Altercare Of Alliance Ctr For Rehab & Nc INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 67.8 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were disbursed to the resident's estate within 30 days as required. This affected one (Resident #79) of six residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of Resident #79's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] and diagnoses including dysphagia, weakness, cerebral infarction, dementia without behavioral disturbance and anemia. Resident #79's son was listed as his emergency contact. Resident #79 expired in the facility on [DATE]. Review of the facility resident funds report dated [DATE] revealed Resident #79 had a balance of $92.51. There was a notation that Resident #79 had expired on [DATE] on the report. Review of Resident #79's resident fund statement for [DATE] through [DATE] revealed Resident #79 had an ending balance of $92.51 as of [DATE]. Interview on [DATE] at 4:19 P.M. with Lead Receptionist (LR) #875 revealed the facility's corporate office was responsible for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the physician and/or nurse practitioner and family of Resident #78 were notified of a change in condition. This affected one resident (#78) out of 20 residents reviewed for notification of change in condition. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of closed medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 02/07/25 and an expiration date of 02/17/25. Diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), complete traumatic amputation of one right lesser toe, essential hypertension (high blood pressure), and dementia. Review of the baseline care plan located in the facility document Clinical admission Documentation 0419-U, dated 02/07/25, revealed Resident #78 had respiratory issues due to history of smoking, pulmonary effusion (collection of fluid around the lungs), and need for oxygen. Approaches included keep head of bed up as tolerated, check pulse oxygen level per order, provide oxygen therapy per order, routine monitoring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, facility policy review, and review of the National Institute of Health guidance, the facility failed to ensure reusable resident nebulizer masks were bagged to prevent the potential for cross contamination of the nebulizer mask. This affected two (Residents #3 and #46) of three residents (Residents #3, #17 and #46) reviewed for respiratory therapy. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed the resident was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute on chronic diastolic congestive heart failure (CHF) and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (insufficient oxygen supply at the tissue level). Review of Resident #3's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition and had no rejection of care. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 08/25/24 for albuterol sulfate solution (bronchodilator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate accounting and administration of opioid medications. This affected two (Residents #25 and #58) of two residents identified during review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI) investigation. Findings include: Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including bilateral primary osteoarthritis of the knee, other chronic pain and depression. Review of Resident #25's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. Review of Resident #25's physician orders revealed an order dated 02/10/25 for oxycodone 10 mg (milligrams) three times a day to be administered at 9:00 A.M., 1:00 P.M. and 6:30 P.M. Review of SRI Tracking Number #258409 dated 03/19/25 revealed there was a medication discrepancy. On 03/19/25 during a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, facility self reported incident review, interview and policy review the facility failed to report an allegation of medication misappropriation to the Administrator and state survey agency. This affected one (Resident #18) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/29/24 with admission diagnoses that included cervical radiculopathy, spinal stenosis and chronic pain. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment with a reference date of 06/05/24 indicated Resident #18 had an intact and independent cognition level. Review of the physician orders revealed the use of tramadol 50 mg every eight hours as needed for pain control. There was no evidence of a physician order for the use of cetirizine noted. Interview with Resident #18 on 07/22/24 at 10:01 A.M. revealed approximately one month ago a nurse provided him a different pill than his prescribed narcotic analgesic medication. Resident #18 further added that he kept the pill…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, facility self reported incident review, interview and policy review the facility failed to investigate an allegation of medication misappropriation. This affected one (Resident #18) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/29/24 with admission diagnoses that included cervical radiculopathy, spinal stenosis and chronic pain. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment with a reference date of 06/05/24 indicated Resident #18 had an intact and independent cognition level. Review of the physician orders revealed the use of tramadol 50 mg every eight hours as needed for pain control. There was no evidence of a physician order for the use of cetirizine noted. Interview with Resident #18 on 07/22/24 at 10:01 A.M. revealed approximately one month ago a nurse provided him a different pill than his prescribed narcotic analgesic medication. Resident #18 further added that he kept the pill and advised the Assistant Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-03-14 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on review of the facility Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) submission data and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure submission of the Payroll Based Journal data as required. This had the potential to affect all 85 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) submission data report revealed no evidence of data submitted by the facility for fiscal year 2023 for the third quarter (April 1 to June 30). Interview with the facility Administrator on 03/14/24 at 10:40 A.M. revealed the facility corporate office submits the PBJ data. The Administrator verified the lack of PBJ submission and this had been identified by the facility. The facility implemented the following corrective actions: As a result of the incident, the facility took the following actions to correct the deficient practice on 10/31/23: - Corporate Human Resources staff were educated on PBJ submission by the corporation president on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to store medications properly for Residents #5, #20, #22, and #55 in the medication cart on the South and Speret units. This affected four residents (#5, #20, #22, and #55) of 12 residents (#4, #5, #8, #20, #22, #23, #24, #26, #32, #55, #64, and #69) the South and Speret units who receive narcotic medications. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 03/16/20. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, antisocial behavior, and major depressive disorder. Review of care plan for Resident #5 dated 06/14/22 revealed he had aggressive behaviors. Interventions included administering medications as ordered and redirecting Resident #5 from unsafe situations. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had severe cognitive impairment with a memory problem. Resident #5 required extensive one-person…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of temperature logs, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were stored wth proper temperature controls. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings included: 1. Observation on 10/24/22 at 10:02 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #197 revealed the medication refrigerator was 26 degrees Fahrenheit. There were insulins (Levemir (1), Trulicity (3), Lantus (18), Humalog (2), acetaminophen suppository (22), Latanoprost eye drops (1), and one vial of tuberculosis that was stored in the refrigerator door. Observation on 10/25/22 at 7:16 A.M., of the North and Novartis medication refrigerators with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the North refrigerator was 32 degrees Fahrenheit and the Novartis was 28-degree Fahrenheit. The DON reported the refrigerated temperatures should be 35 to 41 degrees Fahrenheit according to the refrigerator temperature logs. The Novartis refrigerator contained acetaminophen and bisacodyl suppository, Latanoprost eye drops, insulins (Humalog, Lantus,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-10-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of menus, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate amount of food was served in accordance with menus. This had the potential to affect 72 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, #73, #127, #277, #329, #330, #331) of 79 residents who had orders for regular or mechanical soft texture. The census was 79. Findings include: Review of the menu and spreadsheet for lunch on 10/26/22 revealed items to be served included eight ounces of broccoli chicken [NAME] for all diets except small portion orders (four ounces) and puree (2/3 cup). On 10/26/22 observation of tray line between 12:05 P.M. and 12:11 P.M. revealed staff had four ounce scoops in the broccoli chicken [NAME] (both regular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALTERCARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $829K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH