No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Summit Acres Nursing Home

44565 Sunset Road, Caldwell, OH 43724 · For profit - Corporation · 95 certified beds · (740) 732-2364 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$16,801 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Dec 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $16,801 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-26)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
18125 Woodsfield Road · (740) 732-7259 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
109 West St · (740) 732-4503 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
120 Olive St
Park
6 Railroad St · (740) 732-5035 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.6%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.3%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.5%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.6%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.3%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.1%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.8%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.2%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine46.5%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.1%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.7%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.401.731.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.481.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 90 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.0%CMS range 49.0–65.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 6.6–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.7–12.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.83
RN hours/ resident / day
0.51
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.15
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.48
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.56
RN hoursweekends
40.5%
Total nursing turnover
22.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 88.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.484 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-28)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, review of the facility incident and accident log and corresponding investigation, review of the Facility Assessment, review of the Elopement Risk Assessment Policy and Procedure and staff, family and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to Resident #74, who was actively exit seeking, cognitively impaired (with a Brief Interview Memory Score of six indicating severe cognitive impairment), identified as an elopement risk and resided on the secured unit, to prevent the resident from exiting the secured unit and the facility unsupervised. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious, life-threatening harm, injuries and/or death on 03/14/24 at approximately 5:50 P.M. when Resident #74 was granted access through the secured unit door by [NAME] #99 (who was unaware if the individual was a resident or visitor), passed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the building was maintained in a sanitary and homelike environment. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 93. Findings include: On [DATE] at 10:16 A.M. thru 10:41 A.M., a tour of the facility was conducted of all areas of the nursing home. The facility had four separate units (Home B, Unit 1, Unit 2, and Speret Hall, which was the facility's secured memory care unit). Home B had a short hall and a long hall and the other units were just one hallway. The hallway that led from the facility's independent living section of the building to Home B Short hall was noted to have a musty/ mildew odor on it. There were no signs of mildew, mold, or evidence of any recent water damage, but the odor was quite noticeable. The hall between the two included some offices, as well as the facility's therapy room and chapel that were accessible to residents. Home B unit (short and long halls) had FRP boarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, policy review, and facility investigation report review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse. This affected two (#12 and #22) of six residents reviewed. The facility census was 89. Findings include:1.Record review revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of brain and unsteadiness on feet. Review of a care plan dated 07/03/25 revealed Resident #12 had behaviors including but not limited to demanding medications and becoming upset when pain medications are not due. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) completed 07/09/25 revealed Resident #12's cognition remained intact. Review of a self-reported incident (SRI) dated 07/21/25 revealed an employee (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #178) entered Resident #12's room and initiated care but also engaged in conversation which upset the resident. Resident #12 reported she is upset by CNA #178 at least a dozen times and CNA #178 had been asked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, policy review, and facility investigation report review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. This affected one (#22) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 89. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including autosomal dominant limb girdle muscle dystrophy and weakness. Review of an minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22's cognition remained intact. Review of a self-reported incident (SRI) dated 09/19/25 revealed an allegation of verbal abuse from Dietary Coordinator (DC) #310 to Resident #22. Witnesses stated DC #310 cussed and yelled at Resident #22 after the resident cussed and insulted her about his missing lunch tray. After the exchange, DC #310 left the room and continued to cuss under her breath as she went up the hallway passing residents and staff. A thorough investigation was completed and the allegation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's infection control tracking logs, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all infections that occurred in the facility was included on their monthly infection control tracking log, trends/ patterns were identified by the infection preventionist when they occurred, and a resident with wounds was placed on enhanced barrier precautions as required. This affected one resident (#14) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, one resident (#22) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, and had the potential to affect all other residents residing in the facility. The facility's census was 84. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's infection control tracking log for Unit 2 in March 2025 revealed there were five separate residents that were identified as having had infections on that unit during that month. Three of the five infections involved the organism of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2 a.) On 05/18/25 11:58 A.M., an observation during the lunch meal service for the residents eating in their rooms on Unit 2 noted Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #187 to be feeding Resident #36, while the resident was in her bed. CNA #187 was standing at the side of the bed while feeding the resident. She was not noted to be sitting in a chair at the bedside to provide the resident with a dignified dining experience. 2 b.) On 05/18/25 at 12:00 P.M., an observation during the lunch meal service for the residents eating in their rooms on Unit 2 noted CNA #500 to be feeding Resident #57, while the resident was in her bed. CNA #500 was standing at the side of the bed while feeding the resident. She was not noted to be sitting in a chair at the bedside to provide the resident with a dignified dining experience. On 05/18/25 at 12:10 P.M., an interview with CNA #187 and CNA #500 confirmed they did feed Resident #36 and #57 in bed, while they stood at the residents' bedside. CNA #187 stated they stood while feeding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of self-reported incident (SRI), review of the facility's investigation, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to prevent resident neglect. This affected one resident (#73) of one resident reviewed for abuse. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cardiac arrhythmia, heart failure, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, weakness, retention of urine, right knee pain, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and reduced mobility. Review of Resident #73's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was 11. The resident was dependent for toiling. He required partial to moderate assistance for personal hygiene, dependent for sitting to lying, lying to sitting, sitting to stand, chair to bed, toilet, and shower transfer. He required substantial/maximal assist to roll left to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and medical record review the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed accurately on admission. This affected one resident (#78) of one resident reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of Resident #78's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/28/25 with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type 2 diabetes, bipolar disorder, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Review of Resident #78's PASARR, dated 02/28/25, did not include the diagnosis of Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or identify psychotropic medications prescribed. Interview on 05/20/25 at 3:20 P.M. with Social Worker #158 including PASARR review verified the PASARR did not include the PTSD diagnosis. Review of the DSM-5 PTSD is classified as a trauma and stressor related disorders. Interview on 05/21/25 at 9:17 A.M. with regional director of SS and activities #306 verified inaccuracy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dental services were provided to Resident #32 and pressure ulcer prevention interventions were implemented for Resident #64 as per the plan of care. This affected three residents (Resident #32 and #64) of 27 residents reviewed for care plans.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, stroke without residual deficits, adult failure to thrive, and legal blindness.Review of Resident #32's payer status in the electronic medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] under Ohio Medicaid (MCD). His payer status did not change until 04/18/25, when he was changed to Hospice MCD. Review of Resident #32's clinical admission documentation dated 01/10/25 revealed the resident had the use of an upper denture that was in fair condition and was missing one tooth. He was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were completed timely following a resident's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and care plans were revised in the areas of dental status and to reflect a resident's reported non-compliance with non-pressure skin impairment interventions. This affected one resident (#32) of two residents reviewed for care conferences and two residents (#7 and #16) of 22 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included reduced mobility, difficulty walking, and the need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #7's dental consults revealed the resident was seen on 03/23/22 and was indicated to have partial dentition. The resident informed the dentist that she had a dentist in a local community that was going to extract all her remaining teeth. Further review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for a resident and failed to provide timely nail care for a resident. This affected two residents (#2 and #14) of seven residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/08/23 and diagnoses including dementia, dysphagia, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, epilepsy, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four indicating severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #2 required setup assist with toilet hygiene and supervision with toilet transfer and was frequently incontinent of urine. An observation on 05/19/25 at 2:14 P.M. revealed Resident #2 seated at a dining room table on the secure unit. Resident #2 was observed to urinate while seated in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and provide treatment to skin integrity concerns. This affected one resident (#73) of two reviewed for non-pressure skin impairments. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cardiac arrhythmia, heart failure, muscle weakness, abnormality of gait and mobility, weakness, retention of urine, right knee pain, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and reduced mobility. Review of Resident #73's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed the residents Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was 11. The resident had no behaviors or rejection of care. The resident required set up for meals, dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, lower body dressing, and putting on and taking off footwear, and partial to moderate assist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure skin prevention interventions were implemented for residents at risk for or having had pressure ulcers and also failed to ensure a resident's pressure ulcer was comprehensively assessed weekly to monitor for wound healing. This affected three residents (#16, #64, and #73) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] following a multiple day hospitalization stay. Her diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) following a stroke affecting her left dominant side, peripheral vascular disease, adult onset diabetes mellitus, reduced mobility, muscle weakness, and dependence on a wheelchair. Review of Resident #16's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had adequate hearing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide timely contracture management. This affected one resident (#56) of one resident reviewed for contractures. Facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 02/28/23 with diagnosis including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, weakness, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, difficulty in walking, pain, and adult failure to thrive. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 04/23/25 revealed range of motion limitation to one side. The resident was dependent upon staff for transfers. Review of occupational therapy discharge summary revealed Resident #56 received occupational therapy from 04/15/25 to 04/23/25. It stated the patient will be further assessed for splinting and palm pad during treatment. Upon discharge from occupational therapy, the resident was tolerating the trial of palm guard, and he demonstrated good rehab potential. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was consistent communication between the facility and the dialysis center on the days a resident went out for hemodialysis treatments. This affected one resident (#62) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. Findings include: Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of end stage renal disease, chronic kidney disease- Stage V, status post nephrectomy (removal of a kidney) in 2022, and dependence on hemodialysis. Review of Resident #62's physician's orders revealed the resident had an order in place to receive dialysis every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. His chair times varied depending on the day of the week. His chair time was 10:30 A.M. every Monday and Friday. His chair time for Wednesday was 8:00 A.M. Review of Resident #62's active care plans revealed the resident had a care plan in place for an alteration in renal function as the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide services to prevent Resident #78 from experiencing triggers related to post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This affected one resident (#78) of one resident reviewed for PTSD. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #78 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type 2 diabetes, bipolar disorder, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), adjustment disorder with depressed mood, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Review of Resident #78's comprehensive care plan revealed no care plan or interventions regarding PTSD. Interview on 05/19/25 at 3:26 P.M. with Resident #78 reports she continues to have triggers to loud noises and has flashbacks due to a car accident at age of 16. Interview on 05/19/25 at 2:16 P.M. with Social Services #158 and Regional Director of Social Services and Activities #306, on admission a trauma informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of a drug reference resource, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a short acting anti-anxiety medication in accordance with their physician's orders to adequately manage anxiety. This affected one resident (#48) of five residents reviewed for behavioral-emotional care. Findings include: Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #48's physician's orders revealed the resident had an order to receive Xanax (a benzodiazepine used in the treatment of anxiety disorders) 0.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) four times a day (QID). The order originated on 04/23/25 and included specific times for administration that included 8:00 A.M., 1:00 P.M., 5:00 P.M., and 9:00 P.M. Review of Resident #48's medication administration history from 05/01/25 through 05/21/25 revealed the Xanax 0.5 mg po QID was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of pharmacy recommendation, and interviews the facility failed to implement pharmacy recommendation and physician orders. This affected one resident (#14) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication review. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including iron deficiency anemia, weakness, fibromyalgia, and Parkinson's disease. Review of Resident #14's pharmacy recommendation undated revealed the resident had received ferrous sulfate 325 milligrams (mg) daily since 2023. Her complete blood count (CBC) was within normal limits on 04/28/25. Recommendation to discontinue ferrous sulfate. On 05/16/25 the physician checked the agree box and wrote an additional comment under the other box to discontinue the monthly CBC. Further review revealed there was a handwritten not authored by the Director of Nursing (DON) dated 05/18/25 that indicated the resident doesn't have monthly CBC and would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure insulin pens were dated when opened. This affected three residents (#26, #49 and #192) of three residents reviewed for insulin use. Findings include: Observation on 05/19/25 at 8:15 A.M. of the unit short B medication cart revealed opened insulin containers with no open dates for the following medications: Resident #49 one Lantus long-acting insulin pen with the dispensed date of 05/06/25, Resident #192 one Lantus long-acting insulin pen with the dispensed date of 05/04/25. Interview on 05/19/25 at 8:15 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #186 verified insulin pens were not dated when opened in the unit short B medication cart. Observation on 05/19/25 at 8:32 A.M. of the unit 2 medication cart revealed opened insulin pens with no opened dates for the following medications: Resident #26 one Lantus long-acting insulin pen with the dispensed date of 03/27/25 and Resident #26 one Insulin Lispro pen with the dispensed date of 11/27/24. Interview on 05/19/25 at 8:32 A.M. with Registered Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's contracted dental company's visit list, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who consented to receive dental services while in the facility, received those services to replace a broken lower denture plate. This affected one resident (#32) of three residents reviewed for dental services. Findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, stroke without residual deficits, adult failure to thrive, and legal blindness. Review of Resident #32's payer status in the electronic medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] under Ohio Medicaid (MCD). His payer status did not change until 04/18/25, when he was changed to Hospice MCD. Review of Resident #32's clinical admission documentation dated 01/10/25 revealed the resident had the use of an upper denture that was in fair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's infection control log, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were not treated with antibiotics for urinary tract infections, unless the residents met criteria for treatment. This affected two residents (#63 and #91), who were noted on the monthly infection control logs for the past three months to receive antibiotics without meeting criteria for treatment. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's infection control log for March 2025 revealed Resident #63 received treatment for a urinary tract infection (UTI) between 03/07/25 and 03/13/25. She was ordered to receive Levofloxacin (an antibiotic used to treat various bacterial infections to include UTI's. The infection control log included columns to indicate if a McGeer's criteria (a set of standardized definitions used for surveillance of healthcare associated infections in long term care facilities and could be used retrospectively to assess the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing) was completed and if the resident met criteria for treatment. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's related investigation, observation, staff interview, employee file review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from staff to resident sexual abuse and another resident was free from neglect when the resident was left on a bed pan for fourteen (14) hours. This affected two residents (#44 and #46) of four residents reviewed for abuse/ neglect. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included a traumatic brain injury, dementia with behavioral disturbances, pseudobulbar affect, restlessness and agitation, mood disorder, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting his right dominant side, contractures of the right upper extremity, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #44's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 01/08/25 revealed the resident had adequate hearing and unclear speech.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's related investigation, observation, staff interview, review of employee files, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of staff to resident sexual abuse and resident neglect were reported to the State survey agency as required. This affected two residents (#44 and #46) of four residents reviewed for abuse/ neglect. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included a traumatic brain injury, dementia with behavioral disturbances, pseudobulbar affect, restlessness and agitation, mood disorder, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting his right dominant side, contractures of the right upper extremity, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #44's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 01/08/25 revealed the resident had adequate hearing and unclear speech. He was rarely/ never able to make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's related investigation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexually inappropriate behavior between a resident and a staff member was recognized as possible sexual abuse and investigated as required. This affected one resident (#44) of four residents reviewed for abuse/ neglect. Findings include: Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included a traumatic brain injury, dementia with behavioral disturbances, pseudobulbar affect, restlessness and agitation, mood disorder, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting his right dominant side, contractures of the right upper extremity, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #44's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 01/08/25 revealed the resident had adequate hearing and unclear speech. He was rarely/ never able to make himself understood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY Based on record review, review of