Emerald Ridge Health and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 38.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 89.7 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-04-09 · tag F0742 — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff, power of attorney (POA), Nurse Practitioners, Psychiatrist and Medical Director, the facility failed to ensure Resident #101, who was admitted on [DATE] following a stay at an inpatient psychiatric facility beginning on 1/9/26 for a severe episode of recurrent major depressive disorder with suicidal behavior with attempted self-injury, received the necessary treatment that was person-centered and individualized to meet her needs. The resident's psychiatric diagnoses included major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bipolar disorder, and delusional disorders. The inpatient psychiatric facility's discharge summary included an order for antipsychotic medication (olanzapine) every night at bedtime. This order was inaccurately transcribed as a PRN (as needed) order and was administered once during the resident's stay at the facility. The Psychiatrist from the inpatient psychiatric facility indicated that olanzapine did not work as a PRN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-03-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and staff and Wound Care Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility failed to assess for and identify a pressure ulcer on the buttock before it was assessed as a stage III (full-thickness loss of skin) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings included: The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] indicated Resident #10 was admitted to the hospital with a left femur fracture and had a surgical procedure to repair her left femur fracture on 2/4/25. The discharge summary reported an x-ray was completed on 2/4/25 that showed a humerus fracture. The discharge summary indicated she had surgical incisions to her left lower extremity. The discharge summary did not mention any other wounds or skin abnormalities. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: unspecified fracture of shaft of left femur, unspecified fracture of upper end of left humerus, and impaired mobility. The admission nursing assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to resolve and communicate the facility's efforts to address concerns voiced by residents during Resident Council meetings for 11 of 12 months reviewed (April 2025, May 2025, June 2025, July 2025, August 2025, September 2025, October 2025, November 2025, January 2026, February 2026 and March 2026).The findings included: A review of the grievance logs from April 2025 to March 2026 showed that no grievances were filed on behalf of the Resident Council from April 2025 to December 2025. Further review of the log revealed grievances filed on behalf of Resident Council in January 2026, February 2026, and March 2026 had no documentation of complaints/grievances, plans to resolve the complaints/grievances or actions taken to resolve the complaints/grievances. The Resident Council minutes dated 4/16/25 and recorded by the Activity Director showed grievances related to housekeeping, dietary, and nursing services. Housekeeping concerns included bathrooms that were not consistently cleaned, delayed trash removal, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff and Pharmacist, the facility failed to implement a system to consistently and accurately reconcile controlled medications obtained from home for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medication management (Resident #8). As a result, a total of 31 tablets of Lorazepam (a controlled medication) were unaccounted for. The facility also failed to keep accurate records of controlled medications for 1 of 2 medication cart narcotic records reviewed.The findings included: 1.Resident #8 was admitted to the facility 1/9/26 for a respite stay with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder. Resident #8 had the following physician's orders for Lorazepam: 1/9/26 - Lorazepam oral tablet (benzodiazepine) one (1) milligram (mg) – give one tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for anxiety. This order was changed on 1/12/26 to Lorazepam oral tablet one (1) mg – give one tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for anxiety for 14 days. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow their infection control policies and procedures for Enhanced Barrier Precautions and hand hygiene when Nurse Aide (NA) #8, Medication Aide #1 and NA #10 did not wear personal protective equipment during incontinence care and when NA #8 did not change gloves and perform hand hygiene after contact with a soiled brief. In addition, the Treatment Nurse failed to change her gloves and perform hand hygiene during wound care. This deficiency occurred for 4 of 8 staff members observed for infection control practices (NA #8, NA #10, Medication Aide #1 and Treatment Nurse).The findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised on 6/4/25, indicated:Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) referred to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) by using gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities.High-contact activities included dressing, bathing, transferring, providing hygiene, changing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a functioning resident call system for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for resident call system (Residents #1).The findings included:Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) with hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side), chronic kidney disease, and chronic pain syndrome. The Care Plan revised 2/20/26 for Resident #1 had a focus for ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit with interventions to encourage the resident to use the bell to call for assistance and required supervision by 1 staff for toileting and personal hygiene. Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) on 3/25/26 indicated she was cognitively intact with adequate hearing and vision. She was coded as no impairment for upper extremity functional mobility. An interview was conducted with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained the resident's dignity by not providing incontinence care when needed. Resident #102 stated it made her feel bad having to wait a long time to be changed. This occurred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #102).The findings included:Resident #102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #102 was cognitively intact, had adequate vision, required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene and was frequently incontinent of both urine and bowel.During a continuous observation on 3/30/26 from 1:24 PM to 2:00 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #102 who was lying in bed in her room. Resident #102's call light was not on at the start of the observation. There was a faint odor of urine and feces upon entry into Resident #102's room. Resident #102 stated that she always had to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify law enforcement and Adult Protective Services (APS) for an initial allegation of injury of unknown origin. The facility also failed to submit a 5-day investigation report to the state agency within the required timeframe for 1 of 1 resident with an allegation of injury or unknown source (Resident #105). 1. Review of the facility policy dated 6/1/25 abuse, neglect and exploitation stated the facility was to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property.2. The procedure included:7. (A) The facility will have written procedure for reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes. A. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation involve…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and Power of Attorney, staff, Ombudsman, Hospital Case Manager and Medical Director interviews, the facility failed to allow a resident to return to the first available bed at the facility after being sent to the hospital for a medical and psychiatric evaluation. Resident #101 remained in the hospital for 11 days despite being cleared to return to the nursing home and was eventually discharged home. This deficient practice was evidenced for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for transfer and discharge (Resident #101).The findings included:Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bipolar disorder, delusional disorders and cataract.A review of a Change in Condition form for Resident #101 dated 2/6/26 at 8:47 AM indicated the resident was found lying in bed with a safety razor in hand and copious amount of blood on hands, wrists and abdomen. Multiple shallow lacerations noted to bilateral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit a request for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation for a resident with serious mental health disorders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #101).Findings included:A PASRR Determination Notification letter dated 9/04/25 revealed Resident #101 had a Level I PASRR with no expiration date.Resident #101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder in remission and delusional disorders. She was also diagnosed with major depressive disorder, single episode, severe with psychotic features. Resident #101's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was not currently considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have a serious mental illness or intellectual disability. Resident #101's active psychiatric/mood disorder diagnoses included depression, bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews with residents and staff, the facility failed to provide incontinence care (Resident #102) and showers as scheduled (Resident #77) for 2 of 6 dependent residents reviewed for assistance with activities of daily living.The findings included:1. Resident #102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia, weakness and reduced mobility.The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #102 was cognitively intact, had adequate vision, required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene and was frequently incontinent of both urine and bowel.Resident #102's care plan initiated on 2/24/26 indicated Resident #102 had an activities of daily living (ADL) performance deficit. Interventions included Resident #102 required maximum assistance by 1 to 2 staff for toileting. Further review of Resident #102's care plan indicated she had bladder incontinence. Interventions included change disposable briefs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) in the areas of behaviors, wandering, and the use of a wanderguard bracelet (used to protect residents from elopement) for 1 of 2 residents review for accuracy of assessments (Resident #1). The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), cognitive communication deficient and unspecified symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness. On 10/29/25 the Medical Director added the diagnosis adjustment reaction with aggression. The admission assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #1's mood was described as combative with staff, and his behavior was physically abusive. On 10/26/25 a behavioral note indicated that Resident #1 was exit seeking and unable to be redirected. He was striking staff and knocked over a water dispenser. Resident #1 had been up all night wandering the unit searching for exits. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$73,475 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $62,607 — penalty dated 2026-04-09
• $10,868 — penalty dated 2025-03-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVARDIS HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $586K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC