No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Crown Haven Health and Rehabilitation

620 Tom Hunter Road, Charlotte, NC 28213 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (704) 598-5136 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)1 immediate-jeopardy citation3 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$71,235 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 3 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $71,235 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-02)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
602 W Sugar Creek Rd · (704) 649-9457 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7735 N Tryon St · (704) 547-0972 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
118 Tom Hunter Rd Ste C · (704) 595-5156 · Call to confirm hours
Park
919 Tom Hunter Rd · (980) 314-1001 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.4%15.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.5%7.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%5.9%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.6%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.5%18.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.1%21.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.4%94.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.1%5.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.2%20.7%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.4%14.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.4%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine57.1%78.1%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.291.781.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.151.801.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.7%CMS range 26.1–56.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.0–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.761.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
1.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.69
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
56.6%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 91.9 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.69 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.15 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-03)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-07-03 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff, resident, family member, Medical Director and Adult Protective Services (APS) Social Worker (SW) interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe and orderly discharge for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge (Resident #88). Resident #88 was being treated in the facility with Chlordiazepoxide HCl (a medication used to treat the symptoms of alcohol withdrawal also known as Librium) for a known history of alcohol abuse and received a dose a short time before exiting the facility on 5/18/25 at approximately 10:51 AM. The Medical Director wrote orders for Resident #88 to be monitored every shift for symptoms of alcohol withdrawal syndrome, such as tremors, shaking, anxiety, nausea, vomiting, headaches, elevated heart rate, sweating, irritability, confusion, insomnia, nightmares and high blood pressure the same day the Chlordiazepoxide HCl was initiated. Consuming alcohol while taking Chlordiazepoxide HCL could cause nausea and/or vomiting. When Resident #88 returned to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and responsible party, staff, and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to notify Resident #1's responsible party (RP) that Resident #1 had low blood sugar levels from insulin administration and the insulin was discontinued on 07/21/23. The insulin was prescribed for Person #2 (potential new admission from the same skilled nursing facility with same first and last name as Resident #1). Resident #1's RP stated if he had been notified in July about the administration of the insulin he would have asked to speak to the Administrator and the Medical Director and informed them Resident #1 did not have a diagnosis of diabetes. Had Resident's #1's RP been notified there was the high likelihood further significant medication errors would not have occurred until September. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for notification of change. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses according to his correct…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-13 · tag F0620 — isolated
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their Admissions Policy and Procedure and verify the identity of a cognitively impaired resident when he was admitted to the facility with paperwork from the discharging skilled nursing facility for Person #2 (potential new admission with same first and last name as Resident #1). As a result, Resident #1, who did not have a diagnosis of diabetes, was administered 3 doses of long-acting insulin, and experienced 3 three low blood sugar levels before the insulin was discontinued. In addition, Resident #1 received an anticoagulant, aspirin, a diuretic, and a medication used to treat hypothyroidism from 07/17/23 until 09/15/23 prescribed for Person #2. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for medication errors and had a high likelihood of serious harm (Resident #1). The findings included: The Admissions Policy and Procedure for the facility dated 08/19/2018, under Procedure read in part: The Marketing Coordinator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and family member, staff, Nurse Practitioner and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors when a. Resident #1 was administered medications prescribed for Person #2 (potential new admission with same first and last name as Resident #1). Person #2's information and medication orders were entered for Resident #1 in error on 7/17/23 and this was not discovered until 9/15/23. Resident #1 did not have a diagnosis of diabetes and was administered 3 doses of long-acting insulin and had three low blood sugar levels before the insulin was discontinued on 07/21/23. In addition, Resident #1 was administered an anticoagulant, aspirin, diuretic, and a medication used to treat hypothyroidism for which he had no diagnoses to treat. b. In addition, Resident #1 did not receive two eye drops prescribed for his diagnosis of glaucoma from 07/17/23 through 09/15/23. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for medication errors and had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2023-09-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff, family member and Wound Physician interviews, the facility failed to identify a skin impairment on a resident during weekly skin assessments for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #21). This failure resulted in Resident #21 being admitted to the hospital and requiring care in the Intensive Care Unit for severe sepsis due to a necrotic (dead tissue) heel wound and osteomyelitis (bone infection). The findings included: Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, muscle weakness, diabetes, and contractures. Review of Physician orders for Resident #21 revealed an order dated 4/4/22 for weekly skin assessments on Thursdays. Review of a Wound Physician's note dated 2/6/23 revealed that a non-pressure related wound on the residents left heel had resolved. The annual MDS for Resident #21 dated 2/8/23 revealed Resident #21 was at risk for pressure ulcers but had no pressure ulcers. The care plan for Resident #21 revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident, Medical Director and staff interviews, the facility failed to have documentation that the resident was informed in advance of the risks and benefits for the use of Chlordiazepoxide HCl (a psychotropic medication used to treat the symptoms of alcohol withdrawal) for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #88) reviewed for psychotropic medications. Findings included: Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 5/18/25 with diagnoses which included anxiety, depression, and alcohol dependence with unspecified alcohol-induced disorder. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #88 was cognitively intact. A review of a Medical Director progress note dated 5/14/25 revealed Resident #88 was seen for alcohol use. The note indicated he left the facility to consume alcohol, which was against the protocol of the facility and Resident #88 agreed on 5/14/25 to be treated within the facility for his alcohol withdrawal symptoms.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff, resident, family member, and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to allow a resident's choice regarding leave of absence (LOA) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #88) reviewed for self-determination.Findings included:Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 5/18/25 with diagnoses which included anxiety, depression, and alcohol dependence with unspecified alcohol-induced disorder. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #88 was cognitively intact and was not coded for any behaviors. Additionally, Resident #88's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed participating in his favorite activities and participating in outdoor activities were very important to him. A review of Resident #88's care plan last reviewed on 2/27/25, revealed he was non-compliant with the facility's rules on alcohol and management routinely confiscated alcohol from him. Interventions included not allowing Resident #88 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop an individualized person-centered comprehensive care plan in the areas of dialysis, Activity of Daily Living (ADL), insulin use, (Resident #23) for 1 of 20 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans.The findings included:Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of end stage renal disease, encephalopathy, and diabetes.A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #23 needed supervision to total assistance with ADL's. Resident #23 was also coded for insulin use, and dialysis. The MDS did not indicate Resident #23 exhibited any behaviors or rejection of care. The Care Area Assessment (CAA) on 4/14/25 indicated Resident #23 had a care area of ADL functional/rehab potential triggered. The CAA also indicated that Resident #23's ADL functional/rehab potential care area was addressed in the care plan.A review of Resident #23's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to transcribe an order of lorazepam gel (a medication used to treat anxiety) from the hospital discharge record to the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #23. Additionally, the failed to report a low heart rate of 46 (normal heart rate is 60 to 100 beats per min) to the medical provider prior to surveyor stopping Nurse #9 from administering Metoprolol (medication that lowers heart rate and blood pressure) to Resident #41. The facility also failed to follow an order to remove a lidocaine (topical pain medication) patch at bedtime for Resident #79. This was for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for professional standards of practice.The findings included: 1. A review of Resident #23’s hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] listed lorazepam gel .5mg/ml to be applied to the neck or wrist topically every 24 hours as needed. Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of end stage renal disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to implement the smoking policy for storage of smoking supplies (cigarettes/lighter) for 2 of 3 residents sampled for supervision to prevent accidents (Resident #85 and Resident #13). The findings included: A review of the facility's undated Smoking Agreement, undated Smoke Break Rules and undated Designated Smoking Times documents, indicated that smoking materials and incendiary devices (something that is capable of causing a fire or designed to start a fire) would at no time be stored in the residents' rooms. Smoking materials would be secured by the facility including lighters, cigarettes and e-cigarettes. The policy indicated that all residents who smoked would be evaluated for smoking safety upon admission, quarterly, at the time of a change in condition or if staff had a concern that re-evaluation was necessary. 1. Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included nicotine dependence.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy in the areas of investigating, and protection following an allegation of sexual assault. A thorough investigation was not conducted, and protection was not implemented to prevent further potential abuse. This deficient practice was for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for abuse. Findings included: A review of the facility's abuse policy entitled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation, last revised 11/16/22 revealed the Abuse Coordinator (Executive Director) or his/her designee would investigate all reports of allegations of abuse, neglect, misappropriation and exploitation. The Abuse Coordinator and/or Director of Nursing would take statements from the victim and suspects and all possible witnesses including all other employees in the vicinity of the alleged abuse. He/she would secure all physical evidence. Upon completion of the investigation, a detailed report would be prepared. For…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to don appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) before entering residents' room under transmission-based precautions for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for infection control (Resident #1). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) dated 09/01/2022 revealed the EBP will be implemented for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. EBP employs gown and glove use during high resident care activities such as: Dressing Bathing/Showering, Transferring, Changing Linens, Providing Hygiene, Changing briefs or assisting with toileting, Device Care or use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube and tracheostomy, Wound Care: any skin opening requiring a dressing. On 09/17/24 at 10:32 AM an observation was made of Nurse Aide #1 entering Resident #1's room to provide a bed bath, dress and assist Resident #1 into her wheelchair for the day. Resident #1 was under EBP for a feeding tube and carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff and Resident interviews the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #8). Resident #8 reported Resident #7 slapped Resident #8's face with his open hand, continued slapping at her face multiple times and hit her like a girl while yelling at her when Resident #7 exited the smoking courtyard and Resident #8 entered. The findings included: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with essential primary hypertension, and fracture of unspecified part of neck of neck femur. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 was cognitively intact and required set up to extensive assistance from staff for her activities of daily living and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus, acute kidney failure, and schizophrenia. Review of Resident #7's Discharge, Return…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy in the areas of reporting, investigating, and protection following an allegation of resident to resident abuse. The allegation was not reported to the state or Adult Protective Services (APS), an investigation was not conducted, and protection was not implemented to prevent further potential abuse. This deficient practice was for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for abuse. Findings included: A review of the facility's abuse policy entitled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation, last revised 11/16/22 revealed the Abuse Coordinator (Executive Director) or his/her designee would investigate all reports of allegations of abuse, neglect, misappropriation and exploitation. The Abuse Coordinator and/or Director of Nursing would take statements from the victim and suspects and all possible witnesses including all other employees in the vicinity of the alleged abuse. He/she would secure all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide incontinence care when Resident #2 requested incontinence care before attending an activity. This failure caused Resident #2 to miss the activity when she remained in her room in a soiled and wet brief. This made the Resident feel very upset, angry and cry. This occurred for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The findings included: The admission date for Resident #2 to the facility was 11/6/15. The 8/2/23 annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment recorded it was very important to Resident #2 to attend her favorite activities. Resident #2's care plan, revised November 2023 indicated bowel and bladder incontinence and depressive episodes. The care plan recorded that Resident #2 may exaggerate events, make false claims and allegations at times. Interventions included encouraging effective communication, checking for incontinence, providing peri-care after each incontinent episode,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a clean homelike environment when they failed to clean tube feeding formula off the feeding tube pole and floor in 1 of 3 resident rooms that had tube feeding formula (room [ROOM NUMBER]). The findings included: An observation was made of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 07/01/24 at 11:06 AM. There was a feeding tube pump hanging from a pole beside the bed. The pole and floor were observed to have dried light brown substances that appeared to be tube feeding formula. The dried formula covered the pole, the bottle of the pole, and the floor under the pole. An observation was made of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 07/01/24 at 12:35 PM. There was a feeding tube pump hanging from a pole beside the bed. The pole and floor were observed to have dried light brown substances that appeared to be tube feeding formula. The dried formula covered the pole, the bottle of the pole, and the floor under the pole. An observation was made of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 07/01/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, resident interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide incontinence care when requested to 1 of 2 dependent residents (Resident #2) reviewed for activities of daily living. The findings included: The admission date for Resident #2 to the facility was 11/6/15 with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, overactive bladder, urgency of urination, and urgency incontinence. The 8/2/23 annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment recorded it was very important to Resident #2 to attend her favorite activities. The care plan, revised November 2023 indicated Resident #2 had bowel and bladder incontinence and depressive episodes related to immobility, and a neurogenic disorder. The care plan recorded that she may exaggerate events, make false claims and allegations at times. Interventions included encouraging effective communication, checking for incontinence, providing peri-care after each incontinent episode, modifying daily schedule to accommodate community life participation as requested by the resident and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff, and Medical Director interviews the facility failed to administer tube feedings via a gastrostomy tube as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed with tube feeding orders (Resident #3). The findings included: Resident #3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included gastrostomy status and sequelae of cerebral infarction. A physician order dated 05/05/24 read, tube feeding formula continuous at 65 milliliters (ml) per hour via gastrostomy tube. Flush gastrostomy tube with 100 ml of water every four hours. An observation was made of Resident #3 on 07/01/24 at 11:06 AM. Resident #3 was resting in bed with his head of bed elevated. There was a feeding tube pump hanging from a pole beside Resident #3's bed. There was no tube feeding formula hanging from the pole at the time. There was a bottle of tube feeding formula unopened sitting on Resident #3's counter in his room at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff, and Medical Director interviews the facility failed to change the dressing to a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line or an intravenous line) as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 residents receiving intravenous medication (Resident #3). The finding included: Resident #3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis of pressure ulcer and an abscess. Review of a hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #3 had a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line inserted at the hospital on [DATE] at 3:46 PM. A physician order dated 06/20/24 read, intravenous (IV) catheter care instructions, inspect and clean right upper extremity and apply a clear dressing every Thursday on day shift. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated June 2023 revealed that on June 20, 2024, and June 27, 2024, Nurse #2 initialed the MAR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure that a tracheostomy (surgical airway in the front of the neck) dependent residents' oxygen was delivered at the prescribed rate, failed to clean the oxygen concentrator and oxygen concentrator filter for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory services (Resident #3). The findings included: Resident #3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure status post tracheostomy. A quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated Resident #3 was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision making, had no shortness of breath, received oxygen therapy, and tracheostomy care during the assessment reference period. A physician order dated 06/28/24 read 4 liters of oxygen via tracheostomy collar continuous. Further review of physician orders revealed no order for cleaning of oxygen filters or oxygen concentrator. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain a complete an accurate medical record when Nurse #2 documented that she changed a peripherally inserted central catheter line (intravenous line) dressing on two occasions when the dressing was not changed as ordered for 1 of 1 residents reviewed who required intravenous medications (Resident #3). The findings included: A physician order dated 06/20/24 read, intravenous (IV) catheter care instructions, inspect and clean right upper extremity and apply a clear dressing every Thursday on day shift. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated June 2023 revealed that on June 20, 2024, and June 27, 2024, Nurse #2 initialed the MAR indicating that she had cleaned and inspected Resident #3's right upper extremity and applied a clean clear dressing to the PICC line. An observation was made of Resident #3 on 07/01/24 at 11:06 AM. Resident #3 was resting in bed with his head of bed elevated. He was noted to have a PICC line in his right upper extremity that was covered with a clear dressing. The dressing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on an observation, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to wash dishes in hot water and sanitize dishes per manufacturer recommendations in a quaternary sanitizing solution of at least 100 parts per million (ppm). This had the potential to affect 89 of 89 residents. The findings included: An observation of the Dietary Manager (DM) washing dishes (pots, sheet pans, whisks) in a three-compartment sink occurred on 02/08/24 at 12:15 PM. The water in the wash sink was cold to touch. The concentration of the quaternary sanitizing solution was less than 50 parts per million (ppm). The water in the sanitizing sink was above the WATER FILL LINE. Per manufacturer recommendations the concentration of quaternary sanitizing solution should be at least 100 ppm. The DM stated on 02/08/24 during the observation that she set up the three-compartment sink earlier that morning to wash the dishes from the breakfast meal, and that she checked the quaternary sanitizing solution which registered above 100 ppm at the time. The DM stated that she did not recall what time she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions that the committee put into place following the recertification and complaint investigation survey of 8/31/21, the complaint investigation survey completed on 1/19/22, the recertification and complaint investigation survey completed on 7/15/22, and the complaint investigation survey completed on 5/25/23. This failure occurred for four repeat deficiencies cited for resident, family, group and response, accuracy of assessments, food procurement, and increase, prevent decrease in range of motion and mobility that was subsequently recited on the current recertification and complaint investigation survey of 2/12/24. The continued failure of the facility during five federal surveys of record shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAA Program. The findings included: This tag is cross referenced to:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-12 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interviews