the facility's related investigation, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who entered the facility without any skin breakdown received the care and services to prevent an avoidable pressure ulcer from developing. This affected one resident (#46) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Lewy Body dementia, Alzheimer's disease, metabolic encephalopathy, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #46's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had clear speech and adequate hearing. He was sometimes able to make himself understood and was sometimes able to understand others. His vision was highly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the shower/bathing schedule, review of shower sheets, review of concern log, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received showers per preference. This affected three residents (#17, #52, and #70) of four residents reviewed for showers. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, diabetes, diabetic neuropathy, anemia, history of falling, and amputation of 4th toe. Review of Resident #17's five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was dependent on staff for showers/bathing. Review of the shower/bath schedule (undated) revealed Resident #17 was scheduled for a shower/bath on 6:00 A.M. to 2:00 P.M. shift on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Review of Resident #17's shower sheets dated 08/09/24 to 09/09/24 revealed the resident had a complete bed bath on 08/30/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, electronic mail (email) communication review, interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to reasonably accommodate the request of Resident #72's family/responsible party to install an electronic monitoring device (camera of choice) in Resident #72's room. This affected one resident (#72) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, hypertension, cardiac arrhythmia, anxiety, and depression. Review of the demographics sheet for Resident #72 revealed Resident Representative (RR) #500 was power of attorney (POA) and health care decision maker for Resident #72. Review of POA documents for Resident #72 revealed RR #500 was designated as POA on 11/20/15. Review of the care plan dated 02/09/24 revealed Resident #72 had cognitive loss/dementia with trouble sleeping or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #16's medical record was maintained in a secure and confidential manner. This affected one (Resident #16) of one resident reviewed for confidentiality of medical records. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Observation on 04/17/24 at 10:05 A.M. revealed a computer monitor, located on the top of a medication cart, displaying Resident #16's confidential health information. There was no staff member utilizing the medication cart at the time of the observation. During interview on 04/17/24 at 10:13 A.M., Regional Director of Nursing (DON) #151 confirmed the computer monitor was displaying confidential medical records and should not be. Regional DON #151 locked the screen to ensure privacy. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medical Record Policy and Procedure, dated 08/16/10, revealed it is the facility's policy to utilize an electronic medical records system. The facility maintains resident and facility privacy and promotes the protection of clinical information within and above…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility investigation review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed regarding a resident elopement. This affected one resident (Resident #74) of two residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, and depression. Resident #74 was admitted to the facility Speret Hall, a secure unit that required a code to enter and exit the unit. Clinical admission documentation dated 02/28/24 at 3:25 P.M. authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Program Director (PD) #128 revealed Resident #74 had short and long-term memory impairment and no mobility limitations. Resident #74's gait and balance were normal. The assessment revealed Resident #74 was not at risk for falls but was at high risk for elopement. An elopement risk observation form dated 02/28/24 authored by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of shower schedules, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents, who were dependent on staff for personal care, were provided the assistance they required for showers and nail care. This affected three (Resident #26, #41, and #236) of five residents received for activities of daily living (ADL). Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses include the need for assistance with personal care, weakness, reduced mobility, abnormalities of gait and mobility, cerebral palsy, and adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had clear speech and adequate hearing. She was able to make herself understood and was usually able to understand others. She was cognitively intact and was not known to display any behaviors. Review of Resident #26's care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of audiology visit reports, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was seen by an audiologist as requested by the resident and/ or her resident representative. This affected one (Resident #26) of two residents reviewed for ancillary services. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebral palsy and adult- onset diabetes mellitus. Her payer status was private insurance when she was first admitted and was Medicaid (MCD) effective 12/22/23. Review of Resident #26's ancillary service consent form through 360 Care revealed the resident's niece signed the bottom of the consent form under where residents without MCD had the option to consent or decline those services. The consent form was signed on 09/29/23, but the boxes were not checked to indicate whether the niece wanted the resident to receive those services or not.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received routine, preventative foot care. This affected one resident (#2) of two residents reviewed for ancillary services. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart disease, vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, and weakness. Review of the care plan, initiated on 05/06/21, revealed the resident had an alteration in blood glucose related to the diagnosis of insulin dependent diabetes mellitus with an intervention to observe the feet for potential ulcer formation. Further review of the care plan, initiated on 04/10/24, revealed the resident had an infection of the right great toe. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #2's last podiatry examination was on 09/14/23. Review of the podiatry progress note dated 09/14/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, review of the facility policy, and review of manufacture instructions, the facility failed to ensure Resident #8's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask was properly cleaned. This affected one (Resident #8) out of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with exacerbation, emphysema, sleep apnea, and anxiety disorder. Review of a plan of care dated 12/28/21 revealed Resident #8 had the potential for impaired gas exchange related to diagnoses of sleep apnea and the use of CPAP (a form of positive airway pressure that is continuously applied to the upper airway collapse, as occurs in sleep apnea and is highly effective in treating sleep apnea) equipment. Interventions for cleaning CPAP equipment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, pharmacy review, and interview the facility failed to ensure physician orders were implemented after a pharmacy recommendation and failed to provide rationale for extending as needed psychotropic medication beyond 14 days. This affected one resident (Resident #62) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 85. Findings include: a. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #62 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, alcohol abuse, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 had severely impaired cognition and behaviors (verbal/disruptive sounds) towards others. Review of the monthly pharmacy recommendation dated 08/04/23 revealed a recommendation for Resident #62 to have a gradual dose reduction. The physician wrote an order (no date) on the pharmacy recommendation for Zyprexa (antipsychotic) 2.5 milligram (mg) twice a day to be decreased to 2.5 mg once a day for 14 days and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a self- reported incident (SRI), facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were not misappropriated by facility staff. This affected one resident (#13) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 82. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, Raynaud's syndrome without gangrene, supraventricular tachycardia, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, insomnia, senile degeneration of the brain, hallucinations, unspecified mood affective disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and tinea unguium. Review of an annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment completed on 10/13/23 revealed Resident #13 had severely impaired cognition. Review of orders revealed Resident #13 was ordered ativan 0.5 milligrams (mg) twice a day for anxiety on 09/06/23, norco 5-325 mg as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to utilize the starter box from the pharmacy to administer the correct medication to a resident when their medication was not able to be located. This affected one resident (#13) of one resident reviewed for medications. The facility census was 82. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, Raynaud's syndrome without gangrene, supraventricular tachycardia, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, insomnia, senile degeneration of the brain, hallucinations, unspecified mood affective disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and tinea unguium. Review of an annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment completed on 10/13/23 revealed Resident #13 had severely impaired cognition. Review of orders revealed Resident #13 was ordered ativan 0.5 milligrams (mg) twice a day for anxiety on 09/06/23, norco 5-325…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to provide oxygen as ordered by the physician. This affected two Residents (#2 and #26) of three reviewed for oxygen. The facility census was 86. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple myeloma not having achieved remission, generalized muscle weakness, shortness of breath, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and pleural effusion in other conditions classified elsewhere. Review of Resident #2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/18/23, revealed she was cognitively intact and had an active diagnosis of respiratory failure. Further review revealed she received oxygen therapy while not a resident and while a resident. Review of Resident #2's physician order dated, 08/29/23, identified she was to have continuous oxygen at two liters/minute per nasal cannula. The staff were to check placement and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record related to skin wounds. This affected two residents (#62 and #67) of three residents reviewed. Findings include: Interview 08/30/23 at 11:31 A.M. with the Administrator revealed the facility had an incident when two residents developed maggots in their skin wounds. Record review for Resident #67 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and a 08/28/23 readmission with diagnoses including acute osteomyelitis of the right femur, paraplegia, weakness, abnormal posture, dysphasia, need for assistance with personal care, osteomyelitis of the sacrum, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, unspecified psychosis, muscular dysfunction of bladder, reduce mobility, hypertension, insomnia, colostomy, abscess of the left testicle, irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, indwelling urinary catheter nephrostomy, delusional disorder, paranoid disorder, and acute kidney failure. Review of the 07/17/23 quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of inservice records, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control standards and practices were followed regarding the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to help prevent the spread of Covid-19 within the facility. This had the potential to affect all 81 residents that resided in the facility except 22 residents (Resident #2, #5, #11, #13, #20, #23, #26, #29, #30, #31, #32, #50, #51, #55, #60, #62, #68, #70, #71, #74, #75, and #81) who the facility identified as having or have had Covid-19 since their most recent Covid-19 outbreak began on 07/27/23. Findings include: 1. On 08/10/23 at 7:44 A.M., a random observation during the initial tour of the facility noted State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #196 walking in the hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER]. She had a surgical mask with the ear loops behind her ears and the mask portion over her chin. STNA #196's mouth and nose were visible due to not having a mask over…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure cold foods were held and served at appropriate temperatures. This had the potential to affect all 78 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 09/19/22 at 10:45 A.M. initial tour of the kitchen revealed a walk in cooler containing cold food items including milk and juice. Temperature monitoring was noted to be completed twice a day and documented on a temperature log. No discrepancies were identified and for the month of September 2022, the cooler temperature was documented as less than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Upon observation, the thermometer in the walk-in cooler was 32-34 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility kitchen provided meal service for residents who resided in the skilled nursing facility and the residential care facility, which were physically located in the same building. On 09/21/22 at 10:30 A.M. observation of the kitchen revealed staff were preparing for the lunch meal. Dietary staff working included [NAME] #147, Dietary Aide #171, [NAME] #112 and Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, open and closed record review, interview, resident handbook review and facility policy and procedure review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided the opportunity to exercise their right to smoke according to the facility smoking policy and failed to ensure new admissions were notified of the facility new smoking procedures upon admission. This affected two residents (#12 and #284) of two residents reviewed for smoking. The facility identified seven residents who smoke. The census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/17/21 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the esophagus, gastroesophageal reflux disease, anxiety, protein calorie malnutrition and depression. Review of the plan of care, dated 04/19/22 revealed the resident was unable to smoke without supervision due to Hospice diagnosis, anxiety, depression, nausea and vomiting. Interventions included all smoking materials would be locked up in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to revise a comprehensive person-centered care plan following a fall for Resident #38. This affected one resident (#38) of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, muscle weakness, repeated falls, diabetes mellitus, and Parkinson's disease. Review of Resident #38's Fall with Injury Event, dated 02/19/22, revealed on 02/19/22 at 7:00 A.M., the resident stated he fell in the bathroom and hit his face on the bathroom sink. The fall was unwitnessed. There was swelling and bruising noted to the resident's right cheek, and pain and swelling of the right shin. The resident was transferred to the emergency room for evaluation. Review of Resident #38's care plan revealed no documentation of fall interventions initiated following the fall on 02/19/22. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment, dated 08/10/22 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #59, who required staff assistance with activity of daily living (ADL) care received timely and adequate assistance with nail care to maintain good hygiene/grooming. This affected one resident (#59) of three residents reviewed for ADL care. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, weakness, heart failure, need for assistance with personal care, abnormalities of gait and mobility, onychomycosis, and anxiety. Review of the plan of care, initiated 12/01/20 revealed staff would provide ADL assistance as needed to the resident. On 08/16/22 record review revealed a consent to receive podiatry services. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment, dated 08/23/22 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated Resident #59 was mildly cognitively impaired. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a pressure ulcer treatment was provided as ordered for Resident #50. This affected one resident (#50) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #50 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, dementia, diabetes mellitus, atherosclerotic heart disease, and history of falling. Record review revealed the resident's skin was intact on admission. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 99, which indicated the interview was not attempted as the resident was rarely/never understood. There were no behaviors or rejection of care identified on the assessment. The MDS assessment revealed the resident required extensive, two-person assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating and toileting. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #51, who had a limitation in range of motion/contracture to the left hand was provided a hand roll as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#51) of one resident reviewed for range of motion. Findings include: A review of Resident #51's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including contracture of bilateral hands, Alzheimer's disease, dementia without behavioral disturbances, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. A review of Resident #51's physician's orders revealed the resident had a order (initiated 07/01/19) to cleanse her left hand with soap and water, dry well, and place a rolled washcloth in the hand every morning. The order indicated for staff to remove the rolled washcloth every night at bedtime. A review of Resident #51's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/12/22 revealed the resident had highly impaired hearing and no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, facility investigation review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to provide adequate and appropriate supervision/interventions to prevent resident elopements and failed to ensure comprehensive elopement investigations were completed to potentially prevent reoccurrence. This affected two residents (#82 and #285) of two residents reviewed for elopement. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #82's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbances, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, generalized anxiety disorder, toxic encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), muscle weakness, difficulty walking, history of falling, osteoporosis, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. A review of Resident #82's Elopement Risk Observation, dated 06/07/22 revealed the resident was considered a low risk for elopement. Risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to provide appropriate care in a manner to decrease the risk of Resident #78 developing a urinary tract infection. This affected one resident (#78) of one resident observed for incontinence care. Findings include: Review of Resident #78's medical record revealed diagnoses including history of kidney infection and urinary tract infection, bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knees, and cognitive communication deficit. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/28/22 revealed Resident #78 required extensive assistance from staff for toilet use and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. A urologist note, dated 09/12/22 revealed an order for the antibiotic, Macrobid 100 milligrams (mg) twice a day for urinary tract infection prophylaxis. The note indicated associated diagnoses for use of the Macrobid were kidney stone, right ureteral stone, and retained ureteral stent. On 09/22/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #9 did not receive an antibiotic without an adequate indication for use and meeting criteria for the treatment of a urinary tract infection (UTI). This affected one resident (#9) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: A review of Resident #9's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included dementia, unspecified psychosis, and schizo-affective disorder of the depressive type. The resident was hospitalized between 08/30/22 and 09/02/22. A review of Resident #9's hospital records for her hospitalization between 08/30/22 and 09/02/22 revealed the reason for her hospitalization was bipolar affective disorder. Record review revealed the resident had been started on an antibiotic, Cephalexin (Keflex) 500 milligrams (mg) three times a day beginning 08/30/22. A copy of laboratory testing completed at the hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized immunization program to ensure influenza and/or pneumococcal immunizations were provided to Resident #68 and Resident #231 when indicated. This affected two residents (#68 and #231) of six residents reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #68's medical record revealed diagnoses including traumatic brain injury and history of pneumonia. Resident #68's date of birth was 10/26/61. Review of vaccination information indicated Resident #68 received an influenza vaccination in 2017 and 2018. In addition, Resident #68 had received the PCV-13 pneumonia vaccine on 01/31/19 and the PPSV 23 pneumonia vaccine on 01/06/17. A form for acknowledgement of vaccine information included a notation dated 11/09/21 indicating staff spoke with Resident #68's representative to request consent to administer the influenza and pneumonia vaccine and was told the representative would think about it and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,801 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-04-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ALTERCARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
TSG NURSING CENTERS, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/28/2012
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 FBO ANDREW M SCHROEROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 FBO GERALD F SCHROER JROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 FBO MATTHEW SCHROEROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
GERALD F SCHROER DYNASTY TR UA 12312009 MARGARET S GOODMANOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
SUSANNE SCHROER DYNASTY TRUST U/AOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/15/2015
THE SCHROER GROUP, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/28/2012
CLEARY, SEANIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/27/2016
MOCK, DOUGLASIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/20/2021
FILM, GEORGEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/01/2018
GOODMAN, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/28/2012
JOHNSON, KATHYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/28/2012
MCNUTT, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/30/2015
NUTTER, ORIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2021
ALTERCARE OF OHIO, INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/28/2012

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 50%Medicare 5%Other / private 45%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$259per resident / day
operating cost
$7,887per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$246per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365612. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next