No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Biltmore Haven Nursing and Rehabilitation

3864 Sweeten Creek Road, Arden, NC 28704 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (828) 681-0904 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0602, F0607) — most recent May 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations2 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$189,174 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0602, F0607) — most recent May 2025
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $189,174 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-12)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2512 Hendersonville Rd · (828) 376-7100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2501 Hendersonville Rd · (828) 684-5375 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2377 Hendersonville Rd · (828) 768-5492 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3867 Sweeten Creek Rd · (828) 759-5454

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.8%15.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.3%7.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.7%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.6%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%5.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.1%18.3%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.6%21.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.2%94.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%5.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.0%20.7%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.3%14.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.3%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine15.2%78.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission40.9%22.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.1%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.091.781.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.731.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.2%CMS range 30.0–54.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 6.7–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 5.0–14.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.68
RN hours/ resident / day
0.30
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.95
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.93
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.57
RN hoursweekends
71.4%
Total nursing turnover
88.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 75.7 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.93 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.03 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-01)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, staff, Nurse Practitioner and Medical Director interviews, Driver #1 failed to have Resident #1 assessed for injury by a qualified medical professional prior to moving the resident following a fall in the transportation van. Resident #1's wheelchair tipped over backwards with Resident #1 in the wheelchair resulting in the resident hitting his head on the van floor. Driver #1 lifted Resident #1 while in his wheelchair back to the upright position and returned to the facility without calling Emergency Medical Services for assistance. Driver #1 was not qualified to provide a comprehensive physical assessment to determine if Resident #1 had sustained any injuries. Upon arrival at the facility, Driver #1 did not notify the Administrator or Director of Nursing and returned Resident #1 back to his hall and told a staff member that Resident #1 had fallen backwards in the wheelchair on the facility transport van. When Medication Aide (MA) #1 gave Resident #1 a haircut, a raised area was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews with resident, staff, Nurse Practitioner and Medical Director, Driver #1 failed to provide safe transportation on 03/02/2026 when Resident #1's lap belt and front retractor tie-downs (retractor tie-down systems are often called a 4-point securement system) were not correctly applied per manufacturer's instructions leaving Resident #1 not fully secured while in his wheelchair in the facility transport van. Resident #1, who only had one leg, and no hands, was being transported to a medical appointment by Driver #1. As the vehicle accelerated from a full stop at a traffic light, Resident #1's wheelchair tipped over backward with Resident #1 in the wheelchair resulting in the resident hitting his head on the van floor. Resident #1 sustained a hematoma (a localized collection of blood that pools outside of a blood vessel, usually due to trauma or injury) and abrasion to the mid to top area on the back of his head. A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed Resident #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-01-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews with the resident and staff, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy for protection after Resident #52 reported on 12/28/23 that Nurse Aide (NA) #1 had been providing her with methamphetamine and syringes. The facility failed to suspend NA #1 and allowed her to work her scheduled shift on 12/28/23 from 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM on 12/29/23. This deficient practice had the high likelihood of serious adverse outcome for 10 residents with history of substance abuse which included Resident #52. Immediate jeopardy started on 12/28/23 when the facility failed to follow their abuse policy and protect all residents with a history of substance abuse including Resident #52 by not suspending NA #1 after Resident #52 alleged that NA #1 had been supplying her with methamphetamine and syringes at the facility. Immediate jeopardy was removed on 1/12/24 when the facility implemented an acceptable credible allegation on immediate jeopardy removal. The facility remains out of compliance at a lower scope and severity of E (no actual harm with potential for more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews with resident, staff, Nurse Practitioner, Medical Director and Police Officer, the facility failed to discuss with Resident #52 the presence of many needles found in her possession at the hospital, monitor for illegal substances in her room and supervise Resident #52 for triggers of illegal substance abuse for a resident with a known history of substance abuse. Resident #52 was found with many needles in her room while in the hospital on 9/22/23. On 10/5/23, Resident #52 was sent to the hospital after a sudden onset of lethargy, low oxygen saturation and increased heart rate. Hospital staff documented suspicion of illicit drug use. Staff observed drug paraphernalia in her room including vape pens (a handheld device consisting of a battery attached to a cartridge filled with a concentrate), syringes (some used with old blood in the syringe and some with medication residual), medicine cups with medication residual, and flushes. The facility failed to notify law…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-01-16 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interviews with resident, staff, Nurse Practitioner, Medical Director and Police Officer, the facility failed to provide effective leadership and implement effective systems to manage and supervise