentation related to COVID-19 testing, to include the facility's testing plan, log of the level of community transmission, and if there were any testing issues and contact with the local and state health departments with regards to testing issues. On 5/10/22, the facility submitted an employee vaccination matrix and employee testing records for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a Resident's right to a dignified existence for 1 Resident (#24) in a survey sample of 33 Residents. For Resident #24, the facility staff failed to dress the Resident in her own clothing, and instead dressed her in a hospital gown. The Resident expressed embarrassment and requested her own clothing for appointments and anytime she was out of her room or out of the facility. The findings included; Resident #24's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment was dated 3-17-22. The document coded the Resident continent of bowel and bladder, No Cognitive impairment, and required extensive assistance from one staff member for bathing, however, with set up help could dress herself. On 5-11-22 at approximately 11:30 a.m., during Resident Council meeting, the Resident stated her clothing had been removed to the laundry 2 weeks prior and she had not received them back. After the meeting, the surveyor went to the Resident's room and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVARDIS HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $516K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA