No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Altercare Of Navarre Ctr For Rehab & Nrsg Care

517 Park Street NW, Navarre, OH 44662 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (330) 879-2765 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (330) 879-2765 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited May 20242 actual-harm citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited May 2024
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2935 Lincoln Way W · (330) 236-2300 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4254 Erie Ave SW · (330) 879-5626 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4676 Erie Ave SW · (330) 879-5393 · Call to confirm hours
Park
8042-8062 Hudson Dr SW · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.9%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.4%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms43.0%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.8%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication34.3%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.9%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%3.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.4%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine45.7%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.8%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.3%12.9%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
39.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 39.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.4%CMS range 44.2–66.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 7.0–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge39.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge27.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge30.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.6–11.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.75
RN hours/ resident / day
0.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.29
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.68
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
54.7%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 83.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-21)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital documentation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure ongoing assessments and monitoring were completed for Resident #10's right ring finger skin impairment. This finding affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for skin impairments.Actual harm occurred on 07/02/25 when Resident #10, who was assessed upon admission with a right ring finger bruise and/or scab, was admitted to the hospital with the diagnosis of a necrotic finger resulting in the partial amputation of his right ring finger.Findings Include:Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses including necrotizing fasciitis, cutaneous abscess of the groin and end stage renal disease.Review of Resident #10's progress note dated 06/12/25 at 6:50 P.M. (recorded as a late entry on 06/13/25 at 01:19 A.M.) authored by Registered Nurse (RN) #812 revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review and staff interview the facility failed to implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program for Resident #95 to prevent the development and worsening of pressure ulcers. Actual harm occurred on [DATE] when Resident #95 was admitted to the facility, at risk for pressure ulcer development and with evidence of pressure ulcers present and was not provided adequate assessment/monitoring of skin, wound care or effective and individualized pressure ulcer preventative measures. On [DATE] the resident was assessed by the wound nurse practitioner to have developed new and worsening pressure ulcers including an unstageable pressure ulcer to the coccyx, a deep tissue injury (DTI) to the left heel, DTI ulcers to the left metatarsals and lateral malleolus, a DTI to the right heel and a DTI to the right lateral calf. This affected one resident (Resident #95) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 94.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests for urine culture and sensitivity were obtained timely and as ordered for Resident #90. This effected one resident (#90) of three reviewed for bowel and bladder. The facility census was 91.Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included quadriplegia, extended spectrum beta lactamase, neurogenic bowel, chronic respiratory failure, urinary tract infection, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, chronic pain syndrome, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, hypotension, cachexia, chronic idiopathic constipation, polyneuropathy, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, hyperlipidemia, generalized anxiety disorder, diabetes, major depressive disorder, personal history of urinary (tract) infections, generalized hyperhidrosis, localized edema, insomnia, hypertension, seizures, and hydronephrosis with ureteral stricture.Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet resident needs including answering call lights in a timely manner and operating mechanical lift devices in a safe manner. This affected three residents (#17, #40, and #61) and had the potential to affect all 89 residents in the facility. Findings include:On 04/13/26 at 10:44 A.M., an interview with Resident #39 stated there was not enough staff on first and second shifts, and call lights took a while to answer. On 04/13/26 from 11:06 A.M. through 11:32 A.M., observation and interview revealed Resident #40 was on airborne precautions for Covid with personal protective equipment (PPE) located outside the resident's closed door. At 11:06 A.M. Resident #40 activated her call light. The call light remained on at 11:11 A.M. Facility staff were observed going up and down hall past the resident's room while the light was on including Regional Registered Nurses (RRN) #648 and #649. The Assistant Director of Nursing also went up and down the hall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician or nurse practitioner (NP) was notified promptly of Resident #104's change in condition, failed to ensure Residents #7 and #52's wound care were completed as ordered and Resident #98's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) was removed timely as ordered. This finding affected one (Resident #104) of three residents reviewed for a change in condition, two (Residents #7 and #52) of three residents reviewed for general skin conditions, and one (Resident #98) of one resident reviewed for PICC lines. The facility census was 89.