a resident with a history of substance abuse after syringes were found in Resident #52's room and protect all residents after Resident #52 reported Nurse Aide #1 was providing her with methamphetamine and syringes. This failure had a high likelihood of affecting other facility residents. Immediate jeopardy started on 10/5/23 when after observing drug paraphernalia in Resident #52's room the facility's administrative team failed to identify the seriousness of the situation and put effective systems in place. Immediate jeopardy was removed on 1/12/24 when the facility implemented an acceptable credible allegation on immediate jeopardy removal. The facility remains out of compliance at a lower scope and severity of E (no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy) to ensure education is completed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-01-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to obtain dental services when ordered by the medical provider for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dental services (Resident #52). The findings included: Resident #52 was admitted on [DATE]. with diagnosis that included quadriplegia. Resident #52's quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] coded Resident #52 as cognitively intact and with no dental concerns. A review of a Nurse Practitioner (NP) progress note dated 7/14/23 read in part Resident #52 was seen for reports of dental pain and possible infected gum. The NP additionally wrote the resident had a cavity in the left lower molar and a referral to the inhouse dentist was made. The NP's plan of treatment included using a numbing gel to help numb the pain and clindamycin (antibiotic) 150 mg capsules 2 times daily for 5 days. A review of Resident #52's physician orders revealed an order dated 7/14/23. The order read to set up in-house dental referral for dental abscess/pain/cavities for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-06-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews the facility failed to obtain laboratory testing as ordered for a resident with complaints of abdominal pain and decreased appetite. Resident #3 was sent to the Emergency Department (ED) after a change in condition and diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (UTI) requiring hospitalization. This was for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hydration. Findings included: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility 08/21/15 with diabetes and adult failure to thrive (a state of decline). Review of NP #1's note dated 02/14/22 revealed she saw Resident #3 for decreased appetite and epigastric discomfort (upper abdominal pain just below the ribs). The note stated she would check a complete blood count (abbreviated as CBC and meaning a blood test which can check for a variety of conditions including anemia, infection, and kidney function), and a comprehensive metabolic panel (abbreviated as CMP and meaning a test which checks the body's chemical balance and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-01 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit accurate payroll data on the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) report to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) related to Registered Nurse (RN) hours and licensed nursing coverage 24-hours per day. This was for 1 of 3 quarters reviewed for sufficient nurse staffing (Quarter 1: October 1-December 31, 2024). Findings included: The PBJ report for the Fiscal Year Quarter 1 2025 (October 1 through December 31, 2024) revealed there were no Registered Nurse (RN) hours for 10/12/24, 10/13/24, 11/17/24, 12/14/24, 12/15/24, and 12/22/24. The PBJ report also noted the facility failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours a day for 10/12/24, 10/13/24, 11/09/24, 11/10/24, 11/17/24, and 12/14/24. The daily staff schedules for 10/12/24, 10/13/24, 12/14/24, 12/15/24, and 12/22/24 revealed there was a RN onsite for at least 8 hours a day. Further review revealed on 11/17/24 there was no RN onsite for at least 8 hours a day. The nursing staff time detail reports for 10/12/24, 10/13/24, 11/17/24, 12/14/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with the Law Enforcement Detective and staff, the facility failed to protect the residents' rights to be free from misappropriation of controlled medication for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property (Residents #173, #174, #175, and #176). The findings included: The facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation policy, last revised on 11/16/22, revealed in part the facility would ensure all residents were free from misappropriation of property. a. Resident #173 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder and anxiety disorder. The physician's order dated 01/16/25 revealed Resident #173 had an order to receive one tablet of clonazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth every morning (6:00 AM) and at bedtime (9:00 PM) for anxiety/panic attacks. The pharmacy proof of delivery shipment summary sheet revealed 60 tablets of clonazepam 0.5 mg were shipped on 02/18/25 for Resident #173 and was received by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to record opened dates on multi-dose oral inhalers and label and date opened multi-dose bottles of eye drops on 3 of 4 medication carts (400 Hall, 200 Hall, and 300 Hall) reviewed for medication storage. Findings included: 1. An observation was made of the 400 Hall medication cart on 05/01/25 at 2:35 PM in the presence of Medication Aide (MA) #1. The observation revealed the following: (a). An opened and undated 7.5 milliliter (ml) multi-dose bottle of Neomycin and Polymyxin (antibiotics) eye drops were stored on the medication cart. The manufacturer recommended dating the eye drops when they were opened and discarding on or before the expiration date. (b). An opened and undated multi-dose bottle of Prednisolone Acetate (steroid) 1% eye drops was stored on the medication cart. The manufacturer recommended dating the eye drops when they were opened and discarding them on or before the expiration date. (c). An opened, undated, and unlabeled 15 ml multi-dose bottle of Polyethylene Glycol 400 4% and Propylene…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations and interviews with staff, the facility failed to follow the meal spreadsheet and posted menu when they ran out of a food item while plating meals. This deficient practice impacted 7-9 residents who did not receive regular consistency carrots for their lunch meal. Findings included: The facility's menu spreadsheet for the lunch meal dated 4/29/25 was reviewed. The spreadsheet read Swedish meatballs with gray, buttered noodles, and sliced carrots. On 4/29/25 at 11:40 AM an observation of the lunch meal tray line found the posted lunch meal was Swedish Meatballs with gravy, buttered noodles, and carrots. An observation of the tray line on 4/29/25 at 12:12 PM found the [NAME] plating the last available serving of regular consistency carrots from the trayline. On 4/29/25 at 12:14 PM the [NAME] stated there were not enough regular consistency carrots to finish serving the 300 hall residents (7-9) for the meal. The [NAME] said she had used all the carrots available in the kitchen for the meal. She also said the District Dietary Manager was cooking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to remove food stored past the use by date from the dry goods storage area. Additionally, the facility failed to clean a circulatory fan cover and prevent water from dripping onto stored food in 1 of 2 kitchen refrigerators (the walk-in refrigerator). This practice had the potential affect food served to residents. The findings included: a. On 4/27/25 at 10:20 AM an observation of the dry goods storage area's bread rack with a fill in Dietary Manager (DM #2) from a sister facility found stored bread past the use by date. DM #2 stated the facility's Dietary Manager (DM #1) was not available on 4/27/25, and he was filling in for the day. The bread rack contained 8 loaves of sliced bread with a use by date of 4/25/25 and 3 packages of hamburger buns with a use by date of 4/23/25. The DM #2 stated during the observation the procedure was to remove the bread from the [NAME] rack and place it into the freezer before the use by date. The DM #2 stated the DM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to reschedule and hold a care plan meeting that was previously cancelled and invite the resident to participate in the care planning process for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #43). Findings included: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a Care Conference Record dated 12/02/24 revealed a quarterly care plan meeting was held with Resident #43 in attendance. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 had intact cognition. Review of a Social Worker (SW) progress note dated 03/11/25 revealed Resident #43 was currently in the hospital and his care plan meeting would be rescheduled upon his return to the facility. Review of a physician progress note dated 03/17/25 revealed Resident #43 was seen for a post-hospitalization visit following his hospital stay on 03/08/25 through 03/14/25. Review of Resident #43's electronic medical record revealed no documentation that a care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to assess residents for the ability to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for self-administering medications (Resident #59). The findings included: Resident #59 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included type 2 diabetes and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Resident #59 had a physician's order for calcium carbonate antacid 2 tablets every 6 hours as needed for gastroesophageal reflex disease ordered 10/9/24. Resident #59's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] coded her as cognitively intact. A review of Resident #59's care plan dated 3/7/25 revealed no care plan for self-administration of medication. A review of Resident #59's medical record found no assessment for self-administration of medication. An observation in Resident #59's room on 4/28/25 at 10:58 AM found a partially used bottle of liquid bismuth, a bottle of chewable antacids, and an unopened box of [topical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident, Family Member and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a discharge planning process in place that included documentation of referrals submitted to other skilled nursing facilities (SNF) and documenting the responses to the referrals submitted for a resident who wished to discharge to another SNF closer to family for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #41). Findings included: Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included quadriplegia (form of paralysis that affects all four limbs and torso, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, osteomyelitis (bone infection), bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder. Resident #41's comprehensive care plans included a discharge care plan, initiated on 06/13/23 and last revised on 02/02/24, that revealed Resident #41 wished to return to a facility closer to her family and would remain at the current facility for long-term care until a transfer could be made. Review of the Social Services progress notes for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #19 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #19's diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia that was present on admission [DATE]). Resident #19 was care planned for receiving antipsychotic therapy (haloperidol) for diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia dated 10/28/24. Resident #19's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included an active diagnosis of schizophrenia. A review of Resident #19's physician orders revealed an order for haloperidol 0.5 milligrams 2 times daily for diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia dated 3/14/25. Resident #19's quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] did not include an active diagnoses of schizophrenia. On 5/01/25 at 11:57 AM the MDS Nurse stated Resident #19 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia. The MDS Nurse stated she was directed to not code a diagnosis of schizophrenia on the MDS by direction of the facilities corporate office after Resident #19's annual MDS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan that addressed the resident's immediate needs within 48 hours of admission for 4 of 13 sampled residents (Residents #73, #16, #72, and #323). The findings included: 1. Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (absence of enough oxygen in the tissues to sustain bodily functions) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (difficulty breathing). The nursing admission data collection assessment initiated on 04/28/25 and completed on 04/29/25 revealed Resident #73 received insulin injections, antidepressant and diuretic medications. Review of Resident 73's electronic medical record on 04/29/25 revealed no evidence a baseline care plan that addressed her immediate needs was initiated or completed within 48 hours of her admission to the facility on [DATE]. During an interview on 04/30/25 at 9:13 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to perform activities of daily living (ADL) care for a resident (Resident #30). This was for 1 of 11 residents reviewed for (ADL) care. Findings included: Resident #30 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease. A review of Resident #30's care plan dated 5/2/24 found he had a care plan for activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to generalized muscle weakness and impaired mobility. Interventions included improved level of function in ADL performance through next review date, clean, check nail length and trim on bath days. An additional intervention included revealed Resident #30 required set-up or clean-up assistance with personal hygiene. A review of Resident #30's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessmnet dated 1/28/25 coded him as cognitively intact. Resident #30 had impairment to both sides for upper and lower extremities, needed maximum assistance with bathing, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to post cautionary and safety signs that indicated the use of oxygen and ensure the physician order included the oxygen flow rate (amount of oxygen administered in liters per minute) and delivery method (nasal cannula) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #73). Findings included: Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (absence of enough oxygen in the tissues to sustain bodily functions) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (difficulty breathing). A physician's order dated 04/25/25 for Resident #73 read, respiratory: oxygen-continuous. The physician order did not indicate the oxygen flow rate to be administered or directions or how the oxygen was to be delivered, such as nasal cannula. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment (tool used to gauge an individual's cognition) dated 04/25/25 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to assess a resident for risk of entrapment prior to installing and/or using bed rails for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #18). Findings Included: Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her cumulative diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (partial weakness on one side of the body) following cerebrovascular disease (conditions that affect blood flow to the brain) affecting the left dominant side, left knee contracture and chronic pain. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 had intact cognition. She had impairment on one side of the lower extremity, was dependent on staff for assistance with bed mobility and did not use bed rails during the MDS assessment look-back period. During an observation and interview on 04/27/25 at 11:20 AM, quarter bed rails were observed in the upright position on each side…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure Nurse Aides (NA) were able to demonstrate the competency and skills necessary for providing care to meet the individual care needs of residents' that included hand hygiene during incontinence care for 3 of 5 employee files reviewed (NA #2, NA #3 and NA #4). On 04/30/25, NA #3 did not remove soiled gloves and perform hand hygiene before applying a clean brief and touching other items in the resident's environment after providing incontinent care to a dependent resident. Findings included: This tag is crossed referenced to: F 880: Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to implement their infection control policies when Nurse Aide (NA) #3 did not don (put on) a gown while providing urinary catheter (a tube that drains urine out of the body) care to Resident #65 who required enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) due to the presence of a urinary catheter and failed to follow their Hand Hygiene policy when NA #3 did not remove soiled gloves and perform…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records by not documenting when residents admitted to the facility, discharged from the facility or expired at the facility for 3 of 23 sampled residents (Residents #73, #71, and #72). Findings included: 1. The profile page in Resident #73's electronic medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the staff progress notes for Resident #73 revealed no entry on [DATE] regarding her admission to the facility, such as the time of her arrival, condition or care needs. An unsuccessful telephone attempt was made [DATE] at 2:43 PM to interview Nurse #2 who had provided Resident #73's care on [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:14 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she would have expected for the nurse to have written a progress note when Resident #73 admitted to the facility that included details such as the time she arrived to the facility and her condition upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to implement their infection control policies when Nurse Aide (NA) #3 did not don (put on) a gown while providing urinary catheter (a tube that drains urine out of the body) care to Resident #65 who required enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and failed to follow their Hand Hygiene policy when NA #3 did not remove soiled gloves and perform hand hygiene before applying a clean brief and touching other items in the resident's environment while providing incontinence care to Resident #65. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 4 staff members observed for infection control practices (NA #3). Findings included: Review of the facility's Hand Hygiene policy last revised 02/05/21 read in part as follows: The CDC [Centers for Disease Control] defines hand hygiene as cleaning your hands by using either handwashing (washing with soap and water), antiseptic hand wash, or antiseptic hand rubs (i.e. alcohol-based sanitizer including foam or gel). Hand Hygiene should be performed before initiating a clean procedure,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and staff interviews the facility failed to: 1) maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen; 2) failed to remove gloves and perform hand hygiene after handling dirty dishes; 3) failed to date opened food items stored in the walk-in refrigerator ready for use; 4) failed to discard thickened juice by the date it could no longer be used; and 5) failed to seal and date an open bag of cereal for 1 of 1 kitchen. These practices had the potential to affect ninety-one (91) residents who resided in the facility. Findings included: The initial walk-through observation of the kitchen was conducted on 2/26/24 from 9:05 AM through 10:06 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM). The observations revealed the following: 1 a. During an observation on 2/26/24 at 9:14 AM a metal table with sliding cabinet doors used to store hot and cold beverage serving containers appeared dirty. The tracks on the metal table used to open and shut the cabinet doors had a thick buildup of black colored debris all along the tracks and the inside of the cabinets had crumb-like and paper debris…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's toenails were trimmed for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1). Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease and edema. A physician's order dated 09/27/23 for Resident #1 read, Podiatry as needed. A review of Resident #1's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan, last revised on 12/04/23, addressed an ADL self-care performance deficit related to dementia. Interventions included: requires partial to moderate staff assistance with personal hygiene, staff to check nail length, trim and clean on bath day and as necessary, and report any changes to the nurse. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #1 required partial to moderate staff assistance with bathing and personal hygiene and displayed no rejection of care during the MDS assessment period. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and interviews with staff the facility failed to store an unopened insulin pen in the refrigerator until needed for use for 1 of 4 medication carts (200/300 Hall medication cart) and failed to remove medicated mouthwash by the date it was to be discarded from 1 of 1 medication refrigerator reviewed for medication storage. Findings included: 1. Review of manufacturer's package insert recommended to store unused (unopened) insulin aspart in a refrigerator between 36°F to 46°F and in-use (opened) insulin at room temperature for 28 days. An observation of the 200/300 Hall medication cart was conducted with the Unit Manager (UM) on 2/26/24 at 3:54 PM. Stored on the medication cart and available for use was an unopened insulin aspart (fast-acting) pen. There was no date on the insulin pen to indicate when it was placed on the medication cart. During an interview on 2/26/24 at 3:54 PM the UM revealed the insulin aspart pen should be kept in the designated medication refrigerator until needed for use. She stated the nurses were expected to label the pen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions that the committee put into place following the recertification survey completed on [DATE]. This was for a repeat deficiency in the area of label/store drugs and biologicals that was originally cited during the recertification survey completed on [DATE] and subsequently recited during the revisit and complaint investigation completed on [DATE]. The continued failure of the facility during two federal surveys of record shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAA Program. The findings included: This tag is cross referenced to: F761: Based on record review, observations, and interviews with staff the facility failed to store an unopened insulin pen in the refrigerator until needed for use for 1 of 4 medication carts (200/300 Hall medication cart) and failed to remove medicated mouthwash by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-16 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff, Nurse Practitioners and the Medical Director, the facility failed to have systems in place to prevent a delay in obtaining mental health services for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for behavioral and emotional status (Resident #19). The findings included: Resident #19's medical record contained a Preadmission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) Level II dated 8/23/23. The notification indicated that the resident's placement in a nursing facility was appropriate with a recommendation for resident to attend individual or group psychotherapy. The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the hospital for suicidal ideation and urinary tract infection. She received antibiotics and was referred to a psychiatric provider. Psychiatry determined that Resident #19's suicidal thoughts/comments were due to grief about being lonely and not having anyone to care for her. Resident #19 also had diagnoses of bipolar disorder, depression, and anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with the resident, staff, Consultant Pharmacist, and Medical Director (MD), the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for as needed (PRN) psychotropic drug (drug that affects mental state) was time limited in duration and provided rationales for therapy exceeding 14 days for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents #61). The findings included: Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder. A physician's order dated 11/15/23 indicated Resident #61 had an order to receive 1 tablet of Ativan 0.5 milligram (mg) by mouth once every 8 hours as needed for agitation. This active order did not have a stop date and the rationales for extended therapy beyond 14 days were not found in Resident #61's medical records. A review of the medication administration record (MAR) revealed Resident #61 had received 4 doses of PRN Ativan in November, 8 doses in December 2023, and 1 dose in January 2024 on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with the resident, staff, Consultant Pharmacist, and Medical Director (MD), the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error when nursing staff failed to follow physician's parameter as ordered during insulin and blood pressure medication administration. As a result, Resident #61 had received 6 doses of unnecessary Novolin insulin and 4 doses of blood pressure medication within 24 days. This affected 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #61). The findings included: Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM) and high blood pressure. A physician's order dated 11/11/23 indicated Resident #61 had an order to receive 1 tablet of metoprolol (blood pressure drug) 25 milligrams (mg) via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (G tubes) 2 times daily for high blood pressure. The order set a parameter to hold the metoprolol if systolic blood pressure was less than 100 or pulse less than 60. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to secure an opened tube of antifungal cream for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #61) reviewed for medication storage, failed to record opening date for 3 opened insulin pens in 1 of 4 medication carts (500 Hall medication cart), and failed to remove expired over the counter (OTC) medications in accordance with the manufacturer's expiration date for 1 of 4 medication carts (500 Hall medication cart) and 1 of 1 medication room observed during medication storage checks (Main medication room). The findings included: a. During an observation conducted on 01/08/24 at 12:17 PM, an opened tube of antifungal cream containing approximately 100 grams of 2% miconazole nitrate was found left unattended on top of the over-bed table next to Resident #61's bed. Resident #61 was not in the room during the observation. An interview was conducted with Nurse #5 on 01/08/24 at 12:21 PM. She stated she had not been to Resident #61's room in the morning as she had administered her morning medications in the hallway. She denied…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-16 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide snacks for 7 out of 7 residents that requested bedtime snacks (Resident #67, #34, #65, #5, #10, #60, #74). The findings included: During a resident council meeting on 1/10/24 at 2:08 PM, the residents in attendance (Resident #67, #34, #65, #5, #10, #60, #74) all complained about not always receiving snacks at bedtime or whenever they requested some. Resident #60 stated she could ask for a snack whenever she needed them, but the dietary staff did not always remember to refill the snack room and there were not a lot of choices or variety in the snacks that they had. Resident #60 stated this concerned her especially at bedtime when she needed to eat a snack because she was a diabetic and they didn't have any snacks available in the nourishment room. Resident #34 voiced agreement and stated that this happened all the time. He added that the snack drawer was empty from the night before and the staff didn't have any snacks to give out to the residents. An observation on 1/10/24 at 2:30 PM with Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interview, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions the committee put into place following the recertification survey conducted on 06/24/22 and the complaint investigation survey conducted on 05/03/23. This was for a repeat deficiency in the area of accident hazards/supervision/devices that was originally cited on 06/24/22 during the recertification survey, and subsequently recited during the complaint investigation survey completed on 05/03/23, and recertification survey completed on 01/16/24. The continued failure of the facility during three federal surveys of record shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAA program. The findings included: This tag is cross referenced to: F 689 - Based on record review, observations, and interviews with resident, staff, Nurse Practitioner, Medical Director and Police Officer, the facility failed to discuss with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-16 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide behavioral health training that included the competencies and skills necessary to provide care for residents with substance use disorder for 9 of 9 nursing staff (Nurse Aide #3, Nurse Aide #6, Nurse Aide #5, Nurse Aide #7, Nurse Aide #9, Nurse Aide #10, Nurse Aide #8, Nurse #3 and Unit Manager) reviewed for education requirements. The findings included: Education records from 2/1/23 to 12/12/23 provided by the Administrator were reviewed for the following nursing staff: Nurse Aide (NA) #3: There was no behavioral health training recorded on the education records. NA #6: There was no behavioral health training recorded on the education records. NA #5: There was no behavioral health training recorded on the education records. NA #7: There was no behavioral health training recorded on the education records. NA #9: There was no behavioral health training recorded on the education records. NA #10: There was no behavioral health training recorded on the education records. NA #8: There was no behavioral health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews with staff, Nurse Practitioner and Medical Director, the facility failed to have accurate advanced directive information documented throughout the medical record for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for code status (Resident #81). The findings included: A yellow Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form dated 12/13/23 was noted in Resident #81's electronic health record. Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A pink Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form dated 12/17/23 was in Resident #81's electronic health record and in the MOST forms book at the nurses' station. This form indicated to attempt resuscitation when Resident #81 had no pulse and was not breathing. The form was signed by the Nurse Practitioner on 12/17/23 and by Resident #81 on 12/17/23. The Medical Director's History and Physical written on 12/21/23 indicated Resident #81's code status was Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNR/no Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation). The Medical Director wrote that Resident #81…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan that addressed substance use disorder for 1 of 3 sampled residents with a known history of substance abuse (Resident #52). The findings included: Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, cervical intraspinal abscess due to history of intravenous drug use, and opioid dependence with other opioid-induced disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #52 was cognitively intact and had no behaviors. The MDS further indicated Resident #52 received antipsychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, opioid and antiplatelet medications. Resident #52's care plan last reviewed on 12/20/23 indicated Resident #52 had an ADL self-care performance deficit, hypotension (low blood pressure), was at risk for falls, had anemia, was on antipsychotic therapy, used anti-anxiety medications, used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with the staff, Consultant Pharmacist, and Medical Director (MD), the Consultant Pharmacist failed to identify drug irregularities related to the use of as needed (PRN) psychotropic drug (drug that affects mental state) and provide recommendations for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents #61). The findings included: Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder. A physician's order dated 11/15/23 indicated 1 tablet of Ativan 0.5 milligram (mg) by mouth once every 8 hours as needed for agitation was ordered for Resident #61. This active order did not have a stop date and the rationales for extended therapy beyond 14 days were not found in Resident #61's medical records. A review of the medication administration record (MAR) revealed Resident #61 had received 4 doses of PRN Ativan in November, 8 doses in December 2023, and 1 dose in January 2024. A review of medical records revealed the Consultant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and staff interview, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions the committee put into place following the recertification survey conducted on 6/24/22 and the complaint investigation survey conducted on 5/3/23. This was for a repeat deficiency in the area of infection control that was originally cited on 6/24/22 during the recertification survey, and subsequently recited during the complaint investigation surveys completed on 5/3/23 and 12/28/23. The continued failure of the facility during three federal surveys of record shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAA program. The findings included: This tag is cross referenced to: F880 - Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their infection control policy when Nurse #1 did not perform hand hygiene after removing soiled dressings with drainage and before donning new gloves to cleanse the wound for 3 of 3 wound care observations on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their infection control policy when Nurse #1 did not perform hand hygiene after removing a soiled dressings with drainage and before donning new gloves to cleanse the wound for 3 of 3 wound care observations on 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #2 and Resident #3). The findings included: The facility's policy entitled Hand Hygiene Policies and Procedures which is part of their Infection Control Policies and Procedures last revised on 2/5/21 indicated that hand hygiene should be performed: * After contact with blood, body fluids, or excretions, mucous membranes, non-intact skin, or wound dressings. * When hands are moved from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during patient care. * After glove removal. a. An observation of wound care by Nurse #1 was made on 12/28/23 at 10:07 AM. Nurse #1 rubbed hand sanitizer to both hands and put on gloves. She removed the old dressing which included a packing on Resident #2's buttock wound. The old dressing including the packing had moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to establish and implement infection control policies and procedures to reduce the risk of growth and spread of Legionella in the building water systems which could affect 83 out of 83 residents. In addition, the facility failed to implement infection control policies and procedures when the Staff Development Coordinator failed to perform hand washing after the removal of gloves during wound care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #44) and when 1 of 7 Nurse Aides (NA #5) and the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) failed to perform hand washing after the removal of gloves following the transfer of 1 of 1 resident (Resident #56) observed during a mechanical lift transfer. These failures occurred during a global pandemic. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility's Emergency Preparedness plan revealed no information related to a facility water safety management program to minimize the risk of transmission of Legionella Disease to the residents, staff, and visitors by testing the water. In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to properly label and store personal items for 2 of 36 bathrooms (bathrooms of room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]), maintain clean and sanitary walls for 1 of 36 bathrooms (bathroom room [ROOM NUMBER]), maintain walls in good repair for 1 of 54 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]), and maintain clean and sanitary privacy curtains for 3 of 54 rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The deficient practice affected 3 of 5 halls (200, 300, and 400 halls). Findings included: 1. An observation and interview on 06/20/22 at 11:20 AM revealed Resident #38's privacy curtain in room [ROOM NUMBER] had several white stains scattered in the middle and lower part of the dark green curtain. Resident #38 voiced she did not like that her privacy curtain looked dirty and stained and stated when she mentioned it to facility staff, they were going to replace it with a new one but haven't. She added, maybe they could at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-24 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to request a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) review for residents with a new mental health diagnosis for 4 of 6 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR (Residents #10, #37, #62, and #69). Findings included: 1. A PASRR Notification letter dated 08/08/16 revealed Resident #10 had a Level 1 PASRR with no expiration date. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #10's list of cumulative diagnoses contained in his medical record revealed a new diagnosis of major depressive disorder with the onset date of 06/02/21. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was not currently considered by the state Level II PASRR process to have a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability. During an interview on 06/10/22 at 9:47 AM, the Social Worker (SW) explained she was new to the position and was unaware of the regulation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to treat a resident in a dignified manner, when a nurse spoke abruptly to a resident (Resident #44) without looking at her to acknowledge her request for a cup of ice. This affected 1 of 4 residents reviewed for dignity and respect and made Resident #44 feel bad. The findings included: Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebrovascular accident or stroke, and hemiplegia. Resident #44's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed she was severely cognitively impaired and was on a therapeutic diet with thin liquids. Resident #44's assessment also revealed the resident was always understood and always understands. Observation on 06/21/22 at 3:05 PM of Resident #44 revealed she was at the nurse's station sitting in her wheelchair holding a white cup. Nurse #4 walked in front of the resident and the resident asked Nurse #4 for a cup of ice. Nurse #4 without looking at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident, and staff interviews the facility failed to honor a resident's request to get out of bed to attend a scheduled activity for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for choices (Resident #16). The findings included: Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including lack of coordination and heart failure. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #16's cognition was intact with no refusal of care during the lookback period. The MDS also indicated Resident #16 required total assistance by 2-person using a mechanical lift for transfers. The Care Plan (CP) revised on 01/26/22 revealed Resident #16 was independent for meeting social needs but due to immobility and physical limitations might need encouragement and reminders to activities. The CP goals included to attend and participate in activities of choice. The interventions directed nursing staff to assist and escort and listed bingo as one of Resident #16's preferred…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide bathing as scheduled for 1 of 9 residents dependent on staff for activities of daily living (Resident #68). The findings included: Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #68's diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident (loss of blood flow to the brain) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (restricted airflow to the lungs). The Care Plan last revised on 05/16/22 identified Resident #68 as having a self-care performance deficit related to impaired balance and limited mobility. The goal was for Resident #68 to remain at her current level of functioning and included the intervention to provide extensive to total assistance with showers per protocol and as necessary. Review of Resident #68's activity of daily living documentation for April, May and June 2022 revealed bathing was scheduled during evening shift on Wednesday and Saturday. For the month of April bed baths were documented as given on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent a fall during a transfer with a mechanical lift which resulted in the resident bumping his head and right hand on the floor for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for supervision to prevent accidents (Resident #56). The findings included: Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of spinal cord injury. Review of Resident #56's care plan dated 07/21/20 and revised on 05/19/21 revealed in part, he had a self-care deficit in the area of activities of daily living and required total assist of 1-2 staff to turn and reposition in bed as necessary. He also required a mechanical lift with the assistance of 2 staff members for transfers between his wheelchair and bed. The care plan also indicated Resident # 56 was at risk for falls. Fall prevention interventions included in part, reminders to keep his call bell within reach and providing re-education for Resident # 56 on the risks of keeping his bed in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain sufficient nursing staff to ensure a resident's (Resident #16) request to get out of bed was honored. The facility also failed to ensure showers or complete baths were provided as scheduled (Resident #68). These failures affected 2 of 14 residents sampled in areas of choices and activities of daily living. The findings included: This tag is cross referenced to: 1. F 561: Based on record review, observations, resident, and staff interviews the facility failed to honor a resident's (Resident #16) request to get out of bed to attend a scheduled activity for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for choices. 