Skyline Nursing & Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 91 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 84.6 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-12-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure one (1) of 24 sampled residents were free of significant medication errors, Resident #6. This failure resulted in harm to Resident #6 requiring emergency care at the hospital. The findings included: Resident #6's clinical record listed diagnoses which included but not limited to other encephalopathy, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, and malignant neoplasm of sigmoid colon.Resident #6's most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 09/08/25 assigned the resident a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicated that the resident was severely cognitively impaired.Resident #6's clinical record was reviewed and contained a Surgical Clinic History and Physical/Consultation Note which read in part, [Resident #6] presented to the ED [emergency department] on 6/29/2025 and Ed note is as follows:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to notify a medical provider of a change in condition for (3) three of (24) twenty-four sampled residents. Resident #5, Resident #39, and Resident #51. The findings included:1.For Resident #5 the facility staff failed to notify a medical provider of the resident's transfer to a higher level of care on 4/22/25. Resident #5's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Chronic Kidney Disease-Stage 4, Hypertension, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, and Diabetes Mellitus Type 2. The most recent quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9/19/25 assigned the resident a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) summary score of 3 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating the resident was severely impaired in cognition. A review of Resident #5's census list disclosed that the resident had been transferred out of the facility on 4/22/25. A nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, facility staff failed to provide notification to the representative of the office of the local state long-term care ombudsman of a resident transfer to a higher level of care for (1) one of (24) twenty-four sampled residents. Resident #9. The findings included:For Resident #9, the facility staff failed to notify the office of the state long-term care ombudsman of a transfer/discharge to a higher level of care on 10/22/25. Resident #9's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, History of Falling, Age-Related Cognitive Decline, Osteoarthritis, Restlessness and Agitation, and Unspecified Fracture of Upper End of Left Humerus. The most recent significant change minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/14/25, assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 3 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating the resident was severely impaired in cognition. A nursing progress note dated 10/22/25 read in part, .Placed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, facility staff failed to process a medical provider order for (1) one of (20) twenty sampled residents, Resident #4 and the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for (1) one of (24) twenty-four sampled residents Resident #39. The findings included: 1. For Resident #4, the facility nursing staff failed to process a provider order for the medication Fluticasone Propionate inhaler. This provider ordered this medication on 11/26/25 and the order was not processed until 12/01/25. Resident #4's diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #4's annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/14/25 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 3 out of a possible 15 points. Per the MDS manual a score of 3=severe impairment in cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident #4's comprehensive care plan included the focus area COPD.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide services and/or treatment to prevent further decrease in range of motion, including the provision of equipment for limited range of motion for (1) one of (24) twenty-four sampled residents. Resident #10. The findings included:For Resident #10, the facility staff failed to provide a right knee brace as ordered by a medical provider to prevent abduction and external rotation of the right hip for contracture management. Resident #10's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury, Muscle Weakness, Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Quadriplegia, Contracture Right Hand, Contracture Left Hand, Paraplegia, Contracture Right Knee, Contracture Left Knee, Contracture Right Ankle, Contracture Left Ankle, and Abnormal Posture. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/5/25, was coded in Section C (Cognitive Patterns) to indicate Resident #10 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for (1) one of (24) twenty-four sampled residents, Resident #4. The findings included:The facility staff failed to ensure the provider ordered medication Fluticasone Propionate inhaler was available for administration on 12/01/25 and 12/02/25.Resident #4's diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #4's annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/14/25 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 3 out of a possible 15 points. Per the MDS manual a score of 3=severe impairment in cognitive skills for daily decision making.Resident #4's comprehensive care plan included the focus area COPD. Interventions included administer medications as ordered.Resident #4's clinical record included a provider order for the medication Fluticasone Propionate inhaler 2 puffs every…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow-up on pharmacy recommendations for (3) three of (24) twenty-four sampled residents, Resident #11, Resident #12, and Resident #23. The findings included:1. For Resident #11, the facility staff failed to follow up on a pharmacy recommendation for 07/15/25. The facility staff were unable to locate this recommendation. Resident #11's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, protein calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, and vascular dementia. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #11's significant change in status minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 09/17/25 was coded 1/1/3 to indicate this resident had problems with long- and short-term memory and was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident #11's clinical record included a progress note dated 07/15/25. The pharmacist had transcribed that a medication regimen review had been completed and to see their .report for any…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and/or accurate clinical record for (2) two of (24) twenty-four sampled residents. Resident #6 and Resident #10. The findings included:1 For Resident #6 the facility staff filed another resident's Durable Do Not Resuscitate form in Resident #6's clinical record. Resident #6's clinical record contained diagnoses not limited to Alzheimer's disease, unspecified. Resident #6's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 09/08/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 3 out 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. Resident #6's clinical record was reviewed and contained a Durable Do Not Resuscitate form belonging to another resident. The concern of another resident's information being in Resident #6's clinical record was discussed with the administrator, director of nursing, staff educator, unit managers, and business office manager on 12/04/25 at 1:45 pm. No further information was provided prior to exit. 2. For…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The findings included: For the infection control program, the facility staff failed to follow the enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) process and maintain infection control interventions to help reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities for facility residents with wounds and indwelling medical devices. This surveyor requested and received a list of residents on EBP. One resident was listed on the report for a dialysis access port. A review of the complete matrix for the facility indicated three facility residents had indwelling catheters, one resident had a stage II pressure ulcer, and one resident had a feeding tube and a tracheostomy. One…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident's medical provider and/or responsible party (RP) was notified of a significant weight loss for one (1) of 20 sampled residents, Resident #9. For Resident #9, the facility staff failed to notify the resident's medical provider and/or responsible party (RP) of the resident's following weight changes: on 7/1/22 Resident #9's weight was documented as 121.4 pounds; on 7/5/22 Resident #9's weight was documented as 121.4 pounds; and on 8/2/22 Resident #9's weight was documented as 114.6 pounds. The findings include: Resident #9's clinical documentation failed to provide evidence of medical provider and/or responsible party (RP) notification of the resident's aforementioned weight loss. Resident #9's minimum data set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/1/22, was dated as completed on 7/7/22. Resident #9 was assessed as sometimes able to make self understood and sometimes able to understand others. Resident #9 was assessed as having short-term…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide notice in writing to the resident and resident representative prior to a facility transfer or discharge for 1 of 20 residents in the survey sample, Resident #32. For Resident #32, the facility failed to provide the resident written notice to include the reason for the move prior to transfer to an acute care hospital. The findings included: Resident #32's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus Infection, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Atrial Fibrillation, Essential Hypertension, and Mediastinitis. The admission minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/08/22 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #32's clinical record revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on 8/18/22. On 9/21/22 at 2:56 pm, surveyor spoke with the Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,358 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-12-04
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-04 for 16 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVARDIS HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $430K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA