No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Kings Daughters Community Health & Rehab

1410 North Augusta Street, Staunton, VA 24401 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 117 certified beds · (540) 886-6233 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)5 immediate-jeopardy citations$94,940 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent May 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (83) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $94,940 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-15)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Dhara Shah<0.1 mi
1412 N Augusta St · (540) 885-0006 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
42 Lambert St #311 · (540) 886-3433 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion0.3 mi
600 N Coalter St · (540) 887-2625 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1 Churchville Ave · (540) 332-3990 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.4%14.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight13.5%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.0%1.6%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms17.1%18.7%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.0%3.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.3%15.6%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.4%20.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.6%4.7%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.0%21.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.0%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.0%73.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.9%22.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.8%11.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.481.521.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.411.481.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 249 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.5%CMS range 45.0–56.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 7.8–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge70.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge64.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.7%CMS range 5.6–12.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.911.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
1.18
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.67
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
59.6%
Total nursing turnover
100.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 91.0 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.67 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.80 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2023-02-02)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2021-04-15)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

83 citations, most serious first. The 22 most serious are shown; the remaining 61 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, resident interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect residents from neglect. The facility failed to ensure licensed nursing services were available on the [NAME] Wing nursing unit from approximately 7:47 p.m. on 1/31/26 until 7:00 a.m. on 2/1/26. During this period, 39 residents were without access to licensed nursing assessment, medication administration, monitoring, physician notification, and nursing intervention. As a result, Resident #6 (R6), Resident #7 (R7), and Resident #8 (R8) experienced untreated pain, delayed or missed medications, anxiety, insomnia, and psychosocial distress. This deficient practice constituted neglect and resulted in Immediate Jeopardy. Following validation of corrective actions, the Immediate Jeopardy was removed and the deficiency remained cited at Level 2, Pattern noncompliance. The findings included:The facility neglected residents by failing to ensure the availability of licensed nursing services for approximately 12 hours on the [NAME] Wing nursing unit. No licensed nurse was available to administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, and facility documentation reviews, the facility staff failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident affecting 39 residents on the [NAME] Wing. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurse coverage on the west wing, resulting in one of the three nursing units operating without a licensed nurse available to administer medications or provide nursing oversight for approximately 12 hours. This deficient practice resulted in the identification of immediate jeopardy (IJ), and subsequent substandard care. Following the removal of the IJ, the scope and severity was lowered to a level 3 widespread noncompliance. The findings included: The facility failed to provide sufficient licensed nursing staff to meet resident needs when the [NAME] Wing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespread
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, resident interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to prevent further potential abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, while investigations were in progress, and the facility staff lacked the knowledge of the need to protect the resident if abuse is reported and/or witnessed. The facility conducted inadequate investigations and removed protective measures that were implemented following the allegation prior to a conclusion being reached regarding the abuse allegations, which had the potential to expose residents on 3 of 3 nursing units to abuse. Immediate Jeopardy and substandard quality of care were identified. The findings included: The facility staff failed to have credible evidence of thorough investigations being conducted, and that measures were being taken to protect residents during the investigation process, permitting the alleged perpetrators to return to work prior to the conclusion of the investigation being determined. On 3/19/24 - 3/21/24, a review of a sample of abuse allegations investigated by the facility was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2024-04-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement interventions to ensure that 4 residents (Resident #14, Resident #13, Resident #3, and Resident #12), in a survey sample of 48 residents, maintained an acceptable parameter of nutritional status and as a result, all 4 experienced insidious, severe weight loss that was unplanned resulting in immediate jeopardy being identified. The findings included: On 3/19/24 at approximately 12:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Registered Dietician (RD), who was in the dining room. The RD reported that he comes weekly and is at the facility for 8 hours. The RD said, It's not much weight loss in this building, we have one resident losing weight, but they refuse to eat and take supplements. 1. For resident #14 (R14), who lost 46.6 pounds since May 2023, the facility staff failed to identify and take measures to address the weight loss, which constituted harm. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2019-06-24 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to attempt appropriate alternatives prior to the use of side/bed rails, failed to assess residents for risk of entrapment prior to use, failed to review the risks/benefits of side/bed rails with the resident and/or resident representative and failed to obtain informed consent prior to use, failed to have a system in place to ensure residents beds were appropriate for the resident's size and weight, and failed to have a system in place for assessment and ongoing monitoring/supervision of side/bed rails in use. One resident (Resident #1) in the survey sample was identified as having his legs entrapped in the side/bed rails. Five additional residents (Resident #46, #89, #18, #80, and #97) were identified at risk for falls, had bed alarms due to attempts to get out of bed, and had side/bed rails in use. These six residents did not have attempted alternatives prior to the use of side/bed rails,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · H2026-05-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation reviews the facility staff failed to ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. This deficient practice resulted in harm for three residents, Resident #6 (R6), Resident #7 (R7), and Resident #8 (R8) out of a survey sample of nine residents. The findings included:The facility staff failed to have a licensed nurse on the west wing for approximately 12 hours to assess, monitor and to administer pain medications to the residents for pain management, resulting in untreated pain for Resident #6 (R6), Resident #7 (R7), and Resident #8 (R8), which was harm. 5/12/26 at 4:30 pm, a telephone interview was conducted with licensed practical nurse, LPN3. LPN3 stated that no nurse came in to the facility that night and there was no nurse on west wing nursing unit medication cart until the nurse from first shift came in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, staff interviews, resident interview, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure adequate interventions were implemented and followed to prevent the development and or worsening of pressure ulcers for one resident, resident #2 (R2) out of a survey sample of nine residents This failure resulted in harm as R2 developed in house acquired pressure ulcers. The findings include: The facility failed to provide preventative skin interventions for R2 who was at moderate risk for pressure ulcer development, which resulted in the resident developing an in-house acquired pressure ulcer, which constituted harm. On 5/12/26, a clinical record review was conducted. During the review, the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk, dated 10/3/2025, which was R2's admission date was reviewed. R2's score was 13 which is category of moderate risk for developing pressure ulcers. A skilled nursing note dated 10/4/25 had R2's skin was warm and dry with no skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident which resulted in harm to several residents, who had untreated pain, residing on one unit out of three units. The findings includedThe facility administration failed to ensure a licensed nurse was present on an entire unit for approximately a 12-hour period to administer scheduled medications, assess for changes in condition, communicate with the doctor, receive new orders, initiate life-saving measures in the event of an emergency, and provide any skilled nursing care such as enteral feedings, intravenous medications and fluid management, dialysis port monitoring, etc. This failure to have a nurse available on the unit had the potential to result in harm to all residents on the unit. On 5/12/26 at 4:46 pm, an interview was conducted with the director of nursing, DON. She stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, facility documentation review, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse and neglect from staff, for two residents (Resident #1 & Resident #44) in a survey sample of 48 residents, which resulted in harm for both residents. The findings included: 1. The facility staff physically abused R1 and neglected to leave the resident with a means to call for assistance by taking the call bell away from the resident, which constituted harm. Resident #1 (R1) had diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, adult failure to thrive, and generalized muscle weakness. The most current minimum data set (MDS - assessment tool) was a quarterly assessment, dated 9/29/23, which assessed R1 with moderate cognitive impairment. Review of R1's closed clinical record, the MDS dated [DATE] documented R1 required extensive assistance transferring from bed to wheelchair. R1's care plan initiated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, resident interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review it was determined that the facility staff failed to identify pressure wounds until they were an advanced stage for two residents (Resident #4, R4 and Resident #17, R17) in a survey sample of four residents reviewed for pressure wounds. This constitutes harm for both residents. The findings included: 1. For R4, the facility staff failed to identify a pressure ulcer until it was an advanced stage, with necrotic tissue that required surgical debridement at the time of discovery, which was harm. R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for R4 included but were not limited to cerebral infarction, unspecified, dysphagia, epilepsy, hyperlipidemia, and muscle weakness. R4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment protocol, MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/30/23 coded R4 with a BIMS of three which indicates severe cognitive impairment. In addition, the MDS coded R4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-04-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide incontinence care for one resident (Resident #44), in a survey sample of 48 residents, resulting in psychosocial harm. The findings included: For Resident #44 (R44) the facility staff failed to provide incontinence care for an entire 24 hour time period from 4/11/24 through 4/12/24, resulting in psychosocial harm. R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for R44 included but were not limited to multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, history of falling and abnormal posture. R44 OSA (optional state assessment) Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment protocol) with an Assessment Reference Date of 3/19/2024 coded R44 with a BIMS of 13, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. On 4/16/24 at 1:10 p.m. a phone interview was conducted with a certified nursing assistant (CNA #18, CNA18). CNA18 stated, [R44's name redacted]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to have sufficient nursing staff to meet the resident care needs on 2 of 3 nursing units, which affected many residents and resulted in psychological harm for one resident (Resident #44). The findings included: 1. For Resident #44 (R44), the facility staff failed to provide incontinence care for an extended period of time due to insufficient staffing, which resulted in psychological harm for the resident. R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for R44 included but were not limited to multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, history of falling, and abnormal posture. R44's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), with an Assessment Reference Date of 3/19/2024, coded R44 with a BIMS of 13 out of 15, which indicated R44 was cognitively intact for daily decision making. On the afternoon of 4/16/24, it was observed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — widespread
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation reviews, the facility staff failed to ensure quality nursing care was provided to meet resident needs on one of three nursing units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurse coverage on the west wing nursing unit, resulting in no licensed nurse being available to administer medications, assess residents, respond to change in condition, provide treatments, or ensure resident safety. This deficient practice resulted in harm to residents #6, 7, and 8. The findings included:The facility staff failed to follow accepted standards of nursing practice by failing to ensure a licensed nurse was present on the unit, residents missed medications, lack of assessment for changes in condition, delayed response to emergencies, uncontrolled pain, medication errors, and lack of appropriate clinical oversight. This failure resulted in harm to Resident #6, 7, and 8. On 5/12/26 at 2:30 pm, an interview was conducted with LPN2, unit manager of west wing nursing unit. She said, I shouldn't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide residents with a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment for one of ten residents (Resident #10). The findings included:The facility staff failed to follow infection prevention and control practices when staff wore gloves in the hallway and Resident #10's foley catheter drainage bag was lying on the floor with an over bed table sitting on top of the foley bag.On 5/11/26 at 12:00 pm, during the initial tour of the nursing units of the facility it was observed on the east wing nursing unit several staff members wearing gloves in the hallway and Resident #10's foley catheter drainage bag on the floor with a over-bed table sitting on top of the foley bag. The foley bag was observed to be excessively full.On 5/11/26 at 12:08 pm, a certified nursing assistant, CNA (CNA1) was interviewed. CNA1 observed the foley drainage bag on the floor lying under the over bed table. CNA1 said, urine bags should be on the bed frame…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to notify the physician when ordered laboratory tests were not obtained as prescribed for one resident, Resident #102(R102) out of a survey sample of eight residents. The findings included:The facility staff failed to notify the physician in a timely manner that ordered laboratory tests were not obtained for Resident #102. On 6/29/26, a clinical record review was conducted. Review of the clinical record revealed that on 6/25/26, laboratory tests, including a magnesium level, CBC (complete blood count), and CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel), were ordered but were not obtained. The laboratory tests were subsequently reordered for 6/26/26, 6/27/26, 6/28-6/29/26, and again for 6/30/26. Progress note documentation dated 6/26/26 indicated that the laboratory tests were not obtained on 6/25/26 and that the order was updated to populate on the night shift. A progress note dated 6/27/26 documented that the laboratory technician attempted to obtain the blood specimens twice without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation reviews the facility staff failed to follow the facility's abuse, neglect, and exploitation policy after allegation of neglect were reported, resulting in residents not being adequately protected form potential ongoing harm. The findings included:The facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy after an allegation of neglect was reported.5/12/26 at 4:30 pm, a telephone interview was conducted with licensed practical nurse, LPN3. The interview was conducted in reference for a incident that happened on 1/31/26 on the west wing nursing unit. During the interview , LPN3 stated that she never observed LPN2 enter any resident rooms. LPN3 stated she was asked to come in and work as an aide that evening. LPN3 stated that she agreed to working as an aide but she would not take a medication cart that evening. LPN3 stated she only signed up for aide duties.LPN3 stated the nurse that was suppose to relieve LPN2 called out at the last minute, so there was no relief nurse that took report,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, and facility documentation reviews the facility staff failed to follow their abuse policy and report an allegation of neglect. The findings included:The facility staff failed to report an allegation of neglect.5/12/26 at 4:30 pm, a telephone interview was conducted with licensed practical nurse, LPN3. The interview was conducted in reference for a incident that happened on 1/31/26 on the west wing nursing unit. LPN3 stated the nurse that was suppose to relieve LPN2 called out at the last minute, so there was no relief nurse that took report, counted the narcotics or took the medication cart keys. LPN3 stated she didn't feel comfortable taking the medication cart when LPN2 did not give her report or count the narcotics with her prior to leaving the facility. LPN3 stated that no nurse came in to the facility that night and there was no nurse on west wing nursing unit medication cart until the nurse from first shift came in the following morning at 7:00 a.m. On 5/13/26 at 8:45 am, an interview was conducted with LPN5. Neglect was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to investigate an allegation of neglect that was reported, resulting in residents not being adequately protected from potential ongoing harm. The findings included:The facility staff failed to investigate an allegation of neglect that occurred at the facility.On 5/12/26 at 2:30 pm, an interview was conducted with LPN2. During the interview LPN2 was questioned about the incident that happened on 1/31/26. She stated this was the first weekend she had worked at the facility. She stated she was hired as the unit manager of the west wing. She stated that she did leave early on the 31st. LPN2 stated that she should not have left the medication cart without giving a report to a relief nurse or counting off the narcotics with someone. She stated that she told a nurse as she was leaving the facility that she wrote down report on the report sheet and counted against herself. She told the nurse if any discrepancies with the narcotic count to give her a call. LPN2 stated she should not have left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to complete required post-fall assessments and neurological checks following an unwitnessed fall for one resident, Resident #102 out of a survey sample of eight residents. The findings included:The facility staff failed to complete post-fall assessments and neurological checks after an unwitnessed fall. On 6/29/26, a clinical record review was conducted. A progress note dated 6/28/26 at 2:14 pm was written by a licensed practical nurse, LPN3 and read, Resident called call bell at 1300 from bathroom. This writer answered. Observed resi [resident] laying across toilet. Stated stood up and fell. Noted scratch to left arm about 5 inch long. Cleaned with wound cleaner and applied dressing. Educated resi [resident] to use call bell . All r/p [responsible party] made aware. No c/o [complaint] pain at this time. A progress note was reviewed that was written by the Director of Nursing dated 6/29/26 at 10:07 am, and read, IDT [interdisciplinary team] met to review recent incident.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan for two residents, Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2(R2), out of a survey sample of nine residents.The findings included #1. The facility staff failed to implement wound interventions and precautions for R1 to the care plan. On 5/13/26, a clinical record review was conducted. During the review a physician order was reviewed. R1 was admitted on [DATE]. An order for a pressure-reducing mattress was noted on 12/9/24 and a pressure-reducing cushion to wheelchair was noted on 12/9/24. On 5/13/26, a clinical record review was conducted. A review was conducted on R1's care plan. Staff failed to implement the pressure reducing mattress and pressure reducing cushion to wheelchair on the care plan. On 5/14/26, a clinical review of R1's Braden Scale was conducted. R1's score was a 16 on admission which according to Braden Scale for Predicting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation reviews the facility staff failed to ensure that professional standards of quality care were met for one resident, Resident #5 out of a survey sample of nine residents. The findings included:The facility staff failed to ensure that a registered nurse (RN) pronounced the resident's death in accordance with professional standard and facility policy. In addition, there was no physician order or documented authorization to release the resident's body to the funeral home. On [DATE] at 3:45 pm, an interview was conducted with a licensed practical nurse, LPN6, the unit manager on east wing. She said, when a patient becomes unresponsive assess the the scene attempt to get then to respond-obtain vitals, checking pulse, check code status, if a DNR [do not resuscitate] no pulse no blood pressure then do nothing call my DON because I am a LPN and need RN to pronounce. Initiate CPR [cardiopulmonary resuscitation] if a full code. LPN6 then stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility documentation review, and staff interview the facility staff failed to ensure complete nurse staffing information was available for review. The findings included:The facility staff failed to provide the staff postings for the last two weeks of January that was requested for review.On 5/11/26 at 2:00 pm, a request was made for the staff posting for the month of January 2026; however, while reviewing the staff postings there were several days that was not provided. A second request was made for the staffing post for for the last week of January 2026 which would have been the days of the 24th through the 31st. I was provided with the assignment sheets on the units for the 25th and 31st of January and then the as worked schedule for the 25th, 29th, 30th and the 31st of January. Then a 3rd request was made for the staff posting and the social worker director, other staff #3, (OS3) provided the 25th, 29th - 31st of January copies of the staff information that is submitted for the payroll based journal report. On 5/12/26 at 3.45 pm, an interviewed was conducted with OS3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 61 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, resident interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure residents were provided pharmaceutical services that included administration of medications to meet the needs of each resident. The findings included:The facility staff failed to have a licensed nurse on the medication cart to administer medications for approximately 12 hours on 1/31/26.On 5/12/26 at 4:30 pm, an interview was conducted with a licensed practical nurse, LPN3. During the interview, LPN3 stated that LPN2 apparently passed the medications on the west wing unit A hall but didn't pass any medication on the b hall. She stated that some of the residents on the b hall were complaining and went to the east wing unit to see if the nurse on that unit could give them medications and she told them she didn't have keys to their medication cart and she gave the residents grievance forms to fill out with their concerns. LPN3 also stated that LPN 2 was suppose to call her and let her know who received medications and who did not get their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0917 — isolated
    Make sure each resident has 1) at least one window to the outside in a room; 2) a room at or above ground level; 3) adequate bedding; 4) furniture that meets the resident's needs; or 5) adequate closet space.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure resident furnishings and equipment were maintained in good repair and safe condition for one resident, Resident #7 (R7) out of a survey sample of nine residents. The findings included:The facility staff failed to ensure that the resident's furniture was safe and functional.On 5/13/26 at 11:15 am, an observation was made of R7 in her room holding the facing of a dresser drawer after the drawer had fallen apart. The resident's belongings were observed lying on the floor. While the surveyor was present in the room the maintenance assistant entered to repair the wrong piece of furniture and had to be redirected to the broken dresser drawer. The maintenance assistant picked up the broken wood, stated someone would be in to sweep the floor, and reported the drawer would be fixed. R7 reported that the dresser drawer facing had struck her knee when the drawer fell apart, and the concern was reported to nursing staff.On 5/13/26 at 11:15 am, an interview was conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-17 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours per day on three of seventeen days in December 2025 (12/7/25, 12/13/25 and 12/14/25).The findings include:On 12/17/25 at 10:25 a.m., the facility's as-worked nursing schedule for December 2025 was reviewed. The as-worked schedule documented no RN work hours on 12/7/25, 12/13/25 or 12/14/25.On 12/17/25 at 10:30 a.m., the scheduler (other staff #6) was interviewed about the days listed in December 2025 without RN coverage. The scheduler stated that no RNs worked on 12/7/25, 12/13/25 or 12/14/25 as she had no RN available to work. The scheduler stated the DON was on-call but that no RN actually worked on those dates.On 12/17/25 at 10:50 a.m., the director of nursing (DON) was interviewed about no RN coverage on the dates listed above. The DON stated the RN that typically worked weekends was out of medical leave on those dates and not available to work. The DON stated she had an abundance of licensed practical nurses but that she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for medication administration for four of eleven residents in the survey sample (Residents #1, #4, #7 and #8).The findings include: 1. Registered nurse (RN) #1 administered the medication methadone 5 mg (milligrams) to Resident #4 when the physician's order required a 2.5 mg dose.Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included osteoarthritis, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, liver cirrhosis, mood disorder, atrial fibrillation, chronic pain and congestive heart failure. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #4 with moderately impaired cognitive skills.Review of Resident #5's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 6/28/24 for methadone 5 mg (milligrams) at each bedtime for treatment of chronic pain. This order was discontinued on 5/9/25 with a physician's order entered for methadone 5.0 mg, with instructions to give 1/2 tab (2.5 mg) at each bedtime for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of care during medication administration for one of eleven residents (Resident #11).The findings include:A medication pass observation was conducted on 12/16/25 at 8:25 a.m. with licensed practical nurse (LPN #2) administering medications to Resident #11. Among medications administered to Resident #11 was one inhalation of Breo Ellipta (fluticasone furoate-vilanterol) aerosol powder 100-125 micrograms/actuation (mcg/act). After Resident #11 inhaled the medication from the device, LPN #2 administered the other prescribed oral medications. LPN #2 provided prompt or request for Resident #11 to rinse the mouth after inhaling the Breo Ellipta medication.Resident #11's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 7/10/25 for Breo Ellipta inhalation aerosol powder with breath activated device, 100-25 mcg/act with instructions to inhale one puff daily for treatment of COPD (chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for one of eleven residents in the survey sample (Resident #5).The findings include:Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder, hypertension, insomnia, protein-calorie nutrition and dysphagia. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #5 as cognitively intact.Resident #5's clinical record documented physician orders for treatment of head lice starting on 8/17/25 that included RID Super Max 5-in-1 kit, nit combing each day and contact precautions. The lice treatment was initiated on 8/17/25 with treatment/precautions discontinued on 8/25/25.Resident #5's clinical record included no notes regarding the assessment of head lice, any associated symptoms or notification to the provider.On 12/17/25 at 9:45 a.m., the licensed practical nurse infection preventionist (LPN #1) was interviewed about documentation in Resident #5's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices during a medication pass on one of two units (East unit).The findings include: A medication pass observation was conducted on 12/16/25 at 8:45 a.m. with licensed practical nurse (LPN #3) administering medications to an East unit resident (Resident #11). LPN #3 used hand sanitizer prior to the start of the medication pass. LPN #3 removed oral medications for the resident that included aspirin, simethicone, omeprazole, and vitamin D from supply bottles, touching/handling the tablets/pills with her bare fingers/hands prior to placement in the medicine cup. LPN #3 then administered the oral medications to Resident #11.On 12/16/25 at 8:50 a.m., LPN #3 was interviewed about touching the medications with bare fingers/hands. LPN #3 stated that directly touching the tablets/pills was probably not a good habit.On 12/16/25 at 10:35 a.m., the East unit manager (LPN #6) was interviewed about LPN #3 directly touching pills/tablets during the medication pass…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure medication was available for administration for one of 26 residents, Resident #124, during the medication pass and pour observation. The findings include: During a medication pass and pour observation, conducted on 7/24/24 at 8:00 AM, Resident #124 (R124) was scheduled to receive the medication telmisartan 40 MG. License practical nurse (LPN #3) looked into the medication cart and verbalized that the telmisartan was not available to give. LPN #3 then looked for the medication in the medication room, indicated that the medication was not on hand, called the pharmacy to reorder the medication, and then verbalized that the telmisartan would be sent later in the day. On 7/24/24 at 9:15 AM, the director of nursing (DON) verbalized that the physician had been notified and an order was received to hold the telmisartan and give when the medication arrived from the pharmacy. The physician's order for R124's telmisartan was reviewed and documented: Telmisartan 40 MG Tablet one time a day for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-17 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to post in a readily accessible place, inspection reports with a plan of corrections in effect, with respect to any surveys conducted during the past 3 years. The facility's non-compliance has the potential to impact all 112 Residents and their family's ability to make informed decisions with knowledge of the facility's regulatory compliance history. The findings included: The facility staff failed to have readily accessible to Residents and family members, the survey results with any plan of correction in effect for the surveys conducted for the past 3 preceding years. On 3/20/24 at approximately 11 a.m., the survey team observed the facility's survey results which were in the lobby. There was a typed document that read, Required to be retained for 18 months (includes full survey cycle). Observation of the posted survey results revealed that it contained the survey report from a standard survey conducted 1/31/23-2/2/23. The survey team reviewed the state survey agency website and determined that the facility had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to respond to resident council grievances, which had the potential to affect many residents on 3 of 3 nursing units. The findings included: 1. The resident council made a request for a monthly resident choice meal that was not responded to for a year. On 3/19/24-3/20/24, the resident council minutes for the past year were reviewed. It was noted that each month from January 2023-December 2023, the residents continued to verbalize that the resident choice meal they had selected had not been honored. The January 2023, minutes read, still wants what they didn't get. This notation went on until May 2023, when it was noted, this concern was resolved. However, in July, it was again noted that the residents didn't receive their resident choice meal. In October it was noted that the residents selected a meal which included fried chicken, potato salad, macaroni and cheese and lemon meringue pie. On 3/19/24-3/20/24, interviews were conducted with multiple residents, which included the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to report allegations of abuse, neglect, and mistreatment to the required regulatory agencies, which involved 26 resident allegations of abuse and/or mistreatment, in a sample of 33 allegations reviewed. The findings included: In response to concerns that allegations of abuse/neglect/mistreatment were not being thoroughly investigated and the apparent lack of resident protection during the investigation of the allegations, the facility was notified that immediate jeopardy had been identified. While implementing the removal plan, the facility conducted resident interviews, which resulted in 26 additional investigations being initiated, which required reporting to the state survey agency and adult protective services. The facility documentation revealed that the residents who reported allegations of abuse, neglect and/or mistreatment included Resident #9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 24, 27, 31, 39, 41, 44, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, and 60. On 4/2/24, during a review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for numerous residents residing on 2 of 3 nursing units. The findings included: The facility staff failed to respond to call bells in a timely manner for residents requesting assistance on 2 of 3 nursing units. On 3/19/24 at 3:38 PM, resident #7 (R7) was interviewed regarding staff response to call bells. R7 recalled waiting for assistance in the bathroom so long her leg went numb. On 3/19/24 at 3:56 PM, resident #9 (R9) was interviewed and stated that response time isn't good, sometimes I have to wait 40-45 minutes more than I should. R9 also stated the day prior she sat on the toilet for an hour waiting for a roll of toilet paper. On 3/20/24 at 10:30 AM, surveyor entered residents room finding the call bell lying on the floor under the bed, the resident's roommate pushed the bell for assistance. Licensed practical nurse #4 (LPN #4), who was the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure 3 Residents (Resident #36, #35, and #31) who received dialysis services received care and treatment consistent with professional standards of practice, in a survey sample of 3 residents reviewed for dialysis services. The findings included: 1. For Resident #36, the facility staff failed to monitor the resident's vital signs before and after dialysis treatments and observe the dialysis access site for complications. On 3/26/24, R36's clinical record was reviewed. This review revealed an order that indicated R36 was to go to dialysis at an off-site location on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday of each week. The progress notes revealed no documentation of any concerns or issues with regards to the dialysis, resident's condition, access site, etc. On 3/26/24 at approximately 10:45 a.m., R36 was visited in their room. R36 reported that the facility sends a book back and forth to dialysis as a means for the two facilities to communicate with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to prepare and serve meals in accordance with the menu, which had the potential to affect residents on 3 of 3 nursing units. The findings included: The facility staff failed to prepare foods in accordance with the menu and failed to post the correct menus for residents to view. On 3/19/24 at 11:57 a.m. an observation was conducted in the kitchen. The serving tray line in the kitchen did not have the alternate meal prepared that was posted on the menu board and listed on the menu. The alternate meal, according to the menu was supposed to be breaded fish on a bun, seasoned rice, and sliced carrots, which was not cooked and not available for residents. On 3/19/24 at 12:00- 1:20 p.m., observations of the resident's meals served was observed on 2 of the 3 nursing units and in the main dining room. It was noted that residents were served a plain cheeseburger with tater tots. According to the menu there was supposed to be lettuce and tomato for the burgers and a pickle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, resident interviews, and facility documentation review it was determined that staff failed to provide meals based on resident preferences, failed to provide nutritionally equivalent substitutions, and failed to serve foods that accommodate resident allergies, affecting multiple residents residing on 3 of 3 nursing units. The findings included: The facility staff failed to offer alternate foods, honor food preferences and were serving foods that residents had allergies to. On 3/19/24 at 11:57 a.m. an observation was conducted in the kitchen. The serving tray line in the kitchen was observed and it was noted that the alternate meal was not cooked and available for residents. On 3/19/24, the lunch meal service was observed in the dining room. Resident #14 (R14) was observed to not eat any of her meal and said she didn't like what was served. The facility staff did not offer any alternate options and R14 left the dining room having ate nothing. On 3/19/24/at 12:15 p.m. an observation of the lunch meal was conducted. The trays were served to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, resident interviews, and facility documentation review, it was determined the staff failed to provide care and services for therapeutic diets for ten residents (Resident #2- R2, Resident #6- R6, Resident #7- R7, Resident #9-R9, Resident #12-R12, Resident #4-R4, Resident #14- R14, Resident #33- R33, Resident #40- R40 and Resident #36-R36), in a survey sample of 48 residents. The findings included: For R2, R6, R7, R9, R12, R4, R14, R33, R40, and R36, the facility staff failed to provide and serve therapeutic diets in accordance with physician orders. 3/19/24 at 12:15 an observation was conducted of the lunch meal in the dining area for the 300 and 400 unit. During this observation, several residents received the incorrect diets. CNA #5 (CNA5) was in the dining room serving the meal and was unfamiliar with the residents and the diets that were printed on the meal tickets. On 3/19/24 at 12:15 p.m. an observation of Resident #2's (R2) at the lunch meal in the dining area was conducted. Observed a meal ticket at R2's meal setting and printed on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure the facility staff provided meals daily at regular times having affected residents on 3 of 3 nursing units. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure that residents were served meals daily at regular times. On 3/19/24, during an entrance conference held with the facility administrator, the facility staff were asked to provide a listing of mealtimes. The facility submitted mealtimes as breakfast being at 8 a.m., lunch at 12 noon, and dinner at 5 p.m. On 3/19/24, during an observation of the meal service, it was noted that the second cart of meal trays for the east wing arrived at the unit at 12:38 p.m. The last resident on the west wing was served their lunch meal at 1:11 p.m. On 3/19/24 and 3/20/24, during observations of the kitchen tray line it was noted that the dietary staff maintained a log of when the meal trays were delivered to the units. On 3/20/24, the logs were reviewed and revealed the following: breakfast was served as early as 7:40 a.m., and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews and facility document it was determined that the staff failed to prepare and store food in a safe and sanitary manner with regards to food temperatures on the service line and to keep holding temperatures adequate for serving the food to residents, having the potential to affect many residents on 3 of 3 nursing units. The findings included: The facility staff failed to check the internal temperatures of the food prior to plating the food and failed to hold the food at a safe temperature when serving the food to residents. On 3/19/24 at 11:57 a.m. an observation was conducted in the kitchen. The temperature logs were observed blank for that meal and the dietary manager filled in the log while checking temperatures of the food upon request of the surveyor. The food was being plated on the service line prior to temperatures being obtained of the food to ensure adequate cooking and holding temperature to prevent the grown of food borne illnesses. On 3/19/24 at 1:12 p.m. a test tray observation was conducted. The dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, clinical record reviews and facility documentation reviews, the facility staff failed to provide effective administration regarding resident's right to be free from abuse, neglect and exploitation and the protection of residents and insidious weight loss, resulting in the identification of two immediate jeopardy situations and substandard quality of care being identified, which had the potential to affect multiple residents on all 3 of the nursing units. The findings included: 1. The facility administrator, who was the abuse coordinator, failed to effectively administer the facility to ensure that through investigations were taken and measures implemented to ensure residents were free from abuse and/or retaliation during an investigation. On 3/19/24-3/20/24, a review was conducted of a sample of resident allegations of abuse/neglect and/or mistreatment. This review revealed that on 5 occasions, the facility staff member named as the alleged perpetrator was permitted to return to work prior to the conclusion of an investigation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain an effective quality assurance program with regards to maintain ongoing compliance with food and nutrition services, which resulted in immediate jeopardy being identified, which had the potential to affect many residents on three of three nursing units. The findings included: The facility staff failed to maintain an effective quality assurance program to maintain ongoing compliance and address concerns with regards to food and nutrition services within the