2. F 677: Based on observations, record review, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide bathing as scheduled for 1 of 9 residents dependent on staff for activities of daily living (Resident #68). Review of the nursing staff scheduled from 06/18/22 through 06/24/22 revealed during first and second shifts there were assignments with one Nurse Aide (NA) on the hall for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to label and store personal items in 2 of 6 shared bathrooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) and maintain packaged terminal air conditioners (PTACs) in good repair in 6 of 15 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]). These failures occurred on 1 of 4 halls (400 hall) reviewed for home-like environment. Findings included: 1. (a). An observation of the shared bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 04/27/25 at 10:52 AM revealed a plastic basket containing an unlabeled toothbrush sitting on the side of the sink. Additional observations of the shared bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 04/28/25 at 3:20 PM, on 04/29/25 at 11:05 AM, on 04/30/24 at 2:14 PM, and on 05/01/25 at 11:24 AM revealed a plastic basket containing an unlabeled toothbrush sitting on the side of the sink. (b). An observation of the shared bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 04/27/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-02-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff, Responsible Party (RP), and Medical Director interviews the facility failed to notify the Responsible Party of a new diagnosis of pneumonia for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for notification of change (Resident #1). Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility 09/27/23 with diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure) and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Review of Resident #1's Physician orders revealed an order dated 01/25/24 for a chest x-ray due to cough. Resident #1's chest x-ray result dated 01/28/24 revealed Resident #1 had left lower lobe airspace disease (when air spaces are filled with fluid or pus) which could be related to pneumonia or atelectasis (collapse of an area of the lung). A review of Resident #1's medical record revealed there was no documentation that the Responsible Party (RP) was notified of her diagnosis of pneumonia on 01/28/24. An interview with the Unit Manager on 02/26/24 at 5:46 PM revealed she often worked as a floor nurse, and she cared for Resident #1 on 01/28/24 (she could not recall the exact time she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-06-24 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to honor food preferences for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed (Resident #51). This failure had the potential to affect all residents. Findings included: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #51 was cognitively intact and required set-up help only with meals. During an interview on 06/21/22 at 9:30 AM, Resident #51 stated she often received food items she did not like with her meals, such as cucumbers and tomatoes. Resident #51 explained she had discussed her dislikes with the Dietary Manager (DM) on several occasions in the past; however, she still continued to receive food she did not like with certain meals. Review of Resident #51's dietary preferences provided by the DM on 06/22/22 at 2:03 PM revealed tomatoes were listed as a dislike. Cucumbers were not listed as a dislike. An observation of the lunch meal on 06/23/22 at 12:21 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$189,174 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $13,405 — penalty dated 2026-05-12
  • $13,405 — penalty dated 2026-05-12
  • $162,364 — penalty dated 2023-12-28
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-15 for 26 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVARDIS HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Ashland Nursing And RehabilitationAshland, VA 1 of 5Augusta Nursing and RehabilitationFishersville, VA 1 of 5Courtyard Health And RehabilitationMcComb, MS 1 of 5Emerald Ridge Health and RehabilitationAsheville, NC 1 of 5Ghent Health and RehabilitationNorfolk, VA 1 of 5Grand Trace Health And RehabilitationNatchez, MS 1 of 5Hibriten Mountain Nursing and RehabilitationLenoir, NC 1 of 5Highfield Nursing and RehabilitationCary, NC 1 of 5Kings Daughters Community Health & RehabStaunton, VA 1 of 5Middleton Oaks Health And RehabilitationWinona, MS 1 of 5Newport News Nursing & RehabNewport News, VA 1 of 5Pennknoll VillageEverett, PA 1 of 5The Oaks Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMeridian, MS 1 of 5Wellington Rehabilitation and HealthcareKnightdale, NC 1 of 5Westwood Health and RehabilitationArchdale, NC 1 of 5Woodstock Valley Health and RehabilitationWoodstock, VA 2 of 5Clay County Health and RehabilitationHayesville, NC 2 of 5Crown Haven Health and RehabilitationCharlotte, NC 2 of 5Kannapolis Health and RehabilitationKannapolis, NC 2 of 5Manor At Penn Village, TheSelinsgrove, PA 2 of 5Manor At St Luke Village,theHazleton, PA 2 of 5Pavilion At St Luke Village, TheHazleton, PA 2 of 5Pheasant Ridge Nursing and RehabilitationRoanoke, VA 2 of 5Valley View Care and RehabilitationAndrews, NC 2 of 5Walnut Cove Health and RehabilitationWalnut Cove, NC 2 of 5Wilora Lake HealthcareCharlotte, NC 2 of 5Windsor Grove Health and RehabilitationWindsor, VA 3 of 5Forrest Oakes HealthcareAlbemarle, NC 3 of 5Hilltop Manor Health And Rehabilitation CenterUnion, MS 3 of 5Locust Grove Retirement VillageMifflin, PA 3 of 5Skyline Nursing & RehabilitationFloyd, VA 4 of 5Jamestown Health and RehabilitationWilliamsburg, VA 4 of 5Oak Grove HealthcareRutherfordton, NC 4 of 5Willowbrook Rehabilitation and CareYadkinville, NC 5 of 5Cardinal Healthcare and RehabilitationLincolnton, NC 5 of 5Grayson Health and RehabilitationIndependence, VANot rated (Special Focus)Starkville Manor Health Care And Rehabilitation CeStarkville, MS

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ARDEN PARENTCO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2025
NCOP HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2025
NU C II IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2025
NU C IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2025
SCR HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2025
SNF CARE CENTERS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2025
ZENITH HOLDCO II LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2025
ZENITH HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 06/01/2025
CSE ARDEN LPOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
HOBACK, TIFFANYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
SEMONES, BRANDIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
SNF MGR LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/23/2025
CARSON, BRIANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
DAVIS, NITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2025
JONES, TEQUILLAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
PAYNE, PATRICKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/04/2025
TURBETT, TIMOTHYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$515K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 7%Other / private 15%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $515K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$301per resident / day
operating cost
$9,137per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$329per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the North Carolina Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in North Carolina
$9,733/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,798/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,496/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 345477. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next