and staff interviews the facility failed to provide updates or resolutions to group grievances (evening snacks, better meal choices, transportation to outings, and cold food) that were brought to Resident Council meetings for 4 of 4 months reviewed (October, November, December of 2023 and January 2024). The findings included: A review of Resident Council meeting minutes from October 2023 through January 2024 was completed. Each month's meeting minutes had an Old Business and a New Business section. Residents brought the following concerns to Resident Council: Review of the October 2023 minutes revealed under Old Business1. Residents would like a bigger bus for outings 2. Residents would like better meal choices such as soup, salads, and fresh fruit. The November 2023 Resident Council minutes noted, New Business 1. Residents would like a bigger bus for outings 2. Residents would like better meal choices such as soup, salads, desserts, and fresh fruit. Under Old Business 1. Residents would like a bigger bus for outings so that more residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to record opening date for 1 opened vial in 1 of 5 medication cart (100 Hall medication cart), failed to remove expired medication in accordance with the manufacturer's expiration date for 1 of 5 medication cart (100 Hall medication cart), and failed to store drugs in clean and sanitary environment for 1 of 2 medication room refrigerators (north side medication room refrigerator) during medication storage checks. Findings included: a. A medication storage audit was conducted on 2/6/24 at 1:42 pm in the presence of Nurse #6. The following medications were found in 100 Hall medication cart: 1. An opened vial of Lidocaine Hydrochloride 1% 10 milligrams per milliliters (an anesthetic agent that induced insensitivity to pain) without an opening date. 2. An opened bottle of multivitamin containing 174 tablets expired on 10/2023. During an interview on 2/6/24 at 1:42 pm, Nurse #6 confirmed that the multivitamin bottle was the only bottle of its kind in her medication cart. She revealed that she administered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on an observation of the lunch meal tray line, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the correct portion size of pureed food and large portions according to the planned menu for 1 of 1 meal observations. This practice had the potential to affect 2 residents on pureed diets and 12 residents who received large portions. The findings included: During a continuous observation of the lunch meal tray line on 02/08/24 from 12:11 PM until 12:35 PM, cook #1 plated pureed black-eyed peas and pureed chicken with a 2-ounce serving utensil. Additionally, [NAME] #1 plated a four-ounce serving of stewed tomatoes for a large portion. Review of the menu revealed the following portions were to be served on 02/08/24 for the lunch meal: - Pureed black-eyed peas - 4-ounce serving. - Pureed chicken - 4-ounce serving. - Large portion - one and one third serving. An interview with [NAME] #1 occurred on 02/08/24 at 12:37 PM. [NAME] #1 stated that she used the menu to know the portion of foods to serve, but sometimes the correct serving utensil was not available. [NAME] #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-12 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to offer and deliver evening snacks to 10 of 12 residents (#78, #6, #69, #84, #60, #81, #34, #7, #25, #27) reviewed for evening snacks. The findings included: During an interview on 2/8/24 at 3:33 PM the Dietary Manager revealed she responded to resident council grievance in September 2023 by adding more evening snacks each night and nursing staff would sign off on receiving the snacks. A review of the December 2023 Resident Council Minutes revealed under New Business, Residents were still not receiving snacks at night and under Old Business, Residents would like to have snacks at night. A review of the January 2024 Resident Council Minutes revealed under, New Business, Residents were still not receiving snacks at night and under Old Business, Residents would like to have snacks at night. During an interview on 2/6/24 at 2:21 PM the Activities Director indicated she completed resident council grievances and passed them onto the Social Worker who assigned the grievances to department heads. If she did not receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews the facility failed to administer the Influenza vaccination ( Resident #63) and failed to offer and administer the Pneumococcal vaccination (Resident #15, Resident #59 and Resident #68) to 4 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. The findings included: 1. Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #63's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident did not receive the Influenza vaccine in the facility for the year's Influenza season and the Influenza vaccine was not offered. A review of Resident #63's electronic medical record revealed the consent to administer the Influenza vaccination was given by the responsible party on 11/28/23 but there was no record that the Influenza vaccine was given to Resident #63. An interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP) on 02/07/24 at 10:29 AM who reviewed the Resident #63's medical record and stated that she was not sure why the Resident did not receive the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Gradual Dose Reduction for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #15 and Resident #20) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety, depression, dementia and psychotic disorder. A review of Resident #15's physician orders dated 09/23/21 for Seroquel 100 milligrams (mg) (an antipsychotic medication used to treat symptoms of psychosis) by mouth twice a day and 06/12/22 for Seroquel XR Extended Release 50 mg by mouth once a day in the afternoon. A review of Resident #15's Psychiatry progress note dated 09/13/23 indicated to continue the current medications as prescribed at the current doses as any reduction attempted may cause decompensation of the resident. A review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident received an antipsychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement nutrition care plan interventions to monitor and document food/fluid intake at each meal for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition care plans (Resident #142 and Resident #80). The findings included: 1a. Resident #80 was admitted to the facility 8/22/23. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, protein calorie malnutrition, hyperkalemia, end stage renal disease with hemodialysis, and anemia, among others. A nutrition care plan initiated 9/1/23 identified Resident #80 had potential for nutritional problems due to a therapeutic diet and 32-ounce fluid restriction. Interventions included for nursing staff to monitor food/fluid intake and record intake at each meal. A quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] assessed Resident #80 with intact cognition, required set up/clean up assistance with meals and no weight loss or weight gain. A review of the electronic medical record revealed food intake was not recorded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, a family interview, interviews with the Physician, Nurse Practitioners and staff, the facility failed to obtain a STAT (immediately) chest X-Ray, transcribe an as needed order for Tylenol in response to a fever, follow a recommendation to monitor vital signs, and provide STAT lab results to the Nurse Practitioner for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident #142). The findings included: Resident #142 was admitted to the facility 11/15/23 and transferred to the hospital on [DATE] at the request of the family. Diagnoses included osteoarthritis knee pain, anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, essential hypertension, and atrial tachycardia (increased heart rate), among others. A care plan initiated 11/17/23 identified Resident #142 used medications that required monitoring. Interventions included nursing to report important lab results to the MD. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #142 with adequate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to reschedule and transport a resident to a consultation with an eye doctor for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for vision services (Resident #28). The findings included: Resident #28 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses inclusive of acute respiratory failure and peripheral vascular disease. A quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #28 was cognitively intact, had impaired vision, was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, dressing, chair to bed transfers and toilet; and required maximum assistance with personal hygiene, transfers to shower, and bed mobility. A physician's order dated 1/2/23 indicated Resident #28 had an active order for cataract surgery consult per patient request. A progress note dated 10/27/23 and written by Unit Manager #2 indicated the facility was unable to transfer Resident to eye appointment and that the appointment would be rescheduled once a method of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to identify and develop a treatment plan for a resident with a right-hand contracture. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #63) reviewed for range of motion. The finding included: Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral vascular accident (CVA), spastic hemiplegia affecting the right dominate side and aphasia. Review of Resident #63's care plan dated 07/23/23 revealed the Resident had a self-care deficit in his activities of daily living (ADL) related to a history of a CVA with right sided hemiplegia, limited mobility and range of motion. The goal that Resident #63 would receive the assistance he needed for his ADL, and he would maintain his current level of functioning would be attained by anticipating his needs and providing assistance for ADL. The Resident was not care planned for a specific intervention for his right hand. The quarterly Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a smoking materials were secured by staff in accordance with their smoking policy for 1 of 3 residents observed for supervision to prevent accidents (Resident #18). Findings included: The facility's smoking policy dated 2/7/20 stated the center will retain and store matches, lighters, etc. for all residents. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cardiovascular accident and dementia. Resident #18's Quarterly Minimum Data Set on 1/5/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact, had clear speech and easily understood others. She had a functional limitation in range of motion on one side of her upper and lower extremity and used a wheelchair for mobility. Resident #18's smoking evaluation dated 1/12/24 indicated the resident was a safe smoker and may smoke in designated areas without supervision. On 2/5/24 10:39 am, Resident #18 was observed self-propelling herself via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, staff and Resident interviews, the facility failed to secure a urinary catheter tubing to prevent tension or trauma for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for urinary catheter. The finding included: Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included neurogenic bladder. Resident #28's care plan dated 04/07/22 indicated the Resident had an indwelling urinary catheter and the goal to remain free from catheter related trauma would be attainted by interventions including keeping the catheter below the bladder and monitoring for signs of discomfort, pain and urinary tract infections. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #28 was cognitively intact and had an indwelling urinary catheter. A review of Resident #28's physician orders revealed: *01/15/24 Urinary Catheter #20 French with a 30 milliliters (ml) balloon. A review of Resident #28's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 02/2024 indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to serve a prescribed double portion protein therapeutic diet to Resident #80, a Resident at risk for nutritional decline, for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for physician ordered therapeutic diets. The findings included: Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, stage IV (ESRD), anemia in chronic kidney disease, dependence on renal dialysis, elevation of levels of liver transaminase levels, and protein calorie malnutrition, among others. A Care Area assessment dated [DATE] recorded Resident #80 was at potential nutritional risk regarding the requirement of a therapeutic diet for ESRD management. A diet order for Resident #80 dated 8/25/23 recorded a (brand name) high protein shake twice daily (BID) for additional calories and ESRD, 8 ounces BID. A diet order for Resident #80 dated 9/6/23 recorded a renal diet, regular texture regular/thin liquids consistency, fluid restriction per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions the committee put in place following a recertification and complaint survey dated 08/31/21. The area of infection control and prevention was originally cited during a recertification and complaint survey dated 08/31/21. The area was subsequently recited during the onsite revisit and complaint survey dated 12/13/23. The continued failure of the facility during two federal surveys of record shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAA program. The findings included: The tag is cross referenced to: F880- Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their hand hygiene policy as part of their infection control policy when the Treatment Nurse did not perform hand hygiene prior to beginning treatments, or prior to donning gloves to remove soiled coverings with drainage from several wounds on a resident's (Resident #9) left leg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their hand hygiene policy as part of their infection control policy when the Treatment Nurse did not perform hand hygiene prior to beginning treatments, or prior to donning gloves to remove soiled coverings with drainage from several wounds on a resident's (Resident #9) left leg and foot wound, and right inner thigh wound. The Treatment Nurse doffed her gloves after removing the coverings and donned new gloves without sanitizing her hands and proceeded to apply the treatment to the wounds and covered them with border gauze dressings. This occurred for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for wound care. The findings included: The facility's policy entitled Hand Hygiene which is part of their Infection Control Policies and Procedures last revised on 02/05/21 under Process read in part: Hand hygiene should be performed: Before initiating a clean procedure Before and after patient care After contact with blood, body fluids, or excretions, mucous membranes, non-intact skin, or wound dressings After glove…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to apply bilateral lower leg splints for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for contractures/limited range of motion (Resident #5). Findings included: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility 7/15/2019 with diagnoses to include a progressive neurological disorder. A physical therapy discharge note dated 3/30/2022 documented that physical therapy had provided services to reduce pain and joint stiffness and to increase range of motion of Resident #5's bilateral knees. The discharge note documented that Resident #5 showed improvement of the range of motion of both knees and Resident #5 was able to tolerate wearing splints for 6 hours at a time. The note documented a nursing assistant had been instructed how to apply the splints with instructions for Resident #5 to wear the splints for up to 6 hours or as tolerated. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #5 to be cognitively intact and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a medication administration error rate of less than 5% as evidenced by a medication error rate of 22.22% (7 out of 27 opportunities) (Resident #66). Findings included: 1. Review of the facility policy Medication administration via enteral tube dated 11/30/2014 and revised on 3/6/2019 specified finely crush each medication with a pill crusher, or open capsule and pour powder into a medication cup with 5-15 milliliters (ml) of water and dissolve . there should be one medication per cup. Do not mix medications unless there is a specific physician order to do so . pour at least 15 ml of water into the syringe and allow to drain into the tube prior to medication administration. Pour one liquefied mediation in the syringe and allow gravity to drain each medication, follow each medication with at least 15 ml of water to flush the tube. A. An observation of medication administration was conducted on 7/14/2022 at 9:12 AM. Nurse #1 removed Resident #66's medications from the medication cart and placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide the resident with a care planning conference to participate with the interdisciplinary team in the development of a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #42) reviewed for care plans. The findings included: Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses which included: diabetes, hypertension, and neurogenic bladder. Review of Resident #42's 5/23/22 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed resident was cognitively intact and required limited assist with Activities of Daily living (ADL). Review of Resident #42's care plan revealed it had been updated on 5/23/22. Interview with Resident #42 on 7/11/22 at 12:31 PM revealed that she had not been invited to participate in a care plan meeting. Resident #42 further stated it had been a long time since she had attended a care plan meeting. There was no evidence in the medical record that Resident #42 was invited to a care plan meeting in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to check residual prior to administering gastrostomy tube (G-tube) medication and failed to flush the G-tube before medication administration for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for G-tube medication administration (Resident #66). Findings included: Resident #66 was admitted to the facility 6/10/2022 with diagnoses to include dysphagia, gastrostomy, and epilepsy. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #66 to be rarely or never understood and severely cognitively impaired. The MDS documented Resident #66 received more than 51% of her calories per day by G-tube. A physician order for Resident #66 dated 7/13/2022 ordered enteral feed by bolus 4 times per day with 100 milliliters (ml) flush of sterile water before and after the bolus feeding. An observation of medication administration was conducted on 7/14/2022 at 9:12 AM. Nurse #1 mixed approximately 50 ml of sterile water with the crushed medications in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a call light was functioning for 1 of 6 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) on 1 of 4 halls. The findings included: An observation on 07/11/22 at 11:39 AM revealed call light was activated and the light inside of the room [ROOM NUMBER] was on. Observation further revealed the light outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] was not illuminated. Further observation revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] was not illuminated at the nurse's station call light panel and was occupied by Resident #44. Resident #44 was interviewed at the time of the observation and he indicated there were no concerns with his call light functioning properly. In an interview on 07/11/22 at 11:42 AM Nurse #1 stated when the resident pressed the call light in the room it would light up outside of the door and at the nurses' station call light panel. She further revealed there were no call lights activated at the doors on the 500 hall at this time. She stated there were also no lights…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-07-15 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately record the weight on a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for MDS accuracy (Resident #31). Findings included: Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #31's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] noted a weight of 297 pounds. On 5/7/22 Resident 31's weight was documented as 284.3 pounds in the medical record. During an interview with the MDS Coordinator on 7/13/22 at 11:33AM she explained the Registered Dietician (RD) completed the weight section of the MDS. She revealed Resident #31's weight documented on 5/7/22 was correct, and the MDS was inaccurate. An interview on 7/14/22 at 11:58 AM with the RD was conducted. She explained Resident 31's weight had been prepopulated on the assessment and should have been noted as 284 pounds, not 297 pounds. During an interview with the Administrator on 7/13/22 at 12:12 PM, he stated that the MDS assessments…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$71,235 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $55,966 — penalty dated 2024-07-02
  • $3,911 — penalty dated 2023-12-13
  • $3,912 — penalty dated 2023-12-13
  • $7,446 — penalty dated 2023-12-13
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-02 for 20 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVARDIS HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.2+1.8 vs chain
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Ashland Nursing And RehabilitationAshland, VA 1 of 5Augusta Nursing and RehabilitationFishersville, VA 1 of 5Biltmore Haven Nursing and RehabilitationArden, NC 1 of 5Courtyard Health And RehabilitationMcComb, MS 1 of 5Emerald Ridge Health and RehabilitationAsheville, NC 1 of 5Ghent Health and RehabilitationNorfolk, VA 1 of 5Grand Trace Health And RehabilitationNatchez, MS 1 of 5Hibriten Mountain Nursing and RehabilitationLenoir, NC 1 of 5Highfield Nursing and RehabilitationCary, NC 1 of 5Kings Daughters Community Health & RehabStaunton, VA 1 of 5Middleton Oaks Health And RehabilitationWinona, MS 1 of 5Newport News Nursing & RehabNewport News, VA 1 of 5Pennknoll VillageEverett, PA 1 of 5The Oaks Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMeridian, MS 1 of 5Wellington Rehabilitation and HealthcareKnightdale, NC 1 of 5Westwood Health and RehabilitationArchdale, NC 1 of 5Woodstock Valley Health and RehabilitationWoodstock, VA 2 of 5Clay County Health and RehabilitationHayesville, NC 2 of 5Kannapolis Health and RehabilitationKannapolis, NC 2 of 5Manor At Penn Village, TheSelinsgrove, PA 2 of 5Manor At St Luke Village,theHazleton, PA 2 of 5Pavilion At St Luke Village, TheHazleton, PA 2 of 5Pheasant Ridge Nursing and RehabilitationRoanoke, VA 2 of 5Valley View Care and RehabilitationAndrews, NC 2 of 5Walnut Cove Health and RehabilitationWalnut Cove, NC 2 of 5Wilora Lake HealthcareCharlotte, NC 2 of 5Windsor Grove Health and RehabilitationWindsor, VA 3 of 5Forrest Oakes HealthcareAlbemarle, NC 3 of 5Hilltop Manor Health And Rehabilitation CenterUnion, MS 3 of 5Locust Grove Retirement VillageMifflin, PA 3 of 5Skyline Nursing & RehabilitationFloyd, VA 4 of 5Jamestown Health and RehabilitationWilliamsburg, VA 4 of 5Oak Grove HealthcareRutherfordton, NC 4 of 5Willowbrook Rehabilitation and CareYadkinville, NC 5 of 5Cardinal Healthcare and RehabilitationLincolnton, NC 5 of 5Grayson Health and RehabilitationIndependence, VANot rated (Special Focus)Starkville Manor Health Care And Rehabilitation CeStarkville, MS

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LOTTENC PARENTCO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2025
NCOP HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2025
NU C II IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2025
NU C IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2025
SNF CARE CENTERS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2025
STH HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2025
ZENITH HOLDCO II LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2025
ZENITH HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2025
HOBACK, TIFFANYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
SEMONES, BRANDIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
SNF MGR LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
CHAIK-OUGHLI, MAHERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
GHANNAM, WASEEMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
JONES, TEQUILLAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
RAINEY, MARNITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$565K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 88%Medicare 2%Other / private 9%

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $565K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$276per resident / day
operating cost
$8,383per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$301per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in North Carolina
$9,733/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,798/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,496/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345388. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next