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #104's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere and need for assistance with personal care.Review of Resident #104's hospital discharge documentation dated 08/12/24 revealed the resident's code status was Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Do Not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain Residents #3, #84, #101 and #104's weights as ordered to ensure proper nutrition status. This finding affected four residents (Residents #3, #84, #101 and #104) of six residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 89.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic cholecystitis, cystostomy status, and chronic diastolic heart failure. Review of orders revealed no order listed for weights. Review of the care plan dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was at risk for altered nutrition related to impaired skin integrity and medical diagnoses. Interventions included provide supplements as ordered and diet as ordered. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #3 required extensive assistance for all activities of daily living. Review of the weights for Resident #3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate documentation in the medical record for all residents. This affected five residents (#2, #8, #26, #57, and #86) and had the potential to affect all 89 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 03/29/25 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and end stage renal disease. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #26 revealed there were no active dietary orders in place. The previous dietary order for a renal diet gluten free was discontinued on 04/01/26. Review of the nutritional assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 needed a diet order added to the electronic medical record. Review of the dietary progress note dated 04/11/26 at 11:13 A.M. revealed Resident #26 did not have a diet order in the electronic medical record and the previous diet was renal diet gluten free with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #54's dignity was maintained at all times. This affected one resident (Resident #54) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 86.Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 07/03/25 with diagnoses included hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and legal blindness. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 had intact cognition. Resident #54 required extensive assistance for all activities of daily living. Review of the physician's order dated 07/17/25 revealed Resident #54 was dependent for shaving and required shaving weekly. Review of the care plan dated 01/19/26 revealed Resident #54 was unable to perform activities of daily living. Interventions included to perform nail and hair care weekly with showers and to assist with and or shave facial hairs. Review of the facility shower schedule revealed Resident #54 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify Resident #98's representative of a change in condition. This affected one (Resident #98) of three residents reviewed for notification of change in condition. The facility census was 86.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #98 revealed an admission date of 01/19/26 and a discharge date of 02/10/26 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, osteoporosis, and end stage renal disease.Review of the face sheet for Resident #98 revealed she was listed as the primary contact and her mother was also listed as a primary contact.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #98 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #98 required extensive assistance for all activities of daily living.Review of the care plan dated 01/31/26 revealed Resident #98 had a risk for pathological injuries/falls and pain related to osteoporosis.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to care plan a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line for Resident #98. This affected one resident (Resident #98) of six residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 86. Review of the medical record for Resident #98 revealed an admission date of 01/19/26 and discharge date of 02/10/26 with diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, chronic diastolic heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and end stage renal disease. Review of the orders for Resident #98 revealed an order dated 01/27/26 revealed an order to schedule an appointment for PICC line removal. No other PICC line orders were observed. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #98 had mild cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance for all activities of daily living. Review of the comprehensive care plan dated 01/23/26 revealed no documentation related to the PICC line. Interview on 04/20/26 at 10:22 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised for weight loss. This affected two residents (Residents #84 and #101) of six residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 89. Findings Include:1. Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anoxic brain damage, traumatic brain injury, legal blindness, overactive bladder, psychosis, visual hallucinations, delusional disorder, anxiety disorder, epilepsy, chronic pain, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #84's nursing progress notes revealed on 04/04/26 at 2:17 P.M. Registered Dietician (RD) #650 documented the resident had a significant weight loss at the 180 day marker with March weights. Weight loss was appropriate due to her Body Mass Index (BMI) of 25.3 being overweight for her height. RD #650 noted the resident's meal intakes were varied and the resident's oral intake would be monitored and if there was a need for nutritional supplements if weight loss…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed timely assist Resident #17 with activities of daily living (ADLs). This affected one resident (Resident #17) out of 13 reviewed for ADL care. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 11/05/20 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, bipolar disorder, herpes viral infection, and dementia. Review of the care plan dated 11/21/20 revealed Resident #17 had an impaired ability to perform or participate in daily activities of daily living (ADL) care related to diabetes mellitus, neuropathy, weakness, debility, chronic respiratory failure, anemia, morbid obesity, arthritis, back pain, and shortness of breath on exertion and when lying flat. Interventions included provide assistance with all ADL care and mobility as needed and anticipate resident needs as able implemented 11/21/20, and mechanical lift with assistance of two staff for transfers implemented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #3, #66 and #67's pressure ulcer wound care was completed as ordered and per best practice guidelines. This finding affected three (Residents #3, #66 and #67) of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 89.Findings include: 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic cholecystitis, congestive heart failure, high blood pressure, renal insufficiency, diabetes, protein malnutrition, anxiety disorder, depression, atrial fibrillation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. Review of Resident #3's physician's orders revealed on 12/12/25 and order was written for Expedite (a liquid protein supplement) 30 milliliters (ml) twice a day for wounds. An order written on 03/09/26 to clean sacrum with wound cleanser as needed and on a weekly basis. No other wound healing supplements were ordered. Review of the comprehensive quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide safe transfer assistance utilizing a mechanical lift device for Resident #61. This affected one resident (#61) out of seven reviewed for accident hazards. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 10/07/24 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, abnormalities of gait and mobility, reduced mobility, rheumatoid arthritis, acquired absence of left leg below knee, repeated falls, and history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction. Review of the care plan dated 10/08/24 revealed Resident #61 had impaired ability to perform or participate in activities of daily living (ADL) care related to left below knee amputation, diabetes mellitus, tremors, use of assistive devices, dialysis, impaired range of motion of the left lower extremity, and medical co-morbidities. Interventions included provide assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #27's respiratory needs were ordered and the cleaning and storage of oxygen services were in place. This affected two residents (#27 and #89) out of four reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 01/05/26 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, asthma, thrombocytopenia, end stage renal disease, history of pulmonary embolism, and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of the care plan, revised 01/05/26, revealed Resident #27 had the potential for alteration in respiratory function related to congestive heart failure, asthma, shortness of breath while lying flat or during exertion, anxiety, and obesity. Interventions included administer oxygen as ordered implemented 01/05/26. Review of the five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 had no cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents on dialysis received ongoing assessment and monitoring to ensure health status and reduce complication of dialysis care. This finding affected three (Residents #26, #67, and #85) of five residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 89.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 03/29/25 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and end stage renal disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had no cognitive impairment and received dialysis treatments. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #26 identified orders for dialysis every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 5:30 A.M. effective 04/06/26, complete the pre-dialysis observation and vital signs on dialysis days at 4:30 A.M. effective 04/06/26, and completed the post-dialysis observation and vital signs on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #12 was free from significant medication error. This finding affected one (Resident #12) of six residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 89.Findings include: Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care and chronic kidney disease stage 4.Review of Resident #12's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] the resident exhibited intact cognition.Review of Resident #12's physician orders revealed an order dated 04/11/26 for Buspirone 10 milligrams (mg) three times a day (due at 7:00 A.M. to 11:00 A.M., 1:00 P.M. to 2:30 P.M. and 6:30 P.M. to 10:30 P.M.; Ferrous Sulfate 325 mg twice daily with meals (due from 7:00 A.M. to 11:00 A.M. and 6:30 P.M. to 10:30 P.M.; Humalog KwikPen insulin 12 units subcutaneous with breakfast once a day at 7:00 A.M.; Lactulose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured appropriately. This finding affected two of the three medication carts reviewed. The facility census was 89.Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/20/26 at 9:42 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #517 of the 400-hall medication cart revealed one loose white pill lying on the bottom of the second drawer of the medication cart. Interview on 04/20/26 at 9:45 A.M. with LPN #517 confirmed the above findings. 2. Observation on 04/20/26 at 9:55 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #646 of the 300-Long medication cart revealed one loose green pill located on the bottom of the second drawer of the medication administration cart. Interview on 04/20/26 at 10:00 A.M. with RN #646 confirmed the above findings. Review of the Medication Storage in the Facility policy dated 05/2020 revealed medications were stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply was accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain laboratory samples and results as ordered. This affected one resident (#85) out of six reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an admission date of 01/23/26 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, seizures, and history of cerebral infarction. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #85 identified orders for Levetiracetam (Keppra) 500 milligrams (mg) per 5 milliliters (ml) to give 500 mg twice daily effective 01/29/26. Review of the pharmacy recommendation dated 02/03/26 revealed a recommendation was made for a supplemental dose of Levetiracetam after each dialysis session. Nurse Practitioner (NP) #658 reviewed the recommendation on 02/26/26 and ordered to obtain a Levetiracetam level on the next lab day. Review of the laboratory documentation revealed NP #658 ordered for the bloodwork to be drawn on 02/27/26 and the lab did not collect the specimen because Resident #85 was at dialysis, which the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control protocols for residents on contact isolation and droplet isolation. This affected three residents (#12, #17, and #40) out of five reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 89. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 08/23/25 with diagnoses including history of urinary tract infections, type two diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #12 identified orders for contact transmission based precautions effective 04/11/26. Review of the progress note dated 04/11/26 at 3:20 P.M. revealed Resident #12 had returned from the hospital this day and was on contact isolation precautions due to a urinary tract infection with the presence of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL), which are enzymes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #8's responsible party was notified of new orders and changes in Resident #8's condition. This affected one (Resident #8) of three residents reviewed for notifications. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, hyperlipidemia, osteoporosis, hypothyroidism, hypotension, insomnia, adult failure to thrive, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and hypertension. Review of a progress note dated 12/02/24 revealed Resident #8 was in isolation for Covid positive precautions. A progress note dated 12/14/24 revealed Resident #8 was administered an oral antibiotic for a urinary tract infection. Review of the physician orders revealed cephalexin 500 milligrams (mg) twice a day from 12/14/24 through 12/21/24 for a urinary tract infection. Review of physician orders revealed on 01/04/25 Resident #8 had new orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to prevent Resident #8 from receiving the wrong medication. This affected one (Resident #8) of three residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, hyperlipidemia, osteoporosis, hypothyroidism, hypotension, insomnia, adult failure to thrive, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and hypertension. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of physician orders revealed on 01/04/25 Resident #8 had new orders for acetaminophen (for mild pain) 1000 milligrams (mg) every six hours as needed, albuterol sulfate (to prevent and treat difficulty breathing) inhaler two puffs every four hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound care was completed as ordered for Residents #43, #51 and #77 and timely wound assessments were completed for Resident #77. This finding affected three (Residents #43, #51 and #77) of four residents reviewed for wounds. Findings include: 1. Review of #51's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including other acute osteomyelitis of the right ankle and foot, encounter for other orthopedic aftercare and end stage renal disease. Review of Resident #51's hospital report dated 12/09/24 revealed the resident had a right lower extremity non healing wound with osteomyelitis related to advanced peripheral vascular disease and insulin dependent diabetes. Review of Resident #51's care plans revealed an intervention dated 12/10/24 indicated to note amount and characteristics of any wound drainage, and observe effectiveness of ordered treatments. Notify the physician as needed. Review of Resident ##51's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #77's pressure ulcer wound care was completed as ordered. This finding affected one (Resident #77) of four residents reviewed for wound care. Findings include: Review of Resident #77's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including other acute osteomyelitis of the left ankle and foot, diabetes and partial traumatic amputation of the left foot. Review of Resident #77's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed intact cognition. Review of Resident #77's podiatrist note dated 11/12/24 revealed the resident had a stage three pressure ulcer of the left heel. Review of Resident #77's physician orders revealed an order dated 12/02/24 (discontinued 12/23/24) to cleanse the left foot with normal saline, apply Iodoform packing and a dry dressing to the left foot, apply betadine wet to dry to left heel and silver alginate and an abdominal (ABD) dressing to the anterior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of resident diet orders, review of menus/spreadsheets, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper portion sizes of food were served to residents on a carbohydrate controlled (CCHO)/low concentrated sweet (LCS) diet. This affected six (Residents #32, #35, #36, #39, #40, and #43) of 30 residents on the 200 hall who had trays served. Findings include: Review of the menu and spreadsheet for lunch on 08/27/24 revealed the only difference between the regular diets and carbohydrate controlled (low concentrated sweet) diet was the portion size. The regular diet included a #8 scoop (1/2 cup) of au gratin potatoes and four ounces of mixed vegetables. The carbohydrate controlled diet called for a #10 scoop (3/8 cup) of au gratin potatoes and a three ounce serving of mixed vegetables. On 08/27/24 between 11:22 A.M. and 11:40 A.M. observations were made of the tray line. All residents who received au gratin potatoes and mixed vegetables were provided the same amount with the same utensils utilized to measure out the food. On 08/27/24 at 11:35 A.M., Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor a resident's oxygen saturations in accordance with physician orders. This affected one (Resident #44) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The census was 87. Findings include: Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, obstructive sleep apnea, and atherosclerotic heart disease. A physician order dated 05/17/24 revealed Resident #44 had an order for continuous oxygen at two liters per minute via nasal cannula. Instructions revealed to check placement and record oxygen saturation every shift. The only oxygen saturation able to be located between 08/15/24 and 08/26/24 revealed one oxygen saturation level was recorded on 08/23/24 at 4:32 A.M. and recorded as 97%. Observations on 08/28/24 at 2:05 P.M. revealed Resident #44's oxygen saturation level was 98% with oxygen at two liters per minute via nasal cannula. During an interview on 08/27/24 at 2:24 P.M., Registered Nurse (RN) #110 verified she was unable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident medical record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer wounds were accurately staged. This affected two (Residents #47 and #39) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified six residents (Residents #5, #8, #39, #47, #53 and #245) with current pressure ulcer wounds. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/01/23 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease with dementia and anemia. Further review of the medical record including care plan, Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment and pressure ulcer risk assessment identified the resident at high risk for the development of pressure ulcer wounds. MDS 3.0 assessment with a reference date of 07/11/24 indicated Resident #47 had a severely impaired cognition level. A nursing note on 07/01/24 indicated Resident #47 was evaluated by the wound nurse practitioner for a new wound which the wound nurse practitioner indicated was a stage three pressure ulcer wound (full thickness skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #30's expired Lantus long-acting insulin was discarded as appropriate. This finding affected one (Resident #30) of two residents who receive insulin on the 100 A medication cart. Findings include: Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and type two diabetes. Review of Resident #30's physician orders revealed an order dated [DATE] for Lantus insulin 56 units once daily due from 7:00 A.M. to 11:00 A.M. Observation on [DATE] at 7:40 A.M. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #401 of the 100 A medication cart revealed Resident #30's Lantus long-acting insulin Kwikpen was dated [DATE]. Interview on [DATE] at 7:45 A.M. with ADON #401 confirmed Resident #30's Lantus long-acting insulin Kwikpen was expired and should have been discarded. Review of the Highlights of Prescribing Information (for Lantus) revised 06/23 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control procedures were maintained while completing Resident #193's wound care. This finding affected one (Resident #193) of five residents reviewed for pressure wounds. Findings include: Review of Resident #193's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis of the right lower limb and pressure ulcers to the right and left heels. Review of Resident #193's physician orders revealed an order dated 07/15/24 to apply liquid skin prep/barrier film to the affected area, cover with an abdominal wrap and kerlix daily and as needed; and an order dated 07/15/24 to apply liquid skin prep/barrier film to the affected area, cover with an abdominal pad and wrap with kerlix daily and as needed. Review of Resident #193's left heel pressure wound skin grid dated 07/15/24 authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Wound Care Supervisor #375 revealed an unstageable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, interview, investigation review and policy review the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of resident medication. This affected three residents (#10, #11 and #12) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The census was 86. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/30/24 and a discharge date [DATE]. Diagnoses included status post triple aortic repair, peripheral vascular disease, and acute respiratory failure. Review of Resident #10's April 2024 physician orders revealed an order for Oxycodone 5 milligrams (mg) as needed for moderate pain, severe back pain, or breakthrough pain to be given every four hours. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was receiving an opioid. The assessment was not completed due to the residents' short stay in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of receipts, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide an adequate supply of supports for daily living. This affected two residents (#19 and #16) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. This had the potential to affect 37 residents in the facility who are dependent on staff for the provision of incontinence care. Findings included: Observation on 01/26/24 at 1:40 P.M. during a tour of the supply areas in the facility with Maintenance Assistant (MA) #133 revealed the supply closet on the 200 hall did not have any wipes available and the shower room had four boxes of wipes, each box contained 12 packages of 64 wipes. An additional five packages of wipes were also in the shower room. In the 300 hall supply closet there were zero wipes available but eight washcloths were available on a linen cart. On the 100 and 400 halls, there were zero washcloths or wipes available in the supply rooms. In the laundry room, there were 17 washcloths . MA #133 confirmed the findings on 01/26/24 at 1:56 P.M. MA #133 stated the facility tried to do away with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of resident Matrix, policy review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure wound care was provided per orders. This affected one resident (#70) of three reviewed for skin alterations. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of left lower leg with fat layer exposed, non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right foot with fat layer exposed, abrasion, left lower leg, heart failure, kidney failure, unstageable pressure ulcer to left, deep tissue injury to the right heel, diabetes, and weakness. Review of the Matrix dated 01/26/24 revealed Resident #70 did not have pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #70's current orders and treatment administration records (TAR) dated 12/01/23 to 01/2026 revealed: All the following treatments were supposed to be administered from 7:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. A. On 12/06/23 a new order to cleanse the left heel and left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, review of the skill competency form for catheter care, observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained during urinary catheter care. This affected one resident (#24) of one resident observed for urinary catheter care. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including prostatic hyperplasia, urinary retention, sepsis, and metabolic encephalopathy. Review of Resident #24's plan of care for alteration in elimination related to Foley catheter (dated 01/22/24) revealed to perform catheter care every shift and/or per policy and to maintain dignity when checking/providing incontinence care for the resident. Review of Resident #24's current order revealed an order dated 01/22/24 for catheter care every shift. Review of Resident #24's indwelling catheter assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a diagnosis of urinary retention. The resident required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of Center of Disease Control (CDC) information and guidance, review of infection control log, review of email, policy review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure isolation protocols were discontinued timely. This affected three residents (#10, #63, and #70) of four residents reviewed for isolation. Finding included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including scabies, muscle weakness, urinary tract infection, aftercare following joint replacement, cellulitis, diabetes, respiratory and kidney failure, and heart disease. Review of Resident #10's order dated 01/15/24 revealed the resident was in contact isolation for scabies. Review of Resident #10's history and physical note dated 01/15/24 revealed staff reported the resident had a rash all over his back and they were concerned it was scabies. Assessment plan for the acute scabies was to treat him with permethrin 5% once now and repeat in seven…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of pictures, observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure a safe path of egress on the 300 hall. This had the potential to affect 27 residents (#8, #14, #15, #18, #19, #29, #34, #38, #39, #46, #50, #52, #55, #59, #60, #62, #70, #71, #74, #82, #85, #86, #87, #89, #91, #94, and #100) of 106 residents residing in-house during the time of the survey. Findings included: Observation on 01/26/24 at 10:07 A.M. of 300 hallway from room [ROOM NUMBER] to 321 revealed there was six wheelchairs sitting along the left side of the hall, five yellow caution signs randomly placed down the hallway, and one isolation cart blocking the path of egress. Review of two pictures provided from an anonymous source on 01/26/24 at 10:09 A.M., revealed two different pictures of wheelchairs lined down the left side of the hallway facing the egress doors from rooms 307 to 321. Interviews on 01/26/24 from 10:09 A.M. to 4:22 P.M., with a resident (who would like to remain anonymous) and an anonymous staff member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure proper storage of food items. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving food items from the facility kitchen. The facility identified one resident (Resident #5) who did not receive any food items from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Initial tour of the facility kitchen on 06/06/22 at 8:25 A.M. revealed the following food storage concerns within the walk-in cooler: Two undated large bags of mixed salad open directly to the air and one undated large bag of shredded cheddar cheese open directly to the air. Also, in the walk-in cooler was a small pushcart with several containers of sandwich items stored incorrectly: shredded cheddar cheese, sliced bologna, and tomato slices covered partially with plastic wrap open to the air and undated. Bread slices in a personal waxed single use bag open to the air and undated. Leaf lettuce, Swiss cheese slices, hard boiled eggs, pickles, turkey breast slices, American cheese slices, and sliced onions with no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure meal tickets accurately reflected renal diets and residents who were ordered renal diets received meals as ordered. This finding affected three (Resident's #15, #59 and #75) of four residents reviewed for renal diets. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #75's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease with dialysis, endocarditis, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #75's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he exhibited moderate cognitive impairment Review of Resident #75's physician orders revealed an order dated 05/02/22 for a renal diet with low concentrated sweets and thin liquids. The instructions indicated to limit oranges, orange juice, bananas, and potatoes. Review of Resident #75's breakfast meal ticket dated 06/08/22 indicated a diet with low concentrated sweets with a regular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to store opened medications per facility protocol in three of four medication carts reviewed for medication storage. This affected six (Resident's #21, #36, #11, #26, #73, and #60) residents and had the potential to affect all 97 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 06/07/22 at 11:40 A.M. of the 300-hall red key medication cart revealed insulin pen for Resident #21 was opened with no date listed as to when it was opened. A Victoza (anti-diabetic medication) pen for Resident #11 and a Tuojeo (insulin) pen for Resident #36 were also undated when opened. Interview during the observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #321 confirmed the findings. Observation on 06/07/22 at 12:18 P.M. of the 300-hall yellow key medication cart revealed two bottles of eye drops prescribed to Resident #26 were opened with no date and one bottle of eye drops prescribed to Resident #73 was also opened with no date. Interview during the observation with LPN #321 confirmed the findings. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #353's wound care was completed as ordered. This finding affected one (Resident #353) of three residents reviewed for general skin conditions. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of Resident #353's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease with dialysis, muscle weakness, and diabetes. Review of Resident #353's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he exhibited intact cognition. Review of Resident #353's physician orders revealed an order dated 05/20/22 for negative pressure therapy (wound vac or vacuum-assisted closure of a wound to help wounds heal) to the right lateral foot with the wound vac machine set at 125 mmHg (millimeters of mercury or a measurement of pressure) continuously. Prepare the peri-wound with Skin Prep (forms a protective film to help reduce friction during removal of tapes and films), apply a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #75's pressure ulcer wound care was completed as ordered. This finding affected one (Resident #75) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer wound care. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of Resident #75's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, muscle weakness, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #75's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #75's physician orders revealed an order dated 05/31/22 to apply a wound vac machine (vacuum-assisted closure of a wound to help wounds heal) to the left heel with suction to be placed at 125 mmHg (millimeters of mercury or a measurement of pressure). The wound vac was to be changed every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday and as needed. Review of Resident #75's physician orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure restorative range of motion and splint devices were implemented as ordered by the physician for residents identified with contractures of joints. This affected one (Resident #49) of one resident reviewed for joint limitation. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Observation of Resident #49 on 06/06/22 at 9:29 A.M. revealed contractures to the bilateral elbows and wrists with no splint device in use. Additional observations on 06/07/22 at 10:11 A.M. and 06/08/22 at 7:56 A.M. also revealed contractures with no evidence of splint devices in place. Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/22/20 with admission diagnosis that included quadriplegia and contracture of multiple joints. Review of physician's orders dated on 05/18/22 indicated restorative Passive Range of Motion (PROM) to the bilateral upper and lower extremities times 15 repetitions per session twice daily and a restorative splint program which indicated to apply right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #69) received tube feeding that was not expired of one resident reviewed for tube feeding. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, dysphagia, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of physician's orders for Resident #69 revealed an order dated [DATE] to administer Isosource 1.5 (enteral feed) at 20 milliliters (ml) per hour daily from 8:00 P.M. to 8:00 A.M. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #69 required extensive one-staff physical assistance for eating. Review of the care plan for Resident #69 dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 received enteral feeding as a primary source of nutrition. Interventions included to administer enteral feeding and flush per physicians' orders.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility infection control logs, review of facility policy and procedure, and staff interview the facility failed to implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program to ensure antibiotics were not used unless residents met the criteria to treat an infection. This affected three residents (Resident's #10, #33, and #35) of five residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. This had the potential to affect all 97 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of stage four pressure ulcer (deep wound that reaches the muscles, ligaments, or bone) to the left buttock, osteomyelitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, quadriplegia, spinal cord injury, insomnia, history of urinary tract infections (UTI), and neurogenic bowel and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALTERCARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.8-1.8 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
TSG NURSING CENTERS, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2003
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 FBO ANDREW M SCHROEROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2016
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 FBO GERALD F SCHROER JROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 FBO MATTHEW SCHROEROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2016
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 MARGARET S GOODMANOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
SUSANNE SCHROER DYNASTY TRUST U/AOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2019
THE SCHROER GROUP, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2001
MOCK, DOUGLASIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/20/2021
POWELL, LESLIEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/15/2015
FILM, GEORGEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2019
GOODMAN, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2003
JOHNSON, KATHYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/10/2010
NUTTER, ORIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2021
ALTERCARE OF OHIO, INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2001

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 10%Medicare 3%Other / private 86%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$279per resident / day
operating cost
$8,491per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$249per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365482. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next