facility, which had previously been identified and communicated as an on-going area of concern by residents. On 3/20/24, the survey team leader reviewed the survey results from the abbreviated survey conducted November 27, 2023- November 29, 2023. It was noted that during that survey the facility was identified to not be in compliance and deficient practice was cited at F800, for failure to ensure accurate meal tickets, F804 for failure to provide appetizing food with palatable temperatures, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-17 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee consisting of the minimum members being present for 4 of 6 meetings reviewed for compliance. The findings included: For 4 of 6 quality assurance meetings held, the facility failed to ensure the administrator and infection preventionist were a part of the committee in attendance as required and the required number of additional staff were present. On 3/22/24, at approximately 9 a.m., the facility administration was notified that an extended survey was being conducted and the quality assurance program would be reviewed. The facility was asked to provide a copy of the sign-in sheets from the last 6 meetings held and a listing of topic discussed, since the actual quality assurance meeting minutes and documents are protected and unable to be reviewed by the survey team. On 3/22/24, the facility staff provided documents were reviewed and it noted the following: The meeting held on 6/2/23, did not include the facility's assigned infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure residents receive services with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences affecting 9 residents (Resident #21, 3, 10, 24, 25, 26, 19, 28, and 38) on 2 of 3 nursing units. The findings included: For Resident #21, 3, 10, 24, 25, 26, 19, 28, and 38, the facility staff failed to ensure call bells were accessible and they would have a means to notify staff if they needed something. On 3/19/24 at 12:19 PM, during a tour of the facility multiple call bells were observed to be out of the residents reach. Resident #21 (R21) was observed to be sleeping in a wheelchair and the call light was lying on the bed out of reach of the resident. Resident #3 (R3) who had a pancake call bell was observed lying in the bed with the call bell behind the headboard, out of reach. Resident # 10 (R10) was observed sitting in bed with the call bell lying on the floor behind the headboard. Resident #24 (R24) was observed lying in bed with the call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to uphold resident rights for visitation for two residents (Resident #14, R14 and Resident #15, R15) of 48 residents. The findings included: The facility staff would not allow R14 and R15 to visit one another in private in R14's room. R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for R14 included but not limited to anxiety disorder, hypokalemia, spinal stenosis, lymphedema, and atrial fibrillation. R14 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment protocol) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/6/24 coded R14 with a BIMS of 15 and has no cognitive impairment. R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for R15 included but not limited to Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, generalized muscle weakness, repeated falls and mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology. R15's Quarterly MDS with an ARD 1/28/24 coded R13 with a BIMS of 13 and has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances involving one resident (Resident #14- R14), in a survey sample of 48 residents. The findings included: For Resident #14 (R14) who filed a grievance about receiving food she had an allergy to, the facility didn't respond to the grievance timely and failed to resolve the concern. Review of the facility grievance log revealed that on 1/14/24, R14 reported a concern that the kitchen keep giving resident fish resident allergic to fish, diet ticket states no fish. The grievance noted that the facility would re-train any employee who needs it. This grievance was noted as being completed on 1/21/24 and noted as resolved. On 3/19/24, during an initial tour of the facility, R14 was heard complaining that she had received fish for supper last night, requested an alternate twice, which was never received, and she went to bed hungry. On the afternoon of 3/19/24, during another interview with R14, the resident reported this is a frequent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and employee record reviews and facility documentation review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy for 2 employees (CNA #12 and CNA #1 ) in a survey sample of 25 staff records reviewed. The findings included: 1. For certified nursing assistant #12 (CNA #12) the facility staff failed to obtain a criminal background check. On 3/19/24 during a review of facility documents it was determined that no criminal background check was obtained for CNA #12 during their employment at the facility. On 3/19/24 at 4:48 PM, other staff #1 (OS#1) who was the human resource manager, was interviewed and confirmed that CNA #12 did not have a criminal background check and therefore was permitted to work providing direct care to residents while the criminal history was unknown. OS#1 stated CNA #12 was hired on 2/10/23 and termed on 7/14/23. Review of the facility policy for Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation effective 11/30/14 stated in part, persons applying for employment with the center will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to accurately code an assessment for two residents (Resident #13- R13, and Resident #3- R3) in a survey sample of 48 residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #13, who had experienced a significant weight loss, the MDS (minimum data set, an assessment) assessment was inaccurately coded with regards to significant weight loss. On 3/20/24-3/21/24, a clinical record review was conducted of R13's chart. This review included but was not limited to, weights, physician orders, MDS assessments and the care plan. The weight records noted that on 1/12/24, R13 had experienced a significant weight loss of 10%, a 25-pound loss since September 12, 2023. On 1/19/24, a quarterly MDS assessment was conducted, which in section K, question K0300. indicated 0. No or unknown for the question loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in last 6 months? 2. For Resident #3 (R3), who had a significant weight loss, the MDS assessment with an ARD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to review and revise care plans of residents following each assessment for 2 Residents (Resident #4 & Resident #3) in a survey sample of 48 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #4 (R4), the nutritional care plan was not reviewed and revised following an assessment, which identified significant weight loss. On 3/20/24-3/21/24, a clinical record review was conducted, which included R4's weights, MDS (minimum data set assessment) and care plan. It was noted that beginning in December 2023, R4 was noted with a significant weight loss of 5.1 % loss within the month. On 1/28/24, R4 was noted with a 6.6 % weight loss within 30 days. On 1/30/24, R4 had a quarterly MDS assessment conducted, which in section K identified that R4 had experienced a significant weight loss. R4's nutritional care plan had been initiated 11/30/21, with a revision of the goal on 8/24/23. All of the nutritional interventions had been initiated in 11/30/21, except one which was implemented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of nursing practice with regards to carrying out physician orders for one resident (Resident #35) (R35) in a survey sample of 48 residents. The findings included: For R35, the facility staff failed to carry out a physician order for a change in medication dosage. On 3/26/24 at approximately 10:15 a.m., R35 was visited in their room. R35 confirmed that their dialysis days were Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays of each week. R35 also confirmed that a book is sent with them to dialysis as a means for the facility and the dialysis clinic to communicate with one another. On 3/26/24 at approximately 10:20 a.m., R35's dialysis book was reviewed. It was noted that on 3/6/24, R35 had labs drawn while at dialysis and noted on the 3/6/24, Dialysis Communication form, Document any pertinent or relevant observations: New order 2 Renvela [also known as Sevelamer] TID [three times a day] with meals per Dr [redacted physician's name]. A copy of the labs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, resident interview and facility documents it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide activity of daily living (ADL) care for three residents (Resident #4, R4, Resident #14, R14, Resident #15, R15) out of 48 residents in the survey sample. The findings included: The facility staff failed to adequately groom the residents and to shower the residents on their scheduled shower days. 1. For Resident #4, who was dependent upon facility staff for care needs, the facility staff failed to shave the resident. On 3/26/24 at 11:45 a.m. an observation was made of Resident #4 (R4). R4 was observed with thick facial hair on the chin and upper lip area. R4 was nonverbal but gave a thumbs up when asked if wanting the facial hair removed. On 3/26/24 at 11:50 a.m. an interview was conducted with CNA #13 (CNA13) (certified nursing assistant). CNA13 verbalized that residents are shaved on their shower days but can be shaved on other days if needed. CNA13 verbalized that all residents can be shaved with a razor unless on blood thinners then an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident who had Alzheimer's dementia had a dementia care plan with interventions to ensure dementia appropriate treatment and services were provided for one resident (Resident #6- R6) in a survey sample of 48 residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #6, who had Alzheimer's, the facility staff failed to develop a dementia care plan to include interventions address the resident's wandering and failed to provide adequate supervision of the resident which resulted in the resident wandering into another resident room and wrapping the call bell cord around their body and wheelchair. On 4/15/24 at 3:54 p.m., upon the surveyor's arrival on the east unit, it was noted that 6 call bells were engaged and going off, which included room [ROOM NUMBER]. It was noted that there was only one CNA (certified nursing assistant) was working the unit and one nurse was assigned to the unit to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure medication was available for administration for one of 26 residents, Resident #124, during the medication pass and pour observation. The findings include: During a medication pass and pour observation, conducted on 7/24/24 at 8:00 AM, Resident #124 (R124) was scheduled to receive the medication telmisartan 40 MG. License practical nurse (LPN #3) looked into the medication cart and verbalized that the telmisartan was not available to give. LPN #3 then looked for the medication in the medication room, indicated that the medication was not on hand, called the pharmacy to reorder the medication, and then verbalized that the telmisartan would be sent later in the day. On 7/24/24 at 9:15 AM, the director of nursing (DON) verbalized that the physician had been notified and an order was received to hold the telmisartan and give when the medication arrived from the pharmacy. The physician's order for R124's telmisartan was reviewed and documented: Telmisartan 40 MG Tablet one time a day for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews and facility documentation review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide appetizing food with palatable temperatures and appearance to residents on one of three units (400 unit). The findings include: On 3/19/24 at 11:57 a.m. an observation was made of the tray line and of the steam table in the kitchen . The temperature log had not been completed prior to the lunch meal being plated. The dietary manager obtained the temperatures during the observation and the temperature for the meal is as follows: Cheeseburgers-162.6, Tater tots-165.7, mashed potatoes-203.3, pureed hamburger 148.6, carrots-169.8. On 3/19/24 at 12:00 p.m. an observation of the lunch time meal in the dining area was performed. The surveyor observed several trays with the cheeseburger bread was not able to be separated to add any condiments to the cheeseburger. The tater tots were lukewarm, and no condiments were provided on the resident's tray to add to the food.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate and complete clinical record for four residents (Resident #14, R14, Resident #15, R15, Resident #17, R17, and Resident #39, R39) in a survey sample of 48 residents. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to accurately document R14's meal intake on the ADL (Activity of daily living) sheet in the meal intake percentage area. R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for R14 included but not limited to anxiety disorder, hypokalemia, spinal stenosis, lymphedema, and atrial fibrillation. R14's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment protocol) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 03/06/24 coded R14 with a BIMS of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. On 3/19/24 at approximately 12:15 p.m. an observation was made of the lunch meal for the residents on the 300 and 400 units in the dining area. R14's tray was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-29 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to employ sufficient kitchen/dietary staff to ensure palatable food and timely meals. The findings include: On 11/27/23 at 3:00 p.m., accompanied by the kitchen manager (other staff #5), the kitchen and food storage areas were inspected. Foods were observed stored in the refrigerator without proper sealing and date labeling, expired food items stored/available for use, staff members and vendors in the kitchen without hair restraints, improper sanitizer concentration in the 3-compartment sink, dirty stove area, and the dishwasher running with low wash temperature. On 11/27/23 at 4:15 p.m., the resident council president (Resident #1) was interviewed about food/meals in the facility. The council president stated that residents had expressed concerns in the past about sloppy meals and unorganized meal service. The council president stated there had been reports of cold food, but she thought the food presentation was better now. Questioned further, the council president…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide daily meals at regular times and according to posted schedules. The findings include: On 11/27/23 at 4:15 p.m., the resident council president (Resident #1) was interviewed about issues with meal delivery times. Resident #1 stated that the meal service had been unorganized in the past, with meals served late. Resident #1 stated late meal service had been discussed in the resident council meetings and been communicated to the administration. On 11/27/23 at 4:45 p.m., the licensed practical nurse (LPN #1) working on the 300-unit was interviewed about mealtimes. LPN #1 stated they had experienced inconsistent meal service for months. LPN #1 stated that one day breakfast was served at 7:45 a.m. and the next day it was served at 9:30 a.m. LPN #1 stated approximately two weeks ago staff served dinner trays on her unit at 6:45 p.m., which was near shift change time. LPN #1 stated that residents had complained to her about not knowing when meals would be served and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-29 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure accurate meal tickets for eleven of fourteen residents in the survey sample. The findings include: Meal tickets sampled on the 300-unit did not accurately list the food items served. On 11/27/23 starting at 6:10 p.m., a meal observation was conducted on the 300-unit. With residents' permission, meal tickets located on the assigned trays were compared to the meal/food items served. Meal tickets for Residents #1, #4, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13 and #14 did not accurately reflect the food items served. Residents #1, #4, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #12 were served rotisserie chicken, okra/tomatoes, macaroni and cheese, and a dinner roll. Residents #11, #13 and #14 were served the alternate meal of pork roast, buttered noodles, broccoli, and a dinner roll. The meal tickets for these residents did not reflect the food items served with exception of the okra/tomato dish and roll. The meal tickets for the sampled residents inaccurately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide appetizing food with palatable temperatures on one of three units (300-unit). The findings include: On 11/27/23 at 4:15 p.m., the resident council president (Resident #1) was interviewed about food/meals in the facility. The council president stated that residents had expressed concerns in the past about sloppy meals and unorganized meal service. When questioned further, the council president stated there had been reports of cold food, but that she thought the food presentation was better now. The council president stated that she had witnessed a spaghetti meal served with pasta water on the plate making the food soggy. On 11/27/23 at 4:55 p.m., the certified nurses' aide (CNA #1) working on the 300-unit was interviewed about resident food. CNA #1 stated that she had seen oatmeal served in the past several months that was hard. CNA #1 stated milk had to be added to the oatmeal for the resident to get it out of the bowl. CNA #1 stated that the oatmeal had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in a sanitary manner from the main kitchen. The findings include: On 11/27/23 at 3:00 p.m., accompanied by the kitchen manager (other staff #5), the food storage and main kitchen were inspected. Stored in the walk-in refrigerator was an unsealed box of raw bacon. The bacon was exposed to air and had no label indicating the use-by date or date opened. There was a box containing approximately thirty-five 1-ounce packets of sour cream with each having an expiration date of 10/8/23. There were two quarts of unopened Half & Half with a use-by date of 11/20/23. There was an opened carton of liquid egg product with no date opened. A 48-ounce block of cream cheese was stored in plastic wrap with no date opened or use-by date. A one-pound block of margarine was unsealed without any date labeling. The kitchen manager stated at the time of this observation that she had been at the facility for about two weeks and some of the items in question were here before I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain essential kitchen equipment in good working order. The findings include: The sanitizer pump for the 3-compartment sink was not functional. A knob for the front eye was missing/broken on the main kitchen stove. On 11/27/23 at 3:15 p.m., the 3-compartment sink was inspected. When asked to check the sanitizer concentration, the kitchen manager (other staff #5) stated the sanitizer pump was not working for the sanitizer section of the sink. The kitchen manager stated that she thought the unit was waiting for a new battery. On 11/27/23 at 3:45 p.m., the kitchen stove was inspected. The knob to the front eye of the stove was missing. The kitchen manager stated that it was broken and in her office. The kitchen manager stated that the knob had been broken for at least a week. These findings were reviewed with the administrator and director of nursing, during a meeting on 11/28/23 at 4:40 p.m.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to include the medical record as part of a monthly medication regimen review for four of twenty-two residents in the survey sample (Residents #7, #13, #64 and #75). The findings include: Medication regimen reviews for Residents #7, #13, #64 and #75 in December 2022 did not include review of the residents' medical records. 1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, insomnia, hemiplegia, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and osteoporosis. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #7 with moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident #7's clinical record documented a medication regimen review by the consultant pharmacist dated 12/25/22. The consultation report documented the clinical record was not included as part of the review. Documented in the comment section of this report was, In lieu of the resident record,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to prepare food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen. The Findings Include: The kitchen staff were thawing 5 bags of chicken pieces using improper technique. On 1/31/23 at 11:15 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen, 5 bags containing approximately 20 pieces of chicken per bag was submerged in water without water running over the chicken. At this time, the dietary manager (other staff, OS #2), who also observed the chicken in the sink, was interviewed. OS #2 verbalized that the sink had gotten clogged up so the water was cut off. OS #2 was asked how is the chicken supposed to be thawed. OS #2 verbalized that chicken and frozen meat can be thawed in submerged water with water running over the meat. On 1/31/23 at 11:40 AM, the kitchen was again observed and the chicken had been removed from the sink. On 1/31/23 at 2:00 PM, the director of nursing (DON) was made aware of the above findings and agreed that water should being continuously running over frozen meat. On 2/1/23 at 9:10 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed for one of 22 residents in the survey sample (Resident # 10) to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set. Resident #10 was inaccurately identified on a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) as not receiving hospice services. The findings were: Resident # 10 was admitted with diagnoses that included chronic systolic and diastolic heart failure, anemia, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease, renal insufficiency, neurogenic bladder, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, thyroid disorder, arthritis, osteoporosis, anxiety disorder, and respiratory failure. According to the most recent MDS, a Significant Change with an Assessment Reference Date of 1/15/2023, Resident #10 was assessed under Section C (Cognitive Patterns) as moderately cognitively impaired for daily decision making, with a Summary Score of 10 out of 15. Under Section O (Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs), the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-02 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for immediate care upon admission for one of 22 residents, Resident # 293. Findings were: Resident #292 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses including but not limited to Osteomyelitis, urinary tract infection, Alzheimer disease, diabetes mellitus, and congestive heart failure. Due to her recent admission, no MDS (minimum data set) information was available. Review of Resident #292's clinical record on 02/01/2023, at approximately 10:00 a.m, included orders for the treatment and care of a PICC line, administration of IV antibiotics, ileosotomy care, and treatment to a sacral pressure ulcer. No interventions for these areas was observed on the baseline care plan. The MDS nurse, LPN (licensed practical nurse) #5 was interviewed on 02/01/2023 at approximately 2:00 p.m. regarding baseline care plans. LPN #5 stated, The admission nurse does the baseline care plan on paper .we use that for 14 days, while comprehensive is completed. She was asked if the above…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure drugs and biological's were labeled appropriately on one of two nursing units medication room. Findings include: The facility failed to appropriately label a multi-dose vial of Tuberculin on the East unit. On 2/01/23 9:39 AM the East unit medication storage refrigerator was observed with license practical nurse (LPN #3). The refrigerator had one multi-dose vial of tuberculin medication in it's original box. The vial of Tuberculin had been opened and accessed with approximately 1 to 2 doses of the medication remaining in the vial. Neither the vial of Tuberculin or the original box had an open date, indicating when the medication had been opened/accessed. LPN #3 said, The vial of Tuberculin should have an open date on it and should be discarded after 28 days of being opened .since there is no open date it would be discarded. A policy titled, Administering Medications documented, When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container. On 2/1/23 at 4:15 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-02 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a therapeutic diet for one of twenty-two residents in the survey sample (Resident #193). The findings include: Resident #193 was not provided dysphagia mechanical soft food items as ordered by the physician. Resident #193 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included respiratory failure with hypoxia, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and arthritis. The admission assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #193 as cognitively intact. On 1/31/23 at 11:46 a.m., Resident #193 was interviewed about the quality of care in the facility. Regarding food/meals, Resident #193 stated the she was supposed to get a modified diet, but she was receiving regular textured food items. Resident #193 stated that she experienced esophageal burning due to GERD and the softer textured food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed for one of 22 residents in the survey sample (Resident # 38) to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record. The reason for a room change was not included in Resident # 38's clinical record. The findings were: Resident # 38 was admitted with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, hypertension, Non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, psychotic disorder, rheumatoid arthritis, polyneuropathy, immunodeficiency, altered mental status, and osteoporosis. According to the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), a Quarterly review with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/14/2022, Resident #38 was assessed under Section C (Cognitive Patterns) as being moderately cognitively impaired in daily decision making, with a Summary Score of 12 out of 15. Review of the Progress Notes in Resident # 38's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the following entry: 1/23/2023 - 10:49 a.m. - Nursing Progress Note - Resident agreeable to room change to 413A. Courtesy call to son as well. There was no explanation in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene during a medication pass on one of two units (East). The findings include: During a medication pass on the East unit, a nurse failed to perform hand hygiene after gloves changes and between contact with residents' personal items. A medication pass observation was conducted on 2/1/23 at 8:07 a.m. with licensed practical nurse (LPN) #3. Without performing hand hygiene, LPN #3 put on gloves and prepared medicines for the first resident in the medication pass observation (Resident #47). LPN #3 touched Resident #47's cup of water and then discarded the empty medicine cup after the resident was administered the oral medicines. LPN #3 then removed/discarded the gloves and without hand hygiene, put on a clean pair of gloves. LPN #3 then filled the roommate's cup of water, touching the cup, top, and straw. LPN #3 removed/discarded the gloves after handling the resident's cup and then left the resident's room. Without performing hand hygiene, LPN #3 put on clean gloves and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to accurately complete an MDS assessment for one of 21residents, Resident #83. Resident #83's discharge status was incorrectly coded as acute hospitalization. Findings were: Resident #83 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including: Type II diabetes mellitus, fibromyalgia, hypertension and mild depressive disorder. The initial MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 03/04/2021, coded Resident #83 as cognitively intact with a summary score of 14. Resident #83 closed record was identified as hospital discharge. Review of the progress note section revealed notes dated 03/08/2021 which documented: 3/8/2021 13:07 [1:37 p.m.] Social Services Progress Note: (Resident name) left against medical advice (AMA) today. Social services spoke with (resident name) and her son regarding her wanting to leave and explained what AMA meant. It was explained that home health and equipment could not be ordered and follow up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of care for one of 21 residents in the survey sample. Resident #33 was administered the medication alendronate (Fosamax) without following manufacturer recommendations to maximize effectiveness and prevent side effects such as esophagus injury. The findings include: Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, gastroenteritis, colitis, hypertension, vitamin D deficiency, major depressive disorder, osteoporosis, anemia and bipolar disorder. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #33 with moderately impaired cognitive skills. Resident #33's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 2/10/21 for alendronate sodium (Fosamax) 35 milligrams (mg) to be given by mouth every Wednesday for treatment of osteoporosis. The resident's medication administration record (MAR) scheduled the alendronate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide nail care for one of 21 residents in the survey sample. Resident #33 was observed with long, thick, distorted toenails described by the resident as causing discomfort. The findings include: Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, gastroenteritis, colitis, hypertension, vitamin D deficiency, major depressive disorder, osteoporosis, anemia and bipolar disorder. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #33 with moderately impaired cognitive skills and as requiring the extensive assistance of one person for personal hygiene. On 4/13/21 at 11:19 a.m., Resident #33 was observed in bed. The resident was sitting on top of the bed covers with her bare feet/lower legs visible. The toenails on both feet were long, thick and distorted. The great toes nails extended beyond the end of the toe and curved outward. The first toenails on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility failed to accurately complete an admission and weekly skin assessment for one of 21 Residents, Resident #242. The findings include: Resident #242 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #242 included: Schizoaffective disorder, adjustment disorder, chronic pain, and pressure ulcer. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a 5 day assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/7/21. Resident #242 was assessed with a cognitive score of 2 indicating severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #242's medical record included an admission Data Collection assessment dated [DATE]. This assessment documented Resident #242 was newly admitted with a stage 2 pressure ulcer to the sacrum and an unstageable pressure ulcer to the right heel. The baseline care plan for skin integrity was completed upon admission and dated 4/1/21. The goal for skin integrity was to Prevent any skin breakdown or injury.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medication pass observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. There were five observed medication errors out of 35 opportunities resulting in 14.2% error rate. The findings include: 1. On 4/14/21 at 7:45 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN #5) was observed administering medications to Resident #33. LPN #5 prepared and administered the following medications to Resident #33: folic acid 2 milligrams (mg), vitamin D 50 micrograms (mcg), loperamide 4 mg, mesalamine 1.2 grams (2 tablets), fiber capsule 625 mg and fiber powder (Metamucil) 10 cc (cubic centimeters) mixed in a cup of water. Cholestyramine powder was not included in the administered medications. Resident #33's clinical record documented a physician's order dated 2/10/21 for cholestyramine powder 4 grams/dose with instructions to give 1 packet by mouth twice per day for the treatment of Crohn's disease. Resident #33's clinical record did not include a physician's order for the fiber powder (Metamucil). On 4/14/21 at 9:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure expired medications were not readily available for distribution on one of 3 units, the 400 unit. The findings include: On 04/14/2021 at 8:35 a.m., medication storage observations were conducted on the 400 unit with licensed practical nurse (LPN #4). Observed on the 400 - [NAME] A medication cart was the following opened bottle of medication: [NAME] Natural K, Vitamin K 100 mcg (micrograms), with an open date of 7/2/19 and expiration date of 2-21 (February 2021). On 04/14/2021 at 8:45 a.m., LPN #4 was interviewed regarding expired medication. LPN #4 stated, Normally the third shift nurse and/or the unit manager checks the carts for expired medication. However, all of the nurses are responsible for checking for expired medications. A review of the facility's policy titled 5.3 Storage and Expiration of Medications, Biologicals, Syringes, and Needles, Revision Date 10/31/16 documented the following: 4. Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow infection control protocols for hand hygiene on one of three nursing units. A nurse on East wing failed to don gloves and perform hand hygiene between residents when obtaining fingerstick blood samples for glucometer testing. The findings include: On 4/13/21 at 11:30 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN) #6 was observed checking Resident #11's blood sugar using a glucometer. LPN #6, with a glove only on her right hand, used a lancet to stick one of Resident #11's fingertips and applied the blood sample onto a testing strip. After completing the fingerstick and obtaining a blood sugar reading, LPN #6 removed the glove on her right hand and exited the room. Without performing hand hygiene, LPN #6 went to the medication cart located near the nursing desk and recorded the blood sugar reading. LPN #6 then proceeded to Resident #66 with the glucometer. On 4/13/21 at 11:32 a.m., LPN #6 used a lancet to stick Resident #66's fingertip. LPN #6, with a glove only on her right hand, obtained a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-06-24 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on survey findings and staff interviews, the facility administrator failed to ensure that resources regarding the use of side rails were used effectively and efficiently to maintain the highest practicable well-being of each resident. Information regarding the 2017 regulatory requirements for side rails was available to the facility administrator but not implemented. Findings were: An onsite survey was conducted from 06/18/2019 through 06/24/2019. During the survey deficient practice was identified in the area of quality of care at F700. The scope and severity was cited at a level IV, pattern. The facility failed to provide alternative measures to residents in lieu of side rails, failed to assess residents for the risk of entrapment prior to the implementation of side rails, failed to obtain informed consents prior to the use of side rails, and failed to provide ongoing assessment and monitoring of side rails in use. Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard quality of care were identified on 06/20/2019. While discussing and reviewing the facility's plan of removal, an assessment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-06-24 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on an overview of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, staff interview, and the identification of Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care in the area of Quality of Care, specifically Federal Tag F-700 (Bedrails), the facility's QAPI Program failed to identify a systemic problem with the use of bedrails, and failed to develop a mitigation program to address the problem. The findings were: During the survey process, the survey team identified a systemic problem with the facility's use of 1/4 bedrails that resulted in the identification of Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care. The facility was using 1/4 bedrails for residents who were not individually assessed for the need of bedrails, who were not offered alternative measures before the use of bedrails, who did not have an order for bedrails, who did not have a care plan for bedrails, and for whom no consent had been obtained from the resident or the resident's Responsible Party for the use of bedrails. At approximately 3:30 p.m. on 6/24/19, the Administrator was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to perform a pressure ulcer dressing change per physician's order for one of 24 residents, Resident #67. LPN (licensed practical nurse) #2 was observed providing incorrect treatments to two pressure ulcer sites on Resident #67's hips. Findings were: Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included but were not limited to: Osteoporosis, history of breast cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, atrial fibrillation, and diabetes mellitus. A quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 05/15/2019, assessed Resident #67 as moderately impaired in her cognitive status, with a summary score of 10. The clinical record was reviewed on 06/18/2019. Per the clinical record, Resident #67 had two unavoidable pressure ulcers. One was located on the right hip and was classified as a Stage II, the other was on the left hip and classified as a Stage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide supervision for one of 24 residents in the survey sample, Resident #89. Resident #89 was observed seated in a wheelchair with her toes pointing downward and her feet not flat on the floor. Resident #89 was attempting to self propel in her wheelchair but was unable to do so using only her toes. Resident #89 was then pulling at the door of another resident's room and in the living room of the unit, leaning forward and getting cups out of the trash cans; she was observed putting the cups to her lips and spitting into them. The findings include: Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, but not limited to: Alzheimer's Disease, weight loss, Chronic diastolic heart failure, anxiety, history of TIA (transient ischemic attacks), history of falls, and abnormal posture. A quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 05/29/2019, assessed Resident #89…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-06-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure two of 24 residents in the survey sample (Residents # 48 and 97) were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications. Residents # 48 and 97 both had an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication ordered for more than 14 days without a stop date. The findings include: 1. Resident # 97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, generalized muscle weakness, history of falling, dysphagia, dyspnea, non-rheumatic mitral valve insufficiency, and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressive mood. According to a Medicare 14-Day Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 6/10/19, the resident was assessed under Section C (Cognitive Patterns) as being moderately cognitively impaired, with a Summary Score of 11 out of 15. Resident # 97 had the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure expired medications were not available for administration in two of two medication rooms, and also failed to ensure insulin was properly labeled on one of 6 medication carts. 1. The medication room refrigerators on the East hall and [NAME] hall contained three bottles each of Lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) which were expired and available for administration. 2. The medication cart on the 400 unit contained two vials of improperly labeled insulin. Findings include: 1. On 6/18/19 the medication room on the East hall was inspected with RN (registered nurse) # 1. The refrigerator contained three opened bottles of Lorazepam. The bottles were not dated. RN # 1 was asked about the medications, and if an opened date was needed on each one. RN # 1 stated Those aren't mine; we store the other residents on the other hall in this refrigerator as well. I do not have any residents on that medication right now; those must belong to the other nurse. If they were mine, they would have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for one of 24 residents in the survey sample: Resident # 84. Findings include: Resident # 84 was admitted to the facility 9/1/18 with a readmission date of 3/12/19. Diagnoses for Resident # 84 included, but was not limited to: unspecified abdominal pain, Parkinson's disease, gout, high blood pressure, and dementia. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) was a significant change in status assessment dated [DATE]. Resident # 84 was coded with severe cognitive impairment with a total summary score of 00 out of 15. During review of Resident # 84's electric medical record (EMR) on 6/19/19 at 3:30 p.m. it was noted a hospital discharge summary for another resident was scanned into Resident # 84's record. The documentation was dated 5/15/19. On 6/20/19 at 8:30 a.m. the medical record staff, OS (other staff) # 1 was asked about the scanned documentation. OS # 1 stated This scanning into a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$94,940 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $94,940 — penalty dated 2026-05-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVARDIS HEALTH — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Ashland Nursing And RehabilitationAshland, VA 1 of 5Augusta Nursing and RehabilitationFishersville, VA 1 of 5Biltmore Haven Nursing and RehabilitationArden, NC 1 of 5Courtyard Health And RehabilitationMcComb, MS 1 of 5Emerald Ridge Health and RehabilitationAsheville, NC 1 of 5Ghent Health and RehabilitationNorfolk, VA 1 of 5Grand Trace Health And RehabilitationNatchez, MS 1 of 5Hibriten Mountain Nursing and RehabilitationLenoir, NC 1 of 5Highfield Nursing and RehabilitationCary, NC 1 of 5Middleton Oaks Health And RehabilitationWinona, MS 1 of 5Newport News Nursing & RehabNewport News, VA 1 of 5Pennknoll VillageEverett, PA 1 of 5The Oaks Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMeridian, MS 1 of 5Wellington Rehabilitation and HealthcareKnightdale, NC 1 of 5Westwood Health and RehabilitationArchdale, NC 1 of 5Woodstock Valley Health and RehabilitationWoodstock, VA 2 of 5Clay County Health and RehabilitationHayesville, NC 2 of 5Crown Haven Health and RehabilitationCharlotte, NC 2 of 5Kannapolis Health and RehabilitationKannapolis, NC 2 of 5Manor At Penn Village, TheSelinsgrove, PA 2 of 5Manor At St Luke Village,theHazleton, PA 2 of 5Pavilion At St Luke Village, TheHazleton, PA 2 of 5Pheasant Ridge Nursing and RehabilitationRoanoke, VA 2 of 5Valley View Care and RehabilitationAndrews, NC 2 of 5Walnut Cove Health and RehabilitationWalnut Cove, NC 2 of 5Wilora Lake HealthcareCharlotte, NC 2 of 5Windsor Grove Health and RehabilitationWindsor, VA 3 of 5Forrest Oakes HealthcareAlbemarle, NC 3 of 5Hilltop Manor Health And Rehabilitation CenterUnion, MS 3 of 5Locust Grove Retirement VillageMifflin, PA 3 of 5Skyline Nursing & RehabilitationFloyd, VA 4 of 5Jamestown Health and RehabilitationWilliamsburg, VA 4 of 5Oak Grove HealthcareRutherfordton, NC 4 of 5Willowbrook Rehabilitation and CareYadkinville, NC 5 of 5Cardinal Healthcare and RehabilitationLincolnton, NC 5 of 5Grayson Health and RehabilitationIndependence, VANot rated (Special Focus)Starkville Manor Health Care And Rehabilitation CeStarkville, MS

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
STAUNTON PARENTCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2025
NAS HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2025
VAOP HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2025
CLARK, ALYSSAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
HOBACK, TIFFANYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
BAROCO, PATRICKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
BREACH, CHADIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
CHAPUT, TANAYAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
JONES, TEQUILLAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
SNF MGR LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$673K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 13%Other / private 18%

This home reported $673K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$299per resident / day
operating cost
$9,088per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$330per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495344. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-02-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next